首页 > 最新文献

Agricultural & Environmental Letters最新文献

英文 中文
Pasture cropping and keyline plow as strategies to mitigate compaction in clay soils in Vermont 在佛蒙特州,牧场种植和keyline犁作为缓解粘土压实的策略
IF 3.6 4区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Pub Date : 2025-06-11 DOI: 10.1002/ael2.70023
Berdakh Utemuratov, Juan P. Alvez, Paliza Shrestha, Joshua W. Faulkner

Field plot experiments were conducted over 3 years at two farm sites in Vermont to evaluate the effects of mechanical subsoiling and three pasture cropping mixes on soil compaction across rotationally grazed pasturelands with contrasting management histories in Vermont. Penetration resistance was measured across the 0–45.7 cm profile using both profile-level and depth-stratified analyses. Among the biological treatments, the sudangrass-based mix achieved the greatest compaction alleviation, particularly at the site with higher initial severity. At the northern site (Health Hero [HH] Farm), this mix produced significantly lower median penetration resistance (1.59 MPa) and a narrower interquartile range (0.93 MPa) than other treatments, indicating more uniform soil improvement. At the southern site (Philo Ridge [PR] Farm), keyline plowing resulted in the lowest median resistance (1.41 MPa) but showed greater variability across replicates. Depth-wise trends revealed that biological mixes, particularly the sudangrass-based mix, provided consistent alleviation across soil layers. These findings highlight the value of biologically tailored strategies not only for reducing compaction but also for achieving spatially uniform soil structure recovery. Tailoring species composition to compaction depth offers a practical and lower disturbance alternative to mechanical tillage for improving pasture systems.

在佛蒙特州的两个农场进行了为期3年的田间小区试验,以评估机械深埋和三种牧草混合种植对佛蒙特州不同管理历史的轮牧牧场土壤压实的影响。通过剖面水平和深度分层分析,测量了0-45.7 cm剖面的穿透阻力。在生物处理中,苏丹草混合处理的压实缓解效果最大,特别是在初始严重程度较高的场地。在北部场地(Health Hero [HH] Farm),与其他处理相比,该混合处理的中位数渗透阻力(1.59 MPa)显著降低,四分位数间距(0.93 MPa)更窄,表明土壤改良更均匀。在南部站点(Philo Ridge [PR] Farm),关键线耕作的中位抗性最低(1.41 MPa),但在重复中表现出较大的变异性。深度趋势表明,生物混合,特别是苏丹草混合,在土层之间提供了一致的缓解。这些发现强调了生物定制策略的价值,不仅可以减少压实,而且可以实现空间均匀的土壤结构恢复。根据压实深度调整物种组成为改善草场系统提供了一种实用的、低干扰的替代机械耕作方法。
{"title":"Pasture cropping and keyline plow as strategies to mitigate compaction in clay soils in Vermont","authors":"Berdakh Utemuratov,&nbsp;Juan P. Alvez,&nbsp;Paliza Shrestha,&nbsp;Joshua W. Faulkner","doi":"10.1002/ael2.70023","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ael2.70023","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Field plot experiments were conducted over 3 years at two farm sites in Vermont to evaluate the effects of mechanical subsoiling and three pasture cropping mixes on soil compaction across rotationally grazed pasturelands with contrasting management histories in Vermont. Penetration resistance was measured across the 0–45.7 cm profile using both profile-level and depth-stratified analyses. Among the biological treatments, the sudangrass-based mix achieved the greatest compaction alleviation, particularly at the site with higher initial severity. At the northern site (Health Hero [HH] Farm), this mix produced significantly lower median penetration resistance (1.59 MPa) and a narrower interquartile range (0.93 MPa) than other treatments, indicating more uniform soil improvement. At the southern site (Philo Ridge [PR] Farm), keyline plowing resulted in the lowest median resistance (1.41 MPa) but showed greater variability across replicates. Depth-wise trends revealed that biological mixes, particularly the sudangrass-based mix, provided consistent alleviation across soil layers. These findings highlight the value of biologically tailored strategies not only for reducing compaction but also for achieving spatially uniform soil structure recovery. Tailoring species composition to compaction depth offers a practical and lower disturbance alternative to mechanical tillage for improving pasture systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":48502,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural & Environmental Letters","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2025-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ael2.70023","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144256358","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Impacts of long-term tillage and fertilization on soil carbon stock and aggregate stability in tropical agriculture 长期耕作和施肥对热带农业土壤碳储量和团聚体稳定性的影响
IF 3.6 4区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Pub Date : 2025-05-22 DOI: 10.1002/ael2.70019
Phongsakon Tantarawongsa, Amnat Chidthaisong, Surachet Aramrak, Kazuyuki Yagi, Sudarut Tripetchkul, Patikorn Sriphirom, Wattanai Onsamrarn, Wanida Nobuntou, Wanlee Amornpon

This study investigates the effects of tillage and fertilization on the changes of soil organic carbon (SOC) stock in a 46-year long-term field experiment in Thailand. The economic cropping system was maize–mung bean rotation. The experiment treatments included plots with tillage, no tillage, chemical fertilizer, organic amendment, and combination of chemical and organic fertilizer. No-tillage significantly increased soil aggregate stability (water-stable aggregates [WSA], mean weight diameter, and geometric mean diameter). However, only rice straw applications enhanced WSA. SOC stocks of the same soil mass ranged from 21.7 to 40.1 Mg C ha−1. The highest SOC stock (40.1 Mg C ha−1) and sequestration rate (0.40 Mg C ha−1 year−1) were observed in no-tillage plots with cow dung and chemical fertilizer. These findings underscore the significant potential of integrated practices involving no-tillage and organic amendments to improve soil structure and carbon sequestration in tropical agricultural systems.

Core Ideas

  • Long-term tillage practice decreased soil aggregate stability.
  • Crop residue incorporation preserved soil aggregate stability and increased soil organic carbon (SOC) stock.
  • No-till supplemented with chemical fertilizer and cow dung enhanced SOC stock.
在泰国进行了为期46年的长期田间试验,研究了耕作和施肥对土壤有机碳储量变化的影响。经济种植制度为玉米-绿豆轮作。试验处理包括有耕、免耕、化肥、有机改良剂和有机肥配施。免耕显著提高了土壤团聚体稳定性(水稳性团聚体[WSA]、平均重径和几何平均直径)。然而,只有稻草能提高WSA。土壤有机碳储量在21.7 ~ 40.1 Mg C ha−1之间。施用牛粪和化肥的免耕土壤有机碳储量最高(40.1 Mg C ha−1),固存率最高(0.40 Mg C ha−1年−1)。这些发现强调了包括免耕和有机改良在内的综合实践在改善热带农业系统土壤结构和碳固存方面的巨大潜力。长期耕作降低了土壤团聚体稳定性。秸秆掺入保持了土壤团聚体稳定性,增加了土壤有机碳储量。免耕补施化肥和牛粪可提高土壤有机碳含量。
{"title":"Impacts of long-term tillage and fertilization on soil carbon stock and aggregate stability in tropical agriculture","authors":"Phongsakon Tantarawongsa,&nbsp;Amnat Chidthaisong,&nbsp;Surachet Aramrak,&nbsp;Kazuyuki Yagi,&nbsp;Sudarut Tripetchkul,&nbsp;Patikorn Sriphirom,&nbsp;Wattanai Onsamrarn,&nbsp;Wanida Nobuntou,&nbsp;Wanlee Amornpon","doi":"10.1002/ael2.70019","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ael2.70019","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <p>This study investigates the effects of tillage and fertilization on the changes of soil organic carbon (SOC) stock in a 46-year long-term field experiment in Thailand. The economic cropping system was maize–mung bean rotation. The experiment treatments included plots with tillage, no tillage, chemical fertilizer, organic amendment, and combination of chemical and organic fertilizer. No-tillage significantly increased soil aggregate stability (water-stable aggregates [WSA], mean weight diameter, and geometric mean diameter). However, only rice straw applications enhanced WSA. SOC stocks of the same soil mass ranged from 21.7 to 40.1 Mg C ha<sup>−1</sup>. The highest SOC stock (40.1 Mg C ha<sup>−1</sup>) and sequestration rate (0.40 Mg C ha<sup>−1</sup> year<sup>−1</sup>) were observed in no-tillage plots with cow dung and chemical fertilizer. These findings underscore the significant potential of integrated practices involving no-tillage and organic amendments to improve soil structure and carbon sequestration in tropical agricultural systems.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Core Ideas</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <div>\u0000 <ul>\u0000 \u0000 <li>Long-term tillage practice decreased soil aggregate stability.</li>\u0000 \u0000 <li>Crop residue incorporation preserved soil aggregate stability and increased soil organic carbon (SOC) stock.</li>\u0000 \u0000 <li>No-till supplemented with chemical fertilizer and cow dung enhanced SOC stock.</li>\u0000 </ul>\u0000 </div>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":48502,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural & Environmental Letters","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2025-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ael2.70019","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144117849","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The value and broader impacts of agricultural and environmental scientific meetings 农业和环境科学会议的价值和广泛影响
IF 3.6 4区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Pub Date : 2025-05-22 DOI: 10.1002/ael2.70018
Aaron Lee M. Daigh, Samira H. Daroub, Peter M. Kyveryga, Mark E. Sorrells, James A. Ippolito, Endy Kailer, Shannon L. Osborne, Felix B. Fritschi, Wade E. Thomason, Ronald F. Turco, Michael A. Grusak, Carrie A. M. Laboski, Seth C. Murray, Kimberly A. Garland-Campbell, Joann K. Whalen, Kristen S. Veum, Nathan Ehresman, Zoe Brindley, James M. Cudahy

The socioeconomic value of content presented at the ASA-CSSA-SSSA (where ASA-CSSA-SSSA is American Society of Agronomy–Crop Science Society of America–Soil Science Society of America) Annual Meetings from 2014 to 2023 is estimated at $64.2 billion and is presented in this commentary as a thought exercise, highlighting the potential scale of research dissemination in scientific meetings. Scientific meetings are instrumental for propelling the quality and advancement of research via fostering timely feedback, knowledge dissemination, fresh perspectives, stimulation for networking and new collaborations, preparing scientists for public engagement, and addressing contemporary challenges of cultural accessibility and opportunity. Additionally, the broader impacts include near-term benefits to agricultural and environmental scientists that can transform careers and perspectives on the world, especially for students and early career members. The benefits from these impacts on scientists are then anticipated to propagate into broader and longer term positive impacts on humanity worldwide. In this commentary, we offer the above as a provocation to spark peer discussion on evaluating scientific meetings’ contributions, alongside a working list of broader impacts to inspire philosophical and methodological innovations for quantifying their value.

2014年至2023年,在美国农学会-美国作物科学学会-美国土壤科学学会年会(ASA-CSSA-SSSA)上发表的内容的社会经济价值估计为642亿美元,并在本评论中作为思想练习提出,突出了科学会议中研究传播的潜在规模。科学会议通过促进及时反馈、知识传播、新观点、促进网络和新合作、为科学家参与公众活动做好准备,以及应对文化可及性和机遇方面的当代挑战,有助于提高研究质量和进步。此外,更广泛的影响包括农业和环境科学家的短期利益,可以改变职业和对世界的看法,特别是对学生和早期职业成员。这些对科学家的影响所带来的好处,预计将对全世界的人类产生更广泛、更长期的积极影响。在这篇评论中,我们提供上述内容作为一种挑衅,以激发同行对评估科学会议贡献的讨论,同时提供一份更广泛影响的工作清单,以激发量化其价值的哲学和方法创新。
{"title":"The value and broader impacts of agricultural and environmental scientific meetings","authors":"Aaron Lee M. Daigh,&nbsp;Samira H. Daroub,&nbsp;Peter M. Kyveryga,&nbsp;Mark E. Sorrells,&nbsp;James A. Ippolito,&nbsp;Endy Kailer,&nbsp;Shannon L. Osborne,&nbsp;Felix B. Fritschi,&nbsp;Wade E. Thomason,&nbsp;Ronald F. Turco,&nbsp;Michael A. Grusak,&nbsp;Carrie A. M. Laboski,&nbsp;Seth C. Murray,&nbsp;Kimberly A. Garland-Campbell,&nbsp;Joann K. Whalen,&nbsp;Kristen S. Veum,&nbsp;Nathan Ehresman,&nbsp;Zoe Brindley,&nbsp;James M. Cudahy","doi":"10.1002/ael2.70018","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ael2.70018","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The socioeconomic value of content presented at the ASA-CSSA-SSSA (where ASA-CSSA-SSSA is American Society of Agronomy–Crop Science Society of America–Soil Science Society of America) Annual Meetings from 2014 to 2023 is estimated at $64.2 billion and is presented in this commentary as a thought exercise, highlighting the potential scale of research dissemination in scientific meetings. Scientific meetings are instrumental for propelling the quality and advancement of research via fostering timely feedback, knowledge dissemination, fresh perspectives, stimulation for networking and new collaborations, preparing scientists for public engagement, and addressing contemporary challenges of cultural accessibility and opportunity. Additionally, the broader impacts include near-term benefits to agricultural and environmental scientists that can transform careers and perspectives on the world, especially for students and early career members. The benefits from these impacts on scientists are then anticipated to propagate into broader and longer term positive impacts on humanity worldwide. In this commentary, we offer the above as a provocation to spark peer discussion on evaluating scientific meetings’ contributions, alongside a working list of broader impacts to inspire philosophical and methodological innovations for quantifying their value.</p>","PeriodicalId":48502,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural & Environmental Letters","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2025-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ael2.70018","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144118220","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Think outside the plots: Perimeter measurements and spatial modeling mitigate confounding in a 145-year experiment 在地块之外思考:周长测量和空间建模减轻了145年实验中的混淆
IF 3.6 4区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Pub Date : 2025-05-19 DOI: 10.1002/ael2.70020
Eric Potash, Yuhei Nakayama, Michael Douglass, Guadalupe Gonzalez, Andrew J. Margenot

Long-term experiments (LTEs) offer unique insights into the effects of agricultural practices on soil organic carbon (SOC). However, early LTEs commonly lack treatment randomization, replication, and initial measurements of SOC. This creates a potential problem of unmeasured confounding. We address this problem using the Morrow Plots (established 1876) as a case study. We start with a standard mixed effects model of SOC and add (i) a spatial kriging component and (ii) SOC measurements in the sod perimeter of the experiment as an additional treatment level. We find that much of the observed SOC variation between treatments after 145 years is not due to treatments but other factors (e.g. initial SOC), attenuating treatment effects by about 50%. Our study demonstrates that creative measurement and innovative modeling can mitigate some deficiencies in early LTEs. However, our improved estimates still have limited precision, suggesting the importance of careful design and measurement in the first place.

长期试验为研究农业实践对土壤有机碳(SOC)的影响提供了独特的见解。然而,早期lte通常缺乏治疗随机化、复制和SOC的初始测量。这就产生了一个潜在的无法测量的混杂问题。我们使用Morrow地块(建立于1876年)作为案例研究来解决这个问题。我们从有机碳的标准混合效应模型开始,并添加(i)空间克里格分量和(ii)实验草坪周长的有机碳测量作为额外的处理水平。我们发现,145年后不同处理之间所观察到的大部分碳含量变化不是由于处理,而是由于其他因素(如初始碳含量),使处理效果减弱了约50%。我们的研究表明,创造性的测量和创新的建模可以减轻早期lte的一些缺陷。然而,我们改进的估计仍然具有有限的精度,这表明首先仔细设计和测量的重要性。
{"title":"Think outside the plots: Perimeter measurements and spatial modeling mitigate confounding in a 145-year experiment","authors":"Eric Potash,&nbsp;Yuhei Nakayama,&nbsp;Michael Douglass,&nbsp;Guadalupe Gonzalez,&nbsp;Andrew J. Margenot","doi":"10.1002/ael2.70020","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ael2.70020","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Long-term experiments (LTEs) offer unique insights into the effects of agricultural practices on soil organic carbon (SOC). However, early LTEs commonly lack treatment randomization, replication, and initial measurements of SOC. This creates a potential problem of unmeasured confounding. We address this problem using the Morrow Plots (established 1876) as a case study. We start with a standard mixed effects model of SOC and add (i) a spatial kriging component and (ii) SOC measurements in the sod perimeter of the experiment as an additional treatment level. We find that much of the observed SOC variation between treatments after 145 years is not due to treatments but other factors (e.g. initial SOC), attenuating treatment effects by about 50%. Our study demonstrates that creative measurement and innovative modeling can mitigate some deficiencies in early LTEs. However, our improved estimates still have limited precision, suggesting the importance of careful design and measurement in the first place.</p>","PeriodicalId":48502,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural & Environmental Letters","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ael2.70020","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144085315","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Lime equivalence values of 19 biochar products made from defatted cottonseed meal, poultry litter, and woody sources for quality assessment 由脱脂棉籽粕、家禽垃圾和木质来源制成的19种生物炭产品的石灰等价值用于质量评估
IF 3.6 4区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Pub Date : 2025-05-05 DOI: 10.1002/ael2.70017
Olaniyi Adewumi, Zhongqi He, Renuka Dhandapani, Mingxin Guo

The lime equivalence, expressed in calcium carbonate equivalent (CCE), is an important quality parameter of biochar as a soil amendment. This work measured the CCE values and the relevant physicochemical parameters of seven defatted cottonseed meal-, seven poultry litter-, and five wood-based biochar products. The CCE of the 19 biochar samples covered a wide range of values from 2.75 to 128.0 g CaCO3 kg−1. Furthermore, the lime equivalence showed a significant (p < 0.05) correlation with the pH parameter, but not (p > 0.05) with the organic content, ash content, electrical conductivity, and sum of soluble base cations. As biochar products with greater lime equivalence have the advantages to substantially reduce soil acidity and improve soil fertility, information derived from this work would shed light on biochar product optimization and appraisals for preferably rectifying strongly acidic soils via efficiently neutralizing soil acids, raising soil pH, and enhancing soil health and productivity.

Core Ideas

  • Lime equivalence values and relevant parameters of 19 agricultural and forest byproduct biochar samples were measured.
  • The measured lime equivalence of biochar covered a wide range from 2.8 to 128.0 g CaCO3 per kg of mass.
  • The lime equivalence of biochar samples shows meaningful (p < 0.05) correlation with pH parameter.
  • Total soluble base cations show significant (p < 0.05) correlations with the electrical conductivity and ash content.
石灰当量,以碳酸钙当量(CCE)表示,是生物炭作为土壤改良剂的重要质量参数。本研究测量了7种脱脂棉籽粕、7种家禽垃圾和5种木质生物炭产品的CCE值和相关理化参数。19个生物炭样品的CCE值范围从2.75到128.0 g CaCO3 kg−1。此外,石灰等效性表现出显著的(p <;0.05)与pH参数相关,但与(p >;0.05),与有机质含量、灰分含量、电导率、可溶性碱阳离子数有关。具有较高石灰当量的生物炭产品具有显著降低土壤酸度和提高土壤肥力的优势,本研究所得的信息将为生物炭产品的优化和评价提供依据,通过有效中和土壤酸,提高土壤pH值,增强土壤健康和生产力,更好地矫正强酸性土壤。测定了19种农林副产生物炭样品的石灰等效值及相关参数。测量的生物炭石灰当量范围从每千克质量2.8至128.0克CaCO3。生物炭样品的石灰等效性显示出有意义的(p <;0.05)与pH参数相关。总可溶性碱阳离子(p <;0.05)与电导率和灰分含量呈正相关。
{"title":"Lime equivalence values of 19 biochar products made from defatted cottonseed meal, poultry litter, and woody sources for quality assessment","authors":"Olaniyi Adewumi,&nbsp;Zhongqi He,&nbsp;Renuka Dhandapani,&nbsp;Mingxin Guo","doi":"10.1002/ael2.70017","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ael2.70017","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <p>The lime equivalence, expressed in calcium carbonate equivalent (CCE), is an important quality parameter of biochar as a soil amendment. This work measured the CCE values and the relevant physicochemical parameters of seven defatted cottonseed meal-, seven poultry litter-, and five wood-based biochar products. The CCE of the 19 biochar samples covered a wide range of values from 2.75 to 128.0 g CaCO<sub>3</sub> kg<sup>−1</sup>. Furthermore, the lime equivalence showed a significant (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05) correlation with the pH parameter, but not (<i>p</i> &gt; 0.05) with the organic content, ash content, electrical conductivity, and sum of soluble base cations. As biochar products with greater lime equivalence have the advantages to substantially reduce soil acidity and improve soil fertility, information derived from this work would shed light on biochar product optimization and appraisals for preferably rectifying strongly acidic soils via efficiently neutralizing soil acids, raising soil pH, and enhancing soil health and productivity.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Core Ideas</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <div>\u0000 <ul>\u0000 \u0000 <li>Lime equivalence values and relevant parameters of 19 agricultural and forest byproduct biochar samples were measured.</li>\u0000 \u0000 <li>The measured lime equivalence of biochar covered a wide range from 2.8 to 128.0 g CaCO<sub>3</sub> per kg of mass.</li>\u0000 \u0000 <li>The lime equivalence of biochar samples shows meaningful (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05) correlation with pH parameter.</li>\u0000 \u0000 <li>Total soluble base cations show significant (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05) correlations with the electrical conductivity and ash content.</li>\u0000 </ul>\u0000 </div>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":48502,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural & Environmental Letters","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2025-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ael2.70017","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143905057","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Fertilizer Recommendation Support Tool: A relational database and decision interface tool 肥料推荐支持工具:一个关系数据库和决策接口工具
IF 3.6 4区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Pub Date : 2025-04-20 DOI: 10.1002/ael2.70016
Megan Bourns, Greg Buol, John T. Spargo, Luke Gatiboni, Matt A. Yost, Nathan A. Slaton, Deanna L. Osmond

The Fertilizer Recommendation Support Tool (FRST) Project is a collaborative effort involving most land grant institutions, USDA branches, nonprofit organizations, and private industry. The FRST objectives are to develop a soil fertility community of practice, preserve soil test correlation and calibration data in a relational database, and develop a decision tool to provide consistent soil test interpretations. Released in April 2024, the interactive tool acts on an evolving database that contained 1455 P trials, 1316 K trials, and 143 S trials from 44 states and Puerto Rico by March 1, 2025. Decision tool outputs include an interactive county-level map of available data and an estimated critical soil test value. The FRST relational database is a repository for soil-test-based P, K, and S data to support data-driven management recommendations. Continued success of the FRST project and decision tool utility rely on collaboration and support from the soil-test-based nutrient management community.

肥料推荐支持工具(FRST)项目是一项涉及大多数土地赠款机构、美国农业部分支机构、非营利组织和私营企业的合作努力。FRST的目标是建立一个土壤肥力实践社区,在关系数据库中保存土壤测试相关性和校准数据,并开发决策工具以提供一致的土壤测试解释。该交互式工具于2024年4月发布,其作用于一个不断发展的数据库,该数据库截至2025年3月1日包含来自44个州和波多黎各的1455个P试验、1316个K试验和143个S试验。决策工具的输出包括可用数据的交互式县级地图和估计的关键土壤测试值。FRST关系数据库是基于土壤测试的P、K和S数据的存储库,以支持数据驱动的管理建议。FRST项目的持续成功和决策工具的效用依赖于基于土壤试验的养分管理界的合作和支持。
{"title":"The Fertilizer Recommendation Support Tool: A relational database and decision interface tool","authors":"Megan Bourns,&nbsp;Greg Buol,&nbsp;John T. Spargo,&nbsp;Luke Gatiboni,&nbsp;Matt A. Yost,&nbsp;Nathan A. Slaton,&nbsp;Deanna L. Osmond","doi":"10.1002/ael2.70016","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ael2.70016","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The Fertilizer Recommendation Support Tool (FRST) Project is a collaborative effort involving most land grant institutions, USDA branches, nonprofit organizations, and private industry. The FRST objectives are to develop a soil fertility community of practice, preserve soil test correlation and calibration data in a relational database, and develop a decision tool to provide consistent soil test interpretations. Released in April 2024, the interactive tool acts on an evolving database that contained 1455 P trials, 1316 K trials, and 143 S trials from 44 states and Puerto Rico by March 1, 2025. Decision tool outputs include an interactive county-level map of available data and an estimated critical soil test value. The FRST relational database is a repository for soil-test-based P, K, and S data to support data-driven management recommendations. Continued success of the FRST project and decision tool utility rely on collaboration and support from the soil-test-based nutrient management community.</p>","PeriodicalId":48502,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural & Environmental Letters","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2025-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ael2.70016","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143852914","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Phosphorus application rates and farmers’ perceptions of environmental concerns 磷肥施用量与农民对环境问题的看法
IF 3.6 4区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Pub Date : 2025-04-02 DOI: 10.1002/ael2.70014
Sampriti Sarkar, Frank Lupi, Bruno Basso

Fertilizer overapplication remains a persistent challenge in several US watersheds. Farmer attitudes play a key role in nutrient management decisions, but few studies link farmer attitudes to phosphorus(P) fertilizer application rates. This study analyzes survey responses from 1650 Michigan corn farmers to assess P application behaviors and attitudes. The objective is to identify factors influencing P management and evaluate differences between P-overapplying and non-overapplying farmers. Overapplication is based on self-reported P use and soil P levels, and differences are tested using chi-square tests. Results show significant differences in attitudes, perceptions, and management practices between the two groups. Overapplying farmers express greater concern about nutrient runoff, suggesting they may be receptive to interventions. This study emphasizes the need to address P overapplication and improve information dissemination through agricultural consultants, soil testing laboratories, and extension services, as 55% of farmers reported not receiving recent information on P yield response.

Core Ideas

  • Farmer attitudes and perceptions are critical factors influencing management practice adoption.
  • Self-reported survey data for 1650 corn farmers in Michigan reveal phosphorus (P) fertilizer overapplication.
  • Farmers that overapply P fertilizer have different attitudes than other farmers.
  • Farmers overapplying P fertilizer indicate higher environmental concerns.
化肥过度施用仍然是美国几个流域持续存在的挑战。农民的态度在养分管理决策中起着关键作用,但很少有研究将农民的态度与磷肥施用量联系起来。本研究分析了1650名密歇根州玉米种植者的调查反馈,以评估P施用行为和态度。目的是确定影响磷肥管理的因素,并评价过量施用磷肥和不过量施用磷肥农民之间的差异。过度施用是基于自我报告的磷使用和土壤磷水平,并使用卡方检验检验差异。结果显示,两组人在态度、观念和管理实践方面存在显著差异。过度施肥的农民对养分流失表达了更大的担忧,这表明他们可能接受干预。该研究强调需要解决磷肥过量施用问题,并通过农业顾问、土壤测试实验室和推广服务改善信息传播,因为55%的农民报告没有收到有关磷肥产量响应的最新信息。农民的态度和观念是影响管理实践采用的关键因素。对密歇根州1650名种植玉米的农民自行报告的调查数据显示磷肥过度施用。过量施用磷肥的农民与其他农民的态度不同。过量施用磷肥的农民表明环境问题更严重。
{"title":"Phosphorus application rates and farmers’ perceptions of environmental concerns","authors":"Sampriti Sarkar,&nbsp;Frank Lupi,&nbsp;Bruno Basso","doi":"10.1002/ael2.70014","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ael2.70014","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <p>Fertilizer overapplication remains a persistent challenge in several US watersheds. Farmer attitudes play a key role in nutrient management decisions, but few studies link farmer attitudes to phosphorus(P) fertilizer application rates. This study analyzes survey responses from 1650 Michigan corn farmers to assess P application behaviors and attitudes. The objective is to identify factors influencing P management and evaluate differences between P-overapplying and non-overapplying farmers. Overapplication is based on self-reported P use and soil P levels, and differences are tested using chi-square tests. Results show significant differences in attitudes, perceptions, and management practices between the two groups. Overapplying farmers express greater concern about nutrient runoff, suggesting they may be receptive to interventions. This study emphasizes the need to address P overapplication and improve information dissemination through agricultural consultants, soil testing laboratories, and extension services, as 55% of farmers reported not receiving recent information on P yield response.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Core Ideas</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <div>\u0000 <ul>\u0000 \u0000 <li>Farmer attitudes and perceptions are critical factors influencing management practice adoption.</li>\u0000 \u0000 <li>Self-reported survey data for 1650 corn farmers in Michigan reveal phosphorus (P) fertilizer overapplication.</li>\u0000 \u0000 <li>Farmers that overapply P fertilizer have different attitudes than other farmers.</li>\u0000 \u0000 <li>Farmers overapplying P fertilizer indicate higher environmental concerns.</li>\u0000 </ul>\u0000 </div>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":48502,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural & Environmental Letters","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ael2.70014","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143762093","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A dual tank precision sprayer to evaluate the interaction of 2,4-D choline and quizalofop-p-ethyl for control of volunteer corn in corn 用双罐精密喷雾器评价2,4- d胆碱与对乙quizalofp -p-ethyl防治玉米中自愿玉米的相互作用
IF 3.6 4区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Pub Date : 2025-03-25 DOI: 10.1002/ael2.70015
Adam Leise, Mandeep Singh, Nicolas Cafaro La Menza, Stevan Z. Knezevic, Amit J. Jhala

Quizalofop-p-ethyl (QPE) can control glufosinate/glyphosate-resistant corn (Zea mays L.) volunteers in corn resistant to aryloxyphenoxypropionates (Enlist corn). Mixing QPE with broadleaf herbicides such as 2,4-D choline can be antagonistic. A new precision sprayer with a dual tank/boom system can apply two herbicides simultaneously through separate nozzles, potentially reducing chemical antagonism. The objective of this study was to evaluate the interaction of QPE + 2,4-D choline applied via single tank or dual tank/boom system for controlling glufosinate/glyphosate-resistant corn volunteers in Enlist corn. Bin-run glufosinate/glyphosate-resistant corn was planted at 54,000 seeds ha−1 to mimic corn volunteers. At 14 days after application (DAA), the dual tank/boom application of QPE (39 g a.i. ha−1) and 2,4-D choline (1064 g a.e. ha−1) achieved 85% volunteer corn control, compared to 70% control with single tank mix. The single tank application of QPE + 2,4-D choline was 7%–26% antagonistic until 28 DAA. Conversely, dual tank application of QPE and 2,4-D choline was additive. Although dual tank application of QPE and 2,4-D choline did not have transient antagonism (14 DAA), it was otherwise eliminated by 28 DAA using the higher rate of QPE (77 g a.i. ha−1) in the tank mix. By 28 DAA, volunteer corn control was ≥92% across all treatments, with similar corn yield and no crop injury. The results suggest that a dual tank/boom system provided better volunteer corn control at 14 DAA; however, control was similar when using a higher rate of QPE (77 g a.i. ha−1) with 2,4-D choline in tank mix at 28 DAA.

Quizalofop-p-ethyl (QPE)可以控制抗草甘膦/草甘膦玉米(Zea mays L.)志愿者对芳氧苯氧丙酸(Enlist corn)玉米的抗性。QPE与2,4- d胆碱等阔叶除草剂混合具有拮抗作用。一种新型精密喷雾器具有双罐/臂架系统,可以通过单独的喷嘴同时施用两种除草剂,潜在地减少化学拮抗作用。本研究的目的是评估QPE + 2,4- d胆碱通过单罐或双罐/吊杆系统施用对Enlist corn中抗草铵膦/草甘膦玉米志愿者的相互作用。Bin-run抗草铵膦/草甘膦玉米以54,000种子/公顷的面积种植,以模拟玉米志愿者。在施用后14天(DAA), QPE (39 g a.i. ha - 1)和2,4- d胆碱(1064 g a.e. ha - 1)的双罐/吊杆施用达到85%的志愿玉米控制率,而单罐混合施用的控制率为70%。单罐应用QPE + 2,4- d胆碱至28 DAA时拮抗率为7%-26%。相反,QPE和2,4- d胆碱的双罐施用是可添加的。虽然QPE和2,4- d胆碱的双罐应用没有短暂的拮抗作用(14 DAA),但使用更高的QPE率(77 g a.i. ha - 1),它可以被28 DAA消除。到28 DAA时,所有处理的志愿者玉米控制率≥92%,玉米产量相近,无作物损伤。结果表明,双罐/吊臂系统在14 DAA时具有较好的志愿玉米控制效果;然而,在28 DAA时,当使用更高的QPE率(77 g a.i. ha - 1)和2,4- d胆碱时,对照结果相似。
{"title":"A dual tank precision sprayer to evaluate the interaction of 2,4-D choline and quizalofop-p-ethyl for control of volunteer corn in corn","authors":"Adam Leise,&nbsp;Mandeep Singh,&nbsp;Nicolas Cafaro La Menza,&nbsp;Stevan Z. Knezevic,&nbsp;Amit J. Jhala","doi":"10.1002/ael2.70015","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ael2.70015","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Quizalofop-p-ethyl (QPE) can control glufosinate/glyphosate-resistant corn (<i>Zea mays</i> L.) volunteers in corn resistant to aryloxyphenoxypropionates (Enlist corn). Mixing QPE with broadleaf herbicides such as 2,4-D choline can be antagonistic. A new precision sprayer with a dual tank/boom system can apply two herbicides simultaneously through separate nozzles, potentially reducing chemical antagonism. The objective of this study was to evaluate the interaction of QPE + 2,4-D choline applied via single tank or dual tank/boom system for controlling glufosinate/glyphosate-resistant corn volunteers in Enlist corn. Bin-run glufosinate/glyphosate-resistant corn was planted at 54,000 seeds ha<sup>−1</sup> to mimic corn volunteers. At 14 days after application (DAA), the dual tank/boom application of QPE (39 g a.i. ha<sup>−1</sup>) and 2,4-D choline (1064 g a.e. ha<sup>−1</sup>) achieved 85% volunteer corn control, compared to 70% control with single tank mix. The single tank application of QPE + 2,4-D choline was 7%–26% antagonistic until 28 DAA. Conversely, dual tank application of QPE and 2,4-D choline was additive. Although dual tank application of QPE and 2,4-D choline did not have transient antagonism (14 DAA), it was otherwise eliminated by 28 DAA using the higher rate of QPE (77 g a.i. ha<sup>−1</sup>) in the tank mix. By 28 DAA, volunteer corn control was ≥92% across all treatments, with similar corn yield and no crop injury. The results suggest that a dual tank/boom system provided better volunteer corn control at 14 DAA; however, control was similar when using a higher rate of QPE (77 g a.i. ha<sup>−1</sup>) with 2,4-D choline in tank mix at 28 DAA.</p>","PeriodicalId":48502,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural & Environmental Letters","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ael2.70015","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143698765","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Transferability of soil management assessment framework indices to detect best soil management strategies in tropical agroecosystems 热带农业生态系统土壤管理评价框架指标可转移性研究
IF 3.6 4区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Pub Date : 2025-03-16 DOI: 10.1002/ael2.70013
Helen C. S. Amorim, Amanda J. Ashworth, Gerson L. Drescher, Mohkam Singh, Marcio R. Nunes

Soil management assessment framework (SMAF) algorithms have not been validated for tropical soils, which can prevent proper SMAF-based soil health monitoring. This study tested SMAF's ability to detect soil health as affected by soil management practices in the Mid-South United States and Brazil for improving SMAF performance in tropical regions. Eleven SMAF studies published in Brazil (n = 166) and 56 from the Mid-South United States (n = 500) were compiled. Management groups were perennial (PER), no-till (NT), reduced tillage (RT), and conventional tillage (CT) systems. In the United States, SMAF soil quality index decreased as follows: PER ≥ RT ≥ NT = CT, while for Brazil, PER > NT = RT = CT. Macroaggregate and microbial biomass carbon scores under CT were overestimated, resulting in nonsignificant differences between conservation and conventional soil management. Revision of organic matter and textural parameters is needed to improve SMAF utilization in tropical agroecosystems.

土壤管理评估框架(SMAF)算法尚未在热带土壤中得到验证,这可能妨碍基于SMAF的土壤健康监测。本研究在美国中南部和巴西测试了SMAF检测受土壤管理实践影响的土壤健康的能力,以改善热带地区的SMAF绩效。汇总了在巴西发表的11项SMAF研究(n = 166)和在美国中南部发表的56项研究(n = 500)。管理组为多年生(PER)、免耕(NT)、免耕(RT)和常规耕作(CT)。美国SMAF土壤质量指数递减规律为PER≥RT≥NT = CT,巴西为PER >;nt = rt = ct。CT下的大团聚体和微生物生物量碳评分被高估,导致保护与传统土壤管理之间的差异不显著。为了提高热带农业生态系统对小土壤肥力的利用,需要修正有机质和结构参数。
{"title":"Transferability of soil management assessment framework indices to detect best soil management strategies in tropical agroecosystems","authors":"Helen C. S. Amorim,&nbsp;Amanda J. Ashworth,&nbsp;Gerson L. Drescher,&nbsp;Mohkam Singh,&nbsp;Marcio R. Nunes","doi":"10.1002/ael2.70013","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ael2.70013","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Soil management assessment framework (SMAF) algorithms have not been validated for tropical soils, which can prevent proper SMAF-based soil health monitoring. This study tested SMAF's ability to detect soil health as affected by soil management practices in the Mid-South United States and Brazil for improving SMAF performance in tropical regions. Eleven SMAF studies published in Brazil (<i>n</i> = 166) and 56 from the Mid-South United States (<i>n</i> = 500) were compiled. Management groups were perennial (PER), no-till (NT), reduced tillage (RT), and conventional tillage (CT) systems. In the United States, SMAF soil quality index decreased as follows: PER ≥ RT ≥ NT = CT, while for Brazil, PER &gt; NT = RT = CT. Macroaggregate and microbial biomass carbon scores under CT were overestimated, resulting in nonsignificant differences between conservation and conventional soil management. Revision of organic matter and textural parameters is needed to improve SMAF utilization in tropical agroecosystems.</p>","PeriodicalId":48502,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural & Environmental Letters","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2025-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ael2.70013","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143632813","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Environmental release of a safener fenclorim from rice (Oryza sativa L.) following seed treatment 水稻(Oryza sativa L.)种子处理后安全剂芬克乐啉的环境释放
IF 3.6 4区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Pub Date : 2025-02-07 DOI: 10.1002/ael2.70011
Jeong-In Hwang, Jason K. Norsworthy, Nanda Kumar, Tae-Hwa Kim

The safener fenclorim, effective in protecting rice (Oryza sativa L.) from the phytotoxicity of some herbicides, is regarded as a contaminant of emerging concern that may cause toxicological issues to ecosystems and humans who may consume the final harvested rice. This study investigated time-dependent environmental releases of fenclorim from rice seeds treated with the safener and insecticide with five different treatments. The treatment with fenclorim alone caused the greatest fenclorim releases from the seed, and the release magnitude was similar to the treatment that had fenclorim and insecticide in mixture. The fenclorim release was the least when treated with safener and insecticide in sequence. Based on the previous literatures, all fenclorim release magnitudes observed in this study were at toxicologically safe levels for various living organisms in the soil, and fenclorim residues determined in the final rice harvest were also safe levels below the instrumentally detectable level.

Core Ideas

  • Seed treatment with safener alone causes the largest fenclorim release to environments.
  • Seed treatment with safener and insecticide in sequence minimizes fenclorim releases.
  • Fenclorim residues in the final rice harvest were below the detectable level.
  • The fenclorim used will not cause residual issues in the ecosystem and harvested rice.
在保护水稻(Oryza sativa L.)免受某些除草剂的植物毒性方面有效的安全剂芬克罗林(fenclorim)被认为是一种日益受到关注的污染物,可能对生态系统和可能食用最终收获的水稻的人类造成毒理学问题。本研究以五种不同的安全剂和杀虫剂处理的水稻种子为研究对象,考察了芬氯虫啉的环境释放随时间的变化规律。单独施用芬克罗林的种子释放量最大,且释放量与混合施用芬克罗林的种子释放量相近。按安全剂和杀虫剂顺序处理时,芬克罗林释放量最小。根据以往的文献,本研究中观察到的芬氯乐啉释放量均处于土壤中各种生物的毒理学安全水平,并且在最终收获的水稻中检测到的芬氯乐啉残留量也低于仪器检测水平。单独使用安全剂处理种子会导致最大的芬克罗林释放到环境中。按顺序使用安全剂和杀虫剂对种子进行处理,可以最大限度地减少芬克虫啉的释放。最终收获的水稻中芬虫啉的残留量低于可检测水平。使用的氟氯虫啉不会在生态系统和收获的水稻中造成残留问题。
{"title":"Environmental release of a safener fenclorim from rice (Oryza sativa L.) following seed treatment","authors":"Jeong-In Hwang,&nbsp;Jason K. Norsworthy,&nbsp;Nanda Kumar,&nbsp;Tae-Hwa Kim","doi":"10.1002/ael2.70011","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ael2.70011","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <p>The safener fenclorim, effective in protecting rice (<i>Oryza sativa</i> L.) from the phytotoxicity of some herbicides, is regarded as a contaminant of emerging concern that may cause toxicological issues to ecosystems and humans who may consume the final harvested rice. This study investigated time-dependent environmental releases of fenclorim from rice seeds treated with the safener and insecticide with five different treatments. The treatment with fenclorim alone caused the greatest fenclorim releases from the seed, and the release magnitude was similar to the treatment that had fenclorim and insecticide in mixture. The fenclorim release was the least when treated with safener and insecticide in sequence. Based on the previous literatures, all fenclorim release magnitudes observed in this study were at toxicologically safe levels for various living organisms in the soil, and fenclorim residues determined in the final rice harvest were also safe levels below the instrumentally detectable level.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Core Ideas</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <div>\u0000 <ul>\u0000 \u0000 <li>Seed treatment with safener alone causes the largest fenclorim release to environments.</li>\u0000 \u0000 <li>Seed treatment with safener and insecticide in sequence minimizes fenclorim releases.</li>\u0000 \u0000 <li>Fenclorim residues in the final rice harvest were below the detectable level.</li>\u0000 \u0000 <li>The fenclorim used will not cause residual issues in the ecosystem and harvested rice.</li>\u0000 </ul>\u0000 </div>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":48502,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural & Environmental Letters","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ael2.70011","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143362516","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Agricultural & Environmental Letters
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1