Pub Date : 2023-08-01Epub Date: 2023-09-25DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1773802
Anthony D Koutsoftas, Kaitlin Lansford
{"title":"Foreword.","authors":"Anthony D Koutsoftas, Kaitlin Lansford","doi":"10.1055/s-0043-1773802","DOIUrl":"10.1055/s-0043-1773802","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":48772,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Speech and Language","volume":"44 4","pages":"203-204"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41172045","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-08-01Epub Date: 2023-08-11DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1771509
Stephanie Schaaf, Laura Liljequist, Randal Wilson, Sharon B Hart
Supervision is a dynamic and challenging leadership process that remains an essential element within the field of speech-language pathology. This study examines a facet of the supervisory relationship and investigates whether supervision styles are similarly perceived by the supervisor and supervisee and if a mismatch in perceptions relates to satisfaction between supervisor-supervisee dyads. Data were collected through completion of a demographic questionnaire as well as the Supervisory Style Inventory, which categorizes supervisory style as being attractive, interpersonally sensitive, task-oriented, or mixed. Findings demonstrate notable variance in the self-reported supervisor style and the style supervisees perceived as being demonstrated with over half (66%) of supervisor-supervisee dyads reporting a perceived mismatch in style. There was not a significant difference in the level of supervisee satisfaction for supervisor dyads reporting a match in style compared with mismatch. Satisfaction was correlated with all three reported style characteristics; however, interpersonal and task-oriented supervisory style characteristics were more strongly correlated with supervisee satisfaction. Having a mixed style was the only style that was significantly correlated with supervisees reporting having their needs met. Discussions include practical implications, limitations of the study, as well as recommendations for future research.
{"title":"Perception of Supervisory Styles.","authors":"Stephanie Schaaf, Laura Liljequist, Randal Wilson, Sharon B Hart","doi":"10.1055/s-0043-1771509","DOIUrl":"10.1055/s-0043-1771509","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Supervision is a dynamic and challenging leadership process that remains an essential element within the field of speech-language pathology. This study examines a facet of the supervisory relationship and investigates whether supervision styles are similarly perceived by the supervisor and supervisee and if a mismatch in perceptions relates to satisfaction between supervisor-supervisee dyads. Data were collected through completion of a demographic questionnaire as well as the Supervisory Style Inventory, which categorizes supervisory style as being attractive, interpersonally sensitive, task-oriented, or mixed. Findings demonstrate notable variance in the self-reported supervisor style and the style supervisees perceived as being demonstrated with over half (66%) of supervisor-supervisee dyads reporting a perceived mismatch in style. There was not a significant difference in the level of supervisee satisfaction for supervisor dyads reporting a match in style compared with mismatch. Satisfaction was correlated with all three reported style characteristics; however, interpersonal and task-oriented supervisory style characteristics were more strongly correlated with supervisee satisfaction. Having a mixed style was the only style that was significantly correlated with supervisees reporting having their needs met. Discussions include practical implications, limitations of the study, as well as recommendations for future research.</p>","PeriodicalId":48772,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Speech and Language","volume":" ","pages":"240-250"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10351077","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-08-01Epub Date: 2023-09-25DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1772598
Ann W Kummer
The purpose of this article is to (1) define the diagnostic characteristics of ankyloglossia, (2) identify potential problems associated with ankyloglossia, and (3) discuss treatment options, when treatment is appropriate. This article is based on a review of the literature, including recent systematic reviews, and the author's experience as a cleft and orofacial specialist. Ankyloglossia is a common congenital condition characterized by an anterior attachment of the lingual frenulum on the tongue. This causes difficulty elevating and/or protruding the tongue tip. As such, ankyloglossia has been thought to affect neonatal feeding, speech, and other functions. Although systematic reviews have concluded that most infants with ankyloglossia can be fed normally, a small percentage of affected infants will show improved efficiency of feeding post-frenotomy. They also concluded that frenotomy may relieve nipple pain in the breastfeeding mothers of affected infants. Regarding speech, the systematic reviews concluded that there is no evidence that ankyloglossia causes speech disorders. This may be because simple compensations will result in normal acoustics of the sounds. Therefore, frenotomy should be recommended sparingly for newborn infants, and it should rarely, if ever, be recommended for speech disorders.
{"title":"Ankyloglossia: Typical Characteristics, Effects on Function, and Clinical Implications.","authors":"Ann W Kummer","doi":"10.1055/s-0043-1772598","DOIUrl":"10.1055/s-0043-1772598","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of this article is to (1) define the diagnostic characteristics of ankyloglossia, (2) identify potential problems associated with ankyloglossia, and (3) discuss treatment options, when treatment is appropriate. This article is based on a review of the literature, including recent systematic reviews, and the author's experience as a cleft and orofacial specialist. Ankyloglossia is a common congenital condition characterized by an anterior attachment of the lingual frenulum on the tongue. This causes difficulty elevating and/or protruding the tongue tip. As such, ankyloglossia has been thought to affect neonatal feeding, speech, and other functions. Although systematic reviews have concluded that most infants with ankyloglossia can be fed normally, a small percentage of affected infants will show improved efficiency of feeding post-frenotomy. They also concluded that frenotomy may relieve nipple pain in the breastfeeding mothers of affected infants. Regarding speech, the systematic reviews concluded that there is no evidence that ankyloglossia causes speech disorders. This may be because simple compensations will result in normal acoustics of the sounds. Therefore, frenotomy should be recommended sparingly for newborn infants, and it should rarely, if ever, be recommended for speech disorders.</p>","PeriodicalId":48772,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Speech and Language","volume":"44 4","pages":"217-229"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41152540","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Kerwyn Jim C Chan, Larissa Christia F Adique, Kathy B Reyes-Brander, Steven Angelo J Maristela, Ken Kristoffer A Tort
Most individuals with orofacial cleft require various healthcare services, including speech therapy. However, Filipino patients constantly face challenges in availing these services due to limitations in the healthcare system of the Philippines. This study aimed to explore the perceptions of patients with orofacial cleft on the factors that may serve as facilitators and barriers to speech intervention. A descriptive phenomenological approach to qualitative research was used to obtain an in-depth understanding of the perceptions of these patients. Semistructured interviews were conducted through online video conferences or mobile phone calls. Twenty-one participants were interviewed, most of who were mothers (90%) of children with orofacial cleft. Ten themes were derived from the transcripts. Five were categorized as facilitators, while the rest were considered as barriers. Generally, the respondents showed positive attitudes toward orofacial cleft, were aware of the communication and swallowing issues of the patients, and actively sought services to address these issues. Most barriers to speech intervention resulted from limited access to quality healthcare services and information. These findings highlight the importance of considering patient perspectives in clinical care. Maximizing facilitators and addressing barriers may improve access to universal healthcare among Filipinos with orofacial cleft.
{"title":"Facilitators and Barriers to Speech Intervention of Patients with Orofacial Cleft in the Philippines: A Qualitative Study.","authors":"Kerwyn Jim C Chan, Larissa Christia F Adique, Kathy B Reyes-Brander, Steven Angelo J Maristela, Ken Kristoffer A Tort","doi":"10.1055/s-0043-1764432","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1764432","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Most individuals with orofacial cleft require various healthcare services, including speech therapy. However, Filipino patients constantly face challenges in availing these services due to limitations in the healthcare system of the Philippines. This study aimed to explore the perceptions of patients with orofacial cleft on the factors that may serve as facilitators and barriers to speech intervention. A descriptive phenomenological approach to qualitative research was used to obtain an in-depth understanding of the perceptions of these patients. Semistructured interviews were conducted through online video conferences or mobile phone calls. Twenty-one participants were interviewed, most of who were mothers (90%) of children with orofacial cleft. Ten themes were derived from the transcripts. Five were categorized as facilitators, while the rest were considered as barriers. Generally, the respondents showed positive attitudes toward orofacial cleft, were aware of the communication and swallowing issues of the patients, and actively sought services to address these issues. Most barriers to speech intervention resulted from limited access to quality healthcare services and information. These findings highlight the importance of considering patient perspectives in clinical care. Maximizing facilitators and addressing barriers may improve access to universal healthcare among Filipinos with orofacial cleft.</p>","PeriodicalId":48772,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Speech and Language","volume":"44 3","pages":"155-169"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9548937","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Lauren Bislick, Ashka Thakar, Elizabeth Brookshire Madden
This pilot study examined the impact of feedback type on learning a novel speech task, as measured by listener ratings, and will inform procedures for future investigations within a larger sample size. Twenty-four native monolingual English-speaking college-aged adults participated in a single training session to learn novel Hindi phrases. Participants were randomly placed into one of three feedback groups: knowledge of performance (KP), knowledge of results (KR), or a combined KP + KR condition. Participant performance was assessed at 1 day and 1 week post-training. Participant responses were audio recorded and judged for intelligibility, precision, and naturalness by native Hindi speakers, blind to the feedback conditions, via rating scales. At 2 days post-training, participants in the KP and KP + KR feedback conditions were rated as performing better than participants in the KR condition on all three perceptual measures. At 1 week post-training, participants in the KP feedback condition were judged to be superior across all three perceptual measures. Preliminary findings suggest that augmented feedback enhances learning, especially when skills are considered novel and learners are unable to rely on their own internal feedback. These results may have implications for the application of motor learning principles into clinical practice for persons with motor speech disorders.
{"title":"Exploring the Impact of Two Feedback Types on Speech Intelligibility, Precision, and Naturalness.","authors":"Lauren Bislick, Ashka Thakar, Elizabeth Brookshire Madden","doi":"10.1055/s-0043-1764201","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1764201","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This pilot study examined the impact of feedback type on learning a novel speech task, as measured by listener ratings, and will inform procedures for future investigations within a larger sample size. Twenty-four native monolingual English-speaking college-aged adults participated in a single training session to learn novel Hindi phrases. Participants were randomly placed into one of three feedback groups: knowledge of performance (KP), knowledge of results (KR), or a combined KP + KR condition. Participant performance was assessed at 1 day and 1 week post-training. Participant responses were audio recorded and judged for intelligibility, precision, and naturalness by native Hindi speakers, blind to the feedback conditions, via rating scales. At 2 days post-training, participants in the KP and KP + KR feedback conditions were rated as performing better than participants in the KR condition on all three perceptual measures. At 1 week post-training, participants in the KP feedback condition were judged to be superior across all three perceptual measures. Preliminary findings suggest that augmented feedback enhances learning, especially when skills are considered novel and learners are unable to rely on their own internal feedback. These results may have implications for the application of motor learning principles into clinical practice for persons with motor speech disorders.</p>","PeriodicalId":48772,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Speech and Language","volume":"44 3","pages":"170-188"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9543371","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Cognitive changes following adjuvant treatment for breast cancer (BC) are well documented following chemotherapy. However, limited studies have examined cognitive and/or language functions in chemotherapy-naive women with BC taking tamoxifen (TAM). Using ambulatory cognitive assessment, we investigated the trajectory of cognitive and language changes during early period of adjuvant endocrine treatment (TAM) in women with BC at two time periods (pretreatment and 2 months after treatment began). Four women with BC and 18 cognitively healthy age-matched controls completed three cognitive tasks using smartphones, during a short time period (5 days) and repeated them at two time periods. To determine language ability, language samples were collected at two time periods, where the participants described two stories from two wordless picture books and samples were assessed using core lexicon analyses. Wilcoxon-signed rank tests were computed to identify differences in linguistic and cognitive performances of both the groups at two time periods. No significant within-group or between-group differences were seen on the cognitive and language tasks at the two time periods; however, women with BC performed more poorly compared to the control group. We did see decline in some women with BC and not in others, in cognition and language during initial course of TAM treatment. However, the approach we used to assess these changes is valuable and innovative. This approach will help refine current research paradigms for determining cognitive and linguistic changes and will help determine if women with BC might require language intervention in the future.
{"title":"Tamoxifen Effects on Cognition and Language in Women with Breast Cancer.","authors":"Saryu Sharma, Heather Harris Wright","doi":"10.1055/s-0043-1768135","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1768135","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cognitive changes following adjuvant treatment for breast cancer (BC) are well documented following chemotherapy. However, limited studies have examined cognitive and/or language functions in chemotherapy-naive women with BC taking tamoxifen (TAM). Using ambulatory cognitive assessment, we investigated the trajectory of cognitive and language changes during early period of adjuvant endocrine treatment (TAM) in women with BC at two time periods (pretreatment and 2 months after treatment began). Four women with BC and 18 cognitively healthy age-matched controls completed three cognitive tasks using smartphones, during a short time period (5 days) and repeated them at two time periods. To determine language ability, language samples were collected at two time periods, where the participants described two stories from two wordless picture books and samples were assessed using core lexicon analyses. Wilcoxon-signed rank tests were computed to identify differences in linguistic and cognitive performances of both the groups at two time periods. No significant within-group or between-group differences were seen on the cognitive and language tasks at the two time periods; however, women with BC performed more poorly compared to the control group. We did see decline in some women with BC and not in others, in cognition and language during initial course of TAM treatment. However, the approach we used to assess these changes is valuable and innovative. This approach will help refine current research paradigms for determining cognitive and linguistic changes and will help determine if women with BC might require language intervention in the future.</p>","PeriodicalId":48772,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Speech and Language","volume":"44 3","pages":"189-202"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9548934","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Many social media sites are dedicated for speech-language pathologists (SLPs); however, the extent to which SLPs utilize them in clinical decision making and evidence-based practice (EBP) is not well understood. The purpose of this study was to explore SLPs' use of traditional and modern resources, including social media, within clinical decision making for assessment and intervention practices. Using a stratified random sampling approach, we invited school-based SLPs in Florida and Ohio and on pediatric-focused, SLP Facebook sites to complete an online survey. The majority (N = 271) reported using social media for professional purposes at least once per week: most frequently Facebook (19-25% of SLPs) or Pinterest (15-18% of SLPs) to learn about new treatment ideas or resources for (12-18%) or read others' summaries of treatment-related research (8-11%), but rarely to pose or answer a clinical question (3-5%). The number of reasons for one's professional social media use was moderately correlated with frequency of social media use, traditional EBP training, and reading a greater number of articles from ASHA and other sources. The results warrant further consideration of how to leverage social media as a tool to increase SLPs' knowledge and implementation of EBP.
{"title":"Like, Comment, and Share: Speech-Language Pathologists' Use of Social Media for Clinical Decision Making.","authors":"Emily A Diehm, Shannon Hall-Mills","doi":"10.1055/s-0043-1761949","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1761949","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Many social media sites are dedicated for speech-language pathologists (SLPs); however, the extent to which SLPs utilize them in clinical decision making and evidence-based practice (EBP) is not well understood. The purpose of this study was to explore SLPs' use of traditional and modern resources, including social media, within clinical decision making for assessment and intervention practices. Using a stratified random sampling approach, we invited school-based SLPs in Florida and Ohio and on pediatric-focused, SLP Facebook sites to complete an online survey. The majority (<i>N</i> = 271) reported using social media for professional purposes at least once per week: most frequently Facebook (19-25% of SLPs) or Pinterest (15-18% of SLPs) to learn about new treatment ideas or resources for (12-18%) or read others' summaries of treatment-related research (8-11%), but rarely to pose or answer a clinical question (3-5%). The number of reasons for one's professional social media use was moderately correlated with frequency of social media use, traditional EBP training, and reading a greater number of articles from ASHA and other sources. The results warrant further consideration of how to leverage social media as a tool to increase SLPs' knowledge and implementation of EBP.</p>","PeriodicalId":48772,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Speech and Language","volume":"44 3","pages":"139-154"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9543375","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-06-01Epub Date: 2023-05-23DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1768227
Kaitlin Lansford, Anthony D Koutsoftas
{"title":"Foreword.","authors":"Kaitlin Lansford, Anthony D Koutsoftas","doi":"10.1055/s-0043-1768227","DOIUrl":"10.1055/s-0043-1768227","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":48772,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Speech and Language","volume":"44 3","pages":"137-138"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9516633","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Acoustic cues of voice gender influence not only how people perceive the speaker's gender (e.g., whether that person is a man, woman, or non-binary) but also how they perceive certain phonemes produced by that person. One such sociophonetic cue is the [s]/[ʃ] distinction in English; which phoneme is perceived depends on the perceived gender of the speaker. Recent research has shown that gender expansive people differ from cisgender people in their perception of voice gender and thus, this could be reflected in their categorization of sibilants. Despite this, there has been no research to date on how gender expansive people categorize sibilants. Furthermore, while voice gender expression is often discussed within a biological context (e.g., vocal folds), voice extends to those who use other communication methods. The current study fills this gap by explicitly recruiting people of all genders and asking them to perform a sibilant categorization task using synthetic voices. The results show that cisgender and gender expansive people perceive synthetic sibilants differently, especially from a "nonbinary" synthetic voice. These results have implications for developing more inclusive speech technology for gender expansive individuals, in particular for nonbinary people who use speech-generating devices.
{"title":"Differences in Sibilant Perception between Gender Expansive and Cisgender Individuals.","authors":"Maxwell Hope, Jason Lilley","doi":"10.1055/s-0043-1761950","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1761950","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Acoustic cues of voice gender influence not only how people perceive the speaker's gender (e.g., whether that person is a man, woman, or non-binary) but also how they perceive certain phonemes produced by that person. One such sociophonetic cue is the [s]/[ʃ] distinction in English; which phoneme is perceived depends on the perceived gender of the speaker. Recent research has shown that gender expansive people differ from cisgender people in their perception of voice gender and thus, this could be reflected in their categorization of sibilants. Despite this, there has been no research to date on how gender expansive people categorize sibilants. Furthermore, while voice gender expression is often discussed within a biological context (e.g., vocal folds), voice extends to those who use other communication methods. The current study fills this gap by explicitly recruiting people of all genders and asking them to perform a sibilant categorization task using synthetic voices. The results show that cisgender and gender expansive people perceive synthetic sibilants differently, especially from a \"nonbinary\" synthetic voice. These results have implications for developing more inclusive speech technology for gender expansive individuals, in particular for nonbinary people who use speech-generating devices.</p>","PeriodicalId":48772,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Speech and Language","volume":"44 2","pages":"61-75"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9121658","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Forty years ago, recommendations for gender-affirming voice interventions were based on stereotypes and differences between cisgender men and women, the occasional conference presentation (e.g., Kalra 1977), and just two peer-reviewed case studies of women assigned male at birth: one changing their fundamental frequency (Bralley et al 1978) and another their non-verbal behaviors (Yardley 1976). It was also around this time that Kitajima Tanabe& Isshiki (1979) were refining parameters of cricothyroid approximation surgery on excised human larynges to have a surgical option for trans women seeking to elevate their vocal pitch. Today voice and communication interventions are guided by higher-quality empirical research on effectiveness, professional standards informed bymulti-disciplinary and international collaborations of researchers and practitioners, and people who are in the gender-expansive community (e.g., transgender, non-binary, genderqueer). Voice specialists supporting well-being directly (i.e., balancing communication-based stressors and resources) is an approach informed by clients and colleagues with lived experience in the gender expanse and the minority stress model from the mental health field. This is more affirming than an indirect approach focused on achieving congruence (i.e., changing behaviors to align with sociocultural normative practices) that potentially builds a stressor of ongoing concealment (Azul et al 2022). Remarkable exponential progress continues as we navigate new – and some longstanding – sociopolitical challenges. The purpose of this issue of Seminars in Speech and Language is to feature the understandings and practices of today as a clear benchmark in the story of progress. The issue begins with a paper by linguists Hope and Lilley investigating how speech is used in social indexing (i.e., signaling belonging in social groups) for gender. This study fills scientifically and socially important gaps in the speech perception literature by including synthetic stimuli that are outside of binary gender norms and a group of gender-expansive listeners. The findings have implications for clinical use of auditory perception in gender-affirming care, as well as for a multiply marginalized group: non-binary people who use speech generating devices. Overall, the direction of this work promises to improve and expand how speech-language pathologists serve non-binary people. The next two articles improve our ability to inform and empower clients to make their own decisions in a biopsychosocial approach, a central tenant of the person-centered care model that much of healthcare is striving toward today (Grover et al 2022). People need providers who explain information and support their chosen path to well-being. Voice surgery may be a part of that path, so Dwyer et al have written about the current surgical options for voice in the
{"title":"Progressing Toward High-Quality Voice Care for People of All Genders.","authors":"Adrienne B Hancock","doi":"10.1055/s-0043-1763297","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1763297","url":null,"abstract":"Forty years ago, recommendations for gender-affirming voice interventions were based on stereotypes and differences between cisgender men and women, the occasional conference presentation (e.g., Kalra 1977), and just two peer-reviewed case studies of women assigned male at birth: one changing their fundamental frequency (Bralley et al 1978) and another their non-verbal behaviors (Yardley 1976). It was also around this time that Kitajima Tanabe& Isshiki (1979) were refining parameters of cricothyroid approximation surgery on excised human larynges to have a surgical option for trans women seeking to elevate their vocal pitch. Today voice and communication interventions are guided by higher-quality empirical research on effectiveness, professional standards informed bymulti-disciplinary and international collaborations of researchers and practitioners, and people who are in the gender-expansive community (e.g., transgender, non-binary, genderqueer). Voice specialists supporting well-being directly (i.e., balancing communication-based stressors and resources) is an approach informed by clients and colleagues with lived experience in the gender expanse and the minority stress model from the mental health field. This is more affirming than an indirect approach focused on achieving congruence (i.e., changing behaviors to align with sociocultural normative practices) that potentially builds a stressor of ongoing concealment (Azul et al 2022). Remarkable exponential progress continues as we navigate new – and some longstanding – sociopolitical challenges. The purpose of this issue of Seminars in Speech and Language is to feature the understandings and practices of today as a clear benchmark in the story of progress. The issue begins with a paper by linguists Hope and Lilley investigating how speech is used in social indexing (i.e., signaling belonging in social groups) for gender. This study fills scientifically and socially important gaps in the speech perception literature by including synthetic stimuli that are outside of binary gender norms and a group of gender-expansive listeners. The findings have implications for clinical use of auditory perception in gender-affirming care, as well as for a multiply marginalized group: non-binary people who use speech generating devices. Overall, the direction of this work promises to improve and expand how speech-language pathologists serve non-binary people. The next two articles improve our ability to inform and empower clients to make their own decisions in a biopsychosocial approach, a central tenant of the person-centered care model that much of healthcare is striving toward today (Grover et al 2022). People need providers who explain information and support their chosen path to well-being. Voice surgery may be a part of that path, so Dwyer et al have written about the current surgical options for voice in the","PeriodicalId":48772,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Speech and Language","volume":"44 2","pages":"57-60"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9089477","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}