首页 > 最新文献

Reading and Writing最新文献

英文 中文
Listening instead of reading: using network drawing task as a re-constructed method and measure of knowledge in mind 以听代读:将网络绘图任务作为一种重新构建的方法和衡量思维知识的标准
IF 2.5 2区 教育学 Q1 Social Sciences Pub Date : 2024-05-26 DOI: 10.1007/s11145-024-10554-3
Xuqian Chen, Yishan Zhang, Qianyue Dai

The trend of podcast and audiobook listening is on the rise, thus paving the way for a new, popular learning environment. It is crucial to deliberate on the influence of multiple-text listening comprehension. This research aimed to explore the impact of conceptual network processing on multiple-text comprehension performance from the perspective of long-term working memory (LT-WM). Additionally, it examined the sensitivity of a concept network analysis measure in facilitating the construction of conceptual structures during text listening. To this end, 128 participants were randomly assigned to four different treatment groups. These groups varied in terms of text order (theoretical text followed by applied text or vice versa) and post-listening network drawing tasks. Participants either drew concept maps using key terms specific to each text or irrelevant terms as a control group. After completing both texts, all participants were required to complete a final multi-document network drawing task. Finally, a multiple-choice delayed test was administered three days later. The findings suggest that conceptual networks in LT-WM significantly influence multiple-text comprehension performance. Furthermore, the network drawing task appears to be an effective method for reconstructing knowledge structures in LT-WM, serving as a complementary measure to the MCT in assessing listening comprehension.

播客和有声读物的收听率呈上升趋势,从而为一种新的、流行的学习环境铺平了道路。探讨多文本听力理解的影响至关重要。本研究旨在从长期工作记忆(LT-WM)的角度探讨概念网络处理对多文本听力理解能力的影响。此外,研究还考察了概念网络分析方法在促进文本听力过程中概念结构构建方面的敏感性。为此,128 名参与者被随机分配到四个不同的处理组。这些小组在文本顺序(先理论文本后应用文本或反之)和听后网络绘制任务方面各不相同。作为对照组,学员可以使用每篇课文的关键术语绘制概念图,也可以使用无关术语绘制概念图。完成两个文本后,所有参与者都必须完成最后的多文档网络绘图任务。最后,三天后进行了一次多选延迟测试。研究结果表明,LT-WM 中的概念网络对多文本理解成绩有显著影响。此外,网络绘制任务似乎是重建LT-WM中知识结构的有效方法,可作为MCT听力理解评估的补充测量方法。
{"title":"Listening instead of reading: using network drawing task as a re-constructed method and measure of knowledge in mind","authors":"Xuqian Chen, Yishan Zhang, Qianyue Dai","doi":"10.1007/s11145-024-10554-3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-024-10554-3","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The trend of podcast and audiobook listening is on the rise, thus paving the way for a new, popular learning environment. It is crucial to deliberate on the influence of multiple-text listening comprehension. This research aimed to explore the impact of conceptual network processing on multiple-text comprehension performance from the perspective of long-term working memory (LT-WM). Additionally, it examined the sensitivity of a concept network analysis measure in facilitating the construction of conceptual structures during text listening. To this end, 128 participants were randomly assigned to four different treatment groups. These groups varied in terms of text order (theoretical text followed by applied text or vice versa) and post-listening network drawing tasks. Participants either drew concept maps using key terms specific to each text or irrelevant terms as a control group. After completing both texts, all participants were required to complete a final multi-document network drawing task. Finally, a multiple-choice delayed test was administered three days later. The findings suggest that conceptual networks in LT-WM significantly influence multiple-text comprehension performance. Furthermore, the network drawing task appears to be an effective method for reconstructing knowledge structures in LT-WM, serving as a complementary measure to the MCT in assessing listening comprehension.</p>","PeriodicalId":48204,"journal":{"name":"Reading and Writing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141165918","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A simple view of reading analysis of Spanish-speaking multi-language learners and proficient English speakers 对讲西班牙语的多语言学习者和精通英语者进行阅读分析的简单视角
IF 2.5 2区 教育学 Q1 Social Sciences Pub Date : 2024-05-25 DOI: 10.1007/s11145-024-10558-z
Ifeoluwa A. Popoola, Janna Brown McClain, Emily A. Farris, Timothy N. Odegard

Shifting demographics in K-12 schools have increased Spanish-speaking Multi-Language Learners’ (MLLs’) enrollment across the United States. While literacy variations between MLLs and proficient English speakers have been studied predominantly with upper elementary students, there remains a need for more exploration among early elementary Spanish-speaking MLLs in English-dominant settings. Leveraging universal screening data from a Southern U.S. state, students were categorized into literacy profiles based on the simple view of reading (SVR) using end-of-kindergarten listening comprehension and start-of-first-grade decoding measures. We aimed to explore possible differences in the distribution of MLLs and English-proficient students across these literacy profiles. Additionally, we analyzed performance levels in phonemic awareness, letter knowledge, and vocabulary. Our exploration aimed to discern potential differences in these skills between MLLs and proficient English-speaking students and determine if literacy profile membership mediated any observed differences. Analyses showed distinct distributions of MMLs and proficient English speakers across SVR-derived literacy profiles. Also, proficient speakers demonstrated higher proficiency in early literacy skills than MLLs, except in letter knowledge, a main effect that did not interact with literacy profile membership. Our findings underscore the importance of enriching MLLs’ language experiences and prioritizing vocabulary-building activities. Furthermore, they catalyze discussions on accommodating diverse MLL profiles, ensuring equitable educational access, and addressing the comprehensive language learning needs of MLLs in both oral and written language.

随着 K-12 学校人口结构的变化,全美讲西班牙语的多语言学习者(MLLs)入学人数不断增加。虽然人们主要针对小学高年级学生研究了多语种学习者与精通英语者之间的读写能力差异,但仍需要对英语占主导地位的小学低年级西班牙语多语种学习者进行更多的探索。我们利用美国南部一个州的普遍筛查数据,采用幼儿园结束时的听力理解和一年级开始时的解码测量方法,根据简单阅读观(SVR)将学生划分为不同的读写能力类别。我们的目的是探索在这些读写概况中,MLLs 和英语熟练学生的分布可能存在的差异。此外,我们还分析了学生在音位意识、字母知识和词汇方面的表现水平。我们的探索旨在发现母语为英语的学生和英语熟练的学生在这些技能方面的潜在差异,并确定读写能力特征成员资格是否对任何观察到的差异起中介作用。分析表明,在 SVR 派生的识字特征中,多语种学生和精通英语学生的分布截然不同。此外,除了字母知识外,精通英语的学生在早期识字技能方面的熟练程度高于精通英语的学生,而这一主效应与识字档案成员资格并无相互作用。我们的研究结果强调了丰富多边语言学习者的语言经验和优先开展词汇积累活动的重要性。此外,这些研究结果还促进了有关适应不同的多语言学习者特征、确保公平的教育机会以及满足多语言学习者在口头和书面语言方面的全面语言学习需求的讨论。
{"title":"A simple view of reading analysis of Spanish-speaking multi-language learners and proficient English speakers","authors":"Ifeoluwa A. Popoola, Janna Brown McClain, Emily A. Farris, Timothy N. Odegard","doi":"10.1007/s11145-024-10558-z","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-024-10558-z","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Shifting demographics in K-12 schools have increased Spanish-speaking Multi-Language Learners’ (MLLs’) enrollment across the United States. While literacy variations between MLLs and proficient English speakers have been studied predominantly with upper elementary students, there remains a need for more exploration among early elementary Spanish-speaking MLLs in English-dominant settings. Leveraging universal screening data from a Southern U.S. state, students were categorized into literacy profiles based on the simple view of reading (SVR) using end-of-kindergarten listening comprehension and start-of-first-grade decoding measures. We aimed to explore possible differences in the distribution of MLLs and English-proficient students across these literacy profiles. Additionally, we analyzed performance levels in phonemic awareness, letter knowledge, and vocabulary. Our exploration aimed to discern potential differences in these skills between MLLs and proficient English-speaking students and determine if literacy profile membership mediated any observed differences. Analyses showed distinct distributions of MMLs and proficient English speakers across SVR-derived literacy profiles. Also, proficient speakers demonstrated higher proficiency in early literacy skills than MLLs, except in letter knowledge, a main effect that did not interact with literacy profile membership. Our findings underscore the importance of enriching MLLs’ language experiences and prioritizing vocabulary-building activities. Furthermore, they catalyze discussions on accommodating diverse MLL profiles, ensuring equitable educational access, and addressing the comprehensive language learning needs of MLLs in both oral and written language.</p>","PeriodicalId":48204,"journal":{"name":"Reading and Writing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141153926","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Longitudinal relations between literacy instruction and early reading achievement: findings from classroom observations in Grades 1–3 识字教学与早期阅读成绩之间的纵向关系:1-3 年级课堂观察结果
IF 2.5 2区 教育学 Q1 Social Sciences Pub Date : 2024-05-24 DOI: 10.1007/s11145-024-10556-1
Yucheng Cao, Y. Kim
{"title":"Longitudinal relations between literacy instruction and early reading achievement: findings from classroom observations in Grades 1–3","authors":"Yucheng Cao, Y. Kim","doi":"10.1007/s11145-024-10556-1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-024-10556-1","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":48204,"journal":{"name":"Reading and Writing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141102246","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Predictors of Chinese reading in Chinese monolingual and Chinese–English bilingual children in Mainland China 中国大陆汉语单语和汉英双语儿童中文阅读的预测因素
IF 2.5 2区 教育学 Q1 Social Sciences Pub Date : 2024-05-24 DOI: 10.1007/s11145-024-10552-5
Xuan Zang, Y. Wong, Kit‐ling Lau
{"title":"Predictors of Chinese reading in Chinese monolingual and Chinese–English bilingual children in Mainland China","authors":"Xuan Zang, Y. Wong, Kit‐ling Lau","doi":"10.1007/s11145-024-10552-5","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-024-10552-5","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":48204,"journal":{"name":"Reading and Writing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141098765","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comparing Tier 1 reading instruction with Tier 3 or special education intervention through an observational snapshot of school-implemented response to intervention across Grades 1–5 通过观察一至五年级学校实施的反应干预,比较第一级阅读教学与第三级或特殊教育干预
IF 2.5 2区 教育学 Q1 Social Sciences Pub Date : 2024-05-20 DOI: 10.1007/s11145-024-10534-7
Stephanie Al Otaiba, Jennifer Stewart, W. van Dijk, Carlin L. Conner, Dayna Russell Freudenthal, Brenna K. Rivas, P. Yovanoff, J. Allor
{"title":"Comparing Tier 1 reading instruction with Tier 3 or special education intervention through an observational snapshot of school-implemented response to intervention across Grades 1–5","authors":"Stephanie Al Otaiba, Jennifer Stewart, W. van Dijk, Carlin L. Conner, Dayna Russell Freudenthal, Brenna K. Rivas, P. Yovanoff, J. Allor","doi":"10.1007/s11145-024-10534-7","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-024-10534-7","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":48204,"journal":{"name":"Reading and Writing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141122947","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Linguistically-driven text formatting improves reading comprehension for ELLs and EL1s 语言驱动的文本格式设计可提高英语语言学习者和英语一年级学生的阅读理解能力
IF 2.5 2区 教育学 Q1 Social Sciences Pub Date : 2024-05-12 DOI: 10.1007/s11145-024-10548-1
Jack Dempsey, Kiel Christianson, Julie A. Van Dyke

Typical print formatting provides no information regarding the linguistic features of a text, although texts vary considerably with respect to grammatical complexity and readability. Complex texts may be particularly challenging for individuals with weak language knowledge, such as English language learners. This paper investigates the usefulness of a text format referred to as Linguistically-Driven Text Formatting (LDTF), which provides visual cues to grammatical structure for in-the-moment language support during reading. We assessed reading comprehension in adult English Language Learners after a two-session exposure to the new format (also called Cascade Format). Participants’ primary languages were Mandarin and Korean, which have substantially different syntactic structures from English. Ninety participants (30 L1 English, 30 L1 Mandarin, 30 L1 Korean) were randomly assigned to either the traditional or the LDTF format and read six English passages across two sessions within the same week. Comprehension was assessed via questions that probe sentence comprehension and global text properties. Participants also completed a TOEFL assessment, presented in either LDTF or traditional format. Bayesian analyses showed that the Cascade Format improved sentence comprehension relative to control participants for all language groups and experience levels. Effects on the TOEFL assessment, which taps inferencing and meta-linguistic skills, were not observed. Syntactic knowledge plays a fundamental role in reading comprehension, and LDTF appears to support comprehension by providing visual cues to this knowledge that can be used at the very moment of meaning construction.

尽管文本在语法复杂程度和可读性方面存在很大差异,但典型的印刷格式并不提供有关文本语言特点的信息。对于语言知识薄弱的人,如英语学习者来说,复杂的文本尤其具有挑战性。本文研究了一种被称为 "语言驱动文本格式"(LDTF)的文本格式的实用性,这种格式提供了语法结构的视觉提示,可在阅读过程中提供即时语言支持。我们评估了成年英语学习者在接触这种新格式(也称为级联格式)两课时后的阅读理解能力。参与者的主要语言是普通话和韩语,这两种语言的句法结构与英语有很大不同。90 名参与者(30 名以英语为母语,30 名以普通话为母语,30 名以韩语为母语)被随机分配到传统格式或 LDTF 格式中,并在同一周内分两次阅读六个英语段落。理解能力通过探究句子理解和整体文本属性的问题进行评估。受试者还完成了托福考试评估,评估结果以 LDTF 或传统格式呈现。贝叶斯分析表明,与对照组学员相比,级联格式提高了所有语言组和经验水平学员的句子理解能力。但对托福考试(TOEFL)的影响却没有观察到,托福考试考察的是推理能力和元语言能力。句法知识在阅读理解中起着根本性的作用,而 LDTF 似乎可以通过提供视觉线索来帮助理解,这种视觉线索可以在意义建构时使用。
{"title":"Linguistically-driven text formatting improves reading comprehension for ELLs and EL1s","authors":"Jack Dempsey, Kiel Christianson, Julie A. Van Dyke","doi":"10.1007/s11145-024-10548-1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-024-10548-1","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Typical print formatting provides no information regarding the linguistic features of a text, although texts vary considerably with respect to grammatical complexity and readability. Complex texts may be particularly challenging for individuals with weak language knowledge, such as English language learners. This paper investigates the usefulness of a text format referred to as Linguistically-Driven Text Formatting (LDTF), which provides visual cues to grammatical structure for in-the-moment language support during reading. We assessed reading comprehension in adult English Language Learners after a two-session exposure to the new format (also called Cascade Format). Participants’ primary languages were Mandarin and Korean, which have substantially different syntactic structures from English. Ninety participants (30 L1 English, 30 L1 Mandarin, 30 L1 Korean) were randomly assigned to either the traditional or the LDTF format and read six English passages across two sessions within the same week. Comprehension was assessed via questions that probe sentence comprehension and global text properties. Participants also completed a TOEFL assessment, presented in either LDTF or traditional format. Bayesian analyses showed that the Cascade Format improved sentence comprehension relative to control participants for all language groups and experience levels. Effects on the TOEFL assessment, which taps inferencing and meta-linguistic skills, were not observed. Syntactic knowledge plays a fundamental role in reading comprehension, and LDTF appears to support comprehension by providing visual cues to this knowledge that can be used at the very moment of meaning construction.</p>","PeriodicalId":48204,"journal":{"name":"Reading and Writing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140927090","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Preschool teachers’ literacy beliefs, their evaluations of children’s writing, and their recommendations for ways to support it 学前教师的识字理念、他们对儿童写作的评价以及他们对支持儿童写作的方法的建议
IF 2.5 2区 教育学 Q1 Social Sciences Pub Date : 2024-05-06 DOI: 10.1007/s11145-024-10549-0
Shira Besser-Biron, Deborah Bergman Deitcher, Adi Elimelech, Dorit Aram

Preschool teachers’ literacy-related beliefs and literacy knowledge relate to their educational practices and preschoolers’ literacy skills. In this light, we explored how preschool teachers’ beliefs regarding early literacy and its promotion predict their knowledge, reflected in how they evaluate three young children’s writing products and their recommendations for ways to promote these children’s writing, taking into consideration teacher and classroom variables (teacher training, preschool age group, and preschool SES). Participants were 110 teachers of preschoolers (aged 4–6). The teachers completed a literacy beliefs questionnaire. They were then presented with three products written by anonymous 5.5-year-old preschoolers, representing three writing levels: initial, intermediate, and advanced, and asked what each child knows about writing and recommendations for how they can be promoted. Responses were coded for the following aspects: letters, phonology, orthography, the writing system, and composing. Results showed that preschool teachers believe children’s early literacy and its promotion are important, and that these beliefs predicted some of their evaluations and recommendations. In the evaluations, the teachers did not relate at all to composing. They related primarily to letters and phonology, both in their assessments of the children’s knowledge and their recommendations for promoting the children’s writing. At more advanced writing levels, they also related to Hebrew orthography and the writing system, and made recommendations regarding these aspects. The study suggests that preschool teachers should be encouraged to incorporate composing and more complex aspects of writing into their writing activities and instruction.

学前教师的识字相关信念和识字知识与他们的教育实践和学前儿童的识字技能有关。有鉴于此,我们探讨了学前教师对早期识字及其促进的信念如何预测他们的知识,这些知识反映在他们如何评价三名幼儿的写作产品,以及他们对促进这些幼儿写作的方法的建议中,同时考虑到教师和课堂变量(教师培训、学前儿童年龄组和学前儿童社会经济地位)。110 名学龄前儿童(4-6 岁)的教师参加了此次研究。教师们填写了一份识字信念问卷。然后,向他们展示了匿名的 5.5 岁学龄前儿童所写的三件作品,分别代表三个写作水平:初级、中级和高级。回答按以下方面进行了编码:字母、语音、正字法、书写系统和作文。结果表明,学前教师认为儿童早期识字和促进儿童早期识字非常重要,这些信念预示着他们的一些评价和建议。在评价中,教师完全不涉及作文。在对儿童知识的评估和促进儿童写作的建议中,他们主要涉及字母和语音。在较高的写作水平上,他们还涉及希伯来语正字法和写作系统,并就这些方面提出了建议。本研究建议,应鼓励学前教师在其写作活动和教学中纳入作文和更复杂的写作内容。
{"title":"Preschool teachers’ literacy beliefs, their evaluations of children’s writing, and their recommendations for ways to support it","authors":"Shira Besser-Biron, Deborah Bergman Deitcher, Adi Elimelech, Dorit Aram","doi":"10.1007/s11145-024-10549-0","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-024-10549-0","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Preschool teachers’ literacy-related beliefs and literacy knowledge relate to their educational practices and preschoolers’ literacy skills. In this light, we explored how preschool teachers’ beliefs regarding early literacy and its promotion predict their knowledge, reflected in how they evaluate three young children’s writing products and their recommendations for ways to promote these children’s writing, taking into consideration teacher and classroom variables (teacher training, preschool age group, and preschool SES). Participants were 110 teachers of preschoolers (aged 4–6). The teachers completed a literacy beliefs questionnaire. They were then presented with three products written by anonymous 5.5-year-old preschoolers, representing three writing levels: initial, intermediate, and advanced, and asked what each child knows about writing and recommendations for how they can be promoted. Responses were coded for the following aspects: letters, phonology, orthography, the writing system, and composing. Results showed that preschool teachers believe children’s early literacy and its promotion are important, and that these beliefs predicted some of their evaluations and recommendations. In the evaluations, the teachers did not relate at all to composing. They related primarily to letters and phonology, both in their assessments of the children’s knowledge and their recommendations for promoting the children’s writing. At more advanced writing levels, they also related to Hebrew orthography and the writing system, and made recommendations regarding these aspects. The study suggests that preschool teachers should be encouraged to incorporate composing and more complex aspects of writing into their writing activities and instruction.</p>","PeriodicalId":48204,"journal":{"name":"Reading and Writing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140883562","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Mathematics-writing synthesis: Kindergarten through Grade 12 mathematics-writing outcomes and instructional methods 数学写作综合法:幼儿园至十二年级数学写作成果和教学方法
IF 2.5 2区 教育学 Q1 Social Sciences Pub Date : 2024-05-03 DOI: 10.1007/s11145-024-10530-x
Tessa L. Arsenault, Sarah R. Powell, Sarah G. King

In the last decade, researchers have focused more on how to provide instructional supports for mathematics writing (Powell et al., 2017). In this synthesis, we examined 22 studies about mathematics writing to determine the overall mathematics-writing and mathematics outcomes of mathematics-writing instruction, the mathematics-writing and mathematics outcomes based on study and instructional features, the methods used within mathematics-writing instruction, and the methods used within studies involving students with mathematics difficulty (MD). We conducted a comprehensive review of peer-reviewed studies, published since 2000, focused on instruction in mathematics writing in Kindergarten through Grade 12. We included studies with and without students with MD. Results demonstrated positive student outcomes for mathematics-writing instruction. Furthermore, instructional methods for mathematics writing frequently aligned with practices used for mathematics instruction and writing instruction. Although we identified positive outcomes related to mathematics-writing instruction, and we would recommend for practitioners to provide instruction in mathematics writing, results should be interpreted with caution. Additional high-quality research on mathematics-writing instruction is needed to verify and extend on the results from this synthesis.

近十年来,研究人员更加关注如何为数学写作提供教学支持(Powell 等人,2017)。在本综述中,我们考察了 22 项有关数学写作的研究,以确定数学写作教学的总体数学写作和数学成果、基于研究和教学特点的数学写作和数学成果、数学写作教学中使用的方法以及涉及数学困难学生(MD)的研究中使用的方法。我们对 2000 年以来发表的同行评审研究进行了全面回顾,这些研究侧重于幼儿园至 12 年级的数学写作教学。我们纳入了有数学困难学生和没有数学困难学生的研究。研究结果表明,数学写作教学对学生产生了积极的影响。此外,数学写作的教学方法经常与数学教学和写作教学的实践相一致。尽管我们发现了数学写作教学的积极成果,并建议从业人员提供数学写作教学,但在解释结果时应谨慎。我们需要对数学写作教学进行更多高质量的研究,以验证和扩展本综述的结果。
{"title":"Mathematics-writing synthesis: Kindergarten through Grade 12 mathematics-writing outcomes and instructional methods","authors":"Tessa L. Arsenault, Sarah R. Powell, Sarah G. King","doi":"10.1007/s11145-024-10530-x","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-024-10530-x","url":null,"abstract":"<p>In the last decade, researchers have focused more on how to provide instructional supports for mathematics writing (Powell et al., 2017). In this synthesis, we examined 22 studies about mathematics writing to determine the overall mathematics-writing and mathematics outcomes of mathematics-writing instruction, the mathematics-writing and mathematics outcomes based on study and instructional features, the methods used within mathematics-writing instruction, and the methods used within studies involving students with mathematics difficulty (MD). We conducted a comprehensive review of peer-reviewed studies, published since 2000, focused on instruction in mathematics writing in Kindergarten through Grade 12. We included studies with and without students with MD. Results demonstrated positive student outcomes for mathematics-writing instruction. Furthermore, instructional methods for mathematics writing frequently aligned with practices used for mathematics instruction and writing instruction. Although we identified positive outcomes related to mathematics-writing instruction, and we would recommend for practitioners to provide instruction in mathematics writing, results should be interpreted with caution. Additional high-quality research on mathematics-writing instruction is needed to verify and extend on the results from this synthesis.</p>","PeriodicalId":48204,"journal":{"name":"Reading and Writing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140883566","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Correction: Literacy instruction from afar: evidencefor the effectiveness of a remotely delivered language-rich reading programme 更正:远距离识字教学:远程提供语言丰富的阅读课程的有效性证据
IF 2.5 2区 教育学 Q1 Social Sciences Pub Date : 2024-04-27 DOI: 10.1007/s11145-024-10546-3
Cameron Downing, Gwennant Evans-Jones, Simone Lira Calabrich, Caspar Wynne, Rachel Cartin, Joanna Dunton, Ruth Elliott, Markéta Caravolas, Charles Hulme, Manon Jones
{"title":"Correction: Literacy instruction from afar: evidencefor the effectiveness of a remotely delivered language-rich reading programme","authors":"Cameron Downing, Gwennant Evans-Jones, Simone Lira Calabrich, Caspar Wynne, Rachel Cartin, Joanna Dunton, Ruth Elliott, Markéta Caravolas, Charles Hulme, Manon Jones","doi":"10.1007/s11145-024-10546-3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-024-10546-3","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":48204,"journal":{"name":"Reading and Writing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140805571","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The contributions of transcription skills to paper-based and computer-based text composing in the early years 誊写技能对早年纸质和电脑文本写作的贡献
IF 2.5 2区 教育学 Q1 Social Sciences Pub Date : 2024-04-20 DOI: 10.1007/s11145-024-10543-6
Anabela Anabela Malpique, Mustafa Asil, Deborah Pino-Pasternak, Susan Ledger, Timothy Teo

Digital tools are an integral part of most writing communities across the globe, enhancing the criticality of gaining a comprehensive understanding of both paper and computer-based writing acquisition and development. The relationships between transcription skills and children’s paper-based writing performance are well documented. Less is known about the relationships between transcription skills and children’s computer-based writing performance. In this study, we examined the unique contributions of transcription skills (i.e., handwriting automaticity, keyboarding automaticity and spelling) in predicting Grade 2 students (N = 544) paper-based and computer-based writing performance (i.e., compositional quality and productivity) after controlling for other student-level factors (i.e., gender, word reading, reading comprehension, and attitudes towards writing) and classroom-level factors (i.e., amount of time teaching handwriting, keyboarding, and spelling). Multilevel modelling showed that, compared to handwriting automaticity, spelling skills accounted for a larger percentage of unique variance in predicting paper-based compositional quality; handwriting automaticity accounted for a larger percentage of unique variance in explaining paper-based compositional productivity. Findings further showed that keyboarding automaticity accounted for a larger percentage of unique variance in students’ computer-based compositional quality and productivity when compared to spelling. Gender and word reading skills were also found to be uniquely related to students’ writing performance across modalities. These findings underscore the need for educators to address and nurture the automaticity of inscription and spelling skills to enhance students' compositional quality and productivity, whether in traditional paperbased or computer-based text composing.

数字工具是全球大多数写作社区不可或缺的一部分,因此全面了解纸质和计算机写作的习得和发展至关重要。转录技能与儿童纸质写作成绩之间的关系已被充分记录。而转录技能与儿童电脑写作成绩之间的关系则鲜为人知。在本研究中,我们考察了转录技能(即手写自动性、键盘输入自动性和拼写)在预测二年级学生(人数=544)纸质和计算机写作成绩(即作文质量和生产率)方面的独特贡献,并控制了其他学生层面的因素(即性别、单词阅读、阅读理解和写作态度)和课堂层面的因素(即手写、键盘输入和拼写教学时间)。多层次建模显示,与手写自动性相比,拼写技能在预测纸质作文质量方面所占的独特变异比例更大;手写自动性在解释纸质作文生产率方面所占的独特变异比例更大。研究结果进一步表明,与拼写相比,键盘输入的自动性在学生的计算机作文质量和写作能力中占较大比例。研究还发现,性别和单词阅读能力也与学生在不同模式下的写作表现有独特的关系。这些研究结果突出表明,无论是传统的纸质文本写作还是计算机文本写作,教育工作者都有必要解决和培养学生的自动题词和拼写技能,以提高学生的作文质量和写作效率。
{"title":"The contributions of transcription skills to paper-based and computer-based text composing in the early years","authors":"Anabela Anabela Malpique, Mustafa Asil, Deborah Pino-Pasternak, Susan Ledger, Timothy Teo","doi":"10.1007/s11145-024-10543-6","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-024-10543-6","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Digital tools are an integral part of most writing communities across the globe, enhancing the criticality of gaining a comprehensive understanding of both paper and computer-based writing acquisition and development. The relationships between transcription skills and children’s paper-based writing performance are well documented. Less is known about the relationships between transcription skills and children’s computer-based writing performance. In this study, we examined the unique contributions of transcription skills (i.e., handwriting automaticity, keyboarding automaticity and spelling) in predicting Grade 2 students (N = 544) paper-based and computer-based writing performance (i.e., compositional quality and productivity) after controlling for other student-level factors (i.e., gender, word reading, reading comprehension, and attitudes towards writing) and classroom-level factors (i.e., amount of time teaching handwriting, keyboarding, and spelling). Multilevel modelling showed that, compared to handwriting automaticity, spelling skills accounted for a larger percentage of unique variance in predicting paper-based compositional quality; handwriting automaticity accounted for a larger percentage of unique variance in explaining paper-based compositional productivity. Findings further showed that keyboarding automaticity accounted for a larger percentage of unique variance in students’ computer-based compositional quality and productivity when compared to spelling. Gender and word reading skills were also found to be uniquely related to students’ writing performance across modalities. These findings underscore the need for educators to address and nurture the automaticity of inscription and spelling skills to enhance students' compositional quality and productivity, whether in traditional paperbased or computer-based text composing.</p>","PeriodicalId":48204,"journal":{"name":"Reading and Writing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140624806","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Reading and Writing
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1