Global Food Security-Agriculture Policy Economics and Environment最新文献_第2页

Physical understanding of food systems towards sustainability with material flow analysis: A critical review 通过物质流分析对食品系统的可持续性的物理理解：一个重要的回顾

IF 9.6 1区经济学 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY

Global Food Security-Agriculture Policy Economics and Environment

Pub Date : 2025-12-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.gfs.2025.100896

Zhuang Qian , Wu Chen , Li Xue , Andrea Adelmo Della Penna , Jeanine Ammann , Carole Liechti , Dario Dongo , Gang Liu

Transforming food systems is essential for global sustainability and requires understanding from both socioeconomic and physical dimensions. However, sustainable food systems literature is largely dominated by socioeconomic dimension, while physical understanding of food systems remains limited. Such physical characterisation is often done using material flow analysis (MFA) to explore and quantify flows from farm to fork. This quantification translates food system dynamics into comparable and transparent metrics, making MFA a crucial tool in driving an efficient transformation. Here, using a critical literature review, we analysed 127 agrifood MFA studies on their systems, data, and indicators. We characterized food supply chain into five stages (primary production, processing and manufacturing, trade, distribution and retailing, and public and household consumption) and found very few covered all stages (16 studies). Among all stages, primary production was the most studied (99 studies), while distribution and retailing was the least studied (33 studies). Existing studies covered 12 food categories, primarily focusing on cereals (52 %), vegetables (46 %), and meats (43 %), with less attention on dairy products (34 %). Only 34 studies have a single food category resolution, while most aggregated multiple categories together. We found that over half of agrifood MFAs used data only from secondary sources (e.g., statistics), whereas less than 20 % used exclusively primary data. Agrifood MFAs commonly used indicators of substance, food, and bio-nutrient to quantify biomass associated flows, informing key food systems issues like nutrient circularity and waste management. Accordingly, we call for research on full chain MFAs, single food category analyses, and the use of more targeted datasets.

粮食系统转型对全球可持续性至关重要，需要从社会经济和物质两方面进行理解。然而，可持续粮食系统的文献在很大程度上是由社会经济维度主导的，而对粮食系统的物理理解仍然有限。这种物理特征通常使用物料流分析（MFA）来探索和量化从农场到餐桌的流动。这种量化将粮食系统动态转化为可比较和透明的指标，使MFA成为推动有效转型的关键工具。本文通过文献综述，分析了127项农业食品MFA研究的系统、数据和指标。我们将食品供应链分为五个阶段（初级生产、加工和制造、贸易、分销和零售以及公共和家庭消费），发现很少有研究涵盖所有阶段（16项研究）。在所有阶段中，对初级生产的研究最多（99项研究），对分销和零售的研究最少（33项研究）。现有的研究涵盖了12种食物类别，主要集中在谷物（52% %）、蔬菜（46% %）和肉类（43% %），较少关注乳制品（34% %）。只有34项研究有单一的食物类别，而大多数研究将多个类别合并在一起。我们发现，超过一半的农业食品MFAs仅使用二手来源的数据（例如统计数据），而不到20% %的MFAs完全使用原始数据。农业食品MFAs通常使用物质、食品和生物营养素指标来量化与生物质相关的流动，为营养循环和废物管理等关键粮食系统问题提供信息。因此，我们呼吁研究全链mfa，单一食品类别分析，并使用更有针对性的数据集。

{"title":"Physical understanding of food systems towards sustainability with material flow analysis: A critical review","authors":"Zhuang Qian , Wu Chen , Li Xue , Andrea Adelmo Della Penna , Jeanine Ammann , Carole Liechti , Dario Dongo , Gang Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.gfs.2025.100896","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.gfs.2025.100896","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Transforming food systems is essential for global sustainability and requires understanding from both socioeconomic and physical dimensions. However, sustainable food systems literature is largely dominated by socioeconomic dimension, while physical understanding of food systems remains limited. Such physical characterisation is often done using material flow analysis (MFA) to explore and quantify flows from farm to fork. This quantification translates food system dynamics into comparable and transparent metrics, making MFA a crucial tool in driving an efficient transformation. Here, using a critical literature review, we analysed 127 agrifood MFA studies on their systems, data, and indicators. We characterized food supply chain into five stages (primary production, processing and manufacturing, trade, distribution and retailing, and public and household consumption) and found very few covered all stages (16 studies). Among all stages, primary production was the most studied (99 studies), while distribution and retailing was the least studied (33 studies). Existing studies covered 12 food categories, primarily focusing on cereals (52 %), vegetables (46 %), and meats (43 %), with less attention on dairy products (34 %). Only 34 studies have a single food category resolution, while most aggregated multiple categories together. We found that over half of agrifood MFAs used data only from secondary sources (e.g., statistics), whereas less than 20 % used exclusively primary data. Agrifood MFAs commonly used indicators of substance, food, and bio-nutrient to quantify biomass associated flows, informing key food systems issues like nutrient circularity and waste management. Accordingly, we call for research on full chain MFAs, single food category analyses, and the use of more targeted datasets.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48741,"journal":{"name":"Global Food Security-Agriculture Policy Economics and Environment","volume":"47 ","pages":"Article 100896"},"PeriodicalIF":9.6,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145693237","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

The protein transition into context – the impact of dietary shifts in different countries on nutritional adequacy of diets 蛋白质过渡到上下文-不同国家的饮食变化对饮食营养充足性的影响

IF 9.6 1区经济学 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY

Global Food Security-Agriculture Policy Economics and Environment

Pub Date : 2025-12-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.gfs.2025.100895

R.P.M. Cardinaals , G. Bubnyte , T. Huppertz

The term ‘protein transition’ is used to address a dietary shift from animal-source foods (ASF) to plant-source foods (PSF). This indirectly implies a focus on protein as the main nutrient of concern to reduce food-related pressures on the environment and tackle unhealthy diets. In a Western context, there is growing consensus that a protein transition is indeed favorable but it can be misinterpreted as a uniform solution, and specificity for low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) are lacking. This study examined the nutritional implications of replacing currently consumed ASF with PSF to achieve diets that align with the protein transition, for low-, middle- and high-income countries. Using data from dietary surveys as a starting point, we stepwise replaced currently consumed ASF with currently consumed PSF to either meet current energy intake, or current total protein intake. The results show that substituting ASF either increased the nutrient adequacy gaps for eight out of nine studied nutrients when maintaining current energy intake, or largely increased energy intake when maintaining current total protein intake. More importantly, nutrient adequacy of current and alternative diets showed large variability among countries, age- and gender groups, while culturally specific (animal-source) foods were an important source of nutrients. There is no uniform solution for sustainable healthy diets, and rather research in this area should consider nutritional needs of the target population and culture specific food habits.

“蛋白质转化”一词用于描述从动物源食品（ASF）到植物源食品（PSF）的饮食转变。这间接意味着要把重点放在蛋白质这一主要营养素上，以减少与食物有关的环境压力和解决不健康饮食问题。在西方，越来越多的人认为蛋白质转化确实是有利的，但它可能被误解为一种统一的解决方案，并且缺乏针对低收入和中等收入国家（LMIC）的特异性。本研究调查了在低收入、中等收入和高收入国家，用PSF取代目前食用的ASF以实现与蛋白质过渡相一致的饮食的营养意义。以饮食调查数据为起点，我们逐步将当前消耗的ASF替换为当前消耗的PSF，以满足当前的能量摄入或当前的总蛋白质摄入量。结果表明，在维持当前能量摄入量的情况下，替代ASF增加了9种研究营养素中8种的营养充足性缺口，或者在维持当前总蛋白质摄入量的情况下，大大增加了能量摄入量。更重要的是，当前和替代饮食的营养充足性在国家、年龄和性别群体之间存在很大差异，而具有文化特异性（动物源）的食物是重要的营养来源。可持续健康饮食没有统一的解决方案，这一领域的研究应考虑目标人群的营养需求和文化特定的饮食习惯。

{"title":"The protein transition into context – the impact of dietary shifts in different countries on nutritional adequacy of diets","authors":"R.P.M. Cardinaals , G. Bubnyte , T. Huppertz","doi":"10.1016/j.gfs.2025.100895","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.gfs.2025.100895","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The term ‘protein transition’ is used to address a dietary shift from animal-source foods (ASF) to plant-source foods (PSF). This indirectly implies a focus on protein as the main nutrient of concern to reduce food-related pressures on the environment and tackle unhealthy diets. In a Western context, there is growing consensus that a protein transition is indeed favorable but it can be misinterpreted as a uniform solution, and specificity for low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) are lacking. This study examined the nutritional implications of replacing currently consumed ASF with PSF to achieve diets that align with the protein transition, for low-, middle- and high-income countries. Using data from dietary surveys as a starting point, we stepwise replaced currently consumed ASF with currently consumed PSF to either meet current energy intake, or current total protein intake. The results show that substituting ASF either increased the nutrient adequacy gaps for eight out of nine studied nutrients when maintaining current energy intake, or largely increased energy intake when maintaining current total protein intake. More importantly, nutrient adequacy of current and alternative diets showed large variability among countries, age- and gender groups, while culturally specific (animal-source) foods were an important source of nutrients. There is no uniform solution for sustainable healthy diets, and rather research in this area should consider nutritional needs of the target population and culture specific food habits.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48741,"journal":{"name":"Global Food Security-Agriculture Policy Economics and Environment","volume":"47 ","pages":"Article 100895"},"PeriodicalIF":9.6,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145693352","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Assessing the impact of hydrological extremes on food security from post-disaster reporting 通过灾后报告评估水文极端事件对粮食安全的影响

IF 9.6 1区经济学 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY

Global Food Security-Agriculture Policy Economics and Environment

Pub Date : 2025-12-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.gfs.2025.100889

Nikolas Galli, Camilla Govoni, Maria Cristina Rulli

Climate change can potentially drive variations in the frequency and magnitude of hydrological extremes, and in turn, the impact these events have on agriculture. Agricultural damage resulting from extreme events can significantly affect food security at multiple scales, especially in contexts where pre-existing unfavorable social and economic conditions already hinder the stability and the effectiveness of the food supply chain. In these contexts, formulating approaches to directly quantify food security impacts of extreme events in a way that is compatible with local data availability, but at the same time reliable and transparent, becomes a crucial and urgent matter. Moreover, while the importance of the multifaceted repercussions of agricultural damage on food security has been highlighted in the current literature, investigations on impacts other than reduced crop availability remain understudied. Here, we propose a methodology to derive metrics of food availability, access, and utilization impacts from post-disaster assessments, by putting the affected communities at the core of the analysis, providing perspectives on food stability impacts. We apply the methodology to the severe floods that affected Malawi in the early months of 2015. We find that agricultural losses correspond to food sufficient for feeding more than 300,000 people and for balancing the diet of almost 2.3 million. Food security impacts also appear to disproportionately hit poorer and less food-secure districts. Despite necessary simplifications and associated limitations, the proposed methodology is easily replicable in other post-disaster contexts, allowing to provide more insightful information to policy and practice aimed at post-disaster food security management and restoration.

气候变化可能会导致极端水文事件发生的频率和程度发生变化，进而影响这些事件对农业的影响。极端事件造成的农业破坏可以在多个层面上严重影响粮食安全，特别是在先前不利的社会和经济条件已经阻碍粮食供应链的稳定性和有效性的情况下。在这种情况下，制定方法，直接量化极端事件对粮食安全的影响，既要与当地可用数据兼容，又要可靠和透明，这是一项至关重要和紧迫的任务。此外，虽然目前的文献强调了农业破坏对粮食安全的多方面影响的重要性，但对作物产量减少以外的影响的调查仍未得到充分研究。在这里，我们提出了一种方法，通过将受影响社区置于分析的核心，从粮食稳定性影响的角度出发，从灾后评估中得出粮食供应、获取和利用影响的指标。我们将该方法应用于2015年初影响马拉维的严重洪水。我们发现，农业损失相当于足以养活30多万人和平衡近230万人饮食的粮食。粮食安全的影响似乎也不成比例地打击了较贫穷和粮食不安全的地区。尽管有必要的简化和相关的限制，所提出的方法很容易在其他灾后情况下复制，从而为旨在灾后粮食安全管理和恢复的政策和实践提供更有见地的信息。

{"title":"Assessing the impact of hydrological extremes on food security from post-disaster reporting","authors":"Nikolas Galli, Camilla Govoni, Maria Cristina Rulli","doi":"10.1016/j.gfs.2025.100889","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.gfs.2025.100889","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Climate change can potentially drive variations in the frequency and magnitude of hydrological extremes, and in turn, the impact these events have on agriculture. Agricultural damage resulting from extreme events can significantly affect food security at multiple scales, especially in contexts where pre-existing unfavorable social and economic conditions already hinder the stability and the effectiveness of the food supply chain. In these contexts, formulating approaches to directly quantify food security impacts of extreme events in a way that is compatible with local data availability, but at the same time reliable and transparent, becomes a crucial and urgent matter. Moreover, while the importance of the multifaceted repercussions of agricultural damage on food security has been highlighted in the current literature, investigations on impacts other than reduced crop availability remain understudied. Here, we propose a methodology to derive metrics of food availability, access, and utilization impacts from post-disaster assessments, by putting the affected communities at the core of the analysis, providing perspectives on food stability impacts. We apply the methodology to the severe floods that affected Malawi in the early months of 2015. We find that agricultural losses correspond to food sufficient for feeding more than 300,000 people and for balancing the diet of almost 2.3 million. Food security impacts also appear to disproportionately hit poorer and less food-secure districts. Despite necessary simplifications and associated limitations, the proposed methodology is easily replicable in other post-disaster contexts, allowing to provide more insightful information to policy and practice aimed at post-disaster food security management and restoration.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48741,"journal":{"name":"Global Food Security-Agriculture Policy Economics and Environment","volume":"47 ","pages":"Article 100889"},"PeriodicalIF":9.6,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145693232","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Conceptualizing circularity in urban food systems: A scoping review 概念化循环在城市粮食系统：范围审查

IF 9.6 1区经济学 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY

Global Food Security-Agriculture Policy Economics and Environment

Pub Date : 2025-12-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.gfs.2025.100893

Emily Olsson

Circularity in urban food systems is increasingly recognized as a promising approach to improve sustainability by reducing waste and closing resource loops. Using a structured search and selection process, 89 peer-reviewed articles were identified and analyzed to determine current research trends, geographic focus, disciplinary backgrounds, methodological approaches, as well as potential benefits and risks. The review revealed that research on circular urban food systems (CUFS) is dominated by environmental and technical studies, particularly in the Global North, with a strong focus on urban agricultural production and waste re-use/valorization. However, the midstream portions of the food value chain (processing, distribution, retail, and consumption) are significantly underexplored, representing a critical gap. Geographically, there is an imbalance in the research, with the majority of studies concentrating on European cities, while fewer studies focus on the Global South. The social and economic dimensions of CUFS, including food security, market development, and livelihood improvements, remain underrepresented, highlighting the need for more interdisciplinary research and frameworks that integrate these aspects. Furthermore, potential risks related to health and safety, governance, and logistical challenges in CUFS have been insufficiently examined. The findings suggest that while CUFS holds great potential for contributing to sustainability, there is a need for more comprehensive and context-sensitive research. Expanding the scope of studies to include social and economic outcomes, addressing the midstream value chain, and focusing on underrepresented regions are essential to fully realize the potential benefits of circular urban food systems for sustainable development.

城市粮食系统的循环越来越被认为是通过减少浪费和关闭资源循环来提高可持续性的一种有希望的方法。通过结构化的检索和选择过程，对89篇同行评议文章进行了识别和分析，以确定当前的研究趋势、地理重点、学科背景、方法方法以及潜在的利益和风险。审查表明，关于城市循环粮食系统的研究主要是环境和技术研究，特别是在全球北方，重点是城市农业生产和废物再利用/增值。然而，食品价值链的中游部分（加工、分销、零售和消费）尚未得到充分开发，这是一个严重的缺口。在地理上，研究存在不平衡，大多数研究集中在欧洲城市，而很少有研究关注全球南方。CUFS的社会和经济层面，包括粮食安全、市场开发和改善生计，仍然没有得到充分的体现，这突出表明需要更多的跨学科研究和整合这些方面的框架。此外，尚未充分审查与卫生和安全、治理和后勤挑战有关的潜在风险。研究结果表明，虽然CUFS在促进可持续性方面具有巨大潜力，但仍需要进行更全面和对环境敏感的研究。扩大研究范围以包括社会和经济成果，解决价值链中游问题，并关注代表性不足的地区，对于充分实现城市循环粮食系统对可持续发展的潜在效益至关重要。

{"title":"Conceptualizing circularity in urban food systems: A scoping review","authors":"Emily Olsson","doi":"10.1016/j.gfs.2025.100893","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.gfs.2025.100893","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Circularity in urban food systems is increasingly recognized as a promising approach to improve sustainability by reducing waste and closing resource loops. Using a structured search and selection process, 89 peer-reviewed articles were identified and analyzed to determine current research trends, geographic focus, disciplinary backgrounds, methodological approaches, as well as potential benefits and risks. The review revealed that research on circular urban food systems (CUFS) is dominated by environmental and technical studies, particularly in the Global North, with a strong focus on urban agricultural production and waste re-use/valorization. However, the midstream portions of the food value chain (processing, distribution, retail, and consumption) are significantly underexplored, representing a critical gap. Geographically, there is an imbalance in the research, with the majority of studies concentrating on European cities, while fewer studies focus on the Global South. The social and economic dimensions of CUFS, including food security, market development, and livelihood improvements, remain underrepresented, highlighting the need for more interdisciplinary research and frameworks that integrate these aspects. Furthermore, potential risks related to health and safety, governance, and logistical challenges in CUFS have been insufficiently examined. The findings suggest that while CUFS holds great potential for contributing to sustainability, there is a need for more comprehensive and context-sensitive research. Expanding the scope of studies to include social and economic outcomes, addressing the midstream value chain, and focusing on underrepresented regions are essential to fully realize the potential benefits of circular urban food systems for sustainable development.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48741,"journal":{"name":"Global Food Security-Agriculture Policy Economics and Environment","volume":"47 ","pages":"Article 100893"},"PeriodicalIF":9.6,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145693236","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Striving for food security in a fragile and conflict-affected situation: The unintended consequences of delivering intended outcomes in Afghanistan 在脆弱和受冲突影响的局势中争取粮食安全：在阿富汗实现预期成果的意外后果

IF 9.6 1区经济学 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY

Global Food Security-Agriculture Policy Economics and Environment

Pub Date : 2025-12-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.gfs.2025.100890

Angus Alexander Davidson, John Leake, Di Zeng, Patrick O'Connor

Efforts to improve food security through agricultural development in fragile and conflict-affected situations (FCAS) can generate both intended and unintended outcomes. This study investigates yield trends and potential spillover effects associated with the Afghanistan Agricultural Support Programme (ASP), a development aid initiative implemented in Bamyan Province from 2011 to 2017. We combined household survey data from 110 farmers, collected in June 2021, with a 10-year time series of normalised difference vegetation index (NDVI) imagery, capturing seasonal mean peak values calibrated to wheat-growing periods, to examine yield patterns among target and non-target populations. NDVI pixel values were aggregated at the valley level and analysed across four categories: target areas, geographically or economically close areas, remote areas, and farmer-reported spillover zones. The analysis revealed convergence of NDVI values between target and non-target valleys during and after the programme period, consistent with the diffusion of improved seed or agronomic practices. These associations are consistent with potential spillover related to the programme's diffusion effects. While such diffusion may enhance food security, it may also carry political implications where programme benefits extend into areas that were intentionally excluded from direct implementation. Monitoring aid diffusion in FCAS thus requires attention to agronomic impact and its intersection with local governance dynamics. Integrating geospatial monitoring and conflict-sensitive evaluation frameworks could strengthen future programming in FCAS.

在脆弱和受冲突影响地区通过农业发展改善粮食安全的努力可能产生有意和无意的结果。本研究调查了2011年至2017年在巴米扬省实施的一项发展援助倡议——阿富汗农业支持计划（ASP）的产量趋势和潜在溢出效应。我们将2021年6月收集的110名农民的家庭调查数据与标准化植被指数（NDVI） 10年时间序列图像相结合，获取经小麦生长期校准的季节平均峰值，以研究目标和非目标人群的产量模式。NDVI像素值在山谷水平上汇总，并分四类进行分析：目标地区、地理或经济上接近的地区、偏远地区和农民报告的溢出区。分析显示，在方案期间和之后，目标谷和非目标谷之间的NDVI值趋于一致，这与改良种子或农艺做法的传播相一致。这些关联与该计划扩散效应的潜在溢出是一致的。虽然这种扩散可以加强粮食安全，但也可能产生政治影响，因为计划的好处延伸到有意排除在直接执行之外的地区。因此，监测援助在FCAS中的扩散需要关注农艺影响及其与地方治理动态的交集。将地理空间监测和对冲突敏感的评价框架结合起来可以加强FCAS今后的规划工作。

{"title":"Striving for food security in a fragile and conflict-affected situation: The unintended consequences of delivering intended outcomes in Afghanistan","authors":"Angus Alexander Davidson, John Leake, Di Zeng, Patrick O'Connor","doi":"10.1016/j.gfs.2025.100890","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.gfs.2025.100890","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Efforts to improve food security through agricultural development in fragile and conflict-affected situations (FCAS) can generate both intended and unintended outcomes. This study investigates yield trends and potential spillover effects associated with the Afghanistan Agricultural Support Programme (ASP), a development aid initiative implemented in Bamyan Province from 2011 to 2017. We combined household survey data from 110 farmers, collected in June 2021, with a 10-year time series of normalised difference vegetation index (NDVI) imagery, capturing seasonal mean peak values calibrated to wheat-growing periods, to examine yield patterns among target and non-target populations. NDVI pixel values were aggregated at the valley level and analysed across four categories: target areas, geographically or economically close areas, remote areas, and farmer-reported spillover zones. The analysis revealed convergence of NDVI values between target and non-target valleys during and after the programme period, consistent with the diffusion of improved seed or agronomic practices. These associations are consistent with potential spillover related to the programme's diffusion effects. While such diffusion may enhance food security, it may also carry political implications where programme benefits extend into areas that were intentionally excluded from direct implementation. Monitoring aid diffusion in FCAS thus requires attention to agronomic impact and its intersection with local governance dynamics. Integrating geospatial monitoring and conflict-sensitive evaluation frameworks could strengthen future programming in FCAS.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48741,"journal":{"name":"Global Food Security-Agriculture Policy Economics and Environment","volume":"47 ","pages":"Article 100890"},"PeriodicalIF":9.6,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145693355","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Maize varietal turnover in eastern Africa: Current challenges and future research directions 东非玉米品种周转：当前挑战与未来研究方向

IF 9.6 1区经济学 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY

Global Food Security-Agriculture Policy Economics and Environment

Pub Date : 2025-12-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.gfs.2025.100888

Hugo De Groote , Sarah W. Kariuki , Michael K. Ndegwa , Mercy Mbugua , Walter Chivasa , Moti Jaleta

引用次数: 0

Measuring agricultural sustainability: Revisiting Sustainable Development Goal Indicator 2.4.1 and its proxy 衡量农业可持续性：重新审视可持续发展目标指标2.4.1及其替代指标

IF 9.6 1区经济学 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY

Global Food Security-Agriculture Policy Economics and Environment

Pub Date : 2025-09-27 DOI: 10.1016/j.gfs.2025.100887

Suyu Liu

Sustainable agriculture is a central target of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), with the development of SDG Indicator 2.4.1 to assess the progress towards sustainable agriculture at national and global levels. A 2023 article published in Global Food Security highlighted both the strengths and limitations of this indicator. Since then, despite the tremendous efforts from the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, the low availability of data has been a challenge for measuring agricultural sustainability with SDG Indicator 2.4.1.

One of the most notable efforts to address the persistent issue of low data availability is the development of a proxy indicator coordinated by FAO, the custodian agency of SDG Indicator 2.4.1. This perspective article examines the contributions and limitations of the proxy, which uses seven sub-indicators to assess both current status and trends in agricultural sustainability. The proxy significantly improves data availability and enables trend analysis and sub-indicator-level comparisons. However, concerns remain about the ambiguity in its scoring methodology and the penalization of missing data, which may disproportionately affect countries with relatively weaker statistical capacity. This article offers suggestions for improving the proxy's design and implementation, especially alternative methods of treating missing data and wider participation in its further updates with more consideration of national statistical capacity. It also highlights opportunities for future research on cross-SDG interactions and the integration of local knowledge. While the proxy offers a practical interim solution, continued efforts to strengthen national statistical systems remain essential for fully realizing the intent of SDG Indicator 2.4.1.

可持续农业是可持续发展目标（SDG）的核心目标，可持续发展目标指标2.4.1的制定旨在评估国家和全球层面在可持续农业方面的进展。《全球粮食安全》杂志2023年发表的一篇文章强调了这一指标的优势和局限性。从那时起，尽管联合国粮食及农业组织做出了巨大努力，但数据可用性低一直是用可持续发展目标指标2.4.1衡量农业可持续性的一个挑战。为解决数据可用性低这一长期存在的问题，最引人注目的努力之一是制定一项由可持续发展目标指标2.4.1的托管机构粮农组织协调的代理指标。这篇前瞻性文章考察了代理的贡献和局限性，该代理使用七个子指标来评估农业可持续性的现状和趋势。该代理显著提高了数据的可用性，并支持趋势分析和子指标级别的比较。然而，仍然令人关切的是，它的计分方法含糊不清，对缺少数据的惩罚可能不成比例地影响到统计能力相对较弱的国家。本文提出了改进代理的设计和实施的建议，特别是处理缺失数据的替代方法，以及在更多地考虑国家统计能力的情况下更广泛地参与其进一步更新。它还强调了未来研究跨可持续发展目标相互作用和地方知识整合的机会。虽然代理提供了一个切实可行的临时解决方案，但继续努力加强国家统计系统对于充分实现可持续发展目标指标2.4.1的意图仍然至关重要。

{"title":"Measuring agricultural sustainability: Revisiting Sustainable Development Goal Indicator 2.4.1 and its proxy","authors":"Suyu Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.gfs.2025.100887","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.gfs.2025.100887","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Sustainable agriculture is a central target of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), with the development of SDG Indicator 2.4.1 to assess the progress towards sustainable agriculture at national and global levels. A 2023 article published in <em>Global Food Security</em> highlighted both the strengths and limitations of this indicator. Since then, despite the tremendous efforts from the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, the low availability of data has been a challenge for measuring agricultural sustainability with SDG Indicator 2.4.1.</div><div>One of the most notable efforts to address the persistent issue of low data availability is the development of a proxy indicator coordinated by FAO, the custodian agency of SDG Indicator 2.4.1. This perspective article examines the contributions and limitations of the proxy, which uses seven sub-indicators to assess both current status and trends in agricultural sustainability. The proxy significantly improves data availability and enables trend analysis and sub-indicator-level comparisons. However, concerns remain about the ambiguity in its scoring methodology and the penalization of missing data, which may disproportionately affect countries with relatively weaker statistical capacity. This article offers suggestions for improving the proxy's design and implementation, especially alternative methods of treating missing data and wider participation in its further updates with more consideration of national statistical capacity. It also highlights opportunities for future research on cross-SDG interactions and the integration of local knowledge. While the proxy offers a practical interim solution, continued efforts to strengthen national statistical systems remain essential for fully realizing the intent of SDG Indicator 2.4.1.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48741,"journal":{"name":"Global Food Security-Agriculture Policy Economics and Environment","volume":"47 ","pages":"Article 100887"},"PeriodicalIF":9.6,"publicationDate":"2025-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145157780","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Increasing inequality in agri-food value chains: global trends from 1995-2020 农业食品价值链不平等加剧：1995-2020年全球趋势

IF 9.6 1区经济学 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY

Global Food Security-Agriculture Policy Economics and Environment

Pub Date : 2025-09-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.gfs.2025.100883

Meghna Goyal , Jason Hickel , Praveen Jha

Agri-food systems are increasingly globalised. In the last three decades, as national food systems have become more interdependent, the distribution of productive activities and economic value between different actors and countries has changed. Prior research on domestic agri-food value chains has shown that the farm share of food-system income has declined consistently, while post-farmgate sectors capture the majority of income. Market concentration in post-farmgate sectors is high in industrialised economies and is driving food-system transformations in developing economies. Here, we extend this analysis to assess the global distributional consequences of food-system transformations for the first time. We use multi-regional input-output data to disaggregate food expenditures between different countries and sectors across agri-food value chains, from 1995 to 2020. We arrive at several main findings: 1) agricultural production for food and industrial inputs has increasingly shifted to the global South, 2) global food-system income is increasingly captured by post-farm activities in the global North, and 3) a substantial share of food-system income is captured in low-tax jurisdictions with low agricultural production. These findings demonstrate that the contemporary agri-food system and agricultural trade are skewing the distribution of economic returns away from agricultural producers in the global South.

农业食品系统日益全球化。在过去三十年中，随着各国粮食系统变得更加相互依存，生产活动和经济价值在不同行为者和国家之间的分配发生了变化。先前对国内农业食品价值链的研究表明，农业在粮食系统收入中所占的份额持续下降，而后农场部门占据了大部分收入。工业化经济体后农场部门的市场集中度很高，正在推动发展中经济体的粮食系统转型。在这里，我们首次将这一分析扩展到评估粮食系统转型的全球分布后果。我们使用多区域投入产出数据，对1995年至2020年农业食品价值链上不同国家和部门之间的粮食支出进行了分类。我们得出了几个主要发现：1)粮食和工业投入的农业生产越来越多地转移到全球南方；2)全球粮食系统收入越来越多地被全球北方的农场后活动捕获；3)粮食系统收入的很大一部分被农业产量低的低税收管辖区捕获。这些发现表明，当代农业食品体系和农业贸易正在扭曲经济回报的分配，使其远离全球南方的农业生产者。

{"title":"Increasing inequality in agri-food value chains: global trends from 1995-2020","authors":"Meghna Goyal , Jason Hickel , Praveen Jha","doi":"10.1016/j.gfs.2025.100883","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.gfs.2025.100883","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Agri-food systems are increasingly globalised. In the last three decades, as national food systems have become more interdependent, the distribution of productive activities and economic value between different actors and countries has changed. Prior research on domestic agri-food value chains has shown that the farm share of food-system income has declined consistently, while post-farmgate sectors capture the majority of income. Market concentration in post-farmgate sectors is high in industrialised economies and is driving food-system transformations in developing economies. Here, we extend this analysis to assess the global distributional consequences of food-system transformations for the first time. We use multi-regional input-output data to disaggregate food expenditures between different countries and sectors across agri-food value chains, from 1995 to 2020. We arrive at several main findings: 1) agricultural production for food and industrial inputs has increasingly shifted to the global South, 2) global food-system income is increasingly captured by post-farm activities in the global North, and 3) a substantial share of food-system income is captured in low-tax jurisdictions with low agricultural production. These findings demonstrate that the contemporary agri-food system and agricultural trade are skewing the distribution of economic returns away from agricultural producers in the global South.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48741,"journal":{"name":"Global Food Security-Agriculture Policy Economics and Environment","volume":"46 ","pages":"Article 100883"},"PeriodicalIF":9.6,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145094956","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Exploring the complexity of food systems assessments: A systematic literature review of frameworks and indicators 探索粮食系统评估的复杂性：对框架和指标的系统文献综述

IF 9.6 1区经济学 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY

Global Food Security-Agriculture Policy Economics and Environment

Pub Date : 2025-09-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.gfs.2025.100881

Yuba Raj Subedi , Cecile Godde , Pradeepa Korale-Gedara , Jeremy Farr , Selina Fyfe

There is growing momentum at the global level to assess food systems. This study aims to understand how food systems are being assessed by examining the frameworks, dimensions and indicators used. Following PRISMA guidelines, a systematic literature review identified 40 studies that primarily focused on assessing food systems or their components through a set of indicators. The review identified twelve key focus areas, of which sustainability assessments and the monitoring of food system performance were the most common. A limited number of studies explicitly defined what “food system” meant and how it was conceptualised in their study – a key point that most studies overlooked. Among the studies that used a framework, two types—conceptual and analytical—were used. Studies often modified frameworks by integrating theoretical concepts, methodological approaches, and disciplinary lenses to align with their goals and contexts. There was significant variation in the types and numbers of dimensions used to assess the same aspects of food systems. This study compiled 1096 indicators, revealing a skewed distribution towards environmental, socioeconomic, and nutrition-related domains. Literature reviews and participatory methods were the two most common approaches for selecting and shortlisting indicators. The predominance of outcome-related indicators compared to drivers and activities suggests that assessments have largely prioritised measuring impacts rather than understanding the underlying drivers and processes that shape food systems. This study highlights the importance of clearly defining food systems and being explicit about the motivations and underlying assumptions for choosing frameworks and indicators. Doing so is vital to ensure consistency in assessments and to advance knowledge for addressing complex food system challenges.

在全球一级，评估粮食系统的势头正在增强。本研究旨在通过检查所使用的框架、维度和指标，了解如何对粮食系统进行评估。根据PRISMA的指导方针，系统的文献综述确定了40项研究，这些研究主要侧重于通过一套指标评估粮食系统或其组成部分。审查确定了12个关键重点领域，其中可持续性评估和粮食系统绩效监测是最常见的。数量有限的研究明确定义了“食物系统”的含义以及在他们的研究中如何概念化——这是大多数研究忽略的一个关键点。在使用框架的研究中，使用了两种类型——概念性和分析性。研究通常通过整合理论概念、方法方法和学科镜头来修改框架，以使其与目标和背景保持一致。用于评估粮食系统相同方面的维度的类型和数量存在显著差异。该研究编制了1096项指标，揭示了环境、社会经济和营养相关领域的倾斜分布。文献综述和参与式方法是选择和筛选指标的两种最常见的方法。与驱动因素和活动相比，与结果相关的指标占主导地位，这表明评估在很大程度上优先考虑衡量影响，而不是了解塑造粮食系统的潜在驱动因素和过程。这项研究强调了明确界定粮食系统以及明确选择框架和指标的动机和基本假设的重要性。这样做对于确保评估的一致性和提高应对复杂粮食系统挑战的知识至关重要。

{"title":"Exploring the complexity of food systems assessments: A systematic literature review of frameworks and indicators","authors":"Yuba Raj Subedi , Cecile Godde , Pradeepa Korale-Gedara , Jeremy Farr , Selina Fyfe","doi":"10.1016/j.gfs.2025.100881","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.gfs.2025.100881","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>There is growing momentum at the global level to assess food systems. This study aims to understand how food systems are being assessed by examining the frameworks, dimensions and indicators used. Following PRISMA guidelines, a systematic literature review identified 40 studies that primarily focused on assessing food systems or their components through a set of indicators. The review identified twelve key focus areas, of which sustainability assessments and the monitoring of food system performance were the most common. A limited number of studies explicitly defined what “food system” meant and how it was conceptualised in their study – a key point that most studies overlooked. Among the studies that used a framework, two types—conceptual and analytical—were used. Studies often modified frameworks by integrating theoretical concepts, methodological approaches, and disciplinary lenses to align with their goals and contexts. There was significant variation in the types and numbers of dimensions used to assess the same aspects of food systems. This study compiled 1096 indicators, revealing a skewed distribution towards environmental, socioeconomic, and nutrition-related domains. Literature reviews and participatory methods were the two most common approaches for selecting and shortlisting indicators. The predominance of outcome-related indicators compared to drivers and activities suggests that assessments have largely prioritised measuring impacts rather than understanding the underlying drivers and processes that shape food systems. This study highlights the importance of clearly defining food systems and being explicit about the motivations and underlying assumptions for choosing frameworks and indicators. Doing so is vital to ensure consistency in assessments and to advance knowledge for addressing complex food system challenges.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48741,"journal":{"name":"Global Food Security-Agriculture Policy Economics and Environment","volume":"46 ","pages":"Article 100881"},"PeriodicalIF":9.6,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145094952","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Seeing famines: An exploration of the spatial dimensions of severe hunger crises 看到饥荒：对严重饥饿危机的空间维度的探索

IF 9.6 1区经济学 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY

Global Food Security-Agriculture Policy Economics and Environment

Pub Date : 2025-09-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.gfs.2025.100878

Paul Howe , Theo Anastopoulo , Christopher Newton

Famines can take various spatial forms, from sieges of single villages to transcontinental crises. Yet there has been little systematic study and conceptualization of their spatial dimensions, leading to confusion about where they are happening or will likely happen at a time of heightened risk globally. This paper helps to address this gap. It proposes that famines occur either in geographically wide-ranging ‘clusters’ of crises sharing common drivers or as stand-alone ‘singulars’ contained in delimited areas. It then makes a series of distinctions within these broader categories, classifying crises on a spectrum from closed to open, providing a vocabulary for describing spatial elements, and identifying a typology of common profiles. It applies the terminology and typology to a range of historical and contemporary crises. While recognizing the fundamental importance of political factors in causation, as well as some of the challenges in applying this approach, the paper argues that a clearer understanding of the spatial dimensions and logic of these crises can improve attempts to identify, respond to, and prevent famines in the future.

饥荒可以以不同的空间形式出现，从单个村庄的围困到跨大陆的危机。然而，对其空间维度的系统研究和概念化很少，导致在全球风险增加的时候，它们正在发生或可能发生的地方感到困惑。本文有助于解决这一差距。它提出，饥荒要么发生在地理上广泛的危机“集群”中，这些危机具有共同的驱动因素，要么发生在划定的区域中作为独立的“单一事件”。然后，它在这些更广泛的类别中进行了一系列区分，将危机从封闭到开放进行了分类，提供了描述空间元素的词汇表，并确定了常见概况的类型。它将术语和类型学应用于一系列历史和当代危机。虽然认识到政治因素在因果关系中的根本重要性，以及应用这一方法所面临的一些挑战，但本文认为，更清楚地了解这些危机的空间维度和逻辑，可以改善未来识别、应对和预防饥荒的努力。

{"title":"Seeing famines: An exploration of the spatial dimensions of severe hunger crises","authors":"Paul Howe , Theo Anastopoulo , Christopher Newton","doi":"10.1016/j.gfs.2025.100878","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.gfs.2025.100878","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Famines can take various spatial forms, from sieges of single villages to transcontinental crises. Yet there has been little systematic study and conceptualization of their spatial dimensions, leading to confusion about where they are happening or will likely happen at a time of heightened risk globally. This paper helps to address this gap. It proposes that famines occur either in geographically wide-ranging ‘clusters’ of crises sharing common drivers or as stand-alone ‘singulars’ contained in delimited areas. It then makes a series of distinctions within these broader categories, classifying crises on a spectrum from closed to open, providing a vocabulary for describing spatial elements, and identifying a typology of common profiles. It applies the terminology and typology to a range of historical and contemporary crises. While recognizing the fundamental importance of political factors in causation, as well as some of the challenges in applying this approach, the paper argues that a clearer understanding of the spatial dimensions and logic of these crises can improve attempts to identify, respond to, and prevent famines in the future.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48741,"journal":{"name":"Global Food Security-Agriculture Policy Economics and Environment","volume":"46 ","pages":"Article 100878"},"PeriodicalIF":9.6,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145094954","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0