Background: The ligamentum teres (LT) has received attention in patients undergoing hip arthroscopy (HA) for femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). Indeed, a better understanding of the function of the LT and its implications for clinical outcomes in the presence of a torn LT is required. This systematic review analyses the patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and the complication rate when an intact or torn LT is encountered during HA for FAI.
Methods: Studies that compared patients with an intact to those with a torn LT managed with debridement during hip arthroscopy for FAI were identified from the Web of Science, PubMed, and Embase. The minimum follow-up for inclusion was 24 months. The Risk of Bias in Non-randomised Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool was used to assess the risk of bias. Patient characteristics and PROMs were assessed at the baseline and last follow-up.
Results: The systematic review identified two studies comprising 611 patients. No statistically significant difference was found in pain, Harris Hip Score, and the activities of daily living and sports subscales of the Hip Outcome Score between patients with an intact LT and those with a torn LT treated with debridement, both of whom underwent HA for FAI.
Conclusions: In patients undergoing arthroscopic management for FAI, an intact or torn ligamentum teres managed with debridement does not influence postoperative PROMs. Given the importance of the LT as a structure of the hip joint and the increasing interest in HA for FAI, further standardised studies will be a valuable source for surgeons encountering this pathology.
The medial collateral ligament (MCL) is by far the most commonly injured ligament of the knee. The medial ligament complex covers a broad bony surface on the extraarticular portion of the femur and is highly vascularized, which allows for a high healing potential. For this reason, most MCL complex lesions were treated conservatively in the past. However, recent advancements regarding the MCL anatomy and kinematics highlighted the complex biomechanical behavior of the isolated and combined MCL lesion, and it is now fully appreciated that some MCL lesions warrant surgical treatment. The present review aims to provide the reader with an overview of the new evidence and advancement on the complex anatomy, biomechanics, and treatment of the MCL.
Background: Patients affected by chronic kidney disease (CKD) are at increased risk of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) after total hip arthroplasty (THA). This patient population has a higher risk of recurrent infections and hospitalization. The aim of this study is to compare the profile of microorganisms in patients with CKD and PJI of the hip versus controls and to individuate potentially unusual and drug-resistant microorganisms among the causative bacteria.
Materials and methods: A total of 4261 patients affected by PJI of the hip were retrospectively studied. Patients affected by CKD in this population were identified and compared with a control group of patients with PJI but without CKD. Data on patient characteristics and comorbidities were collected. The microorganisms responsible for PJI were identified and compared between both groups.
Results: The CKD group included 409 patients, 54.3% male, mean age of 73.8 ± 8.9 years, a higher body mass index (BMI) than the general population (29.88 ± 5.90 kg/m2), and higher age-adjusted CCI of 6.15 ± 2.35. Overall, 70 different isolates of microorganisms were identified, including 52 Gram-positive spp., 28 Gram-negative spp., 3 fungi, and 1 mycobacterium. Polymicrobial infections were more common in CKD group than controls (47.9% versus 30.9%; p < 0.0001). Staphylococcus spp. were the most common bacteria in both groups, followed by Gram-negative Enterobacteriaceae and Streptococcus spp. CKD group showed a higher risk of developing infections caused by Staphylococcus aureus (p = 0.003), Gram-negative bacteria, and Candida (p = 0.035).
Conclusions: Renal failure exposes patients who undergo THA to PJI caused by microorganisms that are potentially more drug resistant, leading to a higher risk of treatment failure. Knowing in advance the different microorganism profiles could help to plan a different surgical strategy.
Level of evidence iii:
Purpose: This study's primary objective was to evaluate the effectiveness of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) administration for meniscal injuries treated with meniscal repair procedures (sutures), using radiologic measures and clinical scales. The secondary objective was to identify potential bias-inducing elements in the analyzed studies.
Methods: In December 2023, a systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, and Scopus for randomized controlled trials. This review compares PRP with placebo. Three studies were finally selected. The risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane's Risk of Bias Tool 2. Radiologic evaluation of meniscal healing was measured with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and arthroscopic studies, while clinical evaluation was performed using four scales [Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), visual analog scale (VAS), International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form (IKDC), and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Index (WOMAC)] and by recording the incidence of complications.
Results: The three selected studies included 139 patients; of these, 76 (54.7%) were randomly assigned to the intervention group (PRP injection) and 63 (45.3%) to the control group (placebo). The mean age of the intervention group was 37.4 ± 7.5 years, while the mean age of the control group was 36.5 ± 9.2 years. There were 41 female patients (29.5%). The median follow-up duration was 27.58 ± 17.3 months. MRI evaluation did not show a significant improvement in the PRP group in any of the studies (p-value = 0.41-0.54). However, when assessed by the cumulative evaluation of MRI and arthroscopy, the cumulative failure rate was significantly better in the PRP group (p-value = 0.04-0.048). One study that evaluated isolated arthroscopy also showed significant improvement in the PRP group (p = 0.003). Regarding the VAS scale, no study demonstrated a significant difference, except for one study that showed significant improvement after 6 months and in the difference between the 3rd and 6th months. The KOOS scale yielded conflicting results; one study showed no significant difference, while the other two indicated significant improvement. The IKDC and WOMAC scales were evaluated in two studies, showing opposite results. All included studies reported no complications, and one study indicated no increased risk in the treatment group.
Conclusions: The results of this review indicate the necessity for further studies to make a definitive statement about the effectiveness of PRP administration in meniscal repair processes. Level of evidence Systematic review and meta-analysis of articles of level 1.
Background: Quadriceps tendon (QT), bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB), and hamstring tendon (HT) autografts are widely used for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), but the optimal autograft choice remains controversial. This study assessed the treatment effects of QT versus BPTB and HT autografts for ACLR.
Methods: The PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched for eligible studies published from inception until July 2022. Effect estimates were presented as odds ratios (OR) and weighted mean differences (WMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for categorical and continuous variables, respectively. All pooled analyses were performed using a random-effects model.
Results: Twenty-one studies (3 randomized controlled trials [RCTs], 3 prospective studies, and 15 retrospective studies) involving 2964 patients with ACLR were selected for meta-analysis. Compared with the HT autograft, the QT autograft was associated with a reduced risk of graft failure (OR: 0.46; 95% CI: 0.23-0.93; P = 0.031). Compared with the BPTB autograft, the QT autograft was associated with a reduced risk of donor site pain (OR: 0.16; 95% CI: 0.10-0.24; P < 0.001). Moreover, the QT autograft was associated with a lower side-to-side difference than that observed with the HT autograft (WMD: - 0.74; 95% CI: - 1.47 to - 0.01; P = 0.048). Finally, compared with the BPTB autograft, the QT autograft was associated with a reduced risk of moderate-to-severe kneecap symptoms during sports and work activities (OR: 0.14; 95% CI: 0.05-0.37; P < 0.001).
Conclusions: The findings of this study suggest that the QT autograft can be defined as a safe and effective alternative choice for ACLR, but its superiority is yet to be proven by RCTs and prospective studies. Level of evidence Level III.
Total hip arthroplasty (THA) has significantly improved the lives of patients with degenerative hip disorders. The direct anterior approach (DAA) is favored for its minimally invasive nature, leading to less postoperative pain and a faster recovery. The bikini incision (BI) approach was developed to enhance aesthetic outcomes while maintaining the clinical and functional benefits of the DAA. Despite its advantages, the BI technique presents challenges, controversies persist regarding its efficacy and safety, and there is no consensus within the medical community about its overall benefits. Incisions aligned with Langer's lines, like the BI, promote better healing and minimal scarring. Studies indicate that BI patients report higher satisfaction with scar appearance and texture compared to traditional DAA patients. However, the BI carries a higher risk of lateral femoral cutaneous nerve (LFCN) injury, although most symptoms resolve within 6 months. For obese patients, the BI is associated with fewer complications, such as infections and delayed healing, compared to the conventional DAA, making it a safe and effective option. BI patients also experience better aesthetic outcomes and functional recovery, with reduced pain and itching. The BI technique in THA represents a significant advancement, offering improved aesthetic and wound-healing outcomes. The shift from the traditional DAA to the BI aligns with patient preferences for scars that are less visible and conspicuous. Despite the steep learning curve and risks, careful patient selection and refined surgical techniques can enhance the BI's benefits. Future research should focus on long-term outcomes and comparative studies to further establish the BI's efficacy and safety. As patient demand for aesthetically favorable surgeries grows, the BI is likely to become a preferred approach in THA.
Background: Postoperative femoral head cartilage injury (FHCI) is a rare condition that can be observed in a certain proportion of patients undergoing hip arthroscopy. However, the prevalence and associated factors of FHCI, and the effect of this condition on clinical outcomes still remain unknown.
Patients and methods: Consecutive patients who were diagnosed with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) and labral tear and underwent hip arthroscopic treatment in our institute between July 2020 and July 2021 were retrospectively evaluated. Supine anteroposterior hip radiographs, cross-table lateral radiographs, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and computed tomography (CT) were obtained preoperatively. Postoperative MRI, at least 6 months after arthroscopy, was performed. Postoperative FHCI was evaluated by two surgeons through MRI. Preoperative patient-reported outcomes (PROs) including visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, and modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) before surgery and at final followup were obtained.
Results: A total of 196 patients were included. Postoperative FHCI was identified in 21 (10.7%) patients. The intraobserver reliability of the observer A and B for detecting postoperative FHCI using 3.0-T MRI was high (k = 0.929, and k = 0.947, respectively). The interobserver reliability between the two observers for detecting FHCI using 3.0-T MRI was high (k = 0.919). There was no significant difference in preoperative and postoperative mHHS, VAS, and percentage of patients who surpassed minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and achieved patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) between patients with and without postoperative FHCI (P > 0.05).
Conclusion: Although postoperative FHCI was observed in 10.7% of patients, which was associated with larger labrum, this condition did not result in inferior clinical outcomes. Level of evidence IV, retrospective case series. Trial registration The Chinese Clinical Trial Registry approved the registration (ChiCTR2200061166). The date of registration is 2022-06-15.
Background: Autologous minced cartilage is a method for cartilage defect repair, and our study focuses on a newly developed biphasic cylindrical osteochondral construct designed for use in human knees. We aimed to compare its clinical effectiveness and safety with microfracture, the commonly utilized reparative treatment for knee chondral or osteochondral defects.
Materials and methods: Conducted as a prospective multicenter, randomized controlled, non-inferiority trial across nine hospitals, the study involved 92 patients with International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) grade 3 to 4 chondral or osteochondral lesions on femoral condyles. Patients were evenly randomized to receive either the biphasic cartilage-repair implant (BiCRI) or microfracture. Functional outcomes and safety assessments were conducted at postoperative intervals of 6 weeks and 3, 6, and 12 months. Primary and secondary endpoints included International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) 2000 Subjective Knee Evaluation Form score improvement, the grade distribution in the IKDC 2000 Knee Examination Form, and various assessments, such as the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), visual analog scales (VASs) for pain, MRI findings, and arthroscopic findings at 12 months.
Results: Out of the initial participants, 47 in the BiCRI group and 45 in the microfracture group completed the follow-up. At 12 months, the mean change in IKDC total score was 25.56 ± 18.48 for BiCRI and 27.51 ± 23.65 for microfracture. The 95% confidence interval (CI) for the score difference (BiCRI minus microfracture) was - 6.95, exceeding the non-inferiority margin of - 12. Secondary endpoints indicated comparable functional outcomes, and arthroscopic findings demonstrated more fully regenerated cartilage in the BiCRI group.
Conclusion: Based on the IKDC 2000 Subjective Knee Evaluation Form score, BiCRI proved non-inferior to microfracture at 12 months. Short-term functional outcomes were comparable to those with microfracture, while arthroscopic findings showed more complete cartilage regeneration in the BiCRI group. Consequently, BiCRI emerges as a viable alternative for treating chondral or osteochondral defects.
Level of evidence: Level 2, multi-center, randomized clinical trial.
Trial registration: Name of the registry: ClinicalTrials.gov.
Trial registration number: NCT01477008. Date of registration: 11/14/2011. URL of trial registry record: clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT01477008.
Background: The risk factors for proximal radial abnormalities (PRA) in paediatric patients with untreated chronic Monteggia fractures (CMFs) are unclear. This multicentre study aimed to evaluate the risk factors for PRA in children with untreated CMFs.
Materials and methods: The clinical data of 142 patients (mean age at the time of injury: 5.73 years) with untreated unilateral CMFs were retrospectively reviewed. The radial neck-shaft angle (RNSAP) and radial head size (RHL) were measured on anteroposterior (AP) and lateral (L) radiographs, respectively. The RHL size was the ratio of the widest width of the proximal radial metaphysis to the narrowest radial neck width. The En-RNSAP and En-RHL were the ratios of the enlargement (En) of the RNSAP angle and RHL size of the injured elbow to those of the uninjured elbow, respectively. Paired-sample t-tests, single-factor analyses and multiple linear regression analyses were performed to evaluate the correlation between the differences in these parameters between the injured and uninjured elbows and the assessed risk factors. These risk factors included institution, sex, laterality, age at injury, time from injury to diagnosis, direction of RH dislocation, distance of RH dislocation (DD-RH), presence of radial or median nerve injury, heterotopic ossification and immobilization of the elbow after injury.
Results: In children with untreated CMFs (mean time from injury to diagnosis: 14.6 months), Student's t-test revealed a significant difference in the RHL size (P < 0.001) but not in the RNSAP angle (P = 0.075) between the injured and uninjured elbows. Pearson correlation analysis revealed a potential correlation between En-RHL and age at the time of injury (P = 0.069), time from injury to diagnosis (P < 0.001) and DD-RH (P < 0.001), excluding other risk factors (P > 0.05). Multiple linear regression analysis revealed that age at the time of injury (P = 0.047), time from injury to diagnosis (P = 0.007) and DD-RH (P = 0.001) were risk factors for an increased En-RHL in patients with untreated CMFs; the variability in En-RHL among the other three risk factors was 21.4%.
Conclusions: In paediatric patients with unilateral untreated CMFs, PRA of the injured elbow consisted mainly of RH enlargement or radial neck narrowing rather than valgus deformities of the proximal radius. Older age at injury, increased time from injury to diagnosis and DD-RH were risk factors for more severe PRA.
Level of evidence: III.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：