Pub Date : 2025-12-29DOI: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2025.104701
Wang Yedi , Zhu Jiaji , Yan Qing
Although the application of virtual reality (VR) in tourism has shown exponential growth, existing research primarily explores the benefits of VR technology in tourism from immersion, interactivity, and social presence. Designing virtual tourism products from the perspective of perceived legitimacy is an important but underexplored topic in current research. Based on the DAST framework and the theory of legitimacy, this study, taking the VR museum as an example, investigates the impact of the behavior of other visitors on the focal visitor's intention to revisit and the underlying mechanisms. The findings from a pilot experiment and two between-subjects experiments indicate that the behavior of “viewing exhibits” can enhance the focal visitor's revisit intention through perceived legitimacy compared to the behavior of “talking with each other”. Furthermore, day-night conditions not only play a moderating role in the relationship between the behavior of other visitors and the focal visitor's revisit intention, but also moderate the mediation of perceived legitimacy. This study offers practical insights for designing and optimizing VR museums, with significant application value in enhancing perceived legitimacy and revisit intention.
{"title":"Enhancing perceived legitimacy to increase VR museum revisits: Based on the DAST framework","authors":"Wang Yedi , Zhu Jiaji , Yan Qing","doi":"10.1016/j.jretconser.2025.104701","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jretconser.2025.104701","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Although the application of virtual reality (VR) in tourism has shown exponential growth, existing research primarily explores the benefits of VR technology in tourism from immersion, interactivity, and social presence. Designing virtual tourism products from the perspective of perceived legitimacy is an important but underexplored topic in current research. Based on the DAST framework and the theory of legitimacy, this study, taking the VR museum as an example, investigates the impact of the behavior of other visitors on the focal visitor's intention to revisit and the underlying mechanisms. The findings from a pilot experiment and two between-subjects experiments indicate that the behavior of “viewing exhibits” can enhance the focal visitor's revisit intention through perceived legitimacy compared to the behavior of “talking with each other”. Furthermore, day-night conditions not only play a moderating role in the relationship between the behavior of other visitors and the focal visitor's revisit intention, but also moderate the mediation of perceived legitimacy. This study offers practical insights for designing and optimizing VR museums, with significant application value in enhancing perceived legitimacy and revisit intention.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48399,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services","volume":"90 ","pages":"Article 104701"},"PeriodicalIF":13.1,"publicationDate":"2025-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145883968","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-28DOI: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2025.104699
Chih-Jou Chen , Julian Ming-Sung Cheng
AI is reshaping in-store and omnichannel retail, yet adoption hinges on whether assistance feels helpful or “too close.” This study develops and tests a perceived-intrusiveness (PI)–centered MOA framework for AI-enabled smart retail. PI is theorized as the proximal appraisal that links motivation, opportunity, and ability cues to attitude and, in turn, adoption intention. Specifically, perceived usefulness and personalization quality (motivation), AI transparency and user control (opportunity), and algorithmic literacy and privacy self-efficacy (ability) are modeled as antecedents of PI. Using quota-based data from Taiwanese shoppers who recently used AI retail services (n = 861), we estimated PLS-SEM models with 5000-sample bootstrapping. Personalization quality and user control are the strongest intrusiveness-reducing antecedents; ability variables exert smaller but significant negative effects; usefulness and transparency are weaker. Trust in AI moderates the first-stage links: it strengthens the intrusiveness-reducing effects of personalization quality and user control, does not amplify usefulness, and transparency shows a compensatory pattern (helping chiefly when trust is low). All six antecedents exhibit significant indirect effects operating through PI to shape attitudes and, sequentially, intention. An exploratory check distinguishes personalization intensity from quality and finds a positive incremental link to PI net of quality. The findings clarify designable levers and boundary conditions in MOA and yield actionable guidance: prioritize quality over intensity, provide granular in-flow controls, and use purpose-linked transparency especially for low-trust segments.
{"title":"When help feels creepy: A MOA model of AI smart-retail adoption via perceived intrusiveness and the moderating role of trust in AI","authors":"Chih-Jou Chen , Julian Ming-Sung Cheng","doi":"10.1016/j.jretconser.2025.104699","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jretconser.2025.104699","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>AI is reshaping in-store and omnichannel retail, yet adoption hinges on whether assistance feels helpful or “too close.” This study develops and tests a perceived-intrusiveness (PI)–centered MOA framework for AI-enabled smart retail. PI is theorized as the proximal appraisal that links motivation, opportunity, and ability cues to attitude and, in turn, adoption intention. Specifically, perceived usefulness and personalization quality (motivation), AI transparency and user control (opportunity), and algorithmic literacy and privacy self-efficacy (ability) are modeled as antecedents of PI. Using quota-based data from Taiwanese shoppers who recently used AI retail services (n = 861), we estimated PLS-SEM models with 5000-sample bootstrapping. Personalization quality and user control are the strongest intrusiveness-reducing antecedents; ability variables exert smaller but significant negative effects; usefulness and transparency are weaker. Trust in AI moderates the first-stage links: it strengthens the intrusiveness-reducing effects of personalization quality and user control, does not amplify usefulness, and transparency shows a compensatory pattern (helping chiefly when trust is low). All six antecedents exhibit significant indirect effects operating through PI to shape attitudes and, sequentially, intention. An exploratory check distinguishes personalization intensity from quality and finds a positive incremental link to PI net of quality. The findings clarify designable levers and boundary conditions in MOA and yield actionable guidance: prioritize quality over intensity, provide granular in-flow controls, and use purpose-linked transparency especially for low-trust segments.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48399,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services","volume":"90 ","pages":"Article 104699"},"PeriodicalIF":13.1,"publicationDate":"2025-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145883970","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-28DOI: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2025.104704
Yijia Sun , Chundong Zheng , Ke Ma
The emergence of virtual influencers (VIs), driven by advances in digital technology, presents a compelling alternative to human influencers (HIs) in brand endorsements. Yet, a systematic understanding of how to develop VI's communication strategies regarding “what to say” and “how to say” across different endorsement contexts remains notably absent. Through a field study with secondary data and three scenario-based experiments, this research demonstrates the interaction effect between product and description type in shaping VIs' endorsement effectiveness. Specifically, the match between search (experience) products and subjective (objective) descriptions enhances consumers' attitudes towards the advertising, brand, endorser, and their purchase intention. More importantly, mental simulation explains these effects as a potential mechanism. The findings of this research are crucial for understanding how endorsed products and content promoted by influencers (especially VIs) shape consumer experiences and provide significant implications for marketing practice.
{"title":"Speaking of facts or experiences? The interaction effect between description types of virtual influencers and product types on endorsement effectiveness","authors":"Yijia Sun , Chundong Zheng , Ke Ma","doi":"10.1016/j.jretconser.2025.104704","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jretconser.2025.104704","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The emergence of virtual influencers (VIs), driven by advances in digital technology, presents a compelling alternative to human influencers (HIs) in brand endorsements. Yet, a systematic understanding of how to develop VI's communication strategies regarding “what to say” and “how to say” across different endorsement contexts remains notably absent. Through a field study with secondary data and three scenario-based experiments, this research demonstrates the interaction effect between product and description type in shaping VIs' endorsement effectiveness. Specifically, the match between search (experience) products and subjective (objective) descriptions enhances consumers' attitudes towards the advertising, brand, endorser, and their purchase intention. More importantly, mental simulation explains these effects as a potential mechanism. The findings of this research are crucial for understanding how endorsed products and content promoted by influencers (especially VIs) shape consumer experiences and provide significant implications for marketing practice.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48399,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services","volume":"90 ","pages":"Article 104704"},"PeriodicalIF":13.1,"publicationDate":"2025-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145883974","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-27DOI: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2025.104703
Hongyong Li , Yuxia Qiu , Jiantao Zhu
Quality issues in delivery services due to non-compliant behaviors by riders have infringed upon consumer rights and hindered the development of the instant delivery industry. This study develops a reputation-triggered evolutionary game between instant delivery platforms and riders, in which riders' reputation values determine the intensity of the platform's incentives and sanctions. Focusing on three governance elements commonly used in practice, commissions, penalties, and subsidies, we identify seven dynamic regulatory architectures based on whether the platform adopts a single element, a partial combination, or a full combination. The model is used to evaluate regulatory effectiveness and to determine the optimal architecture under different conditions. Findings reveal that relying solely on a subsidy-based regulatory architecture is unsustainable due to high costs, potentially leading platforms to adopt negative regulation. By reducing excess returns from non-compliant deliveries, cutting active regulatory costs, and adjusting riders' reputation values, the effectiveness of single-element and partially mixed architectures can be enhanced. A completely mixed regulatory architecture employing commissions, penalties, and subsidies concurrently is the most effective. However, fluctuations in platforms' active regulation and riders' compliance over time highlight the need for a continuous mixed regulatory approach. These findings provide decision-making insights for optimizing regulatory architectures against delivery violations from a reputation-based perspective.
{"title":"Optimal dynamic regulatory architectures for riders' non-compliant deliveries: A reputation-triggered game analysis","authors":"Hongyong Li , Yuxia Qiu , Jiantao Zhu","doi":"10.1016/j.jretconser.2025.104703","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jretconser.2025.104703","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Quality issues in delivery services due to non-compliant behaviors by riders have infringed upon consumer rights and hindered the development of the instant delivery industry. This study develops a reputation-triggered evolutionary game between instant delivery platforms and riders, in which riders' reputation values determine the intensity of the platform's incentives and sanctions. Focusing on three governance elements commonly used in practice, commissions, penalties, and subsidies, we identify seven dynamic regulatory architectures based on whether the platform adopts a single element, a partial combination, or a full combination. The model is used to evaluate regulatory effectiveness and to determine the optimal architecture under different conditions. Findings reveal that relying solely on a subsidy-based regulatory architecture is unsustainable due to high costs, potentially leading platforms to adopt negative regulation. By reducing excess returns from non-compliant deliveries, cutting active regulatory costs, and adjusting riders' reputation values, the effectiveness of single-element and partially mixed architectures can be enhanced. A completely mixed regulatory architecture employing commissions, penalties, and subsidies concurrently is the most effective. However, fluctuations in platforms' active regulation and riders' compliance over time highlight the need for a continuous mixed regulatory approach. These findings provide decision-making insights for optimizing regulatory architectures against delivery violations from a reputation-based perspective.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48399,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services","volume":"90 ","pages":"Article 104703"},"PeriodicalIF":13.1,"publicationDate":"2025-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145840759","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-27DOI: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2025.104698
Xingyuan Wang, Zhiying Xu
Food visual cues play a critical role in shaping consumer purchase decisions according to digital marketing research. However, limited attention has been paid to the comparative effects and underlying mechanisms of internal versus external visual perspectives. This study introduces a novel classification of food-related visual cues—internal detail views versus external overall views—and, drawing on signaling theory, investigates their effect on purchase intention, as well as the underlying mechanisms and boundary conditions. The findings of one eye-tracking study and four scenario-based experiments reveal that internal detail views (vs. external overall views) attract consumer attention more effectively and enhance perceived trust and purchase intention. Furthermore, the relationship between visual cues and purchase intention is mediated by perceived trust. The results indicate that the effect of visual cues on perceived trust is moderated by consumer thinking styles and perceived complexity. By proposing a new classification of visual cues for food products from internal and external perspectives, this research uncovers the underlying mechanisms and contextual boundaries through which visual cues influence consumer behavior. The findings enrich the literature on food visual marketing and consumer decision-making while providing practical implications for online food marketing strategies.
{"title":"Viewing inside or outside? The effect of internal detail views of food on consumer trust and purchase intention","authors":"Xingyuan Wang, Zhiying Xu","doi":"10.1016/j.jretconser.2025.104698","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jretconser.2025.104698","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Food visual cues play a critical role in shaping consumer purchase decisions according to digital marketing research. However, limited attention has been paid to the comparative effects and underlying mechanisms of internal versus external visual perspectives. This study introduces a novel classification of food-related visual cues—internal detail views versus external overall views—and, drawing on signaling theory, investigates their effect on purchase intention, as well as the underlying mechanisms and boundary conditions. The findings of one eye-tracking study and four scenario-based experiments reveal that internal detail views (vs. external overall views) attract consumer attention more effectively and enhance perceived trust and purchase intention. Furthermore, the relationship between visual cues and purchase intention is mediated by perceived trust. The results indicate that the effect of visual cues on perceived trust is moderated by consumer thinking styles and perceived complexity. By proposing a new classification of visual cues for food products from internal and external perspectives, this research uncovers the underlying mechanisms and contextual boundaries through which visual cues influence consumer behavior. The findings enrich the literature on food visual marketing and consumer decision-making while providing practical implications for online food marketing strategies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48399,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services","volume":"90 ","pages":"Article 104698"},"PeriodicalIF":13.1,"publicationDate":"2025-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145840761","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-27DOI: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2025.104708
Kwanho Suk
Consumers often evaluate tied goods—durable products paired with required complementary consumables—without fully integrating the total cost of ownership into their judgments. This research examines how consumers weigh durable versus complementary product costs and how this weighting differs depending on cost presentation and bundling format. Across three studies, consumers consistently placed greater emphasis on the durable product price and underweighted complementary costs, even when complementary cost increases resulted in equal or greater changes in total ownership cost. Study 1 shows that consumers are less responsive to changes in complement selling price than to comparable changes in the durable product price. Study 2 demonstrates that ongoing usage-based complement costs are further neglected, reflecting reduced attention to temporally extended expenses. Study 3 finds that bundling attenuates this asymmetry by reducing the salience of separate price components and prompting heuristic value judgments. Together, these findings advance understanding of consumer pricing evaluation in tied-goods systems and offer implications for the design of bundling and captive pricing strategies.
{"title":"Tied-goods pricing: Consumer decision-making and managerial implications","authors":"Kwanho Suk","doi":"10.1016/j.jretconser.2025.104708","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jretconser.2025.104708","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Consumers often evaluate tied goods—durable products paired with required complementary consumables—without fully integrating the total cost of ownership into their judgments. This research examines how consumers weigh durable versus complementary product costs and how this weighting differs depending on cost presentation and bundling format. Across three studies, consumers consistently placed greater emphasis on the durable product price and underweighted complementary costs, even when complementary cost increases resulted in equal or greater changes in total ownership cost. Study 1 shows that consumers are less responsive to changes in complement selling price than to comparable changes in the durable product price. Study 2 demonstrates that ongoing usage-based complement costs are further neglected, reflecting reduced attention to temporally extended expenses. Study 3 finds that bundling attenuates this asymmetry by reducing the salience of separate price components and prompting heuristic value judgments. Together, these findings advance understanding of consumer pricing evaluation in tied-goods systems and offer implications for the design of bundling and captive pricing strategies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48399,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services","volume":"90 ","pages":"Article 104708"},"PeriodicalIF":13.1,"publicationDate":"2025-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145883971","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-27DOI: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2025.104707
Rahul Meena , Samar Sarabhai
The exponential growth of hedonic mobile applications necessitates understanding of user stickiness mechanisms beyond traditional technology acceptance frameworks. Current research overlooks how individual differences, particularly gender and usage frequency, create distinct processing pathways in hedonic contexts. This study examines differential stickiness mechanisms using multi-group structural equation modeling across six user segments (gender × usage frequency combinations) with 2149 participants. Drawing on the Hedonic Motivation System Adoption Model, Aesthetic Experience Theory, and dual-route processing concepts, we develop an integrated framework examining hedonic app stickiness pathways. Results suggest systematic gender-associated patterns: females exhibit associations consistent with direct benefit-to-stickiness pathways, while males show patterns aligned with satisfaction-mediated processing. These differences appear more pronounced at higher usage levels, with heavy-usage males showing the strongest satisfaction-stickiness associations compared to non-significant satisfaction effects observed in low-usage females. Multi-group analysis shows patterns indicating significant pathway differences across user segments, with large effect sizes supporting distinct processing mechanisms. These findings advance hedonic technology stickiness theory by showing patterns consistent with processing pathways while providing practical guidance for personalized app design strategies.
{"title":"Gender differences in hedonic mobile app stickiness: A multi-group SEM analysis of processing pathways","authors":"Rahul Meena , Samar Sarabhai","doi":"10.1016/j.jretconser.2025.104707","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jretconser.2025.104707","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The exponential growth of hedonic mobile applications necessitates understanding of user stickiness mechanisms beyond traditional technology acceptance frameworks. Current research overlooks how individual differences, particularly gender and usage frequency, create distinct processing pathways in hedonic contexts. This study examines differential stickiness mechanisms using multi-group structural equation modeling across six user segments (gender × usage frequency combinations) with 2149 participants. Drawing on the Hedonic Motivation System Adoption Model, Aesthetic Experience Theory, and dual-route processing concepts, we develop an integrated framework examining hedonic app stickiness pathways. Results suggest systematic gender-associated patterns: females exhibit associations consistent with direct benefit-to-stickiness pathways, while males show patterns aligned with satisfaction-mediated processing. These differences appear more pronounced at higher usage levels, with heavy-usage males showing the strongest satisfaction-stickiness associations compared to non-significant satisfaction effects observed in low-usage females. Multi-group analysis shows patterns indicating significant pathway differences across user segments, with large effect sizes supporting distinct processing mechanisms. These findings advance hedonic technology stickiness theory by showing patterns consistent with processing pathways while providing practical guidance for personalized app design strategies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48399,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services","volume":"90 ","pages":"Article 104707"},"PeriodicalIF":13.1,"publicationDate":"2025-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145840760","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-26DOI: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2025.104706
Taeshik Gong , Yu-Shan (Sandy) Huang
AI-enabled service technologies are increasingly deployed in hospitality and other customer-facing industries, yet failures of these systems create not only customer dissatisfaction but also significant challenges for employees. This research develops and tests a dual-pathway framework to explain how employees interpret and respond to AI service failures. Drawing on cognitive appraisal theory and the challenge–hindrance framework, we propose that failures are simultaneously appraised as challenges, which foster problem-solving, and as hindrances, which foster cynicism. Across three complementary studies, we provide cumulative evidence for these mechanisms. Study 1 employed a laboratory experiment with hospitality employees (N = 120), who viewed video vignettes of a humanoid robot performing successfully or failing, after which they completed validated scales of challenge and hindrance appraisals. Study 2 used an online scenario experiment with hospitality employees (N = 200), where participants read service failure or success scenarios and responded to multi-item measures of appraisals, problem-solving, and cynicism. Study 3 surveyed frontline hotel employees (N = 262) in East Asia, collecting self-reported data on the frequency and severity of AI service failures and employees' appraisals and behaviors, along with validated measures of technology self-efficacy and job autonomy. Taken together, the findings demonstrate that AI service failures simultaneously stimulate constructive engagement and destructive withdrawal, depending on employees’ appraisals and resources. This study extends service failure research beyond its customer-centric tradition and highlights actionable levers for managing employee responses in AI-mediated service ecosystems.
{"title":"When robots fail: Dual pathways of employee appraisals in hospitality","authors":"Taeshik Gong , Yu-Shan (Sandy) Huang","doi":"10.1016/j.jretconser.2025.104706","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jretconser.2025.104706","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>AI-enabled service technologies are increasingly deployed in hospitality and other customer-facing industries, yet failures of these systems create not only customer dissatisfaction but also significant challenges for employees. This research develops and tests a dual-pathway framework to explain how employees interpret and respond to AI service failures. Drawing on cognitive appraisal theory and the challenge–hindrance framework, we propose that failures are simultaneously appraised as challenges, which foster problem-solving, and as hindrances, which foster cynicism. Across three complementary studies, we provide cumulative evidence for these mechanisms. Study 1 employed a laboratory experiment with hospitality employees (N = 120), who viewed video vignettes of a humanoid robot performing successfully or failing, after which they completed validated scales of challenge and hindrance appraisals. Study 2 used an online scenario experiment with hospitality employees (N = 200), where participants read service failure or success scenarios and responded to multi-item measures of appraisals, problem-solving, and cynicism. Study 3 surveyed frontline hotel employees (N = 262) in East Asia, collecting self-reported data on the frequency and severity of AI service failures and employees' appraisals and behaviors, along with validated measures of technology self-efficacy and job autonomy. Taken together, the findings demonstrate that AI service failures simultaneously stimulate constructive engagement and destructive withdrawal, depending on employees’ appraisals and resources. This study extends service failure research beyond its customer-centric tradition and highlights actionable levers for managing employee responses in AI-mediated service ecosystems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48399,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services","volume":"90 ","pages":"Article 104706"},"PeriodicalIF":13.1,"publicationDate":"2025-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145840762","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-24DOI: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2025.104705
Gauthier Casteran , Polymeros Chrysochou
This study examines how the structure of the private label brand (PLB) market influences national brand (NB) loyalty. Focusing on distinct PLB tiers - discount, standard, and premium - we provide insights into how these tiers, individually and collectively, affect NB loyalty. Drawing on consumer panel data from Denmark covering 29 FMCG categories (2006–2022), we analyze how key PLB metrics - price, assortment size, and market share – relate to NB loyalty. The findings demonstrate that treating PLBs collectively yields results that differ markedly from tier-specific analysis, underscoring the unique impact of each tier. This tiered approach reveals that PLB strategies at various levels generate varied competitive outcomes for NBs. The study contributes to branding and retailing research by (i) demonstrating that PLBs are better conceptualized as a tiered rather than a homogeneous structure, (ii) extending cue utilization theory to explain how PLB tier signals influence consumer loyalty, and (iii) providing managerial guidance on how tier-specific PLB strategies can either reinforce or erode NB loyalty.
{"title":"Unpacking private labels: How discount, standard, and premium tiers shape national brand loyalty","authors":"Gauthier Casteran , Polymeros Chrysochou","doi":"10.1016/j.jretconser.2025.104705","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jretconser.2025.104705","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study examines how the structure of the private label brand (PLB) market influences national brand (NB) loyalty. Focusing on distinct PLB tiers - discount, standard, and premium - we provide insights into how these tiers, individually and collectively, affect NB loyalty. Drawing on consumer panel data from Denmark covering 29 FMCG categories (2006–2022), we analyze how key PLB metrics - price, assortment size, and market share – relate to NB loyalty. The findings demonstrate that treating PLBs collectively yields results that differ markedly from tier-specific analysis, underscoring the unique impact of each tier. This tiered approach reveals that PLB strategies at various levels generate varied competitive outcomes for NBs. The study contributes to branding and retailing research by (i) demonstrating that PLBs are better conceptualized as a tiered rather than a homogeneous structure, (ii) extending cue utilization theory to explain how PLB tier signals influence consumer loyalty, and (iii) providing managerial guidance on how tier-specific PLB strategies can either reinforce or erode NB loyalty.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48399,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services","volume":"90 ","pages":"Article 104705"},"PeriodicalIF":13.1,"publicationDate":"2025-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145840786","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-23DOI: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2025.104692
Minjun Kim , Kyuho Maeng , Do-Hyeon Ryu
Although evaluating the service quality is crucial, conventional methods often fail to produce effective strategies. Existing text mining research typically analyzes in isolation critical service aspects (the ‘what’), or associated customer actions (the ‘how’). Consequently, they failed to connect the identified problems to specific prioritized solutions. Therefore, this study developed and validated a novel action-oriented methodology for deriving prioritized improvement strategies. The methodology consists of three stages: (1) using transformer-based topic modeling to extract critical service aspects, (2) estimating the importance of each aspect for customer satisfaction through an interpretable AI model, and (3) calculating a priority score for each aspect-action pair to create a data-driven ranking of improvement targets. An analysis of 231,705 online reviews of Roblox metaverse services demonstrated the effectiveness of the framework. This approach empowers managers to move beyond generic feedback and strategically allocate resources to the most critical aspect-action pairs, ensuring that service enhancements are more tangible and impactful.
{"title":"Integrating customer actions into aspect-based service quality evaluation: A text mining framework","authors":"Minjun Kim , Kyuho Maeng , Do-Hyeon Ryu","doi":"10.1016/j.jretconser.2025.104692","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jretconser.2025.104692","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Although evaluating the service quality is crucial, conventional methods often fail to produce effective strategies. Existing text mining research typically analyzes in isolation critical service aspects (the ‘what’), or associated customer actions (the ‘how’). Consequently, they failed to connect the identified problems to specific prioritized solutions. Therefore, this study developed and validated a novel action-oriented methodology for deriving prioritized improvement strategies. The methodology consists of three stages: (1) using transformer-based topic modeling to extract critical service aspects, (2) estimating the importance of each aspect for customer satisfaction through an interpretable AI model, and (3) calculating a priority score for each aspect-action pair to create a data-driven ranking of improvement targets. An analysis of 231,705 online reviews of Roblox metaverse services demonstrated the effectiveness of the framework. This approach empowers managers to move beyond generic feedback and strategically allocate resources to the most critical aspect-action pairs, ensuring that service enhancements are more tangible and impactful.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48399,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services","volume":"90 ","pages":"Article 104692"},"PeriodicalIF":13.1,"publicationDate":"2025-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145840788","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}