Introduction and objectives: The Ross procedure is the preferred surgical treatment for pediatric aortic valve diseases, and its long-term outcomes have been extensively documented. This article presents the results of the Ross and Ross-Konno procedures performed on pediatric patients in our center.
Methods: Ross and Ross-Konno procedures were performed on 20 patients in our center between January 2015 and January 2019.
Results: The patients' mean age was 10.6 years (range: 23 days to 18 years) and mean weight was 37.6 kg (range: 3-63 kg). Thirteen had aortic valve stenosis, four had aortic valve insufficiency, and three had a mixed disease. The Ross-Konno procedure was used for four patients. The mean cardiopulmonary bypass time was 184.68±60.1 min and the mean cross time was 149±67.8 min. One neonatal patient died in the early postoperative phase due to low cardiac output. The mean follow-up time was 60.15±24.45 months. One patient later underwent reoperation due to conduit stenosis. One patient is being monitored for moderately serious conduit stenosis. At present, of those who underwent the procedure, one has moderate aortic regurgitation, two have mild or moderate aortic regurgitation, and others have minimal aortic regurgitation. No patients required intervention for left ventricular outflow tract obstruction and mortality was not observed in the long term.
Conclusion(s): The reintervention rates for autograft and conduit-related cases were low in early and medium-term follow-up, and no significant autograft insufficiency was observed. Ross or Ross-Konno surgery is preferred for aortic diseases in pediatric patients due to its low mortality and satisfactory long-term results.
Introduction and objective: Congenital heart disease (CHD) is a complex condition requiring a multidisciplinary approach. It is crucial that adults with CHD (CHD) have adequate knowledge of their condition, enabling them to engage in their healthcare decisions and self-management. We aimed to investigate knowledge and perception among adults of their CHD.
Methods: Single-center, observational, cross-sectional study. A 25-item adapted survey of Leuven Questionnaire for CHD was used to assess four main domains: (1) disease and treatment, (2) endocarditis and preventive measures, (3) physical activity and (4) reproductive issues.
Results: One hundred forty-eight patients participated in the study. Patients had a significant lack of knowledge localizing their heart defect, recognizing drug side effects, acting in case of experiencing drug side effects, recognizing at least two symptoms of clinical deterioration, to adequately define endocarditis and most typical signs and risk factors, to acknowledge the hereditary nature of their CHD and risk of clinical deterioration during pregnancies. Patients with an education level ≥12th grade have higher knowledge in various items and, overall, the complexity of CHD was not associated with a better performance.
Conclusion: This study highlights the existing knowledge gaps among adults with CHD. It underscores the need for tailored information and structured educational programs to improve management. By addressing these challenges, healthcare providers can enhance patient outcomes, improve quality of life, and promote long-term well-being for individuals with CHD.
Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is a central component in the management of cardiovascular disease. While its potential benefits have been extensively explored and confirmed, its implementation is still suboptimal, due to various possible barriers. This study aimed to assess training and attitudes concerning CR among physicians in a Portuguese setting.
An online questionnaire structured in three parts (participant characteristics, training and attitudes concerning CR, and a brief general knowledge assessment) was developed and sent to members of the Portuguese Society of Cardiology. The study population encompassed physicians with a medical specialty or residents from the third year onward of a specialty program.
A total of 97 individuals (57.7% male, 61.9% aged ≤50 years) presented valid answers. CR was available at the workplace of 54.6% of participants. Most of them considered that the time allocated to CR training during residency was inadequate, and thought that more time was needed for this purpose. Most had not dedicated (or intended to dedicate) time for CR training, with lack of time being the most frequently attributed reason. In terms of referral, a substantial proportion of subjects did not refer patients, with lack of CR centers and human resources being the most frequent reasons.
This survey provides contemporary data on CR training and attitudes, highlighting areas of potential improvement, such as time allocated to training in this area. These results could provide a useful pragmatic framework for optimization of training and awareness in this pivotal field of cardiovascular medicine.