首页 > 最新文献

Information Systems Journal最新文献

英文 中文
The new wave of 'hybrid' work: An opportunity to revise assumptions and build theory 新一波“混合”工作:修正假设和建立理论的机会
IF 6.5 2区 管理学 Q1 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Pub Date : 2024-08-23 DOI: 10.1111/isj.12558
Efpraxia D. Zamani, Mary Beth Watson-Manheim, Pamela Abbott, Angela Lin
<p>The motivation for this special issue lies in the recent resurgence of interest in and the accelerated adoption of hybrid work practices against the backdrop of the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p>As a result of enforced lockdown policies, hybrid work emerged as a ‘new form of work’, whereby work arrangements began integrating physical workspace and time with their virtual counterparts to maintain business continuity. Hybrid work can be understood as a form of work that blends traditional office-based work with remotely located alternatives (Gratton, <span>2021</span>). Earlier work on hybridity in the workplace conceptualised hybridity as combining three kinds of space: physical office-based space, home-based domestic space and virtual online cyberspace (Halford, <span>2005</span>). The dynamics of the social relations and spatial arrangements that co-exist and co-evolve in such spaces have been variously explored in the literature, especially in homeworking and teleworking (Baruch, <span>2001</span>; Felstead & Jewson, <span>2000</span>; Gurstein, <span>2001</span>).</p><p>However, the unique situations that such a confluence affords, for example forms of work that simultaneously accommodate and shape these new organisational spaces, have not yet been explored. Indeed, recent practices, particularly during and after the COVID-19 pandemic, indicated that it is not merely the spatial dimension that bears significance over where and how hybrid work is undertaken and organised, but that the temporal dimension is crucially important as well (Gratton, <span>2021</span>). Further, recent scholarship indicates that hybrid work goes beyond the confluence of space and time, but rather fuses these dimensions together to create new workspaces (Chamakiotis et al., <span>2024</span>).</p><p>New forms of work are seen to offer perspectives on the temporo-spatial re-organisation of work and have tended to foreground mostly social and organisational processes involved in these work modalities, for example work/life balance, the dissolution of boundaries between the personal and the professional, expanding of working time, invasion of personal space by the domination of work activities (Ellison, <span>2004</span>; Nansen et al., <span>2010</span>; Wapshott & Mallett, <span>2012</span>). According to de Vaujany et al. (<span>2021</span>), however, these temporo-spatial perspectives have fundamentally changed the nature of work, ‘<i>We just share some frontiers and liminalities in the new worlds of work</i>. <i>We cross them but we do not occupy them anymore</i>. <i>Digitality is the very large enabler and mediation of these dyschronies</i>. <i>And the Covid</i>-<i>19 crisis has made more visible and more present this process of</i> “<i>liminalization</i>”. <i>Work is not a grounded time-space unity any more</i>, <i>a heavy production tool or IT artefacts</i>. <i>It is an ephemeral and precarious connective activity that can take place everywhere</i>, <i>every
空间被认为是动态的、辩证的和充满意义的(Lefebvre, 1991)。空间不是绝对的,也不可能独立于社会实践。例如,不同人群(如妇女/男子、成人/儿童、少数民族群体)对同一空间的感知和理解是不同的;因此,不可能赋予空间单一而客观的含义。在这种情况下,空间被视为一种(社会)产物(列斐伏尔,1991 年),是由社会关系构建而成(马西,1995 年)。空间化被定义为一个构建和创造空间的过程,在这个过程中,社会活动和关系得以体现(Dobritsyna,2019),而勒菲弗尔(1991)认为,空间化包含了物质空间实践、空间表征和表征空间之间的辩证关系。物质空间实践(体验)指的是物理和物质流的空间移动,以确保(商品)生产和社会生产。空间表征(感知的)由标志和符号、代码和知识组成,使物质实践能够被 "谈论",并以日常常识和外行术语或专家使用的特殊术语进行描述。表象空间(构想)指的是对空间实践的新含义或可能性的想象。混合工作至少涉及三个空间:公共空间、私人空间(或远程空间)和虚拟空间(Halford,2005 年)。公共空间指集中式办公室;私人空间指个人工作环境;虚拟空间指计算机生成的网络空间。在混合工作的背景下,办公室被视为一个表演空间,在这里进行社交和办公活动,并确定正式的工作节奏;虚拟空间被视为一个生产和交换符号、象征、图像和话语的空间。混合工作空间是一个整合空间,它将公共空间、私人空间和虚拟空间融合为一个实体,使人员、活动和物质流在空间上无摩擦地流动。因此,混合工作需要对传统工作场所和家庭空间进行重新空间化(Halford,2005 年)。家庭空间的重新空间化主要要求混合工人和同一家庭的共同居住者重新审视他们对 "家 "的体验、感知和概念,进而重新配置家庭的空间组织。由于将以往在公共领域进行的经济活动引入私人空间,家庭内部的空间安排、社会关系和社会实践都发生了变化。与此同时,传统工作场所也被重新空间化,因为混合工作要求工人和雇主重新审视他们对办公空间的体验、感知和概念,以构建一个新的工作空间,反映新的混合工作安排,体现新的社会实践。事实上,关于时间的概念有多种多样,既有完全客观主义的方法,也有完全主观的理论,而且研究往往会根据所调查的现象、学科定位以及本体论关注点而采用不同的视角。仅就与工作有关的研究而言,时间问题已通过旅行时间(如通勤时间)的影响和性质(Bonsall &amp; Shires, 2006)、通过开始/结束工作时间的时间位移(Lyons &amp; Haddad, 2008),以及通过基于实践的视角(关注工人在工作时的所作所为)(Im et al.其中有几项研究特别探讨了技术和系统作为时间结构对个人/职业界限的影响,并组织了工作实践的节奏和周期,引起了人们的关注(Lee &amp; Liebenau, 2000; Oborn &amp; Barrett, 2021; Orlikowski &amp; Yates, 2002)。(Munn, 1992, p.
{"title":"The new wave of 'hybrid' work: An opportunity to revise assumptions and build theory","authors":"Efpraxia D. Zamani,&nbsp;Mary Beth Watson-Manheim,&nbsp;Pamela Abbott,&nbsp;Angela Lin","doi":"10.1111/isj.12558","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12558","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;The motivation for this special issue lies in the recent resurgence of interest in and the accelerated adoption of hybrid work practices against the backdrop of the COVID-19 pandemic.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;As a result of enforced lockdown policies, hybrid work emerged as a ‘new form of work’, whereby work arrangements began integrating physical workspace and time with their virtual counterparts to maintain business continuity. Hybrid work can be understood as a form of work that blends traditional office-based work with remotely located alternatives (Gratton, &lt;span&gt;2021&lt;/span&gt;). Earlier work on hybridity in the workplace conceptualised hybridity as combining three kinds of space: physical office-based space, home-based domestic space and virtual online cyberspace (Halford, &lt;span&gt;2005&lt;/span&gt;). The dynamics of the social relations and spatial arrangements that co-exist and co-evolve in such spaces have been variously explored in the literature, especially in homeworking and teleworking (Baruch, &lt;span&gt;2001&lt;/span&gt;; Felstead &amp; Jewson, &lt;span&gt;2000&lt;/span&gt;; Gurstein, &lt;span&gt;2001&lt;/span&gt;).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;However, the unique situations that such a confluence affords, for example forms of work that simultaneously accommodate and shape these new organisational spaces, have not yet been explored. Indeed, recent practices, particularly during and after the COVID-19 pandemic, indicated that it is not merely the spatial dimension that bears significance over where and how hybrid work is undertaken and organised, but that the temporal dimension is crucially important as well (Gratton, &lt;span&gt;2021&lt;/span&gt;). Further, recent scholarship indicates that hybrid work goes beyond the confluence of space and time, but rather fuses these dimensions together to create new workspaces (Chamakiotis et al., &lt;span&gt;2024&lt;/span&gt;).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;New forms of work are seen to offer perspectives on the temporo-spatial re-organisation of work and have tended to foreground mostly social and organisational processes involved in these work modalities, for example work/life balance, the dissolution of boundaries between the personal and the professional, expanding of working time, invasion of personal space by the domination of work activities (Ellison, &lt;span&gt;2004&lt;/span&gt;; Nansen et al., &lt;span&gt;2010&lt;/span&gt;; Wapshott &amp; Mallett, &lt;span&gt;2012&lt;/span&gt;). According to de Vaujany et al. (&lt;span&gt;2021&lt;/span&gt;), however, these temporo-spatial perspectives have fundamentally changed the nature of work, ‘&lt;i&gt;We just share some frontiers and liminalities in the new worlds of work&lt;/i&gt;. &lt;i&gt;We cross them but we do not occupy them anymore&lt;/i&gt;. &lt;i&gt;Digitality is the very large enabler and mediation of these dyschronies&lt;/i&gt;. &lt;i&gt;And the Covid&lt;/i&gt;-&lt;i&gt;19 crisis has made more visible and more present this process of&lt;/i&gt; “&lt;i&gt;liminalization&lt;/i&gt;”. &lt;i&gt;Work is not a grounded time-space unity any more&lt;/i&gt;, &lt;i&gt;a heavy production tool or IT artefacts&lt;/i&gt;. &lt;i&gt;It is an ephemeral and precarious connective activity that can take place everywhere&lt;/i&gt;, &lt;i&gt;every","PeriodicalId":48049,"journal":{"name":"Information Systems Journal","volume":"35 2","pages":"710-719"},"PeriodicalIF":6.5,"publicationDate":"2024-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/isj.12558","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143424323","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Digitally enabled sharing economy models at the base of the pyramid 金字塔底层的数字化共享经济模式
IF 6.5 2区 管理学 Q1 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Pub Date : 2024-08-22 DOI: 10.1111/isj.12555
Israr Qureshi, Babita Bhatt, Dhirendra Mani Shukla
<p>The digitally enabled sharing economy, a system where underutilised assets or services are exchanged via digital platforms, offers unique opportunities for value creation at the base of the pyramid (BoP)1 (Qureshi, Bhatt, & Shukla, <span>2021b</span>). When leveraged effectively, sharing economy models (SEM) can bring hope for a more inclusive and sustainable economic future. Leveraging digital technologies, it is claimed, facilitates the efficient redistribution of resources, ensuring that even those with limited means can access goods and services that were previously out of reach. Optimising the use of idle assets not only maximises economic benefits for participants but also, it is argued, fosters community engagement and social cohesion. Additionally, SEM have the potential to promote inclusivity and sustainability by providing marginalised communities with avenues for income generation, resource sharing and enhanced social capital. The integration of digital platforms with SEM ensures wider reach and accessibility, making it a powerful tool for addressing economic disparities and driving positive social change if implemented by social intermediaries (Pillai, Shukla, & Qureshi, <span>2021</span>).</p><p>Recent studies have documented numerous digitally enabled sharing economy models (DESEM) at the BoP, which help offer a range of products and services, including transportation (e.g., SafeBoda, Eva.coop), accommodation (e.g., Fairbnb, CoAbode), innovative coworking spaces (e.g., Impact Hub), shared farming (e.g., Farmizen), agricultural equipment (e.g. EM3, Hello Tractor), trading (e.g., Ethitrade), financial services (e.g., FarmDrive, Rang De), communal sharing (e.g., Moving Feast, bHive) and sharing channels for agricultural produce (MIRI Haat, Loop) (Qureshi, Bhatt, & Shukla, <span>2021a</span>).</p><p>DESEM has the potential to address grand societal challenges such as poverty, marginalisation, inequality, discrimination, hunger and greenhouse gas emissions that often characterise the BoP population. However, scholars have also documented the dark sides of DESEM, where discrimination, exploitation and social exclusion can be reproduced and nurtured (Mosaad et al., <span>2023</span>; Qureshi, Bhatt, & Shukla, <span>2021c</span>). Despite its relevance, DESEM has not been adequately explored in existing research. SEM at the BoP can be understood through three dimensions: scope of sharing, possibility of socialisation and degree of social intermediation (Qureshi, Bhatt, & Shukla, <span>2021b</span>). The synergistic integration of digital technologies with these dimensions has the potential to increase the access and reach of DESEM. The configurations of SEM across these dimensions and their alignment with digital technologies, such as digital platform characteristics, have significant implications for social, economic and environmental value creation (Figure 1).</p><p>The paper included in this special issue provides
数字共享经济是一种通过数字平台交换未充分利用的资产或服务的系统,为金字塔底层的价值创造提供了独特的机会1(库雷希,巴特,&;舒克拉,2021 b)。如果利用得当,共享经济模式可以为更具包容性和可持续性的经济未来带来希望。据称,利用数字技术有助于有效地重新分配资源,确保即使是那些手段有限的人也能获得以前无法获得的商品和服务。有人认为,优化闲置资产的使用不仅可以最大限度地提高参与者的经济效益,还可以促进社区参与和社会凝聚力。此外,通过为边缘化社区提供创收、资源共享和增强社会资本的途径,SEM具有促进包容性和可持续性的潜力。数字平台与SEM的整合确保了更广泛的覆盖范围和可访问性,使其成为解决经济差距和推动积极社会变革的强大工具,如果由社会中介实施(Pillai, Shukla, &;库雷希,2021)。最近的研究记录了BoP的许多数字化共享经济模型(DESEM),这些模型有助于提供一系列产品和服务,包括交通(例如SafeBoda、Eva.coop)、住宿(例如Fairbnb、CoAbode)、创新的共享空间(例如Impact Hub)、共享农业(例如Farmizen)、农业设备(例如EM3、Hello Tractor)、交易(例如Ethitrade)、金融服务(例如FarmDrive、Rang De)、公共共享(例如Moving Feast、bHive)和农产品共享渠道(MIRI Haat, Loop)(库雷希,巴特,&;舒克拉,2021)。DESEM有潜力解决重大的社会挑战,如贫困、边缘化、不平等、歧视、饥饿和温室气体排放,这些挑战往往是BoP人口的特征。然而,学者们也记录了DESEM的黑暗面,其中歧视,剥削和社会排斥可以复制和培育(Mosaad et al., 2023;库雷希,巴特,&;舒克拉,2021 c)。尽管它具有相关性,但在现有的研究中尚未充分探讨DESEM。BoP的SEM可以通过三个维度来理解:共享的范围、社会化的可能性和社会中介的程度(Qureshi, Bhatt, &;舒克拉,2021 b)。数字技术与这些方面的协同整合有可能增加DESEM的获取和覆盖范围。SEM在这些维度上的配置及其与数字技术(如数字平台特征)的一致性对社会、经济和环境价值创造具有重要意义(图1)。本期特刊中的论文对DESEM的不确定性和信任问题提供了重要见解,这些问题可能会阻碍BoP更广泛地参与此类模型。Cheng等人(2025)认为,BoP参与者(司机)的低收入和文化水平加剧了他们对不确定性的敏感性和对拼车经济缺乏信任,并随着时间的推移降低了他们对拼车的参与度。利用不确定性减少理论,作者探讨了减轻BoP司机不确定性和培养对拼车平台信任的机制。他们确定了三层不确定性:对乘客的信任、对拼车平台的信任和拼车制度机制的有效性。利用连续、多研究、三角混合方法研究设计,作者发现感知同理心和信息一致性增加了BoP司机对乘客的信任,而有效的托管服务、感知公正和匹配准确性增强了他们对拼车平台的信任。高度的隐私控制进一步增强了这种信任,鼓励更多的平台参与。此外,通过对乘客、拼车平台和有效的制度机制的信任来减少不确定性,可以提高司机的参与度。后续访谈证实了这些定量结果。本研究通过探索BoP驾驶员的认知和行为,扩展了DESEM文献,强调了将托管服务等数字平台特征与SEM维度相匹配的作用,以减轻负面影响并提高参与度。未来的研究应该探索增强这些特征,以进一步改善平台与SEM尺寸的对齐。
{"title":"Digitally enabled sharing economy models at the base of the pyramid","authors":"Israr Qureshi,&nbsp;Babita Bhatt,&nbsp;Dhirendra Mani Shukla","doi":"10.1111/isj.12555","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12555","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;The digitally enabled sharing economy, a system where underutilised assets or services are exchanged via digital platforms, offers unique opportunities for value creation at the base of the pyramid (BoP)1 (Qureshi, Bhatt, &amp; Shukla, &lt;span&gt;2021b&lt;/span&gt;). When leveraged effectively, sharing economy models (SEM) can bring hope for a more inclusive and sustainable economic future. Leveraging digital technologies, it is claimed, facilitates the efficient redistribution of resources, ensuring that even those with limited means can access goods and services that were previously out of reach. Optimising the use of idle assets not only maximises economic benefits for participants but also, it is argued, fosters community engagement and social cohesion. Additionally, SEM have the potential to promote inclusivity and sustainability by providing marginalised communities with avenues for income generation, resource sharing and enhanced social capital. The integration of digital platforms with SEM ensures wider reach and accessibility, making it a powerful tool for addressing economic disparities and driving positive social change if implemented by social intermediaries (Pillai, Shukla, &amp; Qureshi, &lt;span&gt;2021&lt;/span&gt;).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Recent studies have documented numerous digitally enabled sharing economy models (DESEM) at the BoP, which help offer a range of products and services, including transportation (e.g., SafeBoda, Eva.coop), accommodation (e.g., Fairbnb, CoAbode), innovative coworking spaces (e.g., Impact Hub), shared farming (e.g., Farmizen), agricultural equipment (e.g. EM3, Hello Tractor), trading (e.g., Ethitrade), financial services (e.g., FarmDrive, Rang De), communal sharing (e.g., Moving Feast, bHive) and sharing channels for agricultural produce (MIRI Haat, Loop) (Qureshi, Bhatt, &amp; Shukla, &lt;span&gt;2021a&lt;/span&gt;).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;DESEM has the potential to address grand societal challenges such as poverty, marginalisation, inequality, discrimination, hunger and greenhouse gas emissions that often characterise the BoP population. However, scholars have also documented the dark sides of DESEM, where discrimination, exploitation and social exclusion can be reproduced and nurtured (Mosaad et al., &lt;span&gt;2023&lt;/span&gt;; Qureshi, Bhatt, &amp; Shukla, &lt;span&gt;2021c&lt;/span&gt;). Despite its relevance, DESEM has not been adequately explored in existing research. SEM at the BoP can be understood through three dimensions: scope of sharing, possibility of socialisation and degree of social intermediation (Qureshi, Bhatt, &amp; Shukla, &lt;span&gt;2021b&lt;/span&gt;). The synergistic integration of digital technologies with these dimensions has the potential to increase the access and reach of DESEM. The configurations of SEM across these dimensions and their alignment with digital technologies, such as digital platform characteristics, have significant implications for social, economic and environmental value creation (Figure 1).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The paper included in this special issue provides ","PeriodicalId":48049,"journal":{"name":"Information Systems Journal","volume":"35 2","pages":"807-813"},"PeriodicalIF":6.5,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/isj.12555","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143423656","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The dynamics, organisation and evolution of digital platforms and ecosystems 数字平台和生态系统的动态、组织和进化
IF 6.5 2区 管理学 Q1 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Pub Date : 2024-08-17 DOI: 10.1111/isj.12548
Barney Tan, Xiao Xiao, Michael Chau, Felix Ter Chian Tan, Carmen Leong
<p>Against the backdrop of the present networked economy and the dynamic landscape of modern business, digital platforms and ecosystems (DP&Es) have emerged as pivotal forces driving innovation, competition, and growth (Chen et al., <span>2021</span>). These digitally-enabled, interconnected business networks, underpinned by advanced technologies, facilitate the seamless exchange of goods, services, and information, thereby transforming traditional industries and creating new economic opportunities (Rietveld & Schilling, <span>2020</span>).</p><p>In reflection of their prominence, research on DP&Es is growing (Murthy & Madhok, <span>2021</span>). In particular, the emerging research has highlighted a number of important benefits generated by the rise of DP&Es. First, on a macro-level, they have profound implications for how various industries and economies function, often upending the rules of competition, business norms, as well as the strategies and operations of the constituent entities completely (Thatchenkery & Katila, <span>2023</span>). Second, at the organisational level, DP&Es play a significant role in fostering innovation and profitability for businesses by improving their reach (Recker et al., <span>2024</span>) and capacity for collaboration and knowledge sharing (Ofe & Sandberg, <span>2023</span>). Third, beyond the realm of business and profitability, DP&Es can also enable cross-sector collaboration and social innovation, underscoring their potential to drive positive societal change (Logue & Grimes, <span>2022</span>; Masiero & Arvidsson, <span>2021</span>).</p><p>Despite these benefits, and as noted in our initial call for papers, scholars have identified numerous open questions and knowledge gaps that need to be addressed to better understand and leverage the potential of DP&Es (e.g., Rietveld & Schilling, <span>2020</span>). Our collective understanding of the existing literature suggests that there are three critical areas in particular that should be developed further.</p><p>The first is the need for a deeper understanding of how entities within DP&Es compete, collaborate, complement, and interact with one another. The dynamic interactions among various entities, such as platform owners, complementors, and consumers, are crucial for the overall health and success of the ecosystem (Zhang et al., <span>2022</span>). However, existing research often focuses on isolated aspects, such as competition or collaboration (e.g., Chung et al., <span>2023</span>; Zhu & Liu, <span>2018</span>), without considering the broader spectrum of interactions. Addressing this gap is essential because it can provide insights into optimising strategies for managing relationships within DP&Es, ultimately leading to more resilient and sustainable networks.</p><p>There is, in particular, a need to take on an ecosystem perspective to understand these interactions comprehensively. As highligh
在当前网络经济和现代商业动态的背景下,数字平台和生态系统已经成为推动创新、竞争和增长的关键力量(Chen et al., 2021)。这些以先进技术为基础的数字化互联商业网络促进了商品、服务和信息的无缝交换,从而改变了传统行业并创造了新的经济机会(Rietveld &amp;先林,2020)。鉴于它们的突出地位,对dp&&e的研究也越来越多(Murthy &amp;Madhok, 2021)。特别是,新兴的研究强调了dp&e的兴起所带来的一些重要好处。首先,在宏观层面上,它们对不同行业和经济体的运作方式有着深远的影响,往往会彻底颠覆竞争规则、商业规范以及组成实体的战略和运营。Katila, 2023)。其次,在组织层面,通过提高企业的影响力(Recker等人,2024)以及协作和知识共享的能力(Ofe等人,2024),研发人员在促进企业创新和盈利能力方面发挥着重要作用。桑德伯格,2023)。第三,在业务和盈利能力领域之外,dp&e还可以促进跨部门协作和社会创新,突显其推动积极社会变革的潜力(罗格&amp;格兰姆斯,2022;Masiero,Arvidsson, 2021)。尽管有这些好处,正如我们在最初的论文征稿中所指出的,学者们已经确定了许多悬而未决的问题和知识空白,需要解决,以更好地理解和利用dp&&e的潜力(例如,Rietveld &;先林,2020)。我们对现有文献的集体理解表明,有三个关键领域尤其应该进一步发展。首先是需要更深入地了解dp&e内部的实体如何相互竞争、协作、补充和互动。各种实体(如平台所有者、互补者和消费者)之间的动态互动对生态系统的整体健康和成功至关重要(Zhang et al., 2022)。然而,现有的研究往往侧重于孤立的方面,如竞争或合作(例如,Chung et al., 2023;朱,Liu, 2018),而没有考虑更广泛的相互作用。解决这一差距至关重要,因为它可以为优化dpe内部关系管理策略提供见解,最终形成更具弹性和可持续性的网络。尤其需要从生态系统的角度来全面理解这些相互作用。正如Wang(2021)所强调的那样,数字生态系统类似于自然生态系统,其中不同的参与者相互依赖地相互作用。采用生态系统的观点将使我们能够超越孤立的竞争或合作行为,考虑数字技术如何整合不同参与者的努力,创造一个连贯的整体。这种整体的观点可以解决部分-整体的不平衡,确保生态系统的健康和个体实体的成功都得到优化。第二个领域涉及我们对共享经济和金融科技平台等不同类型的dpe如何在不同的背景条件和市场领域下组织成功的理解。现有文献的基本假设似乎是所有的dpe都是相似的,但肯定存在细微差别,例如,区分b谷歌的Android生态系统(例如,Karhu等人,2018)和优步的拼车生态系统(例如,Geissinger等人,2020)。然而,目前还缺乏全面的研究来比较和对比不同平台在不同行业内部和跨行业的运作方式。了解这些变化很重要,因为它可以帮助平台管理者和政策制定者设计量身定制的战略和行动,考虑每种类型平台的独特特征和挑战,从而提高其生存和成功的机会(Yoffie等人,2019)。第三个领域涉及我们对开发团队如何随着时间的推移出现、演变、收敛、分化和更新的理解。在技术进步、市场动态和监管变化的推动下,dp&e的生命周期往往以不断变化为特征(Tan et al., 2020)。然而,关于dp&e的进化过程和驱动它们的上下文力量的研究仍然很少。填补这一空白至关重要,因为它可以为管理转型、促进创新和确保dp&&e的长期可持续性提供战略信息(Wormald等人,2022)。 因此,我们非常高兴在本期特刊上发表六篇论文,为dp&&e研究的这三个关键领域提供创新和发人深省的见解。在dp&e Dynamics领域,由Gastaldi等人(2024)撰写的题为“从互惠主义到共生主义:评估互补性和数字平台之间不断发展的关系”的论文。他们以YouTube及其内容创作者为例,研究了数字平台及其互补平台之间不断变化的动态。研究发现,最初,平台和互补商之间的关系具有互惠互利的特点,双方都受益匪浅。然而,随着互补者获得经验和成熟,他们与平台的关系转向了共栖关系。在这种进化的状态下,互补者通过多样化收入流和参与多归属策略来寻求更大的独立性,从而减少对平台治理的依赖。该研究强调了互补企业对平台政策和治理的战略回应,强调了它们的创业精神和独立获取更多价值的能力。本研究对平台互补关系的演化阶段以及这些变化对平台治理和生态系统动态的影响提供了有价值的见解。关于这个主题的第二篇论文是由Kude和Huber(2025)撰写的题为“响应平台所有者的移动:对四个企业软件互补的14年定性研究”。他们的研究探讨了企业软件生态系统中的互补者如何应对不利的平台所有者行动。作者进行了一项长达14年的纵向研究,分析了四个平台合作伙伴关系中的21个移动响应实例。他们的发现揭示了三种不同的互补反应原型:坚持、支点和分离。随着时间的推移,互补者将这些原型组合成三种独特的响应模式:渐进式发散、自适应振荡和持久坚持。这些模式使互补平台能够重新稳定自己的定位,并针对未来平台所有者的变动建立弹性。该研究强调了平台所有者和互补者之间的动态相互作用,强调了后者在塑造其定位方面的代理作用,尽管存在外部挑战。本研究为理解平台合作伙伴关系的长期动态提供了有价值的见解,并为管理平台生态系统中的合作竞争提供了实际意义。在关于如何组织不同形式的合作伙伴的第二个领域,我们有Lin和Zhang(2024)发表的题为“共享经济中的供应商经验和订单选择”的论文。他们的研究探讨了供应商经验如何影响共享经济中的订单选择行为。作者将重点放在能力受限、自行安排时间和不专业的供应商上,利用了一个来自中国大型平台的专有数据集,该平台促进了家常饭菜的交流。研究表明,被拒绝的订单数量最初随着供应商经验的增加而增加,但最终随着供应商经验的增加而减少。尽管早期订单减少,但供应商的销售收入随着时间的推移而增加,这是由于旨在实现收入最大化的改进的订单选择策略。本研究对共享经济平台独特的市场行为提供了有价值的见解,强调了体验式学习在管理能力限制方面的重要性,并为在这种特定背景下运营的从业者和企业主提供了实际意义。关于这一主题的第二篇论文题为“确保金融科技平台性能的竞争策略:来自多个案例研究的证据”,由Ng和Pan(2024)撰写,研究了有助于金融科技平台成功的竞争策略。通过对中国四个成功的金融科技平台的详细分析,作者开发了一个理论框架,该框架确定了基于平台服务产品的差异化和重要性的关键策略。该研究揭示了基于这些维度的四种竞争战略组合,并强调了将战略与来自政府、市场和社会的社会压力相结合的重要性。通过研究这些策略,作者为在特定领域(即金融科技)运营的平台提供了实用的见解,以应对挑战,提高绩效并取得商业成功。最后,与第三个与开发平台如何随着时间的推移而进化和更新相关的领域保持一致,我们有一篇题为“多平台集成战略的类型学”的论文,作者是Schreieck等人(2024)。本文
{"title":"The dynamics, organisation and evolution of digital platforms and ecosystems","authors":"Barney Tan,&nbsp;Xiao Xiao,&nbsp;Michael Chau,&nbsp;Felix Ter Chian Tan,&nbsp;Carmen Leong","doi":"10.1111/isj.12548","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12548","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;Against the backdrop of the present networked economy and the dynamic landscape of modern business, digital platforms and ecosystems (DP&amp;Es) have emerged as pivotal forces driving innovation, competition, and growth (Chen et al., &lt;span&gt;2021&lt;/span&gt;). These digitally-enabled, interconnected business networks, underpinned by advanced technologies, facilitate the seamless exchange of goods, services, and information, thereby transforming traditional industries and creating new economic opportunities (Rietveld &amp; Schilling, &lt;span&gt;2020&lt;/span&gt;).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In reflection of their prominence, research on DP&amp;Es is growing (Murthy &amp; Madhok, &lt;span&gt;2021&lt;/span&gt;). In particular, the emerging research has highlighted a number of important benefits generated by the rise of DP&amp;Es. First, on a macro-level, they have profound implications for how various industries and economies function, often upending the rules of competition, business norms, as well as the strategies and operations of the constituent entities completely (Thatchenkery &amp; Katila, &lt;span&gt;2023&lt;/span&gt;). Second, at the organisational level, DP&amp;Es play a significant role in fostering innovation and profitability for businesses by improving their reach (Recker et al., &lt;span&gt;2024&lt;/span&gt;) and capacity for collaboration and knowledge sharing (Ofe &amp; Sandberg, &lt;span&gt;2023&lt;/span&gt;). Third, beyond the realm of business and profitability, DP&amp;Es can also enable cross-sector collaboration and social innovation, underscoring their potential to drive positive societal change (Logue &amp; Grimes, &lt;span&gt;2022&lt;/span&gt;; Masiero &amp; Arvidsson, &lt;span&gt;2021&lt;/span&gt;).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Despite these benefits, and as noted in our initial call for papers, scholars have identified numerous open questions and knowledge gaps that need to be addressed to better understand and leverage the potential of DP&amp;Es (e.g., Rietveld &amp; Schilling, &lt;span&gt;2020&lt;/span&gt;). Our collective understanding of the existing literature suggests that there are three critical areas in particular that should be developed further.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The first is the need for a deeper understanding of how entities within DP&amp;Es compete, collaborate, complement, and interact with one another. The dynamic interactions among various entities, such as platform owners, complementors, and consumers, are crucial for the overall health and success of the ecosystem (Zhang et al., &lt;span&gt;2022&lt;/span&gt;). However, existing research often focuses on isolated aspects, such as competition or collaboration (e.g., Chung et al., &lt;span&gt;2023&lt;/span&gt;; Zhu &amp; Liu, &lt;span&gt;2018&lt;/span&gt;), without considering the broader spectrum of interactions. Addressing this gap is essential because it can provide insights into optimising strategies for managing relationships within DP&amp;Es, ultimately leading to more resilient and sustainable networks.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;There is, in particular, a need to take on an ecosystem perspective to understand these interactions comprehensively. As highligh","PeriodicalId":48049,"journal":{"name":"Information Systems Journal","volume":"35 2","pages":"417-421"},"PeriodicalIF":6.5,"publicationDate":"2024-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/isj.12548","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143423906","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Can information and communication technology drive effective spatial governance in rural areas? Emergency of e-participation ecosystem from rural China 信息和通信技术能否推动农村地区有效的空间治理?中国农村电子参与生态系统的紧急状态
IF 6.5 2区 管理学 Q1 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Pub Date : 2024-08-15 DOI: 10.1111/isj.12550
Lei Tong, Haotian Ji, Hua Zhang, Lingxi Chen, Xiaojuan Cheng

The integration of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) in rural areas holds significant potential for facilitating active participation of villagers in spatial governance processes. While previous research has primarily focused on the role of e-participation tools in rural governance, there exists a knowledge gap regarding substantive villager participation within intricate systems. This study explores the intricate mechanism of meaningful engagement by harnessing the potential of ICT and parametric technologies. First, the concept of ‘e-participation ecosystem’ is proposed. The concept integrates ICT, parametric technology and other relevant elements necessary to facilitate substantial participation of rural villagers in spatial governance. Subsequently, an analytical framework to examine the impact mechanism of ICT technology on the efficiency of village spatial governance is developed, building upon an evaluation of villagers' active involvement. Finally, a practical demonstration was conducted in C village to validate the positive impact of ICT on rural spatial governance. This study reveals that the successful implementation of ICT in village spatial governance necessitates a comprehensive ‘e-participation ecosystem’ for support, as the efficacy of individual ICT technologies is limited. Additionally, it highlights that the utilisation of ICT can enhance efficiency in village spatial governance, thereby reducing participation costs for all stakeholders through a streamlined governance process. Moreover, parameterization technology plays an equally crucial role in the process of village spatial governance. By harnessing the power of parameterization technology, the efficiency of generating village spatial planning schemes can be significantly enhanced. When integrated with ICT technology, it has the potential to substantially reduce response time for all stakeholders involved.

信息和通信技术(ICT)在农村地区的整合具有促进村民积极参与空间治理进程的巨大潜力。虽然以前的研究主要集中在电子参与工具在农村治理中的作用,但在复杂系统中的实质性村民参与方面存在知识缺口。本研究通过利用信息通信技术和参数化技术的潜力,探索了有意义参与的复杂机制。首先,提出了“电子参与生态系统”的概念。这一概念整合了信息通信技术、参数化技术和其他必要的相关要素,以促进农村村民实质性地参与空间治理。在此基础上,构建了基于村民积极参与评价的信息通信技术对村庄空间治理效率影响机制的分析框架。最后,以C村为例,验证ICT对乡村空间治理的积极影响。研究发现,ICT在乡村空间治理中的成功实施需要一个全面的“电子参与生态系统”作为支持,因为单个ICT技术的有效性是有限的。此外,报告强调,利用信息通信技术可以提高村庄空间治理的效率,从而通过简化治理流程降低所有利益相关者的参与成本。此外,参数化技术在村庄空间治理过程中也发挥着同样重要的作用。利用参数化技术的力量,可以显著提高村庄空间规划方案的编制效率。如果与信息通信技术相结合,它有可能大大缩短所有相关利益攸关方的响应时间。
{"title":"Can information and communication technology drive effective spatial governance in rural areas? Emergency of e-participation ecosystem from rural China","authors":"Lei Tong,&nbsp;Haotian Ji,&nbsp;Hua Zhang,&nbsp;Lingxi Chen,&nbsp;Xiaojuan Cheng","doi":"10.1111/isj.12550","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12550","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The integration of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) in rural areas holds significant potential for facilitating active participation of villagers in spatial governance processes. While previous research has primarily focused on the role of e-participation tools in rural governance, there exists a knowledge gap regarding substantive villager participation within intricate systems. This study explores the intricate mechanism of meaningful engagement by harnessing the potential of ICT and parametric technologies. First, the concept of ‘e-participation ecosystem’ is proposed. The concept integrates ICT, parametric technology and other relevant elements necessary to facilitate substantial participation of rural villagers in spatial governance. Subsequently, an analytical framework to examine the impact mechanism of ICT technology on the efficiency of village spatial governance is developed, building upon an evaluation of villagers' active involvement. Finally, a practical demonstration was conducted in C village to validate the positive impact of ICT on rural spatial governance. This study reveals that the successful implementation of ICT in village spatial governance necessitates a comprehensive ‘e-participation ecosystem’ for support, as the efficacy of individual ICT technologies is limited. Additionally, it highlights that the utilisation of ICT can enhance efficiency in village spatial governance, thereby reducing participation costs for all stakeholders through a streamlined governance process. Moreover, parameterization technology plays an equally crucial role in the process of village spatial governance. By harnessing the power of parameterization technology, the efficiency of generating village spatial planning schemes can be significantly enhanced. When integrated with ICT technology, it has the potential to substantially reduce response time for all stakeholders involved.</p>","PeriodicalId":48049,"journal":{"name":"Information Systems Journal","volume":"35 2","pages":"674-709"},"PeriodicalIF":6.5,"publicationDate":"2024-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143423757","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Leveraging digital tools to foster resilience in the charity sector: The case of eBay's Charity Connect initiative 利用数字工具增强慈善部门的弹性:以eBay的慈善连接计划为例
IF 6.5 2区 管理学 Q1 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Pub Date : 2024-08-13 DOI: 10.1111/isj.12554
Michelle Richey, Jade Wendy Brooks, M. N. Ravishankar

Digital tools can help mitigate serious threats to social and economic activity created by external shocks and reduced government funding. This paper complements Information Technology for Development (IT4D) studies of resilience by focusing on how the introduction of new digital tools can sustain both economic and social activities, potentially leading to further adaptations. It investigates eBay's Charity Connect initiative, which supported the UK charity sector to continue selling donated items during the COVID-19 lockdown. The findings present three pathways-outcomes used to foster resilience through introducing new digital tools: interim resilience, bounded resilience and enhanced resilience. Using conservation of resources theory, the paper explains the difference between these outcomes and discusses how balancing stress and resource investment can help leverage digital tools and foster greater digital resilience.

数字工具可以帮助减轻外部冲击和政府资金减少对社会和经济活动造成的严重威胁。本文对信息技术促进发展(IT4D)关于复原力的研究进行了补充,重点关注了引入新的数字工具如何能够维持经济和社会活动,并可能导致进一步的适应。它调查了eBay的慈善连接倡议,该倡议支持英国慈善部门在COVID-19封锁期间继续出售捐赠物品。研究结果提出了三种途径——通过引入新的数字工具来培养弹性的结果:临时弹性、有限弹性和增强弹性。利用资源保护理论,本文解释了这些结果之间的差异,并讨论了平衡压力和资源投资如何有助于利用数字工具和培养更大的数字弹性。
{"title":"Leveraging digital tools to foster resilience in the charity sector: The case of eBay's Charity Connect initiative","authors":"Michelle Richey,&nbsp;Jade Wendy Brooks,&nbsp;M. N. Ravishankar","doi":"10.1111/isj.12554","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12554","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Digital tools can help mitigate serious threats to social and economic activity created by external shocks and reduced government funding. This paper complements Information Technology for Development (IT4D) studies of resilience by focusing on how the introduction of new digital tools can sustain both economic and social activities, potentially leading to further adaptations. It investigates eBay's Charity Connect initiative, which supported the UK charity sector to continue selling donated items during the COVID-19 lockdown. The findings present three pathways-outcomes used to foster resilience through introducing new digital tools: <i>interim resilience</i>, <i>bounded resilience</i> and <i>enhanced resilience</i>. Using conservation of resources theory, the paper explains the difference between these outcomes and discusses how balancing stress and resource investment can help leverage digital tools and foster greater digital resilience.</p>","PeriodicalId":48049,"journal":{"name":"Information Systems Journal","volume":"35 2","pages":"646-673"},"PeriodicalIF":6.5,"publicationDate":"2024-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/isj.12554","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143423581","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Making space for time: Strategies for the design of time-aware hybrid work 为时间创造空间:时间感知混合工作的设计策略
IF 6.5 2区 管理学 Q1 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Pub Date : 2024-08-12 DOI: 10.1111/isj.12552
Anastasia Griva, Leona Chandra Kruse, Monika Hattinger, Karin Högberg, Ilias O. Pappas, Kieran Conboy

Time is central to many debates about hybrid work- the impact on speed and productivity, commute times, and synchronisation of work. However, we argue that time is often over-simplified in extant hybrid work literature and tends to ignore many temporal concepts that capture the inherently complex, multi-faceted, subtle, and socially embedded nature of time. To address this issue, we conducted studies of five hybrid work teams across two large organisations. The paper contributes to current research on hybrid work by (i) illustrating the various temporal concepts that may be considered in the design of hybrid work environments, as well as the impact of considering or not considering them; (ii) illustrating how these temporal concepts in a physical space can be augmented in the digital space, rather than assuming the digital space should simply represent the physical; and (iii) providing a framework for the consideration of time–aware hybrid work. We hope to spark scientific interest in studying the temporal nuances of hybrid work but also the temporal aspects of design in other areas.

时间是许多关于混合工作的争论的核心——对速度和生产力、通勤时间和工作同步的影响。然而,我们认为,在现有的混合工作文献中,时间往往被过度简化,往往忽略了许多时间概念,这些概念捕捉了时间固有的复杂性、多面性、微妙性和社会嵌入性。为了解决这个问题,我们对两个大型组织中的五个混合工作团队进行了研究。本文通过(i)说明在混合工作环境的设计中可能考虑的各种时间概念,以及考虑或不考虑它们的影响,为当前的混合工作研究做出了贡献;(ii)说明物理空间中的这些时间概念如何在数字空间中得到增强,而不是假设数字空间应该简单地代表物理空间;以及(iii)为考虑时间感知混合工作提供框架。我们希望激发科学的兴趣,研究混合工作的时间细微差别,以及其他领域设计的时间方面。
{"title":"Making space for time: Strategies for the design of time-aware hybrid work","authors":"Anastasia Griva,&nbsp;Leona Chandra Kruse,&nbsp;Monika Hattinger,&nbsp;Karin Högberg,&nbsp;Ilias O. Pappas,&nbsp;Kieran Conboy","doi":"10.1111/isj.12552","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12552","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Time is central to many debates about hybrid work- the impact on speed and productivity, commute times, and synchronisation of work. However, we argue that time is often over-simplified in extant hybrid work literature and tends to ignore many temporal concepts that capture the inherently complex, multi-faceted, subtle, and socially embedded nature of time. To address this issue, we conducted studies of five hybrid work teams across two large organisations. The paper contributes to current research on hybrid work by (i) illustrating the various temporal concepts that may be considered in the design of hybrid work environments, as well as the impact of considering or not considering them; (ii) illustrating how these temporal concepts in a physical space can be augmented in the digital space, rather than assuming the digital space should simply represent the physical; and (iii) providing a framework for the consideration of time–aware hybrid work. We hope to spark scientific interest in studying the temporal nuances of hybrid work but also the temporal aspects of design in other areas.</p>","PeriodicalId":48049,"journal":{"name":"Information Systems Journal","volume":"35 2","pages":"611-645"},"PeriodicalIF":6.5,"publicationDate":"2024-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/isj.12552","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143423879","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The IT-driven ridesharing economy at the base of the pyramid: Unravelling the impact of uncertainty reduction on drivers' engagement in ridesharing 金字塔底层的it驱动的拼车经济:揭示不确定性降低对司机参与拼车的影响
IF 6.5 2区 管理学 Q1 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Pub Date : 2024-08-06 DOI: 10.1111/isj.12553
Xusen Cheng, Xiaoping Zhang, Xin (Robert) Luo

Despite the potential benefits for drivers at the base of the pyramid (BoP) of IT-driven ridesharing businesses, drivers are susceptible to uncertainty owing to their low education and incomes, potentially compelling them to engage less in ridesharing over time. Although this important sociotechnical phenomenon has garnered increasing attention, IS studies on this topic are scarce. Drawing on uncertainty reduction theory, we explored mechanisms for reducing BoP drivers' uncertainty and building their trust to enable them to engage in ridesharing. We identified three means of uncertainty reduction at three levels: trust in passengers, trust in ridesharing platforms, and the effectiveness of ridesharing institutional mechanisms. Using a sequential, triangulated mixed-methods approach, we conducted 30 semi-structured interviews to explore trust building with drivers and used data provided by 303 ridesharing drivers to quantitatively test the proposed research model. We found that perceived empathy and information congruity increased BoP drivers' trust in passengers, whereas effective escrow services, perceived justice, matching accuracy, and a high level of privacy control increased BoP drivers' perceived trust in ridesharing platforms, motivating them to engage more frequently with ridesharing platforms. Furthermore, the results indicated that increasing trust in both passengers and ridesharing platforms and improving the effectiveness of ridesharing institutional mechanisms can enhance BoP drivers' engagement in ridesharing. We conducted 30 follow-up interviews with BoP drivers to corroborate the quantitative results and draw robust inferences.

尽管it驱动的拼车业务对处于金字塔底层的司机有潜在的好处,但由于司机的教育程度和收入较低,他们容易受到不确定性的影响,随着时间的推移,他们可能会减少参与拼车业务。尽管这一重要的社会技术现象引起了越来越多的关注,但关于这一主题的研究却很少。利用不确定性减少理论,我们探索了降低BoP司机不确定性和建立信任的机制,使他们能够参与拼车。我们从三个层面确定了三种减少不确定性的方法:对乘客的信任,对拼车平台的信任,以及拼车制度机制的有效性。采用连续的三角混合方法,我们进行了30次半结构化访谈,以探索与司机的信任建立,并使用303名拼车司机提供的数据来定量测试所提出的研究模型。我们发现,感知同理心和信息一致性增加了BoP司机对乘客的信任,而有效的托管服务、感知公正、匹配准确性和高水平的隐私控制增加了BoP司机对拼车平台的感知信任,激励他们更频繁地使用拼车平台。此外,研究结果表明,增加乘客和拼车平台的信任以及提高拼车制度机制的有效性可以提高BoP司机对拼车的参与程度。我们对30名防喷器驾驶员进行了随访访谈,以证实定量结果并得出可靠的推论。
{"title":"The IT-driven ridesharing economy at the base of the pyramid: Unravelling the impact of uncertainty reduction on drivers' engagement in ridesharing","authors":"Xusen Cheng,&nbsp;Xiaoping Zhang,&nbsp;Xin (Robert) Luo","doi":"10.1111/isj.12553","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12553","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Despite the potential benefits for drivers at the base of the pyramid (BoP) of IT-driven ridesharing businesses, drivers are susceptible to uncertainty owing to their low education and incomes, potentially compelling them to engage less in ridesharing over time. Although this important sociotechnical phenomenon has garnered increasing attention, IS studies on this topic are scarce. Drawing on uncertainty reduction theory, we explored mechanisms for reducing BoP drivers' uncertainty and building their trust to enable them to engage in ridesharing. We identified three means of uncertainty reduction at three levels: trust in passengers, trust in ridesharing platforms, and the effectiveness of ridesharing institutional mechanisms. Using a sequential, triangulated mixed-methods approach, we conducted 30 semi-structured interviews to explore trust building with drivers and used data provided by 303 ridesharing drivers to quantitatively test the proposed research model. We found that perceived empathy and information congruity increased BoP drivers' trust in passengers, whereas effective escrow services, perceived justice, matching accuracy, and a high level of privacy control increased BoP drivers' perceived trust in ridesharing platforms, motivating them to engage more frequently with ridesharing platforms. Furthermore, the results indicated that increasing trust in both passengers and ridesharing platforms and improving the effectiveness of ridesharing institutional mechanisms can enhance BoP drivers' engagement in ridesharing. We conducted 30 follow-up interviews with BoP drivers to corroborate the quantitative results and draw robust inferences.</p>","PeriodicalId":48049,"journal":{"name":"Information Systems Journal","volume":"35 2","pages":"577-610"},"PeriodicalIF":6.5,"publicationDate":"2024-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143423707","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
How do information and communication technology platforms shape rural e-governance: The case of Zhao-lou Village on the WeCounty platform 信息通信技术平台如何塑造农村电子政务——以微县平台上的赵楼村为例
IF 6.5 2区 管理学 Q1 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI: 10.1111/isj.12551
Xiaowei Chen, Xiaojuan Cheng, Tianyu Zhang, Hongdong Guo

This study investigates the role of information and communication technology (ICT) platforms in facilitating e-governance within a rural context. A longitudinal single-case study approach was employed, involving 37 semi-structured interviews from 2019 to 2022. The findings reveal that information asymmetry and persistent tensions between the government and villagers hinder cooperative behaviour in rural governance, at varying degrees throughout all stages of e-governance. Second, a contagion effect is identified, where the government coerces non-cooperative villagers, exacerbating tensions. The coercive and negotiating-compromising mechanism enabled by ICT platforms illustrates how the ICT platform enables the contagion effect occurs during rural policy deployment. Third, the goal incongruence between the government and villagers necessitates the government's utilisation of ICT platforms to adopt active engagement and induce event that encourage goal articulation, which facilitates a better goal alignment between both parties. This approach promotes the observation of collaborative behaviour among villagers and ultimately fosters increased collaboration with the government, that is, mimicking villagers' behaviour. Meanwhile, government stimulation can effectively facilitate the interaction between government and villagers, promoting the negotiation and compromise between the two parties. Such compromises can foster the goal congruence between the two parties, consequently encouraging greater participation from villagers in rural governance. The case offers valuable insights into the mechanisms by which ICT facilitates rural e-governance, thereby holding significant implications for research on ICT-rural governance and governments grappling with challenges in implementing rural policies.

本研究探讨了信息和通信技术(ICT)平台在促进农村电子政务中的作用。采用纵向单案例研究方法,在2019年至2022年期间进行了37次半结构化访谈。研究结果表明,政府与村民之间的信息不对称和持续的紧张关系在不同程度上阻碍了农村治理中的合作行为,并贯穿于电子政务的各个阶段。其次,发现了传染效应,即政府强迫不合作的村民,加剧了紧张局势。信息通信技术平台的强制和谈判妥协机制说明了信息通信技术平台如何使农村政策部署过程中的传染效应发生。第三,政府与村民之间的目标不一致要求政府利用ICT平台采取积极参与和诱导事件,鼓励目标表达,从而促进双方更好地实现目标一致性。这种方法促进了对村民合作行为的观察,并最终促进了与政府的合作,即模仿村民的行为。同时,政府刺激可以有效地促进政府与村民之间的互动,促进双方的协商与妥协。这种妥协可以促进双方的目标一致性,从而鼓励村民更多地参与农村治理。本案例为信息通信技术促进农村电子政务的机制提供了有价值的见解,从而对信息通信技术农村治理研究和政府应对实施农村政策挑战具有重要意义。
{"title":"How do information and communication technology platforms shape rural e-governance: The case of Zhao-lou Village on the WeCounty platform","authors":"Xiaowei Chen,&nbsp;Xiaojuan Cheng,&nbsp;Tianyu Zhang,&nbsp;Hongdong Guo","doi":"10.1111/isj.12551","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12551","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study investigates the role of information and communication technology (ICT) platforms in facilitating e-governance within a rural context. A longitudinal single-case study approach was employed, involving 37 semi-structured interviews from 2019 to 2022. The findings reveal that information asymmetry and persistent tensions between the government and villagers hinder cooperative behaviour in rural governance, at varying degrees throughout all stages of e-governance. Second, a contagion effect is identified, where the government coerces non-cooperative villagers, exacerbating tensions. The coercive and negotiating-compromising mechanism enabled by ICT platforms illustrates how the ICT platform enables the contagion effect occurs during rural policy deployment. Third, the goal incongruence between the government and villagers necessitates the government's utilisation of ICT platforms to adopt active engagement and induce event that encourage goal articulation, which facilitates a better goal alignment between both parties. This approach promotes the observation of collaborative behaviour among villagers and ultimately fosters increased collaboration with the government, that is, mimicking villagers' behaviour. Meanwhile, government stimulation can effectively facilitate the interaction between government and villagers, promoting the negotiation and compromise between the two parties. Such compromises can foster the goal congruence between the two parties, consequently encouraging greater participation from villagers in rural governance. The case offers valuable insights into the mechanisms by which ICT facilitates rural e-governance, thereby holding significant implications for research on ICT-rural governance and governments grappling with challenges in implementing rural policies.</p>","PeriodicalId":48049,"journal":{"name":"Information Systems Journal","volume":"35 2","pages":"545-576"},"PeriodicalIF":6.5,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143423653","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Co-constructing cooperative value ecosystems: A critical realist perspective 共建合作价值生态系统:一个批判现实主义的视角
IF 6.5 2区 管理学 Q1 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Pub Date : 2024-07-29 DOI: 10.1111/isj.12549
Jun Zhang, Efpraxia D. Zamani, Paolo Gerli, Luca Mora

This study focuses on digital platform cooperatives (DPCs) and investigates how social value is created within platform cooperativism for fostering a more equitable and inclusive digital landscape. We explore and theorise the outcomes of social value creation by DPCs and identify the generative mechanisms that drive their emergence. We do this by adopting a Critical Realism philosophical stance, in combination with Grounded Theory techniques based on the Straussian version of coding. Our data is drawn from 36 interviews with DPC (co-)founders, members, and experts, alongside an array of documentary data from DPCs across 12 European countries. Our analysis reveals three outcomes of social value creation by DPCs: strengthening community capacities, federating cooperative ventures, and fostering practices for narrative co-creation. Additionally, we identify two generative mechanisms with enduring properties and explanatory power: collective identity and empowerment, and government-community symbiosis. These mechanisms are identified through retroductive theorising, offering plausible explanations for the outcomes of social value creation, situated within relevant contextual conditions, such as grassroots mobilisation and advocacy, institutional commitment and policy support, and legislative frameworks for cooperative integration. This study contributes to the understanding of social value creation in platform cooperativism as an endeavour to co-construct a cooperative value ecosystem, providing valuable insights for both theory and practice.

本研究的重点是数字平台合作社(dpc),并探讨如何在平台合作主义中创造社会价值,以促进更加公平和包容的数字景观。我们探索dpc创造社会价值的结果并将其理论化,并确定推动其出现的生成机制。我们通过采用批判现实主义的哲学立场,结合基于施特劳斯版本编码的扎根理论技术来做到这一点。我们的数据来自对36位DPC(联合)创始人、成员和专家的采访,以及来自12个欧洲国家DPC的一系列文献数据。我们的分析揭示了dpc创造社会价值的三个结果:加强社区能力、联合合作企业和促进叙事共同创造的实践。此外,我们确定了两种具有持久特性和解释力的生成机制:集体认同和授权,以及政府-社区共生。这些机制是通过追溯理论来确定的,在相关的背景条件下,如基层动员和倡导、机构承诺和政策支持,以及合作一体化的立法框架,为社会价值创造的结果提供了合理的解释。本研究有助于理解平台合作主义中的社会价值创造是一种共同构建合作价值生态系统的努力,为理论和实践提供有价值的见解。
{"title":"Co-constructing cooperative value ecosystems: A critical realist perspective","authors":"Jun Zhang,&nbsp;Efpraxia D. Zamani,&nbsp;Paolo Gerli,&nbsp;Luca Mora","doi":"10.1111/isj.12549","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12549","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study focuses on digital platform cooperatives (DPCs) and investigates how social value is created within platform cooperativism for fostering a more equitable and inclusive digital landscape. We explore and theorise the outcomes of social value creation by DPCs and identify the generative mechanisms that drive their emergence. We do this by adopting a Critical Realism philosophical stance, in combination with Grounded Theory techniques based on the Straussian version of coding. Our data is drawn from 36 interviews with DPC (co-)founders, members, and experts, alongside an array of documentary data from DPCs across 12 European countries. Our analysis reveals three outcomes of social value creation by DPCs: strengthening community capacities, federating cooperative ventures, and fostering practices for narrative co-creation. Additionally, we identify two generative mechanisms with enduring properties and explanatory power: collective identity and empowerment, and government-community symbiosis. These mechanisms are identified through retroductive theorising, offering plausible explanations for the outcomes of social value creation, situated within relevant contextual conditions, such as grassroots mobilisation and advocacy, institutional commitment and policy support, and legislative frameworks for cooperative integration. This study contributes to the understanding of social value creation in platform cooperativism as an endeavour to co-construct a cooperative value ecosystem, providing valuable insights for both theory and practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":48049,"journal":{"name":"Information Systems Journal","volume":"35 2","pages":"504-544"},"PeriodicalIF":6.5,"publicationDate":"2024-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/isj.12549","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143424221","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The visibility paradox: Impediment or benefit to vicarious learning in hybrid work environments? 能见度悖论:混合工作环境中替代学习的障碍还是益处?
IF 6.5 2区 管理学 Q1 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Pub Date : 2024-07-23 DOI: 10.1111/isj.12547
Myriam Benabid, Christine Abdalla Mikhaeil

Organisations have increasingly adopted enterprise social networks to mitigate the challenges of hybrid work environments for workplace learning, particularly vicarious learning. However, the improved communication visibility intended to facilitate vicarious learning may paradoxically create tensions that could potentially undermine the benefits of communication visibility, recreating the invisibility of knowledge work. Through an in-depth single qualitative case study at one of the Big Four consulting firms, which serves as a paradigmatic case for hybrid work, we explain how the visibility enabled by enterprise social networks can alleviate or impede vicarious learning in hybrid work environments. We identify three instances of the visibility paradox—performance, information overload, and availability—that create a burden on both knowledge sources and seekers. Consequently, their individual strategic responses render knowledge work invisible, thereby preventing third-parties from capitalising on the potential benefits of vicarious learning that an enterprise social network could afford.

各组织越来越多地采用企业社交网络,以减轻混合工作环境对工作场所学习,特别是替代学习的挑战。然而,旨在促进替代学习的通信可见性的提高可能会产生矛盾,从而有可能破坏通信可见性带来的好处,重新造成知识工作的不可见性。四大咨询公司之一是混合工作的典型案例,通过对该公司进行深入的单一定性案例研究,我们解释了企业社交网络所带来的可见性是如何减轻或阻碍混合工作环境中的替代学习的。我们指出了可见性悖论的三种情况--绩效、信息超载和可用性--它们给知识来源和寻求者都造成了负担。因此,他们各自的战略应对措施会使知识工作变得无形,从而阻碍第三方利用企业社交网络所能提供的替代学习的潜在好处。
{"title":"The visibility paradox: Impediment or benefit to vicarious learning in hybrid work environments?","authors":"Myriam Benabid,&nbsp;Christine Abdalla Mikhaeil","doi":"10.1111/isj.12547","DOIUrl":"10.1111/isj.12547","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Organisations have increasingly adopted enterprise social networks to mitigate the challenges of hybrid work environments for workplace learning, particularly vicarious learning. However, the improved communication visibility intended to facilitate vicarious learning may paradoxically create tensions that could potentially undermine the benefits of communication visibility, recreating the invisibility of knowledge work. Through an in-depth single qualitative case study at one of the <i>Big Four</i> consulting firms, which serves as a paradigmatic case for hybrid work, we explain how the visibility enabled by enterprise social networks can alleviate or impede vicarious learning in hybrid work environments. We identify three instances of the visibility paradox—performance, information overload, and availability—that create a burden on both knowledge sources and seekers. Consequently, their individual strategic responses render knowledge work invisible, thereby preventing third-parties from capitalising on the potential benefits of vicarious learning that an enterprise social network could afford.</p>","PeriodicalId":48049,"journal":{"name":"Information Systems Journal","volume":"35 2","pages":"480-503"},"PeriodicalIF":6.5,"publicationDate":"2024-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141812077","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Information Systems Journal
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1