Pub Date : 2025-01-01Epub Date: 2025-11-11DOI: 10.1177/10732748251397062
Luke Bromley, Christopher Harris, Luke Ardolino, Guy Eslick, Sanjay Warrier, Adam Ofri
IntroductionChemotherapy is used frequently in the neoadjuvant setting for breast cancers, most commonly triple negative and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2) positive breast cancer. Certain hormone positive HER-2 negative cancers known as luminal B have shown response to adjuvant chemotherapy and can be considered in the neoadjuvant setting. This meta-analysis reviews survival outcomes in neoadjuvant chemotherapy in comparison to adjuvant in luminal B breast cancer.MethodsPubMed, Medline, and Embase were accessed on the 31st of January 2024 to complete this systematic review and meta-analysis. All study types were included. Studies included compared survival rates in luminal B breast cancer patients in the neoadjuvant and adjuvant setting. All regimens of chemotherapy were included. Studies were included if they had at least median of 48 months follow up. Studies were excluded if they were non-comparative or did not report survival rates.ResultsTwo retrospective analyses comparing neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy were found from this systematic review, with a total of 4575 patients included. Of the 4575 patients, 679 received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (14.84%). Meta-analysis of these studies identified a non-significant trend of increased overall survival in the adjuvant chemotherapy arm with a hazard ratio of 1.85, confidence interval 0.98 - 3.48, (P value 0.058).DiscussionThis meta-analysis revealed a paucity of data in the comparison of neoadjuvant to adjuvant chemotherapy in luminal B breast cancer patients. Both studies identified were of a retrospective nature, and further research in this field should be considered.
{"title":"Neoadjuvant vs. Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Luminal B Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis - Where is the Evidence?","authors":"Luke Bromley, Christopher Harris, Luke Ardolino, Guy Eslick, Sanjay Warrier, Adam Ofri","doi":"10.1177/10732748251397062","DOIUrl":"10.1177/10732748251397062","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>IntroductionChemotherapy is used frequently in the neoadjuvant setting for breast cancers, most commonly triple negative and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2) positive breast cancer. Certain hormone positive HER-2 negative cancers known as luminal B have shown response to adjuvant chemotherapy and can be considered in the neoadjuvant setting. This meta-analysis reviews survival outcomes in neoadjuvant chemotherapy in comparison to adjuvant in luminal B breast cancer.MethodsPubMed, Medline, and Embase were accessed on the 31<sup>st</sup> of January 2024 to complete this systematic review and meta-analysis. All study types were included. Studies included compared survival rates in luminal B breast cancer patients in the neoadjuvant and adjuvant setting. All regimens of chemotherapy were included. Studies were included if they had at least median of 48 months follow up. Studies were excluded if they were non-comparative or did not report survival rates.ResultsTwo retrospective analyses comparing neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy were found from this systematic review, with a total of 4575 patients included. Of the 4575 patients, 679 received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (14.84%). Meta-analysis of these studies identified a non-significant trend of increased overall survival in the adjuvant chemotherapy arm with a hazard ratio of 1.85, confidence interval 0.98 - 3.48, (<i>P</i> value 0.058).DiscussionThis meta-analysis revealed a paucity of data in the comparison of neoadjuvant to adjuvant chemotherapy in luminal B breast cancer patients. Both studies identified were of a retrospective nature, and further research in this field should be considered.</p>","PeriodicalId":49093,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Control","volume":"32 ","pages":"10732748251397062"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12605877/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145496807","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01Epub Date: 2025-11-13DOI: 10.1177/10732748251394761
Anupam Rishi, Sonia Adamson, George Q Yang
IntroductionCancer patients often face challenges retaining critical information related to their diagnosis and treatment plans, with studies reporting retention rates as low as 11%-25%. This knowledge gap can negatively impact treatment adherence and increase patient anxiety. Visual communication tools may enhance patient comprehension and engagement in cancer care. To evaluate the effectiveness of MyCaregorithm, a novel digital tool, in improving patient comprehension of cancer treatment plans in a radiation oncology clinic setting.MethodsAdult patients with head and neck, prostate, or pancreatic cancers were recruited during routine clinic visits. Radiation oncologists or advanced practice providers utilized MyCaregorithm to explain the diagnosis, treatment plans, potential side effects, and follow-up care. Patients completed a survey assessing their experience with the tool. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the data.ResultsThe study included patients with head and neck (69%), prostate (17%), and pancreatic (14%) cancers. Key findings include: 94% of patients reported improved understanding of treatment options 94% found visual images enhanced comprehension of their medical situation 85% experienced greater benefit compared to previous consultations without the tool 97% would recommend the tool to other patients.ConclusionThe digital technology tool demonstrated high effectiveness in improving patient comprehension and engagement across multiple cancer types. The consistently positive response rates highlights its potential to enhance patient-provider communication in oncology settings. Further studies with larger cohorts are needed to validate these promising results.
{"title":"Impacts of a Novel Digital Education Module for Oncology Patients: A Prospective Experience.","authors":"Anupam Rishi, Sonia Adamson, George Q Yang","doi":"10.1177/10732748251394761","DOIUrl":"10.1177/10732748251394761","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>IntroductionCancer patients often face challenges retaining critical information related to their diagnosis and treatment plans, with studies reporting retention rates as low as 11%-25%. This knowledge gap can negatively impact treatment adherence and increase patient anxiety. Visual communication tools may enhance patient comprehension and engagement in cancer care. To evaluate the effectiveness of MyCaregorithm, a novel digital tool, in improving patient comprehension of cancer treatment plans in a radiation oncology clinic setting.MethodsAdult patients with head and neck, prostate, or pancreatic cancers were recruited during routine clinic visits. Radiation oncologists or advanced practice providers utilized MyCaregorithm to explain the diagnosis, treatment plans, potential side effects, and follow-up care. Patients completed a survey assessing their experience with the tool. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the data.ResultsThe study included patients with head and neck (69%), prostate (17%), and pancreatic (14%) cancers. Key findings include: 94% of patients reported improved understanding of treatment options 94% found visual images enhanced comprehension of their medical situation 85% experienced greater benefit compared to previous consultations without the tool 97% would recommend the tool to other patients.ConclusionThe digital technology tool demonstrated high effectiveness in improving patient comprehension and engagement across multiple cancer types. The consistently positive response rates highlights its potential to enhance patient-provider communication in oncology settings. Further studies with larger cohorts are needed to validate these promising results.</p>","PeriodicalId":49093,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Control","volume":"32 ","pages":"10732748251394761"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12618810/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145514723","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01Epub Date: 2025-06-16DOI: 10.1177/10732748251348537
Jackie Knight Wilt, Maria D Thomson
IntroductionColorectal cancer (CRC) has a lengthy cellular mutation period and early onset (EOCRC) is linked to lifestyle-related factors. Primary prevention approaches earlier in the life course are needed. Emerging adulthood (age 18-25) is a critical stage for shaping health trajectories, and future orientation influences health behavior decisions. Little is known about emerging adults' consideration of future cancer risk (CFC-Cancer), or perceived CRC risk. This study characterizes emerging adult CFC-Cancer, perceived CRC risk, and how they relate to EOCRC lifestyle related factors and cancer prevention behaviors.MethodsWe conducted a cross-sectional survey of college students at a public university. Measures included demographics, stress, family cancer history, and CRC knowledge. Previously validated measures for diet, sedentariness, smoking, alcohol consumption, and stress management assessed adherence with lifestyle prevention guidelines. HPV vaccination and skin checks appraised cancer prevention. Outcomes included perceived CRC risk (0%-100%) and CFC-Cancer adapted scale. Adjusted linear regression models examined CFC-Cancer and perceived CRC risk predictability.ResultsThe sample (N = 282) mean age was 20 years, 77% were female, 40% were White, and 67% had family cancer history. CRC knowledge μ = 14, and current stress was moderate. 18% completed both cancer prevention behaviors, and protective lifestyle behavior scores ranged between 2-15, μ = 8. Perceived CRC risk = 28%, and CFC-Cancer was moderate (μ = 61). CFC-Cancer model included significant predictors of GPA, CRC knowledge, and lifestyle health behavior score, while Perceived CRC Risk model included age and being employed.ConclusionEmerging adults overestimate CRC risk but also have moderate CFC-Cancer. Accurate CRC knowledge provided to this age group may help redirect CRC health trajectories through integration of EOCRC protective lifestyle health behaviors and sustaining them into adulthood.
{"title":"Emerging Adults' Consideration of their Future General and Colorectal-Specific Cancer Risk.","authors":"Jackie Knight Wilt, Maria D Thomson","doi":"10.1177/10732748251348537","DOIUrl":"10.1177/10732748251348537","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>IntroductionColorectal cancer (CRC) has a lengthy cellular mutation period and early onset (EOCRC) is linked to lifestyle-related factors. Primary prevention approaches earlier in the life course are needed. Emerging adulthood (age 18-25) is a critical stage for shaping health trajectories, and future orientation influences health behavior decisions. Little is known about emerging adults' consideration of future cancer risk (CFC-Cancer), or perceived CRC risk. This study characterizes emerging adult CFC-Cancer, perceived CRC risk, and how they relate to EOCRC lifestyle related factors and cancer prevention behaviors.MethodsWe conducted a cross-sectional survey of college students at a public university. Measures included demographics, stress, family cancer history, and CRC knowledge. Previously validated measures for diet, sedentariness, smoking, alcohol consumption, and stress management assessed adherence with lifestyle prevention guidelines. HPV vaccination and skin checks appraised cancer prevention. Outcomes included perceived CRC risk (0%-100%) and CFC-Cancer adapted scale. Adjusted linear regression models examined CFC-Cancer and perceived CRC risk predictability.ResultsThe sample (N = 282) mean age was 20 years, 77% were female, 40% were White, and 67% had family cancer history. CRC knowledge μ = 14, and current stress was moderate. 18% completed both cancer prevention behaviors, and protective lifestyle behavior scores ranged between 2-15, μ = 8. Perceived CRC risk = 28%, and CFC-Cancer was moderate (μ = 61). CFC-Cancer model included significant predictors of GPA, CRC knowledge, and lifestyle health behavior score, while Perceived CRC Risk model included age and being employed.ConclusionEmerging adults overestimate CRC risk but also have moderate CFC-Cancer. Accurate CRC knowledge provided to this age group may help redirect CRC health trajectories through integration of EOCRC protective lifestyle health behaviors and sustaining them into adulthood.</p>","PeriodicalId":49093,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Control","volume":"32 ","pages":"10732748251348537"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12174806/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144303411","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01Epub Date: 2025-06-16DOI: 10.1177/10732748251351754
Jie Lin, Hao Zheng, Yuan Dong, Lanqi Fu, Yujie Ding, Shucheng Huang, Shiwei Wang, Junna Wang
Introduction: Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide, with limited therapeutic outcomes and poor prognosis. Accurate diagnosis and optimal surgical decision-making remain critical challenges. This study aimed to develop and validate a clinical-radiomics nomogram integrating computed tomography (CT) radiomic features of the peritumoral region and clinical factors to improve SCLC diagnosis and guide surgical planning.Methods: A retrospective cohort of 113 patients (54 SCLC, 59 non-small cell lung cancer) was analyzed. CT images were processed to extract 1050 radiomic features from both intratumoral and peritumoral (2-mm expanded) ROIs. Feature selection was performed using t-tests, LASSO regression, and mRMR analysis. Logistic regression models were constructed for original and expanded ROIs, and a clinical-radiomics nomogram was developed by combining significant radiomic features with independent clinical predictors (gender, smoking history, tumor diameter, glitch, and neuron-specific enolase levels). Model performance was evaluated using ROC curves, AUC, sensitivity, specificity, and CIC curves.Results: The expanded ROI radiomics model outperformed the original ROI and clinical models, achieving higher accuracy (0.83 vs 0.76/0.70), sensitivity (0.80 vs 0.74/0.77), specificity (0.85 vs 0.75/0.65), and AUC (0.85 vs 0.76/0.71). The clinical-radiomics nomogram demonstrated superior diagnostic performance, with an AUC of 0.96 (95% CI: 0.88-1.00), accuracy of 0.91, sensitivity of 0.92, and specificity of 0.90. CIC analysis confirmed its clinical utility for surgical decision-making at intermediate-risk thresholds.Conclusion: The integration of peritumoral radiomic features and clinical factors into a nomogram provides a non-invasive tool for SCLC diagnosis and surgical planning. The superiority of the expanded model substantiates the potential presence of SCLC in peri-tumoral tissues that may be imperceptible through conventional imaging, thereby offering guidance for surgical decision-making. This approach has potential for improving treatment outcomes and warrants further validation in multicenter studies.
小细胞肺癌(SCLC)是全球癌症相关死亡的主要原因,治疗效果有限,预后差。准确的诊断和最佳的手术决策仍然是关键的挑战。本研究旨在开发和验证结合肿瘤周围区域CT放射学特征和临床因素的临床放射组学图,以提高SCLC的诊断和指导手术计划。方法:对113例患者(54例小细胞肺癌,59例非小细胞肺癌)进行回顾性分析。对CT图像进行处理,从瘤内和瘤周(2mm扩展)roi中提取1050个放射学特征。使用t检验、LASSO回归和mRMR分析进行特征选择。对原始roi和扩展roi构建了逻辑回归模型,并通过将显著的放射学特征与独立的临床预测因子(性别、吸烟史、肿瘤直径、glitch和神经元特异性烯醇化酶水平)相结合,建立了临床-放射组学nomogram。采用ROC曲线、AUC、敏感性、特异性和CIC曲线评价模型的性能。结果:扩展后的ROI放射组学模型优于原始ROI和临床模型,具有更高的准确性(0.83 vs 0.76/0.70)、灵敏度(0.80 vs 0.74/0.77)、特异性(0.85 vs 0.75/0.65)和AUC (0.85 vs 0.76/0.71)。临床放射组学影像学表现出优越的诊断性能,AUC为0.96 (95% CI: 0.88-1.00),准确性为0.91,敏感性为0.92,特异性为0.90。CIC分析证实了其在中等风险阈值下手术决策的临床应用。结论:将肿瘤周围放射学特征和临床因素整合到nomographic中,为SCLC的诊断和手术计划提供了一种无创工具。扩大模型的优越性证实了SCLC存在于肿瘤周围组织的可能性,这可能是通过常规成像无法察觉的,从而为手术决策提供指导。该方法具有改善治疗结果的潜力,值得在多中心研究中进一步验证。
{"title":"Peritumoral Radiomic Features on CT for Differential Diagnosis in Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Potential for Surgical Decision-Making.","authors":"Jie Lin, Hao Zheng, Yuan Dong, Lanqi Fu, Yujie Ding, Shucheng Huang, Shiwei Wang, Junna Wang","doi":"10.1177/10732748251351754","DOIUrl":"10.1177/10732748251351754","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide, with limited therapeutic outcomes and poor prognosis. Accurate diagnosis and optimal surgical decision-making remain critical challenges. This study aimed to develop and validate a clinical-radiomics nomogram integrating computed tomography (CT) radiomic features of the peritumoral region and clinical factors to improve SCLC diagnosis and guide surgical planning.<b>Methods:</b> A retrospective cohort of 113 patients (54 SCLC, 59 non-small cell lung cancer) was analyzed. CT images were processed to extract 1050 radiomic features from both intratumoral and peritumoral (2-mm expanded) ROIs. Feature selection was performed using t-tests, LASSO regression, and mRMR analysis. Logistic regression models were constructed for original and expanded ROIs, and a clinical-radiomics nomogram was developed by combining significant radiomic features with independent clinical predictors (gender, smoking history, tumor diameter, glitch, and neuron-specific enolase levels). Model performance was evaluated using ROC curves, AUC, sensitivity, specificity, and CIC curves.<b>Results:</b> The expanded ROI radiomics model outperformed the original ROI and clinical models, achieving higher accuracy (0.83 vs 0.76/0.70), sensitivity (0.80 vs 0.74/0.77), specificity (0.85 vs 0.75/0.65), and AUC (0.85 vs 0.76/0.71). The clinical-radiomics nomogram demonstrated superior diagnostic performance, with an AUC of 0.96 (95% CI: 0.88-1.00), accuracy of 0.91, sensitivity of 0.92, and specificity of 0.90. CIC analysis confirmed its clinical utility for surgical decision-making at intermediate-risk thresholds.<b>Conclusion:</b> The integration of peritumoral radiomic features and clinical factors into a nomogram provides a non-invasive tool for SCLC diagnosis and surgical planning. The superiority of the expanded model substantiates the potential presence of SCLC in peri-tumoral tissues that may be imperceptible through conventional imaging, thereby offering guidance for surgical decision-making. This approach has potential for improving treatment outcomes and warrants further validation in multicenter studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":49093,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Control","volume":"32 ","pages":"10732748251351754"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12174677/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144310713","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01Epub Date: 2025-06-10DOI: 10.1177/10732748251347917
Xin Ma, Shaofeng Yang, Donghai Li
Breast cancer remains the malignant tumor with the highest incidence among female patients globally, and its treatment represents a well-recognized clinical challenge. Recent studies have demonstrated that the tumor microenvironment (TME) exerts a substantial influence on breast cancer progression, whereby alterations in its internal molecular components ultimately impact disease outcomes. Key factors implicated in this process include adipokines and microRNAs (miRNAs). This review provides a detailed description of how different adipocytokines exert specific mechanistic effects on breast cancer cells. By integrating adipokines with miRNAs, the discussion explores their combined roles in the initiation and progression of breast cancer, addressing a previously unaddressed research gap in studies focusing solely on individual adipokines. Furthermore, by examining the interactions between miRNAs and signaling pathways, this analysis offers a holistic perspective on the TME network, thereby fostering new therapeutic insights for breast cancer management.
{"title":"New Insights Into Adipokines and the Tumor Microenvironment in Breast Cancer.","authors":"Xin Ma, Shaofeng Yang, Donghai Li","doi":"10.1177/10732748251347917","DOIUrl":"10.1177/10732748251347917","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Breast cancer remains the malignant tumor with the highest incidence among female patients globally, and its treatment represents a well-recognized clinical challenge. Recent studies have demonstrated that the tumor microenvironment (TME) exerts a substantial influence on breast cancer progression, whereby alterations in its internal molecular components ultimately impact disease outcomes. Key factors implicated in this process include adipokines and microRNAs (miRNAs). This review provides a detailed description of how different adipocytokines exert specific mechanistic effects on breast cancer cells. By integrating adipokines with miRNAs, the discussion explores their combined roles in the initiation and progression of breast cancer, addressing a previously unaddressed research gap in studies focusing solely on individual adipokines. Furthermore, by examining the interactions between miRNAs and signaling pathways, this analysis offers a holistic perspective on the TME network, thereby fostering new therapeutic insights for breast cancer management.</p>","PeriodicalId":49093,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Control","volume":"32 ","pages":"10732748251347917"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12152388/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144267767","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01Epub Date: 2025-09-03DOI: 10.1177/10732748251374419
Vanessa Schick, Abigail Grace, F Tiffany Quan, Cathy Troisi, Jack Tsai
IntroductionHepatitis B and C (HBV/HCV) are bloodborne infections, with individuals who have histories of substance use and homelessness bearing a disproportionate risk. Long-standing difficulties in engaging these populations have made testing and treatment challenging. This retrospective observational study describes a community-based approach to HBV/HCV prevention and treatment, comparing the effectiveness of different engagement site types in reaching and engaging this high-need population.MethodsGRASSROOTS HEALTH was launched in 2018 to improve HBV/HCV care by providing on-site testing, HBV vaccination, treatment navigation, and adherence support across various housing and drop-in centers. Outcomes were tracked through REDCap and analyzed by engagement site.ResultsGRASSROOTS HEALTH reached nearly 2000 clients, with the greatest needs for HCV treatment in drop-in centers and HBV vaccination in low-income/permanent supportive housing. All sites demonstrated a relatively high return on effort, as evidenced by the percentage of participants needing HBV vaccination or HCV/HBV treatment.ConclusionEngaging individuals through housing and service centers effectively reached a high-need community, with findings suggesting that different engagement points may enhance outreach based on the primary focus (HCV treatment vs HBV vaccination).
{"title":"Optimizing Community-Based Hepatitis B and C Care for Engaging Housing-Insecure Individuals.","authors":"Vanessa Schick, Abigail Grace, F Tiffany Quan, Cathy Troisi, Jack Tsai","doi":"10.1177/10732748251374419","DOIUrl":"10.1177/10732748251374419","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>IntroductionHepatitis B and C (HBV/HCV) are bloodborne infections, with individuals who have histories of substance use and homelessness bearing a disproportionate risk. Long-standing difficulties in engaging these populations have made testing and treatment challenging. This retrospective observational study describes a community-based approach to HBV/HCV prevention and treatment, comparing the effectiveness of different engagement site types in reaching and engaging this high-need population.MethodsGRASSROOTS HEALTH was launched in 2018 to improve HBV/HCV care by providing on-site testing, HBV vaccination, treatment navigation, and adherence support across various housing and drop-in centers. Outcomes were tracked through REDCap and analyzed by engagement site.ResultsGRASSROOTS HEALTH reached nearly 2000 clients, with the greatest needs for HCV treatment in drop-in centers and HBV vaccination in low-income/permanent supportive housing. All sites demonstrated a relatively high return on effort, as evidenced by the percentage of participants needing HBV vaccination or HCV/HBV treatment.ConclusionEngaging individuals through housing and service centers effectively reached a high-need community, with findings suggesting that different engagement points may enhance outreach based on the primary focus (HCV treatment vs HBV vaccination).</p>","PeriodicalId":49093,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Control","volume":"32 ","pages":"10732748251374419"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12409017/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144994059","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01Epub Date: 2025-09-04DOI: 10.1177/10732748251376793
Hilmi Yazici, Ahmet Cem Esmer, Sena Altunsu, Barış Dağdemir, Aysenur Yildiz, Sevket Cumhur Yegen
IntroductionThis retrospective study compares the outcomes of right hemicolectomy (RHC) and extended right hemicolectomy (ERHC) in patients with hepatic flexure and proximal transverse colon tumors.MethodsData from 85 patients who underwent surgery for colonic adenocarcinoma between January 2015 and December 2023 were analyzed retrospectively. Patients who had hepatic flexure and proximal transverse colon tumors were included in the analysis. Patients were divided into two groups: RHC and ERHC. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS), with secondary outcomes including postoperative complications and pathological data.ResultsThe RHC group comprised 46 patients, while the EHRC group had 39 patients. The study found no significant difference in 5-year OS (77% RHC vs 69% ERHC, P = 0.135) or 5-year DFS (87% RHC vs 81% ERHC, P = 0.388) between the two groups. Although the ERHC group had a higher number of harvested lymph nodes (27 vs 22, P = 0.022), this did not correlate with improved survival outcomes. Tumor localization was identified as a significant factor influencing OS, with hepatic flexure tumors showing better survival compared to proximal transverse colon tumors. No significant differences were observed between the groups regarding postoperative complications.ConclusionOur study suggests that while ERHC leads to a higher lymph node yield, it does not significantly improve survival outcomes compared to RHC in patients with hepatic flexure and proximal transverse colon tumors. Further research is needed to optimize surgical strategies and improve patient outcomes.
本回顾性研究比较了右半结肠切除术(RHC)和扩大右半结肠切除术(ERHC)治疗肝屈曲和近端横结肠肿瘤的疗效。方法回顾性分析2015年1月至2023年12月85例结肠腺癌手术患者的资料。有肝屈曲和近端横结肠肿瘤的患者也被纳入分析。患者分为RHC组和ERHC组。主要终点是总生存期(OS)和无病生存期(DFS),次要终点包括术后并发症和病理数据。结果RHC组46例,EHRC组39例。研究发现两组间5年OS (77% RHC vs 69% ERHC, P = 0.135)或5年DFS (87% RHC vs 81% ERHC, P = 0.388)无显著差异。虽然ERHC组有更多的淋巴结(27 vs 22, P = 0.022),但这与生存结果的改善无关。肿瘤定位被认为是影响OS的重要因素,与近端横结肠肿瘤相比,肝屈曲肿瘤的生存率更高。两组术后并发症无明显差异。结论我们的研究表明,虽然ERHC导致更高的淋巴结产量,但与RHC相比,ERHC并未显著改善肝屈曲和近端横结肠肿瘤患者的生存结果。需要进一步的研究来优化手术策略和改善患者的预后。
{"title":"Long-Term Prognostic Outcomes of Right Hemicolectomy and Extended Right Hemicolectomy Performed for Hepatic Flexura and Proximal Transverse Colon Tumors.","authors":"Hilmi Yazici, Ahmet Cem Esmer, Sena Altunsu, Barış Dağdemir, Aysenur Yildiz, Sevket Cumhur Yegen","doi":"10.1177/10732748251376793","DOIUrl":"10.1177/10732748251376793","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>IntroductionThis retrospective study compares the outcomes of right hemicolectomy (RHC) and extended right hemicolectomy (ERHC) in patients with hepatic flexure and proximal transverse colon tumors.MethodsData from 85 patients who underwent surgery for colonic adenocarcinoma between January 2015 and December 2023 were analyzed retrospectively. Patients who had hepatic flexure and proximal transverse colon tumors were included in the analysis. Patients were divided into two groups: RHC and ERHC. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS), with secondary outcomes including postoperative complications and pathological data.ResultsThe RHC group comprised 46 patients, while the EHRC group had 39 patients. The study found no significant difference in 5-year OS (77% RHC vs 69% ERHC, <i>P</i> = 0.135) or 5-year DFS (87% RHC vs 81% ERHC, <i>P</i> = 0.388) between the two groups. Although the ERHC group had a higher number of harvested lymph nodes (27 vs 22, <i>P</i> = 0.022), this did not correlate with improved survival outcomes. Tumor localization was identified as a significant factor influencing OS, with hepatic flexure tumors showing better survival compared to proximal transverse colon tumors. No significant differences were observed between the groups regarding postoperative complications.ConclusionOur study suggests that while ERHC leads to a higher lymph node yield, it does not significantly improve survival outcomes compared to RHC in patients with hepatic flexure and proximal transverse colon tumors. Further research is needed to optimize surgical strategies and improve patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":49093,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Control","volume":"32 ","pages":"10732748251376793"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12411710/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145001758","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01Epub Date: 2025-11-29DOI: 10.1177/10732748251403222
Di Sun, Liyan Dong, Yue Sun, Yingchao Li, Junyuan Yin, Ran Wang, Deli Zou, Xingshun Qi
BackgroundPatients with liver cirrhosis are at a higher risk of developing non-hepatic cancers (NHC) than general population. Considering that NHC causes poor outcomes, it is necessary to explore the prevalence of NHC in such patients and identify its associated risk factors.MethodsPatients with a diagnosis of liver cirrhosis who were consecutively admitted to our hospital between January 1, 2010 and June 30, 2014 were retrospectively screened. They were divided into NHC, primary liver cancer (PLC), and non-cancer groups. After adjusting for age and sex, logistic regression analyses were performed to explore the risk factors of NHC in patients with cirrhosis. Adjusted odds ratios (aORs) with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated.ResultsOverall, 2509 patients with cirrhosis were included. Prevalence of NHC and PLC was 6.22% (156/2509) and 22.20% (557/2509), respectively. After adjusting for age and sex, the NHC group had a significantly higher proportion of history of smoking (aOR = 1.994; 95% CI = 1.231-3.231, P = 0.005), but lower proportions of history of encephalopathy (aOR = 0.344; 95% CI = 0.147- 0.804, P = 0.014) and history of heart disease (aOR = 0.300; 95% CI = 0.173-0.519, P < 0.001) as compared to the non-cancer group. Hepatitis B virus infection (aOR = 0.863; 95% CI = 0.581-1.281, P = 0.465), hepatitis C virus infection (aOR = 0.908; 95% CI = 0.503-1.642, P = 0.750), and alcohol abuse alone (aOR = 1.254; 95% CI = 0.779-2.017, P = 0.351) as the etiology of liver cirrhosis were not significantly associated with the risk of NHC.ConclusionsSmoking may be associated with a higher probability of NHC in patients with cirrhosis, but the probability of NHC may be compromised by encephalopathy or heart disease.
背景:肝硬化患者发生非肝癌(NHC)的风险高于普通人群。考虑到NHC会导致不良的预后,有必要探讨这类患者的NHC患病率,并确定其相关的危险因素。方法回顾性筛选2010年1月1日至2014年6月30日我院连续收治的肝硬化患者。将患者分为肝癌组、原发性肝癌组和非肝癌组。在调整年龄和性别后,进行logistic回归分析,探讨肝硬化患者发生NHC的危险因素。计算校正优势比(aORs)及其95%置信区间(CIs)。结果共纳入2509例肝硬化患者。NHC患病率为6.22% (156/2509),PLC患病率为22.20%(557/2509)。在调整年龄和性别后,NHC组吸烟史的比例显著高于非癌症组(aOR = 1.994, 95% CI = 1.231 ~ 3.231, P = 0.005),脑病史(aOR = 0.344, 95% CI = 0.147 ~ 0.804, P = 0.014)和心脏病史(aOR = 0.300, 95% CI = 0.173 ~ 0.519, P < 0.001)的比例显著低于非癌症组。乙型肝炎病毒感染(aOR = 0.863, 95% CI = 0.581-1.281, P = 0.465)、丙型肝炎病毒感染(aOR = 0.908, 95% CI = 0.503-1.642, P = 0.750)和单纯酗酒(aOR = 1.254, 95% CI = 0.779-2.017, P = 0.351)作为肝硬化病因与NHC风险无显著相关性。结论吸烟可能与肝硬化患者较高的NHC发生率有关,但NHC发生率可能因脑病或心脏病而降低。
{"title":"Prevalence and Risk Factors for Non-Hepatic Cancers in Cirrhosis: A Cross-Sectional Study.","authors":"Di Sun, Liyan Dong, Yue Sun, Yingchao Li, Junyuan Yin, Ran Wang, Deli Zou, Xingshun Qi","doi":"10.1177/10732748251403222","DOIUrl":"10.1177/10732748251403222","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundPatients with liver cirrhosis are at a higher risk of developing non-hepatic cancers (NHC) than general population. Considering that NHC causes poor outcomes, it is necessary to explore the prevalence of NHC in such patients and identify its associated risk factors.MethodsPatients with a diagnosis of liver cirrhosis who were consecutively admitted to our hospital between January 1, 2010 and June 30, 2014 were retrospectively screened. They were divided into NHC, primary liver cancer (PLC), and non-cancer groups. After adjusting for age and sex, logistic regression analyses were performed to explore the risk factors of NHC in patients with cirrhosis. Adjusted odds ratios (aORs) with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated.ResultsOverall, 2509 patients with cirrhosis were included. Prevalence of NHC and PLC was 6.22% (156/2509) and 22.20% (557/2509), respectively. After adjusting for age and sex, the NHC group had a significantly higher proportion of history of smoking (aOR = 1.994; 95% CI = 1.231-3.231, <i>P</i> = 0.005), but lower proportions of history of encephalopathy (aOR = 0.344; 95% CI = 0.147- 0.804, <i>P</i> = 0.014) and history of heart disease (aOR = 0.300; 95% CI = 0.173-0.519, <i>P</i> < 0.001) as compared to the non-cancer group. Hepatitis B virus infection (aOR = 0.863; 95% CI = 0.581-1.281, <i>P</i> = 0.465), hepatitis C virus infection (aOR = 0.908; 95% CI = 0.503-1.642, <i>P</i> = 0.750), and alcohol abuse alone (aOR = 1.254; 95% CI = 0.779-2.017, <i>P</i> = 0.351) as the etiology of liver cirrhosis were not significantly associated with the risk of NHC.ConclusionsSmoking may be associated with a higher probability of NHC in patients with cirrhosis, but the probability of NHC may be compromised by encephalopathy or heart disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":49093,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Control","volume":"32 ","pages":"10732748251403222"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12665026/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145642356","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
IntroductionCancer screening programs are pivotal in facilitating early tumor detection and reducing cancer-related mortality. However, the reliance on individual performance indicators may not offer a fully integrated perspective of screening effectiveness. This study aimed to develop a composite indicator that consolidates key screening metrics using Principal Component Analysis (PCA) to derive objective weights.MethodsData were drawn from the annual collection of breast and colorectal cancer screening activities conducted in 2023 by the eight regional health authorities (ATSs) of Lombardy, Italy. Indicators spanning structural, organizational, clinical-diagnostic, and impact dimensions were standardized and analyzed using PCA. The resulting factor loadings informed weights for computing a weighted arithmetic mean of the z-scored indicators. Robustness was evaluated through sensitivity analyses involving alternative normalization techniques. Additionally, comparisons were made against an equally weighted arithmetic mean of the same indicators.ResultsThe composite indicator identified marked geographical variations in screening performance across Lombardy's ATSs. Structural and organizational factors, particularly examination coverage and participation rates, exerted the greatest influence on overall effectiveness in both breast and colorectal screening programs. In contrast, clinical-diagnostic and impact measures, as well as invitation coverage, contributed less substantially. High correlations in the sensitivity analyses affirmed the reliability of the proposed methodology.ConclusionsAdopting a composite indicator can substantially improve the evaluation of cancer screening initiatives by integrating diverse metrics into a cohesive, objective framework. In doing so, it enables more effective resource allocation, enhances adherence strategies, and guides targeted interventions aimed at bolstering screening success.
{"title":"Improving Cancer Screening Program Evaluation Through Principal Component Analysis-Driven Composite Indicators: Evidence From Lombardy, Italy.","authors":"Rossella Murtas, Brunella Frammartino, Danilo Cereda, Silvia Deandrea, Antonio Giampiero Russo","doi":"10.1177/10732748251406685","DOIUrl":"10.1177/10732748251406685","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>IntroductionCancer screening programs are pivotal in facilitating early tumor detection and reducing cancer-related mortality. However, the reliance on individual performance indicators may not offer a fully integrated perspective of screening effectiveness. This study aimed to develop a composite indicator that consolidates key screening metrics using Principal Component Analysis (PCA) to derive objective weights.MethodsData were drawn from the annual collection of breast and colorectal cancer screening activities conducted in 2023 by the eight regional health authorities (ATSs) of Lombardy, Italy. Indicators spanning structural, organizational, clinical-diagnostic, and impact dimensions were standardized and analyzed using PCA. The resulting factor loadings informed weights for computing a weighted arithmetic mean of the z-scored indicators. Robustness was evaluated through sensitivity analyses involving alternative normalization techniques. Additionally, comparisons were made against an equally weighted arithmetic mean of the same indicators.ResultsThe composite indicator identified marked geographical variations in screening performance across Lombardy's ATSs. Structural and organizational factors, particularly examination coverage and participation rates, exerted the greatest influence on overall effectiveness in both breast and colorectal screening programs. In contrast, clinical-diagnostic and impact measures, as well as invitation coverage, contributed less substantially. High correlations in the sensitivity analyses affirmed the reliability of the proposed methodology.ConclusionsAdopting a composite indicator can substantially improve the evaluation of cancer screening initiatives by integrating diverse metrics into a cohesive, objective framework. In doing so, it enables more effective resource allocation, enhances adherence strategies, and guides targeted interventions aimed at bolstering screening success.</p>","PeriodicalId":49093,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Control","volume":"32 ","pages":"10732748251406685"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12722689/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145806402","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1177/10732748251316598
Christopher Guske, Nusheen Immen, Devon Conant, Jose Laborde, Joshua Linscott, Mitchell Hayes, Seyed Behzad Jazayeri, Adnan Fazili, Erin Siegel, Sophie Dessureault, Julian Sanchez, Amalia Stefanou, Brandon Manley, Seth Felder
Introduction: Total pelvic exenteration (TPE) for clinical T4b colorectal cancer (CRC) is associated with significant morbidity. Short (0-30 days)- and intermediate (31-90 days)-term temporal analysis of complication onset is not well described, yet needed, to better counsel patients considering TPE.
Methods: A retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients with primary or recurrent clinical T4b pelvic CRC undergoing open TPE between 2014 and 2023 was conducted. Clinicopathologic variables were collected for each patient. Postoperative morbidity was classified according to the Clavien-Dindo (CD) grade system and stratified by time of onset within 90 days of surgery. Pearson's Chi-square test, Fisher's Exact test, and the Mann-Whitney U test were used to compare primary vs recurrent patient groups, and logistic regression assessed predictors of postoperative morbidity. Statistical analysis was performed using R with two-sided significance set at <0.05.
Results: Twenty-seven patients were identified of which 24 (88.9%) were male with a median age of 60.4 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 56.3-70.5). Seventeen (63.0%) patients had primary disease and 10 (37.0%) had recurrent CRC. Twenty-three (85.2%) patients experienced at least one complication within 90 days of surgery, but no mortality was observed. Ten (37.0%) patients experienced a CD ≥ 3 event, of which 40% took place beyond 30 days. The most common complication overall was anemia requiring transfusion, while the most common major complication was pelvic abscess. No clinicopathologic variables analyzed were predictive of major postoperative complication within 90 days of TPE.
Conclusion: TPE for clinical T4b CRC carries a high risk of postoperative morbidity in both the short- and intermediate-term after surgery, with a significant proportion of complications occurring after 30 days. Given the magnitude of operation, an extended recovery with high risk for complications is common. Although a single-center series, this annotated postoperative complication profile may assist patients and clinicians when reviewing informed consent for TPE.
{"title":"Short- and Intermediate-Term Morbidity Following Total Pelvic Exenteration in Colorectal Cancer.","authors":"Christopher Guske, Nusheen Immen, Devon Conant, Jose Laborde, Joshua Linscott, Mitchell Hayes, Seyed Behzad Jazayeri, Adnan Fazili, Erin Siegel, Sophie Dessureault, Julian Sanchez, Amalia Stefanou, Brandon Manley, Seth Felder","doi":"10.1177/10732748251316598","DOIUrl":"10.1177/10732748251316598","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Total pelvic exenteration (TPE) for clinical T4b colorectal cancer (CRC) is associated with significant morbidity. Short (0-30 days)- and intermediate (31-90 days)-term temporal analysis of complication onset is not well described, yet needed, to better counsel patients considering TPE.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients with primary or recurrent clinical T4b pelvic CRC undergoing open TPE between 2014 and 2023 was conducted. Clinicopathologic variables were collected for each patient. Postoperative morbidity was classified according to the Clavien-Dindo (CD) grade system and stratified by time of onset within 90 days of surgery. Pearson's Chi-square test, Fisher's Exact test, and the Mann-Whitney U test were used to compare primary vs recurrent patient groups, and logistic regression assessed predictors of postoperative morbidity. Statistical analysis was performed using R with two-sided significance set at <0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-seven patients were identified of which 24 (88.9%) were male with a median age of 60.4 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 56.3-70.5). Seventeen (63.0%) patients had primary disease and 10 (37.0%) had recurrent CRC. Twenty-three (85.2%) patients experienced at least one complication within 90 days of surgery, but no mortality was observed. Ten (37.0%) patients experienced a CD ≥ 3 event, of which 40% took place beyond 30 days. The most common complication overall was anemia requiring transfusion, while the most common major complication was pelvic abscess. No clinicopathologic variables analyzed were predictive of major postoperative complication within 90 days of TPE.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>TPE for clinical T4b CRC carries a high risk of postoperative morbidity in both the short- and intermediate-term after surgery, with a significant proportion of complications occurring after 30 days. Given the magnitude of operation, an extended recovery with high risk for complications is common. Although a single-center series, this annotated postoperative complication profile may assist patients and clinicians when reviewing informed consent for TPE.</p>","PeriodicalId":49093,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Control","volume":"32 ","pages":"10732748251316598"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11758541/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143030213","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}