首页 > 最新文献

Journal of Communication Disorders最新文献

英文 中文
Predicting attitudes related to stuttering from an international database 从国际数据库中预测与口吃有关的态度。
IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-07 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2024.106457
Kenneth O. St. Louis

Purpose

A vast number of studies over the past 50 years have explored public and professional attitudes toward stuttering, and many of them have identified variables that predict more—or less—positive attitudes. Part I of this study summarized 91 studies in terms of consistency of prediction of stuttering attitudes. Part II sought to compare a considerable number of potential predictors and to quantify their prediction strengths.

Method

Thirty-seven predictors were analyzed in linear regression models using a retrospective analysis of a database consisting of 22,413 respondents from 44 countries who had filled out the Public Opinion Survey of Human Attributes–Stuttering (POSHA–S) in 26 different languages. Dependent variables were two POSHA–S subscores, Beliefs about stuttering and Self Reactions to people who stutter, as well as the mean of these two subscores, the Overall Stuttering Score.

Results

All 37 predictors were statistically significant for most—but at least one—of the three scores. The strongest predictors related to regions of the world and related variables of countries and languages, with greater strength for Beliefs than for Self Reactions. Knowing persons who stutter, or knowing about stuttering, were moderate predictors of Self Reactions but weak predictors of Beliefs. Different populations, such as the public, students, or speech-language pathologists, moderately predicted attitudes on all three dependent variables while education level and self-ratings of ability to speak were weak predictors. Sex (gender), age, income, parental or marital status, and most of 12 life priorities (e.g., get things done; be safe and secure) had very weak and practically insignificant predictive potential.

Conclusions

The study confirmed previous research showing ambiguous results for such predictors as sex and age but consistent differences from various geographic regions. Beliefs and Self Reactions measure different constructs that are often predicted differently by variables.
目的:在过去的 50 年中,有大量的研究探讨了公众和专业人士对口吃的态度,其中许多研究确定了可以预测较积极或较不积极态度的变量。本研究的第一部分总结了 91 项研究对口吃态度预测的一致性。第二部分试图对大量潜在的预测因素进行比较,并量化其预测强度:通过对来自 44 个国家、用 26 种不同语言填写了《人类属性-口吃民意调查》(POSHA-S)的 22,413 名受访者的数据库进行回顾性分析,在线性回归模型中对 37 个预测因子进行了分析。因变量是 POSHA-S 的两个子分数,即对口吃的看法和对口吃患者的自我反应,以及这两个子分数的平均值,即口吃总分:所有 37 个预测因子对三个评分中的大多数--但至少有一个--都有统计学意义。最强的预测因子与世界地区以及国家和语言的相关变量有关,其中 "信念 "的预测因子比 "自我反应 "的预测因子更强。认识口吃患者或了解口吃对 "自我反应 "的预测作用一般,但对 "信念 "的预测作用较弱。不同的人群,如公众、学生或语言病理学家,对所有三个因变量的态度都有中等程度的预测作用,而教育水平和对说话能力的自我评价的预测作用较弱。性(性别)、年龄、收入、父母或婚姻状况以及 12 个生活优先事项中的大多数(例如,完成任务;安全可靠)的预测潜力非常弱,实际上并不显著:这项研究证实了之前的研究结果,即性别和年龄等预测因素的结果不明确,但不同地理区域的差异一致。信念 "和 "自我反应 "测量的是不同的结构,而这些结构往往会受到不同变量的影响。
{"title":"Predicting attitudes related to stuttering from an international database","authors":"Kenneth O. St. Louis","doi":"10.1016/j.jcomdis.2024.106457","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jcomdis.2024.106457","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>A vast number of studies over the past 50 years have explored public and professional attitudes toward stuttering, and many of them have identified variables that predict more—or less—positive attitudes. Part I of this study summarized 91 studies in terms of consistency of prediction of stuttering attitudes. Part II sought to compare a considerable number of potential predictors and to quantify their prediction strengths.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>Thirty-seven predictors were analyzed in linear regression models using a retrospective analysis of a database consisting of 22,413 respondents from 44 countries who had filled out the <em>Public Opinion Survey of Human Attributes–Stuttering</em> (<em>POSHA–S</em>) in 26 different languages. Dependent variables were two <em>POSHA–S</em> subscores, Beliefs about stuttering and Self Reactions to people who stutter, as well as the mean of these two subscores, the Overall Stuttering Score.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>All 37 predictors were statistically significant for most—but at least one—of the three scores. The strongest predictors related to regions of the world and related variables of countries and languages, with greater strength for Beliefs than for Self Reactions. Knowing persons who stutter, or knowing about stuttering, were moderate predictors of Self Reactions but weak predictors of Beliefs. Different populations, such as the public, students, or speech-language pathologists, moderately predicted attitudes on all three dependent variables while education level and self-ratings of ability to speak were weak predictors. Sex (gender), age, income, parental or marital status, and most of 12 life priorities (e.g., get things done; be safe and secure) had very weak and practically insignificant predictive potential.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The study confirmed previous research showing ambiguous results for such predictors as sex and age but consistent differences from various geographic regions. Beliefs and Self Reactions measure different constructs that are often predicted differently by variables.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49175,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Communication Disorders","volume":"112 ","pages":"Article 106457"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2024-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142478809","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Overlapping hearing and communication profiles for the deletion and the RAI1 variant form of Smith-Magenis Syndrome (SMS) 史密斯-马盖尼综合征(SMS)的听力和沟通特征与RAI1缺失型和RAI1变异型重叠
IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2024.106455
Christine Brennan, Rachael R. Baiduc

Smith-Magenis syndrome (SMS), a rare, genetically linked complex developmental disorder is associated with hearing loss and delays in speech-language development. Approximately 70 % of those with SMS have a genetic deletion within chromosome 17p11.2 and 10 % have a single gene mutation in the same area, known as the RAI1 variant form of SMS. Previous studies presented preliminary comparisons of the phenotype of those with deletion versus the mutation form of SMS, but none focused on hearing, speech-language, and communication profiles. The current study examined patient registry data and compared two groups of individuals with SMS to determine if genetic differences influence the communication phenotype and to determine the importance of the RAI1 gene in hearing, speech, and language abilities in children. Speech-language and hearing data from the international SMS Patient Registry for 33 subjects with SMS were analyzed: 23 with a genetic deletion (SMS (del)) and 10 with an RAI1 mutation (SMS (RAI1)). Hearing status, otopathology findings, early speech-language milestones, mode of communication, intelligibility, vocal quality, language abilities, and literacy skills were analyzed. There were small differences between the groups for hearing status, otopathological findings, mode of communication, voice quality, intelligibility, speech-language abilities, and literacy. Overlap in the speech-language phenotype between groups confirms previous hypotheses that suggest haploinsufficiency of the RAI1 gene is responsible for the SMS phenotype and that the RAI1 gene is critical for speech-language development. Future studies should include direct testing of receptive and expressive language abilities, including analyses of language samples, with larger groups of individuals to replicate and extend the current findings.

史密斯-马盖尼综合征(SMS)是一种罕见的遗传性复杂发育障碍,与听力损失和言语发育迟缓有关。大约 70% 的 SMS 患者的染色体 17p11.2 存在基因缺失,10% 的患者在同一区域存在单基因突变,即 SMS 的 RAI1 变异型。以前的研究对 SMS 基因缺失和基因突变患者的表型进行了初步比较,但没有一项研究关注听力、语言和沟通方面的情况。本研究对患者登记数据进行了检查,并对两组 SMS 患者进行了比较,以确定遗传差异是否会影响交流表型,并确定 RAI1 基因在儿童听力、言语和语言能力方面的重要性。研究人员分析了来自国际 SMS 患者登记处的 33 名 SMS 患者的言语和听力数据:其中 23 人基因缺失(SMS (del)),10 人 RAI1 基因突变(SMS (RAI1))。分析了听力状况、耳科检查结果、早期言语发育里程碑、交流方式、可懂程度、发声质量、语言能力和识字能力。在听力状况、耳科检查结果、交流方式、声音质量、清晰度、语言能力和识字能力方面,各组之间的差异很小。各组之间言语表型的重叠证实了之前的假设,即 RAI1 基因的单倍性缺失是 SMS 表型的原因,而且 RAI1 基因对言语发育至关重要。未来的研究应包括直接测试接受性和表达性语言能力,包括分析语言样本,以复制和扩展目前的研究结果。
{"title":"Overlapping hearing and communication profiles for the deletion and the RAI1 variant form of Smith-Magenis Syndrome (SMS)","authors":"Christine Brennan,&nbsp;Rachael R. Baiduc","doi":"10.1016/j.jcomdis.2024.106455","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jcomdis.2024.106455","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Smith-Magenis syndrome (SMS), a rare, genetically linked complex developmental disorder is associated with hearing loss and delays in speech-language development. Approximately 70 % of those with SMS have a genetic deletion within chromosome 17p11.2 and 10 % have a single gene mutation in the same area, known as the RAI1 variant form of SMS. Previous studies presented preliminary comparisons of the phenotype of those with deletion versus the mutation form of SMS, but none focused on hearing, speech-language, and communication profiles. The current study examined patient registry data and compared two groups of individuals with SMS to determine if genetic differences influence the communication phenotype and to determine the importance of the RAI1 gene in hearing, speech, and language abilities in children. Speech-language and hearing data from the international SMS Patient Registry for 33 subjects with SMS were analyzed: 23 with a genetic deletion (SMS (del)) and 10 with an RAI1 mutation (SMS (RAI1)). Hearing status, otopathology findings, early speech-language milestones, mode of communication, intelligibility, vocal quality, language abilities, and literacy skills were analyzed. There were small differences between the groups for hearing status, otopathological findings, mode of communication, voice quality, intelligibility, speech-language abilities, and literacy. Overlap in the speech-language phenotype between groups confirms previous hypotheses that suggest haploinsufficiency of the RAI1 gene is responsible for the SMS phenotype and that the RAI1 gene is critical for speech-language development. Future studies should include direct testing of receptive and expressive language abilities, including analyses of language samples, with larger groups of individuals to replicate and extend the current findings.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49175,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Communication Disorders","volume":"111 ","pages":"Article 106455"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142094865","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Differences in the type of vocabulary understood by deaf and hearing students: Results to guide interventions 聋哑学生和健听学生理解词汇类型的差异:指导干预措施的结果
IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-08-20 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2024.106458
Antonia González-Cuenca, Marina González-Jerez, María José Linero, Rocío Lavigne

Introduction

Vocabulary knowledge is an essential element in language development. There is evidence of significant differences in vocabulary knowledge between deaf children and hearing peers of the same age. These differences put deaf students at a disadvantage when compared to their hearing counterparts. The aim of this study was to investigate whether certain types of words characterise the lexical difficulties of deaf students. Our starting point is that this knowledge is needed to design interventions that are adapted to the particular needs of these students for their lexical development.

Methods

We evaluated the lexical comprehension of 90 Spanish students. The sample comprised 45 hearing students and 45 students with severe or profound hearing loss. Both groups were attending the later years of primary school (8 to –12-year-olds). They were tested using the Spanish Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-III. The performance of both groups was statistically compared using percentiles and standard scores as well as a selected set of words from the test.

Results

No significant differences between hearing and deaf groups were found by age, sex, and sociocultural level. Significant differences were found between groups in their percentile and standard scores. There were no significant differences in performance between the two groups on only five of the 25 words with the highest error rate in the deaf group. The qualitative analysis of the remaining 20 words that were especially challenging for deaf students reveals results of interest which could help guide interventions.

Conclusions

The results indicate the need for lexical intervention for deaf students in the final years of primary school. The specialised support service for deaf learners should approach the intervention by targeting a specific type of vocabulary, making the semantic relationships between these words more transparent and promoting a deeper understanding of them.

导言词汇知识是语言发展的基本要素。有证据表明,聋哑儿童与同龄的健听儿童在词汇知识方面存在显著差异。这些差异使得聋哑学生与听力正常的学生相比处于劣势。本研究的目的是调查某些类型的词汇是否是聋哑学生词汇困难的特征。我们的出发点是,需要这方面的知识来设计干预措施,以适应这些学生词汇发展的特殊需要。样本包括 45 名听力学生和 45 名重度或极重度听力损失学生。两组学生都是小学低年级学生(8 至 12 岁)。他们接受了西班牙语皮博迪图画词汇测试-III。结果 听力组和聋人组在年龄、性别和社会文化水平方面没有发现显著差异。各组之间在百分位数和标准分数上存在显著差异。在聋人组错误率最高的 25 个单词中,只有 5 个单词的成绩在两组之间没有明显差异。对其余 20 个对聋哑学生特别具有挑战性的单词进行的定性分析揭示了一些值得关注的结果,这些结果有助于指导干预措施。为聋哑学生提供的专门支持服务应针对特定类型的词汇进行干预,使这些词汇之间的语义关系更加透明,并促进对这些词汇的深入理解。
{"title":"Differences in the type of vocabulary understood by deaf and hearing students: Results to guide interventions","authors":"Antonia González-Cuenca,&nbsp;Marina González-Jerez,&nbsp;María José Linero,&nbsp;Rocío Lavigne","doi":"10.1016/j.jcomdis.2024.106458","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jcomdis.2024.106458","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Vocabulary knowledge is an essential element in language development. There is evidence of significant differences in vocabulary knowledge between deaf children and hearing peers of the same age. These differences put deaf students at a disadvantage when compared to their hearing counterparts. The aim of this study was to investigate whether certain types of words characterise the lexical difficulties of deaf students. Our starting point is that this knowledge is needed to design interventions that are adapted to the particular needs of these students for their lexical development.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We evaluated the lexical comprehension of 90 Spanish students. The sample comprised 45 hearing students and 45 students with severe or profound hearing loss. Both groups were attending the later years of primary school (8 to –12-year-olds). They were tested using the Spanish Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-III. The performance of both groups was statistically compared using percentiles and standard scores as well as a selected set of words from the test.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>No significant differences between hearing and deaf groups were found by age, sex, and sociocultural level. Significant differences were found between groups in their percentile and standard scores. There were no significant differences in performance between the two groups on only five of the 25 words with the highest error rate in the deaf group. The qualitative analysis of the remaining 20 words that were especially challenging for deaf students reveals results of interest which could help guide interventions.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The results indicate the need for lexical intervention for deaf students in the final years of primary school. The specialised support service for deaf learners should approach the intervention by targeting a specific type of vocabulary, making the semantic relationships between these words more transparent and promoting a deeper understanding of them.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49175,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Communication Disorders","volume":"111 ","pages":"Article 106458"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2024-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142089053","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Perceptions of and beliefs about stuttering in the Hispanic/Latino community 西班牙裔/拉美裔社区对口吃的看法和信念
IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-08-13 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2024.106456
Angela M. Medina , Jean S. Mead , Stefanie Moore

Purpose

The aim of this exploratory study was to investigate perceptions of people who stutter and beliefs about the causes and cures of stuttering within the Hispanic/Latino community.

Methods

Respondents who were 18 or older and of Hispanic/Latino origin were invited to respond to a 24-question online survey. Questions involved exploring familiarity with and beliefs regarding etiologies, treatment approaches, treatment providers, stereotypes, and perceptions of people who stutter. Data from 151 respondents were analyzed using descriptive statistics.

Results

Results revealed that the most commonly held beliefs regarding the causes of stuttering were being “born with it”, an “emotional disturbance or trauma”, a “brain disorder”, and/ or a “sensory impairment”. The most frequently cited beliefs regarding treating stuttering were “therapy”, “rehabilitation”, and “tell them to slow down”. Over 75 % of respondents believed that “speech therapists” can cure or treat stuttering. Respondents' perceptions of people who stutter are that they are generally “nervous” and “shy”.

Conclusions

Common beliefs and perceptions relative to stuttering were identified in the Hispanic/Latino community. The beliefs one holds about the cause of stuttering as well as their negative perceptions of stutterers may contribute to the continued stigmatization of people who stutter. Implications are discussed regarding the need for culturally appropriate education for individuals who stutter, their families, and the general public.

本探索性研究旨在调查西班牙裔/拉美裔社区中口吃患者的看法以及对口吃病因和治疗方法的看法。调查问题涉及口吃患者对病因、治疗方法、治疗提供者、刻板印象和看法的熟悉程度和看法。结果显示,关于口吃的原因,最常见的看法是 "天生口吃"、"情绪障碍或创伤"、"大脑失调 "和/或 "感官障碍"。在治疗口吃方面,最常提到的观点是 "治疗"、"康复 "和 "让他们慢下来"。超过 75% 的受访者认为 "语言治疗师 "可以治愈或治疗口吃。受访者对口吃患者的看法是他们通常 "紧张 "和 "害羞"。人们对口吃原因所持的信念以及对口吃患者的负面看法可能会导致口吃患者继续受到侮辱。本文讨论了为口吃患者、其家人和公众提供文化上适当的教育的必要性。
{"title":"Perceptions of and beliefs about stuttering in the Hispanic/Latino community","authors":"Angela M. Medina ,&nbsp;Jean S. Mead ,&nbsp;Stefanie Moore","doi":"10.1016/j.jcomdis.2024.106456","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jcomdis.2024.106456","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>The aim of this exploratory study was to investigate perceptions of people who stutter and beliefs about the causes and cures of stuttering within the Hispanic/Latino community.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Respondents who were 18 or older and of Hispanic/Latino origin were invited to respond to a 24-question online survey. Questions involved exploring familiarity with and beliefs regarding etiologies, treatment approaches, treatment providers, stereotypes, and perceptions of people who stutter. Data from 151 respondents were analyzed using descriptive statistics.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Results revealed that the most commonly held beliefs regarding the causes of stuttering were being “born with it”, an “emotional disturbance or trauma”, a “brain disorder”, and/ or a “sensory impairment”. The most frequently cited beliefs regarding treating stuttering were “therapy”, “rehabilitation”, and “tell them to slow down”. Over 75 % of respondents believed that “speech therapists” can cure or treat stuttering. Respondents' perceptions of people who stutter are that they are generally “nervous” and “shy”.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Common beliefs and perceptions relative to stuttering were identified in the Hispanic/Latino community. The beliefs one holds about the cause of stuttering as well as their negative perceptions of stutterers may contribute to the continued stigmatization of people who stutter. Implications are discussed regarding the need for culturally appropriate education for individuals who stutter, their families, and the general public.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49175,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Communication Disorders","volume":"111 ","pages":"Article 106456"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2024-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141998415","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Narrative reconstruction in deaf and hearing children: A comparative study in the context of Arabic diglossia 聋哑儿童和健听儿童的叙事重建:阿拉伯语失语背景下的比较研究
IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-08-08 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2024.106454
Dr. Hashemiah Almusawi, Dr. Bader Alqallaf, Dr. Amnah Hafsyan

This study explores the narrative skills of deaf and hearing children within the context of Arabic diglossia, a linguistic environment characterised by significant differences between spoken dialects and formal written language. Using Stein and Glenn's (1979) and Bruner's (1991) frameworks, the research analyses the narrative constructions of 13 hearing and 13 deaf children in Kuwait. The findings reveal that hearing children, benefiting from consistent exposure to spoken and formal Arabic, produced more coherent and detailed narratives compared to deaf children. Hearing participants also demonstrated greater vocabulary diversity. Age-related improvements in narrative skills were more pronounced among hearing children, while the impact of sign language exposure on narrative abilities was significant among deaf children. The study underscores the critical role of early language exposure and educational support in fostering narrative development, particularly in a diglossic context. These findings highlight the need for specialised educational strategies to support the unique narrative development needs of deaf children.

本研究探讨了聋哑儿童和健听儿童在阿拉伯语 "失语症"(一种以方言口语和正式书面语之间的显著差异为特征的语言环境)背景下的叙事技能。研究采用 Stein 和 Glenn(1979 年)以及 Bruner(1991 年)的框架,分析了科威特 13 名听力儿童和 13 名聋儿的叙事结构。研究结果表明,与聋哑儿童相比,听力儿童由于持续接触阿拉伯语口语和正规阿拉伯语,他们的叙述更加连贯和详细。听力参与者还表现出更大的词汇多样性。与年龄相关的叙事能力提高在听力儿童中更为明显,而手语接触对叙事能力的影响在聋哑儿童中非常显著。这项研究强调了早期语言接触和教育支持在促进叙事能力发展中的关键作用,尤其是在双语环境中。这些研究结果突出表明,有必要制定专门的教育策略,以支持聋哑儿童独特的叙事能力发展需求。
{"title":"Narrative reconstruction in deaf and hearing children: A comparative study in the context of Arabic diglossia","authors":"Dr. Hashemiah Almusawi,&nbsp;Dr. Bader Alqallaf,&nbsp;Dr. Amnah Hafsyan","doi":"10.1016/j.jcomdis.2024.106454","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jcomdis.2024.106454","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study explores the narrative skills of deaf and hearing children within the context of Arabic diglossia, a linguistic environment characterised by significant differences between spoken dialects and formal written language. Using Stein and Glenn's (1979) and Bruner's (1991) frameworks, the research analyses the narrative constructions of 13 hearing and 13 deaf children in Kuwait. The findings reveal that hearing children, benefiting from consistent exposure to spoken and formal Arabic, produced more coherent and detailed narratives compared to deaf children. Hearing participants also demonstrated greater vocabulary diversity. Age-related improvements in narrative skills were more pronounced among hearing children, while the impact of sign language exposure on narrative abilities was significant among deaf children. The study underscores the critical role of early language exposure and educational support in fostering narrative development, particularly in a diglossic context. These findings highlight the need for specialised educational strategies to support the unique narrative development needs of deaf children.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49175,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Communication Disorders","volume":"111 ","pages":"Article 106454"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141931513","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Using PAALSS for the manual analysis of language samples of individuals who use aided AAC in Spanish: A pilot study 使用 PAALSS 手动分析西班牙语辅助 AAC 使用者的语言样本:试点研究
IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-07-26 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2024.106453
Gloria Soto

This pilot study describes the application of the Protocol for the Analysis of Aided Language Samples in Spanish (PAALSS), specifically designed for the manual analysis of language samples from individuals in the early stages of Spanish aided language development. Data were collected from 22 language samples from 16 individuals who use aided AAC and are at the earlier stages of Spanish language development. The primary objective of this study was to explore the feasibility of using PAALSS as an analytical tool to describe various aspects of the language samples, including lexical productivity, lexical diversity, morphology, grammatical complexity, and syntax. Results are presented according to four different groupings, based on the language samples’ grammatical complexity scores. The study provides preliminary evidence of the potential of PAALSS as a useful tool for the manual analysis of language samples from users of AAC in Spanish. However, future studies are needed to establish its formal psychometric and measurement properties.

这项试验性研究描述了西班牙语辅助语言样本分析协议(PAALSS)的应用情况,该协议专门用于对处于西班牙语辅助语言发展早期阶段的个体的语言样本进行人工分析。本研究从 16 名使用辅助 AAC 并处于西班牙语语言发展早期阶段的个体的 22 个语言样本中收集了数据。本研究的主要目的是探索使用 PAALSS 作为分析工具来描述语言样本各个方面的可行性,包括词汇生产力、词汇多样性、词法、语法复杂性和句法。研究结果根据语言样本的语法复杂性得分按四个不同的组别呈现。这项研究提供了初步证据,证明 PAALSS 可以作为一种有用的工具,对西班牙语 AAC 用户的语言样本进行人工分析。然而,未来的研究还需要确定其正式的心理测量学和测量属性。
{"title":"Using PAALSS for the manual analysis of language samples of individuals who use aided AAC in Spanish: A pilot study","authors":"Gloria Soto","doi":"10.1016/j.jcomdis.2024.106453","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jcomdis.2024.106453","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This pilot study describes the application of the Protocol for the Analysis of Aided Language Samples in Spanish (PAALSS), specifically designed for the manual analysis of language samples from individuals in the early stages of Spanish aided language development. Data were collected from 22 language samples from 16 individuals who use aided AAC and are at the earlier stages of Spanish language development. The primary objective of this study was to explore the feasibility of using PAALSS as an analytical tool to describe various aspects of the language samples, including lexical productivity, lexical diversity, morphology, grammatical complexity, and syntax. Results are presented according to four different groupings, based on the language samples’ grammatical complexity scores. The study provides preliminary evidence of the potential of PAALSS as a useful tool for the manual analysis of language samples from users of AAC in Spanish. However, future studies are needed to establish its formal psychometric and measurement properties.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49175,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Communication Disorders","volume":"111 ","pages":"Article 106453"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2024-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141842295","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comprehension of Miranda warnings in adults with chronic, moderate-severe traumatic brain injury 慢性中重度脑外伤成人对米兰达警告的理解
IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-07-15 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2024.106452
Jade T. Mitchell , Malcolm Edwards , Kimberly Walsh , Sarah Brown-Schmidt , Melissa C. Duff

Introduction

To compare comprehension of Miranda rights in adults with traumatic brain injury (TBI) versus adults without TBI as measured by response accuracy on the Miranda Right Comprehension Instruments.

Methods

Data were collected virtually via teleconferencing from July 2022 to February 2023. Participants included 25 adults with moderate-severe TBI (12 females, 13 males) and 25 adults without TBI (12 females, 13 males), ages 20-55 years. In this observational study, both groups (with and without TBI) completed the Miranda Right Comprehension Instruments (MRCI), which includes four instruments including Comprehension of Miranda Rights, Comprehension of Miranda Rights-Recognition, Function of Rights in Interrogation, Comprehension of Miranda Vocabulary instruments. Response accuracy on the MRCI was compared across groups.

Results

The TBI group was significantly less accurate when responding to questions on the MRCI compared to the NC group.

Conclusion

Individuals with chronic moderate-severe TBI underperform their non-injured peers on the Miranda Rights Comprehension Instruments, a tool used in legal settings when there is doubt about an individual's understanding of their Miranda rights. TBI is a risk factor for disruptions in comprehension of language in legal contexts that may, in part, contribute to the increased interaction with the criminal justice system and incarceration for individuals with TBI. Implications for policy, advocating, and intervention are discussed.

导言通过米兰达权利理解工具的准确性来衡量,比较有创伤性脑损伤(TBI)和无创伤性脑损伤的成年人对米兰达权利的理解能力。方法从2022年7月到2023年2月,通过远程会议虚拟收集数据。参与者包括 25 名患有中重度 TBI 的成人(12 名女性,13 名男性)和 25 名未患有 TBI 的成人(12 名女性,13 名男性),年龄在 20-55 岁之间。在这项观察研究中,两组人(有和没有 TBI 的)都完成了米兰达权利理解工具(MRCI),其中包括米兰达权利理解、米兰达权利理解-认知、讯问中权利的功能、米兰达词汇理解等四个工具。结果与 NC 组相比,TBI 组在回答 MRCI 问题时的准确性明显较低。结论慢性中重度 TBI 患者在米兰达权利理解工具上的表现低于未受伤的同龄人,而米兰达权利理解工具是一种在法律环境中用于怀疑患者是否理解其米兰达权利的工具。创伤性脑损伤是在法律环境中影响语言理解的一个风险因素,这可能在一定程度上导致创伤性脑损伤患者与刑事司法系统的互动和监禁增加。本文讨论了对政策、宣传和干预的影响。
{"title":"Comprehension of Miranda warnings in adults with chronic, moderate-severe traumatic brain injury","authors":"Jade T. Mitchell ,&nbsp;Malcolm Edwards ,&nbsp;Kimberly Walsh ,&nbsp;Sarah Brown-Schmidt ,&nbsp;Melissa C. Duff","doi":"10.1016/j.jcomdis.2024.106452","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jcomdis.2024.106452","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>To compare comprehension of Miranda rights in adults with traumatic brain injury (TBI) versus adults without TBI as measured by response accuracy on the Miranda Right Comprehension Instruments.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Data were collected virtually via teleconferencing from July 2022 to February 2023. Participants included 25 adults with moderate-severe TBI (12 females, 13 males) and 25 adults without TBI (12 females, 13 males), ages 20-55 years. In this observational study, both groups (with and without TBI) completed the Miranda Right Comprehension Instruments (MRCI), which includes four instruments including Comprehension of Miranda Rights, Comprehension of Miranda Rights-Recognition, Function of Rights in Interrogation, Comprehension of Miranda Vocabulary instruments. Response accuracy on the MRCI was compared across groups.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The TBI group was significantly less accurate when responding to questions on the MRCI compared to the NC group.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Individuals with chronic moderate-severe TBI underperform their non-injured peers on the Miranda Rights Comprehension Instruments, a tool used in legal settings when there is doubt about an individual's understanding of their Miranda rights. TBI is a risk factor for disruptions in comprehension of language in legal contexts that may, in part, contribute to the increased interaction with the criminal justice system and incarceration for individuals with TBI. Implications for policy, advocating, and intervention are discussed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49175,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Communication Disorders","volume":"111 ","pages":"Article 106452"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2024-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021992424000480/pdfft?md5=5007918e91340b19a005e3b94bbe4e52&pid=1-s2.0-S0021992424000480-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141716501","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Aging affects Mandarin speakers’ understanding of focus sentences in quiet and noisy environments 衰老影响普通话使用者在安静和嘈杂环境中对重点句子的理解
IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-07-14 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2024.106451
Xinxian Zhao, Yang Li, Xiaohu Yang

Introduction

Older adults experiencing normal aging make up most patients seeking services at audiology clinics. While research acknowledges that the speech perception abilities of aging adults can be diminished in lower-level speech identification or discrimination, there is less concern about how aging affects higher-level speech understanding, particularly in tonal languages. This study aimed to explore the effects of aging on the comprehension of implied intentions conveyed through prosodic features in Mandarin focus sentences, both in quiet and noisy environments.

Methods

Twenty-seven younger listeners (aged 17 to 26) and 27 older listeners (aged 58 to 77) participated in a focus comprehension task. Their task was to interpret SAVO (subject-adverbial-verb-object) sentences with five focus conditions (initial subject-focus, medial adverbial-focus, medial verb-focus, final object-focus, and neutral non-focus) across five background conditions: quiet, white noise (at 0 and −10-dB signal-to-noise ratios, SNRs), and competing speech (at 0 and −10-dB SNRs). Comprehension performances were analyzed based on accuracy rates, and underlying processing patterns were evaluated using confusion matrices.

Results

Younger listeners consistently excelled across focus conditions in quiet settings, but their scores declined in white noise at the SNR of −10-dB. Older adults exhibited variability in scores across focus conditions but not in background conditions. They scored lower than their younger counterparts, with the highest scores observed in the comprehension of sentences featuring a medial adverbial-focus. Analysis of confusion matrices revealed that younger adults seldom mistook focus conditions, whereas older adults tended to comprehend the other focused items as medial adverbials.

Conclusions

Older listeners’ performance reflects their over-reliance on top-down language knowledge, while their bottom-up acoustic processing decreases when interpreting Mandarin focus sentences. These findings provide evidence of active cognitive processing in prosody comprehension among aging adults and offer insights for diagnosing and intervening with speech disorders in clinical settings.

导言正常衰老的老年人占听力诊所就诊病人的大多数。虽然研究承认老年人在低级语音识别或辨别方面的语音感知能力可能会减弱,但却较少关注衰老如何影响高级语音理解,尤其是在声调语言方面。本研究旨在探讨在安静和嘈杂的环境中,衰老对理解普通话重点句中通过前音特征传达的隐含意图的影响。他们的任务是在五种背景条件(安静、白噪声(信噪比为 0 和-10 分贝)和竞争语音(信噪比为 0 和-10 分贝))下解释具有五种焦点条件(初始主语焦点、中间副词焦点、中间动词焦点、最终宾语焦点和中性非焦点)的 SAVO(主语-副词-宾语)句子。结果在安静环境中,年轻听者在各种焦点条件下的表现都很出色,但在信噪比为 -10 分贝的白噪声中,他们的得分有所下降。老年人在不同焦点条件下的得分存在差异,但在背景条件下则没有。他们的得分低于年轻人,其中在理解以中间副词为焦点的句子时得分最高。混淆矩阵分析表明,年轻成人很少误解重点条件,而老年成人则倾向于将其他重点项目理解为中间副词。结论老年听者的表现反映了他们在解释普通话重点句子时过度依赖自上而下的语言知识,而自下而上的声学处理能力下降。这些发现为老年人在前音理解中的积极认知加工提供了证据,并为在临床环境中诊断和干预言语障碍提供了启示。
{"title":"Aging affects Mandarin speakers’ understanding of focus sentences in quiet and noisy environments","authors":"Xinxian Zhao,&nbsp;Yang Li,&nbsp;Xiaohu Yang","doi":"10.1016/j.jcomdis.2024.106451","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jcomdis.2024.106451","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Older adults experiencing normal aging make up most patients seeking services at audiology clinics. While research acknowledges that the speech perception abilities of aging adults can be diminished in lower-level speech identification or discrimination, there is less concern about how aging affects higher-level speech understanding, particularly in tonal languages. This study aimed to explore the effects of aging on the comprehension of implied intentions conveyed through prosodic features in Mandarin focus sentences, both in quiet and noisy environments.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Twenty-seven younger listeners (aged 17 to 26) and 27 older listeners (aged 58 to 77) participated in a focus comprehension task. Their task was to interpret SAVO (subject-adverbial-verb-object) sentences with five focus conditions (initial subject-focus, medial adverbial-focus, medial verb-focus, final object-focus, and neutral non-focus) across five background conditions: quiet, white noise (at 0 and −10-dB signal-to-noise ratios, SNRs), and competing speech (at 0 and −10-dB SNRs). Comprehension performances were analyzed based on accuracy rates, and underlying processing patterns were evaluated using confusion matrices.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Younger listeners consistently excelled across focus conditions in quiet settings, but their scores declined in white noise at the SNR of −10-dB. Older adults exhibited variability in scores across focus conditions but not in background conditions. They scored lower than their younger counterparts, with the highest scores observed in the comprehension of sentences featuring a medial adverbial-focus. Analysis of confusion matrices revealed that younger adults seldom mistook focus conditions, whereas older adults tended to comprehend the other focused items as medial adverbials.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Older listeners’ performance reflects their over-reliance on top-down language knowledge, while their bottom-up acoustic processing decreases when interpreting Mandarin focus sentences. These findings provide evidence of active cognitive processing in prosody comprehension among aging adults and offer insights for diagnosing and intervening with speech disorders in clinical settings.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49175,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Communication Disorders","volume":"111 ","pages":"Article 106451"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2024-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141694192","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Using semantic verbal fluency to estimate the relative and absolute vocabulary size of bilinguals: An exploratory study of children and adolescents 利用语义动词流畅性估算双语者的相对和绝对词汇量:一项针对儿童和青少年的探索性研究。
IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-07-07 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2024.106450
Daphnée Dubé , Elin Thordardottir

Introduction

The full assessment of bilingual children often involves at least one language for which formal vocabulary tests are lacking and which the examiner does not speak. We examined, in a sample of children with typical development (TD), whether a semantic verbal fluency task, typically used in research as a measure of executive function, could be used in the place of a formal vocabulary test to estimate vocabulary knowledge when formal tests are not available.

Method

113 TD monolingual French speakers and TD bilinguals and with varying degrees of exposure to French, age 6 to 17 years, completed tests of vocabulary knowledge and semantic verbal fluency. A subset of 64 participants spoke French and English and were tested in both languages. Verbal fluency measures calculated using a traditional method which uses specific rules for superordinate categories and for animals of different sex and age and a simplified scoring method which simply counts all words produced, included the total number of words produced in each language, Total Vocabulary and Conceptual Vocabulary measures combining both languages, as well as analyses of lexical composition and word frequency within the study sample.

Results

Linear regressions revealed that the number of words produced predicted vocabulary size in a language-specific way, with slightly stronger predictions made by the simplified scoring method. As expected, bilinguals produced more words and more unique words in their language of greater exposure, while different exposure groups were equivalent in measures combining both languages, including their Total vocabulary and Conceptual vocabulary. Producing unusual words (infrequently produced in the study sample) indicated higher vocabulary scores.

Conclusions

This study supports the use of the verbal fluency task as a quick and simple tool to obtain a rough estimate of vocabulary size in TD monolinguals and bilinguals. This tool shows promise as well in clinical work with other populations, subject to further verification.

导言:对双语儿童进行全面评估时,往往会涉及至少一种语言,而这种语言缺乏正规的词汇测试,且测试者不会说这种语言。我们以典型发育(TD)儿童为样本,研究了在没有正式词汇测试的情况下,是否可以用语义言语流利性任务代替正式词汇测试来评估词汇知识,语义言语流利性任务通常在研究中被用来衡量执行功能。64名受试者中的一个子集会说法语和英语,他们同时接受了两种语言的测试。语言流利程度的计算方法有两种:一种是采用传统方法(该方法对上位类别以及不同性别和年龄的动物采用特定规则),另一种是采用简化计分方法(该方法只计算所产生的所有单词),包括每种语言所产生的单词总数、两种语言的总词汇量和概念词汇量,以及对研究样本中的词汇构成和单词频率进行的分析。正如预期的那样,双语者在其接触较多的语言中产生了更多的单词和更独特的单词,而不同的接触组在两种语言的综合测量中,包括总词汇量和概念词汇量,都是相当的。本研究支持将言语流利性任务作为一种快速、简单的工具,用于粗略估计 TD 单语和双语者的词汇量。该工具在其他人群的临床工作中也有应用前景,有待进一步验证。
{"title":"Using semantic verbal fluency to estimate the relative and absolute vocabulary size of bilinguals: An exploratory study of children and adolescents","authors":"Daphnée Dubé ,&nbsp;Elin Thordardottir","doi":"10.1016/j.jcomdis.2024.106450","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jcomdis.2024.106450","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>The full assessment of bilingual children often involves at least one language for which formal vocabulary tests are lacking and which the examiner does not speak. We examined, in a sample of children with typical development (TD), whether a semantic verbal fluency task, typically used in research as a measure of executive function, could be used in the place of a formal vocabulary test to estimate vocabulary knowledge when formal tests are not available.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>113 TD monolingual French speakers and TD bilinguals and with varying degrees of exposure to French, age 6 to 17 years, completed tests of vocabulary knowledge and semantic verbal fluency. A subset of 64 participants spoke French and English and were tested in both languages. Verbal fluency measures calculated using a traditional method which uses specific rules for superordinate categories and for animals of different sex and age and a simplified scoring method which simply counts all words produced, included the total number of words produced in each language, Total Vocabulary and Conceptual Vocabulary measures combining both languages, as well as analyses of lexical composition and word frequency within the study sample.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Linear regressions revealed that the number of words produced predicted vocabulary size in a language-specific way, with slightly stronger predictions made by the simplified scoring method. As expected, bilinguals produced more words and more unique words in their language of greater exposure, while different exposure groups were equivalent in measures combining both languages, including their Total vocabulary and Conceptual vocabulary. Producing unusual words (infrequently produced in the study sample) indicated higher vocabulary scores.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This study supports the use of the verbal fluency task as a quick and simple tool to obtain a rough estimate of vocabulary size in TD monolinguals and bilinguals. This tool shows promise as well in clinical work with other populations, subject to further verification.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49175,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Communication Disorders","volume":"111 ","pages":"Article 106450"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2024-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141691659","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The role of speech-language pathologists in supporting theory of mind through literacy-based activities 语言病理学家在通过识字活动支持思维理论方面的作用。
IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-06-27 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2024.106449
Kristen Secora

Purpose

This tutorial discusses the importance of speech-language pathologists (SLPs) supporting individuals with language disorders in their understanding of others’ cognitive and affective states (theory of mind, ToM), with a special consideration given to applying these suggestions with individuals who are neurodivergent.

Method

I motivate this tutorial by first reviewing the literature related to ToM and language abilities for various populations of individuals with language difficulties, highlighting the need for explicitly targeting the language-related skills that are thought to underlie ToM for individuals with language disorders. I next present concrete examples of how to support ToM through literacy-based activities. I follow this discussion with a short description of how these activities may be applied with individuals who are neurodivergent through concrete examples, such as how inclusion of neurodivergent characters in storybooks can aid in educating children about understanding others’ perspectives. It further emphasizes the importance of discussing various types of mental and emotional states for individuals who share as well as differ in their neurotypes.

Conclusions

Language skills are an integral part of ToM abilities. SLPs play an important role in supporting clients’ academic, literacy, and social outcomes and can support important perspective-taking skills through associated language/communication skills. The various skills that fall under the umbrella term ‘theory of mind’ can be appropriately incorporated into intervention and literacy-based tasks in a way that respects differences in neurotype while still building important language and communication skills for clients.

目的:本教程讨论了语言病理学家(SLPs)支持语言障碍患者理解他人认知和情感状态(心智理论,ToM)的重要性,并特别考虑了将这些建议应用于神经变异患者的问题:首先,我回顾了与 ToM 和各种语言障碍人群的语言能力相关的文献,强调了明确针对语言障碍患者 ToM 的语言相关技能的必要性,从而激发本教程的编写动机。接下来,我将举例说明如何通过识字活动支持 ToM。在讨论之后,我简要介绍了如何通过具体实例将这些活动应用于神经变异者,例如如何在故事书中加入神经变异人物,以帮助教育儿童理解他人的观点。它进一步强调了讨论神经类型相同或不同的人的各种心理和情绪状态的重要性:语言技能是 ToM 能力不可分割的一部分。语言促进者在支持服务对象的学业、读写能力和社交成果方面发挥着重要作用,并可通过相关的语言/沟通技能来支持重要的透视能力。属于 "心智理论 "这一总括术语的各种技能可以适当地纳入干预和基于读写能力的任务中,其方式既要尊重神经类型的差异,又要为客户培养重要的语言和沟通技能。
{"title":"The role of speech-language pathologists in supporting theory of mind through literacy-based activities","authors":"Kristen Secora","doi":"10.1016/j.jcomdis.2024.106449","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jcomdis.2024.106449","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>This tutorial discusses the importance of speech-language pathologists (SLPs) supporting individuals with language disorders in their understanding of others’ cognitive and affective states (theory of mind, ToM), with a special consideration given to applying these suggestions with individuals who are neurodivergent.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>I motivate this tutorial by first reviewing the literature related to ToM and language abilities for various populations of individuals with language difficulties, highlighting the need for explicitly targeting the language-related skills that are thought to underlie ToM for individuals with language disorders. I next present concrete examples of how to support ToM through literacy-based activities. I follow this discussion with a short description of how these activities may be applied with individuals who are neurodivergent through concrete examples, such as how inclusion of neurodivergent characters in storybooks can aid in educating children about understanding others’ perspectives. It further emphasizes the importance of discussing various types of mental and emotional states for individuals who share as well as differ in their neurotypes.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Language skills are an integral part of ToM abilities. SLPs play an important role in supporting clients’ academic, literacy, and social outcomes and can support important perspective-taking skills through associated language/communication skills. The various skills that fall under the umbrella term ‘theory of mind’ can be appropriately incorporated into intervention and literacy-based tasks in a way that respects differences in neurotype while still building important language and communication skills for clients.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49175,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Communication Disorders","volume":"111 ","pages":"Article 106449"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2024-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141471831","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of Communication Disorders
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1