Background: Global health security is increasingly threatened by Chemical, Biological, Radiological, Nuclear, and Explosive (CBRNe) incidents. Frontline nurses, as first responders, are critically exposed, yet evidence on their readiness in high-risk regions remains scarce.
Aim: This study aimed to conduct the first dual-level, system-wide evaluation of CBRNe preparedness in Jordan. It specifically sought to benchmark the practical competency of the nursing workforce and hospital-level readiness.
Methods: A mixed-methods cross-sectional study was performed across five major hospitals, involving 298 frontline providers (predominantly nurses, 69.5%, n = 207) and 30 senior administrators. The study utilized a validated provider skills assessment and the Canadian Centre for Emergency Preparedness (CEEP) survey. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and the Kruskal-Wallis H-test.
Results: A critical gap between policy and practice was identified, revealing a acute vulnerability among nurses. While all providers were competent in basic (Level D) personal protective equipment (PPE), proficiency plummeted to 14.8% for Level B and 1.7% for Level A. Furthermore, 76.8% of providers had never participated in a CBRNe simulation, and only 20.5% felt capable of performing casualty decontamination, a core nursing responsibility. Hospital-level preparedness varied drastically (p < 0.001), revealing a pronounced military-civilian divide. The top-performing hospital scored 67.7% in biological preparedness, while the lowest scored 16.7% in chemical preparedness.
Conclusions: This study uncovers a systemic failure in translating CBRNe policy into frontline practice, creating a dangerous vulnerability that disproportionately impacts nurses as first responders. The findings mandate an urgent paradigm shift from fragmented, facility-specific efforts to a standardized, nationally-integrated CBRNe readiness strategy that prioritizes and empowers the nursing workforce.
扫码关注我们
求助内容:
应助结果提醒方式:
