Background: Both modular and monoblock tapered fluted titanium (TFT) stems are increasingly being used for revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA). However, the differences between the two designs in clinical outcomes and complications are not yet clear. Here, we intend to compare the efficacy and safety of modular versus monoblock TFT stems in rTHA.
Methods: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases were searched to include studies comparing modular and monoblock implants in rTHA. Data on the survivorship of stems, postoperative hip function, and complications were extracted following inclusion criteria. Inverse variance and Mantel-Haenszel methods in Review Manager (version 5.3 from Cochrane Collaboration) were used to evaluate differences between the two groups.
Results: Ten studies with a total of 2188 hips (1430 modular and 758 monoblock stems) were finally included. The main reason for the revision was aseptic loosening. Paprosky type III was the most common type in both groups. Both stems showed similar re-revision rates (modular vs monoblock: 10.3% vs 9.5%, P = 0.80) and Harris Hip Scores (WMD = 0.43, P = 0.46) for hip function. The intraoperative fracture rate was 11.6% and 5.0% (P = 0.0004) for modular and monoblock stems, respectively. The rate of subsidence > 10 mm was significantly higher in the monoblock group (4.5% vs 1.0%, P = 0.003). The application of extended trochanteric osteotomy was more popular in monoblock stems (22.7% vs 17.5%, P = 0.003). The incidence of postoperative complications such as periprosthetic femoral fracture and dislocation was similar between both stems.
Conclusions: No significant difference was found between modular and monoblock tapered stems as regards postoperative hip function, re-revision rates, and complications. Severe subsidence was more frequent in monoblock stems while modular ones were at higher risk of intraoperative fracture.
Level of evidence: Level III, systematic review of randomized control and non-randomized studies.
Trial registration: We registered our study in the international prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO) (CRD42020213642).
背景:模块化和单块锥形凹槽钛(TFT)柄越来越多地用于翻修全髋关节置换术(rTHA)。然而,两种设计在临床结果和并发症方面的差异尚不清楚。在这里,我们打算比较模块化与单块TFT系统在rTHA中的有效性和安全性。方法:检索PubMed、Embase、Web of Science和Cochrane Library数据库,包括比较rTHA中模块化植入物和单块植入物的研究。根据纳入标准提取茎的存活率、术后髋关节功能和并发症的数据。使用Review Manager (Cochrane Collaboration版本5.3)中的逆方差和Mantel-Haenszel方法来评估两组之间的差异。结果:最终纳入了10项研究,共2188个髋关节(1430个模块和758个单块茎)。修改的主要原因是无菌性松动。两组患者中最常见的是papprosky III型。两种支架在髋关节功能方面显示相似的再翻修率(模块化vs单块:10.3% vs 9.5%, P = 0.80)和Harris髋关节评分(WMD = 0.43, P = 0.46)。模组骨折率为11.6%,单块骨折率为5.0% (P = 0.0004)。单块组沉降bbb10 mm的速率显著高于对照组(4.5% vs 1.0%, P = 0.003)。扩展粗隆截骨术在单块骨柄中应用更为普遍(22.7% vs 17.5%, P = 0.003)。术后并发症如假体周围股骨骨折和脱位的发生率在两茎之间相似。结论:在术后髋关节功能、再翻修率和并发症方面,模块化和单块锥形柄无显著差异。严重的下陷在单块柄中更常见,而模块化柄在术中骨折的风险更高。证据等级:III级,随机对照和非随机研究的系统评价。试验注册:我们在国际前瞻性系统评价注册(PROSPERO) (CRD42020213642)中注册了我们的研究。
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of modular versus monoblock stems in revision total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Daofeng Wang, Hua Li, Wupeng Zhang, Huanyu Li, Cheng Xu, Wanheng Liu, Jiantao Li","doi":"10.1186/s10195-023-00731-5","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s10195-023-00731-5","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Both modular and monoblock tapered fluted titanium (TFT) stems are increasingly being used for revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA). However, the differences between the two designs in clinical outcomes and complications are not yet clear. Here, we intend to compare the efficacy and safety of modular versus monoblock TFT stems in rTHA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases were searched to include studies comparing modular and monoblock implants in rTHA. Data on the survivorship of stems, postoperative hip function, and complications were extracted following inclusion criteria. Inverse variance and Mantel-Haenszel methods in Review Manager (version 5.3 from Cochrane Collaboration) were used to evaluate differences between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten studies with a total of 2188 hips (1430 modular and 758 monoblock stems) were finally included. The main reason for the revision was aseptic loosening. Paprosky type III was the most common type in both groups. Both stems showed similar re-revision rates (modular vs monoblock: 10.3% vs 9.5%, P = 0.80) and Harris Hip Scores (WMD = 0.43, P = 0.46) for hip function. The intraoperative fracture rate was 11.6% and 5.0% (P = 0.0004) for modular and monoblock stems, respectively. The rate of subsidence > 10 mm was significantly higher in the monoblock group (4.5% vs 1.0%, P = 0.003). The application of extended trochanteric osteotomy was more popular in monoblock stems (22.7% vs 17.5%, P = 0.003). The incidence of postoperative complications such as periprosthetic femoral fracture and dislocation was similar between both stems.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>No significant difference was found between modular and monoblock tapered stems as regards postoperative hip function, re-revision rates, and complications. Severe subsidence was more frequent in monoblock stems while modular ones were at higher risk of intraoperative fracture.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level III, systematic review of randomized control and non-randomized studies.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>We registered our study in the international prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO) (CRD42020213642).</p>","PeriodicalId":48603,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology","volume":"24 1","pages":"50"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2023-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10505121/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10654436","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-09-16DOI: 10.1186/s10195-023-00732-4
Simona Pascucci, Francesco Langella, Michela Franzò, Marco Giovanni Tesse, Enrico Ciminello, Alessia Biondi, Eugenio Carrani, Letizia Sampaolo, Gustavo Zanoli, Pedro Berjano, Marina Torre
Background: Surgery involving implantable devices is widely used to solve several health issues. National registries are essential tools for implantable device surveillance and vigilance. In 2017, the European Union encouraged Member States to establish "registries and databanks for specific types of devices" to evaluate device safety and performance and ensure their traceability. Spine-implantable devices significantly impact patient safety and public health; spine registries might help improve surgical outcomes. This study aimed to map existing national spine surgery registries and highlight their features and organisational standards to provide an essential reference for establishing other national registries.
Methods: A scoping search was performed using the Embase, PubMed/Medline, Scopus, and Web of Science databases for the terms "registry", "register", "implantable", and all terms and synonyms related to spinal diseases and national registries in publications from January 2000 to December 2020. This search was later updated and finalised through a web search and an ad hoc survey to collect further detailed information.
Results: Sixty-two peer-reviewed articles were included, which were related to seven national spine registries, six of which were currently active. Three additional active national registries were found through the web search. The nine selected national registries were set up between 1998 and 2021. They collect data on the procedure and use patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for the follow-up.
Conclusion: Our study identified nine currently active national spine surgery registries. However, globally accepted standards for developing a national registry of spine surgery are yet to be established. Therefore, an international effort to increase result comparability across registries is highly advisable. We hope the recent initiative from the Orthopaedic Data Evaluation Panel (ODEP) to establish an international collaboration will meet these needs.
背景:植入式手术被广泛用于解决一些健康问题。国家登记处是植入式装置监测和警戒的重要工具。2017年,欧盟鼓励成员国建立“特定类型器械的注册和数据库”,以评估器械的安全性和性能,并确保其可追溯性。脊柱植入装置显著影响患者安全和公众健康;脊柱登记可能有助于改善手术结果。本研究旨在绘制现有国家脊柱外科登记系统的分布图,突出其特点和组织标准,为建立其他国家脊柱外科登记系统提供重要参考。方法:使用Embase、PubMed/Medline、Scopus和Web of Science数据库对2000年1月至2020年12月出版物中的术语“registry”、“register”、“implantable”以及与脊柱疾病和国家注册相关的所有术语和同义词进行范围搜索。后来通过网络搜索和收集进一步详细信息的特别调查更新并最终确定了这一搜索。结果:纳入了62篇同行评议的文章,这些文章与7个国家脊柱登记处有关,其中6个目前是活跃的。通过网络搜索发现了另外三个活跃的国家登记处。9个选定的国家登记处是在1998年至2021年之间建立的。他们收集手术过程的数据,并使用患者报告的结果测量(PROMs)进行随访。结论:我们的研究确定了9个目前活跃的国家脊柱外科登记处。然而,全球公认的脊柱手术登记标准尚未建立。因此,在国际上努力提高注册中心之间的结果可比性是非常可取的。我们希望骨科数据评估小组(ODEP)最近发起的建立国际合作的倡议能够满足这些需求。
{"title":"National spine surgery registries' characteristics and aims: globally accepted standards have yet to be met. Results of a scoping review and a complementary survey.","authors":"Simona Pascucci, Francesco Langella, Michela Franzò, Marco Giovanni Tesse, Enrico Ciminello, Alessia Biondi, Eugenio Carrani, Letizia Sampaolo, Gustavo Zanoli, Pedro Berjano, Marina Torre","doi":"10.1186/s10195-023-00732-4","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s10195-023-00732-4","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Surgery involving implantable devices is widely used to solve several health issues. National registries are essential tools for implantable device surveillance and vigilance. In 2017, the European Union encouraged Member States to establish \"registries and databanks for specific types of devices\" to evaluate device safety and performance and ensure their traceability. Spine-implantable devices significantly impact patient safety and public health; spine registries might help improve surgical outcomes. This study aimed to map existing national spine surgery registries and highlight their features and organisational standards to provide an essential reference for establishing other national registries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A scoping search was performed using the Embase, PubMed/Medline, Scopus, and Web of Science databases for the terms \"registry\", \"register\", \"implantable\", and all terms and synonyms related to spinal diseases and national registries in publications from January 2000 to December 2020. This search was later updated and finalised through a web search and an ad hoc survey to collect further detailed information.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-two peer-reviewed articles were included, which were related to seven national spine registries, six of which were currently active. Three additional active national registries were found through the web search. The nine selected national registries were set up between 1998 and 2021. They collect data on the procedure and use patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for the follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study identified nine currently active national spine surgery registries. However, globally accepted standards for developing a national registry of spine surgery are yet to be established. Therefore, an international effort to increase result comparability across registries is highly advisable. We hope the recent initiative from the Orthopaedic Data Evaluation Panel (ODEP) to establish an international collaboration will meet these needs.</p>","PeriodicalId":48603,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology","volume":"24 1","pages":"49"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10505129/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10654440","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-09-14DOI: 10.1186/s10195-023-00730-6
Ping Xia, Pengfei Tao, Xiaolong Zhao, Xianglin Peng, Songfeng Chen, Xiucai Ma, Lei Fan, Jing Feng, Feifei Pu
Background: This study aimed to analyze the clinical efficacy of one-stage anterior debridement of lower cervical tuberculosis using iliac crest bone graft fusion and internal fixation.
Materials and methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on 48 patients with lower cervical tuberculosis admitted to multiple medical centers from June 2018 to June 2021. Among them, 36 patients had lesions involving two vertebrae and 12 patients had lesions involving more than three vertebrae. All patients were treated with quadruple antituberculosis drugs for more than 2 weeks before the operation, and then treated with one-stage anterior debridement and autogenous iliac bone graft fusion combined with titanium plate internal fixation. After the operation, antituberculosis drugs were continued for 12-18 months. The patients were followed-up to observe the improvement in clinical symptoms, bone graft fusion, Cobb angle, visual analog score (VAS), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP), wound healing, and neurological function.
Results: The patients were followed-up for 13-43 months, with an average of 21.46 ± 1.52 months. The clinical symptoms significantly improved after the operation. The bone graft was completely fused in all patients, and the bone fusion time was 3-6 months, with an average of 4.16 ± 0.47 months. At the last follow-up, the Cobb angle, VAS, ESR, and CRP level were significantly lower than those before surgery (P < 0.05). None of the patients had loosening, detachment, or rupture of the internal fixation, and no recurrence occurred. All surgical incisions healed in one stage without infection or sinus formation. The preoperative Frankel neurological function classification was grade B in 7 cases, grade C in 13, grade D in 18, and grade E in 10. At the last follow-up, 8 cases recovered to grade D and 40 recovered to grade E.
Conclusions: For patients with lower cervical tuberculosis, based on oral treatment with quadruple antituberculosis drugs, direct decompression through anterior debridement, followed by autologous iliac bone graft fusion combined with internal fixation can completely remove tuberculosis foci, rebuild the stability of the cervical spine, and obtain good clinical efficacy. Level of evidence Level 3.
{"title":"Anterior debridement combined with autogenous iliac bone graft fusion for the treatment of lower cervical tuberculosis: a multicenter retrospective study.","authors":"Ping Xia, Pengfei Tao, Xiaolong Zhao, Xianglin Peng, Songfeng Chen, Xiucai Ma, Lei Fan, Jing Feng, Feifei Pu","doi":"10.1186/s10195-023-00730-6","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s10195-023-00730-6","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to analyze the clinical efficacy of one-stage anterior debridement of lower cervical tuberculosis using iliac crest bone graft fusion and internal fixation.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was performed on 48 patients with lower cervical tuberculosis admitted to multiple medical centers from June 2018 to June 2021. Among them, 36 patients had lesions involving two vertebrae and 12 patients had lesions involving more than three vertebrae. All patients were treated with quadruple antituberculosis drugs for more than 2 weeks before the operation, and then treated with one-stage anterior debridement and autogenous iliac bone graft fusion combined with titanium plate internal fixation. After the operation, antituberculosis drugs were continued for 12-18 months. The patients were followed-up to observe the improvement in clinical symptoms, bone graft fusion, Cobb angle, visual analog score (VAS), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP), wound healing, and neurological function.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The patients were followed-up for 13-43 months, with an average of 21.46 ± 1.52 months. The clinical symptoms significantly improved after the operation. The bone graft was completely fused in all patients, and the bone fusion time was 3-6 months, with an average of 4.16 ± 0.47 months. At the last follow-up, the Cobb angle, VAS, ESR, and CRP level were significantly lower than those before surgery (P < 0.05). None of the patients had loosening, detachment, or rupture of the internal fixation, and no recurrence occurred. All surgical incisions healed in one stage without infection or sinus formation. The preoperative Frankel neurological function classification was grade B in 7 cases, grade C in 13, grade D in 18, and grade E in 10. At the last follow-up, 8 cases recovered to grade D and 40 recovered to grade E.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>For patients with lower cervical tuberculosis, based on oral treatment with quadruple antituberculosis drugs, direct decompression through anterior debridement, followed by autologous iliac bone graft fusion combined with internal fixation can completely remove tuberculosis foci, rebuild the stability of the cervical spine, and obtain good clinical efficacy. Level of evidence Level 3.</p>","PeriodicalId":48603,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology","volume":"24 1","pages":"48"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2023-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10501986/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10287216","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-09-07DOI: 10.1186/s10195-023-00729-z
Elisa Pesare, Giovanni Vicenti, Elisaveta Kon, Massimo Berruto, Roberto Caporali, Biagio Moretti, Pietro S Randelli
Background: Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a chronic disease associated with a severe impact on quality of life. However, unfortunately, there are no evidence-based guidelines for the non-surgical management of this disease. While recognising the gap between scientific evidence and clinical practice, this position statement aims to present recommendations for the non-surgical management of knee OA, considering the available evidence and the clinical knowledge of experienced surgeons. The overall goal is to offer an evidenced-based expert opinion, aiding clinicians in the management of knee OA while considering the condition, values, needs and preferences of individual patients.
Methods: The study design for this position statement involved a preliminary search of PubMed, Google Scholar, Medline and Cochrane databases for literature spanning the period between January 2021 and April 2023, followed by screening of relevant articles (systematic reviews and meta-analyses). A Società Italiana Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SIOT) multidisciplinary task force (composed of four orthopaedic surgeons and a rheumatologist) subsequently formulated the recommendations.
Results: Evidence-based recommendations for the non-surgical management of knee OA were developed, covering assessment, general approach, patient information and education, lifestyle changes and physical therapy, walking aids, balneotherapy, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, pulsed electromagnetic field therapy, pharmacological interventions and injections.
Conclusions: For non-surgical management of knee OA, the recommended first step is to bring about lifestyle changes, particularly management of body weight combined with physical exercise and/or hydrotherapy. For acute symptoms, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), topic or oral, can be used. Opioids can only be used as third-line pharmacological treatment. Glucosamine and chondroitin are also suggested as chronic pharmacological treatment. Regarding intra-articular infiltrative therapy, the use of hyaluronic acid is recommended in cases of chronic knee OA [platelet-rich plasma (PRP) as second line), in the absence of active acute disease, while the use of intra-articular injections of cortisone is effective and preferred for severe acute symptoms.
{"title":"Italian Orthopaedic and Traumatology Society (SIOT) position statement on the non-surgical management of knee osteoarthritis.","authors":"Elisa Pesare, Giovanni Vicenti, Elisaveta Kon, Massimo Berruto, Roberto Caporali, Biagio Moretti, Pietro S Randelli","doi":"10.1186/s10195-023-00729-z","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s10195-023-00729-z","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a chronic disease associated with a severe impact on quality of life. However, unfortunately, there are no evidence-based guidelines for the non-surgical management of this disease. While recognising the gap between scientific evidence and clinical practice, this position statement aims to present recommendations for the non-surgical management of knee OA, considering the available evidence and the clinical knowledge of experienced surgeons. The overall goal is to offer an evidenced-based expert opinion, aiding clinicians in the management of knee OA while considering the condition, values, needs and preferences of individual patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study design for this position statement involved a preliminary search of PubMed, Google Scholar, Medline and Cochrane databases for literature spanning the period between January 2021 and April 2023, followed by screening of relevant articles (systematic reviews and meta-analyses). A Società Italiana Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SIOT) multidisciplinary task force (composed of four orthopaedic surgeons and a rheumatologist) subsequently formulated the recommendations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Evidence-based recommendations for the non-surgical management of knee OA were developed, covering assessment, general approach, patient information and education, lifestyle changes and physical therapy, walking aids, balneotherapy, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, pulsed electromagnetic field therapy, pharmacological interventions and injections.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>For non-surgical management of knee OA, the recommended first step is to bring about lifestyle changes, particularly management of body weight combined with physical exercise and/or hydrotherapy. For acute symptoms, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), topic or oral, can be used. Opioids can only be used as third-line pharmacological treatment. Glucosamine and chondroitin are also suggested as chronic pharmacological treatment. Regarding intra-articular infiltrative therapy, the use of hyaluronic acid is recommended in cases of chronic knee OA [platelet-rich plasma (PRP) as second line), in the absence of active acute disease, while the use of intra-articular injections of cortisone is effective and preferred for severe acute symptoms.</p>","PeriodicalId":48603,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology","volume":"24 1","pages":"47"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2023-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10485223/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10252453","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-09-04DOI: 10.1186/s10195-023-00726-2
Alessandro Aprato, Luigi Branca Vergano, Alessandro Casiraghi, Francesco Liuzza, Umberto Mezzadri, Alberto Balagna, Lorenzo Prandoni, Mohamed Rohayem, Lorenzo Sacchi, Amarildo Smakaj, Mario Arduini, Alessandro Are, Concetto Battiato, Marco Berlusconi, Federico Bove, Stefano Cattaneo, Matteo Cavanna, Federico Chiodini, Matteo Commessatti, Francesco Addevico, Rocco Erasmo, Alberto Ferreli, Claudio Galante, Pietro Domenico Giorgi, Federico Lamponi, Alessandro Moghnie, Michel Oransky, Antonio Panella, Raffaele Pascarella, Federico Santolini, Giuseppe Rosario Schiro, Marco Stella, Kristijan Zoccola, Alessandro Massé
<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is no evidence in the current literature about the best treatment option in sacral fracture with or without neurological impairment.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The Italian Pelvic Trauma Association (A.I.P.) decided to organize a consensus to define the best treatment for traumatic and insufficiency fractures according to neurological impairment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Consensus has been reached for the following statements: When complete neurological examination cannot be performed, pelvic X-rays, CT scan, hip and pelvis MRI, lumbosacral MRI, and lower extremities evoked potentials are useful. Lower extremities EMG should not be used in an acute setting; a patient with cauda equina syndrome associated with a sacral fracture represents an absolute indication for sacral reduction and the correct timing for reduction is "as early as possible". An isolated and incomplete radicular neurological deficit of the lower limbs does not represent an indication for laminectomy after reduction in the case of a displaced sacral fracture in a high-energy trauma, while a worsening and progressive radicular neurological deficit represents an indication. In the case of a displaced sacral fracture and neurological deficit with imaging showing no evidence of nerve root compression, a laminectomy after reduction is not indicated. In a patient who was not initially investigated from a neurological point of view, if a clinical investigation conducted after 72 h identifies a neurological deficit in the presence of a displaced sacral fracture with nerve compression on MRI, a laminectomy after reduction may be indicated. In the case of an indication to perform a sacral decompression, a first attempt with closed reduction through external manoeuvres is not mandatory. Transcondylar traction does not represent a valid method for performing a closed decompression. Following a sacral decompression, a sacral fixation (e.g. sacroiliac screw, triangular osteosynthesis, lumbopelvic fixation) should be performed. An isolated and complete radicular neurological deficit of the lower limbs represents an indication for laminectomy after reduction in the case of a displaced sacral fracture in a low-energy trauma associated with imaging suggestive of root compression. An isolated and incomplete radicular neurological deficit of the lower limbs does not represent an absolute indication. A worsening and progressive radicular neurological deficit of the lower limbs represents an indication for laminectomy after reduction in the case of a displaced sacral fracture in a low-energy trauma associated with imaging suggestive of root compression. In the case of a displaced sacral fracture and neurological deficit in a low-energy trauma, sacral decompression followed by surgical fixation is indicated.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This consensus collects expert opinion about this topic and may guide the surgeon in choosing the
{"title":"Consensus for management of sacral fractures: from the diagnosis to the treatment, with a focus on the role of decompression in sacral fractures.","authors":"Alessandro Aprato, Luigi Branca Vergano, Alessandro Casiraghi, Francesco Liuzza, Umberto Mezzadri, Alberto Balagna, Lorenzo Prandoni, Mohamed Rohayem, Lorenzo Sacchi, Amarildo Smakaj, Mario Arduini, Alessandro Are, Concetto Battiato, Marco Berlusconi, Federico Bove, Stefano Cattaneo, Matteo Cavanna, Federico Chiodini, Matteo Commessatti, Francesco Addevico, Rocco Erasmo, Alberto Ferreli, Claudio Galante, Pietro Domenico Giorgi, Federico Lamponi, Alessandro Moghnie, Michel Oransky, Antonio Panella, Raffaele Pascarella, Federico Santolini, Giuseppe Rosario Schiro, Marco Stella, Kristijan Zoccola, Alessandro Massé","doi":"10.1186/s10195-023-00726-2","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s10195-023-00726-2","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is no evidence in the current literature about the best treatment option in sacral fracture with or without neurological impairment.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The Italian Pelvic Trauma Association (A.I.P.) decided to organize a consensus to define the best treatment for traumatic and insufficiency fractures according to neurological impairment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Consensus has been reached for the following statements: When complete neurological examination cannot be performed, pelvic X-rays, CT scan, hip and pelvis MRI, lumbosacral MRI, and lower extremities evoked potentials are useful. Lower extremities EMG should not be used in an acute setting; a patient with cauda equina syndrome associated with a sacral fracture represents an absolute indication for sacral reduction and the correct timing for reduction is \"as early as possible\". An isolated and incomplete radicular neurological deficit of the lower limbs does not represent an indication for laminectomy after reduction in the case of a displaced sacral fracture in a high-energy trauma, while a worsening and progressive radicular neurological deficit represents an indication. In the case of a displaced sacral fracture and neurological deficit with imaging showing no evidence of nerve root compression, a laminectomy after reduction is not indicated. In a patient who was not initially investigated from a neurological point of view, if a clinical investigation conducted after 72 h identifies a neurological deficit in the presence of a displaced sacral fracture with nerve compression on MRI, a laminectomy after reduction may be indicated. In the case of an indication to perform a sacral decompression, a first attempt with closed reduction through external manoeuvres is not mandatory. Transcondylar traction does not represent a valid method for performing a closed decompression. Following a sacral decompression, a sacral fixation (e.g. sacroiliac screw, triangular osteosynthesis, lumbopelvic fixation) should be performed. An isolated and complete radicular neurological deficit of the lower limbs represents an indication for laminectomy after reduction in the case of a displaced sacral fracture in a low-energy trauma associated with imaging suggestive of root compression. An isolated and incomplete radicular neurological deficit of the lower limbs does not represent an absolute indication. A worsening and progressive radicular neurological deficit of the lower limbs represents an indication for laminectomy after reduction in the case of a displaced sacral fracture in a low-energy trauma associated with imaging suggestive of root compression. In the case of a displaced sacral fracture and neurological deficit in a low-energy trauma, sacral decompression followed by surgical fixation is indicated.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This consensus collects expert opinion about this topic and may guide the surgeon in choosing the ","PeriodicalId":48603,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology","volume":"24 1","pages":"46"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2023-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10477162/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10159667","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-08-24DOI: 10.1186/s10195-023-00721-7
Karl Wu, Ting Lin, Cheng-Han Lee
Background: Pathological fracture of the humerus causes severe pain, limited use of the hand, and decreased quality of life. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of intramedullary nailing and locking plate in treating metastatic pathological fractures of the proximal humerus.
Methods: This retrospective comparison study included 45 patients (22 male, 23 female) with proximal humerus metastatic pathological fractures who underwent surgical treatment between 2011 and 2022. All data were collected from medical records and were analyzed retrospectively. Seventeen cases underwent intramedullary nailing plus cement augmentation, and 28 cases underwent locking plate plus cement augmentation. The main outcomes were pain relief, function scores, and complications.
Results: Among 45 patients with mean age 61.7 ± 9.7 years, 23 (51.1%) had multiple bone metastases, and 28 (62.2%) were diagnosed with impending fractures. The nailing group had significantly lower blood loss [100 (60-200) versus 500 (350-600) ml, p < 0.001] and shorter hospital stay (8.4 ± 2.6 versus 12.3 ± 4.3 days, p < 0.001) than the plating group. Average follow-up time of the nailing group was 12 months and 16.5 months for the plating group. The nailing group had higher visual analog scale (VAS) scores than the plating group, indicating greater pain relief with nailing [7 (6-8) versus 6 (5-7), p = 0.01]. Musculoskeletal Tumor Society functional scores [28 (27-29) versus 27 (26.5-28.5), p = 0.23] were comparable between groups. No complications, local recurrence, or revision surgery were reported until the last follow-up in either group. However, one case in the plating group had a humeral head collapse and fragmentation without needing revision surgery.
Conclusions: Intramedullary nailing with cement augmentation is a viable option for treating proximal humerus metastatic pathological fracture, providing rigid fixation and better pain relief resulting in earlier mobility to optimize functional outcomes. Less invasive procedure with less blood loss and shorter hospital stay also benefits patients. Level of evidence Level II. Trial registration statement Not applicable.
{"title":"Intramedullary nailing versus cemented plate for treating metastatic pathological fracture of the proximal humerus: a comparison study and literature review.","authors":"Karl Wu, Ting Lin, Cheng-Han Lee","doi":"10.1186/s10195-023-00721-7","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s10195-023-00721-7","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pathological fracture of the humerus causes severe pain, limited use of the hand, and decreased quality of life. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of intramedullary nailing and locking plate in treating metastatic pathological fractures of the proximal humerus.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective comparison study included 45 patients (22 male, 23 female) with proximal humerus metastatic pathological fractures who underwent surgical treatment between 2011 and 2022. All data were collected from medical records and were analyzed retrospectively. Seventeen cases underwent intramedullary nailing plus cement augmentation, and 28 cases underwent locking plate plus cement augmentation. The main outcomes were pain relief, function scores, and complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 45 patients with mean age 61.7 ± 9.7 years, 23 (51.1%) had multiple bone metastases, and 28 (62.2%) were diagnosed with impending fractures. The nailing group had significantly lower blood loss [100 (60-200) versus 500 (350-600) ml, p < 0.001] and shorter hospital stay (8.4 ± 2.6 versus 12.3 ± 4.3 days, p < 0.001) than the plating group. Average follow-up time of the nailing group was 12 months and 16.5 months for the plating group. The nailing group had higher visual analog scale (VAS) scores than the plating group, indicating greater pain relief with nailing [7 (6-8) versus 6 (5-7), p = 0.01]. Musculoskeletal Tumor Society functional scores [28 (27-29) versus 27 (26.5-28.5), p = 0.23] were comparable between groups. No complications, local recurrence, or revision surgery were reported until the last follow-up in either group. However, one case in the plating group had a humeral head collapse and fragmentation without needing revision surgery.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Intramedullary nailing with cement augmentation is a viable option for treating proximal humerus metastatic pathological fracture, providing rigid fixation and better pain relief resulting in earlier mobility to optimize functional outcomes. Less invasive procedure with less blood loss and shorter hospital stay also benefits patients. Level of evidence Level II. Trial registration statement Not applicable.</p>","PeriodicalId":48603,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology","volume":"24 1","pages":"45"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2023-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10449752/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10435035","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-08-17DOI: 10.1186/s10195-023-00722-6
Matthias Luger, Clemens Schopper, Eliana S Krottenthaler, Mahmoud Mahmoud, Thomas Heyse, Tobias Gotterbarm, Antonio Klasan
Background: The Oxford Knee Score (OKS) has been designed for patients with knee osteoarthritis and has a widespread use. It has 12 questions, with each question having the same weight for the overall score. Some authors have observed a significant ceiling effect, especially when distinguishing slight postoperative differences. We hypothesized that each questions' weight will depend significantly on the patient's sociodemographic data and lifestyle.
Methods: In this international multicentric prospective study, we included patients attending a specialist outpatient knee clinic. Each patient filled out 3 questionnaires: (a) demographic data and data pertaining to the OKS, (b) the standard OKS, and (c) the patient gave a mark on the weight of the importance of each question, using a 5-point Likert scale (G OKS). Linear regression models were used for the analysis.
Results: In total 203 patients (106 female and 97 male) with a mean age of 64.5 (±12.7) years and a mean body mass index (BMI) of 29.34 (±5.45) kg/m2 were included. The most important questions for the patients were the questions for pain, washing, night pain, stability, and walking stairs with a median of 5. In the regression models, age, gender, and driving ability were the most important factors for the weight of each of the question.
Conclusion: The questions in the OKS differ significantly in weight for each patient, based on sociodemographic data, such as age, self-use of a car, and employment. With these differences, the Oxford Knee Score might be limited as an outcome measure. Adjustment of the OKS that incorporates the demographic differences into the final score might be useful if the ceiling effect is to be mitigated.
Level of evidence: Level II prospective prognostic study.
{"title":"Not all questions are created equal: the weight of the Oxford Knee Scores questions in a multicentric validation study.","authors":"Matthias Luger, Clemens Schopper, Eliana S Krottenthaler, Mahmoud Mahmoud, Thomas Heyse, Tobias Gotterbarm, Antonio Klasan","doi":"10.1186/s10195-023-00722-6","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s10195-023-00722-6","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Oxford Knee Score (OKS) has been designed for patients with knee osteoarthritis and has a widespread use. It has 12 questions, with each question having the same weight for the overall score. Some authors have observed a significant ceiling effect, especially when distinguishing slight postoperative differences. We hypothesized that each questions' weight will depend significantly on the patient's sociodemographic data and lifestyle.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this international multicentric prospective study, we included patients attending a specialist outpatient knee clinic. Each patient filled out 3 questionnaires: (a) demographic data and data pertaining to the OKS, (b) the standard OKS, and (c) the patient gave a mark on the weight of the importance of each question, using a 5-point Likert scale (G OKS). Linear regression models were used for the analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total 203 patients (106 female and 97 male) with a mean age of 64.5 (±12.7) years and a mean body mass index (BMI) of 29.34 (±5.45) kg/m<sup>2</sup> were included. The most important questions for the patients were the questions for pain, washing, night pain, stability, and walking stairs with a median of 5. In the regression models, age, gender, and driving ability were the most important factors for the weight of each of the question.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The questions in the OKS differ significantly in weight for each patient, based on sociodemographic data, such as age, self-use of a car, and employment. With these differences, the Oxford Knee Score might be limited as an outcome measure. Adjustment of the OKS that incorporates the demographic differences into the final score might be useful if the ceiling effect is to be mitigated.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level II prospective prognostic study.</p>","PeriodicalId":48603,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology","volume":"24 1","pages":"44"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2023-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10435438/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10402994","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-08-17DOI: 10.1186/s10195-023-00725-3
AboBakr Zein, Ahmed A Khalifa, Mohamed Eslam Elsherif, Hassan Elbarbary, Mohamed Youness Badaway
Background: The primary objective was to report our early results after a one-stage procedure [open reduction (OR), Dega pelvic osteotomy (DPO), and femoral osteotomy (FO) when needed] for surgical management of a cohort of patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). The secondary objective was to compare the functional, radiological, and complications among patients younger and older than 30 months.
Materials and methods: This prospective cohort study included 71 hips with DDH in 61 patients with a mean age of 34.3 ± 19.5 months. All patients underwent one-stage surgical procedures, including OR + DPO and FO, if needed. Functional and radiographic assessment at the last follow-up was conducted using the modified Severin grading system and the Severin classification system, respectively, in addition to assessing the acetabular index (AI), osteotomies healing, and presence of complications. We divided patients into two groups, younger than 30 months (group I) and older than 30 months (group II).
Results: We included 35 hips in group I and 36 in group II. All hips received OR + DPO, while 25 (69.4%) hips in group II had FO. The operative time was significantly longer in group II (103.19 ± 20.74 versus 72.43 ± 11.59 min, p < 0.001). After a mean follow up of 21.3 ± 2.3 months, the functional outcomes were satisfactory in 62 (87.3%) hips (94.3% in group I and 80.6% in group II, p = 0.35). There was a significant improvement in the AI in all patients compared with preoperative values (27.2° ± 2.9 versus 37° ± 4.2, p < 0.05). Furthermore, 63 (88.7%) hips had satisfactory radiographic outcomes (94.3% in group I and 83.3% in group II, p = 0.26), and all osteotomies showed radiographic healing. The overall complications incidence was significantly lower in group I compared with group II (5.7% versus 30.6%, p < 0.05), and avascular necrosis occurred in 4 (5.6%) hips, all in group II (p = 0.06).
Conclusion: One-stage procedure entailing open reduction, Dega pelvic osteotomy, and femoral osteotomy when needed for managing DDH in patients younger than eight years old revealed acceptable clinical and radiological outcomes. However, there was a higher need for a concomitant femoral osteotomy in patients older than 2.5 years, and complications were more frequent.
{"title":"Are the outcomes of single-stage open reduction and Dega osteotomy the same when treating DDH in patients younger than 8 years old? A prospective cohort study.","authors":"AboBakr Zein, Ahmed A Khalifa, Mohamed Eslam Elsherif, Hassan Elbarbary, Mohamed Youness Badaway","doi":"10.1186/s10195-023-00725-3","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s10195-023-00725-3","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The primary objective was to report our early results after a one-stage procedure [open reduction (OR), Dega pelvic osteotomy (DPO), and femoral osteotomy (FO) when needed] for surgical management of a cohort of patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). The secondary objective was to compare the functional, radiological, and complications among patients younger and older than 30 months.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This prospective cohort study included 71 hips with DDH in 61 patients with a mean age of 34.3 ± 19.5 months. All patients underwent one-stage surgical procedures, including OR + DPO and FO, if needed. Functional and radiographic assessment at the last follow-up was conducted using the modified Severin grading system and the Severin classification system, respectively, in addition to assessing the acetabular index (AI), osteotomies healing, and presence of complications. We divided patients into two groups, younger than 30 months (group I) and older than 30 months (group II).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 35 hips in group I and 36 in group II. All hips received OR + DPO, while 25 (69.4%) hips in group II had FO. The operative time was significantly longer in group II (103.19 ± 20.74 versus 72.43 ± 11.59 min, p < 0.001). After a mean follow up of 21.3 ± 2.3 months, the functional outcomes were satisfactory in 62 (87.3%) hips (94.3% in group I and 80.6% in group II, p = 0.35). There was a significant improvement in the AI in all patients compared with preoperative values (27.2° ± 2.9 versus 37° ± 4.2, p < 0.05). Furthermore, 63 (88.7%) hips had satisfactory radiographic outcomes (94.3% in group I and 83.3% in group II, p = 0.26), and all osteotomies showed radiographic healing. The overall complications incidence was significantly lower in group I compared with group II (5.7% versus 30.6%, p < 0.05), and avascular necrosis occurred in 4 (5.6%) hips, all in group II (p = 0.06).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>One-stage procedure entailing open reduction, Dega pelvic osteotomy, and femoral osteotomy when needed for managing DDH in patients younger than eight years old revealed acceptable clinical and radiological outcomes. However, there was a higher need for a concomitant femoral osteotomy in patients older than 2.5 years, and complications were more frequent.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence iii: </strong></p>","PeriodicalId":48603,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology","volume":"24 1","pages":"43"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2023-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10435432/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10103985","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-08-11DOI: 10.1186/s10195-023-00724-4
Zeger Rijs, Amber Weekhout, Stef Daniel, Jan W Schoones, Olivier Q Groot, Santiago A Lozano-Calderon, Michiel A J van de Sande
Background: Carbon-fibre (CF) plates are increasingly used for fracture fixation. This systematic review evaluated complications associated with CF plate fixation. It also compared outcomes of patients treated with CF plates versus metal plates, aiming to determine if CF plates offered comparable results. The study hypothesized that CF plates display similar complication rates and clinical outcomes as metal plates for fracture fixation.
Methods: The study adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The following databases were searched from database inception until June 2023: PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Emcare, Academic Search Premier and Google Scholar. Studies reporting on clinical and radiological outcomes of patients treated with CF plates for traumatic fractures and (impending) pathological fractures were included. Study quality was assessed, and complications were documented as number and percentage per anatomic region.
Results: A total of 27 studies of moderate to very low quality of evidence were included. Of these, 22 studies (800 patients, median follow-up 12 months) focused on traumatic fractures, and 5 studies (102 patients, median follow-up 12 months) on (impending) pathological fractures. A total of 11 studies (497 patients, median follow-up 16 months) compared CF plates with metal plates. Regarding traumatic fractures, the following complications were mostly reported: soft tissue complications (52 out of 391; 13%) for the humerus, structural complications (6 out of 291; 2%) for the distal radius, nonunion and structural complication (1 out of 34; 3%) for the femur, and infection (4 out of 104; 4%) for the ankle. For (impending) pathological fractures, the most frequently reported complications were infections (2 out of 14; 14%) for the humerus and structural complication (6 out of 86; 7%) for the femur/tibia. Comparative studies reported mixed results, although the majority (7 out of 11; 64%) reported no significant differences in clinical or radiological outcomes between patients treated with CF or metal plates.
Conclusion: This systematic review did not reveal a concerning number of complications related to CF plate fixation. Comparative studies showed no significant differences between CF plates and metal plates for traumatic fracture fixation. Therefore, CF plates appear to be a viable alternative to metal plates. However, high-quality randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with long-term follow-up are strongly recommended to provide additional evidence supporting the use of CF plates.
Level of evidence: III, systematic review.
背景:碳纤维(CF)钢板越来越多地用于骨折固定。本系统综述评估了CF钢板固定相关的并发症。它还比较了CF钢板与金属钢板治疗的患者的结果,旨在确定CF钢板是否提供可比较的结果。该研究假设CF钢板与金属钢板在骨折固定中的并发症发生率和临床结果相似。方法:本研究遵循系统评价和荟萃分析指南的首选报告项目。从数据库建立到2023年6月,检索了以下数据库:PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Emcare, Academic Search Premier和谷歌Scholar。研究报告了CF钢板治疗外伤性骨折和(即将发生的)病理性骨折的临床和影像学结果。评估研究质量,记录每个解剖区域的并发症数量和百分比。结果:共纳入了27项证据质量中至极低的研究。其中,22项研究(800例患者,中位随访12个月)关注外伤性骨折,5项研究(102例患者,中位随访12个月)关注(即将发生的)病理性骨折。共有11项研究(497例患者,中位随访16个月)比较CF钢板与金属钢板。对于外伤性骨折,以下并发症报道最多:软组织并发症(391例中有52例;13%)肱骨,结构性并发症(291例中有6例;2%)为桡骨远端、骨不连和结构并发症(1 / 34;3%),感染(104例中有4例;4%)脚踝。对于(即将发生的)病理性骨折,最常见的并发症是感染(14例中2例;14%)为肱骨和结构并发症(86例中有6例;7%)为股骨/胫骨。比较研究报告的结果好坏参半,尽管大多数(11人中有7人;64%)报告CF或金属钢板治疗患者的临床或放射学结果无显著差异。结论:本系统综述未发现CF板固定相关并发症的数量。比较研究显示CF钢板与金属钢板在外伤性骨折固定中无显著差异。因此,CF板似乎是一个可行的替代金属板。然而,强烈推荐高质量的随机对照试验(RCTs)进行长期随访,以提供支持CF钢板使用的额外证据。证据等级:III级,系统评价。
{"title":"Carbon-fibre plates for traumatic and (impending) pathological fracture fixation: Where do we stand? A systematic review.","authors":"Zeger Rijs, Amber Weekhout, Stef Daniel, Jan W Schoones, Olivier Q Groot, Santiago A Lozano-Calderon, Michiel A J van de Sande","doi":"10.1186/s10195-023-00724-4","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s10195-023-00724-4","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Carbon-fibre (CF) plates are increasingly used for fracture fixation. This systematic review evaluated complications associated with CF plate fixation. It also compared outcomes of patients treated with CF plates versus metal plates, aiming to determine if CF plates offered comparable results. The study hypothesized that CF plates display similar complication rates and clinical outcomes as metal plates for fracture fixation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The following databases were searched from database inception until June 2023: PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Emcare, Academic Search Premier and Google Scholar. Studies reporting on clinical and radiological outcomes of patients treated with CF plates for traumatic fractures and (impending) pathological fractures were included. Study quality was assessed, and complications were documented as number and percentage per anatomic region.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 27 studies of moderate to very low quality of evidence were included. Of these, 22 studies (800 patients, median follow-up 12 months) focused on traumatic fractures, and 5 studies (102 patients, median follow-up 12 months) on (impending) pathological fractures. A total of 11 studies (497 patients, median follow-up 16 months) compared CF plates with metal plates. Regarding traumatic fractures, the following complications were mostly reported: soft tissue complications (52 out of 391; 13%) for the humerus, structural complications (6 out of 291; 2%) for the distal radius, nonunion and structural complication (1 out of 34; 3%) for the femur, and infection (4 out of 104; 4%) for the ankle. For (impending) pathological fractures, the most frequently reported complications were infections (2 out of 14; 14%) for the humerus and structural complication (6 out of 86; 7%) for the femur/tibia. Comparative studies reported mixed results, although the majority (7 out of 11; 64%) reported no significant differences in clinical or radiological outcomes between patients treated with CF or metal plates.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This systematic review did not reveal a concerning number of complications related to CF plate fixation. Comparative studies showed no significant differences between CF plates and metal plates for traumatic fracture fixation. Therefore, CF plates appear to be a viable alternative to metal plates. However, high-quality randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with long-term follow-up are strongly recommended to provide additional evidence supporting the use of CF plates.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>III, systematic review.</p>","PeriodicalId":48603,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology","volume":"24 1","pages":"42"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2023-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10421838/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10005446","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-08-04DOI: 10.1186/s10195-023-00720-8
Eleonora Croci, Fabian Warmuth, Cornelia Baum, Balazs Krisztian Kovacs, Corina Nüesch, Daniel Baumgartner, Andreas Marc Müller, Annegret Mündermann
Background: Rotator cuff muscles stabilise the glenohumeral joint and contribute to the initial abduction phase with other shoulder muscles. This study aimed to determine if the load-induced increase in shoulder muscle activity during a 30° abduction test is influenced by asymptomatic or symptomatic rotator cuff pathologies.
Materials and methods: Twenty-five patients with unilateral rotator cuff tears (age, 64.3 ± 10.2 years), 25 older control subjects (55.4 ± 8.2 years) and 25 younger control subjects (26.1 ± 2.3 years) participated in this study. Participants performed a bilateral 30° arm abduction and adduction movement in the scapular plane with handheld weights (0-4 kg). Activity of the deltoid, infraspinatus, biceps brachii, pectoralis major, latissimus dorsi and upper trapezius muscles was analysed at maximum abduction angle after normalisation to maximum voluntary contraction. Shoulders were classified into rotator cuff tendinopathy, asymptomatic and symptomatic rotator cuff tears, and healthy based on magnetic resonance images. A linear mixed model (loads, shoulder types) with random effects (shoulder identification) was applied to the log-transformed muscle activities.
Results: Muscle activity increased with increasing load in all muscles and shoulder types (P < 0.001), and 1-kg increments in additional weights were significant (P < 0.001). Significant effects of rotator cuff pathologies were found for all muscles analysed (P < 0.05). In all muscles, activity was at least 20% higher in symptomatic rotator cuff tears than in healthy shoulders (P < 0.001). Symptomatic rotator cuff tears showed 20-32% higher posterior deltoid (P < 0.05) and 19-25% higher pectoralis major (P < 0.01) activity when compared with asymptomatic tears.
Conclusions: Rotator cuff pathologies are associated with greater relative activity of shoulder muscles, even with low levels of additional load. Therefore, the inclusion of loaded shoulder tests in the diagnosis and rehabilitation of rotator cuff pathologies can provide important insight into the functional status of shoulders and can be used to guide treatment decisions.
Level of evidence: Level 2.
Trial registration: Ethical approval was obtained from the regional ethics committee (Ethics Committee Northwest Switzerland EKNZ 2021-00182), and the study was registered at clinicaltrials.gov on 29 March 2021 (trial registration number NCT04819724, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04819724 ).
{"title":"Load-induced increase in muscle activity during 30° abduction in patients with rotator cuff tears and control subjects.","authors":"Eleonora Croci, Fabian Warmuth, Cornelia Baum, Balazs Krisztian Kovacs, Corina Nüesch, Daniel Baumgartner, Andreas Marc Müller, Annegret Mündermann","doi":"10.1186/s10195-023-00720-8","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s10195-023-00720-8","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Rotator cuff muscles stabilise the glenohumeral joint and contribute to the initial abduction phase with other shoulder muscles. This study aimed to determine if the load-induced increase in shoulder muscle activity during a 30° abduction test is influenced by asymptomatic or symptomatic rotator cuff pathologies.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Twenty-five patients with unilateral rotator cuff tears (age, 64.3 ± 10.2 years), 25 older control subjects (55.4 ± 8.2 years) and 25 younger control subjects (26.1 ± 2.3 years) participated in this study. Participants performed a bilateral 30° arm abduction and adduction movement in the scapular plane with handheld weights (0-4 kg). Activity of the deltoid, infraspinatus, biceps brachii, pectoralis major, latissimus dorsi and upper trapezius muscles was analysed at maximum abduction angle after normalisation to maximum voluntary contraction. Shoulders were classified into rotator cuff tendinopathy, asymptomatic and symptomatic rotator cuff tears, and healthy based on magnetic resonance images. A linear mixed model (loads, shoulder types) with random effects (shoulder identification) was applied to the log-transformed muscle activities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Muscle activity increased with increasing load in all muscles and shoulder types (P < 0.001), and 1-kg increments in additional weights were significant (P < 0.001). Significant effects of rotator cuff pathologies were found for all muscles analysed (P < 0.05). In all muscles, activity was at least 20% higher in symptomatic rotator cuff tears than in healthy shoulders (P < 0.001). Symptomatic rotator cuff tears showed 20-32% higher posterior deltoid (P < 0.05) and 19-25% higher pectoralis major (P < 0.01) activity when compared with asymptomatic tears.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Rotator cuff pathologies are associated with greater relative activity of shoulder muscles, even with low levels of additional load. Therefore, the inclusion of loaded shoulder tests in the diagnosis and rehabilitation of rotator cuff pathologies can provide important insight into the functional status of shoulders and can be used to guide treatment decisions.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level 2.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Ethical approval was obtained from the regional ethics committee (Ethics Committee Northwest Switzerland EKNZ 2021-00182), and the study was registered at clinicaltrials.gov on 29 March 2021 (trial registration number NCT04819724, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04819724 ).</p>","PeriodicalId":48603,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology","volume":"24 1","pages":"41"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2023-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10403481/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10005714","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}