Agricultural systems are vulnerable to extreme weather, market volatility, and changing socio-cultural contexts. Despite efforts to create transformational solutions in agriculture to ensure economic, social, and environmental sustainability, there is often a disconnect between research findings and real-world experience. Co-production is a collaborative process that engages farmers, ranchers, and other community members as equals in research design and implementation, incorporates diverse knowledges, and includes community members as research decision-makers. While co-production requires more time, trust, and institutional support, it offers greater research impact and increased public support for science as a problem-solving tool. We share three case studies from our own research, and an introduction to the literature featuring best practices, to illustrate pathways for integrating co-production in research programs.
{"title":"Co-produced agricultural research can provide value for communities while building trust and public support for science","authors":"Alison J. Duff, Hailey Wilmer, Jules Reynolds","doi":"10.1002/ael2.70053","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ael2.70053","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Agricultural systems are vulnerable to extreme weather, market volatility, and changing socio-cultural contexts. Despite efforts to create transformational solutions in agriculture to ensure economic, social, and environmental sustainability, there is often a disconnect between research findings and real-world experience. Co-production is a collaborative process that engages farmers, ranchers, and other community members as equals in research design and implementation, incorporates diverse knowledges, and includes community members as research decision-makers. While co-production requires more time, trust, and institutional support, it offers greater research impact and increased public support for science as a problem-solving tool. We share three case studies from our own research, and an introduction to the literature featuring best practices, to illustrate pathways for integrating co-production in research programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":48502,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural & Environmental Letters","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2025-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ael2.70053","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145842990","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Kelly R. Wilson, Tanner O. Rankin, Jordon Wade, Timothy Haithcoat, Jenny Melo-Velasco, Olivia Caillouet, Donna Brandt, Catherine Brockert
Many soil health indicators have been developed by researchers to aid farmer decision-making yet rarely incorporate farmer preferences in the presentation of that data. To fill this gap, we conducted focus groups with Midwestern row crop farmers to elicit the characteristics they want to translate data from soil health indicators into useable information that inform management decisions. Farmers were interested in the potential economic and conservation benefits of soil health, but current soil health report outputs are difficult to understand and put in practice. Farmers wanted clear management guidance that is tailored to their specific edaphic context. While they expressed ambivalence about specific indicators, they wanted to understand a full picture of their soil health. Moreover, they expressed interest in using the information to both affirm current management practices and adopt future practices. Findings suggest that improved alignment of current research questions with stakeholder needs can help harness the potential of soil health.
{"title":"Turning numbers into knowledge: Farmer-preferred approaches for soil health reporting","authors":"Kelly R. Wilson, Tanner O. Rankin, Jordon Wade, Timothy Haithcoat, Jenny Melo-Velasco, Olivia Caillouet, Donna Brandt, Catherine Brockert","doi":"10.1002/ael2.70048","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ael2.70048","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Many soil health indicators have been developed by researchers to aid farmer decision-making yet rarely incorporate farmer preferences in the presentation of that data. To fill this gap, we conducted focus groups with Midwestern row crop farmers to elicit the characteristics they want to translate data from soil health indicators into useable information that inform management decisions. Farmers were interested in the potential economic and conservation benefits of soil health, but current soil health report outputs are difficult to understand and put in practice. Farmers wanted clear management guidance that is tailored to their specific edaphic context. While they expressed ambivalence about specific indicators, they wanted to understand a full picture of their soil health. Moreover, they expressed interest in using the information to both affirm current management practices and adopt future practices. Findings suggest that improved alignment of current research questions with stakeholder needs can help harness the potential of soil health.</p>","PeriodicalId":48502,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural & Environmental Letters","volume":"10 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2025-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ael2.70048","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145824515","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}