Pub Date : 2024-05-24DOI: 10.1186/s10195-024-00768-0
Paul Rodham, Farihah Khaliq, Vasileos Giannoudis, Peter V Giannoudis
Mesenchymal stem cells are core to bone homeostasis and repair. They both provide the progenitor cells from which bone cells are formed and regulate the local cytokine environment to create a pro-osteogenic environment. Dysregulation of these cells is often seen in orthopaedic pathology and can be manipulated by the physician treating the patient. This narrative review aims to describe the common applications of cell therapies to bone healing whilst also suggesting the future direction of these techniques.
{"title":"Cellular therapies for bone repair: current insights.","authors":"Paul Rodham, Farihah Khaliq, Vasileos Giannoudis, Peter V Giannoudis","doi":"10.1186/s10195-024-00768-0","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s10195-024-00768-0","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Mesenchymal stem cells are core to bone homeostasis and repair. They both provide the progenitor cells from which bone cells are formed and regulate the local cytokine environment to create a pro-osteogenic environment. Dysregulation of these cells is often seen in orthopaedic pathology and can be manipulated by the physician treating the patient. This narrative review aims to describe the common applications of cell therapies to bone healing whilst also suggesting the future direction of these techniques.</p>","PeriodicalId":48603,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology","volume":"25 1","pages":"28"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2024-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11132192/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141094696","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-05-20DOI: 10.1186/s10195-024-00769-z
Juan Boluda-Mengod, Beatriz Olías-López, Pau Forcada-Calvet, Azucena Martín-Herrero, Mario Herrera-Pérez, Javier Álvarez-De-La-Cruz, Alejandro Herrera-Rodríguez, José Luis Pais-Brito
Background: Tibial plateau fractures involving posteromedial (PM) and posterolateral (PL) columns are complex injuries that require an appropriate approach. The management of the PL column in these cases can be controversial, and limitations using deep posteromedial interval approaches have been referenced. In this paper, a modification of the Lobenhoffer approach, designed to optimize the access to the PL column, is described in detail. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of this approach in a cadaveric anatomical study.
Materials and methods: In total, five fresh-frozen cadaveric specimens were used for detailed anatomical study surrounding the approach. Relationships with cutaneous and deep neurovascular structures were evaluated. The exposure area of the PL and PM columns using this approach was assessed.
Results: The cadaveric study showed safe and adequate exposure. Oblique skin and fascia incision just medial to the posterior midline was safe to protect the medial sural cutaneous nerve and the small saphenous vein. Elevation of the popliteus and tibialis posterior muscles offered safe protection of the anterior tibial artery and popliteal neurovascular bundle during retractor placement. Adequate full proximal exposure of the PM and PL columns, including the posterolateral lateral (PLL) and posterolateral central (PLC) segments, was obtained in all specimens.
Conclusions: The Modified Oblique Lobenhoffer (MOL) approach can be a feasible option to access PL and PM columns in tibial plateau fractures.
{"title":"Modified Oblique Lobenhoffer (MOL) approach for posterolateral and posteromedial column access in tibial plateau fractures: a detailed cadaveric anatomical study.","authors":"Juan Boluda-Mengod, Beatriz Olías-López, Pau Forcada-Calvet, Azucena Martín-Herrero, Mario Herrera-Pérez, Javier Álvarez-De-La-Cruz, Alejandro Herrera-Rodríguez, José Luis Pais-Brito","doi":"10.1186/s10195-024-00769-z","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s10195-024-00769-z","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Tibial plateau fractures involving posteromedial (PM) and posterolateral (PL) columns are complex injuries that require an appropriate approach. The management of the PL column in these cases can be controversial, and limitations using deep posteromedial interval approaches have been referenced. In this paper, a modification of the Lobenhoffer approach, designed to optimize the access to the PL column, is described in detail. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of this approach in a cadaveric anatomical study.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In total, five fresh-frozen cadaveric specimens were used for detailed anatomical study surrounding the approach. Relationships with cutaneous and deep neurovascular structures were evaluated. The exposure area of the PL and PM columns using this approach was assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The cadaveric study showed safe and adequate exposure. Oblique skin and fascia incision just medial to the posterior midline was safe to protect the medial sural cutaneous nerve and the small saphenous vein. Elevation of the popliteus and tibialis posterior muscles offered safe protection of the anterior tibial artery and popliteal neurovascular bundle during retractor placement. Adequate full proximal exposure of the PM and PL columns, including the posterolateral lateral (PLL) and posterolateral central (PLC) segments, was obtained in all specimens.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Modified Oblique Lobenhoffer (MOL) approach can be a feasible option to access PL and PM columns in tibial plateau fractures.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>IV.</p>","PeriodicalId":48603,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology","volume":"25 1","pages":"27"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2024-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11106229/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141072124","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-05-18DOI: 10.1186/s10195-024-00767-1
Tiziana Ascione, Giovanni Balato, Pasquale Pagliano
Total joint arthroplasty is the recommended treatment for patients with end-stage osteoarthritis, as it reduces disability and pain and restores joint function. However, prosthetic joint infection is a serious complication of this procedure, with the two-stage exchange being the most common treatment method. While there is consensus on diagnosing prosthetic joint infection, there is a lack of agreement on the parameters that can guide the surgeon in performing definitive reimplantation in a two-stage procedure. One approach that has been suggested to improve the accuracy of microbiologic investigations before definitive reimplantation is to observe a holiday period from antibiotic therapy to improve the accuracy of cultures from periprosthetic tissues, but these cultures report some degree of aspecificity. Therefore, several pieces of evidence highlight that performing reimplantation using continuous antibiotic therapy should be considered a safe and effective approach, leading to higher cure rates and a shorter period of disability. Dosage of C-reactive protein (CRP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ERS) and D-dimer are helpful in diagnosing prosthetic joint infection, but only D-dimer has shown sufficient accuracy in predicting the risk of infection recurrence after a two-stage procedure. Synovial fluid analysis before reimplantation has been shown to be the most accurate in predicting recurrence, and new cutoff values for leukocyte count and neutrophil percentage have shown a useful predictive rule to identify patients at risk of unfavourable outcome. A new scoring system based on a numerical score calculated from the beta coefficient derived through multivariate analysis of D-dimer levels, synovial fluid leukocytes and relative neutrophils percentage has demonstrated high accuracy when it comes to guiding the second step of two-stage procedure. In conclusion, reimplantation may be a suitable option for patients who are on continuous therapy without local symptoms, and with CRP and ERS within the normal range, with low synovial fluid leukocytes (< 952/mL) and a low relative neutrophil percentage (< 52%) and D-dimer below 1100 µg/mL. A numerical score derived from analysing these three parameters can serve as a valuable tool in determining the feasibility of reimplantation in these patients.
全关节成形术是骨关节炎晚期患者的推荐治疗方法，因为它可以减少残疾和疼痛，恢复关节功能。然而，人工关节感染是该手术的严重并发症，两阶段交换是最常见的治疗方法。虽然对假体关节感染的诊断已达成共识，但对指导外科医生在两阶段手术中进行明确再植的参数却缺乏一致意见。为提高确定性再植手术前微生物检查的准确性，有人提出了一种方法，即观察抗生素治疗的休止期，以提高假体周围组织培养的准确性，但这些培养报告了一定程度的非特异性。因此，有多项证据表明，使用持续抗生素治疗进行再植应被视为一种安全有效的方法，可提高治愈率并缩短致残时间。C反应蛋白（CRP）、红细胞沉降率（ERS）和D-二聚体的剂量有助于诊断人工关节感染，但只有D-二聚体在预测两阶段手术后感染复发的风险方面显示出足够的准确性。事实证明，再植手术前的滑膜液分析在预测复发方面最为准确，而白细胞计数和中性粒细胞百分比的新截断值则显示出一种有用的预测规则，可用于识别有不良后果风险的患者。通过对 D-二聚体水平、滑膜液白细胞和相对中性粒细胞百分比进行多变量分析，得出β系数，并根据β系数计算出一个新的评分系统，该评分系统在指导两阶段手术的第二步时显示出很高的准确性。总之，对于正在接受持续治疗且无局部症状、CRP 和 ERS 均在正常范围内、滑膜液白细胞较低的患者来说，再植手术可能是一个合适的选择。
{"title":"Upcoming evidence in clinical practice of two-stage revision arthroplasty for prosthetic joint infection.","authors":"Tiziana Ascione, Giovanni Balato, Pasquale Pagliano","doi":"10.1186/s10195-024-00767-1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s10195-024-00767-1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Total joint arthroplasty is the recommended treatment for patients with end-stage osteoarthritis, as it reduces disability and pain and restores joint function. However, prosthetic joint infection is a serious complication of this procedure, with the two-stage exchange being the most common treatment method. While there is consensus on diagnosing prosthetic joint infection, there is a lack of agreement on the parameters that can guide the surgeon in performing definitive reimplantation in a two-stage procedure. One approach that has been suggested to improve the accuracy of microbiologic investigations before definitive reimplantation is to observe a holiday period from antibiotic therapy to improve the accuracy of cultures from periprosthetic tissues, but these cultures report some degree of aspecificity. Therefore, several pieces of evidence highlight that performing reimplantation using continuous antibiotic therapy should be considered a safe and effective approach, leading to higher cure rates and a shorter period of disability. Dosage of C-reactive protein (CRP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ERS) and D-dimer are helpful in diagnosing prosthetic joint infection, but only D-dimer has shown sufficient accuracy in predicting the risk of infection recurrence after a two-stage procedure. Synovial fluid analysis before reimplantation has been shown to be the most accurate in predicting recurrence, and new cutoff values for leukocyte count and neutrophil percentage have shown a useful predictive rule to identify patients at risk of unfavourable outcome. A new scoring system based on a numerical score calculated from the beta coefficient derived through multivariate analysis of D-dimer levels, synovial fluid leukocytes and relative neutrophils percentage has demonstrated high accuracy when it comes to guiding the second step of two-stage procedure. In conclusion, reimplantation may be a suitable option for patients who are on continuous therapy without local symptoms, and with CRP and ERS within the normal range, with low synovial fluid leukocytes (< 952/mL) and a low relative neutrophil percentage (< 52%) and D-dimer below 1100 µg/mL. A numerical score derived from analysing these three parameters can serve as a valuable tool in determining the feasibility of reimplantation in these patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":48603,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology","volume":"25 1","pages":"26"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2024-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140959614","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-05-10DOI: 10.1186/s10195-024-00766-2
Geert Meermans, David Fawley, Luigi Zagra, René H M Ten Broeke, Kory Johnson, Thierry Bernard, Henry Clayton Thomason
Background: Acetabular cup positioning in total hip arthroplasty (THA) is closely related to outcomes. The literature has suggested cup parameters defined by the Lewinnek safe zone; however, the validity of such measures is in question. Several studies have raised concerns about the benefits of using the Lewinnek safe zone as a predictor of success. In this study we elected to use prospective surgeon targets as the basis for comparison to see how successful surgeons are positioning their cup using standard instruments and techniques.
Methods: A prospective, global, multicenter study was conducted. Cup positioning success was defined as a composite endpoint. Both cup inclination and version needed to be within 10° of the surgeon target to be considered a success. Radiographic analysis was conducted by a third-party reviewer.
Results: In 170 subjects, inclination, target versus actual, was 44.8° [standard deviation (SD 0.9°)] and 43.1° (SD 7.6°), respectively (p = 0.0029). Inclination was considered successful in 84.1% of cases. Mean version, target versus actual, was 19.4° (SD 3.9°) and 27.2° (SD 5.6°), respectively (p < 0.0001). Version was considered successful in 63.4% of cases, and combined position (inclination and version) was considered successful in 53.1%.
Conclusion: This study shows that with traditional methods of placing the cup intraoperatively, surgeons are only accurate 53.1% of the time compared with a predicted preoperative plan. This study suggests that the inconsistency in cup positioning based on the surgeon's planned target is potentially another important variable to consider while using a mechanical guide or in freehand techniques for cup placement in THA.
Trial registration: This study is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03189303.
{"title":"Accuracy of cup placement compared with preoperative surgeon targets in primary total hip arthroplasty using standard instrumentation and techniques: a global, multicenter study.","authors":"Geert Meermans, David Fawley, Luigi Zagra, René H M Ten Broeke, Kory Johnson, Thierry Bernard, Henry Clayton Thomason","doi":"10.1186/s10195-024-00766-2","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s10195-024-00766-2","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Acetabular cup positioning in total hip arthroplasty (THA) is closely related to outcomes. The literature has suggested cup parameters defined by the Lewinnek safe zone; however, the validity of such measures is in question. Several studies have raised concerns about the benefits of using the Lewinnek safe zone as a predictor of success. In this study we elected to use prospective surgeon targets as the basis for comparison to see how successful surgeons are positioning their cup using standard instruments and techniques.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective, global, multicenter study was conducted. Cup positioning success was defined as a composite endpoint. Both cup inclination and version needed to be within 10° of the surgeon target to be considered a success. Radiographic analysis was conducted by a third-party reviewer.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 170 subjects, inclination, target versus actual, was 44.8° [standard deviation (SD 0.9°)] and 43.1° (SD 7.6°), respectively (p = 0.0029). Inclination was considered successful in 84.1% of cases. Mean version, target versus actual, was 19.4° (SD 3.9°) and 27.2° (SD 5.6°), respectively (p < 0.0001). Version was considered successful in 63.4% of cases, and combined position (inclination and version) was considered successful in 53.1%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study shows that with traditional methods of placing the cup intraoperatively, surgeons are only accurate 53.1% of the time compared with a predicted preoperative plan. This study suggests that the inconsistency in cup positioning based on the surgeon's planned target is potentially another important variable to consider while using a mechanical guide or in freehand techniques for cup placement in THA.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>This study is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03189303.</p>","PeriodicalId":48603,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology","volume":"25 1","pages":"25"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2024-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11087417/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140899867","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-05-04DOI: 10.1186/s10195-024-00765-3
Gianluca Piovan, Luca De Berardinis, Daniele Screpis, Marco Senarighi, Lorenzo Povegliano, Simone Natali, Antonio Pompilio Gigante, Claudio Zorzi
This retrospective medium-term follow-up study compares the outcomes of medial fixed-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (mUKA) using a cemented metal-backed (MB) or an all-polyethylene (AP) tibial component. The database of our institution was mined for primary mUKA patients implanted with an MB or an AP tibial component (the MB-UKA and AP-UKA groups, respectively) from 2015 to 2018. We compared patient demographics, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), and motion analysis data obtained with the Riablo™ system (CoRehab, Trento, Italy). We conducted propensity-score-matching (PSM) analysis (1:1) using multiple variables. PSM analysis yielded 77 pairs of MB-UKA and AP-UKA patients. At 5 years, the physical component summary (PCS) score was 52.4 ± 8.3 in MB-UKA and 48.2 ± 8.3 in AP-UKA patients (p < 0.001). The Forgotten Joint Score (FJS-12) was 82.9 ± 18.8 in MB-UKAs and 73.4 ± 22.5 in AP-UKAs (p = 0.015). Tibial pain was reported by 7.8% of the MB-UKA and 35.1% of the AP-UKA patients (p < 0.001). Static postural sway was, respectively, 3.9 ± 2.1 cm and 5.4 ± 2.3 (p = 0.0002), and gait symmetry was, respectively, 92.7% ± 3.7 cm and 90.4% ± 5.4 cm (p = 0.006). Patient satisfaction was 9.2 ± 0.8 in the MB-UKA and 8.3 ± 2.0 in the AP-UKA group (p < 0.003). MB-UKA patients experienced significantly better 5-year static sway and gait symmetry outcomes than AP-UKA patients. Although the PROMs of the two groups overlapped, MB-UKA patients had a lower incidence of tibial pain, better FJS-12 and PCS scores, and were more satisfied.
{"title":"Metal-backed or all-poly tibial components: which are better for medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty? A propensity-score-matching retrospective study at the 5-year follow-up","authors":"Gianluca Piovan, Luca De Berardinis, Daniele Screpis, Marco Senarighi, Lorenzo Povegliano, Simone Natali, Antonio Pompilio Gigante, Claudio Zorzi","doi":"10.1186/s10195-024-00765-3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s10195-024-00765-3","url":null,"abstract":"This retrospective medium-term follow-up study compares the outcomes of medial fixed-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (mUKA) using a cemented metal-backed (MB) or an all-polyethylene (AP) tibial component. The database of our institution was mined for primary mUKA patients implanted with an MB or an AP tibial component (the MB-UKA and AP-UKA groups, respectively) from 2015 to 2018. We compared patient demographics, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), and motion analysis data obtained with the Riablo™ system (CoRehab, Trento, Italy). We conducted propensity-score-matching (PSM) analysis (1:1) using multiple variables. PSM analysis yielded 77 pairs of MB-UKA and AP-UKA patients. At 5 years, the physical component summary (PCS) score was 52.4 ± 8.3 in MB-UKA and 48.2 ± 8.3 in AP-UKA patients (p < 0.001). The Forgotten Joint Score (FJS-12) was 82.9 ± 18.8 in MB-UKAs and 73.4 ± 22.5 in AP-UKAs (p = 0.015). Tibial pain was reported by 7.8% of the MB-UKA and 35.1% of the AP-UKA patients (p < 0.001). Static postural sway was, respectively, 3.9 ± 2.1 cm and 5.4 ± 2.3 (p = 0.0002), and gait symmetry was, respectively, 92.7% ± 3.7 cm and 90.4% ± 5.4 cm (p = 0.006). Patient satisfaction was 9.2 ± 0.8 in the MB-UKA and 8.3 ± 2.0 in the AP-UKA group (p < 0.003). MB-UKA patients experienced significantly better 5-year static sway and gait symmetry outcomes than AP-UKA patients. Although the PROMs of the two groups overlapped, MB-UKA patients had a lower incidence of tibial pain, better FJS-12 and PCS scores, and were more satisfied.","PeriodicalId":48603,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2024-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140829329","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-04-23DOI: 10.1186/s10195-024-00760-8
Leonard Lisitano, Laura Wulff, Jürgen Schmidt, Christoph Sieland, Lutz Mahlke, Timon Röttinger, Jairo Cifuentes, Edgar Mayr, Kim Rau
The exact positioning of the cephalomedullary (CM) nail entry point for managing femoral fractures remains debatable, with significant implications for fracture reduction and postoperative complications. This study aimed to explore the variability in the selection of the entry point among trauma surgeons, hypothesizing potential differences and their association with surgeon experience. In this prospective multicenter study, 16 participants, ranging from residents to senior specialists, partook in a simulation wherein they determined the optimal entry point for the implantation of a proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFN-A; DePuy Synthes) in various femora. The inter- and intra-observer variability was calculated, along with comprehensive descriptive statistical analysis, to assess the variability in entry point selection and the impact of surgeon experience. In this study, the mean distance from the selected entry points to the calculated mean entry point was 3.98 mm, with a smaller distance observed among surgeons with more than 500 implantations (ANOVA, p = 0.050). Intra-surgeon variability for identical femora averaged at 5.14 mm, showing no significant differences across various levels of surgical experience or training. Notably, 13.6% of selected entry points would not allow a proper intramedullary positioning of the implant, thereby rendering anatomical repositioning unfeasible. Among these impossible entry points, a significant skew towards anterior placement was observed (70.6% of the impossible entry points), with a smaller fraction being overly lateral (27.5%) or medial (13.7%). On a patient level, the impossibility rate varied widely from 0 to 35% among the different femora examined, with a significantly higher rate seen in younger patients (mean age 55.02 versus 60.32; t-test for independent samples, p = 0.04). Significant variations exist in surgeons’ selection of entry points for proximal femoral nailing, underscoring the task’s complexity. Experience does not prevent the choice of unfeasible entry points, emphasizing the inadequacy of a universal approach and pointing towards the necessity for a patient-specific strategy for improved outcomes. Trial registration number: DRKS00032465.
{"title":"Unravelling variations: an examination of entry point selection in proximal femoral cephalomedullary nailing","authors":"Leonard Lisitano, Laura Wulff, Jürgen Schmidt, Christoph Sieland, Lutz Mahlke, Timon Röttinger, Jairo Cifuentes, Edgar Mayr, Kim Rau","doi":"10.1186/s10195-024-00760-8","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s10195-024-00760-8","url":null,"abstract":"The exact positioning of the cephalomedullary (CM) nail entry point for managing femoral fractures remains debatable, with significant implications for fracture reduction and postoperative complications. This study aimed to explore the variability in the selection of the entry point among trauma surgeons, hypothesizing potential differences and their association with surgeon experience. In this prospective multicenter study, 16 participants, ranging from residents to senior specialists, partook in a simulation wherein they determined the optimal entry point for the implantation of a proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFN-A; DePuy Synthes) in various femora. The inter- and intra-observer variability was calculated, along with comprehensive descriptive statistical analysis, to assess the variability in entry point selection and the impact of surgeon experience. In this study, the mean distance from the selected entry points to the calculated mean entry point was 3.98 mm, with a smaller distance observed among surgeons with more than 500 implantations (ANOVA, p = 0.050). Intra-surgeon variability for identical femora averaged at 5.14 mm, showing no significant differences across various levels of surgical experience or training. Notably, 13.6% of selected entry points would not allow a proper intramedullary positioning of the implant, thereby rendering anatomical repositioning unfeasible. Among these impossible entry points, a significant skew towards anterior placement was observed (70.6% of the impossible entry points), with a smaller fraction being overly lateral (27.5%) or medial (13.7%). On a patient level, the impossibility rate varied widely from 0 to 35% among the different femora examined, with a significantly higher rate seen in younger patients (mean age 55.02 versus 60.32; t-test for independent samples, p = 0.04). Significant variations exist in surgeons’ selection of entry points for proximal femoral nailing, underscoring the task’s complexity. Experience does not prevent the choice of unfeasible entry points, emphasizing the inadequacy of a universal approach and pointing towards the necessity for a patient-specific strategy for improved outcomes. Trial registration number: DRKS00032465. ","PeriodicalId":48603,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology","volume":"63 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2024-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140805745","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-04-23DOI: 10.1186/s10195-024-00762-6
Ahmed Abdel-Monem Dewidar, Mohamed Kamal Mesregah, Mustafa Mohamed Mesriga, Ahmed Mohamed El-Behiry
Management of uncontained medial proximal tibial defects during primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) can be challenging, especially for defects ≥ 10 mm in depth. This study sought to assess the outcomes of autogenous structural bone grafts to address these defects. In this prospective study, patients with uncontained medial proximal tibial defects ≥ 10 mm in depth undergoing TKA were managed by autogenous structural bone grafts fixed by screws and were followed up for at least 36 months. Patients were followed-up clinically with Knee Society Score (KSS) and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC). Additionally, radiological follow-up was done to assess bone graft union and implant stability. The study included 48 patients with a mean age of 69.2 ± 4.5 years. The mean body mass index (BMI) was 31.4 ± 3.7 kg/m2. The mean defect depth was 17 ± 3.6 mm. With a mean follow-up period of 52.2 ± 12.3 months, the median KSS improved significantly from 30 preoperatively to 89, P < 0.001. The median WOMAC score reduced significantly from 85 preoperatively to 30.5, P < 0.001. The mean ROM increased significantly from 73 ± 12.4 preoperatively to 124 ± 8.4 degrees, P < 0.001. The mean graft union time was 4.9 ± 1 months. No significant complications were reported. Autogenous bone graft reconstruction is a safe and effective method of addressing uncontained medial proximal tibial defects in primary TKA. Level IV.
{"title":"Autogenous structural bone graft reconstruction of ≥ 10-mm-deep uncontained medial proximal tibial defects in primary total knee arthroplasty","authors":"Ahmed Abdel-Monem Dewidar, Mohamed Kamal Mesregah, Mustafa Mohamed Mesriga, Ahmed Mohamed El-Behiry","doi":"10.1186/s10195-024-00762-6","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s10195-024-00762-6","url":null,"abstract":"Management of uncontained medial proximal tibial defects during primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) can be challenging, especially for defects ≥ 10 mm in depth. This study sought to assess the outcomes of autogenous structural bone grafts to address these defects. In this prospective study, patients with uncontained medial proximal tibial defects ≥ 10 mm in depth undergoing TKA were managed by autogenous structural bone grafts fixed by screws and were followed up for at least 36 months. Patients were followed-up clinically with Knee Society Score (KSS) and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC). Additionally, radiological follow-up was done to assess bone graft union and implant stability. The study included 48 patients with a mean age of 69.2 ± 4.5 years. The mean body mass index (BMI) was 31.4 ± 3.7 kg/m2. The mean defect depth was 17 ± 3.6 mm. With a mean follow-up period of 52.2 ± 12.3 months, the median KSS improved significantly from 30 preoperatively to 89, P < 0.001. The median WOMAC score reduced significantly from 85 preoperatively to 30.5, P < 0.001. The mean ROM increased significantly from 73 ± 12.4 preoperatively to 124 ± 8.4 degrees, P < 0.001. The mean graft union time was 4.9 ± 1 months. No significant complications were reported. Autogenous bone graft reconstruction is a safe and effective method of addressing uncontained medial proximal tibial defects in primary TKA. Level IV.","PeriodicalId":48603,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2024-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140805698","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-04-18DOI: 10.1186/s10195-024-00756-4
Wael Mohamed Safwat Sadek, Ibrahim Khairy Fayed Elshamly, Moustafa Saladin Mohammed Salem, Wessam Gamal AbouSenna, Emad Ebeid, Walid Atef Ebeid
Osteosarcoma is the most common primary bone malignancy in skeletally immature patients. The proximal humerus is the third most common site of osteosarcoma. The literature shows a paucity of published data concerning the outcome of proximal humerus osteosarcoma managed by limb salvage. The purpose of this study was to answer the following questions: (1) do patients with proximal humerus osteosarcoma managed by limb salvage and neoadjuvant chemotherapy show good functional and oncological outcomes, and (2) are there any prognostic factors that are associated with better oncological and functional outcomes? The study was a retrospective case series study assessing the overall outcome of 34 patients with proximal humerus osteosarcoma. Eighteen patients were males (53%) while 16 were females. Biological reconstruction was done in 15 patients (44%), while nonbiological reconstruction was done in 19 patients. Resections were mainly intraarticular (82%). Functional outcome was assessed using the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) score, while oncological outcome was assessed based on local recurrence and development of chest metastasis. Comparisons between quantitative variables were done using the nonparametric Mann–Whitney test. To compare categorical data, the chi-square (χ2) test was performed. The exact test was used instead when the expected frequency was less than 5. Correlations between quantitative variables were examined using the Spearman correlation coefficient. The mean MSTS score was 25.5 (range 23–29). A younger age was statistically correlated with a poorer MSTS score (P = 0.0016). Six patients out of 34 (17.6%) had local recurrence and four of them (67%) were treated by forequarter amputation. 41% of patients developed chest metastasis, and the majority of them were treated by chemotherapy (71%). In comparison with patients with osteosarcoma at other sites who were also managed in our institution, proximal humerus osteosarcoma patients showed higher incidence rates of local recurrence and chest metastasis along with lower 5-year patient and limb survivorships compared to distal femur, proximal tibia and proximal femur osteosarcoma patients. Treatment of osteosarcoma of the proximal humerus by limb salvage and chemotherapy yields a good functional outcome. The method of reconstruction does not impact the resultant function. The 5-year survivorship of these patients is 65%. Younger patients have a better oncological outcome and an inferior functional outcome. Level IV therapeutic study.
{"title":"Functional and oncological outcomes of patients with proximal humerus osteosarcoma managed by limb salvage","authors":"Wael Mohamed Safwat Sadek, Ibrahim Khairy Fayed Elshamly, Moustafa Saladin Mohammed Salem, Wessam Gamal AbouSenna, Emad Ebeid, Walid Atef Ebeid","doi":"10.1186/s10195-024-00756-4","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s10195-024-00756-4","url":null,"abstract":"Osteosarcoma is the most common primary bone malignancy in skeletally immature patients. The proximal humerus is the third most common site of osteosarcoma. The literature shows a paucity of published data concerning the outcome of proximal humerus osteosarcoma managed by limb salvage. The purpose of this study was to answer the following questions: (1) do patients with proximal humerus osteosarcoma managed by limb salvage and neoadjuvant chemotherapy show good functional and oncological outcomes, and (2) are there any prognostic factors that are associated with better oncological and functional outcomes? The study was a retrospective case series study assessing the overall outcome of 34 patients with proximal humerus osteosarcoma. Eighteen patients were males (53%) while 16 were females. Biological reconstruction was done in 15 patients (44%), while nonbiological reconstruction was done in 19 patients. Resections were mainly intraarticular (82%). Functional outcome was assessed using the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) score, while oncological outcome was assessed based on local recurrence and development of chest metastasis. Comparisons between quantitative variables were done using the nonparametric Mann–Whitney test. To compare categorical data, the chi-square (χ2) test was performed. The exact test was used instead when the expected frequency was less than 5. Correlations between quantitative variables were examined using the Spearman correlation coefficient. The mean MSTS score was 25.5 (range 23–29). A younger age was statistically correlated with a poorer MSTS score (P = 0.0016). Six patients out of 34 (17.6%) had local recurrence and four of them (67%) were treated by forequarter amputation. 41% of patients developed chest metastasis, and the majority of them were treated by chemotherapy (71%). In comparison with patients with osteosarcoma at other sites who were also managed in our institution, proximal humerus osteosarcoma patients showed higher incidence rates of local recurrence and chest metastasis along with lower 5-year patient and limb survivorships compared to distal femur, proximal tibia and proximal femur osteosarcoma patients. Treatment of osteosarcoma of the proximal humerus by limb salvage and chemotherapy yields a good functional outcome. The method of reconstruction does not impact the resultant function. The 5-year survivorship of these patients is 65%. Younger patients have a better oncological outcome and an inferior functional outcome. Level IV therapeutic study.","PeriodicalId":48603,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2024-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140624142","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-04-18DOI: 10.1186/s10195-024-00763-5
Fangzhou Lu, Rald V. M. Groven, Martijn van Griensven, Martijn Poeze, Jan A. P. Geurts, Shan Shan Qiu, Taco J. Blokhuis
Treating tibial non-unions efficiently presents a challenge for orthopaedic trauma surgeons. The established gold standard involves implanting autologous bone graft with adequate fixation, but the addition of biologicals according to the so-called diamond concept has become increasingly popular in the treatment of non-unions. Previous studies have indicated that polytherapy, which involves implanting mesenchymal stem cells, bioactive factors and osteoconductive scaffolds, can improve bone healing. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of polytherapy compared with monotherapy in treating tibial non-unions of varying severity. Data from consecutive tibial non-unions treated between November 2014 and July 2023 were retrospectively analysed. The Non Union Scoring System (NUSS) score before non-union surgery, and the Radiographic Union Score for Tibial fractures (RUST), scored at 1, 3, 6, 9, 12 and 18 months post-surgery, were recorded. Initially, a comparison was made between the polytherapy and monotherapy groups. Subsequently, patients receiving additional surgical non-union treatment were documented, and the frequency of these treatments was tallied for a subsequent per-treatment analysis. A total of 34 patients were included and divided into a polytherapy group (n = 15) and a monotherapy group (n = 19). The polytherapy group demonstrated a higher NUSS score (44 (39, 52) versus 32 (29, 43), P = 0.019, z = −2.347) and a tendency towards a higher success rate (93% versus 68%, P = 0.104) compared with the monotherapy group. For the per-treatment analysis, 44 treatments were divided into the polytherapy per-treatment group (n = 20) and the monotherapy per-treatment group (n = 24). The polytherapy per-treatment group exhibited a higher NUSS score (48 (43, 60) versus 38 (30, 50), P = 0.030, z = −2.173) and a higher success rate (95% versus 58%, P = 0.006) than the monotherapy per-treatment group. Within the monotherapy per-treatment group, the NUSS score displayed excellent predictive performance (AUC = 0.9143). Setting the threshold value at 48, the sensitivity and specificity were 100.0% and 70.0%, respectively. Polytherapy is more effective than monotherapy for severe tibial non-unions, offering a higher success ratio. The NUSS score supports decision-making in treating tibial non-unions. Level III.
{"title":"Polytherapy versus monotherapy in the treatment of tibial non-unions: a retrospective study","authors":"Fangzhou Lu, Rald V. M. Groven, Martijn van Griensven, Martijn Poeze, Jan A. P. Geurts, Shan Shan Qiu, Taco J. Blokhuis","doi":"10.1186/s10195-024-00763-5","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s10195-024-00763-5","url":null,"abstract":"Treating tibial non-unions efficiently presents a challenge for orthopaedic trauma surgeons. The established gold standard involves implanting autologous bone graft with adequate fixation, but the addition of biologicals according to the so-called diamond concept has become increasingly popular in the treatment of non-unions. Previous studies have indicated that polytherapy, which involves implanting mesenchymal stem cells, bioactive factors and osteoconductive scaffolds, can improve bone healing. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of polytherapy compared with monotherapy in treating tibial non-unions of varying severity. Data from consecutive tibial non-unions treated between November 2014 and July 2023 were retrospectively analysed. The Non Union Scoring System (NUSS) score before non-union surgery, and the Radiographic Union Score for Tibial fractures (RUST), scored at 1, 3, 6, 9, 12 and 18 months post-surgery, were recorded. Initially, a comparison was made between the polytherapy and monotherapy groups. Subsequently, patients receiving additional surgical non-union treatment were documented, and the frequency of these treatments was tallied for a subsequent per-treatment analysis. A total of 34 patients were included and divided into a polytherapy group (n = 15) and a monotherapy group (n = 19). The polytherapy group demonstrated a higher NUSS score (44 (39, 52) versus 32 (29, 43), P = 0.019, z = −2.347) and a tendency towards a higher success rate (93% versus 68%, P = 0.104) compared with the monotherapy group. For the per-treatment analysis, 44 treatments were divided into the polytherapy per-treatment group (n = 20) and the monotherapy per-treatment group (n = 24). The polytherapy per-treatment group exhibited a higher NUSS score (48 (43, 60) versus 38 (30, 50), P = 0.030, z = −2.173) and a higher success rate (95% versus 58%, P = 0.006) than the monotherapy per-treatment group. Within the monotherapy per-treatment group, the NUSS score displayed excellent predictive performance (AUC = 0.9143). Setting the threshold value at 48, the sensitivity and specificity were 100.0% and 70.0%, respectively. Polytherapy is more effective than monotherapy for severe tibial non-unions, offering a higher success ratio. The NUSS score supports decision-making in treating tibial non-unions. Level III.","PeriodicalId":48603,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology","volume":"118 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2024-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140624197","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-04-18DOI: 10.1186/s10195-024-00764-4
Arno A. Macken, Geert Alexander Buijze, Michael Kimmeyer, Tilman Hees, Denise Eygendaal, Michel van den Bekerom, Laurent Lafosse, Thibault Lafosse
This study aims to compare the range of motion (ROM) of reverse shoulder arthroplasty lateralised by bony increased offset (BIO-RSA) using a standard 38-mm (mm) component to regular reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) lateralised by using a 42-mm glenoid component. The secondary aims are to compare patient-reported and radiographic outcomes between the two groups. All patients with a BIO-RSA and size 38 glenosphere were retrospectively identified and matched to patients with a regular RSA and size 42 glenosphere. Matched patients were invited for a follow-up visit. ROM was assessed as well as radiographic outcomes (lateralisation, distalisation, inferior overhang, scapular notching, heterotopic bone formation, radiolucency, stress shielding, bone graft healing and viability and complications) and patient-reported outcomes (subjective shoulder value, Constant score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, activities of daily living which require internal rotation, activities of daily living which require external rotation and a visual analogue scale for pain). Outcomes were compared between the two groups. In total, 38 BIO-RSAs with a size 38 glenosphere were matched to 38 regular RSAs with a size 42 glenosphere. Of the 76 matched patients, 74 could be contacted and 70 (95%) were included. At the final follow-up, there were no differences between the two groups in ROM, patient-reported outcomes or radiographic outcomes (p > 0.485). Using a larger glenosphere is a feasible alternative to BIO-RSA for lateralising RSA, providing comparable ROM, patient-reported and radiographic results, while potentially decreasing costs, operative time and complication rates. Level of evidence III.
{"title":"Lateralising reverse shoulder arthroplasty using bony increased offset (BIO-RSA) or increasing glenoid component diameter: comparison of clinical, radiographic and patient reported outcomes in a matched cohort","authors":"Arno A. Macken, Geert Alexander Buijze, Michael Kimmeyer, Tilman Hees, Denise Eygendaal, Michel van den Bekerom, Laurent Lafosse, Thibault Lafosse","doi":"10.1186/s10195-024-00764-4","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s10195-024-00764-4","url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to compare the range of motion (ROM) of reverse shoulder arthroplasty lateralised by bony increased offset (BIO-RSA) using a standard 38-mm (mm) component to regular reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) lateralised by using a 42-mm glenoid component. The secondary aims are to compare patient-reported and radiographic outcomes between the two groups. All patients with a BIO-RSA and size 38 glenosphere were retrospectively identified and matched to patients with a regular RSA and size 42 glenosphere. Matched patients were invited for a follow-up visit. ROM was assessed as well as radiographic outcomes (lateralisation, distalisation, inferior overhang, scapular notching, heterotopic bone formation, radiolucency, stress shielding, bone graft healing and viability and complications) and patient-reported outcomes (subjective shoulder value, Constant score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, activities of daily living which require internal rotation, activities of daily living which require external rotation and a visual analogue scale for pain). Outcomes were compared between the two groups. In total, 38 BIO-RSAs with a size 38 glenosphere were matched to 38 regular RSAs with a size 42 glenosphere. Of the 76 matched patients, 74 could be contacted and 70 (95%) were included. At the final follow-up, there were no differences between the two groups in ROM, patient-reported outcomes or radiographic outcomes (p > 0.485). Using a larger glenosphere is a feasible alternative to BIO-RSA for lateralising RSA, providing comparable ROM, patient-reported and radiographic results, while potentially decreasing costs, operative time and complication rates. Level of evidence III.","PeriodicalId":48603,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology","volume":"46 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2024-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140624447","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号