The Netflix drama ‘Adolescence’ brought ‘the manosphere’ (a virtual space defined by misogynist views) and its potential dangers for teenage boys into the mainstream narrative. This paper describes parallels between toxic masculinity communities and other extremist groups. It considers why so many teenage boys may be attracted to the manosphere and why a developmental context is crucial to an informed response. The unique characteristics of ‘the teenage brain’ offer a framework to guide professionals working with young people who are exploring this type of content.
{"title":"Narrative Matters: Adolescence in The Manosphere – A perfect storm?","authors":"Jane Gilmour","doi":"10.1111/camh.70012","DOIUrl":"10.1111/camh.70012","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The Netflix drama ‘Adolescence’ brought ‘the manosphere’ (a virtual space defined by misogynist views) and its potential dangers for teenage boys into the mainstream narrative. This paper describes parallels between toxic masculinity communities and other extremist groups. It considers why so many teenage boys may be attracted to the manosphere and why a developmental context is crucial to an informed response. The unique characteristics of ‘the teenage brain’ offer a framework to guide professionals working with young people who are exploring this type of content.</p>","PeriodicalId":49291,"journal":{"name":"Child and Adolescent Mental Health","volume":"30 3","pages":"320-322"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0,"publicationDate":"2025-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://acamh.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/camh.70012","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144627541","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The concept of autism has undergone a significant transformation in recent decades, evolving from a narrowly defined, rare disorder into a broad and heterogeneous spectrum. This diagnostic expansion, while intended to improve recognition of diverse presentations, has led to a marked increase in prevalence and a dilution of autism's neurobiological distinctiveness. Two emerging trends may further contribute to this phenomenon: the rise in adult diagnoses without documented childhood traits, and the growing attribution of transdiagnostic social difficulties to subthreshold autistic traits. These trends risk conflating autism with general social dysfunction and undermining the validity of related clinical constructs. The diagnostic inflation of ASD may reflect a problematic overextension of criteria, compounded by the use of unstructured assessments and amplified by the growing influence of neurodiversity discourse. Moreover, it is facilitated by the absence of definitive neurobiological markers and remains at odds with autism's characterization as a neurodevelopmental condition with strong genetic roots. Whether this expansive reconceptualization constitutes progress or regression warrants deeper scientific debate.
{"title":"Debate: Are we over-pathologizing young people's mental health? The inflationary risk of autism diagnosis","authors":"Michele Poletti, Antonio Preti, Andrea Raballo","doi":"10.1111/camh.70013","DOIUrl":"10.1111/camh.70013","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The concept of autism has undergone a significant transformation in recent decades, evolving from a narrowly defined, rare disorder into a broad and heterogeneous spectrum. This diagnostic expansion, while intended to improve recognition of diverse presentations, has led to a marked increase in prevalence and a dilution of autism's neurobiological distinctiveness. Two emerging trends may further contribute to this phenomenon: the rise in adult diagnoses without documented childhood traits, and the growing attribution of transdiagnostic social difficulties to subthreshold autistic traits. These trends risk conflating autism with general social dysfunction and undermining the validity of related clinical constructs. The diagnostic inflation of ASD may reflect a problematic overextension of criteria, compounded by the use of unstructured assessments and amplified by the growing influence of neurodiversity discourse. Moreover, it is facilitated by the absence of definitive neurobiological markers and remains at odds with autism's characterization as a neurodevelopmental condition with strong genetic roots. Whether this expansive reconceptualization constitutes progress or regression warrants deeper scientific debate.</p>","PeriodicalId":49291,"journal":{"name":"Child and Adolescent Mental Health","volume":"30 3","pages":"303-304"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0,"publicationDate":"2025-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144621015","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Marinos Kyriakopoulos, Maria Papadaki, Aikaterini Zeza, Niki-Stavroula Panagiotopoulou
<p>Maria Papadaki</p><p>Understanding why some children exposed to adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) develop mental health difficulties while others remain resilient is important for designing effective preventive strategies. It has been suggested that the presence of a warm and supportive adult may protect against mental health difficulties in such cases by moderating the negative effects of early adversity. However, it remains unclear whether such an association is causal or whether it may be accounted for by genetic or environmental factors.</p><p>Stock et al. (2025) investigated this question using data from the Environmental Risk (E-Risk) Longitudinal Twin Study, a representative UK-based birth cohort of 2232 same-sex twins. ACEs were assessed prospectively covering the period from age 5 to age 12 years. Maternal warmth was evaluated at two timepoints, at ages 5 and 10 years, using structured speech samples from mothers. Adult support in children's lives was gathered through self-reports at age 12. Mental health outcomes were assessed at age 12 through interviews with parents and teachers and at 18 years through self-reports from the participants using p-factor as a standardized index.</p><p>Initial phenotypic analyses revealed that, among children exposed to ACEs, those who experienced greater maternal warmth and adult support had lower levels of emotional and behavioral problems in early adolescence, as well as lower p-factor scores at 18 years. However, when a monozygotic twin-difference analysis was applied, the strength of these associations was significantly reduced: by about 70% for maternal warmth and 81% for adult support. In twin pairs equally exposed to ACEs, the twin who experienced more maternal warmth and support from adults tended to have similar mental health outcomes to their co-twin.</p><p>The authors identified some limitations to their investigation, including the measurement of adult support through children's self-report, which may be affected by genetically influenced perception bias, the use of difference scores in the twin differences design, which may induce error in the measurement of protective factors, and the possible non-generalisability to singletons.</p><p>Nevertheless, this study suggests that the observed effects of the support by a warm and supportive adult in children experiencing ACEs are largely due to genetic and environmental confounding rather than independent causal effects, which highlights the need for multifaceted interventions. Efforts to improve children's mental health after adversity should not focus exclusively on strengthening adult–child relationships but should also address broader family risk factors and inherited vulnerabilities.</p><p>Stock, S.E., Lacey, R.E., Arseneault, L., Caspi, A., Crush, E., Danese, A., & Baldwin, J.R. (2025). Can a warm and supportive adult protect against mental health problems amongst children with experience of adversity? A twin-differences study. <i>J
这些结果支持在儿科护理机构进行更广泛的常规自杀风险筛查的呼吁,这可能会允许及时干预。作者发现了一些局限性,包括样本主要是白人,研究没有评估自杀企图,以及筛查的最高频率是每周一次。此外,由于没有对照组,因此不可能评估筛查是否降低或增加了自杀念头的风险。尽管如此,在低风险儿童中新的自杀意念率很低,在高风险参与者中没有升级,这强烈表明了安全性和潜在的益处。这项研究增加了大量证据,表明自杀风险筛查在青春期前是安全的,即使在很长一段时间内定期进行。研究结果支持扩大筛查项目和开发监测青少年心理健康的数字工具,特别是对那些可能从早期和持续关注中受益的高风险儿童。Hennefield, L., Luking, k.r., Tillman, R., Barch, d.m., Luby, j.l., Thompson, R.J.(2025)。询问有关自杀的问题与增加自杀念头无关。美国儿童与青少年精神病学学会杂志:S0890-8567(25)00178-9。doi: 10.1016 / j.jaac.2025.03.025。抗精神病药物被广泛使用,包括在怀孕期间,这引起了对后代潜在长期影响的担忧。虽然这些药物不被认为是致畸的,但它们对儿童神经发育的影响仍不确定。这一领域的研究受到限制,因为缺乏涉及孕妇的临床试验,而且很难将药物的影响与母亲精神疾病的影响和其他混杂因素区分开来。Kaplan等人(2025)进行了一项系统综述,以评估产前暴露于抗精神病药物(AP)是否与儿童不良的神经发育结局有关。他们确定了16项研究,6项队列研究和10项基于登记册的研究,发表到2024年9月。这些研究检查了运动、认知、行为、精神和学术方面的结果。研究质量采用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表进行评估,平均得分为7.1分(满分9分)。回顾发现,在调整了关键的混杂因素后,大多数研究没有报告暴露于ap和未暴露于ap的儿童之间的显著神经发育差异。大量基于人群的研究显示,ADHD、自闭症谱系障碍或其他神经发育障碍的风险没有增加。小规模的队列研究同样发现与认知或心理结果没有关联。早期运动或行为迟缓在短期随访期的研究中更常见,但这些影响在长期研究中并不持续。这表明这种早期缺陷可能是短暂的,可能与新生儿戒断或出生时停止接触AP后的暂时性神经发育影响有关。然而,母亲精神疾病对结果的影响仍然是一个关键的限制,特别是在缺乏适当对照组的研究中。解释这些发现需要仔细考虑混杂变量。患有严重精神疾病的母亲所生的孩子在发育方面面临的风险已经增加,这些风险可能与接触AP导致的结果重叠。包括精神病控制组在内的研究往往只报告了婴儿时期短暂的运动迟缓,在学习成绩或神经发育方面没有长期差异。其他混杂因素,如吸烟、药物使用、社会经济地位和母亲教育,在研究中没有得到一致的解决。在一些情况下,未调整分析中存在的关联在完全统计调整后消失。重要的是,对产妇精神疾病的药物治疗也可能提供保护作用。一项研究发现,母亲在怀孕期间继续接受AP治疗的孩子患ADHD的风险比停止治疗的孩子低。虽然关于抗精神病药物保护作用的研究有限,但抗抑郁药物研究的类似发现表明,有效的产妇治疗可能减轻发育风险。这突出了在评估妊娠期应用ap时,考虑潜在危害(包括代谢综合征和妊娠糖尿病)和对母亲和孩子的潜在益处的重要性。临床决策应个体化,并基于共同的风险-收益讨论。Kaplan CA, Poels EMP, van den Heuvel MI, Bijma HH, Bergink V, Rommel A-S, Robakis T,妊娠期抗精神病药物与儿童神经发育结局的系统评价,美国儿童学会杂志;青少年精神病学(2025),doi: 10.1016/j.j ajac .2025.04.008. m.k。是CAMH临床研究更新副主编。 编辑感谢本期《临床研究更新》的撰稿人。编辑已声明他没有竞争利益冲突或潜在利益冲突。这些更新不需要伦理批准。
{"title":"Clinical research updates","authors":"Marinos Kyriakopoulos, Maria Papadaki, Aikaterini Zeza, Niki-Stavroula Panagiotopoulou","doi":"10.1111/camh.70014","DOIUrl":"10.1111/camh.70014","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Maria Papadaki</p><p>Understanding why some children exposed to adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) develop mental health difficulties while others remain resilient is important for designing effective preventive strategies. It has been suggested that the presence of a warm and supportive adult may protect against mental health difficulties in such cases by moderating the negative effects of early adversity. However, it remains unclear whether such an association is causal or whether it may be accounted for by genetic or environmental factors.</p><p>Stock et al. (2025) investigated this question using data from the Environmental Risk (E-Risk) Longitudinal Twin Study, a representative UK-based birth cohort of 2232 same-sex twins. ACEs were assessed prospectively covering the period from age 5 to age 12 years. Maternal warmth was evaluated at two timepoints, at ages 5 and 10 years, using structured speech samples from mothers. Adult support in children's lives was gathered through self-reports at age 12. Mental health outcomes were assessed at age 12 through interviews with parents and teachers and at 18 years through self-reports from the participants using p-factor as a standardized index.</p><p>Initial phenotypic analyses revealed that, among children exposed to ACEs, those who experienced greater maternal warmth and adult support had lower levels of emotional and behavioral problems in early adolescence, as well as lower p-factor scores at 18 years. However, when a monozygotic twin-difference analysis was applied, the strength of these associations was significantly reduced: by about 70% for maternal warmth and 81% for adult support. In twin pairs equally exposed to ACEs, the twin who experienced more maternal warmth and support from adults tended to have similar mental health outcomes to their co-twin.</p><p>The authors identified some limitations to their investigation, including the measurement of adult support through children's self-report, which may be affected by genetically influenced perception bias, the use of difference scores in the twin differences design, which may induce error in the measurement of protective factors, and the possible non-generalisability to singletons.</p><p>Nevertheless, this study suggests that the observed effects of the support by a warm and supportive adult in children experiencing ACEs are largely due to genetic and environmental confounding rather than independent causal effects, which highlights the need for multifaceted interventions. Efforts to improve children's mental health after adversity should not focus exclusively on strengthening adult–child relationships but should also address broader family risk factors and inherited vulnerabilities.</p><p>Stock, S.E., Lacey, R.E., Arseneault, L., Caspi, A., Crush, E., Danese, A., & Baldwin, J.R. (2025). Can a warm and supportive adult protect against mental health problems amongst children with experience of adversity? A twin-differences study. <i>J","PeriodicalId":49291,"journal":{"name":"Child and Adolescent Mental Health","volume":"30 3","pages":"323-324"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0,"publicationDate":"2025-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://acamh.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/camh.70014","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144621014","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Natalia I. Kucirkova, Todd Cherner, Adam K. Dubé, Adrian Pasquarella, Nicola Pitchford, Helen Ross
Our collective article argues for the development of a clear, shared guidance to support responsible collaborations between academic researchers and digital technology companies, particularly in the fields of education and youth mental health. Drawing on longstanding experience in edtech research, we argue that effective academia–industry collaboration requires clearer institutional support, with explicit guidance at both the contractual and community engagement levels to ensure transparency, fair reporting and the inclusion of all stakeholders. We highlight the challenges researchers face, such as limited legal support and difficulties in publishing negative results, and the need for strong contractual safeguards that protect against the suppression of negative results, define data ownership and set transparent terms for data use, publication timelines and study termination. We also advocate for formalized data-sharing protocols and a centralized, anonymized data repository governed by shared principles, enabling more rigorous cross-study analyses and supporting funders, researchers and policymakers in making evidence-based decisions.
{"title":"Commentary: Suggestions for guidance by academics who collaborate with digital companies – a commentary on Bourgaize et al. (2025)","authors":"Natalia I. Kucirkova, Todd Cherner, Adam K. Dubé, Adrian Pasquarella, Nicola Pitchford, Helen Ross","doi":"10.1111/camh.70021","DOIUrl":"10.1111/camh.70021","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Our collective article argues for the development of a clear, shared guidance to support responsible collaborations between academic researchers and digital technology companies, particularly in the fields of education and youth mental health. Drawing on longstanding experience in edtech research, we argue that effective academia–industry collaboration requires clearer institutional support, with explicit guidance at both the contractual and community engagement levels to ensure transparency, fair reporting and the inclusion of all stakeholders. We highlight the challenges researchers face, such as limited legal support and difficulties in publishing negative results, and the need for strong contractual safeguards that protect against the suppression of negative results, define data ownership and set transparent terms for data use, publication timelines and study termination. We also advocate for formalized data-sharing protocols and a centralized, anonymized data repository governed by shared principles, enabling more rigorous cross-study analyses and supporting funders, researchers and policymakers in making evidence-based decisions.</p>","PeriodicalId":49291,"journal":{"name":"Child and Adolescent Mental Health","volume":"30 3","pages":"292-295"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://acamh.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/camh.70021","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144610156","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Guy Chadwick, Claire Davidson, Jason Lang, Sara Landberg, Stephen Koepplinger, Maryan Broadbent, Mike Fordham, Christopher Gillberg, Helen Minnis
There is growing recognition that neurodivergence encompasses overlapping and co-occurring neurodevelopmental traits rather than isolated diagnostic categories. However, clinical services often struggle to adopt holistic, needs-based assessments due to reliance on condition-specific pathways. This article introduces ESSENCE-D, a digital tool designed to support neurodevelopmental formulation by surveying traits across multiple neurotypes without a pre-defined diagnostic focus. ESSENCE-D generates visual profiles that help clinicians and families better understand an individual's strengths and needs, guiding multidisciplinary decision-making. Preliminary piloting suggests the tool is sensitive, user-friendly and could help streamline emerging holistic neurodevelopmental pathways. With ongoing clinical trials underway, ESSENCE-D represents a promising step towards aligning neurodevelopmental services with the principles of neurodiversity and improving care for neurodivergent individuals.
{"title":"Technology Matters: The ESSENCE of holistic neurodivergent identification in a digital age","authors":"Guy Chadwick, Claire Davidson, Jason Lang, Sara Landberg, Stephen Koepplinger, Maryan Broadbent, Mike Fordham, Christopher Gillberg, Helen Minnis","doi":"10.1111/camh.70011","DOIUrl":"10.1111/camh.70011","url":null,"abstract":"<p>There is growing recognition that neurodivergence encompasses overlapping and co-occurring neurodevelopmental traits rather than isolated diagnostic categories. However, clinical services often struggle to adopt holistic, needs-based assessments due to reliance on condition-specific pathways. This article introduces ESSENCE-D, a digital tool designed to support neurodevelopmental formulation by surveying traits across multiple neurotypes without a pre-defined diagnostic focus. ESSENCE-D generates visual profiles that help clinicians and families better understand an individual's strengths and needs, guiding multidisciplinary decision-making. Preliminary piloting suggests the tool is sensitive, user-friendly and could help streamline emerging holistic neurodevelopmental pathways. With ongoing clinical trials underway, ESSENCE-D represents a promising step towards aligning neurodevelopmental services with the principles of neurodiversity and improving care for neurodivergent individuals.</p>","PeriodicalId":49291,"journal":{"name":"Child and Adolescent Mental Health","volume":"30 3","pages":"317-319"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144561729","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Depression and anxiety are common in young people, yet many do not receive adequate support. Current guidelines recommend digital interventions as an effective approach; however, there is a need for more accessible, evidence-based programmes that are co-developed with young people and rigorously evaluated. The bilingual digital programme, MoodHwb, was co-designed with young people with depression and in collaboration with parents, carers, professionals and a digital media company. MoodHwb aims to support young people in managing their mood and well-being. An early evaluation study provided initial support for the programme theory and indicated its acceptability among users. The programme has since been refined based on feedback, and a feasibility randomised controlled trial has been completed.
{"title":"Technology matters: Co-developing & evaluating digital support for young people with depression and anxiety, MoodHwb.","authors":"Rhys Bevan Jones","doi":"10.1111/camh.70004","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/camh.70004","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Depression and anxiety are common in young people, yet many do not receive adequate support. Current guidelines recommend digital interventions as an effective approach; however, there is a need for more accessible, evidence-based programmes that are co-developed with young people and rigorously evaluated. The bilingual digital programme, MoodHwb, was co-designed with young people with depression and in collaboration with parents, carers, professionals and a digital media company. MoodHwb aims to support young people in managing their mood and well-being. An early evaluation study provided initial support for the programme theory and indicated its acceptability among users. The programme has since been refined based on feedback, and a feasibility randomised controlled trial has been completed.</p>","PeriodicalId":49291,"journal":{"name":"Child and Adolescent Mental Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.8,"publicationDate":"2025-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144545795","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
This commentary reflects on a timely and methodologically significant study by Silwal et al., which investigates bullying victimization among adolescents in conflict-affected Eastern Ukraine. Conducted in a context of fragility, social fragmentation, and resource scarcity, the study offers vital insights into how war and its aftermath shape adolescent experiences. It reveals higher rates of bullying in conflict-affected regions, with girls disproportionately targeted—an uncomfortable finding that challenges conventional gender patterns in bullying. Drawing on emerging evidence, the commentary considers the role of desensitization, emotional regulation, and digital exposure in shaping youth aggression. It also highlights the need to address the structural stressors facing adolescents in both post-conflict and post-migration contexts, particularly within disrupted school systems. In response, the commentary calls for integrated and context-responsive interventions that strengthen emotional and social competencies without reinforcing stigma. It further urges researchers and policymakers to acknowledge the politicized nature of post-migration violence discourse and to maintain commitment to nuanced and context-sensitive analysis. The findings underscore that bullying in such settings is a social indicator of wider systemic pressures—an expression of the hidden wars adolescents carry in their daily lives and into their schools.
{"title":"Commentary: The wars within – uncomfortable truths about the bullying of girls in conflict-affected societies","authors":"Mina Fazel","doi":"10.1111/camh.70006","DOIUrl":"10.1111/camh.70006","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This commentary reflects on a timely and methodologically significant study by Silwal et al., which investigates bullying victimization among adolescents in conflict-affected Eastern Ukraine. Conducted in a context of fragility, social fragmentation, and resource scarcity, the study offers vital insights into how war and its aftermath shape adolescent experiences. It reveals higher rates of bullying in conflict-affected regions, with girls disproportionately targeted—an uncomfortable finding that challenges conventional gender patterns in bullying. Drawing on emerging evidence, the commentary considers the role of desensitization, emotional regulation, and digital exposure in shaping youth aggression. It also highlights the need to address the structural stressors facing adolescents in both post-conflict and post-migration contexts, particularly within disrupted school systems. In response, the commentary calls for integrated and context-responsive interventions that strengthen emotional and social competencies without reinforcing stigma. It further urges researchers and policymakers to acknowledge the politicized nature of post-migration violence discourse and to maintain commitment to nuanced and context-sensitive analysis. The findings underscore that bullying in such settings is a social indicator of wider systemic pressures—an expression of the hidden wars adolescents carry in their daily lives and into their schools.</p>","PeriodicalId":49291,"journal":{"name":"Child and Adolescent Mental Health","volume":"30 3","pages":"278-280"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0,"publicationDate":"2025-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://acamh.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/camh.70006","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144545794","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}