Pub Date : 2024-10-01Epub Date: 2024-05-24DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1787268
Matthew T Weintraub, Steven J Kurina, Joseph T Cline, Enrico M Forlenza, Richard A Berger, Tad L Gerlinger
The purpose of this study was to evaluate outcomes of late manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) for stiffness performed from ≥12 weeks to more than a year after primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). A total of 152 patients receiving MUA ≥12 weeks after primary TKA from 2014 to 2021 were reviewed. The primary outcome measured was change in range of motion (ROM). We tracked intraoperative complications and the need for repeat MUA or open procedure for continued stiffness after initial MUA. Three subgroups were analyzed: Group 1 included 58 knees between 12 weeks and 6 months after TKA, Group 2 included 44 knees between 6 and 12 months after TKA, and Group 3 included 50 knees ≥12 months after TKA. Analysis included descriptive statistics and univariate analysis, with α <0.05. Groups 1 to 3 all significantly increased their overall ROM by 20.9, 19.2, and 22.0 degrees, respectively. All groups significantly increased their flexion and extension from preoperatively. Group 1 had one intraoperative supracondylar femur fracture (1.7%) requiring open reduction and internal fixation, and five patients required repeat MUA or open procedure (8.6%). Group 2 had no intraoperative fractures, and five patients required repeat MUA or open procedure (11.4%). Group 3 had one intraoperative tibial tubercle avulsion fracture managed conservatively (2.0%) and one repeat MUA (2.0%). Late MUA resulted in significantly improved ROM in all groups. ROM improved more as the time from index TKA increased, although statistically insignificant. Repeat MUA or open procedure rate decreased with MUA ≥12 months from TKA, although statistically insignificant. The overall intraoperative fracture risk was 1.3%.
{"title":"Late Manipulation under Anesthesia after Total Knee Arthroplasty: Improved Range of Motion and a Low Complication Rate.","authors":"Matthew T Weintraub, Steven J Kurina, Joseph T Cline, Enrico M Forlenza, Richard A Berger, Tad L Gerlinger","doi":"10.1055/s-0044-1787268","DOIUrl":"10.1055/s-0044-1787268","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of this study was to evaluate outcomes of late manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) for stiffness performed from ≥12 weeks to more than a year after primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). A total of 152 patients receiving MUA ≥12 weeks after primary TKA from 2014 to 2021 were reviewed. The primary outcome measured was change in range of motion (ROM). We tracked intraoperative complications and the need for repeat MUA or open procedure for continued stiffness after initial MUA. Three subgroups were analyzed: Group 1 included 58 knees between 12 weeks and 6 months after TKA, Group 2 included 44 knees between 6 and 12 months after TKA, and Group 3 included 50 knees ≥12 months after TKA. Analysis included descriptive statistics and univariate analysis, with α <0.05. Groups 1 to 3 all significantly increased their overall ROM by 20.9, 19.2, and 22.0 degrees, respectively. All groups significantly increased their flexion and extension from preoperatively. Group 1 had one intraoperative supracondylar femur fracture (1.7%) requiring open reduction and internal fixation, and five patients required repeat MUA or open procedure (8.6%). Group 2 had no intraoperative fractures, and five patients required repeat MUA or open procedure (11.4%). Group 3 had one intraoperative tibial tubercle avulsion fracture managed conservatively (2.0%) and one repeat MUA (2.0%). Late MUA resulted in significantly improved ROM in all groups. ROM improved more as the time from index TKA increased, although statistically insignificant. Repeat MUA or open procedure rate decreased with MUA ≥12 months from TKA, although statistically insignificant. The overall intraoperative fracture risk was 1.3%.</p>","PeriodicalId":48798,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Knee Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"828-833"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141093392","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-01Epub Date: 2024-06-19DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1787829
Mehmet Ekinci, Taha Bedir Demir, Turker Sahinkaya, Sertac Yakal, Gokhan Polat, Bulent Bayraktar
The aim of our study is to evaluate preserving gracilis tendon in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) surgery and its effect to the flexion of the knee joint and tibial internal rotation strength and the stability of the knee. Patients who underwent primary single-bundle arthroscopic ACLR using all-inside technique and using hamstring tendon autograft were evaluated retrospectively. Patients were divided into two groups as gracilis preserved (St) and gracilis harvested (StG) groups. The International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, Lysholm, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score-Knee-related quality of life (KOOS-QOL) score, ACL-Return to Sport after Injury scale score were used to evaluate as postoperative functional scores at last follow-up. Anterior tibial translation was evaluated using the KT-1000 device. Knee joint flexion, extension, and internal rotation strength were evaluated using isokinetic dynamometer. Dynamic balance performances were measured using the Biodex Balance System. There were 24 patients in the St group and 23 patients in the StG group. Demographic data and clinical results showed no significant difference. Anteroposterior movement of the tibia was found to be significantly higher in the StG group than in the St group in measurements at 89 and 134 N, respectively (p = 0.01 and <0.001). No statistically significant difference was found between both standard and deep flexor and extensor and internal rotator strength. No statistically significant difference was found in the amount of total, anteroposterior, and mediolateral balance deficit between the two groups. Additional gracilis harvesting does not have a negative effect on both standard and deep knee flexion, and tibial internal rotation strength compared with the St group. Although semitendinosus and StG group showed significantly more anterior tibial translation, there was no significant difference in clinical and dynamic stability measurements.
我们的研究旨在评估在前交叉韧带重建(ACLR)手术中保留腓肠肌肌腱及其对膝关节屈曲、胫骨内旋力量和膝关节稳定性的影响。对使用全内侧技术和腘绳肌腱自体移植进行初级单束关节镜前交叉韧带重建的患者进行了回顾性评估。患者被分为两组,即腓肠肌保留组(St)和腓肠肌移植组(StG)。国际膝关节文献委员会(IKDC)评分、Lysholm、膝关节损伤和骨关节炎结果评分-膝关节相关生活质量(KOOS-QOL)评分、前交叉韧带-损伤后恢复运动量表评分作为术后最后一次随访的功能评分。使用 KT-1000 设备评估胫骨前移。膝关节屈曲、伸展和内旋力量使用等速测力计进行评估。动态平衡性能使用 Biodex 平衡系统进行测量。St 组有 24 名患者,StG 组有 23 名患者。人口统计学数据和临床结果均无明显差异。在 89 N 和 134 N 的测量中,StG 组的胫骨前后移动明显高于 St 组(p = 0.01 和 p = 0.01)。
{"title":"The Effect of Gracilis Tendon Preservation on Postoperative Knee Joint Stability and Muscle Strength in Arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Surgery.","authors":"Mehmet Ekinci, Taha Bedir Demir, Turker Sahinkaya, Sertac Yakal, Gokhan Polat, Bulent Bayraktar","doi":"10.1055/s-0044-1787829","DOIUrl":"10.1055/s-0044-1787829","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of our study is to evaluate preserving gracilis tendon in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) surgery and its effect to the flexion of the knee joint and tibial internal rotation strength and the stability of the knee. Patients who underwent primary single-bundle arthroscopic ACLR using all-inside technique and using hamstring tendon autograft were evaluated retrospectively. Patients were divided into two groups as gracilis preserved (St) and gracilis harvested (StG) groups. The International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, Lysholm, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score-Knee-related quality of life (KOOS-QOL) score, ACL-Return to Sport after Injury scale score were used to evaluate as postoperative functional scores at last follow-up. Anterior tibial translation was evaluated using the KT-1000 device. Knee joint flexion, extension, and internal rotation strength were evaluated using isokinetic dynamometer. Dynamic balance performances were measured using the Biodex Balance System. There were 24 patients in the St group and 23 patients in the StG group. Demographic data and clinical results showed no significant difference. Anteroposterior movement of the tibia was found to be significantly higher in the StG group than in the St group in measurements at 89 and 134 N, respectively (<i>p</i> = 0.01 and <0.001). No statistically significant difference was found between both standard and deep flexor and extensor and internal rotator strength. No statistically significant difference was found in the amount of total, anteroposterior, and mediolateral balance deficit between the two groups. Additional gracilis harvesting does not have a negative effect on both standard and deep knee flexion, and tibial internal rotation strength compared with the St group. Although semitendinosus and StG group showed significantly more anterior tibial translation, there was no significant difference in clinical and dynamic stability measurements.</p>","PeriodicalId":48798,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Knee Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"843-850"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141428033","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
In most previous studies investigating return to preinjury level of sport (RTPS) after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), whether patients continue aiming for RTPS not only before but also after ACLR was unclear because environmental and social factors were not considered. Herein, we aimed to evaluate factors associated with RTPS among athletes who desired to achieve RTPS even after ACLR, excluding patients who no longer desire this goal owing to environmental and social factors. Ninety-two patients who underwent primary double-bundle ACLR with a minimum 2-year follow-up and desired to achieve RTPS before surgery were retrospectively enrolled. Twelve (13%) patients who no longer desired to achieve RTPS after ACLR owing to environmental and social factors were excluded. Sixty-nine patients were included in the final cohort. At the final follow-up, the patients were split into two groups: those who achieved (R group) or did not achieve (N group) RTPS based on patient self-assessment. The Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and Lysholm scores were also determined. The anterior tibial translation in the Lachman test and acceleration and external rotational angular velocity (ERAV) in the pivot shift test were measured at the hardware removal operation. Significant differences were observed for preinjury level of sports between the groups (p < 0.05). The rate of RTPS in competitive athletes was lower than that in recreational athletes (20/46: 43% vs. 16/22: 73%; p =.037). Lysholm score, KOOS symptom, pain, and quality of life showed higher values in the R group than in the N group (p < 0.050). Acceleration was significantly lower in the R group than in the N group (p = 0.028). Competitive level of sports is a risk factor for failure to achieve RTPS. The postoperative functional outcomes in the group that achieved RTPS showed more favorable results. These results provide important information to enable the surgeons to consider the appropriate surgical plan for competitive athletes who desire to achieve RTPS after ACLR.
{"title":"Factors Associated with Return to Sport After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Focus on Athletes Who Desire Preinjury Level of Sport.","authors":"Yusuke Kawanishi, Makoto Kobayashi, Sanshiro Yasuma, Hiroaki Fukushima, Jiro Kato, Atsunori Murase, Tetsuya Takenaga, Masahito Yoshida, Gen Kuroyanagi, Yohei Kawaguchi, Hideki Murakami, Masahiro Nozaki","doi":"10.1055/a-2333-1490","DOIUrl":"10.1055/a-2333-1490","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In most previous studies investigating return to preinjury level of sport (RTPS) after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), whether patients continue aiming for RTPS not only before but also after ACLR was unclear because environmental and social factors were not considered. Herein, we aimed to evaluate factors associated with RTPS among athletes who desired to achieve RTPS even after ACLR, excluding patients who no longer desire this goal owing to environmental and social factors. Ninety-two patients who underwent primary double-bundle ACLR with a minimum 2-year follow-up and desired to achieve RTPS before surgery were retrospectively enrolled. Twelve (13%) patients who no longer desired to achieve RTPS after ACLR owing to environmental and social factors were excluded. Sixty-nine patients were included in the final cohort. At the final follow-up, the patients were split into two groups: those who achieved (R group) or did not achieve (N group) RTPS based on patient self-assessment. The Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and Lysholm scores were also determined. The anterior tibial translation in the Lachman test and acceleration and external rotational angular velocity (ERAV) in the pivot shift test were measured at the hardware removal operation. Significant differences were observed for preinjury level of sports between the groups (<i>p</i> < 0.05). The rate of RTPS in competitive athletes was lower than that in recreational athletes (20/46: 43% vs. 16/22: 73%; <i>p</i> =.037). Lysholm score, KOOS symptom, pain, and quality of life showed higher values in the R group than in the N group (<i>p</i> < 0.050). Acceleration was significantly lower in the R group than in the N group (<i>p</i> = 0.028). Competitive level of sports is a risk factor for failure to achieve RTPS. The postoperative functional outcomes in the group that achieved RTPS showed more favorable results. These results provide important information to enable the surgeons to consider the appropriate surgical plan for competitive athletes who desire to achieve RTPS after ACLR.</p>","PeriodicalId":48798,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Knee Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"856-863"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141093292","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Alexander J Nedopil, Anand Singh Dhaliwal, Antonio Klasan, Stephen M Howell, Maury L Hull
When performing caliper-verified kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty (KA TKA) in the osteoarthritic (OA) knee with valgus deformity, an elongated medial collateral ligament (MCL) could result in a valgus setting of the tibial component. The present study analyzed KA TKA in patients with valgus deformities (i.e., tibiofemoral angle > 10 degrees of valgus) and determined (1) the occurrence of radiographic MCL elongation, (2) the incidence of lateral collateral ligament (LCL) and posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) release and the use of constrained components, and (3) whether the 1-year Forgotten Joint Score (FJS), Oxford Knee Score (OKS), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (KOOS JR), and Likert satisfaction score were comparable to KA TKAs for OA deformities ≤10 degrees of valgus. One hundred and two consecutive patients who underwent KA TKA by a single surgeon were analyzed radiographically and clinically at a minimum follow-up of 1 year. Radiographic MCL elongation was identified by a greater than 1 degree of valgus orientation of the tibial component relative to the OA tibial joint line. Twenty-six patients had a radiographic anatomic tibiofemoral angle greater than 10 degrees of valgus (range of OA deformity: 11-23 degrees of valgus). Seventy-six had an OA deformity ≤10 degrees of valgus (10-degree valgus to -14-degree varus). No patient had MCL elongation or a ligament release, or required constrained components. The median FJS of 78, OKS of 42, and KOOS JR of 76, and the 85% satisfaction rate of the patients with greater than 10 degrees of OA valgus deformity were not significantly different from those with ≤10 degrees of OA valgus deformity (p ≥ 0.17). Because MCL elongation was not detected in OA deformities up to 23 degrees of valgus, the risk of under-correcting the valgus deformity leading to instability and poor outcome scores is low when performing KA TKA using primary components without releasing the LCL and/or PCL. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:: IV.
目的:在对伴有外翻畸形的骨关节炎(OA)膝关节进行卡尺验证的运动学配准全膝关节置换术(KA TKA)时,内侧副韧带(MCL)的拉长可能会导致胫骨组件的外翻设置。本研究分析了膝关节外翻畸形患者的 KA TKA(即、2)外侧副韧带(LCL)和后交叉韧带(PCL)松解的发生率以及受限组件的使用情况、3)对于髋关节外翻≤10°的OA畸形,一年的 "遗忘关节评分"(FJS)、"牛津膝关节评分"(OKS)、"膝关节损伤和骨关节炎关节置换术结果评分"(KOOS JR)和Likert满意度评分是否与KA TKAs相当。方法:对由一名外科医生实施 KA TKA 的 112 名连续患者进行了至少 1 年的放射学和临床随访分析。胫骨组件相对于OA胫骨关节线的外翻方向大于1°,即可确定MCL的影像学伸长:26名患者的胫股关节放射解剖角度大于10°外翻(OA畸形范围为11°至23°外翻)。76名患者的OA畸形≤10°外翻(10°外翻至-14°内翻)。没有患者出现 MCL 拉长、韧带松解或需要约束组件。OA外翻畸形大于10°的患者的FJS中位数为78,OKS中位数为42,KOOS JR中位数为76,满意率为85%,与OA外翻畸形小于10°的患者相比无显著差异(P≥0.17):由于在外翻23°以下的OA畸形中未检测到MCL伸长,因此在不释放LCL和/或PCL的情况下使用主组件进行KA TKA手术时,外翻畸形矫正不足导致不稳定和不良结果评分的风险很低。
{"title":"No Radiographic Evidence of Medial Collateral Ligament Elongation in Valgus Osteoarthritic Knees Enables Treatment with Kinematically Aligned Total Knee Arthroplasty.","authors":"Alexander J Nedopil, Anand Singh Dhaliwal, Antonio Klasan, Stephen M Howell, Maury L Hull","doi":"10.1055/a-2395-6831","DOIUrl":"10.1055/a-2395-6831","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>When performing caliper-verified kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty (KA TKA) in the osteoarthritic (OA) knee with valgus deformity, an elongated medial collateral ligament (MCL) could result in a valgus setting of the tibial component. The present study analyzed KA TKA in patients with valgus deformities (i.e., tibiofemoral angle > 10 degrees of valgus) and determined (1) the occurrence of radiographic MCL elongation, (2) the incidence of lateral collateral ligament (LCL) and posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) release and the use of constrained components, and (3) whether the 1-year Forgotten Joint Score (FJS), Oxford Knee Score (OKS), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (KOOS JR), and Likert satisfaction score were comparable to KA TKAs for OA deformities ≤10 degrees of valgus. One hundred and two consecutive patients who underwent KA TKA by a single surgeon were analyzed radiographically and clinically at a minimum follow-up of 1 year. Radiographic MCL elongation was identified by a greater than 1 degree of valgus orientation of the tibial component relative to the OA tibial joint line. Twenty-six patients had a radiographic anatomic tibiofemoral angle greater than 10 degrees of valgus (range of OA deformity: 11-23 degrees of valgus). Seventy-six had an OA deformity ≤10 degrees of valgus (10-degree valgus to -14-degree varus). No patient had MCL elongation or a ligament release, or required constrained components. The median FJS of 78, OKS of 42, and KOOS JR of 76, and the 85% satisfaction rate of the patients with greater than 10 degrees of OA valgus deformity were not significantly different from those with ≤10 degrees of OA valgus deformity (<i>p</i> ≥ 0.17). Because MCL elongation was not detected in OA deformities up to 23 degrees of valgus, the risk of under-correcting the valgus deformity leading to instability and poor outcome scores is low when performing KA TKA using primary components without releasing the LCL and/or PCL. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:: IV.</p>","PeriodicalId":48798,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Knee Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142009761","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pier Francesco Indelli, Giuseppe Petralia, Stefano Ghirardelli, Pieralberto Valpiana, Giuseppe Aloisi, Andrea Giordano Salvi, Salvatore Risitano
The use of alternative alignments in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has recently been increasing in popularity: many of these alignments have been included in the broad spectrum of "kinematic alignment." This alternative approach was recommended to increase patients' satisfaction since many studies based on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) showed that every fifth patient is not satisfied with the surgical outcome. In fact, the original kinematic alignment technique was designed as a "pure resurfacing" technique, maintaining the preoperative axes (flexion-extension and axial rotation) of the knee. In adjunct, many new classifications of the preoperative limb deformity have been proposed to include a large range of knee anatomies, few of them very atypical. Following those classifications, many surgeons aimed for a reproduction of unusual anatomies putting in jeopardy the survivorship of the implant according to the classical "dogma" of a poor knee kinematics and TKA biomechanics if the final hip-knee-ankle (HKA) axis was not kept within 5 degrees from neutral. This article reviews the literature supporting the choice of setting alignment boundaries in TKA when surgeons are interested in reproducing the constitutional knee anatomy of the patient within a safe range.
{"title":"Boundaries in Kinematic Alignment: Why, When, and How.","authors":"Pier Francesco Indelli, Giuseppe Petralia, Stefano Ghirardelli, Pieralberto Valpiana, Giuseppe Aloisi, Andrea Giordano Salvi, Salvatore Risitano","doi":"10.1055/a-2395-6935","DOIUrl":"10.1055/a-2395-6935","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The use of alternative alignments in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has recently been increasing in popularity: many of these alignments have been included in the broad spectrum of \"kinematic alignment.\" This alternative approach was recommended to increase patients' satisfaction since many studies based on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) showed that every fifth patient is not satisfied with the surgical outcome. In fact, the original kinematic alignment technique was designed as a \"pure resurfacing\" technique, maintaining the preoperative axes (flexion-extension and axial rotation) of the knee. In adjunct, many new classifications of the preoperative limb deformity have been proposed to include a large range of knee anatomies, few of them very atypical. Following those classifications, many surgeons aimed for a reproduction of unusual anatomies putting in jeopardy the survivorship of the implant according to the classical \"dogma\" of a poor knee kinematics and TKA biomechanics if the final hip-knee-ankle (HKA) axis was not kept within 5 degrees from neutral. This article reviews the literature supporting the choice of setting alignment boundaries in TKA when surgeons are interested in reproducing the constitutional knee anatomy of the patient within a safe range.</p>","PeriodicalId":48798,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Knee Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142009760","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Gabrielle Swartz,Sean Bonanni,Daniel Hameed,Jeremy Dubin,Sandeep S Bains,Deepak V Patel,Michael A Mont,Ronald E Delanois,Giles R Scuderi
Patellar tendon rupture following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a rare, but devastating complication. These injuries occur most frequently in the acute period following TKA due to trauma to the knee. Patellar tendon ruptures that disrupt the extensor mechanism create a marked functional deficit, impacting every facet of daily life. In complete ruptures of the patellar tendon, repair or reconstruction is typically indicated; however, complication rates following intervention remain high, between 25 to 63%. Operative intervention remains the mainstay of treatment, with only certain specific situations where nonoperative intervention is appropriate. Operative treatments include repair with or without augmentation or reconstruction. Augmentation does reduce the high risk of complications, bringing rates down from 63 to 25%. Augmentation options include autografts, allografts, synthetic grafts, or synthetic meshes. Despite advancements, outcomes are unpredictable, and complications are common, highlighting the need for further research to improve treatment protocols. Operative techniques are chosen based on the acuity, location of disruption, and status of the residual soft tissues. This article provides an overview of patellar tendon ruptures following TKA, the various treatment options, and the recommendations of the senior authors for each common type of patellar tendon injury encountered.
{"title":"Patellar Tendon Ruptures after Total Knee Arthroplasty.","authors":"Gabrielle Swartz,Sean Bonanni,Daniel Hameed,Jeremy Dubin,Sandeep S Bains,Deepak V Patel,Michael A Mont,Ronald E Delanois,Giles R Scuderi","doi":"10.1055/a-2413-3962","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2413-3962","url":null,"abstract":"Patellar tendon rupture following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a rare, but devastating complication. These injuries occur most frequently in the acute period following TKA due to trauma to the knee. Patellar tendon ruptures that disrupt the extensor mechanism create a marked functional deficit, impacting every facet of daily life. In complete ruptures of the patellar tendon, repair or reconstruction is typically indicated; however, complication rates following intervention remain high, between 25 to 63%. Operative intervention remains the mainstay of treatment, with only certain specific situations where nonoperative intervention is appropriate. Operative treatments include repair with or without augmentation or reconstruction. Augmentation does reduce the high risk of complications, bringing rates down from 63 to 25%. Augmentation options include autografts, allografts, synthetic grafts, or synthetic meshes. Despite advancements, outcomes are unpredictable, and complications are common, highlighting the need for further research to improve treatment protocols. Operative techniques are chosen based on the acuity, location of disruption, and status of the residual soft tissues. This article provides an overview of patellar tendon ruptures following TKA, the various treatment options, and the recommendations of the senior authors for each common type of patellar tendon injury encountered.","PeriodicalId":48798,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Knee Surgery","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142205692","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
David E DeMik,Juan David Lizcano,Emily Jimenez,Kyle Mullen,Jess H Lonner,Chad A Krueger
Background Extensor mechanism injury (EMI) following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a potentially catastrophic complication and may lead to significant morbidity or need for revision reconstructive procedures. Patella resurfacing (PR), while commonly performed during TKA, reduces overall patella bone stock and may increase the risk of EMI after TKA. The purpose of this study was to assess if patellar resurfacing (PR) in elderly patients raises the risk for subsequent EMI. Methods The American Joint Replacement Registry (AJRR) was queried to identify Medicare patients ≥65 years old undergoing primary elective TKA for osteoarthritis between January 2012 and March 2020. Patient age, sex, and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) were collected. Records were subsequently merged with Medicare claims records and evaluated for the occurrence of patella fracture, quadriceps tendon rupture, or patellar tendon rupture based on ICD-9/10 diagnosis codes within 2 years of TKA. Patients were stratified based on whether PR occurred or not (NR). Logistic regression was used to determine the association between PR and EMI. Results A total of 453,828 TKA were eligible for inclusion and 428,644 (94.45%) underwent PR. The incidence of PR decreased from 96.06% in 2012 to 92.35% in 2022 (p<0.001). Patients undergoing PR were more often female (60.93% vs 58.50%; p<0.001) and had a lower mean CCI (3.09 [1.10] vs. 3.16 [1.20]; p<0.001). Odds for EMI did not differ based on whether PR was performed (OR: 0.85 [0.65-1.11]; p=0.2246). Increasing age (OR: 1.06 [1.05-1.07], p<0.0001]) and CCI (OR: 1.06 [0.95-1.19], p=0.0009) were associated with EMI. Conclusions PR is commonly performed during TKA in the United States and was not found to increase odds for EMI within 2 years of TKA in patients ≥65 years old. Increased age and medical comorbidity were associated with higher odds for subsequent EMI.
{"title":"Does Resurfacing the Patella Increase the Risk of Extensor Mechanism Injury Within the First Two Years After Total Knee Arthroplasty?","authors":"David E DeMik,Juan David Lizcano,Emily Jimenez,Kyle Mullen,Jess H Lonner,Chad A Krueger","doi":"10.1055/a-2413-3876","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2413-3876","url":null,"abstract":"Background Extensor mechanism injury (EMI) following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a potentially catastrophic complication and may lead to significant morbidity or need for revision reconstructive procedures. Patella resurfacing (PR), while commonly performed during TKA, reduces overall patella bone stock and may increase the risk of EMI after TKA. The purpose of this study was to assess if patellar resurfacing (PR) in elderly patients raises the risk for subsequent EMI. Methods The American Joint Replacement Registry (AJRR) was queried to identify Medicare patients ≥65 years old undergoing primary elective TKA for osteoarthritis between January 2012 and March 2020. Patient age, sex, and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) were collected. Records were subsequently merged with Medicare claims records and evaluated for the occurrence of patella fracture, quadriceps tendon rupture, or patellar tendon rupture based on ICD-9/10 diagnosis codes within 2 years of TKA. Patients were stratified based on whether PR occurred or not (NR). Logistic regression was used to determine the association between PR and EMI. Results A total of 453,828 TKA were eligible for inclusion and 428,644 (94.45%) underwent PR. The incidence of PR decreased from 96.06% in 2012 to 92.35% in 2022 (p<0.001). Patients undergoing PR were more often female (60.93% vs 58.50%; p<0.001) and had a lower mean CCI (3.09 [1.10] vs. 3.16 [1.20]; p<0.001). Odds for EMI did not differ based on whether PR was performed (OR: 0.85 [0.65-1.11]; p=0.2246). Increasing age (OR: 1.06 [1.05-1.07], p<0.0001]) and CCI (OR: 1.06 [0.95-1.19], p=0.0009) were associated with EMI. Conclusions PR is commonly performed during TKA in the United States and was not found to increase odds for EMI within 2 years of TKA in patients ≥65 years old. Increased age and medical comorbidity were associated with higher odds for subsequent EMI.","PeriodicalId":48798,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Knee Surgery","volume":"57 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142205693","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Luke Schwartz, Rown Parola, Abhishek Ganta, Sanjit Konda, Steven Rivero, Kenneth A. Egol
The purpose of this study was to report on the treatment, results, and longer-term outcomes of patients who sustained a tibial plateau fracture with an associated leg compartment syndrome (CS). A total of 766 patients who sustained 766 tibial plateau fractures met inclusion criteria. Fourteen patients (1.8%) were diagnosed with CS in association with a tibial plateau fracture during their initial hospitalization, 13 at the time of presentation and 1 delayed. The treatment protocol consisted of initial external fixation and fasciotomy, followed by irrigation and debridement, and eventual closure. Fasciotomy cases included 2/14 (14.3%) single incision approaches and 12/14 (85.7%) dual incision approaches. Operative treatment of the tibial plateau fracture was performed at the time of final closure or once soft tissues were permitted. One case of CS that developed following definitive fixation was treated with fasciotomy and delayed primary closure after initial stabilization. Ten (71.4%) were available at 1-year follow-up. We compared these 10 cases to the patients with operative tibial plateau fractures without CS to assess for surgical, radiographic, clinical, and functional outcomes. We used a propensity match based on age, body mass index, sex, Charleson comorbidity index, and fracture type to reduce the presence of confounding biases. Standard statistical methods were employed. Those in the CS cohort were younger males (p < 0.05). At latest follow-up, function did not differ between those in the CS group compared with the non-CS cohort (p > 0.05). Clinically, knee flexion (130.7 vs. 126; p = 0.548), residual depression (0.5 vs. 0.2; p = 0.365), knee alignment (87.7 vs. 88.3; p = 0.470), and visual analog scale pain scores (3.0 vs. 2.4; p = 0.763) did not differ between the cohorts. Although infection was higher in the CS cohort, the overall complication rates did not differ between the CS patients and non-CS cohort (p > 0.05). Early identification and standardized treatment protocols for the management of CS that develops in association with a tibial plateau fracture lead to outcome scores that were not significantly different from patients who did not develop CS.
本研究旨在报告胫骨平台骨折伴有腿部椎间隙综合征(CS)患者的治疗方法、结果和长期疗效。共有 766 名胫骨平台骨折患者符合纳入标准。14名患者(1.8%)在初次住院时被诊断为胫骨平台骨折伴有CS,13名患者在就诊时被诊断为CS,1名患者延迟诊断。治疗方案包括最初的外固定和筋膜切开术,然后进行冲洗和清创,最后缝合。筋膜切开术包括2/14(14.3%)例单切口手术和12/14(85.7%)例双切口手术。胫骨平台骨折的手术治疗在最终闭合时或软组织允许时进行。有一例在最终固定后发生的 CS,在初步稳定后进行了筋膜切开术和延迟初次闭合术。10例(71.4%)患者接受了为期1年的随访。我们将这 10 例患者与未发生 CS 的胫骨平台骨折手术患者进行了比较,以评估手术、影像学、临床和功能结果。我们根据年龄、体重指数、性别、查尔斯恩合并症指数和骨折类型进行倾向匹配,以减少混杂偏差的存在。我们采用了标准的统计方法。CS队列中的男性更年轻(P P > 0.05)。临床上,两组患者的膝关节屈曲度(130.7 vs. 126;p = 0.548)、残余凹陷(0.5 vs. 0.2;p = 0.365)、膝关节对齐度(87.7 vs. 88.3;p = 0.470)和视觉模拟量表疼痛评分(3.0 vs. 2.4;p = 0.763)均无差异。虽然CS组感染率较高,但CS患者与非CS组的总体并发症发生率并无差异(P > 0.05)。对于胫骨平台骨折伴发的CS,通过早期识别和标准化治疗方案的处理,其结果评分与未发生CS的患者无显著差异。
{"title":"Compartment Syndrome in Association with Tibial Plateau Fracture: Standardized Protocols Ensure Optimal Outcomes","authors":"Luke Schwartz, Rown Parola, Abhishek Ganta, Sanjit Konda, Steven Rivero, Kenneth A. Egol","doi":"10.1055/s-0044-1790282","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1790282","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The purpose of this study was to report on the treatment, results, and longer-term outcomes of patients who sustained a tibial plateau fracture with an associated leg compartment syndrome (CS). A total of 766 patients who sustained 766 tibial plateau fractures met inclusion criteria. Fourteen patients (1.8%) were diagnosed with CS in association with a tibial plateau fracture during their initial hospitalization, 13 at the time of presentation and 1 delayed. The treatment protocol consisted of initial external fixation and fasciotomy, followed by irrigation and debridement, and eventual closure. Fasciotomy cases included 2/14 (14.3%) single incision approaches and 12/14 (85.7%) dual incision approaches. Operative treatment of the tibial plateau fracture was performed at the time of final closure or once soft tissues were permitted. One case of CS that developed following definitive fixation was treated with fasciotomy and delayed primary closure after initial stabilization. Ten (71.4%) were available at 1-year follow-up. We compared these 10 cases to the patients with operative tibial plateau fractures without CS to assess for surgical, radiographic, clinical, and functional outcomes. We used a propensity match based on age, body mass index, sex, Charleson comorbidity index, and fracture type to reduce the presence of confounding biases. Standard statistical methods were employed. Those in the CS cohort were younger males (<i>p</i> < 0.05). At latest follow-up, function did not differ between those in the CS group compared with the non-CS cohort (<i>p</i> > 0.05). Clinically, knee flexion (130.7 vs. 126; <i>p</i> = 0.548), residual depression (0.5 vs. 0.2; <i>p</i> = 0.365), knee alignment (87.7 vs. 88.3; <i>p</i> = 0.470), and visual analog scale pain scores (3.0 vs. 2.4; <i>p</i> = 0.763) did not differ between the cohorts. Although infection was higher in the CS cohort, the overall complication rates did not differ between the CS patients and non-CS cohort (<i>p</i> > 0.05). Early identification and standardized treatment protocols for the management of CS that develops in association with a tibial plateau fracture lead to outcome scores that were not significantly different from patients who did not develop CS.</p> ","PeriodicalId":48798,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Knee Surgery","volume":"61 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142205694","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-01Epub Date: 2024-04-27DOI: 10.1055/a-2315-7873
Armando Del Prete, Piero Franco, Matteo Innocenti, Fabrizio Matassi, Filippo Leggieri, Rosario Jr Sagliocco, Roberto Civinini
Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is a challenging surgery occurring in 3 to 24% of primary reconstructions. A meticulous planning to study the precise size and location of both femoral and tibial bone tunnels is mandatory. The aim of the study was to evaluate the intra- and interoperator differences in the decision-making process between experienced surgeons after they were asked to make preoperative planning for ACL revision reconstruction with the use of both the computed tomography (CT) scan and a three-dimensional (3D)-printed model of the knee. Data collected from 23 consecutive patients undergoing revision of ACLR for graft failure at a single institute between September 2018 and February 2020 were prospectively reviewed. The double-blinded collected data were presented to three board-certificate attending surgeons. Surgeons were asked to decide whether to perform one-stage or two-stage revision ACLR based on the evaluation of the CT scan images and the 3D-printed custom-made models at two different rounds, T0 and T1, respectively, 7 days apart one from the other. Interoperator consensus following technical mistake was 52% at T0 and 56% at T1 using the CT scans, meanwhile concordance was 95% at T0 and 94% at T1 using the 3D models. Concordance between surgeons following new knee injury was 66% at T0 and 70% at T1 using CT scans, while concordance was 96% both at T0 and T1 using 3D models. Intraoperative variability using 3D models was extremely low: concordance at T0 and T1 was 98%. McNemar test showed a statistical significance in the use of 3D model for preoperative planning (p < 0.005). 3D-printed model reliability resulted to be higher compared with CT as intraoperator surgery technique selection was not modified throughout time from T0 to T1 (p < 0.005). The use of 3D-printed models had the most impact when evaluating femoral and tibial tunnels, resulting to be a useful instrument during preoperative planning of revision ACLR between attending surgeons with medium-high workflow.
{"title":"Computer Patient-Specific 3D Modeling and Custom-Made Guides for Revision ACL Surgery.","authors":"Armando Del Prete, Piero Franco, Matteo Innocenti, Fabrizio Matassi, Filippo Leggieri, Rosario Jr Sagliocco, Roberto Civinini","doi":"10.1055/a-2315-7873","DOIUrl":"10.1055/a-2315-7873","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is a challenging surgery occurring in 3 to 24% of primary reconstructions. A meticulous planning to study the precise size and location of both femoral and tibial bone tunnels is mandatory. The aim of the study was to evaluate the intra- and interoperator differences in the decision-making process between experienced surgeons after they were asked to make preoperative planning for ACL revision reconstruction with the use of both the computed tomography (CT) scan and a three-dimensional (3D)-printed model of the knee. Data collected from 23 consecutive patients undergoing revision of ACLR for graft failure at a single institute between September 2018 and February 2020 were prospectively reviewed. The double-blinded collected data were presented to three board-certificate attending surgeons. Surgeons were asked to decide whether to perform one-stage or two-stage revision ACLR based on the evaluation of the CT scan images and the 3D-printed custom-made models at two different rounds, T0 and T1, respectively, 7 days apart one from the other. Interoperator consensus following technical mistake was 52% at T0 and 56% at T1 using the CT scans, meanwhile concordance was 95% at T0 and 94% at T1 using the 3D models. Concordance between surgeons following new knee injury was 66% at T0 and 70% at T1 using CT scans, while concordance was 96% both at T0 and T1 using 3D models. Intraoperative variability using 3D models was extremely low: concordance at T0 and T1 was 98%. McNemar test showed a statistical significance in the use of 3D model for preoperative planning (<i>p</i> < 0.005). 3D-printed model reliability resulted to be higher compared with CT as intraoperator surgery technique selection was not modified throughout time from T0 to T1 (<i>p</i> < 0.005). The use of 3D-printed models had the most impact when evaluating femoral and tibial tunnels, resulting to be a useful instrument during preoperative planning of revision ACLR between attending surgeons with medium-high workflow.</p>","PeriodicalId":48798,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Knee Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"804-811"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140856656","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-01Epub Date: 2024-04-27DOI: 10.1055/a-2315-7691
Derrick M Knapik, Varun Gopinatth, Garrett R Jackson, Robert F LaPrade, Jorge Chahla, Robert H Brophy, Matthew J Matava, Matthew V Smith
While infrequently reported, isolated injuries to the proximal tibiofibular (TF) joint primarily occur in young, athletic patients participating in sporting activities requiring explosive, high-impact movements, increasing the risk for potential twisting injuries, especially across a hyperflexed knee. The proximal TF joint is stabilized by bony, muscular and ligamentous structures, including both the anterior and posterior proximal TF complexes, with the anterior complex providing more robust stability. Proximal TF injuries frequently involve anterior and lateral displacement of the proximal fibula relative to its native articulation with the tibia. Proper diagnosis is dependent on careful and meticulous history and physical examination, as missed injuries are common, leading to the potential for continued pain, weakness and disability, especially in athletic patients. While spontaneous joint reduction has been reported, injuries may require formal closed reduction, with irreducible and chronic injuries requiring open reduction and stabilization, with recent investigations reporting satisfactory outcomes following anatomic reconstruction of the proximal TF ligament.
{"title":"Isolated, Proximal Tibiofibular Injuries in Athletic Patients: A Critical Analysis Review.","authors":"Derrick M Knapik, Varun Gopinatth, Garrett R Jackson, Robert F LaPrade, Jorge Chahla, Robert H Brophy, Matthew J Matava, Matthew V Smith","doi":"10.1055/a-2315-7691","DOIUrl":"10.1055/a-2315-7691","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>While infrequently reported, isolated injuries to the proximal tibiofibular (TF) joint primarily occur in young, athletic patients participating in sporting activities requiring explosive, high-impact movements, increasing the risk for potential twisting injuries, especially across a hyperflexed knee. The proximal TF joint is stabilized by bony, muscular and ligamentous structures, including both the anterior and posterior proximal TF complexes, with the anterior complex providing more robust stability. Proximal TF injuries frequently involve anterior and lateral displacement of the proximal fibula relative to its native articulation with the tibia. Proper diagnosis is dependent on careful and meticulous history and physical examination, as missed injuries are common, leading to the potential for continued pain, weakness and disability, especially in athletic patients. While spontaneous joint reduction has been reported, injuries may require formal closed reduction, with irreducible and chronic injuries requiring open reduction and stabilization, with recent investigations reporting satisfactory outcomes following anatomic reconstruction of the proximal TF ligament.</p>","PeriodicalId":48798,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Knee Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"773-783"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140872398","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}