Abstract. This article aims to explain how Ptolemy could have constructed a map of the Pontus Euxinus (Black Sea), as described in his Geography, under the assumption that his sources were similar to those that have come down to us. The method employed is based on the comparison of Ptolemy's data with corresponding information from other ancient sources, revealing the most conspicuous similarities and differences between them. Three types of information are considered as possible “constituent elements” of Ptolemy's map: latitudes, coastline lengths, and straight-line distances. It is argued that the latitudes Ptolemy used for the key points determining the overall shape of the Pontus (Byzantium, Trapezus, the mouth of the Borysthenes and the Cimmerian Bosporus, the mouth of the Tanais, etc.) were most likely inherited from earlier geographers (Eratosthenes, Hipparchus, and Marinus). In exactly the same way, Ptolemy's data on the circumference of the Pontus and the length of the coastal stretches between the key points (from the Thracian Bosporus to Cape Karambis, Sinope, Trapezus, and the mouth of the Phasis, etc.) closely correlate with the corresponding estimates reported by other geographers (Eratosthenes, Artemidorus, Strabo, Pliny, Arrian, and Pseudo-Arrian), which implies that Ptolemy drew on similar coastline length information. The shortening of Ptolemy's west coast of the Pontus (from the Thracian Bosporus to the mouth of the Borysthenes) relative to the corresponding distances reported by other sources is explained by his underestimation of the circumference of the Earth. The lengthening of Ptolemy's north-east Pontus coast (from the Cimmerian Bosporus to the mouth of the Phasis) can, in part, be accounted for by his attempt to incorporate the straight-line distances across the open sea reported by Pliny. Overall, Ptolemy's configuration of the Black Sea can be satisfactorily explained as a result of fitting contradictory pieces of information together that were inherited from earlier geographical traditions.
{"title":"The configuration of the Pontus Euxinus in Ptolemy's Geography","authors":"Dmitry A. Shcheglov","doi":"10.5194/hgss-11-31-2020","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5194/hgss-11-31-2020","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. This article aims to explain how Ptolemy could have constructed a\u0000map of the Pontus Euxinus (Black Sea), as described in his Geography, under the\u0000assumption that his sources were similar to those that have come down to us.\u0000The method employed is based on the comparison of Ptolemy's data with\u0000corresponding information from other ancient sources, revealing the most\u0000conspicuous similarities and differences between them. Three types of\u0000information are considered as possible “constituent elements” of Ptolemy's\u0000map: latitudes, coastline lengths, and straight-line distances. It is argued\u0000that the latitudes Ptolemy used for the key points determining the overall shape of\u0000the Pontus (Byzantium, Trapezus, the mouth of the Borysthenes and the\u0000Cimmerian Bosporus, the mouth of the Tanais, etc.) were most likely\u0000inherited from earlier geographers (Eratosthenes, Hipparchus, and Marinus).\u0000In exactly the same way, Ptolemy's data on the circumference of the Pontus\u0000and the length of the coastal stretches between the key points (from the\u0000Thracian Bosporus to Cape Karambis, Sinope, Trapezus, and the mouth of the\u0000Phasis, etc.) closely correlate with the corresponding estimates reported by\u0000other geographers (Eratosthenes, Artemidorus, Strabo, Pliny, Arrian, and\u0000Pseudo-Arrian), which implies that Ptolemy drew on similar coastline length\u0000information. The shortening of Ptolemy's west coast of the Pontus (from the\u0000Thracian Bosporus to the mouth of the Borysthenes) relative to the\u0000corresponding distances reported by other sources is explained by his\u0000underestimation of the circumference of the Earth. The lengthening of\u0000Ptolemy's north-east Pontus coast (from the Cimmerian Bosporus to the mouth\u0000of the Phasis) can, in part, be accounted for by his attempt to incorporate\u0000the straight-line distances across the open sea reported by Pliny. Overall,\u0000Ptolemy's configuration of the Black Sea can be satisfactorily explained as\u0000a result of fitting contradictory pieces of information together that were inherited\u0000from earlier geographical traditions.","PeriodicalId":48918,"journal":{"name":"History of Geo- and Space Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2020-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43733834","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Abstract. The 100th anniversary of the Liverpool Tidal Institute (LTI) was celebrated during 2019. One aspect of tidal science for which the LTI acquired a worldwide reputation was the development and use of tide prediction machines (TPMs). The TPM was invented in the late 19th century, but most of them were made in the first half of the 20th century, up until the time that the advent of digital computers consigned them to museums. This paper describes the basic principles of a TPM, reviews how many were constructed around the world and discusses the method devised by Arthur Doodson at the LTI for the determination of harmonic tidal constants from tide gauge data. These constants were required in order to set up the TPMs for predicting the heights and times of the tides. Although only 3 of the 30-odd TPMs constructed were employed in operational tidal prediction at the LTI, Doodson was responsible for the design and oversight of the manufacture of several others. The paper demonstrates how the UK, and the LTI and Doodson in particular, played a central role in this area of tidal science.
{"title":"Tide prediction machines at the Liverpool Tidal Institute","authors":"P. Woodworth","doi":"10.5194/hgss-11-15-2020","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5194/hgss-11-15-2020","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. The 100th anniversary of the Liverpool Tidal Institute (LTI) was\u0000celebrated during 2019. One aspect of tidal science for which the LTI\u0000acquired a worldwide reputation was the development and use of tide\u0000prediction machines (TPMs). The TPM was invented in the late 19th\u0000century, but most of them were made in the first half of the 20th\u0000century, up until the time that the advent of digital computers consigned\u0000them to museums. This paper describes the basic principles of a TPM, reviews\u0000how many were constructed around the world and discusses the method devised\u0000by Arthur Doodson at the LTI for the determination of harmonic tidal\u0000constants from tide gauge data. These constants were required in order to\u0000set up the TPMs for predicting the heights and times of the tides. Although\u0000only 3 of the 30-odd TPMs constructed were employed in operational tidal\u0000prediction at the LTI, Doodson was responsible for the design and oversight\u0000of the manufacture of several others. The paper demonstrates how the UK, and\u0000the LTI and Doodson in particular, played a central role in this area of\u0000tidal science.\u0000","PeriodicalId":48918,"journal":{"name":"History of Geo- and Space Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2020-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47338150","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Abstract. The physician Leonardo Vordoni recorded sea heights at Trieste from 1782 to 1794 because of his interest in studying the connections between tides and the course of diseases that he attributed to the same forces. The data, expressed in Paris feet and inches (1 ft = 12 in. = 32.4845 cm), consist of heights measured on a pole, relative to the green algae belt corresponding to the mean high water. The measurements were reported in a manuscript that was recently found in the correspondence received by Giuseppe Toaldo, an astronomer in Padua. The observations were made twice a day until June 1791 and more frequently afterwards; the data from July 1791 onwards reasonably describe both the astronomical tide and the inverted-barometer (IB) effect. The low frequency of observations and poor metadata information seriously limit the scientific value of the data set, which, therefore, has mainly a historical value. In comparisons with modern data, the amplitude of sea level variations appears rather large, as if a unit shorter than the Paris foot was used. Moreover, an anomalously large decadal trend exists, which might be due to the pole sinking into the sea floor. The sea heights were digitized and are available through SEANOE (SEA scieNtific Open data Edition; https://doi.org/10.17882/62598 ; Raicich, 2019a).
{"title":"A 1782–1794 sea level record at Trieste (northern Adriatic)","authors":"F. Raicich","doi":"10.5194/hgss-11-1-2020","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5194/hgss-11-1-2020","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. The physician Leonardo Vordoni recorded sea heights at\u0000Trieste from 1782 to 1794 because of his interest in studying the\u0000connections between tides and the course of diseases that he attributed to\u0000the same forces. The data, expressed in Paris feet and inches (1 ft = 12 in. = 32.4845 cm), consist of\u0000heights measured on a pole, relative to the green algae belt corresponding\u0000to the mean high water. The measurements were reported in a manuscript that\u0000was recently found in the correspondence received by Giuseppe Toaldo, an\u0000astronomer in Padua. The observations were made twice a day until June 1791\u0000and more frequently afterwards; the data from July 1791 onwards reasonably describe both the astronomical tide and the inverted-barometer (IB) effect. The\u0000low frequency of observations and poor metadata information seriously limit\u0000the scientific value of the data set, which, therefore, has mainly a\u0000historical value. In comparisons with modern data, the amplitude of sea\u0000level variations appears rather large, as if a unit shorter than the Paris\u0000foot was used. Moreover, an anomalously large decadal trend exists, which\u0000might be due to the pole sinking into the sea floor. The sea heights were\u0000digitized and are available through SEANOE (SEA scieNtific Open data Edition; https://doi.org/10.17882/62598 ;\u0000Raicich, 2019a).","PeriodicalId":48918,"journal":{"name":"History of Geo- and Space Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2020-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141223964","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2019-10-25DOI: 10.5194/hgss-10-269-2019
Rūta Puzienė
Abstract. The determination of parameters of the Earth's ellipsoid is quite a difficult task that gives no rest to scientists to this day. One of the more famous works is the Struve Geodetic Arc, which was stretched from the Black Sea to the Arctic Ocean by employing the method of a triangulation network and which is included in the UNESCO World Heritage Site list. However, until this project was implemented, many steps of scientific and technological advancement had to be taken, the entirety of which created the conditions for the realization of this project. A study of the method of triangulation measurements, the development of geodetic devices, the state politics of the Russian Empire in the 17th–19th centuries in the field of geodesy, and the development of triangulation during this period are presented in the article. Moreover, a study of the origins of the Struve Geodetic Arc project that led to such a grand result is conducted. The obtained results reveal that certain factors predetermined the favourable conditions for the successful execution of the project of this geodetic arc.
{"title":"The Struve Geodetic Arc: the development of the triangulation, technical possibilities, and the initiation of the project","authors":"Rūta Puzienė","doi":"10.5194/hgss-10-269-2019","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5194/hgss-10-269-2019","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. The determination of parameters of the Earth's ellipsoid\u0000is quite a difficult task that gives no rest to scientists to this\u0000day. One of the more famous works is the Struve Geodetic Arc, which was stretched from\u0000the Black Sea to the Arctic Ocean by employing the method of a triangulation\u0000network and which is included in the UNESCO World Heritage Site list. However, until\u0000this project was implemented, many steps of scientific and technological\u0000advancement had to be taken, the entirety of which created the conditions\u0000for the realization of this project. A study of the method of triangulation\u0000measurements, the development of geodetic devices, the state\u0000politics of the Russian Empire in the 17th–19th centuries in the field of\u0000geodesy, and the development of triangulation during this period are\u0000presented in the article. Moreover, a study of the origins of the Struve\u0000Geodetic Arc project that led to such a grand result is conducted. The\u0000obtained results reveal that certain factors predetermined\u0000the favourable conditions for the successful execution of the project of\u0000this geodetic arc.\u0000","PeriodicalId":48918,"journal":{"name":"History of Geo- and Space Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2019-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47321039","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}