Pub Date : 2023-01-01DOI: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2022.106295
Erik X. Raj , Derek E. Daniels , Paula E. Thomson
Introduction
Online support group experiences, using social networking websites like Facebook, have shown much promise in past research unrelated to stuttering. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the utility of a Facebook-based stuttering support group that was created as an extension of and supplement to an in-person stuttering support group as a means of providing psychosocial support for people who stutter (PWS).
Method
A qualitative approach that was inspired by ethnography was used to explore the experiences of seven participants (six participants who stutter and one participant who does not stutter) who digitally connect on a private Facebook-based stuttering support group that was created as an extension of and supplement to an already existing in-person stuttering support group. The main question posed to the participants related to describing their experiences being a member of the Facebook-based stuttering support group.
Results
Data analysis revealed two major themes, which included the benefits and challenges of participating in a Facebook-based stuttering support group. Each major theme contained five subthemes. Specific results are discussed with reference to past research, as well as implications for practice and recommendations for future research.
Conclusions
There are numerous benefits and challenges associated with being a member of a Facebook-based stuttering support group. However, the overall utility of a Facebook-based stuttering support group, used in tandem with an in-person stuttering support experience, seems to provide members with a useful and impactful way to gain psychosocial support from other PWS.
{"title":"Facebook groups for people who stutter: An extension of and supplement to in-person support groups","authors":"Erik X. Raj , Derek E. Daniels , Paula E. Thomson","doi":"10.1016/j.jcomdis.2022.106295","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jcomdis.2022.106295","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Online support group experiences, using social networking websites like Facebook, have shown much promise in past research unrelated to stuttering. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the utility of a Facebook-based stuttering support group that was created as an extension of and supplement to an in-person stuttering support group as a means of providing psychosocial support for people who stutter (PWS).</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>A qualitative approach that was inspired by ethnography was used to explore the experiences of seven participants (six participants who stutter and one participant who does not stutter) who digitally connect on a private Facebook-based stuttering support group that was created as an extension of and supplement to an already existing in-person stuttering support group. The main question posed to the participants related to describing their experiences being a member of the Facebook-based stuttering support group.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Data analysis revealed two major themes, which included the benefits and challenges of participating in a Facebook-based stuttering support group. Each major theme contained five subthemes. Specific results are discussed with reference to past research, as well as implications for practice and recommendations for future research.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>There are numerous benefits and challenges associated with being a member of a Facebook-based stuttering support group. However, the overall utility of a Facebook-based stuttering support group, used in tandem with an in-person stuttering support experience, seems to provide members with a useful and impactful way to gain psychosocial support from other PWS.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49175,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Communication Disorders","volume":"101 ","pages":"Article 106295"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9231846","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-01-01DOI: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2022.106296
Fiona J. Mand, Laura W. Plexico, Stephen A. Erath, Megan-Brette Hamilton
Introduction
The purpose of this study was to measure and determine the factors that influence counseling self-efficacy in speech-language pathologists.
Methods
Data was collected through an anonymous 95-question web-based survey. Five hundred and twenty-seven completed responses were received.
Results
The results indicated that participants in the study were confident in their counseling abilities and skills; however, lesser confidence in skills related to personal adjustment counseling were observed. Further, emotional intelligence, internal locus of control, counseling training, and years of experience were positively related to counseling self-efficacy.
Conclusions
Speech-language pathologists may increase their counseling self-efficacy through increased training opportunities and experiences, development of greater emotional intelligence, and by having an internal locus of control.
{"title":"Speech-language pathologists’ counselor self-efficacy","authors":"Fiona J. Mand, Laura W. Plexico, Stephen A. Erath, Megan-Brette Hamilton","doi":"10.1016/j.jcomdis.2022.106296","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jcomdis.2022.106296","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>The purpose of this study was to measure and determine the factors that influence counseling self-efficacy in speech-language pathologists.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Data was collected through an anonymous 95-question web-based survey. Five hundred and twenty-seven completed responses were received.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The results indicated that participants in the study were confident in their counseling abilities and skills; however, lesser confidence in skills related to personal adjustment counseling were observed. Further, emotional intelligence, internal locus of control, counseling training, and years of experience were positively related to counseling self-efficacy.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Speech-language pathologists may increase their counseling self-efficacy through increased training opportunities and experiences, development of greater emotional intelligence, and by having an internal locus of control.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49175,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Communication Disorders","volume":"101 ","pages":"Article 106296"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9225285","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-01-01DOI: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2022.106281
Alicia G. Escobedo , John F. Gallagher , Irina Potapova , Giang Pham , Sonja Pruitt-Lord
Purpose
Percent grammatical utterances (PGU) provides clinicians and researchers with meaningful information on young children's grammatical abilities (Eisenberg & Guo, 2016). However, work is still needed to place PGU within the context of conventional language sample measures and understand how PGU reflects grammatical development in bilingual populations. The current study focuses on Spanish-English bilingual preschoolers to examine: 1) change in Spanish and English PGU over one year of preschool English instruction, 2) associations between PGU and other language sample measures within each language and across time, and 3) the types and frequency of error patterns in each language.
Method
Play-based language samples were elicited in English and Spanish from bilingual children (n = 19) at the beginning and end of an instructional preschool year in English. PGU was derived from each sample along with other language sample measures (e.g., mean length of utterance). We examined change in PGU from Time 1 to Time 2, and correlations between Time 1 PGU and Time 2 PGU for each language. Specific grammatical errors were described in terms of their frequency in each language and stability across time.
Results
Average English PGU increased from Time 1 to Time 2, and correlated with other language sample measures. Conversely, average Spanish PGU did not increase from Time 1 to Time 2, nor did PGU correlate with any other Spanish measure. Error patterns in each language reflected grammatical differences across English and Spanish.
Conclusions
Our results revealed distinct developmental patterns in bilingual children's first and second languages. Associations between time points and measures in English contrasted with disassociations in Spanish. Error patterns revealed more detailed information as to how bilingual children begin to acquire grammatical structures in each of their languages. We provide a case example to illustrate how grammaticality and error patterns can be used to characterize children's language abilities. We conclude with clinical implications of grammaticality in Spanish-English bilingual children.
{"title":"Understanding (un)grammaticality in context: Evidence from young Spanish-English bilinguals over time","authors":"Alicia G. Escobedo , John F. Gallagher , Irina Potapova , Giang Pham , Sonja Pruitt-Lord","doi":"10.1016/j.jcomdis.2022.106281","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jcomdis.2022.106281","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Percent grammatical utterances (PGU) provides clinicians and researchers with meaningful information on young children's grammatical abilities (Eisenberg & Guo, 2016). However, work is still needed to place PGU within the context of conventional language sample measures and understand how PGU reflects grammatical development in bilingual populations. The current study focuses on Spanish-English bilingual preschoolers to examine: 1) change in Spanish and English PGU over one year of preschool English instruction, 2) associations between PGU and other language sample measures within each language and across time, and 3) the types and frequency of error patterns in each language.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>Play-based language samples were elicited in English and Spanish from bilingual children (<em>n</em> = 19) at the beginning and end of an instructional preschool year in English. PGU was derived from each sample along with other language sample measures (e.g., mean length of utterance). We examined change in PGU from Time 1 to Time 2, and correlations between Time 1 PGU and Time 2 PGU for each language. Specific grammatical errors were described in terms of their frequency in each language and stability across time<strong>.</strong></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Average English PGU increased from Time 1 to Time 2, and correlated with other language sample measures. Conversely, average Spanish PGU did not increase from Time 1 to Time 2, nor did PGU correlate with any other Spanish measure. Error patterns in each language reflected grammatical differences across English and Spanish.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Our results revealed distinct developmental patterns in bilingual children's first and second languages. Associations between time points and measures in English contrasted with disassociations in Spanish. Error patterns revealed more detailed information as to how bilingual children begin to acquire grammatical structures in each of their languages. We provide a case example to illustrate how grammaticality and error patterns can be used to characterize children's language abilities. We conclude with clinical implications of grammaticality in Spanish-English bilingual children.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49175,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Communication Disorders","volume":"101 ","pages":"Article 106281"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10328429/pdf/nihms-1899436.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9752977","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-01-01DOI: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2022.106290
Balaji Rangarathnam , Towino Paramby , Gary H. McCullough , Hylan Pickett , Özlem E. Tulunay-Ugur , Richard I. Zraick
Objective
The purpose of the study was to investigate the effects of flow phonation voice therapy on laryngeal physiology and vocal quality in persons with primary Muscle Tension Dysphonia (MTD1).
Methods
Seventeen participants with a diagnosis of MTD1 completed the study. Participants were randomized to two groups. Group 1 (9 participants) received flow phonation treatment and individualized vocal hygiene education for 12 sessions over six weeks. Group 2 (8 participants) received vocal hygiene education only for three weeks (6 sessions), followed by another three weeks (6 sessions) of both vocal hygiene instruction and flow phonation therapy. Treatment consisted of cup-bubble blowing, gargling, and stretch and flow exercises. Visual-perceptual. auditory-perceptual, acoustic, aerodynamic and voice-related quality-of-life measures were obtained at three time points: before treatment, three weeks after initiation of treatment and after completion of treatment.
Results
Voice quality was perceived to be significantly improved in both groups. Voice related quality-of-life trended toward improvement for both groups across time points. Changes in aerodynamic and acoustic measures did not reach statistical significance compared to baseline for both groups. Visual comparisons of laryngeal closure patterns demonstrated comparably better outcomes for Group 1.
Conclusions
Results of this study indicate flow phonation exercises can potentially be favorably employed for individuals with MTD1. In particular, it appears that the exercises aid in alleviating vocal hyperfunction, as evidenced by visual perceptual stroboscopic analysis, and clinically improved auditory-perceptual measures.
{"title":"A randomized controlled trial of the effects of flow phonation voice treatment for primary muscle tension dysphonia","authors":"Balaji Rangarathnam , Towino Paramby , Gary H. McCullough , Hylan Pickett , Özlem E. Tulunay-Ugur , Richard I. Zraick","doi":"10.1016/j.jcomdis.2022.106290","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jcomdis.2022.106290","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The purpose of the study was to investigate the effects of flow phonation voice therapy on laryngeal physiology and vocal quality in persons with primary Muscle Tension Dysphonia (MTD1).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Seventeen participants with a diagnosis of MTD1 completed the study. Participants were randomized to two groups. Group 1 (9 participants) received flow phonation treatment and individualized vocal hygiene education for 12 sessions over six weeks. Group 2 (8 participants) received vocal hygiene education only for three weeks (6 sessions), followed by another three weeks (6 sessions) of both vocal hygiene instruction and flow phonation therapy. Treatment consisted of cup-bubble blowing, gargling, and stretch and flow exercises. Visual-perceptual. auditory-perceptual, acoustic, aerodynamic and voice-related quality-of-life measures were obtained at three time points: before treatment, three weeks after initiation of treatment and after completion of treatment.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Voice quality was perceived to be significantly improved in both groups. Voice related quality-of-life trended toward improvement for both groups across time points. Changes in aerodynamic and acoustic measures did not reach statistical significance compared to baseline for both groups. Visual comparisons of laryngeal closure patterns demonstrated comparably better outcomes for Group 1.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Results of this study indicate flow phonation exercises can potentially be favorably employed for individuals with MTD1. In particular, it appears that the exercises aid in alleviating vocal hyperfunction, as evidenced by visual perceptual stroboscopic analysis, and clinically improved auditory-perceptual measures.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49175,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Communication Disorders","volume":"101 ","pages":"Article 106290"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9905289/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9585083","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-01-01DOI: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2022.106298
Carola de Beer , Isabell Wartenburger , Clara Huttenlauch , Sandra Hanne
<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Prosody serves central functions in language processing including linguistic functions (linguistic prosody), like structuring the speech signal. Impairments in production and comprehension of linguistic prosody have been described for persons with unilateral right (RHDP) or left hemisphere damage (LHDP). However, reported results differ with respect to the characteristics and severities of these impairments</p></div><div><h3>Aims</h3><p>We conducted a systematic literature review focusing on production and comprehension of linguistic prosody at the prosody-syntax interface (i.e., phrase or sentence level) in LHDP and RHDP.</p></div><div><h3>Methods & Procedures</h3><p>In a systematic literature search we included: (i) empirical studies with (ii) adult RHDP and/or LHDP (iii) investigating production and/or comprehension of linguistic prosody at the (iv) phrase or sentence level (v) reporting quantitative data on prosodic measures. We excluded overview papers; studies involving participants with dysarthria, apraxia of speech, foreign accent syndrome, psychiatric diseases, and/or neurodegenerative diseases; studies focusing primarily on emotional prosody; and on lexical stress / word level; studies of which no full text was available and/or that were published in a language other than English. We searched the databases BIOSIS, MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed, Web of Science, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, PSYNDEX, PsycINFO and speechBITE, last searched on January 13<sup>th</sup> 2022.We found 2,631 studies without duplicates. We identified 43 studies which were included into our systematic review. For data extraction and synthesis of results, we grouped studies by (i) modality (production vs. comprehension), (ii) function (syntactic structure vs. information structure), and (iii) by experiment task. For production studies, outcome measures were defined as the productive use of the different prosodic cues (lengthening, pause, f0, amplitude). For comprehension studies, performance measures (accuracy and reaction times) were defined as outcome measures. In accordance with the PRISMA 2020 statement (<span>Page et al., 2021</span>), we conducted a quality check to assess study risk of bias. Our review was pre-registered with PROSPERO (CRD42019120308).</p></div><div><h3>Outcomes & Results</h3><p>Of the 43 studies reviewed, 30 studies involved RHDP (<em>n</em> = 309), assessing production in 15 studies and focusing on comprehension of prosody in 16 studies (one study investigated production <em>and</em> comprehension). LHDP (<em>n</em> = 438) were included in 35 studies of which 15 studied production and 21 evaluated comprehension of prosody (one study investigated production <em>and</em> comprehension). Despite the heterogeneity of results in the studies reviewed, our synthesis of results suggests that both LHDP and RHDP show limitations, but no complete impairment, in their production and/or comprehension of linguistic prosody. Pros
背景韵律在语言处理中起着核心作用,包括语言功能(语言韵律),如构建语音信号。单侧右半球损伤(RHDP)或左半球损伤(LHDP)的人在语言韵律的产生和理解方面受到了损害。然而,报道的结果在这些影响的特征和严重程度方面有所不同。目的我们进行了一项系统的文献综述,重点关注LHDP和RHDP在韵律-句法界面(即短语或句子层面)上对语言韵律的产生和理解;程序在系统的文献检索中,我们包括:(i)对(ii)成人RHDP和/或LHDP的实证研究;(iii)调查语言韵律的产生和/或理解;(iv)短语或句子水平;(v)报告韵律测量的定量数据。我们排除了概述文件;涉及患有构音障碍、言语失用症、外国口音综合征、精神疾病和/或神经退行性疾病的参与者的研究;主要关注情绪韵律的研究;在词汇重音/词汇层面;没有全文和/或以英语以外的语言发表的研究。我们搜索了数据库BIOSIS、MEDLINE、EMBASE、PubMed、Web of Science、CINAHL、Cochrane Library、PSYNDEX、PsycINFO和speechBITE,最后一次搜索是在2022年1月13日。我们发现2631项研究没有重复。我们确定了43项研究,这些研究被纳入我们的系统综述。对于数据提取和结果合成,我们按(i)模态(产生与理解)、(ii)功能(句法结构与信息结构)和(iii)实验任务对研究进行分组。对于生产性研究,结果测量被定义为不同韵律线索(延长、停顿、f0、幅度)的生产性使用。对于理解研究,表现测量(准确性和反应时间)被定义为结果测量。根据PRISMA 2020声明(Page等人,2021),我们进行了质量检查,以评估研究的偏倚风险。我们的审查已在PROSPERO预先注册(CRD42019120308);结果在回顾的43项研究中,30项研究涉及RHDP(n=309),15项研究评估产出,16项研究关注韵律理解(一项研究调查产出和理解)。LHDP(n=438)被纳入35项研究,其中15项研究生产,21项评估韵律理解(一项研究调查生产和理解)。尽管综述的研究结果存在异质性,但我们对结果的综合表明,LHDP和RHDP在语言韵律的产生和/或理解方面都表现出局限性,但没有完全受损。韵律的局限性在处理语言韵律的不同领域都很明显,比如句法歧义消除或句子类型之间的区别。与RHDP相比,LHDP有更严重局限性的趋势。结论我们只将已发表的研究纳入我们的综述,没有对报告偏差的风险进行评估,也没有对结果进行系统的确定性评估。尽管存在这些局限性,我们得出的结论是,这两组人在语言韵律的产生和理解方面都存在缺陷,但LHDP和RHDP在韵律处理方面都没有完全受损。这表明韵律是LHDP和RHDP的相关交流资源,值得在言语语言治疗中加以解决。
{"title":"A systematic review on production and comprehension of linguistic prosody in people with acquired language and communication disorders resulting from unilateral brain lesions","authors":"Carola de Beer , Isabell Wartenburger , Clara Huttenlauch , Sandra Hanne","doi":"10.1016/j.jcomdis.2022.106298","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jcomdis.2022.106298","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Prosody serves central functions in language processing including linguistic functions (linguistic prosody), like structuring the speech signal. Impairments in production and comprehension of linguistic prosody have been described for persons with unilateral right (RHDP) or left hemisphere damage (LHDP). However, reported results differ with respect to the characteristics and severities of these impairments</p></div><div><h3>Aims</h3><p>We conducted a systematic literature review focusing on production and comprehension of linguistic prosody at the prosody-syntax interface (i.e., phrase or sentence level) in LHDP and RHDP.</p></div><div><h3>Methods & Procedures</h3><p>In a systematic literature search we included: (i) empirical studies with (ii) adult RHDP and/or LHDP (iii) investigating production and/or comprehension of linguistic prosody at the (iv) phrase or sentence level (v) reporting quantitative data on prosodic measures. We excluded overview papers; studies involving participants with dysarthria, apraxia of speech, foreign accent syndrome, psychiatric diseases, and/or neurodegenerative diseases; studies focusing primarily on emotional prosody; and on lexical stress / word level; studies of which no full text was available and/or that were published in a language other than English. We searched the databases BIOSIS, MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed, Web of Science, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, PSYNDEX, PsycINFO and speechBITE, last searched on January 13<sup>th</sup> 2022.We found 2,631 studies without duplicates. We identified 43 studies which were included into our systematic review. For data extraction and synthesis of results, we grouped studies by (i) modality (production vs. comprehension), (ii) function (syntactic structure vs. information structure), and (iii) by experiment task. For production studies, outcome measures were defined as the productive use of the different prosodic cues (lengthening, pause, f0, amplitude). For comprehension studies, performance measures (accuracy and reaction times) were defined as outcome measures. In accordance with the PRISMA 2020 statement (<span>Page et al., 2021</span>), we conducted a quality check to assess study risk of bias. Our review was pre-registered with PROSPERO (CRD42019120308).</p></div><div><h3>Outcomes & Results</h3><p>Of the 43 studies reviewed, 30 studies involved RHDP (<em>n</em> = 309), assessing production in 15 studies and focusing on comprehension of prosody in 16 studies (one study investigated production <em>and</em> comprehension). LHDP (<em>n</em> = 438) were included in 35 studies of which 15 studied production and 21 evaluated comprehension of prosody (one study investigated production <em>and</em> comprehension). Despite the heterogeneity of results in the studies reviewed, our synthesis of results suggests that both LHDP and RHDP show limitations, but no complete impairment, in their production and/or comprehension of linguistic prosody. Pros","PeriodicalId":49175,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Communication Disorders","volume":"101 ","pages":"Article 106298"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9233044","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-01-01DOI: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2022.106297
Giang Pham , Andrew Simpson , Khanh Nguyen
Introduction
One way to identify Developmental Language Disorder (DLD) is to establish clinical markers in a language to serve as reliable indicators of the disorder. This study embarks on the search for clinical markers for Vietnamese using longitudinal data from children with and without DLD.
Methods
We matched ten children previously classified with DLD to ten with typical development (TD) by age and gender. Participants completed a story generation task at three time points: kindergarten, first, and second grade. Overall grammatical development was measured using mean length of utterance, MLU, and proportion of grammatical utterances, PGU. We examined a language-specific feature, classifiers, in terms of accuracy (omission errors), diversity (number of different classifiers), and productivity, or the use of classifiers in constructions of two-to-three elements (classifier+noun, numeral+classifier+noun). Longitudinal change and group differences were examined using linear mixed modeling, supplemented by linguistic analysis.
Results
Both groups increased in MLU and PGU over time. The DLD group performed lower in kindergarten and continued to show lower performance over time on these measures. Classifier omission errors decreased over time with no group differences. Classifier diversity increased across groups, with lower performance by the DLD group in kindergarten and over time. For classifier productivity, TD children used classifiers in multiple constructions in kindergarten and maintained the same level over time. In contrast, children with DLD had minimal use of three-element constructions in kindergarten but increased in productivity over time.
Conclusions
Children with DLD produce shorter utterances with relatively more grammatical errors compared to their TD peers in the early school years. Though no longer committing classifier omission errors, children with DLD showed more restricted use of classifiers in terms of the number of different classifiers and constructions produced. Findings inform the search for Vietnamese clinical markers of DLD.
{"title":"Vietnamese children with and without DLD: Classifier use and grammaticality over time","authors":"Giang Pham , Andrew Simpson , Khanh Nguyen","doi":"10.1016/j.jcomdis.2022.106297","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jcomdis.2022.106297","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>One way to identify Developmental Language Disorder (DLD) is to establish clinical markers in a language to serve as reliable indicators of the disorder. This study embarks on the search for clinical markers for Vietnamese using longitudinal data from children with and without DLD.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We matched ten children previously classified with DLD to ten with typical development (TD) by age and gender. Participants completed a story generation task at three time points: kindergarten, first, and second grade. Overall grammatical development was measured using mean length of utterance, MLU, and proportion of grammatical utterances, PGU. We examined a language-specific feature, classifiers, in terms of accuracy (omission errors), diversity (number of different classifiers), and productivity, or the use of classifiers in constructions of two-to-three elements (classifier+noun, numeral+classifier+noun). Longitudinal change and group differences were examined using linear mixed modeling, supplemented by linguistic analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Both groups increased in MLU and PGU over time. The DLD group performed lower in kindergarten and continued to show lower performance over time on these measures. Classifier omission errors decreased over time with no group differences. Classifier diversity increased across groups, with lower performance by the DLD group in kindergarten and over time. For classifier productivity, TD children used classifiers in multiple constructions in kindergarten and maintained the same level over time. In contrast, children with DLD had minimal use of three-element constructions in kindergarten but increased in productivity over time.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Children with DLD produce shorter utterances with relatively more grammatical errors compared to their TD peers in the early school years. Though no longer committing classifier omission errors, children with DLD showed more restricted use of classifiers in terms of the number of different classifiers and constructions produced. Findings inform the search for Vietnamese clinical markers of DLD.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49175,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Communication Disorders","volume":"101 ","pages":"Article 106297"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10162499/pdf/nihms-1896146.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9418417","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-01-01DOI: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2022.106292
Thomas B. Tienkamp , Rob J.J.H. van Son , Bence Mark Halpern
Introduction
Surgical treatment for oral cancer leads to lasting changes of the vocal tract and individuals treated for oral cancer (ITOC) often experience speech problems. The purpose of this study was to analyse the acoustic properties of the spontaneous speech of individuals who were surgically treated for oral cancer. It was investigated (1) how key spectral measures of articulation change post-treatment; (2) whether changes are more related to target manner or place of articulation; and (3) how spectral measures develop at various time points following treatment.
Method
A corpus consisting of 32.850 tokens was constructed by manually segmenting the speech of five (four female - one male) American English speaking ITOC. General acoustic characteristics (duration and spectral tilt), plosives (burst frequency), fricatives (centre of gravity and spectral skewness), and vowels (F1 and F2) were analysed using linear mixed effects regression and compared to control speech. Moreover, a within speaker analysis was performed for speakers with multiple recordings.
Results
Manner of articulation is more predictive of post-treatment changes than place of articulation. Compared to controls, ITOC produced the fricatives /f, v, θ, ð, s, z, ʃ, ʒ/ with a lower centre of gravity while no differences were found for plosives and vowels. Longitudinal analyses show high within-speaker variation, but general improvements one-year post-treatment.
Conclusions
Surgical oral cancer treatment changes the spectral properties of speech. Fricatives with varying manner of articulations were distorted, suggesting that manner of articulation is more predictive than place of articulation in identifying general problem areas for ITOC.
{"title":"Objective speech outcomes after surgical treatment for oral cancer: An acoustic analysis of a spontaneous speech corpus containing 32.850 tokens","authors":"Thomas B. Tienkamp , Rob J.J.H. van Son , Bence Mark Halpern","doi":"10.1016/j.jcomdis.2022.106292","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jcomdis.2022.106292","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Surgical treatment for oral cancer leads to lasting changes of the vocal tract and individuals treated for oral cancer (ITOC) often experience speech problems. The purpose of this study was to analyse the acoustic properties of the spontaneous speech of individuals who were surgically treated for oral cancer. It was investigated (1) how key spectral measures of articulation change post-treatment; (2) whether changes are more related to target manner or place of articulation; and (3) how spectral measures develop at various time points following treatment.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>A corpus consisting of 32.850 tokens was constructed by manually segmenting the speech of five (four female - one male) American English speaking ITOC. General acoustic characteristics (duration and spectral tilt), plosives (burst frequency), fricatives (centre of gravity and spectral skewness), and vowels (F1 and F2) were analysed using linear mixed effects regression and compared to control speech. Moreover, a within speaker analysis was performed for speakers with multiple recordings.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Manner of articulation is more predictive of post-treatment changes than place of articulation. Compared to controls, ITOC produced the fricatives /f, v, θ, ð, s, z, ʃ, ʒ/ with a lower centre of gravity while no differences were found for plosives and vowels. Longitudinal analyses show high within-speaker variation, but general improvements one-year post-treatment.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Surgical oral cancer treatment changes the spectral properties of speech. Fricatives with varying manner of articulations were distorted, suggesting that manner of articulation is more predictive than place of articulation in identifying general problem areas for ITOC.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49175,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Communication Disorders","volume":"101 ","pages":"Article 106292"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9600286","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-01-01DOI: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2022.106300
King Chung
Calibration is an essential component of audiology practice to ensure the accuracy of the equipment for audiometric tests and the transferability of test results across different clinics and countries. The ability to check the accuracy of the equipment and the ambient noise levels allows clinicians to monitor the functions of their equipment, to reduce noise distractors in the testing environment, and to have confidence in their test results, especially in humanitarian or field test settings. Sound level meters are the primary instruments to measure the sound pressure levels of the transducers and the test rooms used for audiometric testing. The International Electrotechnical Commission released a 3-part IEC 61672 standard of the specifications of sound level meters in 2013, and it is adopted by the standards organizations of many countries. This first installment of the tutorial series references this international standard and discusses basic acoustics concepts, calibration principles, and key functions of sound level meters in the application of audiometric calibration. Subsequent installments will discuss how to measure the ambient noise levels, how to determine whether a test room is suitable for testing hearing thresholds using different transducers, and how to determine whether different transducers of audiometers meet the national or international standards.
{"title":"Calibration matters: I. Sound level meter basics","authors":"King Chung","doi":"10.1016/j.jcomdis.2022.106300","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jcomdis.2022.106300","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Calibration is an essential component of audiology practice to ensure the accuracy of the equipment for audiometric tests and the transferability of test results across different clinics and countries. The ability to check the accuracy of the equipment and the ambient noise levels allows clinicians to monitor the functions of their equipment, to reduce noise distractors in the testing environment, and to have confidence in their test results, especially in humanitarian or field test settings. Sound level meters are the primary instruments to measure the sound pressure levels of the transducers and the test rooms used for audiometric testing. The International Electrotechnical Commission released a 3-part IEC 61672 standard of the specifications of sound level meters in 2013, and it is adopted by the standards organizations of many countries. This first installment of the tutorial series references this international standard and discusses basic acoustics concepts, calibration principles, and key functions of sound level meters in the application of audiometric calibration. Subsequent installments will discuss how to measure the ambient noise levels, how to determine whether a test room is suitable for testing hearing thresholds using different transducers, and how to determine whether different transducers of audiometers meet the national or international standards.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49175,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Communication Disorders","volume":"101 ","pages":"Article 106300"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9231851","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-01-01DOI: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2022.106293
King Chung
Ambient noise measurement is a part of audiometric calibration in which one measures the ambient noise level in a sound room/test area intended for audiometric testing and then decides whether the background noise in the test room meets the maximum permissible ambient noise level (MPANL) requirements specified in national or international standards, e.g., ANSI/ASA S3.1:1999(R2018) or ISO 8253–1:2010 (R2021). If the ambient noise levels are below the MPANLs, clinicians can be sure that the test stimuli they present to patients are not masked by the background noise in the test room/area and their test results are valid and the subsequent clinical decisions are sound. Audiometric testing, however, may not always be carried out in sound rooms/test areas with ambient noise levels below the MPANLs, especially during community outreach or humanitarian services. A thorough understanding on the MPANL requirements for different transducers can help clinicians determine which equipment is appropriate for the test area. This tutorial discusses the rationale and assumptions behind the MPANL specifications, how to measure ambient noise levels of test rooms/areas, and how to apply the national and international standards to determine if the test room is suitable for audiometric testing. Alternative strategies are discussed when the ambient noise levels exceed the specified MPANLs. The rationale and procedures are explained using examples on how to lower the ambient noise levels in test areas, and how to determine the suitable test frequency range and the lowest threshold levels that can be assessed in the test area.
{"title":"Calibration matters: II. Measurement of ambient noise in test rooms/areas","authors":"King Chung","doi":"10.1016/j.jcomdis.2022.106293","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jcomdis.2022.106293","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Ambient noise measurement is a part of audiometric calibration in which one measures the ambient noise level in a sound room/test area intended for audiometric testing and then decides whether the background noise in the test room meets the maximum permissible ambient noise level (MPANL) requirements specified in national or international standards, e.g., ANSI/ASA S3.1:1999(R2018) or ISO 8253–1:2010 (R2021). If the ambient noise levels are below the MPANLs, clinicians can be sure that the test stimuli they present to patients are not masked by the background noise in the test room/area and their test results are valid and the subsequent clinical decisions are sound. Audiometric testing, however, may not always be carried out in sound rooms/test areas with ambient noise levels below the MPANLs, especially during community outreach or humanitarian services. A thorough understanding on the MPANL requirements for different transducers can help clinicians determine which equipment is appropriate for the test area. This tutorial discusses the rationale and assumptions behind the MPANL specifications, how to measure ambient noise levels of test rooms/areas, and how to apply the national and international standards to determine if the test room is suitable for audiometric testing. Alternative strategies are discussed when the ambient noise levels exceed the specified MPANLs. The rationale and procedures are explained using examples on how to lower the ambient noise levels in test areas, and how to determine the suitable test frequency range and the lowest threshold levels that can be assessed in the test area.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49175,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Communication Disorders","volume":"101 ","pages":"Article 106293"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9225267","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-11-01DOI: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2022.106268
Colleen B. Ward , Jennifer E. Mack
Introduction
We tested whether aphasia self-disclosure via an aphasia ID card impacts (1) how non-aphasic listeners initially process language produced by a speaker with aphasia and (2) learning of the speaker's error patterns over time.
Methods
In this eye-tracking experiment, 27 young adults followed instructions recorded by a speaker with nonfluent aphasia while viewing a target picture and a distractor. The Card group (n = 14) was shown a simulated aphasia ID card for the speaker and the No Card group (n = 13) was not. The task was divided into Pre-Observation and Post-Observation blocks. Between blocks, participants observed the speaker making semantic paraphasias. Eye-tracking analyses compared the time course of target advantage (reflecting competition from the distractor picture) and workspace advantage (reflecting attention to task) between groups and blocks.
Results
Pre-Observation, the Card group had a higher target advantage than the No Card group in the post-response window (i.e., after participants had responded), indicating sustained attention to the speaker's language. Across blocks, there was evidence that the Card group (but not the No Card group) learned that the speaker makes semantic paraphasias.
Conclusions
Aphasia ID cards impacted listeners’ processing of language produced by a speaker with nonfluent aphasia. Increased patience and attentiveness may underlie both the Card group's sustained attention to the speaker as well as learning of the speaker's error patterns. Further research should address whether these changes impact communication success between PWA and new conversation partners.
{"title":"The effect of an aphasia ID card on the processing of language produced by a speaker with nonfluent aphasia","authors":"Colleen B. Ward , Jennifer E. Mack","doi":"10.1016/j.jcomdis.2022.106268","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jcomdis.2022.106268","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>We tested whether aphasia self-disclosure via an aphasia ID card impacts (1) how non-aphasic listeners initially process language produced by a speaker with aphasia and (2) learning of the speaker's error patterns over time.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>In this eye-tracking experiment, 27 young adults followed instructions recorded by a speaker with nonfluent aphasia while viewing a target picture and a distractor. The Card group (n = 14) was shown a simulated aphasia ID card for the speaker and the No Card group (n = 13) was not. The task was divided into Pre-Observation and Post-Observation blocks. Between blocks, participants observed the speaker making semantic paraphasias. Eye-tracking analyses compared the time course of <em>target advantage</em> (reflecting competition from the distractor picture) and <em>workspace advantage</em> (reflecting attention to task) between groups and blocks.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Pre-Observation, the Card group had a higher target advantage than the No Card group in the post-response window (i.e., after participants had responded), indicating sustained attention to the speaker's language. Across blocks, there was evidence that the Card group (but not the No Card group) learned that the speaker makes semantic paraphasias.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Aphasia ID cards impacted listeners’ processing of language produced by a speaker with nonfluent aphasia. Increased patience and attentiveness may underlie both the Card group's sustained attention to the speaker as well as learning of the speaker's error patterns. Further research should address whether these changes impact communication success between PWA and new conversation partners.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49175,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Communication Disorders","volume":"100 ","pages":"Article 106268"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10469476","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}