首页 > 最新文献

Reading and Writing最新文献

英文 中文
A longitudinal eye-movement study of text-diagram integrative processing during multimedia reading among upper elementary children 小学高年级儿童在多媒体阅读过程中进行文字图表整合处理的眼动纵向研究
IF 2.5 2区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2024-03-26 DOI: 10.1007/s11145-023-10509-0
Yu-Cin Jian, Leo Yuk Ting Cheung

This study aimed to investigate whether elementary school students have different reading strategies based on various levels of text-diagram integrative processing and whether these reading strategies remain consistent or change over a three-year period. The study followed 176 students from grades four to six and observed their eye movements while reading scientific texts. Data were collected once each year. Text-diagram integrative behavior was analyzed using various eye-movement indicators. The number of saccades between the text and diagram was evaluated, as well as the total fixation durations of the longest eye-fixation run that stayed within the paragraph and diagram regions and the remaining eye-fixation runs on the same regions. A separate K-means cluster analysis was conducted on two different text sets (one identical and the other different across grades) to identify three reading strategy patterns at each grade level. The results showed that those associated with integrative processing (i.e., the “integrative group”) constituted a minority across grades (16–25% of students), followed closely by those focusing largely on the main text (“textual group”) (17–28%). The latter group showed a strong motivation to read but failed to utilize the diagrams for knowledge construction. The majority of the students (52–67%) were categorized into the “shallow group,” which showed a relative weakness in both integrative processing and intensive text reading. There was greater consistency in group assignments for individual students between the two text sets within a given year (63% on average) compared to across grade levels (30%), suggesting the instability of reading strategies over time. A growing trend in integrative processing toward higher grades was not observed.

本研究旨在探讨小学生在不同的文本图表综合处理水平上是否有不同的阅读策略,以及这些阅读策略在三年的时间里是保持一致还是有所变化。研究跟踪了 176 名四至六年级的学生,观察他们在阅读科学文章时的眼球运动。每年收集一次数据。研究使用各种眼动指标对文本图表整合行为进行了分析。我们评估了文字和图表之间的眼球移动次数,以及停留在段落和图表区域内的最长眼球定点移动和停留在相同区域内的其余眼球定点移动的总定点持续时间。我们对两个不同的文本集(一个相同,另一个不同年级)进行了单独的 K-means 聚类分析,以确定每个年级的三种阅读策略模式。结果显示,与综合处理相关的学生(即 "综合组")在各年级中占少数(16%-25%),紧随其后的是主要关注正文的学生("正文组")(17%-28%)。后一类学生有强烈的阅读动机,但未能利用图表进行知识建构。大多数学生(52-67%)被归入 "浅层组",他们在综合处理和文本精读方面都相对较弱。与不同年级(30%)的学生相比,两套课文在同一年级(平均 63%)的学生分组情况更为一致,这表明阅读策略随着时间的推移具有不稳定性。没有观察到综合处理在高年级有增长的趋势。
{"title":"A longitudinal eye-movement study of text-diagram integrative processing during multimedia reading among upper elementary children","authors":"Yu-Cin Jian, Leo Yuk Ting Cheung","doi":"10.1007/s11145-023-10509-0","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-023-10509-0","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study aimed to investigate whether elementary school students have different reading strategies based on various levels of text-diagram integrative processing and whether these reading strategies remain consistent or change over a three-year period. The study followed 176 students from grades four to six and observed their eye movements while reading scientific texts. Data were collected once each year. Text-diagram integrative behavior was analyzed using various eye-movement indicators. The number of saccades between the text and diagram was evaluated, as well as the total fixation durations of the longest eye-fixation run that stayed within the paragraph and diagram regions and the remaining eye-fixation runs on the same regions. A separate K-means cluster analysis was conducted on two different text sets (one identical and the other different across grades) to identify three reading strategy patterns at each grade level. The results showed that those associated with integrative processing (i.e., the “integrative group”) constituted a minority across grades (16–25% of students), followed closely by those focusing largely on the main text (“textual group”) (17–28%). The latter group showed a strong motivation to read but failed to utilize the diagrams for knowledge construction. The majority of the students (52–67%) were categorized into the “shallow group,” which showed a relative weakness in both integrative processing and intensive text reading. There was greater consistency in group assignments for individual students between the two text sets within a given year (63% on average) compared to across grade levels (30%), suggesting the instability of reading strategies over time. A growing trend in integrative processing toward higher grades was not observed.</p>","PeriodicalId":48204,"journal":{"name":"Reading and Writing","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140301132","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Sensitivity to morphological spelling regularities in Chinese-English bilinguals and English monolinguals 汉英双语者和英语单语者对形态拼写规律的敏感性
IF 2.5 2区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2024-03-23 DOI: 10.1007/s11145-024-10523-w

Abstract

Evidence of sensitivity to graphotactic and morphological patterns in English spelling has been extensively examined in monolinguals. Comparatively few studies have examined bilinguals’ sensitivity to spelling regularities. The present study compared late Chinese-English bilinguals and English monolinguals on their sensitivity to systematic inflectional and derivational spelling regularities. One hundred and twenty-nine undergraduate students completed a forced-choice spelling task, in which nonword pairs were presented in a sentence context requiring a choice of the relevant grammatical form. English ability measures were administered to examine possible inter-individual differences in morphological sensitivity. The results showed that both monolingual and bilingual participants demonstrated knowledge of spelling patterns, but the groups differed in their sensitivity to inflectional and derivational spelling regularities. Specifically, bilinguals showed more consistent use of morphological spelling regularities in guiding their decision on spelling choice compared to monolinguals. The results are argued to be consistent with the predictions of statistical learning accounts of spelling acquisition.

摘要 对英语拼写中的图形学和形态学模式的敏感性的证据已经在单语者中进行了广泛的研究。相对而言,很少有研究考察双语者对拼写规律的敏感性。本研究比较了晚期汉英双语者和英语单语者对系统词缀和派生词拼写规律性的敏感性。129名本科生完成了一项强迫选择拼写任务,在该任务中,非词对出现在一个要求选择相关语法形式的句子语境中。他们还进行了英语能力测试,以研究个体间在词形敏感性方面可能存在的差异。结果表明,单语和双语参与者都表现出对拼写模式的了解,但两组对转折词和派生词拼写规律的敏感度不同。具体来说,与单语者相比,双语者在决定拼写选择时更一致地使用形态拼写规律。这些结果与拼写习得的统计学习理论的预测是一致的。
{"title":"Sensitivity to morphological spelling regularities in Chinese-English bilinguals and English monolinguals","authors":"","doi":"10.1007/s11145-024-10523-w","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-024-10523-w","url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Abstract</h3> <p>Evidence of sensitivity to graphotactic and morphological patterns in English spelling has been extensively examined in monolinguals. Comparatively few studies have examined bilinguals’ sensitivity to spelling regularities. The present study compared late Chinese-English bilinguals and English monolinguals on their sensitivity to systematic inflectional and derivational spelling regularities. One hundred and twenty-nine undergraduate students completed a forced-choice spelling task, in which nonword pairs were presented in a sentence context requiring a choice of the relevant grammatical form. English ability measures were administered to examine possible inter-individual differences in morphological sensitivity. The results showed that both monolingual and bilingual participants demonstrated knowledge of spelling patterns, but the groups differed in their sensitivity to inflectional and derivational spelling regularities. Specifically, bilinguals showed more consistent use of morphological spelling regularities in guiding their decision on spelling choice compared to monolinguals. The results are argued to be consistent with the predictions of statistical learning accounts of spelling acquisition.</p>","PeriodicalId":48204,"journal":{"name":"Reading and Writing","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140201254","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
How orthographic knowledge is related to efficient word reading? Testing competing hypotheses 正字法知识与高效单词阅读有何关系?检验相互竞争的假设
IF 2.5 2区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2024-03-23 DOI: 10.1007/s11145-024-10525-8

Abstract

This study aims to explore the relations of phonological awareness and rapid naming with efficient word reading. Our work builds on the strong evidence base of associations between phonological awareness, rapid naming, orthographic knowledge, and efficient word reading. Specifically, we tested a pathway linking phonological awareness to orthographic knowledge and on to efficient word reading and a pathway linking rapid naming to orthographic knowledge and on to efficient word reading,, following on the self-teaching (Share in Cognition 55(2):151–218, 1995. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(94)00645-2) and rapid naming hypotheses (Wolf & Bowers in J Educ Psychol 91(3):415–438, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.91.3.415), respectively. Based on these two classic theories of orthographic development, we conducted a multiple-path analysis to test the mediating role of orthographic knowledge in the relation of phonological awareness and rapid naming with efficient word reading. The sample consisted of 231 monolingual Greek-speaking children; 121 (58 males) Grade 2 children (M age = 7.82 years, SD = 3.32) and 110 (51 males) Grade 5 children (M age = 10.84, years, SD = 3.54) participated in the study. After establishing the significant contribution of orthographic knowledge to efficient word reading, we found two direct pathways: one from phonological awareness in Grade 5 and one from rapid naming in Grades 2 and 5 and two indirect pathways in which phonological awareness and rapid naming contribute to efficient word reading via orthographic knowledge in both Grades. Then, we assessed whether there is a shift over one of the two theories over time, using a multi-group analysis with data from Grades 2 and 5. Indeed, we found differences between two Grades in pathways from sub-lexical orthographic knowledge to efficient word reading, from phonological awareness and rapid naming to efficient word reading, and from rapid naming to sub-lexical orthographic knowledge. Our findings revealed that both pathways, representing the main self-teaching and rapid naming hypotheses, are active and work in both Grades, reflecting the parallel support of the two classic theories of orthographic knowledge development.

摘要 本研究旨在探讨语音意识和快速命名与高效单词阅读之间的关系。我们的研究建立在语音意识、快速命名、正字法知识和高效单词阅读之间关联的强大证据基础之上。具体来说,我们测试了语音意识与正字法知识和高效单词阅读之间的联系途径,以及快速命名与正字法知识和高效单词阅读之间的联系途径,这两个途径分别沿袭了自学假说(Share in Cognition 55(2):151-218, 1995. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(94)00645-2)和快速命名假说(Wolf & Bowers in J Educ Psychol 91(3):415-438, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.91.3.415)。基于这两种经典的正字法发展理论,我们进行了多重路径分析,以检验正字法知识在语音意识和快速命名与高效单词阅读之间的中介作用。样本由 231 名单语希腊语儿童组成,其中 121 名(58 名男性)二年级儿童(平均年龄为 7.82 岁,标准差为 3.32)和 110 名(51 名男性)五年级儿童(平均年龄为 10.84 岁,标准差为 3.54)参与了研究。在确定了正字法知识对高效单词阅读的重要贡献后,我们发现了两条直接途径:一条来自五年级的语音意识,一条来自二年级和五年级的快速命名;还有两条间接途径,即语音意识和快速命名通过正字法知识对两个年级的高效单词阅读做出了贡献。然后,我们利用二年级和五年级的数据进行了多组分析,评估了随着时间的推移,这两种理论中的一种是否会发生转变。事实上,我们发现两个年级在从副词汇正字法知识到高效单词阅读、从语音意识和快速命名到高效单词阅读以及从快速命名到副词汇正字法知识的途径上存在差异。我们的研究结果表明,代表主要自学假设和快速命名假设的两种途径在两个年级都很活跃,都能发挥作用,这反映了正字法知识发展的两种经典理论的平行支持。
{"title":"How orthographic knowledge is related to efficient word reading? Testing competing hypotheses","authors":"","doi":"10.1007/s11145-024-10525-8","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-024-10525-8","url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Abstract</h3> <p>This study aims to explore the relations of phonological awareness and rapid naming with efficient word reading. Our work builds on the strong evidence base of associations between phonological awareness, rapid naming, orthographic knowledge, and efficient word reading. Specifically, we tested a pathway linking phonological awareness to orthographic knowledge and on to efficient word reading and a pathway linking rapid naming to orthographic knowledge and on to efficient word reading,, following on the self-teaching (Share in Cognition 55(2):151–218, 1995. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(94)00645-2) and rapid naming hypotheses (Wolf &amp; Bowers in J Educ Psychol 91(3):415–438, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.91.3.415), respectively. Based on these two classic theories of orthographic development, we conducted a multiple-path analysis to test the mediating role of orthographic knowledge in the relation of phonological awareness and rapid naming with efficient word reading. The sample consisted of 231 monolingual Greek-speaking children; 121 (58 males) Grade 2 children (<em>M</em> age = 7.82 years, SD = 3.32) and 110 (51 males) Grade 5 children (<em>M</em> age = 10.84, years, SD = 3.54) participated in the study. After establishing the significant contribution of orthographic knowledge to efficient word reading, we found two direct pathways: one from phonological awareness in Grade 5 and one from rapid naming in Grades 2 and 5 and two indirect pathways in which phonological awareness and rapid naming contribute to efficient word reading via orthographic knowledge in both Grades. Then, we assessed whether there is a shift over one of the two theories over time, using a multi-group analysis with data from Grades 2 and 5. Indeed, we found differences between two Grades in pathways from sub-lexical orthographic knowledge to efficient word reading, from phonological awareness and rapid naming to efficient word reading, and from rapid naming to sub-lexical orthographic knowledge. Our findings revealed that both pathways, representing the main self-teaching and rapid naming hypotheses, are active and work in both Grades, reflecting the parallel support of the two classic theories of orthographic knowledge development.</p>","PeriodicalId":48204,"journal":{"name":"Reading and Writing","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140205522","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
An RCT of PD and expert support for classwide SRSD instruction on timed narrative writing at 4th grade: critical implications 对四年级全班学生记叙文定时写作教学进行指导和专家支持的 RCT:重要意义
IF 2.5 2区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2024-03-02 DOI: 10.1007/s11145-023-10507-2
Sharlene A. Kiuhara, Karen R. Harris, Steve Graham, Douglas J. Hacker, Mary E. Story, Debra McKeown

Composing narrative text is complex, requiring development of knowledge of genre specific and general writing knowledge, and the ability to sequence and convey real or imagined experiences, reactions, and an effective ending. Teachers, however, typically do not receive adequate professional learning needed for effective instruction in narrative writing. We collaborated with district-level stakeholders to address the specific writing needs of their 4th grade students and developed two narrative writing strategies aligned with state curriculum and expectations. We also developed two days of practice-based professional development (PBPD) for teachers who implemented Self-Regulated Strategy Development (SRSD) instruction. The PBPD included the genre-based and general writing knowledge needed to use these new strategies. SRSD instruction also included learning to write in a timed condition, as required in the state writing test. Expert support was provided during SRSD instruction. Instruction took place during the teachers’ English language arts block a minimum of 3 times per week. This randomized controlled trial involved 16 teachers and their 4th grade classrooms randomly assigned to the SRSD instruction or control conditions. PBPD resulted in high instructional fidelity for 14 features of SRSD instruction and high social validity for SRSD instruction. Hierarchical linear modeling indicated that student outcomes were moderate to large for narrative elements (g = 0.51) and story quality (g = 0.48), and small for total words written (g = 0.35). This study adds to research on PBPD for SRSD and challenges experienced, and to effective instruction in narrative writing. We discuss issues and future research that can make a difference to teachers, students, and schools.

记叙文的写作是复杂的,需要发展特定体裁的知识和一般写作知识,并有能力对真实或想象的经历、反应和有效的结尾进行排序和表达。然而,教师通常无法获得有效指导记叙文写作所需的充足的专业学习。我们与地区一级的利益相关者合作,以满足四年级学生的具体写作需求,并开发了两种与州课程和期望相一致的叙事写作策略。我们还为实施自我调节策略发展(SRSD)教学的教师开发了为期两天的基于实践的专业发展(PBPD)。PBPD 包括使用这些新策略所需的体裁和一般写作知识。SRSD 教学还包括在州写作测试要求的计时条件下学习写作。在 SRSD 教学过程中,还提供了专家支持。教学在教师的英语语言艺术课程中进行,每周至少 3 次。这项随机对照试验涉及 16 名教师及其四年级教室,他们被随机分配到 SRSD 教学或对照条件下。PBPD 对 14 个 SRSD 教学特点的教学忠实度很高,对 SRSD 教学的社会效度也很高。分层线性建模表明,在叙事元素(g = 0.51)和故事质量(g = 0.48)方面,学生的成果为中等至较大,而在总字数(g = 0.35)方面,学生的成果较小。本研究为针对 SRSD 的 PBPD 研究和所经历的挑战以及叙事写作的有效指导增添了新的内容。我们讨论了能够为教师、学生和学校带来改变的问题和未来研究。
{"title":"An RCT of PD and expert support for classwide SRSD instruction on timed narrative writing at 4th grade: critical implications","authors":"Sharlene A. Kiuhara, Karen R. Harris, Steve Graham, Douglas J. Hacker, Mary E. Story, Debra McKeown","doi":"10.1007/s11145-023-10507-2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-023-10507-2","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Composing narrative text is complex, requiring development of knowledge of genre specific and general writing knowledge, and the ability to sequence and convey real or imagined experiences, reactions, and an effective ending. Teachers, however, typically do not receive adequate professional learning needed for effective instruction in narrative writing. We collaborated with district-level stakeholders to address the specific writing needs of their 4th grade students and developed two narrative writing strategies aligned with state curriculum and expectations. We also developed two days of practice-based professional development (PBPD) for teachers who implemented Self-Regulated Strategy Development (SRSD) instruction. The PBPD included the genre-based and general writing knowledge needed to use these new strategies. SRSD instruction also included learning to write in a timed condition, as required in the state writing test. Expert support was provided during SRSD instruction. Instruction took place during the teachers’ English language arts block a minimum of 3 times per week. This randomized controlled trial involved 16 teachers and their 4th grade classrooms randomly assigned to the SRSD instruction or control conditions. PBPD resulted in high instructional fidelity for 14 features of SRSD instruction and high social validity for SRSD instruction. Hierarchical linear modeling indicated that student outcomes were moderate to large for narrative elements (<i>g</i> = 0.51) and story quality (<i>g</i> = 0.48), and small for total words written (<i>g</i> = 0.35). This study adds to research on PBPD for SRSD and challenges experienced, and to effective instruction in narrative writing. We discuss issues and future research that can make a difference to teachers, students, and schools.</p>","PeriodicalId":48204,"journal":{"name":"Reading and Writing","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140018309","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Gaining a deeper understanding of the deep cloze reading comprehension test: examining potential contributors and consequences 深入了解深度阅卷阅读理解测试:研究潜在的促成因素和后果
IF 2.5 2区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2024-02-28 DOI: 10.1007/s11145-024-10521-y
Ivar Bråten, Ymkje E. Haverkamp, Øistein Anmarkrud

The deep cloze test was developed by Jensen and Elbro (Read Writ Interdiscip J 35(5):1221–1237, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-021-10230-w) to assess reading comprehension at the level of global situational understanding. In two independent studies, we examined potential contributors to students’ scores on the deep cloze reading comprehension test, as well as the predictability of students’ scores on this measure for their course achievement and integrated text understanding measured with an open-ended written comprehension assessment. Results showed that students’ language background, word recognition skills, and working memory resources explained unique portions of the variance in students’ scores on the deep cloze reading comprehension test. Further, scores on this test were positively correlated with students’ course achievement and uniquely predicted their integrated text understanding when language background, working memory, and prior topic knowledge were controlled for. Taken together, our findings support an interpretation of the deep cloze reading comprehension test as an effective and efficient measure of situation level understanding that draws on language skills, word level processes, and working memory resources and also can be used to predict students’ performance on important criterial tasks requiring deeper level understanding.

深度回文测试是由 Jensen 和 Elbro(Read Writ Interdiscip J 35(5):1221-1237,2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-021-10230-w)开发的,用于评估全局情景理解层面的阅读理解能力。在两项独立的研究中,我们考察了影响学生在深度掐头去尾阅读理解测试中得分的潜在因素,以及学生在这一测试中的得分对其课程成绩和开放式书面理解评估所测得的综合文本理解的可预测性。结果表明,学生的语言背景、单词识别能力和工作记忆资源解释了学生在深阅读理解测试中得分差异的独特部分。此外,该测试的分数与学生的课程成绩呈正相关,并且在控制了语言背景、工作记忆和先前的主题知识后,还能独特地预测学生对文本的综合理解。综上所述,我们的研究结果支持将深度回文阅读理解测试解释为一种有效的情境理解测量方法,它利用了语言技能、单词水平过程和工作记忆资源,还可用于预测学生在需要更深层次理解的重要标准任务中的表现。
{"title":"Gaining a deeper understanding of the deep cloze reading comprehension test: examining potential contributors and consequences","authors":"Ivar Bråten, Ymkje E. Haverkamp, Øistein Anmarkrud","doi":"10.1007/s11145-024-10521-y","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-024-10521-y","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The deep cloze test was developed by Jensen and Elbro (Read Writ Interdiscip J 35(5):1221–1237, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-021-10230-w) to assess reading comprehension at the level of global situational understanding. In two independent studies, we examined potential contributors to students’ scores on the deep cloze reading comprehension test, as well as the predictability of students’ scores on this measure for their course achievement and integrated text understanding measured with an open-ended written comprehension assessment. Results showed that students’ language background, word recognition skills, and working memory resources explained unique portions of the variance in students’ scores on the deep cloze reading comprehension test. Further, scores on this test were positively correlated with students’ course achievement and uniquely predicted their integrated text understanding when language background, working memory, and prior topic knowledge were controlled for. Taken together, our findings support an interpretation of the deep cloze reading comprehension test as an effective and efficient measure of situation level understanding that draws on language skills, word level processes, and working memory resources and also can be used to predict students’ performance on important criterial tasks requiring deeper level understanding.</p>","PeriodicalId":48204,"journal":{"name":"Reading and Writing","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140003893","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Identifying kindergarteners at-risk of writing difficulties based on foundational literacy skills 根据基础读写能力识别有写作困难风险的幼儿园学生
IF 2.5 2区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2024-02-27 DOI: 10.1007/s11145-024-10518-7

Abstract

The main aim of this study was to evaluate the Early Grade Writing Assessment for Kindergarten (EGWA-K), which is grounded in foundational literacy skills, for its validity and diagnostic accuracy in identifying children at risk of developing early learning disabilities in writing (LDW). To the best of our knowledge, no such tool exists for Spanish-speaking children. A sample of 363 Spanish kindergarten children aged 4.7 to 6.6 years was selected for this purpose. The EGWA-K protocol, comprising four tasks (i.e., phonological awareness, writing words from pictures, free writing of words, and oral narrative), was administered to the sample. Additionally, two criterion tasks based on free letter writing and teacher ratings were included for validation purposes. First, an exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was conducted using parallel analysis to determine the dimensionality of the EGWA-K, which was confirmed by a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) yielding two factors (one related to transcription ability and the other to narrative competence). Additionally, measurement invariance was confirmed at the configural, metric, scalar, and residual levels by gender. The EGWA-K had an acceptable area under the ROC curve (AUC in the 0.87 range), particularly when free letter writing was utilized as the criterion measure, with adequate sensitivity (0.90) and specificity (0.71) indices. Therefore, a reliable and construct-valid screening tool such as the EGWA-K is now available for the early identification of LDW in Spanish kindergarten children.

摘要 本研究的主要目的是评估以基础读写技能为基础的幼儿园低年级写作评估(EGWA-K)在识别有早期写作学习障碍(LDW)风险的儿童方面的有效性和诊断准确性。据我们所知,目前还没有针对西班牙语儿童的此类工具。为此,我们选取了 363 名年龄在 4.7-6.6 岁之间的西班牙幼儿园儿童作为样本。我们对样本进行了 EGWA-K 测试,包括四项任务(即语音认知、看图写话、自由写话和口头叙述)。此外,还包括两项基于自由书写字母和教师评分的标准任务,以进行验证。首先,采用平行分析法进行了探索性因子分析(EFA),以确定 EGWA-K 的维度,并通过确证性因子分析(CFA)得出了两个因子(一个与抄写能力有关,另一个与叙述能力有关)。此外,测量不变性在构型、度量、标度和残差水平上按性别得到了证实。EGWA-K 具有可接受的 ROC 曲线下面积(AUC 在 0.87 的范围内),特别是在使用自由书写作为标准测量时,具有足够的灵敏度(0.90)和特异性(0.71)指数。因此,像EGWA-K这样可靠且经过结构验证的筛查工具现在已经可以用于早期识别西班牙幼儿园儿童的LDW。
{"title":"Identifying kindergarteners at-risk of writing difficulties based on foundational literacy skills","authors":"","doi":"10.1007/s11145-024-10518-7","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-024-10518-7","url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Abstract</h3> <p>The main aim of this study was to evaluate the Early Grade Writing Assessment for Kindergarten (EGWA-K), which is grounded in foundational literacy skills, for its validity and diagnostic accuracy in identifying children at risk of developing early learning disabilities in writing (LDW). To the best of our knowledge, no such tool exists for Spanish-speaking children. A sample of 363 Spanish kindergarten children aged 4.7 to 6.6 years was selected for this purpose. The EGWA-K protocol, comprising four tasks (i.e., phonological awareness, writing words from pictures, free writing of words, and oral narrative), was administered to the sample. Additionally, two criterion tasks based on free letter writing and teacher ratings were included for validation purposes. First, an exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was conducted using parallel analysis to determine the dimensionality of the EGWA-K, which was confirmed by a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) yielding two factors (one related to transcription ability and the other to narrative competence). Additionally, measurement invariance was confirmed at the configural, metric, scalar, and residual levels by gender. The EGWA-K had an acceptable area under the ROC curve (AUC in the 0.87 range), particularly when free letter writing was utilized as the criterion measure, with adequate sensitivity (0.90) and specificity (0.71) indices. Therefore, a reliable and construct-valid screening tool such as the EGWA-K is now available for the early identification of LDW in Spanish kindergarten children.</p>","PeriodicalId":48204,"journal":{"name":"Reading and Writing","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139978024","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Punctuation: a missing link between awareness of prosody and reading comprehension 标点符号:拟声意识与阅读理解之间缺失的一环
IF 2.5 2区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2024-02-22 DOI: 10.1007/s11145-024-10517-8
Alexandra M. Ryken, Lesly Wade-Woolley, S. Hélène Deacon

There is growing theoretical and empirical consensus for a role of awareness of suprasegmental phonology, also known as prosody, or the rhythmic elements of speech, in reading comprehension. Here we explore a potential mechanism by which this relation functions: awareness of how punctuation reflects prosody, for instance appreciating that a period or comma often marks a pause. Children who are more aware of prosody might be better able to use punctuation as a guide to what text should sound like, which could enable understanding text meaning. We tested 151 English-speaking students in Grades 3–5 to explore whether the relation between awareness of prosody and reading comprehension is mediated by awareness of how punctuation reflects prosody. After controlling for age, punctuation knowledge, word reading, phonological awareness, vocabulary, and nonverbal ability, there were direct relations between awareness of prosody and reading comprehension, as well as indirect effects via awareness of how punctuation reflects prosody. These results suggest a role for punctuation in applying awareness of prosody to reading comprehension; we interpret this as a potential mechanism by which awareness of prosody supports reading comprehension, a finding that can both refine current models of reading comprehension and inspire the design of effective instruction.

越来越多的理论界和实证界人士一致认为,语段上的语音意识,也就是所谓的 "前奏"(prosody)或语音的节奏元素,在阅读理解中发挥着重要作用。在此,我们探讨了这种关系发挥作用的潜在机制:对标点符号如何反映拟声词的认识,例如,认识到句号或逗号往往标志着停顿。对拟声词有较强意识的儿童可能更有能力使用标点符号作为引导,让他们知道文本应该听起来像什么,从而理解文本的含义。我们对 151 名 3-5 年级的英语学生进行了测试,以探讨对准音的认识与阅读理解之间的关系是否受标点符号如何反映准音的认识的影响。在控制了年龄、标点符号知识、单词阅读、语音意识、词汇量和非语言能力之后,学生的拟声词意识与阅读理解之间存在直接关系,同时也存在通过标点符号如何反映拟声词的意识产生的间接影响。这些结果表明,标点符号在将对拟声词的认识应用于阅读理解方面发挥了作用;我们将此解释为对拟声词的认识支持阅读理解的潜在机制,这一发现既能完善当前的阅读理解模型,又能启发有效教学的设计。
{"title":"Punctuation: a missing link between awareness of prosody and reading comprehension","authors":"Alexandra M. Ryken, Lesly Wade-Woolley, S. Hélène Deacon","doi":"10.1007/s11145-024-10517-8","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-024-10517-8","url":null,"abstract":"<p>There is growing theoretical and empirical consensus for a role of awareness of suprasegmental phonology, also known as prosody, or the rhythmic elements of speech, in reading comprehension. Here we explore a potential mechanism by which this relation functions: awareness of how punctuation reflects prosody, for instance appreciating that a period or comma often marks a pause. Children who are more aware of prosody might be better able to use punctuation as a guide to what text should sound like, which could enable understanding text meaning. We tested 151 English-speaking students in Grades 3–5 to explore whether the relation between awareness of prosody and reading comprehension is mediated by awareness of how punctuation reflects prosody. After controlling for age, punctuation knowledge, word reading, phonological awareness, vocabulary, and nonverbal ability, there were direct relations between awareness of prosody and reading comprehension, as well as indirect effects via awareness of how punctuation reflects prosody. These results suggest a role for punctuation in applying awareness of prosody to reading comprehension; we interpret this as a potential mechanism by which awareness of prosody supports reading comprehension, a finding that can both refine current models of reading comprehension and inspire the design of effective instruction.</p>","PeriodicalId":48204,"journal":{"name":"Reading and Writing","volume":"253 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139949941","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The implementation of writing pedagogies in the Write to Read intervention in low-SES primary schools in Ireland 在爱尔兰社会经济地位较低的小学实施 "写给阅读 "干预措施中的写作教学法
IF 2.5 2区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2024-02-10 DOI: 10.1007/s11145-023-10510-7
Eithne Kennedy, Gerry Shiel

This study describes the initial implementation of the writing component of the Write to Read (W2R) literacy intervention in eight low-SES (socio-economically disadvantaged) elementary-level urban schools. Through customised onsite professional development provided by coaches, the writing component sought to build teachers’ capacity to design and implement a writing workshop framework infused with research-informed practices for writing suitable for their school and classroom contexts, including attention to cognitive, social and affective dimensions. The paper draws on quantitative and qualitative questionnaire data gathered from classroom teachers in the eight schools in Year 1 (n = 66) and Year 3 (n = 62) of implementation, and semi-structured interviews with randomly selected teachers in each school in Year 4 (n = 18). In general, teachers succeeded in implementing a writing workshop approach to teaching writing, within the broader W2R literacy framework, including the allocation of more time to writing instruction. Professional development, including observation, feedback and demonstration by W2R literacy coaches, contributed to high levels of teacher confidence in such areas as planning and teaching fiction and non-fiction writing genres, and analysing writing samples to inform mini-lessons. By Year 3, teachers noted marked or good improvements in students’ attitudes towards writing, volume of writing produced, knowledge of writing genres, and language of response to writing. Areas in need of further support included aspects of the craft of writing, including writing vocabulary, supporting pupils to set goals for writing, selecting mentor texts to teach writing genres, and using a rubric to assess writing development.

本研究介绍了在八所社会经济地位较低(low-SES)的城市小学中初步实施的 "从写到读"(W2R)扫盲干预的写作部分。通过教练提供的定制现场专业发展,写作部分旨在培养教师设计和实施写作工作坊框架的能力,该框架融入了适合其学校和课堂环境的研究型写作实践,包括关注认知、社会和情感层面。本文参考了在第一年(66 人)和第三年(62 人)从八所学校的任课教师那里收集到的定量和定性问卷数据,以及在第四年(18 人)对每所学校随机抽取的教师进行的半结构化访谈。总体而言,教师们在更广泛的 "W2R "扫盲框架内成功实施了写作工作坊教学法,包括为写作教学分配更多时间。专业发展,包括 W2R 扫盲辅导员的观察、反馈和示范,使教师在小说和非小说写作体裁的规划和教学,以及分析写作样本以指导微型课程等方面信心十足。到了三年级,教师注意到学生在写作态度、写作量、写作体裁知识和写作回应语言等方面都有明显或良好的进步。需要进一步支持的领域包括写作技巧的各个方面,包括写作词汇、支持学生设定写作目标、选择指导课文来教授写作体裁,以及使用评分标准来评估写作发展。
{"title":"The implementation of writing pedagogies in the Write to Read intervention in low-SES primary schools in Ireland","authors":"Eithne Kennedy, Gerry Shiel","doi":"10.1007/s11145-023-10510-7","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-023-10510-7","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study describes the initial implementation of the writing component of the <i>Write to Read</i> (<i>W2R</i>) literacy intervention in eight low-SES (socio-economically disadvantaged) elementary-level urban schools. Through customised onsite professional development provided by coaches, the writing component sought to build teachers’ capacity to design and implement a writing workshop framework infused with research-informed practices for writing suitable for their school and classroom contexts, including attention to cognitive, social and affective dimensions. The paper draws on quantitative and qualitative questionnaire data gathered from classroom teachers in the eight schools in Year 1 (n = 66) and Year 3 (n = 62) of implementation, and semi-structured interviews with randomly selected teachers in each school in Year 4 (n = 18). In general, teachers succeeded in implementing a writing workshop approach to teaching writing, within the broader <i>W2R</i> literacy framework, including the allocation of more time to writing instruction. Professional development, including observation, feedback and demonstration by <i>W2R</i> literacy coaches, contributed to high levels of teacher confidence in such areas as planning and teaching fiction and non-fiction writing genres, and analysing writing samples to inform mini-lessons. By Year 3, teachers noted marked or good improvements in students’ attitudes towards writing, volume of writing produced, knowledge of writing genres, and language of response to writing. Areas in need of further support included aspects of the craft of writing, including writing vocabulary, supporting pupils to set goals for writing, selecting mentor texts to teach writing genres, and using a rubric to assess writing development.</p>","PeriodicalId":48204,"journal":{"name":"Reading and Writing","volume":"313 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139767142","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Instruction influences cross-language transfer of reading skills: evidence from a longitudinal randomized controlled trial 教学对阅读技能跨语言迁移的影响:来自纵向随机对照试验的证据
IF 2.5 2区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2024-02-01 DOI: 10.1007/s11145-023-10508-1

Abstract

Longitudinal data from the Early Grade Reading Study (EGRS I) in South Africa (N = 4538) were used to examine the role of instructional contexts in the relations of literacy skills between children’s home language (L1 Setswana) and a second language (L2 English). All children received literacy instruction in Setswana in Grades 1 to 3. However, children in the treatment condition were provided with explicit and systematic Setswana language instruction in phonological awareness and phonics (n = 1964), whereas those in comparison condition received business-as-usual instruction (n = 2574). Children’s literacy skills were assessed four times: Time 1 in the beginning of Grade 1, Time 2 at the end of Grade 1, Time 3 at the end of Grade 2, and Time 4 at the end of Grade 4. Literacy data in Setswana were collected in all four time points, whereas data in English were collected in Times 3 and 4. Results from confirmatory factor analysis and structural equation modeling showed that L1 Setswana literacy skill strongly predicted concurrent L2 English reading skill across instructional contexts. However, the longitudinal relation from Grade 2 Setswana literacy skill to Grade 4 English reading skill was found only for those in the treatment condition, but not for those in the comparison condition, after accounting for concurrent relations between Setswana and English. These results suggest that instructional contexts in L1 have implications for the nature relations between L1 and L2 literacy skills.

摘要 南非低年级阅读研究(EGRS I)的纵向数据(N = 4538)被用来研究教学环境在儿童母语(第一语言塞茨瓦纳语)和第二语言(第二语言英语)之间的识字技能关系中的作用。所有儿童在一至三年级都接受了塞茨瓦纳语的识字教学。但是,治疗条件下的儿童接受了明确、系统的塞茨瓦纳语语音意识和语音教学(n = 1964),而对比条件下的儿童则接受了常规教学(n = 2574)。对儿童的读写能力进行了四次评估:第 1 次在一年级开始时,第 2 次在一年级结束时,第 3 次在二年级结束时,第 4 次在四年级结束时。在所有四个时间点都收集了塞茨瓦纳语的识字数据,而在第 3 和第 4 个时间点收集了英语数据。确证因子分析和结构方程模型的结果表明,在不同的教学情境中,第一语言塞茨瓦纳语的读写能力对第二语言英语阅读能力有很强的预测作用。然而,在考虑了塞茨瓦纳语和英语之间的并发关系后,从二年级塞茨瓦纳语读写能力到四年级英语阅读能力的纵向关系只在治疗条件下的学生身上发现,而在对比条件下的学生身上没有发现。这些结果表明,L1 的教学环境对 L1 和 L2 读写能力之间的性质关系有影响。
{"title":"Instruction influences cross-language transfer of reading skills: evidence from a longitudinal randomized controlled trial","authors":"","doi":"10.1007/s11145-023-10508-1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-023-10508-1","url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Abstract</h3> <p>Longitudinal data from the Early Grade Reading Study (EGRS I) in South Africa (<em>N</em> = 4538) were used to examine the role of instructional contexts in the relations of literacy skills between children’s home language (L1 Setswana) and a second language (L2 English). All children received literacy instruction in Setswana in Grades 1 to 3. However, children in the treatment condition were provided with explicit and systematic Setswana language instruction in phonological awareness and phonics (<em>n</em> = 1964), whereas those in comparison condition received business-as-usual instruction (<em>n</em> = 2574). Children’s literacy skills were assessed four times: Time 1 in the beginning of Grade 1, Time 2 at the end of Grade 1, Time 3 at the end of Grade 2, and Time 4 at the end of Grade 4. Literacy data in Setswana were collected in all four time points, whereas data in English were collected in Times 3 and 4. Results from confirmatory factor analysis and structural equation modeling showed that L1 Setswana literacy skill strongly predicted concurrent L2 English reading skill across instructional contexts. However, the longitudinal relation from Grade 2 Setswana literacy skill to Grade 4 English reading skill was found only for those in the treatment condition, but not for those in the comparison condition, after accounting for concurrent relations between Setswana and English. These results suggest that instructional contexts in L1 have implications for the nature relations between L1 and L2 literacy skills.</p>","PeriodicalId":48204,"journal":{"name":"Reading and Writing","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139680252","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Bridging to academic success: the impact of reading gains in an English bridging program on GPAs 衔接学业成功:英语衔接课程中阅读能力的提高对 GPA 的影响
IF 2.5 2区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2024-02-01 DOI: 10.1007/s11145-024-10514-x
Daniel Schmidtke, Seina Yamada, Anna L. Moro

Although research has established that students enrolled in pre-sessional English for academic purposes (EAP) programs make gains in English reading ability, the evidence base for whether gains made during this period of instruction make a difference to future academic outcomes is nonexistent. We report a multi-cohort longitudinal study of a 28-week university-level EAP program that was designed to improve the English language skills of international students in preparation for undergraduate study. The sample comprised N = 405 EAL students who completed the same EAP program in a Canadian university. At the beginning and end of the EAP program students completed a battery of 12 measures, including reading comprehension, reading fluency, and other established component skills of second language reading ability. We investigated whether the change scores of these measures, as markers of skill growth, predicted the post-EAP program undergraduate grade point averages (GPAs) of these same students. The Random Forests nonparametric regression technique was used to estimate the relative importance of all change scores of the reading skill tests, as well as their scores at the beginning of the program. This method identified reading fluency change during the EAP program as a high-ranking predictor of future GPAs. Additional stepwise linear regression modelling confirmed that reading fluency change made unique significant contributions to GPAs in such a way that greater growth in this measure translated into higher GPAs. These findings suggest that reading speed development during an EAP program has a long-term and beneficial impact on the academic flourishing of EALs.

尽管已有研究证实,参加会前学术英语课程(EAP)的学生在英语阅读能力方面有所提高,但在这一教学阶段所取得的成绩是否会对未来的学业成绩产生影响,目前还没有相关的证据。我们报告了一项多队列纵向研究,研究对象是一个为期 28 周的大学英语课程,该课程旨在提高留学生的英语语言技能,为本科学习做好准备。样本包括 N = 405 名在加拿大一所大学完成相同 EAP 课程的 EAL 学生。在 EAP 课程开始和结束时,学生们完成了一系列 12 项测量,包括阅读理解、阅读流畅性和第二语言阅读能力的其他既定组成技能。我们研究了作为技能增长标志的这些测量的变化分数是否能预测这些学生在 EAP 项目结束后的本科平均学分绩点 (GPA)。我们使用随机森林非参数回归技术来估算阅读技能测试的所有变化分数及其在项目开始时的分数的相对重要性。这种方法将 EAP 项目期间的阅读流畅性变化确定为未来 GPA 的重要预测指标。额外的逐步线性回归模型证实,阅读流畅度的变化对 GPA 有独特的显著贡献,即这一指标的增长越大,GPA 越高。这些研究结果表明,EAP 课程中的阅读速度发展对 EALs 的学业发展有着长期而有益的影响。
{"title":"Bridging to academic success: the impact of reading gains in an English bridging program on GPAs","authors":"Daniel Schmidtke, Seina Yamada, Anna L. Moro","doi":"10.1007/s11145-024-10514-x","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-024-10514-x","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Although research has established that students enrolled in pre-sessional English for academic purposes (EAP) programs make gains in English reading ability, the evidence base for whether gains made during this period of instruction make a difference to future academic outcomes is nonexistent. We report a multi-cohort longitudinal study of a 28-week university-level EAP program that was designed to improve the English language skills of international students in preparation for undergraduate study. The sample comprised <i>N</i> = 405 EAL students who completed the same EAP program in a Canadian university. At the beginning and end of the EAP program students completed a battery of 12 measures, including reading comprehension, reading fluency, and other established component skills of second language reading ability. We investigated whether the change scores of these measures, as markers of skill growth, predicted the post-EAP program undergraduate grade point averages (GPAs) of these same students. The Random Forests nonparametric regression technique was used to estimate the relative importance of all change scores of the reading skill tests, as well as their scores at the beginning of the program. This method identified reading fluency change during the EAP program as a high-ranking predictor of future GPAs. Additional stepwise linear regression modelling confirmed that reading fluency change made unique significant contributions to GPAs in such a way that greater growth in this measure translated into higher GPAs. These findings suggest that reading speed development during an EAP program has a long-term and beneficial impact on the academic flourishing of EALs.</p>","PeriodicalId":48204,"journal":{"name":"Reading and Writing","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139680180","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Reading and Writing
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1