首页 > 最新文献

Journal of Anthropological Sciences最新文献

英文 中文
Reflections on "race" in science and society in Germany. 德国科学与社会对“种族”的反思。
IF 1.8 2区 社会学 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY Pub Date : 2017-12-30 Epub Date: 2017-07-10 DOI: 10.4436/JASS.95010
Ulrich Kattmann
The purpose of this article is to show how race and racism are treated in Germany in science as well as in the public discourse. It will be demonstrated that these debates are influenced by the history of biological anthropology (on the one hand) and (on the other hand) the history of Germany up to the current political situation there is influenced by the immigration of refugees mainly from Asia Minor and Africa. In the article, I will consider the central questions Alan Goodman put in his survey of the reflections on “race” in the US:
{"title":"Reflections on \"race\" in science and society in Germany.","authors":"Ulrich Kattmann","doi":"10.4436/JASS.95010","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4436/JASS.95010","url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this article is to show how race and racism are treated in Germany in science as well as in the public discourse. It will be demonstrated that these debates are influenced by the history of biological anthropology (on the one hand) and (on the other hand) the history of Germany up to the current political situation there is influenced by the immigration of refugees mainly from Asia Minor and Africa. In the article, I will consider the central questions Alan Goodman put in his survey of the reflections on “race” in the US:","PeriodicalId":48668,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anthropological Sciences","volume":"95 ","pages":"311-318"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2017-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"35158269","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Observations on race and racism in Greece. 对希腊种族和种族主义的看法。
IF 1.8 2区 社会学 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY Pub Date : 2017-12-30 Epub Date: 2017-07-13 DOI: 10.4436/JASS.95013
Ageliki Lefkaditou
{"title":"Observations on race and racism in Greece.","authors":"Ageliki Lefkaditou","doi":"10.4436/JASS.95013","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4436/JASS.95013","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":48668,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anthropological Sciences","volume":"95 ","pages":"329-338"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2017-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"35168484","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Form and function in the Lower Palaeolithic: history, progress, and continued relevance. 旧石器时代晚期的形式和功能:历史、进展和持续的相关性。
IF 1.8 2区 社会学 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY Pub Date : 2017-12-30 Epub Date: 2017-07-31 DOI: 10.4436/JASS.95017
Alastair Key, Lycett Stephen

Percussively flaked stone artefacts constitute a major source of evidence relating to hominin behavioural strategies and are, essentially, a product or byproduct of a past individual's decision to create a tool with respect to some broader goal. Moreover, it has long been noted that both differences and recurrent regularities exist within and between Palaeolithic stone artefact forms. Accordingly, archaeologists have frequently drawn links between form and functionality, with functional objectives and performance often being regarded consequential to a stone tool's morphological properties. Despite these factors, extensive reviews of the related concepts of form and function with respect to the Lower Palaeolithic remain surprisingly sparse. We attempt to redress this issue. First we stress the historical place of form-function concepts, and their role in establishing basic ideas that echo to this day. We then highlight methodological and conceptual progress in determining artefactual function in more recent years. Thereafter, we evaluate four specific issues that are of direct consequence for evaluating the ongoing relevance of form-function concepts, especially with respect to their relevance for understanding human evolution more generally. Our discussion highlights specifically how recent developments have been able to build on a long historical legacy, and demonstrate that direct, indirect, experimental, and evolutionary perspectives intersect in crucial ways, with each providing specific but essential insights for ongoing questions. We conclude by emphasising that our understanding of these issues and their interaction, has been, and will be, essential to accurately interpret the Lower Palaeolithic archaeological record, tool-form related behaviours of Lower Palaeolithic hominins, and their consequences for (and relationship to) wider questions of human evolution.

敲击式剥落的石质人工制品是人类行为策略的主要证据来源,从本质上讲,是过去的个体为了实现更广泛的目标而创造工具的决定的产物或副产品。此外,人们早就注意到,旧石器时代的石头人工制品形式内部和之间存在差异和循环规律。因此,考古学家经常在形式和功能之间建立联系,功能目标和性能通常被认为是石器形态特性的结果。尽管有这些因素,关于旧石器时代晚期的形式和功能的相关概念的广泛评论仍然令人惊讶地稀少。我们试图解决这个问题。首先,我们强调形式-功能概念的历史地位,以及它们在建立至今仍然存在的基本思想方面所起的作用。然后,我们强调了近年来在确定人工功能方面的方法和概念进展。此后,我们评估了四个具体问题,这些问题对评估形式-功能概念的持续相关性具有直接影响,特别是与它们对更普遍地理解人类进化的相关性有关。我们的讨论特别强调了最近的发展如何能够建立在悠久的历史遗产之上,并证明了直接、间接、实验和进化的观点以至关重要的方式相交,每种观点都为正在进行的问题提供了具体但重要的见解。最后,我们强调,我们对这些问题及其相互作用的理解,对于准确解释下旧石器时代的考古记录,下旧石器时代人类的工具形式相关行为,以及它们对人类进化更广泛问题的影响(和关系)至关重要。
{"title":"Form and function in the Lower Palaeolithic: history, progress, and continued relevance.","authors":"Alastair Key,&nbsp;Lycett Stephen","doi":"10.4436/JASS.95017","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4436/JASS.95017","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Percussively flaked stone artefacts constitute a major source of evidence relating to hominin behavioural strategies and are, essentially, a product or byproduct of a past individual's decision to create a tool with respect to some broader goal. Moreover, it has long been noted that both differences and recurrent regularities exist within and between Palaeolithic stone artefact forms. Accordingly, archaeologists have frequently drawn links between form and functionality, with functional objectives and performance often being regarded consequential to a stone tool's morphological properties. Despite these factors, extensive reviews of the related concepts of form and function with respect to the Lower Palaeolithic remain surprisingly sparse. We attempt to redress this issue. First we stress the historical place of form-function concepts, and their role in establishing basic ideas that echo to this day. We then highlight methodological and conceptual progress in determining artefactual function in more recent years. Thereafter, we evaluate four specific issues that are of direct consequence for evaluating the ongoing relevance of form-function concepts, especially with respect to their relevance for understanding human evolution more generally. Our discussion highlights specifically how recent developments have been able to build on a long historical legacy, and demonstrate that direct, indirect, experimental, and evolutionary perspectives intersect in crucial ways, with each providing specific but essential insights for ongoing questions. We conclude by emphasising that our understanding of these issues and their interaction, has been, and will be, essential to accurately interpret the Lower Palaeolithic archaeological record, tool-form related behaviours of Lower Palaeolithic hominins, and their consequences for (and relationship to) wider questions of human evolution.</p>","PeriodicalId":48668,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anthropological Sciences","volume":"95 ","pages":"67-108"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2017-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"35366699","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 42
A Cover Story for a Nature cover: genetic signature of human expansions into Eurasia revealed by a panel of worldwide high coverage genomes. 《自然》杂志封面故事:一组全球高覆盖率基因组揭示了人类向欧亚大陆扩张的基因特征。
IF 1.8 2区 社会学 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY Pub Date : 2017-12-30 Epub Date: 2017-08-07 DOI: 10.4436/JASS.95019
Luca Pagani
{"title":"A Cover Story for a Nature cover: genetic signature of human expansions into Eurasia revealed by a panel of worldwide high coverage genomes.","authors":"Luca Pagani","doi":"10.4436/JASS.95019","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4436/JASS.95019","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":48668,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anthropological Sciences","volume":"95 ","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2017-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"35250567","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19
Tracking the evolution of causal cognition in humans. 追踪人类因果认知的进化。
IF 1.8 2区 社会学 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY Pub Date : 2017-12-30 Epub Date: 2017-05-08 DOI: 10.4436/JASS.95006
Marlize Lombard, Peter Gärdenfors

We suggest a seven-grade model for the evolution of causal cognition as a framework that can be used to gauge variation in the complexity of causal reasoning from the panin-hominin split until the appearance of cognitively modern hunter-gatherer communities. The intention is to put forward a cohesive model for the evolution of causal cognition in humans, which can be assessed against increasingly fine-grained empirical data from the palaeoanthropological and archaeological records. We propose that the tracking behaviour (i.e., the ability to interpret and follow external, inanimate, visual clues of hominins) provides a rich case study for tracing the evolution of causal cognition in our lineage. The grades of causal cognition are tentatively linked to aspects of the Stone Age/Palaeolithic archaeological record. Our model can also be applied to current work in evolutionary psychology and research on causal cognition, so that an inter-disciplinary understanding and correlation of processes becomes increasingly possible.

我们提出了一个因果认知进化的7级模型,作为一个框架,可以用来衡量因果推理复杂性的变化,从panin-hominin分裂到认知现代狩猎-采集社区的出现。其目的是为人类因果认知的进化提出一个有凝聚力的模型,该模型可以根据来自古人类学和考古记录的越来越细粒度的经验数据进行评估。我们认为,追踪行为(即解释和跟踪人类外部无生命的视觉线索的能力)为追踪人类谱系中因果认知的进化提供了丰富的案例研究。因果认知的等级暂时与石器时代/旧石器时代考古记录的各个方面联系在一起。我们的模型也可以应用到进化心理学和因果认知的研究中,从而使跨学科的理解和过程的关联变得越来越可能。
{"title":"Tracking the evolution of causal cognition in humans.","authors":"Marlize Lombard,&nbsp;Peter Gärdenfors","doi":"10.4436/JASS.95006","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4436/JASS.95006","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We suggest a seven-grade model for the evolution of causal cognition as a framework that can be used to gauge variation in the complexity of causal reasoning from the panin-hominin split until the appearance of cognitively modern hunter-gatherer communities. The intention is to put forward a cohesive model for the evolution of causal cognition in humans, which can be assessed against increasingly fine-grained empirical data from the palaeoanthropological and archaeological records. We propose that the tracking behaviour (i.e., the ability to interpret and follow external, inanimate, visual clues of hominins) provides a rich case study for tracing the evolution of causal cognition in our lineage. The grades of causal cognition are tentatively linked to aspects of the Stone Age/Palaeolithic archaeological record. Our model can also be applied to current work in evolutionary psychology and research on causal cognition, so that an inter-disciplinary understanding and correlation of processes becomes increasingly possible.</p>","PeriodicalId":48668,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anthropological Sciences","volume":"95 ","pages":"219-234"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2017-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"34982172","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 27
Race and racism in France. 法国的种族和种族主义。
IF 1.8 2区 社会学 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY Pub Date : 2017-12-30 Epub Date: 2017-07-10 DOI: 10.4436/JASS.95009
Evelyne Heyer
The Musée de l’Homme in Paris, has chosen for his first big temporary exhibition after reopening in October 2015, to address the question of racism. The exhibition is entitled: Us and them – from prejudices to racism (http://nousetlesautres.museedelhomme.fr/en). I am the scientific commissioner with my colleague Carole Reynaud-Paligot, an historian. What is racism? Why does it exist? Are all humans racist? In recent years, social psychologists, geneticists and researchers in the humanities and social sciences have explored issues relating to alterity and racism. This exhibition draws on their research and more, from France and throughout the world to produce an original analysis of the phenomena of racialization, both in the past and today, which emphasizes not only the widely known facts but also how these phenomena were constructed. Before answering the questions raised by Alan Goodman, it is important to situate racism in France. French racism is not limited to biological-racism i.e. racism based on the idea of races defined by biological criteria. Indeed, biologicalracism is one of the different forms of racisms that exist. This goes back at least to XXth century history: after the second world war, Anglo-Saxon countries (primarily the UK and USA) focused on the question of discriminations in relation to skin color, while in France anti-racism was mostly taken care of by different associations who have been created to fight anti-Semitism (see the work of Bleich, 2003). So that when we talk about racism, it is not limited to biological-racism, but includes racisms based on culture or religion that are also “essentialized”. Therefore we have chosen the following definition for racism: “being racist is to regard the differences between individuals, be they physical, cultural or moral, as hereditary, immutable and “natural”. Racism establishes a hierarchy of categories of human beings, and this can lead to practices ranging from discrimination through to extermination.” This definition encompasses different form of racisms either based on a biological or a cultural criterion. Our definition is based on three key components: categorization, hierarchization and essentialization. Categorization is a mental operation that simplifies the world. People classify individuals based on their appearance, their religion, their geographical origin, etc. The criteria used to differentiate people vary according to the particular society and period. Such “categories” are neither natural nor fixed. Hierarchization involves a value judgment based on regarding one group or category of individuals as being superior or inferior to another. Essentialization is a process by which individuals are reduced to moral characteristics, intellectual faculties or psychological traits alleged to be an immutable and inherited feature of that particular group. Having presented the stage for France, the following directly address the questions posed by Alan Goodman.
{"title":"Race and racism in France.","authors":"Evelyne Heyer","doi":"10.4436/JASS.95009","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4436/JASS.95009","url":null,"abstract":"The Musée de l’Homme in Paris, has chosen for his first big temporary exhibition after reopening in October 2015, to address the question of racism. The exhibition is entitled: Us and them – from prejudices to racism (http://nousetlesautres.museedelhomme.fr/en). I am the scientific commissioner with my colleague Carole Reynaud-Paligot, an historian. What is racism? Why does it exist? Are all humans racist? In recent years, social psychologists, geneticists and researchers in the humanities and social sciences have explored issues relating to alterity and racism. This exhibition draws on their research and more, from France and throughout the world to produce an original analysis of the phenomena of racialization, both in the past and today, which emphasizes not only the widely known facts but also how these phenomena were constructed. Before answering the questions raised by Alan Goodman, it is important to situate racism in France. French racism is not limited to biological-racism i.e. racism based on the idea of races defined by biological criteria. Indeed, biologicalracism is one of the different forms of racisms that exist. This goes back at least to XXth century history: after the second world war, Anglo-Saxon countries (primarily the UK and USA) focused on the question of discriminations in relation to skin color, while in France anti-racism was mostly taken care of by different associations who have been created to fight anti-Semitism (see the work of Bleich, 2003). So that when we talk about racism, it is not limited to biological-racism, but includes racisms based on culture or religion that are also “essentialized”. Therefore we have chosen the following definition for racism: “being racist is to regard the differences between individuals, be they physical, cultural or moral, as hereditary, immutable and “natural”. Racism establishes a hierarchy of categories of human beings, and this can lead to practices ranging from discrimination through to extermination.” This definition encompasses different form of racisms either based on a biological or a cultural criterion. Our definition is based on three key components: categorization, hierarchization and essentialization. Categorization is a mental operation that simplifies the world. People classify individuals based on their appearance, their religion, their geographical origin, etc. The criteria used to differentiate people vary according to the particular society and period. Such “categories” are neither natural nor fixed. Hierarchization involves a value judgment based on regarding one group or category of individuals as being superior or inferior to another. Essentialization is a process by which individuals are reduced to moral characteristics, intellectual faculties or psychological traits alleged to be an immutable and inherited feature of that particular group. Having presented the stage for France, the following directly address the questions posed by Alan Goodman.","PeriodicalId":48668,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anthropological Sciences","volume":"95 ","pages":"307-310"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2017-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"35158268","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
The absence of race in Norway? 挪威没有种族歧视?
IF 1.8 2区 社会学 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY Pub Date : 2017-12-30 Epub Date: 2017-07-13 DOI: 10.4436/JASS.95012
Jon Røyne Kyllingstad
During the last four to five decades, Norway has received immigrants from all over the world. About 16% of the Norwegian population are now immigrants or Norwegian-born children of immigrant. About half of these have African, Asian or Latin American backgrounds (SSB, 2017). Norway is becoming an increasingly multiethnic society. This causes social tensions and political controversy. Immigration policy is presently among the most heated and polarized topics in Norwegian public and political debates. The Norwegian public sphere is permeated by discussions about racism, discrimination, ethnicity, national identity, social integration, cultural pluralism, and how to deal with cultural and religious differences. However, these issues are rarely construed as “racial” issues. It is not common to use the term “race” in political or public discussions or in social scientific research about Norwegian society, and racial categories are never used in statistics. It has not always been like this. In the early decades of the 20th century, notions about a hierarchy of races was unproblematized and commonplace within public, political and academic discourses in Norway, as in the rest of the western world. In the decades after the Second World War, however, such ideas became increasingly marginalized and delegitimized in science, legislation, politics and public discourse. Scientific racism and the notion of race as a meaningful biological concept suffered a loss of legitimacy, but in contrast to for example the USA, this was not paralleled by the rise of an academic and political discourse about race as a social construction. Instead, politicians, bureaucrats and academics who have been studying, discussing, and managing the Norwegian society during the last decades seem, in general, to have ignored or dismissed any conceptualization of “race”. By looking at some historical examples, this article shows how “race” was once intertwined with notions of Norwegian nationhood and attitudes towards minorities, it discuss how the retreat of “race” has affected these notions and attitudes, and, finally presents some views on the absence or presence of “race” in contemporary Norwegian discourses on immigration and the multicultural society. Do racial perceptions and racial discrimination play an insignificant role in Norwegian society, as compared to for example the USA, or do the relative absence of research and discussions on “race” mean that Norwegian academics, and the Norwegian public, are avoiding to talk about an important societal issue, namely that “race” actually matters, even in Norway?
{"title":"The absence of race in Norway?","authors":"Jon Røyne Kyllingstad","doi":"10.4436/JASS.95012","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4436/JASS.95012","url":null,"abstract":"During the last four to five decades, Norway has received immigrants from all over the world. About 16% of the Norwegian population are now immigrants or Norwegian-born children of immigrant. About half of these have African, Asian or Latin American backgrounds (SSB, 2017). Norway is becoming an increasingly multiethnic society. This causes social tensions and political controversy. Immigration policy is presently among the most heated and polarized topics in Norwegian public and political debates. The Norwegian public sphere is permeated by discussions about racism, discrimination, ethnicity, national identity, social integration, cultural pluralism, and how to deal with cultural and religious differences. However, these issues are rarely construed as “racial” issues. It is not common to use the term “race” in political or public discussions or in social scientific research about Norwegian society, and racial categories are never used in statistics. It has not always been like this. In the early decades of the 20th century, notions about a hierarchy of races was unproblematized and commonplace within public, political and academic discourses in Norway, as in the rest of the western world. In the decades after the Second World War, however, such ideas became increasingly marginalized and delegitimized in science, legislation, politics and public discourse. Scientific racism and the notion of race as a meaningful biological concept suffered a loss of legitimacy, but in contrast to for example the USA, this was not paralleled by the rise of an academic and political discourse about race as a social construction. Instead, politicians, bureaucrats and academics who have been studying, discussing, and managing the Norwegian society during the last decades seem, in general, to have ignored or dismissed any conceptualization of “race”. By looking at some historical examples, this article shows how “race” was once intertwined with notions of Norwegian nationhood and attitudes towards minorities, it discuss how the retreat of “race” has affected these notions and attitudes, and, finally presents some views on the absence or presence of “race” in contemporary Norwegian discourses on immigration and the multicultural society. Do racial perceptions and racial discrimination play an insignificant role in Norwegian society, as compared to for example the USA, or do the relative absence of research and discussions on “race” mean that Norwegian academics, and the Norwegian public, are avoiding to talk about an important societal issue, namely that “race” actually matters, even in Norway?","PeriodicalId":48668,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anthropological Sciences","volume":"95 ","pages":"319-327"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2017-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"35168483","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7
Faces in the mirror, from the neuroscience of mimicry to the emergence of mentalizing. 镜子里的脸,从模仿的神经科学到心智化的出现。
IF 1.8 2区 社会学 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY Pub Date : 2016-06-20 Epub Date: 2015-05-11 DOI: 10.4436/JASS.94037
Antonella Tramacere, Pier Francesco Ferrari

In the current opinion paper, we provide a comparative perspective on specific aspects of primate empathic abilities, with particular emphasis on the mirror neuron system associated with mouth/face actions and expression. Mouth and faces can be very salient communicative classes of stimuli that allow an observer access to the emotional and physiological content of other individuals. We thus describe patterns of activations of neural populations related to observation and execution of specific mouth actions and emotional facial expressions in some species of monkeys and in humans. Particular attention is given to dynamics of face-to-face interactions in the early phases of development and to the differences in the anatomy of facial muscles among different species of primates. We hypothesize that increased complexity in social environments and patterns of social development have promoted specializations of facial musculature, behavioral repertoires related to production and recognition of facial emotional expression, and their neural correlates. In several primates, mirror circuits involving parietal-frontal regions, insular regions, cingulate cortices, and amygdala seem to support automatic forms of embodied empathy, which probably contribute to facial mimicry and behavioural synchrony. In humans these circuits interact with specific prefrontal and temporo-parietal cortical regions, which facilitates higher order cognitive functions such as cognitive empathy and mental state attribution. Our analysis thus suggests that the evolution of higher forms of empathy, such as mentalizing, is also linked to the coupling between the perceptual and motor system related to face processing, which may have undergone a process of exaptation during primate phylogeny.

在当前的观点论文中,我们提供了灵长类共情能力的特定方面的比较观点,特别强调与嘴/脸动作和表情相关的镜像神经元系统。嘴和脸可以是非常显著的交际刺激,使观察者能够接触到其他人的情感和生理内容。因此,我们描述了在某些种类的猴子和人类中,与观察和执行特定的嘴部动作和情绪面部表情相关的神经群的激活模式。特别注意的是,在发展的早期阶段,面对面的互动动力学和不同种类的灵长类动物在面部肌肉解剖上的差异。我们假设,社会环境的复杂性和社会发展模式的增加促进了面部肌肉组织的专业化,与面部情绪表达的产生和识别相关的行为库及其神经相关。在一些灵长类动物中,涉及顶叶-额叶区域、岛状区域、扣带皮层和杏仁核的镜像回路似乎支持自动形式的具身移情,这可能有助于面部模仿和行为同步。在人类中,这些回路与特定的前额叶和颞顶叶皮层区域相互作用,促进认知共情和精神状态归因等高级认知功能。因此,我们的分析表明,高级共情形式的进化,如心智化,也与与面部处理相关的感知和运动系统之间的耦合有关,这可能在灵长类动物的系统发育过程中经历了一个递解过程。
{"title":"Faces in the mirror, from the neuroscience of mimicry to the emergence of mentalizing.","authors":"Antonella Tramacere,&nbsp;Pier Francesco Ferrari","doi":"10.4436/JASS.94037","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4436/JASS.94037","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In the current opinion paper, we provide a comparative perspective on specific aspects of primate empathic abilities, with particular emphasis on the mirror neuron system associated with mouth/face actions and expression. Mouth and faces can be very salient communicative classes of stimuli that allow an observer access to the emotional and physiological content of other individuals. We thus describe patterns of activations of neural populations related to observation and execution of specific mouth actions and emotional facial expressions in some species of monkeys and in humans. Particular attention is given to dynamics of face-to-face interactions in the early phases of development and to the differences in the anatomy of facial muscles among different species of primates. We hypothesize that increased complexity in social environments and patterns of social development have promoted specializations of facial musculature, behavioral repertoires related to production and recognition of facial emotional expression, and their neural correlates. In several primates, mirror circuits involving parietal-frontal regions, insular regions, cingulate cortices, and amygdala seem to support automatic forms of embodied empathy, which probably contribute to facial mimicry and behavioural synchrony. In humans these circuits interact with specific prefrontal and temporo-parietal cortical regions, which facilitates higher order cognitive functions such as cognitive empathy and mental state attribution. Our analysis thus suggests that the evolution of higher forms of empathy, such as mentalizing, is also linked to the coupling between the perceptual and motor system related to face processing, which may have undergone a process of exaptation during primate phylogeny. </p>","PeriodicalId":48668,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anthropological Sciences","volume":"94 ","pages":"113-26"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2016-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"34545633","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 38
What made us human? Biological and cultural evolution of Homo sapiens. 是什么让我们成为人类?智人的生物和文化进化。
IF 1.8 2区 社会学 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY Pub Date : 2016-06-20 Epub Date: 2015-05-05 DOI: 10.4436/JASS.94036
Stefano Parmigiani, Telmo Pievani, Ian Tattersall
The science of human evolution has recently been changing rapidly, and we know that Homo sapiens is the last surviving branch of a once-luxuriant tree of hominid species. Until very recent times, our lineage shared the planet with several other human species, such as those containing Homo neanderthalensis, Homo erectus and Homo floresiensis. Following its biological and anatomical birth in Africa around 200,000 years ago Homo sapiens spread around the world, following multiple paths of expansion that we can now track using the techniques of molecular biology, ancient DNA studies and paleoanthropology. In this global, ecological and demographic scenario, at one point our species began to express cognitively modern behaviors: a “symbolic intelligence” so peculiar that scientists view it as the hallmark of human creativity and uniqueness itself. Was there a gap between our biological birth and our intellectual birth? Was the process a gradual or a punctuational one? What triggered the so-called Paleolithic Revolution? How did our cultural evolution interact with our biological evolution? What might have been the role of other human species? Is articulate language our “secret weapon”? This Special Issue addresses these questions, gathering the contributions presented in the meeting held in the beautiful context of the Erice International School of Ethology1 from October 14th – 19th, 2014. Very importantly, the versions published here have been updated with the latest findings and the most recent literature. The workshop was the second in a program of meetings dedicated to human evolution and human uniqueness, and followed the first workshop held in June 2012, titled Evolved Morality. The biology and philosophy of human conscience2. The meeting involved prominent experts in primatology, paleoanthropology, genetics, anthropology, ethology and philosophy, and originated in discussions between paleoanthropologist Ian Tattersall, philosopher of science Telmo Pievani and ethologist Stefano Parmigiani, on how best to shed light on deep questions that necessarily require a cross-disciplinary effort.
{"title":"What made us human? Biological and cultural evolution of Homo sapiens.","authors":"Stefano Parmigiani,&nbsp;Telmo Pievani,&nbsp;Ian Tattersall","doi":"10.4436/JASS.94036","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4436/JASS.94036","url":null,"abstract":"The science of human evolution has recently been changing rapidly, and we know that Homo sapiens is the last surviving branch of a once-luxuriant tree of hominid species. Until very recent times, our lineage shared the planet with several other human species, such as those containing Homo neanderthalensis, Homo erectus and Homo floresiensis. Following its biological and anatomical birth in Africa around 200,000 years ago Homo sapiens spread around the world, following multiple paths of expansion that we can now track using the techniques of molecular biology, ancient DNA studies and paleoanthropology. In this global, ecological and demographic scenario, at one point our species began to express cognitively modern behaviors: a “symbolic intelligence” so peculiar that scientists view it as the hallmark of human creativity and uniqueness itself. Was there a gap between our biological birth and our intellectual birth? Was the process a gradual or a punctuational one? What triggered the so-called Paleolithic Revolution? How did our cultural evolution interact with our biological evolution? What might have been the role of other human species? Is articulate language our “secret weapon”? This Special Issue addresses these questions, gathering the contributions presented in the meeting held in the beautiful context of the Erice International School of Ethology1 from October 14th – 19th, 2014. Very importantly, the versions published here have been updated with the latest findings and the most recent literature. The workshop was the second in a program of meetings dedicated to human evolution and human uniqueness, and followed the first workshop held in June 2012, titled Evolved Morality. The biology and philosophy of human conscience2. The meeting involved prominent experts in primatology, paleoanthropology, genetics, anthropology, ethology and philosophy, and originated in discussions between paleoanthropologist Ian Tattersall, philosopher of science Telmo Pievani and ethologist Stefano Parmigiani, on how best to shed light on deep questions that necessarily require a cross-disciplinary effort.","PeriodicalId":48668,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anthropological Sciences","volume":"94 ","pages":"1-4"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2016-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"34526750","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 37
Oldowan hominin behavior and ecology at Kanjera South,Kenya. 肯尼亚肯杰拉南部的奥尔多瓦人族行为与生态。
IF 1.8 2区 社会学 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY Pub Date : 2016-06-20 Epub Date: 2015-04-11 DOI: 10.4436/JASS.94033
Thomas Plummer, Laura Bishop

The Early Stone Age archaeological record does not become persistent and widespread until approximately 2.0-1.7 million years ago, when Oldowan sites spread across Africa and ultimately into Eurasia. However, good records of hominin behavior from this important time interval are uncommon. Here we describe recent findings from the two million year old Oldowan site of Kanjera South, on the Homa Peninsula of southwestern Kenya. Kanjera South is the oldest Oldowan site with large assemblages of stone artifacts and well-preserved archaeological fauna. Our research indicates that hominin activities were situated in an open habitat within a grassland dominated ecosystem, the first documentation of an archaeological site in such an open setting. Hominins selectively collected and transported stone materials (30% of the lithic assemblage) over longer distances (at least 10 km) than is typical for the Oldowan, reflecting their preference for hard, easily-flaked lithologies unavailable on the northern half of the Homa Peninsula. They deployed different technological strategies to more intensively utilize these hard, non-local raw materials. Artifacts were used for a variety of tasks, including butchering small antelopes probably obtained by hunting, working wood, working soft plant material, and processing underground storage organs. These data suggest that the Kanjera hominins utilized a technological system that allowed them to extract nutrient dense animal and plant foods from their environment. This shift towards the acquisition of nutritious, hard-to-acquire foods in packets large enough to be shared may have facilitated brain and body size expansion in the genus Homo.

早期石器时代的考古记录直到大约200 - 170万年前才变得持久和广泛,当时奥尔多瓦遗址遍布非洲并最终进入欧亚大陆。然而,在这个重要的时间间隔内,人类行为的良好记录并不多见。在这里,我们描述了在肯尼亚西南部霍马半岛的肯杰拉南部200万年前的奥尔多万遗址的最新发现。Kanjera South是Oldowan最古老的遗址,拥有大量的石头文物和保存完好的考古动物群。我们的研究表明,古人类活动位于草原主导的生态系统中的开放栖息地,这是在这种开放环境中首次记录考古遗址。与Oldowan相比,古人类有选择性地收集和运输了更长的距离(至少10公里)的石头(占岩屑组合的30%),这反映了他们对硬的、容易脱落的岩性的偏好,而这些岩性在Homa半岛的北半部是无法获得的。他们采用了不同的技术策略,以更密集地利用这些坚硬的、非本地的原材料。人工制品被用于各种各样的任务,包括屠杀可能通过狩猎获得的小羚羊,加工木材,加工柔软的植物材料,以及加工地下储存器官。这些数据表明,坎杰拉古人类利用了一种技术系统,使他们能够从环境中提取营养丰富的动植物食物。这种向获取营养丰富的、难以获取的食物的转变可能促进了人属的大脑和身体尺寸的扩大。
{"title":"Oldowan hominin behavior and ecology at Kanjera South,Kenya.","authors":"Thomas Plummer,&nbsp;Laura Bishop","doi":"10.4436/JASS.94033","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4436/JASS.94033","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Early Stone Age archaeological record does not become persistent and widespread until approximately 2.0-1.7 million years ago, when Oldowan sites spread across Africa and ultimately into Eurasia. However, good records of hominin behavior from this important time interval are uncommon. Here we describe recent findings from the two million year old Oldowan site of Kanjera South, on the Homa Peninsula of southwestern Kenya. Kanjera South is the oldest Oldowan site with large assemblages of stone artifacts and well-preserved archaeological fauna. Our research indicates that hominin activities were situated in an open habitat within a grassland dominated ecosystem, the first documentation of an archaeological site in such an open setting. Hominins selectively collected and transported stone materials (30% of the lithic assemblage) over longer distances (at least 10 km) than is typical for the Oldowan, reflecting their preference for hard, easily-flaked lithologies unavailable on the northern half of the Homa Peninsula. They deployed different technological strategies to more intensively utilize these hard, non-local raw materials. Artifacts were used for a variety of tasks, including butchering small antelopes probably obtained by hunting, working wood, working soft plant material, and processing underground storage organs. These data suggest that the Kanjera hominins utilized a technological system that allowed them to extract nutrient dense animal and plant foods from their environment. This shift towards the acquisition of nutritious, hard-to-acquire foods in packets large enough to be shared may have facilitated brain and body size expansion in the genus Homo. </p>","PeriodicalId":48668,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anthropological Sciences","volume":"94 ","pages":"29-40"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2016-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"34753605","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 29
期刊
Journal of Anthropological Sciences
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1