Pub Date : 2025-03-11eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.5334/aogh.4543
Chelsea M McGuire, Nikolina Boskovic, Bolatito Betty Fatusin, Pius Ameh, Taylor Reed, Priyanka Jethwani, David Flynn, Jo Cooke, Robert Saper
Background: Effective and scalable strategies are needed to develop health research capacity in low- and middle‑income countries (LMICs). Health research capacity strengthening (HRCS) focuses on boosting production and utilization of health research, with clinicians as key target participants. Despite the increased prevalence of virtual HRCS programs, there has been no review of the evidence for those targeting LMIC clinicians to date. Objective: This review characterizes the use of virtual tools in HRCS programs for clinicians in LMICs and describes the impacts, facilitators, and barriers associated with these programs. Methods: Following our protocol (PROSPERO; CRD42020152510), we employed an integrative review methodology. We adapted Cooke's Research Capacity Development for Impact framework by adding "equity" as a new domain and used it to evaluate programmatic impacts. We retrieved relevant articles from five databases and gray literature. Included articles were extracted and stratified by degree of virtual delivery. We analyzed virtual tool usage via content analysis. Using NVivo, we coded until theoretical saturation and analyzed data using the constant comparison method. Findings: From 1397 articles, 58 met inclusion criteria. Most programs were hybrid, and e‑courses were the most used virtual tool. Articles described impacts across all framework domains; the most discussed were skills and confidence building. Facilitators included user‑friendly platforms, interactive content, and strategies to improve program access, including financial and technological support. Some programs incorporated hybrid strategies to foster trust among participants and virtual mentors. Barriers included a lack of or an unfavorable local research culture. Conclusions: Recommendations from this review may guide the design and implementation of virtual HRCS programs for LMIC clinicians. These include selecting well‑fitted program participants, intentionally designing program structure and content, conducting needs assessments or pilots, incorporating equity as a programmatic target, ensuring longitudinal program evaluation and monitoring, and utilizing a comprehensive conceptualization of program sustainability.
{"title":"Virtual Health Research Capacity Strengthening in Low- and Middle‑Income Countries: A Systematic Integrative Review.","authors":"Chelsea M McGuire, Nikolina Boskovic, Bolatito Betty Fatusin, Pius Ameh, Taylor Reed, Priyanka Jethwani, David Flynn, Jo Cooke, Robert Saper","doi":"10.5334/aogh.4543","DOIUrl":"10.5334/aogh.4543","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Background:</i> Effective and scalable strategies are needed to develop health research capacity in low- and middle‑income countries (LMICs). Health research capacity strengthening (HRCS) focuses on boosting production and utilization of health research, with clinicians as key target participants. Despite the increased prevalence of virtual HRCS programs, there has been no review of the evidence for those targeting LMIC clinicians to date. <i>Objective:</i> This review characterizes the use of virtual tools in HRCS programs for clinicians in LMICs and describes the impacts, facilitators, and barriers associated with these programs. <i>Methods:</i> Following our protocol (PROSPERO; CRD42020152510), we employed an integrative review methodology. We adapted Cooke's Research Capacity Development for Impact framework by adding \"equity\" as a new domain and used it to evaluate programmatic impacts. We retrieved relevant articles from five databases and gray literature. Included articles were extracted and stratified by degree of virtual delivery. We analyzed virtual tool usage via content analysis. Using NVivo, we coded until theoretical saturation and analyzed data using the constant comparison method. <i>Findings:</i> From 1397 articles, 58 met inclusion criteria. Most programs were hybrid, and e‑courses were the most used virtual tool. Articles described impacts across all framework domains; the most discussed were skills and confidence building. Facilitators included user‑friendly platforms, interactive content, and strategies to improve program access, including financial and technological support. Some programs incorporated hybrid strategies to foster trust among participants and virtual mentors. Barriers included a lack of or an unfavorable local research culture. <i>Conclusions:</i> Recommendations from this review may guide the design and implementation of virtual HRCS programs for LMIC clinicians. These include selecting well‑fitted program participants, intentionally designing program structure and content, conducting needs assessments or pilots, incorporating equity as a programmatic target, ensuring longitudinal program evaluation and monitoring, and utilizing a comprehensive conceptualization of program sustainability.</p>","PeriodicalId":48857,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Global Health","volume":"91 1","pages":"14"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11908432/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143651483","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-03-10eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.5334/aogh.4627
Nicole E St Clair, Kristina Devi Singh-Verdeflor, Vanessa McFadden, Elizabeth Groothuis, Stephanie Lauden, Megan S McHenry, Stephen Merry, Stephen Warrick, Samantha L Wilson, James H Conway
Background: Participation in global health (GH) training experiences is common for US medical trainees (students, residents, and fellows). However, little is known about their experience of "culture shock" (CS), which frequently occurs during these transformative cross‑cultural immersions. Objectives: The objectives of this study include: (1) quantitatively measure medical trainee psychosocial responses to short‑term GH electives, (2) identify factors that influence their CS experiences, and (3) determine if the stage‑based CS conceptual framework applies to medical trainees. Methods: Undergraduate and graduate medical education trainees (UME and GME) who participated in short‑term GH electives between 2016 and 2020 were recruited across nine US institutions. Using a longitudinal survey method, we gathered data predeparture (demographics, resilience, perceived stress (PS), and CS assessments), every 5 days during the elective (CS, PS assessments, and training site conditions), and 30 days postreturn (perceptions of CS experiences). Analyses included summary statistics, linear regressions, and a linear mixed effects model (LMM). Findings: 252 trainees were enrolled, with 140 (56%) included in the LMM. The primary outcome was a culture shock profile (CSP) score, with 96% reporting CS. The only trainee‑specific factor that significantly increased CSP score was trainee type (UME > GME (+22%)). Several GH elective site‑specific factors significantly influenced CSP score (e.g., support network [-10%], role clarity [-11%], and overwhelmed by medical needs [+10%]). CS experiences were variable and did not progress in predictable, stage‑based fashions, which is discordant from common CS descriptions. Conclusions: Culture shock was a near‑universal, diverse experience during GH electives. On‑site training conditions and elective site host factors influenced CS more than trainee factors in this prepandemic cohort. Further research is required to (1) determine the optimal CS "balance" (i.e., promoting transformative learning while mitigating negative professional and personal impacts), (2) offer insight into harmful CS thresholds, (3) identify host perspectives, and (4) inform best practices for GH electives and global partnerships.
{"title":"Project PRIME (Psychosocial Response to International Medical Electives): Results from Medical Trainees.","authors":"Nicole E St Clair, Kristina Devi Singh-Verdeflor, Vanessa McFadden, Elizabeth Groothuis, Stephanie Lauden, Megan S McHenry, Stephen Merry, Stephen Warrick, Samantha L Wilson, James H Conway","doi":"10.5334/aogh.4627","DOIUrl":"10.5334/aogh.4627","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Background:</i> Participation in global health (GH) training experiences is common for US medical trainees (students, residents, and fellows). However, little is known about their experience of \"culture shock\" (CS), which frequently occurs during these transformative cross‑cultural immersions. <i>Objectives:</i> The objectives of this study include: (1) quantitatively measure medical trainee psychosocial responses to short‑term GH electives, (2) identify factors that influence their CS experiences, and (3) determine if the stage‑based CS conceptual framework applies to medical trainees. <i>Methods:</i> Undergraduate and graduate medical education trainees (UME and GME) who participated in short‑term GH electives between 2016 and 2020 were recruited across nine US institutions. Using a longitudinal survey method, we gathered data predeparture (demographics, resilience, perceived stress (PS), and CS assessments), every 5 days during the elective (CS, PS assessments, and training site conditions), and 30 days postreturn (perceptions of CS experiences). Analyses included summary statistics, linear regressions, and a linear mixed effects model (LMM). <i>Findings:</i> 252 trainees were enrolled, with 140 (56%) included in the LMM. The primary outcome was a culture shock profile (CSP) score, with 96% reporting CS. The only trainee‑specific factor that significantly increased CSP score was trainee type (UME > GME (+22%)). Several GH elective site‑specific factors significantly influenced CSP score (e.g., support network [-10%], role clarity [-11%], and overwhelmed by medical needs [+10%]). CS experiences were variable and did not progress in predictable, stage‑based fashions, which is discordant from common CS descriptions. <i>Conclusions:</i> Culture shock was a near‑universal, diverse experience during GH electives. On‑site training conditions and elective site host factors influenced CS more than trainee factors in this prepandemic cohort. Further research is required to (1) determine the optimal CS \"balance\" (i.e., promoting transformative learning while mitigating negative professional and personal impacts), (2) offer insight into harmful CS thresholds, (3) identify host perspectives, and (4) inform best practices for GH electives and global partnerships.</p>","PeriodicalId":48857,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Global Health","volume":"91 1","pages":"13"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11908413/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143651463","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-03-06eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.5334/aogh.4628
Sergio Cotugno, Elda De Vita, Luisa Frallonardo, Roberta Novara, Roberta Papagni, Muhammad Asaduzzaman, Francesco Vladimiro Segala, Nicola Veronese, Emanuele Nicastri, Anna Morea, Ferenc Balázs Farkas, Botond Lakatos, Roberta Iatta, Giovanni Putoto, Annalisa Saracino, Francesco Di Gennaro
Background: Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) and migration are two interlinked issues and both pose an escalating threat to global health. With an increasing trend, there are 281 million migrants globally, while AMR is contributing to over 5 million deaths annually, with a projected rise to 10 million by 2050 if left unaddressed. Both AMR and migration are multifaceted problems that extend beyond human health, involving animals, plants, and the environment-a fact highlighted by the One Health approach. Objective: The aim of this work is: (1) to examine the complex relationship between migration and AMR, drawing on epidemiological data, surveillance strategies, and healthcare access challenges and (2) to address an interventional strategy proposal. Methods: We performed a narrative review of the most updated literature about migration and AMR using three primary databases: PubMed, Scopus, and Embase. Findings: Migrants, particularly from low‑ and middle‑income countries, represent a unique group at increased risk of AMR due to factors such as overcrowded living conditions, limited access to healthcare, uncontrolled use of antibiotics, and high prevalence of AMR in origin countries. Studies reveal higher rates of AMR colonization and infection among migrants compared with native populations, with specific pathogens such as MRSA and multidrug‑resistant gram‑negative bacteria posing significant risks. Migratory conditions, socioeconomic vulnerability, and healthcare barriers contribute to this heightened risk. Conclusion: To address the intersection of migration and AMR, interventions must focus on improving living conditions, enhancing healthcare access, promoting appropriate antibiotic use, and strengthening microbiological surveillance. Multisectoral collaboration is essential to mitigate the spread of AMR and safeguard both migrant and global public health.
{"title":"Antimicrobial Resistance and Migration: Interrelation Between Two Hot Topics in Global Health.","authors":"Sergio Cotugno, Elda De Vita, Luisa Frallonardo, Roberta Novara, Roberta Papagni, Muhammad Asaduzzaman, Francesco Vladimiro Segala, Nicola Veronese, Emanuele Nicastri, Anna Morea, Ferenc Balázs Farkas, Botond Lakatos, Roberta Iatta, Giovanni Putoto, Annalisa Saracino, Francesco Di Gennaro","doi":"10.5334/aogh.4628","DOIUrl":"10.5334/aogh.4628","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Background:</i> Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) and migration are two interlinked issues and both pose an escalating threat to global health. With an increasing trend, there are 281 million migrants globally, while AMR is contributing to over 5 million deaths annually, with a projected rise to 10 million by 2050 if left unaddressed. Both AMR and migration are multifaceted problems that extend beyond human health, involving animals, plants, and the environment-a fact highlighted by the One Health approach. <i>Objective:</i> The aim of this work is: (1) to examine the complex relationship between migration and AMR, drawing on epidemiological data, surveillance strategies, and healthcare access challenges and (2) to address an interventional strategy proposal. <i>Methods:</i> We performed a narrative review of the most updated literature about migration and AMR using three primary databases: PubMed, Scopus, and Embase. <i>Findings:</i> Migrants, particularly from low‑ and middle‑income countries, represent a unique group at increased risk of AMR due to factors such as overcrowded living conditions, limited access to healthcare, uncontrolled use of antibiotics, and high prevalence of AMR in origin countries. Studies reveal higher rates of AMR colonization and infection among migrants compared with native populations, with specific pathogens such as MRSA and multidrug‑resistant gram‑negative bacteria posing significant risks. Migratory conditions, socioeconomic vulnerability, and healthcare barriers contribute to this heightened risk. <i>Conclusion:</i> To address the intersection of migration and AMR, interventions must focus on improving living conditions, enhancing healthcare access, promoting appropriate antibiotic use, and strengthening microbiological surveillance. Multisectoral collaboration is essential to mitigate the spread of AMR and safeguard both migrant and global public health.</p>","PeriodicalId":48857,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Global Health","volume":"91 1","pages":"12"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2025-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11887466/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143587751","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: There is widespread agreement on the potential of multisectoral action to address the social determinants of maternal health. We conducted an implementation research study in Meghalaya, a northeastern Indian state with a high burden of maternal mortality where the government initiated "Rescue Mission" to strengthen the health system and to address underlying determinants to improve maternal health indicators. The initiative was grounded in building state capability and decentralised leadership. Objective: We developed a theory of change and examined implementation barriers and enablers through an implementation research study with government and community actors and institutions. Methods: We conducted multiple rounds of qualitative data collection over a period of eighteen months across six districts. Participants included primary care providers in the public health system and frontline workers in thirty sampled facilities. We also interviewed officials across three government departments, observed meetings and met regularly in a feedback loop with government. Data were analysed thematically and synthesised according to pathways of change. Findings: The state institutionalised multisectoral collaboration across governance levels through building technical and adaptive leadership. Processes included joint meetings at the facility, district and state levels to develop action plans and facilitate collaboration, community engagement through frontline workers and decentralised use of data. Strength of participation by different sectors varied widely; non‑health cadres reported challenges such as being accountable to multiple departments. Political priority and administrative leadership were the key elements of the State's ability to implement a multisectoral approach. Overall, health outcomes improved and the State largely achieved its commitment to building technical skills, but also recognised the need for further investments to develop a sense of purpose amongst government officials. Conclusions: Meghalaya's experience in multisectoral collaboration demonstrates the potential of health systems reform grounded in a state capabilities enhancement approach, with a focus on participation and building decentralised leadership.
{"title":"<i>\"It's Everyone's Problem\":</i> Institutionalising Multisectoral Action for Maternal Health in Meghalaya, India.","authors":"Sapna Desai, Sharmada Sivaram, S Ramkumar, Patricia Dohtdong, Ankit Nanda, Sowmya Ramesh, Sampath Kumar","doi":"10.5334/aogh.4587","DOIUrl":"10.5334/aogh.4587","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Background:</i> There is widespread agreement on the potential of multisectoral action to address the social determinants of maternal health. We conducted an implementation research study in Meghalaya, a northeastern Indian state with a high burden of maternal mortality where the government initiated \"Rescue Mission\" to strengthen the health system and to address underlying determinants to improve maternal health indicators. The initiative was grounded in building state capability and decentralised leadership. <i>Objective:</i> We developed a theory of change and examined implementation barriers and enablers through an implementation research study with government and community actors and institutions. <i>Methods:</i> We conducted multiple rounds of qualitative data collection over a period of eighteen months across six districts. Participants included primary care providers in the public health system and frontline workers in thirty sampled facilities. We also interviewed officials across three government departments, observed meetings and met regularly in a feedback loop with government. Data were analysed thematically and synthesised according to pathways of change. <i>Findings:</i> The state institutionalised multisectoral collaboration across governance levels through building technical and adaptive leadership. Processes included joint meetings at the facility, district and state levels to develop action plans and facilitate collaboration, community engagement through frontline workers and decentralised use of data. Strength of participation by different sectors varied widely; non‑health cadres reported challenges such as being accountable to multiple departments. Political priority and administrative leadership were the key elements of the State's ability to implement a multisectoral approach. Overall, health outcomes improved and the State largely achieved its commitment to building technical skills, but also recognised the need for further investments to develop a sense of purpose amongst government officials. <i>Conclusions:</i> Meghalaya's experience in multisectoral collaboration demonstrates the potential of health systems reform grounded in a state capabilities enhancement approach, with a focus on participation and building decentralised leadership.</p>","PeriodicalId":48857,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Global Health","volume":"91 1","pages":"11"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11887465/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143587799","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-24eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.5334/aogh.4623
Budi Haryanto, Bin Jalaludin, Al Asyary, Nathaniel Roestandy, Fajar Nugraha
Background: Children in Indonesia are especially vulnerable to air pollution due to their developing respiratory systems and unique exposure patterns. As one of the top 50 nations most at risk from environmental degradation, Indonesia faces significant public health concerns, especially in rapidly urbanizing areas such as Greater Jakarta, where emissions from transportation contribute heavily to pollution. This study investigates the relationship between PM2.5 exposure and cases of asthma and pneumonia in children across Greater Jakarta's 11 cities and districts from 2020 to 2022, aiming to provide essential data for health planning and policy. Methods: The data were collected from NafasID's PM2.5 monitoring network and local health offices reporting monthly cases of asthma and pneumonia in children. Analytical methods included correlation and regression modeling to assess the association between air pollution and respiratory health across different regions. The results reveal a high number of respiratory disease, with 73,694 pneumonia and 15,825 asthma cases reported. Results: Average PM2.5 concentration in Greater Jakarta was 42.5 µg/m3, with notable variation between areas. Bekasi District recorded the highest levels, while North Jakarta was lower. Depok City showed the strongest correlation between PM2.5 and pneumonia (r = 0.61, p = 0.004), indicating a sharp increase in cases with rising PM2.5, while other areas showed weaker correlations. Asthma cases had weak-to-moderate correlations with PM2.5, which is largely nonsignificant, suggesting complex factors beyond outdoor air pollution may influence asthma. Conclusion: The findings highlight the critical need for improved air quality measures and targeted public health interventions. Addressing air pollution will be vital for reducing respiratory illness and supporting child health resilience in Indonesia's urban centers.
背景:印度尼西亚的儿童由于其正在发育的呼吸系统和独特的暴露方式,特别容易受到空气污染的影响。作为面临环境退化风险最大的50个国家之一,印度尼西亚面临着重大的公共卫生问题,特别是在大雅加达等快速城市化地区,交通排放严重造成污染。本研究调查了2020年至2022年大雅加达11个城市和地区的PM2.5暴露与儿童哮喘和肺炎病例之间的关系,旨在为卫生规划和政策提供重要数据。方法:数据来自NafasID的PM2.5监测网络和每月报告儿童哮喘和肺炎病例的地方卫生办事处。分析方法包括相关性和回归模型,以评估不同地区空气污染与呼吸系统健康之间的关系。结果显示,呼吸道疾病的发病率很高,报告了73,694例肺炎和15,825例哮喘病例。结果:大雅加达地区PM2.5平均浓度为42.5µg/m3,区域间差异显著。贝卡西地区的污染水平最高,而雅加达北部的污染水平较低。Depok市PM2.5与肺炎的相关性最强(r = 0.61, p = 0.004),表明PM2.5升高时病例急剧增加,而其他地区的相关性较弱。哮喘病例与PM2.5呈弱至中度相关性,但在很大程度上不显著,这表明室外空气污染以外的复杂因素可能影响哮喘。结论:研究结果强调了改善空气质量措施和有针对性的公共卫生干预措施的迫切需要。解决空气污染问题对于减少印度尼西亚城市中心的呼吸系统疾病和支持儿童健康复原力至关重要。
{"title":"Associations Between Ambient PM<sub>2.5</sub> Levels and Children's Pneumonia and Asthma During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Greater Jakarta (<i>Jabodetabek</i>).","authors":"Budi Haryanto, Bin Jalaludin, Al Asyary, Nathaniel Roestandy, Fajar Nugraha","doi":"10.5334/aogh.4623","DOIUrl":"10.5334/aogh.4623","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Background:</i> Children in Indonesia are especially vulnerable to air pollution due to their developing respiratory systems and unique exposure patterns. As one of the top 50 nations most at risk from environmental degradation, Indonesia faces significant public health concerns, especially in rapidly urbanizing areas such as Greater Jakarta, where emissions from transportation contribute heavily to pollution. This study investigates the relationship between PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposure and cases of asthma and pneumonia in children across Greater Jakarta's 11 cities and districts from 2020 to 2022, aiming to provide essential data for health planning and policy. <i>Methods:</i> The data were collected from NafasID's PM<sub>2.5</sub> monitoring network and local health offices reporting monthly cases of asthma and pneumonia in children. Analytical methods included correlation and regression modeling to assess the association between air pollution and respiratory health across different regions. The results reveal a high number of respiratory disease, with 73,694 pneumonia and 15,825 asthma cases reported. <i>Results:</i> Average PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentration in Greater Jakarta was 42.5 µg/m<sup>3</sup>, with notable variation between areas. Bekasi District recorded the highest levels, while North Jakarta was lower. Depok City showed the strongest correlation between PM<sub>2.5</sub> and pneumonia (<i>r</i> = 0.61, <i>p</i> = 0.004), indicating a sharp increase in cases with rising PM<sub>2.5</sub>, while other areas showed weaker correlations. Asthma cases had weak-to-moderate correlations with PM<sub>2.5</sub>, which is largely nonsignificant, suggesting complex factors beyond outdoor air pollution may influence asthma. <i>Conclusion:</i> The findings highlight the critical need for improved air quality measures and targeted public health interventions. Addressing air pollution will be vital for reducing respiratory illness and supporting child health resilience in Indonesia's urban centers.</p>","PeriodicalId":48857,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Global Health","volume":"91 1","pages":"10"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2025-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11869824/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143544154","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-06eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.5334/aogh.4503
Saumu Shabani, Bente Elisabeth Moen, Wakgari Deressa, Simon Henry Mamuya
Background: In Tanzania, iron and steel manufacturing industries are based on manual work with minor automation, as workers segregate scrap metals and add them to furnaces for melting. The workers here are exposed to hazardous conditions, posing a risk to their health. Objective: To determine the prevalence of occupational injuries and possible predictors for injuries among workers in the iron and steel industries in Tanzania. Methods: The cross‑sectional study was conducted in 2022 in Tanzania. Workers from the production lines in four iron and steel factories participated in the study. The data were collected by interviews, using a structured questionnaire modified from the International Labour Organization (ILO) manual on occupational injury statistics from household surveys and establishment surveys. Chi‑squared tests and regression analyses were used. Results: Out of 381 invited workers, 321 participated in the study (response rate: 84). Of the respondents, 209 had experienced at least one injury that restricted them from work at least one day in the past year, giving an overall prevalence of occupational injuries of 65.1% per year. Out of the injured respondents, 135 (64.6%) reported being hospitalized or lying on the bed at home due to the injury. Working years, working hours per day, working 12‑hour shifts, and their section at the workplace (rolling mill or furnace) were factors significantly associated with occupational injuries in univariate regression analyses. Working hours of more than 10 hours per day, adjusted for all other factors, gave an odds ratio of 2.54 for experiencing injuries at work, with a 95% confidence interval (1.46-4.41), while no other factors showed significant association with injuries after adjustment. Conclusion: The prevalence of occupational injuries in the Tanzanian iron and steel industries was 65.1%. Working for more than 10 hours per day was a significant predictor of occupational injuries.
{"title":"Prevalence of occupational injuries among workers in the iron and steel industries in Tanzania.","authors":"Saumu Shabani, Bente Elisabeth Moen, Wakgari Deressa, Simon Henry Mamuya","doi":"10.5334/aogh.4503","DOIUrl":"10.5334/aogh.4503","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Background:</i> In Tanzania, iron and steel manufacturing industries are based on manual work with minor automation, as workers segregate scrap metals and add them to furnaces for melting. The workers here are exposed to hazardous conditions, posing a risk to their health. <i>Objective:</i> To determine the prevalence of occupational injuries and possible predictors for injuries among workers in the iron and steel industries in Tanzania. <i>Methods:</i> The cross‑sectional study was conducted in 2022 in Tanzania. Workers from the production lines in four iron and steel factories participated in the study. The data were collected by interviews, using a structured questionnaire modified from the International Labour Organization (ILO) manual on occupational injury statistics from household surveys and establishment surveys. Chi‑squared tests and regression analyses were used. <i>Results:</i> Out of 381 invited workers, 321 participated in the study (response rate: 84). Of the respondents, 209 had experienced at least one injury that restricted them from work at least one day in the past year, giving an overall prevalence of occupational injuries of 65.1% per year. Out of the injured respondents, 135 (64.6%) reported being hospitalized or lying on the bed at home due to the injury. Working years, working hours per day, working 12‑hour shifts, and their section at the workplace (rolling mill or furnace) were factors significantly associated with occupational injuries in univariate regression analyses. Working hours of more than 10 hours per day, adjusted for all other factors, gave an odds ratio of 2.54 for experiencing injuries at work, with a 95% confidence interval (1.46-4.41), while no other factors showed significant association with injuries after adjustment. <i>Conclusion:</i> The prevalence of occupational injuries in the Tanzanian iron and steel industries was 65.1%. Working for more than 10 hours per day was a significant predictor of occupational injuries.</p>","PeriodicalId":48857,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Global Health","volume":"91 1","pages":"9"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11804172/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143383906","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-29eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.5334/aogh.4570
Esther Oluwakemi Oluwole, Alero Ann Roberts, Ifeoma Peace Okafor, Victoria Oluwasola Yesufu
Background: The world still grapples with alarming maternal mortality rates, particularly in developing nations, including Nigeria. Annual global deaths exceed 500,000, predominantly in developing countries (99%) and sub‑Saharan Africa (over 50%), where the lifetime risk of maternal death is 1 in 26. Millions of women of reproductive age and their children could be saved from poor outcomes through the utilization of available effective affordable maternal healthcare services. Objective: This study assessed the patterns and predictors of maternal healthcare service utilization among women of reproductive age in Lagos state, Nigeria. Methods: A cross‑sectional study was conducted among 453 women of reproductive age selected through multistage sampling between July 2022 and March 2023. Data collection employed interviewer‑administered questionnaires, and analysis was performed using SPSS V.25 software. Statistical analysis included bivariate and multivariate analyses, with a significance level set at p < 0.05. Findings: Nearly all participants (99%) were familiar with antenatal care (ANC), while 63% knew about postnatal care services, and 82% understood modern family planning methods. Most respondents (86%) accessed ANC in healthcare facilities; however, the majority (70.7%) booked during the second trimester. The majority (97%) attended ANC more than four times, and 77% gave births in healthcare facilities. Notably, 86% attended postnatal care services primarily for child vaccination. Christian religion (adjusted odds ratio (AOR): 1.810; confidence interval (CI): 0.989-3.313), self‑employment status of spouses (AOR: 2.949: CI: 1.413-6.153), and household monthly income above 60,000.00 naira (AOR: 2.015; CI: 1.002-4.005) were predictors for ANC use. Similarly, Christian religion (AOR: 2.326; CI: 1.426-3.796), self‑employment status of spouses (AOR: 3.111; CI: 1.633-5.929), and having health insurance (AOR: 5.327; CI: 1.229-23.080) were predictors for use of healthcare facilities for childbirth. Conclusion: This study reveals high awareness and utilization of maternal health services but highlights room for improvement in early antenatal care registration and postnatal care beyond the child's immunization.
{"title":"Pattern and Predictors of Maternal Healthcare Services Utilization among Women of Reproductive Age in Lagos, Nigeria.","authors":"Esther Oluwakemi Oluwole, Alero Ann Roberts, Ifeoma Peace Okafor, Victoria Oluwasola Yesufu","doi":"10.5334/aogh.4570","DOIUrl":"10.5334/aogh.4570","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Background:</i> The world still grapples with alarming maternal mortality rates, particularly in developing nations, including Nigeria. Annual global deaths exceed 500,000, predominantly in developing countries (99%) and sub‑Saharan Africa (over 50%), where the lifetime risk of maternal death is 1 in 26. Millions of women of reproductive age and their children could be saved from poor outcomes through the utilization of available effective affordable maternal healthcare services. <i>Objective:</i> This study assessed the patterns and predictors of maternal healthcare service utilization among women of reproductive age in Lagos state, Nigeria. <i>Methods:</i> A cross‑sectional study was conducted among 453 women of reproductive age selected through multistage sampling between July 2022 and March 2023. Data collection employed interviewer‑administered questionnaires, and analysis was performed using SPSS V.25 software. Statistical analysis included bivariate and multivariate analyses, with a significance level set at <i>p</i> < 0.05. <i>Findings:</i> Nearly all participants (99%) were familiar with antenatal care (ANC), while 63% knew about postnatal care services, and 82% understood modern family planning methods. Most respondents (86%) accessed ANC in healthcare facilities; however, the majority (70.7%) booked during the second trimester. The majority (97%) attended ANC more than four times, and 77% gave births in healthcare facilities. Notably, 86% attended postnatal care services primarily for child vaccination. Christian religion (adjusted odds ratio (AOR): 1.810; confidence interval (CI): 0.989-3.313), self‑employment status of spouses (AOR: 2.949: CI: 1.413-6.153), and household monthly income above 60,000.00 naira (AOR: 2.015; CI: 1.002-4.005) were predictors for ANC use. Similarly, Christian religion (AOR: 2.326; CI: 1.426-3.796), self‑employment status of spouses (AOR: 3.111; CI: 1.633-5.929), and having health insurance (AOR: 5.327; CI: 1.229-23.080) were predictors for use of healthcare facilities for childbirth. <i>Conclusion:</i> This study reveals high awareness and utilization of maternal health services but highlights room for improvement in early antenatal care registration and postnatal care beyond the child's immunization.</p>","PeriodicalId":48857,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Global Health","volume":"91 1","pages":"7"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2025-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11784518/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143081649","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-29eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.5334/aogh.4544
Melissa Rallo, Nicholas Leahy, Alexis Vetack, Hima Konduru, Shania Bailey, Lillianna Pedersen, Christine Wan, Wendel Mora, Virginia Rowthorn, Shailvi Gupta, Carlos Faerron Guzmán
Introduction: Indigenous communities grapple with unique challenges in the aging process, often encountering amplified barriers to healthcare and resources, possibly due to their remote locations and distinct cultural backgrounds. Limited research exists on aging within Costa Rica's Ngäbe‑Buglé Indigenous community, particularly the La Casona community in Coto Brus. This study explores the aging experience of the Ngäbe‑Buglé community in La Casona, aiming to identify challenges and potential resources to enhance the quality of life and aging experience for elderly community members. Methods: This qualitative study utilized semi‑structured interviews to collect data from 14 elderly participants (6 female, 8 male), aged 52-90 years, living in the La Casona community. Participants were selected through purposeful snowball sampling techniques, and individual interviews were conducted at their residences. Interviews were conducted with assistance from an interpreter and lasted approximately 30-60 minutes. Thematic analysis was used to examine participants' responses to understand their experiences with aging. Results: Three primary themes emerged: economic difficulties, insufficient social support, and cultural aspects related to La Casona. Among the three primary themes were a total of eight subcategories. Economic challenges encompassed financial constraints and food insecurity, housing and infrastructure needs, and difficulties in accessing healthcare. Insufficient social support was evident through heavy reliance on family, limited community aid, and an absence of engaging activities. Cultural aspects highlighted the community's deep connection to nature and concerns about the fading cultural heritage among younger generations. These themes collectively contribute to the challenges confronted by elderly adults in the Ngäbe‑Buglé community. Conclusions: Improving healthcare access, enhancing social interactions, and preserving cultural heritage are essential when it comes to improving the aging experience in La Casona. The following participant discussions provide insight into public health interventions. Addressing these issues will require governmental support and policy changes aimed at uplifting the Ngäbe‑Buglé community.
{"title":"Experience of Aging in the Ngäbe‑Buglé Community in Coto Brus, Costa Rica: A Qualitative Study.","authors":"Melissa Rallo, Nicholas Leahy, Alexis Vetack, Hima Konduru, Shania Bailey, Lillianna Pedersen, Christine Wan, Wendel Mora, Virginia Rowthorn, Shailvi Gupta, Carlos Faerron Guzmán","doi":"10.5334/aogh.4544","DOIUrl":"10.5334/aogh.4544","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Introduction:</i> Indigenous communities grapple with unique challenges in the aging process, often encountering amplified barriers to healthcare and resources, possibly due to their remote locations and distinct cultural backgrounds. Limited research exists on aging within Costa Rica's Ngäbe‑Buglé Indigenous community, particularly the La Casona community in Coto Brus. This study explores the aging experience of the Ngäbe‑Buglé community in La Casona, aiming to identify challenges and potential resources to enhance the quality of life and aging experience for elderly community members. <i>Methods:</i> This qualitative study utilized semi‑structured interviews to collect data from 14 elderly participants (6 female, 8 male), aged 52-90 years, living in the La Casona community. Participants were selected through purposeful snowball sampling techniques, and individual interviews were conducted at their residences. Interviews were conducted with assistance from an interpreter and lasted approximately 30-60 minutes. Thematic analysis was used to examine participants' responses to understand their experiences with aging. <i>Results:</i> Three primary themes emerged: economic difficulties, insufficient social support, and cultural aspects related to La Casona. Among the three primary themes were a total of eight subcategories. Economic challenges encompassed financial constraints and food insecurity, housing and infrastructure needs, and difficulties in accessing healthcare. Insufficient social support was evident through heavy reliance on family, limited community aid, and an absence of engaging activities. Cultural aspects highlighted the community's deep connection to nature and concerns about the fading cultural heritage among younger generations. These themes collectively contribute to the challenges confronted by elderly adults in the Ngäbe‑Buglé community. <i>Conclusions:</i> Improving healthcare access, enhancing social interactions, and preserving cultural heritage are essential when it comes to improving the aging experience in La Casona. The following participant discussions provide insight into public health interventions. Addressing these issues will require governmental support and policy changes aimed at uplifting the Ngäbe‑Buglé community.</p>","PeriodicalId":48857,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Global Health","volume":"91 1","pages":"8"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2025-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11784519/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143081646","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-25eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.5334/aogh.4616
Melissa Salm, Ala Alwan, Maureen Lichtveld, Patricia J García, Peter H Kilmarx, Nelson K Sewankambo, Rebecca Martin, Tahmeed Ahmed, Judith N Wasserheit
In 2023, an interdisciplinary group of global health experts from five continents convened a plenary panel at the Consortium of Universities for Global Health (CUGH) annual conference entitled "Reimagining Global Health for the 21st Century." At the heart of this viewpoint article lies a fundamental question: How can we reimagine global health to best confront existing challenges and meet the demands of the future? To fully assess the scope of global health challenges and identify sustainable solutions, a clear definition of the aims and strategic approaches is needed. Such an assessment is also critical for progress in promoting equity, including decolonizing global health. Key issues examined are the following: equity, governance, research, education, and sustainability. To assure a sustainable global health enterprise, we propose the following three strategic imperatives as guiding principles: a holistic, unified approach grounded in mutual benefit, joint investment, long‑term collaborative commitment, and solidarity across low‑ to middle‑income countries (LMICs) and high‑income countries (HICs); joint priority setting of investments in research, education, practice, and workforce development; and collaborative governance, maximizing a multisectoral approach among local, national, regional, and global strategies. The viewpoint sets the stage for the development of an action roadmap to develop a unified concept of global health; identify strategies to ensure sustained funding for global health research, education and training, and practice; establish benchmarks and metrics to measure progress; and design a collaborative governance system to promote interconnectedness and engagement among local, regional, national, and global stakeholders.
{"title":"Reimagining Global Health: Accelerating Change for a Sustainable Future.","authors":"Melissa Salm, Ala Alwan, Maureen Lichtveld, Patricia J García, Peter H Kilmarx, Nelson K Sewankambo, Rebecca Martin, Tahmeed Ahmed, Judith N Wasserheit","doi":"10.5334/aogh.4616","DOIUrl":"10.5334/aogh.4616","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In 2023, an interdisciplinary group of global health experts from five continents convened a plenary panel at the Consortium of Universities for Global Health (CUGH) annual conference entitled \"Reimagining Global Health for the 21st Century.\" At the heart of this viewpoint article lies a fundamental question: How can we reimagine global health to best confront existing challenges and meet the demands of the future? To fully assess the scope of global health challenges and identify sustainable solutions, a clear definition of the aims and strategic approaches is needed. Such an assessment is also critical for progress in promoting equity, including decolonizing global health. Key issues examined are the following: equity, governance, research, education, and sustainability. To assure a sustainable global health enterprise, we propose the following three strategic imperatives as guiding principles: a holistic, unified approach grounded in mutual benefit, joint investment, long‑term collaborative commitment, and solidarity across low‑ to middle‑income countries (LMICs) and high‑income countries (HICs); joint priority setting of investments in research, education, practice, and workforce development; and collaborative governance, maximizing a multisectoral approach among local, national, regional, and global strategies. The viewpoint sets the stage for the development of an action roadmap to develop a unified concept of global health; identify strategies to ensure sustained funding for global health research, education and training, and practice; establish benchmarks and metrics to measure progress; and design a collaborative governance system to promote interconnectedness and engagement among local, regional, national, and global stakeholders.</p>","PeriodicalId":48857,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Global Health","volume":"91 1","pages":"6"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2025-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11784496/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143081704","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-24eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.5334/aogh.4589
Alpha Johnson Kapola, Rahma Musoke, Glenda Marie Manayon, Hassan Fredrick Fussi, Hafidha Mhando Bakari, Haji Mbwana Ally, Swalehe Mustafa Salim, Zuhura Mbwana Ally, Lynn Moshi, Mariam Salim Mbwana, Habib Omari Ramadhani
Background: Pre‑exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is an effective measure for preventing human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection among people at risk, including adolescents and young adults (AYA). Objectives: This study evaluates the prevalence of PrEP awareness and endorsement, as well as the factors associated with these outcomes, using data from the 2022 Tanzania Demographic and Health Survey. Methods: The analysis included participants aged 15-24 years. Participants were asked whether they had ever heard of daily medication to prevent HIV (PrEP) and whether they approved of daily PrEP use. Demographic characteristics and HIV testing information were also collected. Logistic regression models were used to assess factors associated with PrEP awareness and endorsement, and the weighted prevalence of these outcomes was calculated. Findings: A total of 8,268 respondents aged 15-24 years were evaluated, of whom 5,852 (70.9%) were female. Overall, the prevalence of PrEP awareness and endorsement was 6.9% (95% confidence interval [CI] 6.2-7.7) and 5.7% (95% CI 5.1-6.4), respectively. Female respondents (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 0.69; 95% CI 0.51-0.91) and rural residents (aOR = 0.78; 95% CI 0.61-1.00) had lower odds of PrEP awareness compared with male respondents and urban residents, respectively. Previously, HIV testing and receiving test results (aOR = 2.00; 95% CI 1.50-2.66) and an age of 20-24 years versus 15-19 years (aOR = 1.54; 95% CI 1.20-1.96) were associated with increased odds of PrEP awareness. The odds of AYA endorsement of PrEP were higher among those aged 20-24 years versus 15-19 years (aOR = 1.39; 95% CI 1.07-1.83) and those who previously tested for HIV and received results (aOR = 1.97; 95% CI 1.43-2.72), but lower among female respondents (aOR = 0.66; 95% CI 0.49-0.88). Conclusion: PrEP awareness and endorsement among AYA in Tanzania were low, with nearly 7 in 100 aware of PrEP and 6 in 100 approving of its use. Targeted interventions focused on adolescents, females, and rural communities are needed to increase PrEP awareness and usage to achieve the Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS) (UNAIDS) 95-95-95 goals for HIV epidemic control.
背景:暴露前预防(PrEP)是预防高危人群(包括青少年和年轻人)感染人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)的有效措施。目的:本研究利用2022年坦桑尼亚人口与健康调查的数据,评估了PrEP意识和认可的流行程度,以及与这些结果相关的因素。方法:纳入15-24岁的参与者。参与者被问及他们是否听说过预防艾滋病毒的每日药物(PrEP),以及他们是否批准每日使用PrEP。还收集了人口统计学特征和艾滋病毒检测信息。采用Logistic回归模型评估与PrEP认知和认可相关的因素,并计算这些结果的加权患病率。结果:共评估了8268名15-24岁的受访者,其中5852名(70.9%)为女性。总体而言,PrEP的知晓率和认可率分别为6.9%(95%置信区间[CI] 6.2-7.7)和5.7% (95% CI 5.1-6.4)。女性受访者(调整后优势比[aOR] = 0.69;95% CI 0.51-0.91)和农村居民(aOR = 0.78;(95% CI 0.61-1.00)的女性知晓PrEP的几率分别低于男性受访者和城市居民。以前,艾滋病毒检测和接受检测结果(aOR = 2.00;95% CI 1.50-2.66),年龄为20-24岁vs 15-19岁(aOR = 1.54;95% CI 1.20-1.96)与PrEP意识的增加相关。20-24岁的AYA认可PrEP的几率高于15-19岁(aOR = 1.39;95% CI 1.07-1.83)和以前进行过艾滋病毒检测并获得结果的人(aOR = 1.97;95% CI 1.43-2.72),但在女性受访者中较低(aOR = 0.66;95% ci 0.49-0.88)。结论:坦桑尼亚AYA的PrEP意识和认可度较低,近7 / 100的人知道PrEP, 6 / 100的人批准使用PrEP。需要以青少年、女性和农村社区为重点的有针对性的干预措施,以提高预防措施的认识和使用,以实现联合国艾滋病毒/获得性免疫缺陷综合症(艾滋病)联合规划署(艾滋病规划署)95-95-95控制艾滋病毒流行病的目标。
{"title":"Pre‑exposure Prophylaxis Awareness and Endorsement among Adolescents and Young Adults in Tanzania: Insights from the 2022 Demographic and Health Survey.","authors":"Alpha Johnson Kapola, Rahma Musoke, Glenda Marie Manayon, Hassan Fredrick Fussi, Hafidha Mhando Bakari, Haji Mbwana Ally, Swalehe Mustafa Salim, Zuhura Mbwana Ally, Lynn Moshi, Mariam Salim Mbwana, Habib Omari Ramadhani","doi":"10.5334/aogh.4589","DOIUrl":"10.5334/aogh.4589","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Background:</i> Pre‑exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is an effective measure for preventing human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection among people at risk, including adolescents and young adults (AYA). <i>Objectives:</i> This study evaluates the prevalence of PrEP awareness and endorsement, as well as the factors associated with these outcomes, using data from the 2022 Tanzania Demographic and Health Survey. <i>Methods:</i> The analysis included participants aged 15-24 years. Participants were asked whether they had ever heard of daily medication to prevent HIV (PrEP) and whether they approved of daily PrEP use. Demographic characteristics and HIV testing information were also collected. Logistic regression models were used to assess factors associated with PrEP awareness and endorsement, and the weighted prevalence of these outcomes was calculated. <i>Findings:</i> A total of 8,268 respondents aged 15-24 years were evaluated, of whom 5,852 (70.9%) were female. Overall, the prevalence of PrEP awareness and endorsement was 6.9% (95% confidence interval [CI] 6.2-7.7) and 5.7% (95% CI 5.1-6.4), respectively. Female respondents (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 0.69; 95% CI 0.51-0.91) and rural residents (aOR = 0.78; 95% CI 0.61-1.00) had lower odds of PrEP awareness compared with male respondents and urban residents, respectively. Previously, HIV testing and receiving test results (aOR = 2.00; 95% CI 1.50-2.66) and an age of 20-24 years versus 15-19 years (aOR = 1.54; 95% CI 1.20-1.96) were associated with increased odds of PrEP awareness. The odds of AYA endorsement of PrEP were higher among those aged 20-24 years versus 15-19 years (aOR = 1.39; 95% CI 1.07-1.83) and those who previously tested for HIV and received results (aOR = 1.97; 95% CI 1.43-2.72), but lower among female respondents (aOR = 0.66; 95% CI 0.49-0.88). <i>Conclusion:</i> PrEP awareness and endorsement among AYA in Tanzania were low, with nearly 7 in 100 aware of PrEP and 6 in 100 approving of its use. Targeted interventions focused on adolescents, females, and rural communities are needed to increase PrEP awareness and usage to achieve the Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS) (UNAIDS) 95-95-95 goals for HIV epidemic control.</p>","PeriodicalId":48857,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Global Health","volume":"91 1","pages":"4"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2025-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11784521/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143081698","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}