首页 > 最新文献

Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology最新文献

英文 中文
Current trends in the medial side of the knee: not only medial collateral ligament (MCL). 目前的趋势在膝关节内侧:不仅仅是内侧副韧带(MCL)。
IF 3 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2024-12-20 DOI: 10.1186/s10195-024-00808-9
Gian Andrea Lucidi, Luca Solaro, Alberto Grassi, Mohammad Ibrahim Alhalalmeh, Stefano Ratti, Lucia Manzoli, Stefano Zaffagnini

The medial collateral ligament (MCL) is by far the most commonly injured ligament of the knee. The medial ligament complex covers a broad bony surface on the extraarticular portion of the femur and is highly vascularized, which allows for a high healing potential. For this reason, most MCL complex lesions were treated conservatively in the past. However, recent advancements regarding the MCL anatomy and kinematics highlighted the complex biomechanical behavior of the isolated and combined MCL lesion, and it is now fully appreciated that some MCL lesions warrant surgical treatment. The present review aims to provide the reader with an overview of the new evidence and advancement on the complex anatomy, biomechanics, and treatment of the MCL.

内侧副韧带(MCL)是迄今为止最常见的膝关节韧带损伤。内侧韧带复合体覆盖股骨关节外部分广阔的骨表面,血管化程度高,具有很高的愈合潜力。因此,过去大多数MCL复杂病变都是保守治疗。然而,最近关于MCL解剖和运动学的进展强调了孤立和合并MCL病变的复杂生物力学行为,现在充分认识到一些MCL病变需要手术治疗。本综述旨在为读者提供关于MCL复杂解剖、生物力学和治疗的新证据和进展的概述。
{"title":"Current trends in the medial side of the knee: not only medial collateral ligament (MCL).","authors":"Gian Andrea Lucidi, Luca Solaro, Alberto Grassi, Mohammad Ibrahim Alhalalmeh, Stefano Ratti, Lucia Manzoli, Stefano Zaffagnini","doi":"10.1186/s10195-024-00808-9","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s10195-024-00808-9","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The medial collateral ligament (MCL) is by far the most commonly injured ligament of the knee. The medial ligament complex covers a broad bony surface on the extraarticular portion of the femur and is highly vascularized, which allows for a high healing potential. For this reason, most MCL complex lesions were treated conservatively in the past. However, recent advancements regarding the MCL anatomy and kinematics highlighted the complex biomechanical behavior of the isolated and combined MCL lesion, and it is now fully appreciated that some MCL lesions warrant surgical treatment. The present review aims to provide the reader with an overview of the new evidence and advancement on the complex anatomy, biomechanics, and treatment of the MCL.</p>","PeriodicalId":48603,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology","volume":"25 1","pages":"69"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11662134/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142865917","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Differences in microorganism profile in periprosthetic joint infections of the hip in patients affected by chronic kidney disease. 慢性肾脏疾病患者髋关节假体周围感染的微生物谱差异
IF 3 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2024-12-19 DOI: 10.1186/s10195-024-00806-x
Davide Stimolo, Maximilian Budin, Domenico De Mauro, Eduardo Suero, Thorsten Gehrke, Mustafa Citak

Background: Patients affected by chronic kidney disease (CKD) are at increased risk of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) after total hip arthroplasty (THA). This patient population has a higher risk of recurrent infections and hospitalization. The aim of this study is to compare the profile of microorganisms in patients with CKD and PJI of the hip versus controls and to individuate potentially unusual and drug-resistant microorganisms among the causative bacteria.

Materials and methods: A total of 4261 patients affected by PJI of the hip were retrospectively studied. Patients affected by CKD in this population were identified and compared with a control group of patients with PJI but without CKD. Data on patient characteristics and comorbidities were collected. The microorganisms responsible for PJI were identified and compared between both groups.

Results: The CKD group included 409 patients, 54.3% male, mean age of 73.8 ± 8.9 years, a higher body mass index (BMI) than the general population (29.88 ± 5.90 kg/m2), and higher age-adjusted CCI of 6.15 ± 2.35. Overall, 70 different isolates of microorganisms were identified, including 52 Gram-positive spp., 28 Gram-negative spp., 3 fungi, and 1 mycobacterium. Polymicrobial infections were more common in CKD group than controls (47.9% versus 30.9%; p < 0.0001). Staphylococcus spp. were the most common bacteria in both groups, followed by Gram-negative Enterobacteriaceae and Streptococcus spp. CKD group showed a higher risk of developing infections caused by Staphylococcus aureus (p = 0.003), Gram-negative bacteria, and Candida (p = 0.035).

Conclusions: Renal failure exposes patients who undergo THA to PJI caused by microorganisms that are potentially more drug resistant, leading to a higher risk of treatment failure. Knowing in advance the different microorganism profiles could help to plan a different surgical strategy.

Level of evidence iii:

背景:慢性肾脏疾病(CKD)患者在全髋关节置换术(THA)后假体周围关节感染(PJI)的风险增加。这类患者复发感染和住院的风险较高。本研究的目的是比较CKD和髋关节PJI患者与对照组的微生物特征,并对致病细菌中潜在的不寻常和耐药微生物进行个化。材料和方法:对4261例髋关节PJI患者进行回顾性研究。在这一人群中,受CKD影响的患者被确定,并与无CKD的PJI患者对照组进行比较。收集患者特征和合并症的数据。鉴定了导致PJI的微生物,并对两组进行了比较。结果:CKD组409例,男性54.3%,平均年龄73.8±8.9岁,体重指数(BMI)高于普通人群(29.88±5.90 kg/m2),年龄调整CCI为6.15±2.35。总共鉴定出70株不同的微生物,包括52株革兰氏阳性菌,28株革兰氏阴性菌,3株真菌和1株分枝杆菌。CKD组多微生物感染比对照组更常见(47.9%比30.9%;p结论:肾功能衰竭使接受THA的患者暴露于由微生物引起的PJI,这些微生物可能更耐药,导致更高的治疗失败风险。提前了解不同的微生物特征有助于制定不同的手术策略。证据等级iii:
{"title":"Differences in microorganism profile in periprosthetic joint infections of the hip in patients affected by chronic kidney disease.","authors":"Davide Stimolo, Maximilian Budin, Domenico De Mauro, Eduardo Suero, Thorsten Gehrke, Mustafa Citak","doi":"10.1186/s10195-024-00806-x","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s10195-024-00806-x","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients affected by chronic kidney disease (CKD) are at increased risk of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) after total hip arthroplasty (THA). This patient population has a higher risk of recurrent infections and hospitalization. The aim of this study is to compare the profile of microorganisms in patients with CKD and PJI of the hip versus controls and to individuate potentially unusual and drug-resistant microorganisms among the causative bacteria.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 4261 patients affected by PJI of the hip were retrospectively studied. Patients affected by CKD in this population were identified and compared with a control group of patients with PJI but without CKD. Data on patient characteristics and comorbidities were collected. The microorganisms responsible for PJI were identified and compared between both groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The CKD group included 409 patients, 54.3% male, mean age of 73.8 ± 8.9 years, a higher body mass index (BMI) than the general population (29.88 ± 5.90 kg/m<sup>2</sup>), and higher age-adjusted CCI of 6.15 ± 2.35. Overall, 70 different isolates of microorganisms were identified, including 52 Gram-positive spp., 28 Gram-negative spp., 3 fungi, and 1 mycobacterium. Polymicrobial infections were more common in CKD group than controls (47.9% versus 30.9%; p < 0.0001). Staphylococcus spp. were the most common bacteria in both groups, followed by Gram-negative Enterobacteriaceae and Streptococcus spp. CKD group showed a higher risk of developing infections caused by Staphylococcus aureus (p = 0.003), Gram-negative bacteria, and Candida (p = 0.035).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Renal failure exposes patients who undergo THA to PJI caused by microorganisms that are potentially more drug resistant, leading to a higher risk of treatment failure. Knowing in advance the different microorganism profiles could help to plan a different surgical strategy.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence iii: </strong></p>","PeriodicalId":48603,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology","volume":"25 1","pages":"67"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11659542/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142865918","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Efficacy of platelet-rich plasma in meniscal repair surgery: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. 富血小板血浆在半月板修复手术中的疗效:随机对照试验的系统回顾。
IF 3 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2024-12-18 DOI: 10.1186/s10195-024-00799-7
Giovanni Sergio Utrilla, Irene Roman Degano, Riccardo D'Ambrosi

Purpose: This study's primary objective was to evaluate the effectiveness of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) administration for meniscal injuries treated with meniscal repair procedures (sutures), using radiologic measures and clinical scales. The secondary objective was to identify potential bias-inducing elements in the analyzed studies.

Methods: In December 2023, a systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, and Scopus for randomized controlled trials. This review compares PRP with placebo. Three studies were finally selected. The risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane's Risk of Bias Tool 2. Radiologic evaluation of meniscal healing was measured with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and arthroscopic studies, while clinical evaluation was performed using four scales [Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), visual analog scale (VAS), International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form (IKDC), and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Index (WOMAC)] and by recording the incidence of complications.

Results: The three selected studies included 139 patients; of these, 76 (54.7%) were randomly assigned to the intervention group (PRP injection) and 63 (45.3%) to the control group (placebo). The mean age of the intervention group was 37.4 ± 7.5 years, while the mean age of the control group was 36.5 ± 9.2 years. There were 41 female patients (29.5%). The median follow-up duration was 27.58 ± 17.3 months. MRI evaluation did not show a significant improvement in the PRP group in any of the studies (p-value = 0.41-0.54). However, when assessed by the cumulative evaluation of MRI and arthroscopy, the cumulative failure rate was significantly better in the PRP group (p-value = 0.04-0.048). One study that evaluated isolated arthroscopy also showed significant improvement in the PRP group (p = 0.003). Regarding the VAS scale, no study demonstrated a significant difference, except for one study that showed significant improvement after 6 months and in the difference between the 3rd and 6th months. The KOOS scale yielded conflicting results; one study showed no significant difference, while the other two indicated significant improvement. The IKDC and WOMAC scales were evaluated in two studies, showing opposite results. All included studies reported no complications, and one study indicated no increased risk in the treatment group.

Conclusions: The results of this review indicate the necessity for further studies to make a definitive statement about the effectiveness of PRP administration in meniscal repair processes. Level of evidence Systematic review and meta-analysis of articles of level 1.

目的:本研究的主要目的是评估富血小板血浆(PRP)给药对半月板修复手术(缝合)治疗半月板损伤的有效性,采用放射学测量和临床量表。次要目的是在分析的研究中确定潜在的偏倚诱发因素。方法:2023年12月,系统检索PubMed、Cochrane、Embase和Scopus中随机对照试验。本综述比较了PRP和安慰剂。最终选择了三个研究。使用Cochrane's risk of bias Tool 2评估偏倚风险。通过磁共振成像(MRI)和关节镜检查对半月板愈合进行放射学评估,而临床评估采用四种量表[膝关节损伤和骨关节炎结局评分(oos)、视觉模拟评分(VAS)、国际膝关节文献委员会主观膝关节形态(IKDC)和西安大略省和麦克马斯特大学指数(WOMAC)]并记录并发症发生率。结果:3项入选研究纳入139例患者;其中,76人(54.7%)被随机分配到干预组(PRP注射),63人(45.3%)被随机分配到对照组(安慰剂)。干预组平均年龄37.4±7.5岁,对照组平均年龄36.5±9.2岁。女性41例(29.5%)。中位随访时间为27.58±17.3个月。在所有研究中,MRI评估均未显示PRP组有显著改善(p值= 0.41-0.54)。然而,当通过MRI和关节镜的累积评估评估时,PRP组的累积失败率明显更好(p值= 0.04-0.048)。一项评估孤立关节镜的研究也显示PRP组有显著改善(p = 0.003)。在VAS量表上,除了有一项研究在6个月后以及第3个月和第6个月的差异中显示有显著改善外,没有研究显示有显著差异。oos量表得出的结果相互矛盾;一项研究显示没有显著差异,而另外两项研究显示显著改善。两项研究对IKDC和WOMAC量表进行了评估,结果相反。所有纳入的研究均未报告并发症,其中一项研究表明治疗组的风险没有增加。结论:本综述的结果表明需要进一步的研究来明确PRP在半月板修复过程中的有效性。证据水平1级文献的系统评价和荟萃分析。
{"title":"Efficacy of platelet-rich plasma in meniscal repair surgery: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.","authors":"Giovanni Sergio Utrilla, Irene Roman Degano, Riccardo D'Ambrosi","doi":"10.1186/s10195-024-00799-7","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s10195-024-00799-7","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study's primary objective was to evaluate the effectiveness of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) administration for meniscal injuries treated with meniscal repair procedures (sutures), using radiologic measures and clinical scales. The secondary objective was to identify potential bias-inducing elements in the analyzed studies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In December 2023, a systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, and Scopus for randomized controlled trials. This review compares PRP with placebo. Three studies were finally selected. The risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane's Risk of Bias Tool 2. Radiologic evaluation of meniscal healing was measured with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and arthroscopic studies, while clinical evaluation was performed using four scales [Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), visual analog scale (VAS), International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form (IKDC), and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Index (WOMAC)] and by recording the incidence of complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The three selected studies included 139 patients; of these, 76 (54.7%) were randomly assigned to the intervention group (PRP injection) and 63 (45.3%) to the control group (placebo). The mean age of the intervention group was 37.4 ± 7.5 years, while the mean age of the control group was 36.5 ± 9.2 years. There were 41 female patients (29.5%). The median follow-up duration was 27.58 ± 17.3 months. MRI evaluation did not show a significant improvement in the PRP group in any of the studies (p-value = 0.41-0.54). However, when assessed by the cumulative evaluation of MRI and arthroscopy, the cumulative failure rate was significantly better in the PRP group (p-value = 0.04-0.048). One study that evaluated isolated arthroscopy also showed significant improvement in the PRP group (p = 0.003). Regarding the VAS scale, no study demonstrated a significant difference, except for one study that showed significant improvement after 6 months and in the difference between the 3rd and 6th months. The KOOS scale yielded conflicting results; one study showed no significant difference, while the other two indicated significant improvement. The IKDC and WOMAC scales were evaluated in two studies, showing opposite results. All included studies reported no complications, and one study indicated no increased risk in the treatment group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results of this review indicate the necessity for further studies to make a definitive statement about the effectiveness of PRP administration in meniscal repair processes. Level of evidence Systematic review and meta-analysis of articles of level 1.</p>","PeriodicalId":48603,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology","volume":"25 1","pages":"63"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11656006/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142855881","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Efficacy and safety of quadriceps tendon autograft versus bone-patellar tendon-bone and hamstring tendon autografts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. 自体股四头肌肌腱与骨-髌-骨和腘绳肌腱自体移植物重建前交叉韧带的疗效和安全性:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。
IF 3 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2024-12-18 DOI: 10.1186/s10195-024-00801-2
Xiao-Feng Zhang, Pan Liu, Jun-Wu Huang, Yao-Hua He

Background: Quadriceps tendon (QT), bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB), and hamstring tendon (HT) autografts are widely used for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), but the optimal autograft choice remains controversial. This study assessed the treatment effects of QT versus BPTB and HT autografts for ACLR.

Methods: The PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched for eligible studies published from inception until July 2022. Effect estimates were presented as odds ratios (OR) and weighted mean differences (WMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for categorical and continuous variables, respectively. All pooled analyses were performed using a random-effects model.

Results: Twenty-one studies (3 randomized controlled trials [RCTs], 3 prospective studies, and 15 retrospective studies) involving 2964 patients with ACLR were selected for meta-analysis. Compared with the HT autograft, the QT autograft was associated with a reduced risk of graft failure (OR: 0.46; 95% CI: 0.23-0.93; P = 0.031). Compared with the BPTB autograft, the QT autograft was associated with a reduced risk of donor site pain (OR: 0.16; 95% CI: 0.10-0.24; P < 0.001). Moreover, the QT autograft was associated with a lower side-to-side difference than that observed with the HT autograft (WMD: - 0.74; 95% CI: - 1.47 to - 0.01; P = 0.048). Finally, compared with the BPTB autograft, the QT autograft was associated with a reduced risk of moderate-to-severe kneecap symptoms during sports and work activities (OR: 0.14; 95% CI: 0.05-0.37; P < 0.001).

Conclusions: The findings of this study suggest that the QT autograft can be defined as a safe and effective alternative choice for ACLR, but its superiority is yet to be proven by RCTs and prospective studies. Level of evidence Level III.

背景:股四头肌肌腱(QT)、骨-髌腱-骨(BPTB)和腘绳肌腱(HT)自体移植物被广泛用于前交叉韧带重建(ACLR),但最佳自体移植物的选择仍然存在争议。本研究评估了QT与BPTB和HT自体移植对ACLR的治疗效果。方法:系统检索PubMed、Embase和Cochrane图书馆数据库,检索从成立到2022年7月发表的符合条件的研究。对于分类变量和连续变量,效果估计分别以95%置信区间(CI)的比值比(OR)和加权平均差(WMD)表示。所有合并分析均采用随机效应模型。结果:21项研究(3项随机对照试验,3项前瞻性研究,15项回顾性研究)共2964例ACLR患者纳入meta分析。与HT自体移植相比,QT自体移植可降低移植失败的风险(OR: 0.46;95% ci: 0.23-0.93;p = 0.031)。与BPTB自体移植相比,QT自体移植与供体部位疼痛风险降低相关(OR: 0.16;95% ci: 0.10-0.24;结论:本研究结果提示自体QT移植是ACLR安全有效的替代选择,但其优越性有待随机对照试验和前瞻性研究的证实。证据等级三级。
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of quadriceps tendon autograft versus bone-patellar tendon-bone and hamstring tendon autografts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Xiao-Feng Zhang, Pan Liu, Jun-Wu Huang, Yao-Hua He","doi":"10.1186/s10195-024-00801-2","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s10195-024-00801-2","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Quadriceps tendon (QT), bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB), and hamstring tendon (HT) autografts are widely used for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), but the optimal autograft choice remains controversial. This study assessed the treatment effects of QT versus BPTB and HT autografts for ACLR.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched for eligible studies published from inception until July 2022. Effect estimates were presented as odds ratios (OR) and weighted mean differences (WMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for categorical and continuous variables, respectively. All pooled analyses were performed using a random-effects model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-one studies (3 randomized controlled trials [RCTs], 3 prospective studies, and 15 retrospective studies) involving 2964 patients with ACLR were selected for meta-analysis. Compared with the HT autograft, the QT autograft was associated with a reduced risk of graft failure (OR: 0.46; 95% CI: 0.23-0.93; P = 0.031). Compared with the BPTB autograft, the QT autograft was associated with a reduced risk of donor site pain (OR: 0.16; 95% CI: 0.10-0.24; P < 0.001). Moreover, the QT autograft was associated with a lower side-to-side difference than that observed with the HT autograft (WMD: - 0.74; 95% CI: - 1.47 to - 0.01; P = 0.048). Finally, compared with the BPTB autograft, the QT autograft was associated with a reduced risk of moderate-to-severe kneecap symptoms during sports and work activities (OR: 0.14; 95% CI: 0.05-0.37; P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings of this study suggest that the QT autograft can be defined as a safe and effective alternative choice for ACLR, but its superiority is yet to be proven by RCTs and prospective studies. Level of evidence Level III.</p>","PeriodicalId":48603,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology","volume":"25 1","pages":"65"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11656020/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142855750","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
For many but not for all: the bikini incision direct anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty. A narrative review. 对于许多人,但不是所有人:比基尼切口直接前路全髋关节置换术。叙述性评论
IF 3 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2024-12-18 DOI: 10.1186/s10195-024-00812-z
Cesare Faldini, Francesco Traina, Federico Pilla, Claudio D'Agostino, Matteo Brunello, Manuele Morandi Guaitoli, Alberto Di Martino

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) has significantly improved the lives of patients with degenerative hip disorders. The direct anterior approach (DAA) is favored for its minimally invasive nature, leading to less postoperative pain and a faster recovery. The bikini incision (BI) approach was developed to enhance aesthetic outcomes while maintaining the clinical and functional benefits of the DAA. Despite its advantages, the BI technique presents challenges, controversies persist regarding its efficacy and safety, and there is no consensus within the medical community about its overall benefits. Incisions aligned with Langer's lines, like the BI, promote better healing and minimal scarring. Studies indicate that BI patients report higher satisfaction with scar appearance and texture compared to traditional DAA patients. However, the BI carries a higher risk of lateral femoral cutaneous nerve (LFCN) injury, although most symptoms resolve within 6 months. For obese patients, the BI is associated with fewer complications, such as infections and delayed healing, compared to the conventional DAA, making it a safe and effective option. BI patients also experience better aesthetic outcomes and functional recovery, with reduced pain and itching. The BI technique in THA represents a significant advancement, offering improved aesthetic and wound-healing outcomes. The shift from the traditional DAA to the BI aligns with patient preferences for scars that are less visible and conspicuous. Despite the steep learning curve and risks, careful patient selection and refined surgical techniques can enhance the BI's benefits. Future research should focus on long-term outcomes and comparative studies to further establish the BI's efficacy and safety. As patient demand for aesthetically favorable surgeries grows, the BI is likely to become a preferred approach in THA.

全髋关节置换术(THA)显著改善了退行性髋关节疾病患者的生活。直接前路手术(DAA)因其微创性、术后疼痛少、恢复快而受到青睐。比基尼切口(BI)方法的发展是为了在保持DAA的临床和功能优势的同时提高美学效果。尽管有其优势,但BI技术也存在挑战,关于其有效性和安全性的争议持续存在,医学界对其总体益处没有达成共识。与兰格纹一致的切口,比如BI,可以促进更好的愈合和最小的疤痕。研究表明,与传统的DAA患者相比,BI患者对疤痕外观和质地的满意度更高。然而,BI具有较高的股外侧皮神经(LFCN)损伤风险,尽管大多数症状在6个月内消退。对于肥胖患者,与传统的DAA相比,BI与感染和延迟愈合等并发症相关,使其成为一种安全有效的选择。BI患者也有更好的美学效果和功能恢复,疼痛和瘙痒减轻。在全髋关节置换术中,BI技术代表了一个重大的进步,提供了更好的美学和伤口愈合的结果。从传统的DAA到BI的转变符合患者对不太明显的疤痕的偏好。尽管有陡峭的学习曲线和风险,但仔细的患者选择和精细的手术技术可以提高BI的益处。未来的研究应侧重于长期结果和比较研究,以进一步确定BI的有效性和安全性。随着患者对美观手术需求的增长,BI可能成为THA的首选方法。
{"title":"For many but not for all: the bikini incision direct anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty. A narrative review.","authors":"Cesare Faldini, Francesco Traina, Federico Pilla, Claudio D'Agostino, Matteo Brunello, Manuele Morandi Guaitoli, Alberto Di Martino","doi":"10.1186/s10195-024-00812-z","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s10195-024-00812-z","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Total hip arthroplasty (THA) has significantly improved the lives of patients with degenerative hip disorders. The direct anterior approach (DAA) is favored for its minimally invasive nature, leading to less postoperative pain and a faster recovery. The bikini incision (BI) approach was developed to enhance aesthetic outcomes while maintaining the clinical and functional benefits of the DAA. Despite its advantages, the BI technique presents challenges, controversies persist regarding its efficacy and safety, and there is no consensus within the medical community about its overall benefits. Incisions aligned with Langer's lines, like the BI, promote better healing and minimal scarring. Studies indicate that BI patients report higher satisfaction with scar appearance and texture compared to traditional DAA patients. However, the BI carries a higher risk of lateral femoral cutaneous nerve (LFCN) injury, although most symptoms resolve within 6 months. For obese patients, the BI is associated with fewer complications, such as infections and delayed healing, compared to the conventional DAA, making it a safe and effective option. BI patients also experience better aesthetic outcomes and functional recovery, with reduced pain and itching. The BI technique in THA represents a significant advancement, offering improved aesthetic and wound-healing outcomes. The shift from the traditional DAA to the BI aligns with patient preferences for scars that are less visible and conspicuous. Despite the steep learning curve and risks, careful patient selection and refined surgical techniques can enhance the BI's benefits. Future research should focus on long-term outcomes and comparative studies to further establish the BI's efficacy and safety. As patient demand for aesthetically favorable surgeries grows, the BI is likely to become a preferred approach in THA.</p>","PeriodicalId":48603,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology","volume":"25 1","pages":"66"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11655770/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142855827","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Postoperative femoral head cartilage injury after hip arthroscopic treatment for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome and labral tear. 髋关节镜治疗股髋臼撞击综合征并发唇裂术后股骨头软骨损伤。
IF 3 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2024-12-18 DOI: 10.1186/s10195-024-00811-0
Guanying Gao, Yichuan Zhu, Siqi Zhang, Yingfang Ao, Jianquan Wang, Yan Xu

Background: Postoperative femoral head cartilage injury (FHCI) is a rare condition that can be observed in a certain proportion of patients undergoing hip arthroscopy. However, the prevalence and associated factors of FHCI, and the effect of this condition on clinical outcomes still remain unknown.

Patients and methods: Consecutive patients who were diagnosed with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) and labral tear and underwent hip arthroscopic treatment in our institute between July 2020 and July 2021 were retrospectively evaluated. Supine anteroposterior hip radiographs, cross-table lateral radiographs, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and computed tomography (CT) were obtained preoperatively. Postoperative MRI, at least 6 months after arthroscopy, was performed. Postoperative FHCI was evaluated by two surgeons through MRI. Preoperative patient-reported outcomes (PROs) including visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, and modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) before surgery and at final followup were obtained.

Results: A total of 196 patients were included. Postoperative FHCI was identified in 21 (10.7%) patients. The intraobserver reliability of the observer A and B for detecting postoperative FHCI using 3.0-T MRI was high (k = 0.929, and k = 0.947, respectively). The interobserver reliability between the two observers for detecting FHCI using 3.0-T MRI was high (k = 0.919). There was no significant difference in preoperative and postoperative mHHS, VAS, and percentage of patients who surpassed minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and achieved patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) between patients with and without postoperative FHCI (P > 0.05).

Conclusion: Although postoperative FHCI was observed in 10.7% of patients, which was associated with larger labrum, this condition did not result in inferior clinical outcomes. Level of evidence IV, retrospective case series. Trial registration The Chinese Clinical Trial Registry approved the registration (ChiCTR2200061166). The date of registration is 2022-06-15.

背景:术后股骨头软骨损伤(FHCI)是一种罕见的情况,在一定比例的髋关节镜患者中可以观察到。然而,FHCI的患病率和相关因素,以及这种情况对临床结果的影响仍然未知。患者和方法:回顾性评估2020年7月至2021年7月在我院连续诊断为股髋臼撞击综合征(FAIS)和唇部撕裂并接受髋关节镜治疗的患者。术前进行仰卧位髋关节正位片、跨台侧位片、磁共振成像(MRI)和计算机断层扫描(CT)。术后至少在关节镜检查后6个月进行MRI。术后FHCI由两名外科医生通过MRI评估。术前患者报告的结果(PROs)包括术前和最终随访时疼痛的视觉模拟评分(VAS)和改良Harris髋关节评分(mHHS)。结果:共纳入196例患者。术后21例(10.7%)患者发现FHCI。3.0 t MRI检测术后FHCI时,观察者A和观察者B的观察者内信度较高(k = 0.929, k = 0.947)。3.0 t MRI检测FHCI的观察者间信度较高(k = 0.919)。术后无FHCI患者术前术后mHHS、VAS、超过最小临床重要差异(MCID)及达到患者可接受症状状态(PASS)的患者比例差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。结论:虽然10.7%的患者术后出现FHCI,且伴有较大的阴唇,但这种情况并不会导致较差的临床结果。证据水平IV,回顾性病例系列。中国临床试验注册中心批准注册(ChiCTR2200061166)。注册日期为2022-06-15。
{"title":"Postoperative femoral head cartilage injury after hip arthroscopic treatment for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome and labral tear.","authors":"Guanying Gao, Yichuan Zhu, Siqi Zhang, Yingfang Ao, Jianquan Wang, Yan Xu","doi":"10.1186/s10195-024-00811-0","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s10195-024-00811-0","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Postoperative femoral head cartilage injury (FHCI) is a rare condition that can be observed in a certain proportion of patients undergoing hip arthroscopy. However, the prevalence and associated factors of FHCI, and the effect of this condition on clinical outcomes still remain unknown.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Consecutive patients who were diagnosed with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) and labral tear and underwent hip arthroscopic treatment in our institute between July 2020 and July 2021 were retrospectively evaluated. Supine anteroposterior hip radiographs, cross-table lateral radiographs, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and computed tomography (CT) were obtained preoperatively. Postoperative MRI, at least 6 months after arthroscopy, was performed. Postoperative FHCI was evaluated by two surgeons through MRI. Preoperative patient-reported outcomes (PROs) including visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, and modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) before surgery and at final followup were obtained.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 196 patients were included. Postoperative FHCI was identified in 21 (10.7%) patients. The intraobserver reliability of the observer A and B for detecting postoperative FHCI using 3.0-T MRI was high (k = 0.929, and k = 0.947, respectively). The interobserver reliability between the two observers for detecting FHCI using 3.0-T MRI was high (k = 0.919). There was no significant difference in preoperative and postoperative mHHS, VAS, and percentage of patients who surpassed minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and achieved patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) between patients with and without postoperative FHCI (P > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although postoperative FHCI was observed in 10.7% of patients, which was associated with larger labrum, this condition did not result in inferior clinical outcomes. Level of evidence IV, retrospective case series. Trial registration The Chinese Clinical Trial Registry approved the registration (ChiCTR2200061166). The date of registration is 2022-06-15.</p>","PeriodicalId":48603,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology","volume":"25 1","pages":"64"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11655738/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142856068","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Biphasic cartilage repair implant versus microfracture in the treatment of focal chondral and osteochondral lesions of the knee: a prospective, multi-center, randomized clinical trial. 双相软骨修复植入物与微骨折治疗膝关节局灶性软骨和骨软骨病变:一项前瞻性、多中心、随机临床试验
IF 3 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2024-11-30 DOI: 10.1186/s10195-024-00802-1
Tzu-Hao Tseng, Chao-Ping Chen, Ching-Chuan Jiang, Pei-Wei Weng, Yi-Sheng Chan, Horng-Chaung Hsu, Hongsen Chiang

Background: Autologous minced cartilage is a method for cartilage defect repair, and our study focuses on a newly developed biphasic cylindrical osteochondral construct designed for use in human knees. We aimed to compare its clinical effectiveness and safety with microfracture, the commonly utilized reparative treatment for knee chondral or osteochondral defects.

Materials and methods: Conducted as a prospective multicenter, randomized controlled, non-inferiority trial across nine hospitals, the study involved 92 patients with International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) grade 3 to 4 chondral or osteochondral lesions on femoral condyles. Patients were evenly randomized to receive either the biphasic cartilage-repair implant (BiCRI) or microfracture. Functional outcomes and safety assessments were conducted at postoperative intervals of 6 weeks and 3, 6, and 12 months. Primary and secondary endpoints included International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) 2000 Subjective Knee Evaluation Form score improvement, the grade distribution in the IKDC 2000 Knee Examination Form, and various assessments, such as the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), visual analog scales (VASs) for pain, MRI findings, and arthroscopic findings at 12 months.

Results: Out of the initial participants, 47 in the BiCRI group and 45 in the microfracture group completed the follow-up. At 12 months, the mean change in IKDC total score was 25.56 ± 18.48 for BiCRI and 27.51 ± 23.65 for microfracture. The 95% confidence interval (CI) for the score difference (BiCRI minus microfracture) was - 6.95, exceeding the non-inferiority margin of - 12. Secondary endpoints indicated comparable functional outcomes, and arthroscopic findings demonstrated more fully regenerated cartilage in the BiCRI group.

Conclusion: Based on the IKDC 2000 Subjective Knee Evaluation Form score, BiCRI proved non-inferior to microfracture at 12 months. Short-term functional outcomes were comparable to those with microfracture, while arthroscopic findings showed more complete cartilage regeneration in the BiCRI group. Consequently, BiCRI emerges as a viable alternative for treating chondral or osteochondral defects.

Level of evidence: Level 2, multi-center, randomized clinical trial.

Trial registration: Name of the registry: ClinicalTrials.gov.

Trial registration number: NCT01477008. Date of registration: 11/14/2011. URL of trial registry record: clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT01477008.

背景:自体碎软骨是软骨缺损修复的一种方法,我们的研究重点是一种新开发的用于人类膝关节的双相圆柱形骨软骨结构。我们的目的是比较其与微骨折的临床有效性和安全性,微骨折是膝关节软骨或骨软骨缺损的常用修复方法。材料和方法:作为一项前瞻性多中心、随机对照、非劣性试验,在9家医院进行,研究纳入了92例国际软骨修复学会(ICRS)评定的股骨髁3 - 4级软骨或骨软骨病变患者。患者平均随机接受双相软骨修复植入物(BiCRI)或微骨折。功能结果和安全性评估分别在术后6周、3、6和12个月进行。主要和次要终点包括国际膝关节文献委员会(IKDC) 2000主观膝关节评估表评分改善,IKDC 2000膝关节检查表中的分级分布,以及各种评估,如膝关节损伤和骨关节炎结局评分(oos),疼痛的视觉模拟量表(VASs), MRI结果和12个月的关节镜检查结果。结果:在最初的参与者中,BiCRI组有47人完成了随访,微骨折组有45人完成了随访。12个月时,BiCRI患者IKDC总分的平均变化为25.56±18.48,微骨折患者为27.51±23.65。评分差异(BiCRI减去微骨折)的95%置信区间(CI)为- 6.95,超过了- 12的非劣效性裕度。次要终点显示类似的功能结果,关节镜检查结果显示BiCRI组软骨再生更完全。结论:根据IKDC 2000主观膝关节评估表评分,BiCRI在12个月时证明不次于微骨折。短期功能结果与微骨折患者相当,而关节镜检查结果显示BiCRI组软骨再生更完全。因此,BiCRI成为治疗软骨或骨软骨缺损的可行替代方法。证据等级:2级,多中心,随机临床试验。试验注册:注册中心名称:clinicaltrials .gov.试验注册号:NCT01477008。注册日期:2011年11月14日。试用注册表记录的URL: clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT01477008。
{"title":"Biphasic cartilage repair implant versus microfracture in the treatment of focal chondral and osteochondral lesions of the knee: a prospective, multi-center, randomized clinical trial.","authors":"Tzu-Hao Tseng, Chao-Ping Chen, Ching-Chuan Jiang, Pei-Wei Weng, Yi-Sheng Chan, Horng-Chaung Hsu, Hongsen Chiang","doi":"10.1186/s10195-024-00802-1","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s10195-024-00802-1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Autologous minced cartilage is a method for cartilage defect repair, and our study focuses on a newly developed biphasic cylindrical osteochondral construct designed for use in human knees. We aimed to compare its clinical effectiveness and safety with microfracture, the commonly utilized reparative treatment for knee chondral or osteochondral defects.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Conducted as a prospective multicenter, randomized controlled, non-inferiority trial across nine hospitals, the study involved 92 patients with International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) grade 3 to 4 chondral or osteochondral lesions on femoral condyles. Patients were evenly randomized to receive either the biphasic cartilage-repair implant (BiCRI) or microfracture. Functional outcomes and safety assessments were conducted at postoperative intervals of 6 weeks and 3, 6, and 12 months. Primary and secondary endpoints included International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) 2000 Subjective Knee Evaluation Form score improvement, the grade distribution in the IKDC 2000 Knee Examination Form, and various assessments, such as the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), visual analog scales (VASs) for pain, MRI findings, and arthroscopic findings at 12 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of the initial participants, 47 in the BiCRI group and 45 in the microfracture group completed the follow-up. At 12 months, the mean change in IKDC total score was 25.56 ± 18.48 for BiCRI and 27.51 ± 23.65 for microfracture. The 95% confidence interval (CI) for the score difference (BiCRI minus microfracture) was - 6.95, exceeding the non-inferiority margin of - 12. Secondary endpoints indicated comparable functional outcomes, and arthroscopic findings demonstrated more fully regenerated cartilage in the BiCRI group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Based on the IKDC 2000 Subjective Knee Evaluation Form score, BiCRI proved non-inferior to microfracture at 12 months. Short-term functional outcomes were comparable to those with microfracture, while arthroscopic findings showed more complete cartilage regeneration in the BiCRI group. Consequently, BiCRI emerges as a viable alternative for treating chondral or osteochondral defects.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level 2, multi-center, randomized clinical trial.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Name of the registry: ClinicalTrials.gov.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>NCT01477008. Date of registration: 11/14/2011. URL of trial registry record: clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT01477008.</p>","PeriodicalId":48603,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology","volume":"25 1","pages":"62"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11608183/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142773833","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Risk factors for proximal radial abnormalities in children with untreated chronic Monteggia fractures: a review of 142 cases. 142例未经治疗的慢性蒙氏骨折患儿桡骨近端异常的危险因素
IF 3 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2024-11-29 DOI: 10.1186/s10195-024-00793-z
WenTao Wang, QianQian Mei, Hang Liu, YueMing Guo, HaiBo Mei, Federico Canavese, Antonio Andreacchio, HanQing Lyu, ShunYou Chen, ShengHua He

Background: The risk factors for proximal radial abnormalities (PRA) in paediatric patients with untreated chronic Monteggia fractures (CMFs) are unclear. This multicentre study aimed to evaluate the risk factors for PRA in children with untreated CMFs.

Materials and methods: The clinical data of 142 patients (mean age at the time of injury: 5.73 years) with untreated unilateral CMFs were retrospectively reviewed. The radial neck-shaft angle (RNSAP) and radial head size (RHL) were measured on anteroposterior (AP) and lateral (L) radiographs, respectively. The RHL size was the ratio of the widest width of the proximal radial metaphysis to the narrowest radial neck width. The En-RNSAP and En-RHL were the ratios of the enlargement (En) of the RNSAP angle and RHL size of the injured elbow to those of the uninjured elbow, respectively. Paired-sample t-tests, single-factor analyses and multiple linear regression analyses were performed to evaluate the correlation between the differences in these parameters between the injured and uninjured elbows and the assessed risk factors. These risk factors included institution, sex, laterality, age at injury, time from injury to diagnosis, direction of RH dislocation, distance of RH dislocation (DD-RH), presence of radial or median nerve injury, heterotopic ossification and immobilization of the elbow after injury.

Results: In children with untreated CMFs (mean time from injury to diagnosis: 14.6 months), Student's t-test revealed a significant difference in the RHL size (P < 0.001) but not in the RNSAP angle (P = 0.075) between the injured and uninjured elbows. Pearson correlation analysis revealed a potential correlation between En-RHL and age at the time of injury (P = 0.069), time from injury to diagnosis (P < 0.001) and DD-RH (P < 0.001), excluding other risk factors (P > 0.05). Multiple linear regression analysis revealed that age at the time of injury (P = 0.047), time from injury to diagnosis (P = 0.007) and DD-RH (P = 0.001) were risk factors for an increased En-RHL in patients with untreated CMFs; the variability in En-RHL among the other three risk factors was 21.4%.

Conclusions: In paediatric patients with unilateral untreated CMFs, PRA of the injured elbow consisted mainly of RH enlargement or radial neck narrowing rather than valgus deformities of the proximal radius. Older age at injury, increased time from injury to diagnosis and DD-RH were risk factors for more severe PRA.

Level of evidence: III.

背景:未经治疗的慢性蒙氏骨折(CMFs)患儿桡骨近端异常(PRA)的危险因素尚不清楚。这项多中心研究旨在评估未经治疗的CMFs儿童患PRA的危险因素。材料与方法:回顾性分析142例未经治疗的单侧CMFs患者(损伤时平均年龄5.73岁)的临床资料。分别在正位x线片(AP)和侧位x线片(L)上测量桡骨颈轴角(RNSAP)和桡骨头尺寸(RHL)。RHL的大小为桡骨干骺端最宽宽度与最窄桡骨颈宽度之比。En-RNSAP和En-RHL分别为损伤肘关节RNSAP角度和RHL大小增大与未损伤肘关节的比值(En)。通过配对样本t检验、单因素分析和多元线性回归分析来评估肘部损伤与未损伤患者这些参数差异与评估危险因素之间的相关性。这些危险因素包括机构、性别、侧侧、受伤年龄、从受伤到诊断的时间、RH脱位方向、RH脱位距离(DD-RH)、是否存在桡骨或正中神经损伤、损伤后肘关节异位骨化和固定。结果:在未经治疗的CMFs患儿中(从损伤到诊断的平均时间:14.6个月),学生t检验显示受伤和未受伤肘关节的RHL大小有显著差异(P < 0.001),但RNSAP角度无显著差异(P = 0.075)。Pearson相关分析显示En-RHL与损伤时年龄(P = 0.069)、损伤至诊断时间(P < 0.001)和DD-RH (P < 0.001)存在潜在相关性,排除其他危险因素(P < 0.05)。多元线性回归分析显示,损伤时的年龄(P = 0.047)、损伤至诊断的时间(P = 0.007)和DD-RH (P = 0.001)是未治疗CMFs患者En-RHL升高的危险因素;En-RHL在其他三个危险因素中的变异性为21.4%。结论:在单侧未经治疗的CMFs患儿中,受伤肘关节的PRA主要包括RH增大或桡骨颈变窄,而不是桡骨近端外翻畸形。损伤年龄较大,从损伤到诊断的时间增加和DD-RH是更严重的PRA的危险因素。证据水平:III。
{"title":"Risk factors for proximal radial abnormalities in children with untreated chronic Monteggia fractures: a review of 142 cases.","authors":"WenTao Wang, QianQian Mei, Hang Liu, YueMing Guo, HaiBo Mei, Federico Canavese, Antonio Andreacchio, HanQing Lyu, ShunYou Chen, ShengHua He","doi":"10.1186/s10195-024-00793-z","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s10195-024-00793-z","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The risk factors for proximal radial abnormalities (PRA) in paediatric patients with untreated chronic Monteggia fractures (CMFs) are unclear. This multicentre study aimed to evaluate the risk factors for PRA in children with untreated CMFs.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The clinical data of 142 patients (mean age at the time of injury: 5.73 years) with untreated unilateral CMFs were retrospectively reviewed. The radial neck-shaft angle (RNS<sub>AP</sub>) and radial head size (RH<sub>L</sub>) were measured on anteroposterior (AP) and lateral (L) radiographs, respectively. The RH<sub>L</sub> size was the ratio of the widest width of the proximal radial metaphysis to the narrowest radial neck width. The En-RNS<sub>AP</sub> and En-RH<sub>L</sub> were the ratios of the enlargement (En) of the RNS<sub>AP</sub> angle and RH<sub>L</sub> size of the injured elbow to those of the uninjured elbow, respectively. Paired-sample t-tests, single-factor analyses and multiple linear regression analyses were performed to evaluate the correlation between the differences in these parameters between the injured and uninjured elbows and the assessed risk factors. These risk factors included institution, sex, laterality, age at injury, time from injury to diagnosis, direction of RH dislocation, distance of RH dislocation (DD-RH), presence of radial or median nerve injury, heterotopic ossification and immobilization of the elbow after injury.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In children with untreated CMFs (mean time from injury to diagnosis: 14.6 months), Student's t-test revealed a significant difference in the RH<sub>L</sub> size (P < 0.001) but not in the RNS<sub>AP</sub> angle (P = 0.075) between the injured and uninjured elbows. Pearson correlation analysis revealed a potential correlation between En-RH<sub>L</sub> and age at the time of injury (P = 0.069), time from injury to diagnosis (P < 0.001) and DD-RH (P < 0.001), excluding other risk factors (P > 0.05). Multiple linear regression analysis revealed that age at the time of injury (P = 0.047), time from injury to diagnosis (P = 0.007) and DD-RH (P = 0.001) were risk factors for an increased En-RH<sub>L</sub> in patients with untreated CMFs; the variability in En-RH<sub>L</sub> among the other three risk factors was 21.4%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In paediatric patients with unilateral untreated CMFs, PRA of the injured elbow consisted mainly of RH enlargement or radial neck narrowing rather than valgus deformities of the proximal radius. Older age at injury, increased time from injury to diagnosis and DD-RH were risk factors for more severe PRA.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>III.</p>","PeriodicalId":48603,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology","volume":"25 1","pages":"60"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11607283/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142755372","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Biomechanical evaluation of percutaneous compression plate and femoral neck system in Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures. 经皮加压钢板与股骨颈系统治疗Pauwels III型股骨颈骨折的生物力学评价。
IF 3 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2024-11-29 DOI: 10.1186/s10195-024-00792-0
Xiaoping Xie, Songqi Bi, Qingxu Song, Qiong Zhang, Zhixing Yan, Xiaoyang Zhou, Tiecheng Yu

Background: The optimal treatment for Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures remains contentious. We aim to compare the biomechanical properties of three inverted cannulated compression screw (ICCS), femoral neck system (FNS), and percutaneous compression plate (PCCP) to determine which offers superior stability for unstable femoral neck fractures.

Materials and methods: Finite element analysis and artificial bone models were used to establish Pauwels III femoral neck fracture models. They were divided into ICCS, FNS, and PCCP groups based on respective internal fixation assemblies. The models were subjected to vertical axial loads (2100 N) and torsional forces (10 N × mm) along the femoral neck axis in the finite element analysis. The primary outcomes such as the Z axis fragmentary displacements, as well as displacements and the von Mises stress (VMS) distributions of internal fixations, were analyzed. Additionally, the artificial bones were subjected to progressively increasing vertical axial pressures and torsional moments at angles of 2°, 4°, and 6°, respectively. The vertical displacements of femoral heads and the required torque values were recorded.

Results: Finite element analysis revealed that under single-leg stance loading, the maximum Z-axis fragmentary displacements were 5.060 mm for ICCS, 4.028 mm for FNS, and 2.796 mm for PCCP. The maximum displacements of internal fixations were 4.545 mm for ICCS, 3.047 mm for FNS, and 2.559 mm for PCCP. Peak VMS values were 512.21 MPa for ICCS, 242.86 MPa for FNS, and 413.85 MPa for PCCP. Under increasing vertical loads applied to the artificial bones, the average vertical axial stiffness for the ICCS, FNS, and PCCP groups were 244.86 ± 2.84 N/mm, 415.03 ± 27.10 N/mm, and 529.98 ± 23.08 N/mm. For the torsional moment tests, the PCCP group demonstrated significantly higher torque values at 2°, 4°, and 6° compared with FNS and ICCS, with no significant difference between FNS and ICCS (P > 0.05).

Conclusions: Finite element analysis and artificial bone models indicated that PCCP offers the best compressive and rotational stability for fixing Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures, followed by FNS and then ICCS. No significant difference in rotational resistance was observed between FNS and ICCS in synthetic bones. Level of Evidence Level 5.

背景:保韦尔斯III型股骨颈骨折的最佳治疗方法仍有争议。我们的目的是比较三种倒置空心加压螺钉(ICCS)、股骨颈系统(FNS)和经皮加压钢板(PCCP)的生物力学性能,以确定哪种方法对不稳定股骨颈骨折具有更好的稳定性。材料与方法:采用有限元分析和人工骨模型建立Pauwels III型股骨颈骨折模型。根据各自的内固定组件分为ICCS、FNS和PCCP组。在有限元分析中,模型承受了沿股骨颈轴的垂直轴向载荷(2100 N)和扭转力(10 N × mm)。分析了Z轴碎片位移、内固定体位移和von Mises应力(VMS)分布等主要结果。此外,人工骨分别承受逐渐增加的垂直轴向压力和角度为2°、4°和6°的扭转力矩。记录股骨头垂直位移和所需扭矩值。结果:有限元分析显示,在单腿站立载荷下,ICCS、FNS和PCCP的最大z轴碎片位移分别为5.060 mm、4.028 mm和2.796 mm。ICCS内固定最大位移为4.545 mm, FNS为3.047 mm, PCCP为2.559 mm。ICCS的峰值VMS值为512.21 MPa, FNS为242.86 MPa, PCCP为413.85 MPa。随着人工骨垂直载荷的增加,ICCS、FNS和PCCP组的平均垂直轴向刚度分别为244.86±2.84 N/mm、415.03±27.10 N/mm和529.98±23.08 N/mm。在扭转力矩测试中,PCCP组在2°、4°和6°的扭矩值明显高于FNS和ICCS,而FNS和ICCS之间无显著差异(P < 0.05)。结论:有限元分析和人工骨模型显示PCCP在固定Pauwels III型股骨颈骨折时具有最佳的压缩和旋转稳定性,其次是FNS,最后是ICCS。FNS与ICCS在人工骨中的旋转阻力无显著差异。证据等级5级。
{"title":"Biomechanical evaluation of percutaneous compression plate and femoral neck system in Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures.","authors":"Xiaoping Xie, Songqi Bi, Qingxu Song, Qiong Zhang, Zhixing Yan, Xiaoyang Zhou, Tiecheng Yu","doi":"10.1186/s10195-024-00792-0","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s10195-024-00792-0","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The optimal treatment for Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures remains contentious. We aim to compare the biomechanical properties of three inverted cannulated compression screw (ICCS), femoral neck system (FNS), and percutaneous compression plate (PCCP) to determine which offers superior stability for unstable femoral neck fractures.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Finite element analysis and artificial bone models were used to establish Pauwels III femoral neck fracture models. They were divided into ICCS, FNS, and PCCP groups based on respective internal fixation assemblies. The models were subjected to vertical axial loads (2100 N) and torsional forces (10 N × mm) along the femoral neck axis in the finite element analysis. The primary outcomes such as the Z axis fragmentary displacements, as well as displacements and the von Mises stress (VMS) distributions of internal fixations, were analyzed. Additionally, the artificial bones were subjected to progressively increasing vertical axial pressures and torsional moments at angles of 2°, 4°, and 6°, respectively. The vertical displacements of femoral heads and the required torque values were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Finite element analysis revealed that under single-leg stance loading, the maximum Z-axis fragmentary displacements were 5.060 mm for ICCS, 4.028 mm for FNS, and 2.796 mm for PCCP. The maximum displacements of internal fixations were 4.545 mm for ICCS, 3.047 mm for FNS, and 2.559 mm for PCCP. Peak VMS values were 512.21 MPa for ICCS, 242.86 MPa for FNS, and 413.85 MPa for PCCP. Under increasing vertical loads applied to the artificial bones, the average vertical axial stiffness for the ICCS, FNS, and PCCP groups were 244.86 ± 2.84 N/mm, 415.03 ± 27.10 N/mm, and 529.98 ± 23.08 N/mm. For the torsional moment tests, the PCCP group demonstrated significantly higher torque values at 2°, 4°, and 6° compared with FNS and ICCS, with no significant difference between FNS and ICCS (P > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Finite element analysis and artificial bone models indicated that PCCP offers the best compressive and rotational stability for fixing Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures, followed by FNS and then ICCS. No significant difference in rotational resistance was observed between FNS and ICCS in synthetic bones. Level of Evidence Level 5.</p>","PeriodicalId":48603,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology","volume":"25 1","pages":"61"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11607197/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142755369","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The international Hip Outcome Tool 12 questionnaire (iHOT-12): an Italian language cross-cultural adaptation and validation. 国际髋关节成果工具 12 问卷 (iHOT-12):意大利语跨文化改编和验证。
IF 3 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2024-11-27 DOI: 10.1186/s10195-024-00796-w
Filippo Randelli, Alberto Fioruzzi, Alice Clemente, Alessandra Radaelli, Alessandra Menon, Danilo Di Via, Clemente Caria, Manuel Giovanni Mazzoleni, Claudio Buono, Paolo Di Benedetto, Michele Paciotti, Rocco Papalia, Gennaro Fiorentino, Marco Collarile, Manlio Panasci, Christian Carulli, Marco Rosolani, Federico Della Rocca, Simona Cerulli, Domenico Potestio, Michele Conati, Alberto Costantini, Gian Nicola Bisciotti, Alessandro Aprato, Loris Perticarini, Nicola Santori, Mattia Loppini, Giuseppe Solarino, Giovanni Vicenti, Vito Pavone, Alberto Di Martino, Fabrizio Rivera

Background: Patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures are essential for evaluating disease-related quality of life. The International Hip Outcome Tool 12 (iHOT12) assesses various aspects of hip-related symptoms, function, sports participation, and social limitations. This study aimed to adapt and validate an Italian version of the iHOT12 according to COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) guidelines.

Materials and methods: A multicenter observational cohort study was conducted to translate and validate the iHOT-12 into Italian (iHOT-12-ita) and assess its psychometric properties. Following international guidelines, we translated and culturally adapted the iHOT-12-ita. Patients with hip pain included in the study completed the iHOT-12-ita and mHHS-ita questionnaires at three timepoints: initial consultation (T0), 10-20 days later (T1), and at least 2 months after treatment (T2): hip injection, hip arthroscopy or total hip replacement. The evaluation of the iHOT-12-ita psychometric properties was conducted following the COSMIN checklist, assessing its reliability, responsiveness, interpretability, and acceptability.

Results: Between May 2019 to September 2022, 104 patients were included, from two tertiary hip surgery referral center clinics, they completed both questionnaires and were available for data analysis. The psychometric evaluations revealed robust test-retest reliability on 27 patients at T1, with a Lin coefficient of 0.709 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.553-0.888] and a high Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.745. At T2 after treatment, there was significant responsiveness (p < 0.001, n = 72), with excellent correlation observed between the iHOT-12-Ita and mHHS-Ita questionnaires (pwcorr = 0.7971). All predefined hypotheses were confirmed.

Conclusions: The Italian iHOT-12-ita proved reliable, valid, and responsive in assessing hip disease-related quality of life. Its implementation in routine clinical practice and research can enhance patient care and research quality in hip preservation surgery for the Italian orthopedic community.

Level of evidence: II.

背景:患者报告结果 (PRO) 测量对于评估与疾病相关的生活质量至关重要。国际髋关节结果工具 12 (iHOT12) 可评估髋关节相关症状、功能、运动参与和社会限制等各个方面。本研究旨在根据基于共识的健康测量工具选择标准(COSMIN)指南,改编并验证意大利版的 iHOT12:我们开展了一项多中心观察性队列研究,将 iHOT-12 翻译成意大利语并进行验证(iHOT-12-ita),同时评估其心理测量特性。根据国际指南,我们对 iHOT-12-ita 进行了翻译和文化适应性调整。参与研究的髋关节疼痛患者在三个时间点填写了 iHOT-12-ita 和 mHHS-ita 问卷:初诊(T0)、10-20 天后(T1)和治疗后至少 2 个月(T2):髋关节注射、髋关节镜检查或全髋关节置换术。按照COSMIN检查表对iHOT-12-ita的心理测量特性进行评估,评估其可靠性、响应性、可解释性和可接受性:2019年5月至2022年9月期间,两个三级髋关节手术转诊中心诊所共纳入104名患者,他们完成了两份问卷并可进行数据分析。心理测量学评估显示,在T1阶段,27名患者的测试-再测可靠性很高,林系数为0.709[95%置信区间(CI)为0.553-0.888],皮尔逊相关系数高达0.745。在治疗后的 T2 阶段,患者的反应明显(p 结论):事实证明,意大利 iHOT-12-ita 在评估与髋关节疾病相关的生活质量方面可靠、有效且反应灵敏。将其应用于常规临床实践和研究可提高意大利骨科界对患者的护理和髋关节保留手术的研究质量:证据等级:II。
{"title":"The international Hip Outcome Tool 12 questionnaire (iHOT-12): an Italian language cross-cultural adaptation and validation.","authors":"Filippo Randelli, Alberto Fioruzzi, Alice Clemente, Alessandra Radaelli, Alessandra Menon, Danilo Di Via, Clemente Caria, Manuel Giovanni Mazzoleni, Claudio Buono, Paolo Di Benedetto, Michele Paciotti, Rocco Papalia, Gennaro Fiorentino, Marco Collarile, Manlio Panasci, Christian Carulli, Marco Rosolani, Federico Della Rocca, Simona Cerulli, Domenico Potestio, Michele Conati, Alberto Costantini, Gian Nicola Bisciotti, Alessandro Aprato, Loris Perticarini, Nicola Santori, Mattia Loppini, Giuseppe Solarino, Giovanni Vicenti, Vito Pavone, Alberto Di Martino, Fabrizio Rivera","doi":"10.1186/s10195-024-00796-w","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s10195-024-00796-w","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures are essential for evaluating disease-related quality of life. The International Hip Outcome Tool 12 (iHOT12) assesses various aspects of hip-related symptoms, function, sports participation, and social limitations. This study aimed to adapt and validate an Italian version of the iHOT12 according to COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) guidelines.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A multicenter observational cohort study was conducted to translate and validate the iHOT-12 into Italian (iHOT-12-ita) and assess its psychometric properties. Following international guidelines, we translated and culturally adapted the iHOT-12-ita. Patients with hip pain included in the study completed the iHOT-12-ita and mHHS-ita questionnaires at three timepoints: initial consultation (T0), 10-20 days later (T1), and at least 2 months after treatment (T2): hip injection, hip arthroscopy or total hip replacement. The evaluation of the iHOT-12-ita psychometric properties was conducted following the COSMIN checklist, assessing its reliability, responsiveness, interpretability, and acceptability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between May 2019 to September 2022, 104 patients were included, from two tertiary hip surgery referral center clinics, they completed both questionnaires and were available for data analysis. The psychometric evaluations revealed robust test-retest reliability on 27 patients at T1, with a Lin coefficient of 0.709 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.553-0.888] and a high Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.745. At T2 after treatment, there was significant responsiveness (p < 0.001, n = 72), with excellent correlation observed between the iHOT-12-Ita and mHHS-Ita questionnaires (pwcorr = 0.7971). All predefined hypotheses were confirmed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Italian iHOT-12-ita proved reliable, valid, and responsive in assessing hip disease-related quality of life. Its implementation in routine clinical practice and research can enhance patient care and research quality in hip preservation surgery for the Italian orthopedic community.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>II.</p>","PeriodicalId":48603,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology","volume":"25 1","pages":"59"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11602895/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142740536","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1