The editorial board of Agricultural & Environmental Letters is pleased to announce the recipients of the 2023 Editor's Citation for Excellence. These awards recognize the outstanding professional commitment and dedication of volunteer reviewers and editors who, through their excellent insights and comments, have helped maintain the high standard and quality of papers published in the journal. Recipients were nominated based on their thorough, competent, and timely reviews or editing of manuscripts.
Agricultural & Environmental Letters》编辑部欣然宣布 2023 年度优秀编辑奖(Editor's Citation for Excellence)的获奖者名单。这些奖项旨在表彰志愿审稿人和编辑的杰出职业奉献和敬业精神,他们通过出色的见解和评论帮助保持了本刊发表论文的高标准和高质量。提名获奖者的依据是他们对稿件进行了全面、称职和及时的审阅或编辑。
{"title":"Recipients of 2023 A&EL Editor's Citation for Excellence named","authors":"","doi":"10.1002/ael2.20127","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ael2.20127","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The editorial board of <i>Agricultural & Environmental Letters</i> is pleased to announce the recipients of the 2023 Editor's Citation for Excellence. These awards recognize the outstanding professional commitment and dedication of volunteer reviewers and editors who, through their excellent insights and comments, have helped maintain the high standard and quality of papers published in the journal. Recipients were nominated based on their thorough, competent, and timely reviews or editing of manuscripts.</p>","PeriodicalId":48502,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural & Environmental Letters","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ael2.20127","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140550190","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Andrew J. Margenot, Jordon Wade, Finnleigh S. Woodings
In the last two decades, permanganate has been used to define what is assumed to be a labile or “active” soil carbon (C) pool, commonly referred to as “permanganate-oxidizable carbon” (POXC). However, uncertainties in the reduction reaction (Mn7+ → Mn4+/Mn2+) and even greater uncertainties in the oxidation reaction (C? → C?) as well as the reaction of non-C reductants in the soil sample preclude the calculation of milligram C per kilogram of soil oxidized. Combined variation in the reduction–oxidation reactions can entail up to fivefold variation in how much soil organic C is oxidized per unit permanganate reduced. Without determining final reduction state of Mn and the initial and final oxidation states of C, the amount of C oxidized cannot be calculated. Unless a concrete understanding of the reduction and oxidation half-reactions is achieved, an alternative expression of permanganate reactivity of a soil sample (i.e., not mg C kg−1 soil) is needed.
在过去的二十年中,高锰酸盐一直被用来定义土壤中的易变或 "活性 "碳(C)池,通常称为 "高锰酸盐氧化碳"(POXC)。然而,还原反应(Mn7+ → Mn4+/Mn2+)的不确定性和氧化反应(C? → C?)的更大不确定性,以及土壤样本中非碳还原剂的反应,都阻碍了每千克土壤氧化毫克碳的计算。还原-氧化反应的综合变化可导致每单位高锰酸盐还原所氧化的土壤有机碳的数量变化高达五倍。如果不确定 Mn 的最终还原状态以及 C 的初始和最终氧化状态,就无法计算 C 的氧化量。除非对还原和氧化半反应有了具体的了解,否则就需要对土壤样本的高锰酸盐反应性(即不是毫克 C kg-1 土壤)进行替代表达。
{"title":"The misuse of permanganate as a quantitative measure of soil organic carbon","authors":"Andrew J. Margenot, Jordon Wade, Finnleigh S. Woodings","doi":"10.1002/ael2.20124","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ael2.20124","url":null,"abstract":"<p>In the last two decades, permanganate has been used to define what is assumed to be a labile or “active” soil carbon (C) pool, commonly referred to as “permanganate-oxidizable carbon” (POXC). However, uncertainties in the reduction reaction (Mn<sup>7+</sup> → Mn<sup>4+</sup>/Mn<sup>2+</sup>) and even greater uncertainties in the oxidation reaction (C<sup>?</sup> → C<sup>?</sup>) as well as the reaction of non-C reductants in the soil sample preclude the calculation of milligram C per kilogram of soil oxidized. Combined variation in the reduction–oxidation reactions can entail up to fivefold variation in how much soil organic C is oxidized per unit permanganate reduced. Without determining final reduction state of Mn and the initial and final oxidation states of C, the amount of C oxidized cannot be calculated. Unless a concrete understanding of the reduction and oxidation half-reactions is achieved, an alternative expression of permanganate reactivity of a soil sample (i.e., not mg C kg<sup>−1</sup> soil) is needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":48502,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural & Environmental Letters","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ael2.20124","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140541137","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Cover crops are promoted by agronomists and governments due to their on-farm and off-farm benefits. Incentive programs were created because high planting costs have hindered cover crop adoption in the United States. Crop insurance discount programs are novel incentives that subsidize farmers’ crop insurance premiums by $5 per acre ($12.36 ha−1) on cover cropped land. While this payment is smaller than those typically offered through the Natural Resources Conservation Service and state-level cost-share programs, crop insurance discount programs have the potential to reach a significant proportion of farmers who purchase crop insurance. This paper uses data from a survey of Iowa farmers to quantify whether participation in the Iowa Crop Insurance Discount Program (ICIDP) affects the area planted to cover crops. I find that 11% of the ICIDP area would not have been planted to cover crops in the absence of the program, which is similar to other programs after considering the lower payment rate.
{"title":"Are crop insurance discount programs for cover crops effective? Evidence from Iowa","authors":"Wendiam P. M. Sawadgo","doi":"10.1002/ael2.20125","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ael2.20125","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Cover crops are promoted by agronomists and governments due to their on-farm and off-farm benefits. Incentive programs were created because high planting costs have hindered cover crop adoption in the United States. Crop insurance discount programs are novel incentives that subsidize farmers’ crop insurance premiums by $5 per acre ($12.36 ha<sup>−1</sup>) on cover cropped land. While this payment is smaller than those typically offered through the Natural Resources Conservation Service and state-level cost-share programs, crop insurance discount programs have the potential to reach a significant proportion of farmers who purchase crop insurance. This paper uses data from a survey of Iowa farmers to quantify whether participation in the Iowa Crop Insurance Discount Program (ICIDP) affects the area planted to cover crops. I find that 11% of the ICIDP area would not have been planted to cover crops in the absence of the program, which is similar to other programs after considering the lower payment rate.</p>","PeriodicalId":48502,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural & Environmental Letters","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ael2.20125","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140541092","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Alexandra Huddell, Brian Needelman, Eugene P. Law, Victoria J. Ackroyd, Muthukumar V. Bagavathiannan, Kevin Bradley, Adam S. Davis, Jeffery A. Evans, Wesley Jay Everman, Michael Flessner, Nicholas Jordan, Lauren M. Schwartz-Lazaro, Ramon G. Leon, John Lindquist, Jason K. Norsworthy, Lovreet S. Shergill, Mark VanGessel, Steven B. Mirsky