Pub Date : 2024-12-20DOI: 10.1186/s10195-024-00808-9
Gian Andrea Lucidi, Luca Solaro, Alberto Grassi, Mohammad Ibrahim Alhalalmeh, Stefano Ratti, Lucia Manzoli, Stefano Zaffagnini
The medial collateral ligament (MCL) is by far the most commonly injured ligament of the knee. The medial ligament complex covers a broad bony surface on the extraarticular portion of the femur and is highly vascularized, which allows for a high healing potential. For this reason, most MCL complex lesions were treated conservatively in the past. However, recent advancements regarding the MCL anatomy and kinematics highlighted the complex biomechanical behavior of the isolated and combined MCL lesion, and it is now fully appreciated that some MCL lesions warrant surgical treatment. The present review aims to provide the reader with an overview of the new evidence and advancement on the complex anatomy, biomechanics, and treatment of the MCL.
{"title":"Current trends in the medial side of the knee: not only medial collateral ligament (MCL).","authors":"Gian Andrea Lucidi, Luca Solaro, Alberto Grassi, Mohammad Ibrahim Alhalalmeh, Stefano Ratti, Lucia Manzoli, Stefano Zaffagnini","doi":"10.1186/s10195-024-00808-9","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s10195-024-00808-9","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The medial collateral ligament (MCL) is by far the most commonly injured ligament of the knee. The medial ligament complex covers a broad bony surface on the extraarticular portion of the femur and is highly vascularized, which allows for a high healing potential. For this reason, most MCL complex lesions were treated conservatively in the past. However, recent advancements regarding the MCL anatomy and kinematics highlighted the complex biomechanical behavior of the isolated and combined MCL lesion, and it is now fully appreciated that some MCL lesions warrant surgical treatment. The present review aims to provide the reader with an overview of the new evidence and advancement on the complex anatomy, biomechanics, and treatment of the MCL.</p>","PeriodicalId":48603,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology","volume":"25 1","pages":"69"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11662134/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142865917","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-19DOI: 10.1186/s10195-024-00806-x
Davide Stimolo, Maximilian Budin, Domenico De Mauro, Eduardo Suero, Thorsten Gehrke, Mustafa Citak
Background: Patients affected by chronic kidney disease (CKD) are at increased risk of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) after total hip arthroplasty (THA). This patient population has a higher risk of recurrent infections and hospitalization. The aim of this study is to compare the profile of microorganisms in patients with CKD and PJI of the hip versus controls and to individuate potentially unusual and drug-resistant microorganisms among the causative bacteria.
Materials and methods: A total of 4261 patients affected by PJI of the hip were retrospectively studied. Patients affected by CKD in this population were identified and compared with a control group of patients with PJI but without CKD. Data on patient characteristics and comorbidities were collected. The microorganisms responsible for PJI were identified and compared between both groups.
Results: The CKD group included 409 patients, 54.3% male, mean age of 73.8 ± 8.9 years, a higher body mass index (BMI) than the general population (29.88 ± 5.90 kg/m2), and higher age-adjusted CCI of 6.15 ± 2.35. Overall, 70 different isolates of microorganisms were identified, including 52 Gram-positive spp., 28 Gram-negative spp., 3 fungi, and 1 mycobacterium. Polymicrobial infections were more common in CKD group than controls (47.9% versus 30.9%; p < 0.0001). Staphylococcus spp. were the most common bacteria in both groups, followed by Gram-negative Enterobacteriaceae and Streptococcus spp. CKD group showed a higher risk of developing infections caused by Staphylococcus aureus (p = 0.003), Gram-negative bacteria, and Candida (p = 0.035).
Conclusions: Renal failure exposes patients who undergo THA to PJI caused by microorganisms that are potentially more drug resistant, leading to a higher risk of treatment failure. Knowing in advance the different microorganism profiles could help to plan a different surgical strategy.
{"title":"Differences in microorganism profile in periprosthetic joint infections of the hip in patients affected by chronic kidney disease.","authors":"Davide Stimolo, Maximilian Budin, Domenico De Mauro, Eduardo Suero, Thorsten Gehrke, Mustafa Citak","doi":"10.1186/s10195-024-00806-x","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s10195-024-00806-x","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients affected by chronic kidney disease (CKD) are at increased risk of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) after total hip arthroplasty (THA). This patient population has a higher risk of recurrent infections and hospitalization. The aim of this study is to compare the profile of microorganisms in patients with CKD and PJI of the hip versus controls and to individuate potentially unusual and drug-resistant microorganisms among the causative bacteria.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 4261 patients affected by PJI of the hip were retrospectively studied. Patients affected by CKD in this population were identified and compared with a control group of patients with PJI but without CKD. Data on patient characteristics and comorbidities were collected. The microorganisms responsible for PJI were identified and compared between both groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The CKD group included 409 patients, 54.3% male, mean age of 73.8 ± 8.9 years, a higher body mass index (BMI) than the general population (29.88 ± 5.90 kg/m<sup>2</sup>), and higher age-adjusted CCI of 6.15 ± 2.35. Overall, 70 different isolates of microorganisms were identified, including 52 Gram-positive spp., 28 Gram-negative spp., 3 fungi, and 1 mycobacterium. Polymicrobial infections were more common in CKD group than controls (47.9% versus 30.9%; p < 0.0001). Staphylococcus spp. were the most common bacteria in both groups, followed by Gram-negative Enterobacteriaceae and Streptococcus spp. CKD group showed a higher risk of developing infections caused by Staphylococcus aureus (p = 0.003), Gram-negative bacteria, and Candida (p = 0.035).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Renal failure exposes patients who undergo THA to PJI caused by microorganisms that are potentially more drug resistant, leading to a higher risk of treatment failure. Knowing in advance the different microorganism profiles could help to plan a different surgical strategy.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence iii: </strong></p>","PeriodicalId":48603,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology","volume":"25 1","pages":"67"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11659542/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142865918","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-18DOI: 10.1186/s10195-024-00799-7
Giovanni Sergio Utrilla, Irene Roman Degano, Riccardo D'Ambrosi
Purpose: This study's primary objective was to evaluate the effectiveness of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) administration for meniscal injuries treated with meniscal repair procedures (sutures), using radiologic measures and clinical scales. The secondary objective was to identify potential bias-inducing elements in the analyzed studies.
Methods: In December 2023, a systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, and Scopus for randomized controlled trials. This review compares PRP with placebo. Three studies were finally selected. The risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane's Risk of Bias Tool 2. Radiologic evaluation of meniscal healing was measured with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and arthroscopic studies, while clinical evaluation was performed using four scales [Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), visual analog scale (VAS), International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form (IKDC), and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Index (WOMAC)] and by recording the incidence of complications.
Results: The three selected studies included 139 patients; of these, 76 (54.7%) were randomly assigned to the intervention group (PRP injection) and 63 (45.3%) to the control group (placebo). The mean age of the intervention group was 37.4 ± 7.5 years, while the mean age of the control group was 36.5 ± 9.2 years. There were 41 female patients (29.5%). The median follow-up duration was 27.58 ± 17.3 months. MRI evaluation did not show a significant improvement in the PRP group in any of the studies (p-value = 0.41-0.54). However, when assessed by the cumulative evaluation of MRI and arthroscopy, the cumulative failure rate was significantly better in the PRP group (p-value = 0.04-0.048). One study that evaluated isolated arthroscopy also showed significant improvement in the PRP group (p = 0.003). Regarding the VAS scale, no study demonstrated a significant difference, except for one study that showed significant improvement after 6 months and in the difference between the 3rd and 6th months. The KOOS scale yielded conflicting results; one study showed no significant difference, while the other two indicated significant improvement. The IKDC and WOMAC scales were evaluated in two studies, showing opposite results. All included studies reported no complications, and one study indicated no increased risk in the treatment group.
Conclusions: The results of this review indicate the necessity for further studies to make a definitive statement about the effectiveness of PRP administration in meniscal repair processes. Level of evidence Systematic review and meta-analysis of articles of level 1.
目的:本研究的主要目的是评估富血小板血浆(PRP)给药对半月板修复手术(缝合)治疗半月板损伤的有效性,采用放射学测量和临床量表。次要目的是在分析的研究中确定潜在的偏倚诱发因素。方法:2023年12月,系统检索PubMed、Cochrane、Embase和Scopus中随机对照试验。本综述比较了PRP和安慰剂。最终选择了三个研究。使用Cochrane's risk of bias Tool 2评估偏倚风险。通过磁共振成像(MRI)和关节镜检查对半月板愈合进行放射学评估,而临床评估采用四种量表[膝关节损伤和骨关节炎结局评分(oos)、视觉模拟评分(VAS)、国际膝关节文献委员会主观膝关节形态(IKDC)和西安大略省和麦克马斯特大学指数(WOMAC)]并记录并发症发生率。结果:3项入选研究纳入139例患者;其中,76人(54.7%)被随机分配到干预组(PRP注射),63人(45.3%)被随机分配到对照组(安慰剂)。干预组平均年龄37.4±7.5岁,对照组平均年龄36.5±9.2岁。女性41例(29.5%)。中位随访时间为27.58±17.3个月。在所有研究中,MRI评估均未显示PRP组有显著改善(p值= 0.41-0.54)。然而,当通过MRI和关节镜的累积评估评估时,PRP组的累积失败率明显更好(p值= 0.04-0.048)。一项评估孤立关节镜的研究也显示PRP组有显著改善(p = 0.003)。在VAS量表上,除了有一项研究在6个月后以及第3个月和第6个月的差异中显示有显著改善外,没有研究显示有显著差异。oos量表得出的结果相互矛盾;一项研究显示没有显著差异,而另外两项研究显示显著改善。两项研究对IKDC和WOMAC量表进行了评估,结果相反。所有纳入的研究均未报告并发症,其中一项研究表明治疗组的风险没有增加。结论:本综述的结果表明需要进一步的研究来明确PRP在半月板修复过程中的有效性。证据水平1级文献的系统评价和荟萃分析。
{"title":"Efficacy of platelet-rich plasma in meniscal repair surgery: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.","authors":"Giovanni Sergio Utrilla, Irene Roman Degano, Riccardo D'Ambrosi","doi":"10.1186/s10195-024-00799-7","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s10195-024-00799-7","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study's primary objective was to evaluate the effectiveness of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) administration for meniscal injuries treated with meniscal repair procedures (sutures), using radiologic measures and clinical scales. The secondary objective was to identify potential bias-inducing elements in the analyzed studies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In December 2023, a systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, and Scopus for randomized controlled trials. This review compares PRP with placebo. Three studies were finally selected. The risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane's Risk of Bias Tool 2. Radiologic evaluation of meniscal healing was measured with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and arthroscopic studies, while clinical evaluation was performed using four scales [Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), visual analog scale (VAS), International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form (IKDC), and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Index (WOMAC)] and by recording the incidence of complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The three selected studies included 139 patients; of these, 76 (54.7%) were randomly assigned to the intervention group (PRP injection) and 63 (45.3%) to the control group (placebo). The mean age of the intervention group was 37.4 ± 7.5 years, while the mean age of the control group was 36.5 ± 9.2 years. There were 41 female patients (29.5%). The median follow-up duration was 27.58 ± 17.3 months. MRI evaluation did not show a significant improvement in the PRP group in any of the studies (p-value = 0.41-0.54). However, when assessed by the cumulative evaluation of MRI and arthroscopy, the cumulative failure rate was significantly better in the PRP group (p-value = 0.04-0.048). One study that evaluated isolated arthroscopy also showed significant improvement in the PRP group (p = 0.003). Regarding the VAS scale, no study demonstrated a significant difference, except for one study that showed significant improvement after 6 months and in the difference between the 3rd and 6th months. The KOOS scale yielded conflicting results; one study showed no significant difference, while the other two indicated significant improvement. The IKDC and WOMAC scales were evaluated in two studies, showing opposite results. All included studies reported no complications, and one study indicated no increased risk in the treatment group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results of this review indicate the necessity for further studies to make a definitive statement about the effectiveness of PRP administration in meniscal repair processes. Level of evidence Systematic review and meta-analysis of articles of level 1.</p>","PeriodicalId":48603,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology","volume":"25 1","pages":"63"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11656006/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142855881","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-18DOI: 10.1186/s10195-024-00801-2
Xiao-Feng Zhang, Pan Liu, Jun-Wu Huang, Yao-Hua He
Background: Quadriceps tendon (QT), bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB), and hamstring tendon (HT) autografts are widely used for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), but the optimal autograft choice remains controversial. This study assessed the treatment effects of QT versus BPTB and HT autografts for ACLR.
Methods: The PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched for eligible studies published from inception until July 2022. Effect estimates were presented as odds ratios (OR) and weighted mean differences (WMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for categorical and continuous variables, respectively. All pooled analyses were performed using a random-effects model.
Results: Twenty-one studies (3 randomized controlled trials [RCTs], 3 prospective studies, and 15 retrospective studies) involving 2964 patients with ACLR were selected for meta-analysis. Compared with the HT autograft, the QT autograft was associated with a reduced risk of graft failure (OR: 0.46; 95% CI: 0.23-0.93; P = 0.031). Compared with the BPTB autograft, the QT autograft was associated with a reduced risk of donor site pain (OR: 0.16; 95% CI: 0.10-0.24; P < 0.001). Moreover, the QT autograft was associated with a lower side-to-side difference than that observed with the HT autograft (WMD: - 0.74; 95% CI: - 1.47 to - 0.01; P = 0.048). Finally, compared with the BPTB autograft, the QT autograft was associated with a reduced risk of moderate-to-severe kneecap symptoms during sports and work activities (OR: 0.14; 95% CI: 0.05-0.37; P < 0.001).
Conclusions: The findings of this study suggest that the QT autograft can be defined as a safe and effective alternative choice for ACLR, but its superiority is yet to be proven by RCTs and prospective studies. Level of evidence Level III.
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of quadriceps tendon autograft versus bone-patellar tendon-bone and hamstring tendon autografts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Xiao-Feng Zhang, Pan Liu, Jun-Wu Huang, Yao-Hua He","doi":"10.1186/s10195-024-00801-2","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s10195-024-00801-2","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Quadriceps tendon (QT), bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB), and hamstring tendon (HT) autografts are widely used for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), but the optimal autograft choice remains controversial. This study assessed the treatment effects of QT versus BPTB and HT autografts for ACLR.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched for eligible studies published from inception until July 2022. Effect estimates were presented as odds ratios (OR) and weighted mean differences (WMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for categorical and continuous variables, respectively. All pooled analyses were performed using a random-effects model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-one studies (3 randomized controlled trials [RCTs], 3 prospective studies, and 15 retrospective studies) involving 2964 patients with ACLR were selected for meta-analysis. Compared with the HT autograft, the QT autograft was associated with a reduced risk of graft failure (OR: 0.46; 95% CI: 0.23-0.93; P = 0.031). Compared with the BPTB autograft, the QT autograft was associated with a reduced risk of donor site pain (OR: 0.16; 95% CI: 0.10-0.24; P < 0.001). Moreover, the QT autograft was associated with a lower side-to-side difference than that observed with the HT autograft (WMD: - 0.74; 95% CI: - 1.47 to - 0.01; P = 0.048). Finally, compared with the BPTB autograft, the QT autograft was associated with a reduced risk of moderate-to-severe kneecap symptoms during sports and work activities (OR: 0.14; 95% CI: 0.05-0.37; P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings of this study suggest that the QT autograft can be defined as a safe and effective alternative choice for ACLR, but its superiority is yet to be proven by RCTs and prospective studies. Level of evidence Level III.</p>","PeriodicalId":48603,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology","volume":"25 1","pages":"65"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11656020/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142855750","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-18DOI: 10.1186/s10195-024-00812-z
Cesare Faldini, Francesco Traina, Federico Pilla, Claudio D'Agostino, Matteo Brunello, Manuele Morandi Guaitoli, Alberto Di Martino
Total hip arthroplasty (THA) has significantly improved the lives of patients with degenerative hip disorders. The direct anterior approach (DAA) is favored for its minimally invasive nature, leading to less postoperative pain and a faster recovery. The bikini incision (BI) approach was developed to enhance aesthetic outcomes while maintaining the clinical and functional benefits of the DAA. Despite its advantages, the BI technique presents challenges, controversies persist regarding its efficacy and safety, and there is no consensus within the medical community about its overall benefits. Incisions aligned with Langer's lines, like the BI, promote better healing and minimal scarring. Studies indicate that BI patients report higher satisfaction with scar appearance and texture compared to traditional DAA patients. However, the BI carries a higher risk of lateral femoral cutaneous nerve (LFCN) injury, although most symptoms resolve within 6 months. For obese patients, the BI is associated with fewer complications, such as infections and delayed healing, compared to the conventional DAA, making it a safe and effective option. BI patients also experience better aesthetic outcomes and functional recovery, with reduced pain and itching. The BI technique in THA represents a significant advancement, offering improved aesthetic and wound-healing outcomes. The shift from the traditional DAA to the BI aligns with patient preferences for scars that are less visible and conspicuous. Despite the steep learning curve and risks, careful patient selection and refined surgical techniques can enhance the BI's benefits. Future research should focus on long-term outcomes and comparative studies to further establish the BI's efficacy and safety. As patient demand for aesthetically favorable surgeries grows, the BI is likely to become a preferred approach in THA.
{"title":"For many but not for all: the bikini incision direct anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty. A narrative review.","authors":"Cesare Faldini, Francesco Traina, Federico Pilla, Claudio D'Agostino, Matteo Brunello, Manuele Morandi Guaitoli, Alberto Di Martino","doi":"10.1186/s10195-024-00812-z","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s10195-024-00812-z","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Total hip arthroplasty (THA) has significantly improved the lives of patients with degenerative hip disorders. The direct anterior approach (DAA) is favored for its minimally invasive nature, leading to less postoperative pain and a faster recovery. The bikini incision (BI) approach was developed to enhance aesthetic outcomes while maintaining the clinical and functional benefits of the DAA. Despite its advantages, the BI technique presents challenges, controversies persist regarding its efficacy and safety, and there is no consensus within the medical community about its overall benefits. Incisions aligned with Langer's lines, like the BI, promote better healing and minimal scarring. Studies indicate that BI patients report higher satisfaction with scar appearance and texture compared to traditional DAA patients. However, the BI carries a higher risk of lateral femoral cutaneous nerve (LFCN) injury, although most symptoms resolve within 6 months. For obese patients, the BI is associated with fewer complications, such as infections and delayed healing, compared to the conventional DAA, making it a safe and effective option. BI patients also experience better aesthetic outcomes and functional recovery, with reduced pain and itching. The BI technique in THA represents a significant advancement, offering improved aesthetic and wound-healing outcomes. The shift from the traditional DAA to the BI aligns with patient preferences for scars that are less visible and conspicuous. Despite the steep learning curve and risks, careful patient selection and refined surgical techniques can enhance the BI's benefits. Future research should focus on long-term outcomes and comparative studies to further establish the BI's efficacy and safety. As patient demand for aesthetically favorable surgeries grows, the BI is likely to become a preferred approach in THA.</p>","PeriodicalId":48603,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology","volume":"25 1","pages":"66"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11655770/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142855827","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Postoperative femoral head cartilage injury (FHCI) is a rare condition that can be observed in a certain proportion of patients undergoing hip arthroscopy. However, the prevalence and associated factors of FHCI, and the effect of this condition on clinical outcomes still remain unknown.
Patients and methods: Consecutive patients who were diagnosed with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) and labral tear and underwent hip arthroscopic treatment in our institute between July 2020 and July 2021 were retrospectively evaluated. Supine anteroposterior hip radiographs, cross-table lateral radiographs, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and computed tomography (CT) were obtained preoperatively. Postoperative MRI, at least 6 months after arthroscopy, was performed. Postoperative FHCI was evaluated by two surgeons through MRI. Preoperative patient-reported outcomes (PROs) including visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, and modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) before surgery and at final followup were obtained.
Results: A total of 196 patients were included. Postoperative FHCI was identified in 21 (10.7%) patients. The intraobserver reliability of the observer A and B for detecting postoperative FHCI using 3.0-T MRI was high (k = 0.929, and k = 0.947, respectively). The interobserver reliability between the two observers for detecting FHCI using 3.0-T MRI was high (k = 0.919). There was no significant difference in preoperative and postoperative mHHS, VAS, and percentage of patients who surpassed minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and achieved patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) between patients with and without postoperative FHCI (P > 0.05).
Conclusion: Although postoperative FHCI was observed in 10.7% of patients, which was associated with larger labrum, this condition did not result in inferior clinical outcomes. Level of evidence IV, retrospective case series. Trial registration The Chinese Clinical Trial Registry approved the registration (ChiCTR2200061166). The date of registration is 2022-06-15.
背景:术后股骨头软骨损伤(FHCI)是一种罕见的情况,在一定比例的髋关节镜患者中可以观察到。然而,FHCI的患病率和相关因素,以及这种情况对临床结果的影响仍然未知。患者和方法:回顾性评估2020年7月至2021年7月在我院连续诊断为股髋臼撞击综合征(FAIS)和唇部撕裂并接受髋关节镜治疗的患者。术前进行仰卧位髋关节正位片、跨台侧位片、磁共振成像(MRI)和计算机断层扫描(CT)。术后至少在关节镜检查后6个月进行MRI。术后FHCI由两名外科医生通过MRI评估。术前患者报告的结果(PROs)包括术前和最终随访时疼痛的视觉模拟评分(VAS)和改良Harris髋关节评分(mHHS)。结果:共纳入196例患者。术后21例(10.7%)患者发现FHCI。3.0 t MRI检测术后FHCI时,观察者A和观察者B的观察者内信度较高(k = 0.929, k = 0.947)。3.0 t MRI检测FHCI的观察者间信度较高(k = 0.919)。术后无FHCI患者术前术后mHHS、VAS、超过最小临床重要差异(MCID)及达到患者可接受症状状态(PASS)的患者比例差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。结论:虽然10.7%的患者术后出现FHCI,且伴有较大的阴唇,但这种情况并不会导致较差的临床结果。证据水平IV,回顾性病例系列。中国临床试验注册中心批准注册(ChiCTR2200061166)。注册日期为2022-06-15。
{"title":"Postoperative femoral head cartilage injury after hip arthroscopic treatment for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome and labral tear.","authors":"Guanying Gao, Yichuan Zhu, Siqi Zhang, Yingfang Ao, Jianquan Wang, Yan Xu","doi":"10.1186/s10195-024-00811-0","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s10195-024-00811-0","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Postoperative femoral head cartilage injury (FHCI) is a rare condition that can be observed in a certain proportion of patients undergoing hip arthroscopy. However, the prevalence and associated factors of FHCI, and the effect of this condition on clinical outcomes still remain unknown.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Consecutive patients who were diagnosed with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) and labral tear and underwent hip arthroscopic treatment in our institute between July 2020 and July 2021 were retrospectively evaluated. Supine anteroposterior hip radiographs, cross-table lateral radiographs, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and computed tomography (CT) were obtained preoperatively. Postoperative MRI, at least 6 months after arthroscopy, was performed. Postoperative FHCI was evaluated by two surgeons through MRI. Preoperative patient-reported outcomes (PROs) including visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, and modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) before surgery and at final followup were obtained.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 196 patients were included. Postoperative FHCI was identified in 21 (10.7%) patients. The intraobserver reliability of the observer A and B for detecting postoperative FHCI using 3.0-T MRI was high (k = 0.929, and k = 0.947, respectively). The interobserver reliability between the two observers for detecting FHCI using 3.0-T MRI was high (k = 0.919). There was no significant difference in preoperative and postoperative mHHS, VAS, and percentage of patients who surpassed minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and achieved patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) between patients with and without postoperative FHCI (P > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although postoperative FHCI was observed in 10.7% of patients, which was associated with larger labrum, this condition did not result in inferior clinical outcomes. Level of evidence IV, retrospective case series. Trial registration The Chinese Clinical Trial Registry approved the registration (ChiCTR2200061166). The date of registration is 2022-06-15.</p>","PeriodicalId":48603,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology","volume":"25 1","pages":"64"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11655738/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142856068","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Autologous minced cartilage is a method for cartilage defect repair, and our study focuses on a newly developed biphasic cylindrical osteochondral construct designed for use in human knees. We aimed to compare its clinical effectiveness and safety with microfracture, the commonly utilized reparative treatment for knee chondral or osteochondral defects.
Materials and methods: Conducted as a prospective multicenter, randomized controlled, non-inferiority trial across nine hospitals, the study involved 92 patients with International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) grade 3 to 4 chondral or osteochondral lesions on femoral condyles. Patients were evenly randomized to receive either the biphasic cartilage-repair implant (BiCRI) or microfracture. Functional outcomes and safety assessments were conducted at postoperative intervals of 6 weeks and 3, 6, and 12 months. Primary and secondary endpoints included International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) 2000 Subjective Knee Evaluation Form score improvement, the grade distribution in the IKDC 2000 Knee Examination Form, and various assessments, such as the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), visual analog scales (VASs) for pain, MRI findings, and arthroscopic findings at 12 months.
Results: Out of the initial participants, 47 in the BiCRI group and 45 in the microfracture group completed the follow-up. At 12 months, the mean change in IKDC total score was 25.56 ± 18.48 for BiCRI and 27.51 ± 23.65 for microfracture. The 95% confidence interval (CI) for the score difference (BiCRI minus microfracture) was - 6.95, exceeding the non-inferiority margin of - 12. Secondary endpoints indicated comparable functional outcomes, and arthroscopic findings demonstrated more fully regenerated cartilage in the BiCRI group.
Conclusion: Based on the IKDC 2000 Subjective Knee Evaluation Form score, BiCRI proved non-inferior to microfracture at 12 months. Short-term functional outcomes were comparable to those with microfracture, while arthroscopic findings showed more complete cartilage regeneration in the BiCRI group. Consequently, BiCRI emerges as a viable alternative for treating chondral or osteochondral defects.
Level of evidence: Level 2, multi-center, randomized clinical trial.
Trial registration: Name of the registry: ClinicalTrials.gov.
Trial registration number: NCT01477008. Date of registration: 11/14/2011. URL of trial registry record: clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT01477008.
{"title":"Biphasic cartilage repair implant versus microfracture in the treatment of focal chondral and osteochondral lesions of the knee: a prospective, multi-center, randomized clinical trial.","authors":"Tzu-Hao Tseng, Chao-Ping Chen, Ching-Chuan Jiang, Pei-Wei Weng, Yi-Sheng Chan, Horng-Chaung Hsu, Hongsen Chiang","doi":"10.1186/s10195-024-00802-1","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s10195-024-00802-1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Autologous minced cartilage is a method for cartilage defect repair, and our study focuses on a newly developed biphasic cylindrical osteochondral construct designed for use in human knees. We aimed to compare its clinical effectiveness and safety with microfracture, the commonly utilized reparative treatment for knee chondral or osteochondral defects.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Conducted as a prospective multicenter, randomized controlled, non-inferiority trial across nine hospitals, the study involved 92 patients with International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) grade 3 to 4 chondral or osteochondral lesions on femoral condyles. Patients were evenly randomized to receive either the biphasic cartilage-repair implant (BiCRI) or microfracture. Functional outcomes and safety assessments were conducted at postoperative intervals of 6 weeks and 3, 6, and 12 months. Primary and secondary endpoints included International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) 2000 Subjective Knee Evaluation Form score improvement, the grade distribution in the IKDC 2000 Knee Examination Form, and various assessments, such as the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), visual analog scales (VASs) for pain, MRI findings, and arthroscopic findings at 12 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of the initial participants, 47 in the BiCRI group and 45 in the microfracture group completed the follow-up. At 12 months, the mean change in IKDC total score was 25.56 ± 18.48 for BiCRI and 27.51 ± 23.65 for microfracture. The 95% confidence interval (CI) for the score difference (BiCRI minus microfracture) was - 6.95, exceeding the non-inferiority margin of - 12. Secondary endpoints indicated comparable functional outcomes, and arthroscopic findings demonstrated more fully regenerated cartilage in the BiCRI group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Based on the IKDC 2000 Subjective Knee Evaluation Form score, BiCRI proved non-inferior to microfracture at 12 months. Short-term functional outcomes were comparable to those with microfracture, while arthroscopic findings showed more complete cartilage regeneration in the BiCRI group. Consequently, BiCRI emerges as a viable alternative for treating chondral or osteochondral defects.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level 2, multi-center, randomized clinical trial.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Name of the registry: ClinicalTrials.gov.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>NCT01477008. Date of registration: 11/14/2011. URL of trial registry record: clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT01477008.</p>","PeriodicalId":48603,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology","volume":"25 1","pages":"62"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11608183/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142773833","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-29DOI: 10.1186/s10195-024-00793-z
WenTao Wang, QianQian Mei, Hang Liu, YueMing Guo, HaiBo Mei, Federico Canavese, Antonio Andreacchio, HanQing Lyu, ShunYou Chen, ShengHua He
Background: The risk factors for proximal radial abnormalities (PRA) in paediatric patients with untreated chronic Monteggia fractures (CMFs) are unclear. This multicentre study aimed to evaluate the risk factors for PRA in children with untreated CMFs.
Materials and methods: The clinical data of 142 patients (mean age at the time of injury: 5.73 years) with untreated unilateral CMFs were retrospectively reviewed. The radial neck-shaft angle (RNSAP) and radial head size (RHL) were measured on anteroposterior (AP) and lateral (L) radiographs, respectively. The RHL size was the ratio of the widest width of the proximal radial metaphysis to the narrowest radial neck width. The En-RNSAP and En-RHL were the ratios of the enlargement (En) of the RNSAP angle and RHL size of the injured elbow to those of the uninjured elbow, respectively. Paired-sample t-tests, single-factor analyses and multiple linear regression analyses were performed to evaluate the correlation between the differences in these parameters between the injured and uninjured elbows and the assessed risk factors. These risk factors included institution, sex, laterality, age at injury, time from injury to diagnosis, direction of RH dislocation, distance of RH dislocation (DD-RH), presence of radial or median nerve injury, heterotopic ossification and immobilization of the elbow after injury.
Results: In children with untreated CMFs (mean time from injury to diagnosis: 14.6 months), Student's t-test revealed a significant difference in the RHL size (P < 0.001) but not in the RNSAP angle (P = 0.075) between the injured and uninjured elbows. Pearson correlation analysis revealed a potential correlation between En-RHL and age at the time of injury (P = 0.069), time from injury to diagnosis (P < 0.001) and DD-RH (P < 0.001), excluding other risk factors (P > 0.05). Multiple linear regression analysis revealed that age at the time of injury (P = 0.047), time from injury to diagnosis (P = 0.007) and DD-RH (P = 0.001) were risk factors for an increased En-RHL in patients with untreated CMFs; the variability in En-RHL among the other three risk factors was 21.4%.
Conclusions: In paediatric patients with unilateral untreated CMFs, PRA of the injured elbow consisted mainly of RH enlargement or radial neck narrowing rather than valgus deformities of the proximal radius. Older age at injury, increased time from injury to diagnosis and DD-RH were risk factors for more severe PRA.
{"title":"Risk factors for proximal radial abnormalities in children with untreated chronic Monteggia fractures: a review of 142 cases.","authors":"WenTao Wang, QianQian Mei, Hang Liu, YueMing Guo, HaiBo Mei, Federico Canavese, Antonio Andreacchio, HanQing Lyu, ShunYou Chen, ShengHua He","doi":"10.1186/s10195-024-00793-z","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s10195-024-00793-z","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The risk factors for proximal radial abnormalities (PRA) in paediatric patients with untreated chronic Monteggia fractures (CMFs) are unclear. This multicentre study aimed to evaluate the risk factors for PRA in children with untreated CMFs.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The clinical data of 142 patients (mean age at the time of injury: 5.73 years) with untreated unilateral CMFs were retrospectively reviewed. The radial neck-shaft angle (RNS<sub>AP</sub>) and radial head size (RH<sub>L</sub>) were measured on anteroposterior (AP) and lateral (L) radiographs, respectively. The RH<sub>L</sub> size was the ratio of the widest width of the proximal radial metaphysis to the narrowest radial neck width. The En-RNS<sub>AP</sub> and En-RH<sub>L</sub> were the ratios of the enlargement (En) of the RNS<sub>AP</sub> angle and RH<sub>L</sub> size of the injured elbow to those of the uninjured elbow, respectively. Paired-sample t-tests, single-factor analyses and multiple linear regression analyses were performed to evaluate the correlation between the differences in these parameters between the injured and uninjured elbows and the assessed risk factors. These risk factors included institution, sex, laterality, age at injury, time from injury to diagnosis, direction of RH dislocation, distance of RH dislocation (DD-RH), presence of radial or median nerve injury, heterotopic ossification and immobilization of the elbow after injury.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In children with untreated CMFs (mean time from injury to diagnosis: 14.6 months), Student's t-test revealed a significant difference in the RH<sub>L</sub> size (P < 0.001) but not in the RNS<sub>AP</sub> angle (P = 0.075) between the injured and uninjured elbows. Pearson correlation analysis revealed a potential correlation between En-RH<sub>L</sub> and age at the time of injury (P = 0.069), time from injury to diagnosis (P < 0.001) and DD-RH (P < 0.001), excluding other risk factors (P > 0.05). Multiple linear regression analysis revealed that age at the time of injury (P = 0.047), time from injury to diagnosis (P = 0.007) and DD-RH (P = 0.001) were risk factors for an increased En-RH<sub>L</sub> in patients with untreated CMFs; the variability in En-RH<sub>L</sub> among the other three risk factors was 21.4%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In paediatric patients with unilateral untreated CMFs, PRA of the injured elbow consisted mainly of RH enlargement or radial neck narrowing rather than valgus deformities of the proximal radius. Older age at injury, increased time from injury to diagnosis and DD-RH were risk factors for more severe PRA.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>III.</p>","PeriodicalId":48603,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology","volume":"25 1","pages":"60"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11607283/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142755372","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: The optimal treatment for Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures remains contentious. We aim to compare the biomechanical properties of three inverted cannulated compression screw (ICCS), femoral neck system (FNS), and percutaneous compression plate (PCCP) to determine which offers superior stability for unstable femoral neck fractures.
Materials and methods: Finite element analysis and artificial bone models were used to establish Pauwels III femoral neck fracture models. They were divided into ICCS, FNS, and PCCP groups based on respective internal fixation assemblies. The models were subjected to vertical axial loads (2100 N) and torsional forces (10 N × mm) along the femoral neck axis in the finite element analysis. The primary outcomes such as the Z axis fragmentary displacements, as well as displacements and the von Mises stress (VMS) distributions of internal fixations, were analyzed. Additionally, the artificial bones were subjected to progressively increasing vertical axial pressures and torsional moments at angles of 2°, 4°, and 6°, respectively. The vertical displacements of femoral heads and the required torque values were recorded.
Results: Finite element analysis revealed that under single-leg stance loading, the maximum Z-axis fragmentary displacements were 5.060 mm for ICCS, 4.028 mm for FNS, and 2.796 mm for PCCP. The maximum displacements of internal fixations were 4.545 mm for ICCS, 3.047 mm for FNS, and 2.559 mm for PCCP. Peak VMS values were 512.21 MPa for ICCS, 242.86 MPa for FNS, and 413.85 MPa for PCCP. Under increasing vertical loads applied to the artificial bones, the average vertical axial stiffness for the ICCS, FNS, and PCCP groups were 244.86 ± 2.84 N/mm, 415.03 ± 27.10 N/mm, and 529.98 ± 23.08 N/mm. For the torsional moment tests, the PCCP group demonstrated significantly higher torque values at 2°, 4°, and 6° compared with FNS and ICCS, with no significant difference between FNS and ICCS (P > 0.05).
Conclusions: Finite element analysis and artificial bone models indicated that PCCP offers the best compressive and rotational stability for fixing Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures, followed by FNS and then ICCS. No significant difference in rotational resistance was observed between FNS and ICCS in synthetic bones. Level of Evidence Level 5.
{"title":"Biomechanical evaluation of percutaneous compression plate and femoral neck system in Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures.","authors":"Xiaoping Xie, Songqi Bi, Qingxu Song, Qiong Zhang, Zhixing Yan, Xiaoyang Zhou, Tiecheng Yu","doi":"10.1186/s10195-024-00792-0","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s10195-024-00792-0","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The optimal treatment for Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures remains contentious. We aim to compare the biomechanical properties of three inverted cannulated compression screw (ICCS), femoral neck system (FNS), and percutaneous compression plate (PCCP) to determine which offers superior stability for unstable femoral neck fractures.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Finite element analysis and artificial bone models were used to establish Pauwels III femoral neck fracture models. They were divided into ICCS, FNS, and PCCP groups based on respective internal fixation assemblies. The models were subjected to vertical axial loads (2100 N) and torsional forces (10 N × mm) along the femoral neck axis in the finite element analysis. The primary outcomes such as the Z axis fragmentary displacements, as well as displacements and the von Mises stress (VMS) distributions of internal fixations, were analyzed. Additionally, the artificial bones were subjected to progressively increasing vertical axial pressures and torsional moments at angles of 2°, 4°, and 6°, respectively. The vertical displacements of femoral heads and the required torque values were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Finite element analysis revealed that under single-leg stance loading, the maximum Z-axis fragmentary displacements were 5.060 mm for ICCS, 4.028 mm for FNS, and 2.796 mm for PCCP. The maximum displacements of internal fixations were 4.545 mm for ICCS, 3.047 mm for FNS, and 2.559 mm for PCCP. Peak VMS values were 512.21 MPa for ICCS, 242.86 MPa for FNS, and 413.85 MPa for PCCP. Under increasing vertical loads applied to the artificial bones, the average vertical axial stiffness for the ICCS, FNS, and PCCP groups were 244.86 ± 2.84 N/mm, 415.03 ± 27.10 N/mm, and 529.98 ± 23.08 N/mm. For the torsional moment tests, the PCCP group demonstrated significantly higher torque values at 2°, 4°, and 6° compared with FNS and ICCS, with no significant difference between FNS and ICCS (P > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Finite element analysis and artificial bone models indicated that PCCP offers the best compressive and rotational stability for fixing Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures, followed by FNS and then ICCS. No significant difference in rotational resistance was observed between FNS and ICCS in synthetic bones. Level of Evidence Level 5.</p>","PeriodicalId":48603,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology","volume":"25 1","pages":"61"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11607197/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142755369","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-27DOI: 10.1186/s10195-024-00796-w
Filippo Randelli, Alberto Fioruzzi, Alice Clemente, Alessandra Radaelli, Alessandra Menon, Danilo Di Via, Clemente Caria, Manuel Giovanni Mazzoleni, Claudio Buono, Paolo Di Benedetto, Michele Paciotti, Rocco Papalia, Gennaro Fiorentino, Marco Collarile, Manlio Panasci, Christian Carulli, Marco Rosolani, Federico Della Rocca, Simona Cerulli, Domenico Potestio, Michele Conati, Alberto Costantini, Gian Nicola Bisciotti, Alessandro Aprato, Loris Perticarini, Nicola Santori, Mattia Loppini, Giuseppe Solarino, Giovanni Vicenti, Vito Pavone, Alberto Di Martino, Fabrizio Rivera
Background: Patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures are essential for evaluating disease-related quality of life. The International Hip Outcome Tool 12 (iHOT12) assesses various aspects of hip-related symptoms, function, sports participation, and social limitations. This study aimed to adapt and validate an Italian version of the iHOT12 according to COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) guidelines.
Materials and methods: A multicenter observational cohort study was conducted to translate and validate the iHOT-12 into Italian (iHOT-12-ita) and assess its psychometric properties. Following international guidelines, we translated and culturally adapted the iHOT-12-ita. Patients with hip pain included in the study completed the iHOT-12-ita and mHHS-ita questionnaires at three timepoints: initial consultation (T0), 10-20 days later (T1), and at least 2 months after treatment (T2): hip injection, hip arthroscopy or total hip replacement. The evaluation of the iHOT-12-ita psychometric properties was conducted following the COSMIN checklist, assessing its reliability, responsiveness, interpretability, and acceptability.
Results: Between May 2019 to September 2022, 104 patients were included, from two tertiary hip surgery referral center clinics, they completed both questionnaires and were available for data analysis. The psychometric evaluations revealed robust test-retest reliability on 27 patients at T1, with a Lin coefficient of 0.709 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.553-0.888] and a high Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.745. At T2 after treatment, there was significant responsiveness (p < 0.001, n = 72), with excellent correlation observed between the iHOT-12-Ita and mHHS-Ita questionnaires (pwcorr = 0.7971). All predefined hypotheses were confirmed.
Conclusions: The Italian iHOT-12-ita proved reliable, valid, and responsive in assessing hip disease-related quality of life. Its implementation in routine clinical practice and research can enhance patient care and research quality in hip preservation surgery for the Italian orthopedic community.
{"title":"The international Hip Outcome Tool 12 questionnaire (iHOT-12): an Italian language cross-cultural adaptation and validation.","authors":"Filippo Randelli, Alberto Fioruzzi, Alice Clemente, Alessandra Radaelli, Alessandra Menon, Danilo Di Via, Clemente Caria, Manuel Giovanni Mazzoleni, Claudio Buono, Paolo Di Benedetto, Michele Paciotti, Rocco Papalia, Gennaro Fiorentino, Marco Collarile, Manlio Panasci, Christian Carulli, Marco Rosolani, Federico Della Rocca, Simona Cerulli, Domenico Potestio, Michele Conati, Alberto Costantini, Gian Nicola Bisciotti, Alessandro Aprato, Loris Perticarini, Nicola Santori, Mattia Loppini, Giuseppe Solarino, Giovanni Vicenti, Vito Pavone, Alberto Di Martino, Fabrizio Rivera","doi":"10.1186/s10195-024-00796-w","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s10195-024-00796-w","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures are essential for evaluating disease-related quality of life. The International Hip Outcome Tool 12 (iHOT12) assesses various aspects of hip-related symptoms, function, sports participation, and social limitations. This study aimed to adapt and validate an Italian version of the iHOT12 according to COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) guidelines.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A multicenter observational cohort study was conducted to translate and validate the iHOT-12 into Italian (iHOT-12-ita) and assess its psychometric properties. Following international guidelines, we translated and culturally adapted the iHOT-12-ita. Patients with hip pain included in the study completed the iHOT-12-ita and mHHS-ita questionnaires at three timepoints: initial consultation (T0), 10-20 days later (T1), and at least 2 months after treatment (T2): hip injection, hip arthroscopy or total hip replacement. The evaluation of the iHOT-12-ita psychometric properties was conducted following the COSMIN checklist, assessing its reliability, responsiveness, interpretability, and acceptability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between May 2019 to September 2022, 104 patients were included, from two tertiary hip surgery referral center clinics, they completed both questionnaires and were available for data analysis. The psychometric evaluations revealed robust test-retest reliability on 27 patients at T1, with a Lin coefficient of 0.709 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.553-0.888] and a high Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.745. At T2 after treatment, there was significant responsiveness (p < 0.001, n = 72), with excellent correlation observed between the iHOT-12-Ita and mHHS-Ita questionnaires (pwcorr = 0.7971). All predefined hypotheses were confirmed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Italian iHOT-12-ita proved reliable, valid, and responsive in assessing hip disease-related quality of life. Its implementation in routine clinical practice and research can enhance patient care and research quality in hip preservation surgery for the Italian orthopedic community.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>II.</p>","PeriodicalId":48603,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology","volume":"25 1","pages":"59"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11602895/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142740536","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}