Pub Date : 2024-07-19DOI: 10.1353/tech.2024.a933104
Leor Halevi
<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>The Diffusion of “Small” Western Technologies in the Middle East: Invention, Use and Need in the 19th and 20th Centuries</em> by M. Kupferschmidt <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Leor Halevi (bio) </li> </ul> <em>The Diffusion of “Small” Western Technologies in the Middle East: Invention, Use and Need in the 19th and 20th Centuries</em><br/> By Uri M. Kupferschmidt. Berlin: De Gruyter Oldenbourg, 2023. Pp. xii + 278. <p>This book deals with the transfer of technological objects from Europe and the United States to Istanbul, Cairo, and other Middle Eastern cities. In size, these objects range from socks and light bulbs to pianos and cars. Kupferschmidt refers to them as “small” in quotation marks—to distinguish them from massive projects such as railways and hydroelectric dams, the construction of which depended, as Daniel Headrick argues in <em>The Tentacles of Progress</em> (1988), on imperial states’ core political and economic interests. But how should we think historically about the transregional and transcultural diffusion of everyday technologies, as well as novelties in cases where, despite Western dominance, imperialism was hardly at stake? Alongside social anthropologists and multinational marketing researchers, historians of technology and world trade have answered this question in various ways, illustrating the dynamics of the rejection, adoption, and spread of innovations in colonial and postcolonial states. Many of these scholars have emphasized cultural differences and adaptations. Kupferschmidt does the same, highlighting cultural factors when theorizing about the success or failure of diffusion in the Middle East.</p> <p>He contributes to this field through fascinating case studies of objects that have received little attention in a Middle Eastern context. He examines a transimperial department store chain, Orosdi-Back, which Jewish businessmen of Austro-Hungarian descent launched in Istanbul and Cairo in the 1850s. As well as fezzes, umbrellas, and watches, it exported ready-to-wear clothing from European factories to branches in “the Orient.” Additionally, Kupferschmidt refers to the usefulness and impact of four tools: eyeglasses, sewing machines, typewriters, and pianos. Why, he asks, did Arab and Turkish consumers adopt eyeglasses and sewing machines readily but typewriters gradually and pianos minimally? Mass-produced “reading” glasses and sewing machines met both social and professional needs, allowing adults suffering from presbyopia or gender discrimination to engage in “delicate work.” Facilitating their commercial success, too, were advertisements, novel marketing strategies, foreign brokers, minority retailers, and elite adopters.</p> <p>Culture was a barrier to rapid diffusion in the other two cases. Kupfer-schmidt shows what incremental innovations were needed to adapt mechanical typewriters to Arabic and Ottoman-Turkish scripts around 1900. Besides <strong
评论者: 西方 "小型 "技术在中东的传播:M. Kupferschmidt 著 Leor Halevi (bio) The Diffusion of "Small" Western Technologies in the Middle East: Invention, Use and Need in the 19th and 20th Centuries by Uri M. Kupferschmidt:19 世纪和 20 世纪西方 "小型 "技术在中东的传播:发明、使用和需求 作者:Uri M. Kupferschmidt。柏林:De Gruyter Oldenbourg,2023 年。第 xii + 278 页。本书介绍了科技物品从欧洲和美国向伊斯坦布尔、开罗和其他中东城市的转移。这些物品的大小从袜子、灯泡到钢琴和汽车不等。库普费施密特用引号将它们称为 "小型",以区别于铁路和水电大坝等大型项目,正如丹尼尔-海德里克(Daniel Headrick)在《进步的触角》(The Tentacles of Progress,1988 年)一书中所论述的,这些项目的建设取决于帝国国家的核心政治和经济利益。但是,对于日常技术的跨地区和跨文化传播,以及在尽管西方占主导地位但帝国主义几乎没有受到威胁的情况下出现的新技术,我们应该如何进行历史性思考呢?与社会人类学家和跨国营销研究人员一样,技术和世界贸易史学家也以不同的方式回答了这个问题,他们展示了创新在殖民地和后殖民国家被拒绝、采用和传播的动态过程。其中许多学者都强调了文化差异和适应性。库普费施密特也是如此,他在论述中东地区传播的成败时强调了文化因素。他通过对中东地区鲜有人关注的物品进行精彩的案例研究,为这一领域做出了贡献。他研究了奥匈帝国后裔的犹太商人于十九世纪五十年代在伊斯坦布尔和开罗创办的跨帝国连锁百货公司--奥罗斯迪-巴克(Orosdi-Back)。除了羽绒服、雨伞和手表外,它还从欧洲工厂向 "东方 "的分店出口成衣。此外,库普费施密特还提到了眼镜、缝纫机、打字机和钢琴这四种工具的作用和影响。他问道,为什么阿拉伯和土耳其的消费者很容易接受眼镜和缝纫机,而打字机却逐渐被接受,钢琴则很少被接受?批量生产的 "阅读 "眼镜和缝纫机满足了社会和职业需求,使患有老花眼或受到性别歧视的成年人能够从事 "精细工作"。广告、新颖的营销策略、外国经纪人、少数零售商和精英采用者也促进了它们在商业上的成功。而在另外两个案例中,文化则是快速推广的障碍。库普费尔-施密特(Kupfer-schmidt)展示了在 1900 年前后将机械打字机改装成阿拉伯文和奥斯曼土耳其文所需的渐进式创新。除了 [End Page 996] 开头字母和结尾字母外,还需要草书连字符;解决额外字符需求的显而易见的办法是配备两个移位键和三个字符的字条。钢琴的适应性较差。推广过程中遇到的一个挑战是,标准的西方模式 "不适合 "阿拉伯音乐,即具有微调音阶和变奏的马卡姆旋律系统。到 1932 年,几种 "东方 "模式被开发出来,但 "即使是年轻的乌姆-库尔图姆(Umm Kulthum)也未能将她的歌唱与创新乐器协调起来"(第 87 页)。此外,与小提琴不同的是,咖啡馆乐队买得起小提琴,也能从一家咖啡馆带到另一家咖啡馆,但钢琴价格昂贵,难以运输。本书由以前出版的章节和未出版的章节组成,具有作者偶然发现一些证据而逐渐形成的项目的魅力。但我们并不清楚作者为何以及如何选择这四个案例。每个案例是什么?如果库普费施密特关注的是小提琴、自行车、轧棉机和枪支,我们对传播的印象会有什么变化?他多次感叹缺乏可靠的证据和统计数据来更好地了解舶来品在社会中的传播程度。在遗嘱清册和嫁妆清单中大概可以找到更多的证据。选择将重点放在私营部门和个人物品上并无不妥,但在当代基础设施发展的情况下,将灯泡和汽车的传播与电池和未铺设路面的道路联系起来讨论似乎有些矫揉造作。正如鲁道夫-莫拉泽克(Rudolf Mrázek)的《幸福之地的工程师》(2002 年)一书所指出的,个人技术与公共技术之间的界限并不那么严格。另一个看似松散的界限是文化之间的界限。埃及的城市有一个重要的...
{"title":"The Diffusion of \"Small\" Western Technologies in the Middle East: Invention, Use and Need in the 19th and 20th Centuries by M. Kupferschmidt (review)","authors":"Leor Halevi","doi":"10.1353/tech.2024.a933104","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/tech.2024.a933104","url":null,"abstract":"<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>The Diffusion of “Small” Western Technologies in the Middle East: Invention, Use and Need in the 19th and 20th Centuries</em> by M. Kupferschmidt <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Leor Halevi (bio) </li> </ul> <em>The Diffusion of “Small” Western Technologies in the Middle East: Invention, Use and Need in the 19th and 20th Centuries</em><br/> By Uri M. Kupferschmidt. Berlin: De Gruyter Oldenbourg, 2023. Pp. xii + 278. <p>This book deals with the transfer of technological objects from Europe and the United States to Istanbul, Cairo, and other Middle Eastern cities. In size, these objects range from socks and light bulbs to pianos and cars. Kupferschmidt refers to them as “small” in quotation marks—to distinguish them from massive projects such as railways and hydroelectric dams, the construction of which depended, as Daniel Headrick argues in <em>The Tentacles of Progress</em> (1988), on imperial states’ core political and economic interests. But how should we think historically about the transregional and transcultural diffusion of everyday technologies, as well as novelties in cases where, despite Western dominance, imperialism was hardly at stake? Alongside social anthropologists and multinational marketing researchers, historians of technology and world trade have answered this question in various ways, illustrating the dynamics of the rejection, adoption, and spread of innovations in colonial and postcolonial states. Many of these scholars have emphasized cultural differences and adaptations. Kupferschmidt does the same, highlighting cultural factors when theorizing about the success or failure of diffusion in the Middle East.</p> <p>He contributes to this field through fascinating case studies of objects that have received little attention in a Middle Eastern context. He examines a transimperial department store chain, Orosdi-Back, which Jewish businessmen of Austro-Hungarian descent launched in Istanbul and Cairo in the 1850s. As well as fezzes, umbrellas, and watches, it exported ready-to-wear clothing from European factories to branches in “the Orient.” Additionally, Kupferschmidt refers to the usefulness and impact of four tools: eyeglasses, sewing machines, typewriters, and pianos. Why, he asks, did Arab and Turkish consumers adopt eyeglasses and sewing machines readily but typewriters gradually and pianos minimally? Mass-produced “reading” glasses and sewing machines met both social and professional needs, allowing adults suffering from presbyopia or gender discrimination to engage in “delicate work.” Facilitating their commercial success, too, were advertisements, novel marketing strategies, foreign brokers, minority retailers, and elite adopters.</p> <p>Culture was a barrier to rapid diffusion in the other two cases. Kupfer-schmidt shows what incremental innovations were needed to adapt mechanical typewriters to Arabic and Ottoman-Turkish scripts around 1900. Besides <strong","PeriodicalId":49446,"journal":{"name":"Technology and Culture","volume":"304 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2024-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141743663","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-07-19DOI: 10.1353/tech.2024.a933127
Hans-Christian Von Herrmann
<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>Planetarien: Wunder der Technik—Techniken des Wunderns [Planetariums: Miracles of technology—techniques of wonder]</em> by Helen Ahner <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Hans-Christian Von Herrmann (bio) </li> </ul> <em>Planetarien: Wunder der Technik—Techniken des Wunderns</em> [Planetariums: Miracles of technology—techniques of wonder]<br/> By Helen Ahner. Göttingen: Wallstein Verlag, 2023. Pp. 366. <p>The first optomechanical planetarium was opened in 1925 as part of the Department of Astronomy in the new building of the Deutsches Museum in Munich. The projection method for a dome-shaped screen had been developed in the previous years by the Carl Zeiss company in Jena together with Dyckerhoff & Widmann AG, which specialized in shell constructions made of reinforced concrete. Today, the classic projectors in planetariums around the world have been mostly replaced by digital fulldome systems. Since then, there has been a renewed historical interest in this approximately hundred-year-old technical invention; examples include research by Charlotte Bigg and Katherine Boyce-Jacino. In these works, it is above all the aspects of the spectacular that attract interest. In her dissertation project, now available as a book, Helen Ahner also examines the planetarium as a place of popular science education and entertainment.</p> <p>In contrast to earlier studies that address the history of astronomical instruments between antiquity and the industrial age, investigate the sophisticated construction solution of the Zeiss engineers, or locate the planetarium in the history of modern knowledge, including the practices of art, architecture, and scientific simulation, Helen Ahner’s approach succeeds in capturing the surprise and amazement of contemporaries at this artificial experience of nature in the center of the modern city. By treating the planetarium as the “leading fossil of an archaeology of the experience of technology in the 1920s” (p. 185), Ahner thus takes up the ethnographic approach in science and technology studies founded by Stefan Beck in the 1990s.</p> <p>One of the book’s particular strengths lies in the way the author develops her own arguments in constant exchange with a wide-ranging specialist discussion. Important points of reference, alongside social science theories of practice and embodiment, include Ute Frevert’s history of emotions and the concept of “technology emotions” recently outlined by Martina Heßler. At the beginning, however, Ahner makes the simple empirical observation that the planetarium and the perceptual situation created by it was repeatedly associated with the topos of the “miracle” in the public sphere (for example, in the much-used phrase “the miracle of Jena”). At the same time, the attitude of “wonder” was an indispensable driving force behind the communication of knowledge in these places. For Ahner, the entire physical texture of the audience experien
评论者 Planetarien: Wunder der Technik-Techniken des Wunderns [Planetariums: Miracles of technology-techniques of wonder] by Helen Ahner Hans-Christian Von Herrmann (bio) Planetarien: Wunder der Technik-Techniken des Wunderns [Planetariums: Miracles of technology-techniques of wonder] By Helen Ahner.哥廷根:沃尔斯坦出版社,2023 年。Pp.366.第一座光学机械天文馆于 1925 年投入使用,是慕尼黑德意志博物馆新馆天文部的一部分。前几年,耶拿的卡尔蔡司公司与专门从事钢筋混凝土外壳建筑的 Dyckerhoff & Widmann AG 公司共同开发了圆顶形屏幕的投影方法。如今,世界各地天文馆中的传统投影仪大多已被数字全球幕系统所取代。从那时起,人们开始重新关注这一拥有近百年历史的技术发明,夏洛特-比格(Charlotte Bigg)和凯瑟琳-博伊斯-贾西诺(Katherine Boyce-Jacino)的研究就是一例。在这些作品中,吸引人们兴趣的首先是壮观的场面。海伦-阿纳(Helen Ahner)在她的毕业论文项目(现已出版成书)中,也将天文馆作为科普教育和娱乐的场所进行了研究。与之前研究古代和工业时代之间天文仪器的历史、研究蔡司工程师的复杂建筑方案或将天文馆置于现代知识史(包括艺术、建筑和科学模拟实践)中相比,海伦-阿纳的研究方法成功地捕捉到了当代人对现代城市中心这种人工自然体验的惊讶和惊奇。通过将天文馆视为 "20 世纪 20 年代科技体验考古学的主要化石"(第 185 页),阿纳继承了斯特凡-贝克(Stefan Beck)在 20 世纪 90 年代创立的科技研究人种学方法。本书的一个特别之处在于,作者在与广泛的专家讨论不断交流的过程中提出了自己的论点。除了关于实践和体现的社会科学理论之外,本书的重要参考点还包括乌特-弗莱弗特(Ute Frevert)的情感史以及玛蒂娜-赫斯勒(Martina Heßler)最近提出的 "技术情感 "概念。不过,阿赫纳在开头提出了一个简单的经验性观点,即天文馆及其所创造的感知情境在公共领域一再与 "奇迹 "这一主题联系在一起(例如,在 "耶拿奇迹 "这一广为流传的短语中)。同时,"奇迹 "的态度也是这些地方知识传播不可或缺的动力。因此,对阿纳来说,观众体验的整个物理结构比天文馆节目的内容更有意义。为了在历史的长河中证明这一点,本研究不仅限于 1925 年至 1930 年,而且有充分 [第 1041 页完] 理由对四个案例进行了研究:慕尼黑、耶拿、维也纳和汉堡。研究的主要资料来源于报纸文章,这些文章反映了上述城市的建筑落成后所引起的反响。不过,作者并不只关注地区事件的描述,而是主要关注技术史学的方法论,即不关注孤立的技术对象,而是关注其在日常生活复杂结构中的接受情况。因此,阿纳可以说"对天文馆性质和天文馆技术的好奇是一种超越性的体验,这种体验在知识与无知、可能与不可能、自然与文化、人类与机器、过去、现在与未来等界限的博弈中形成,并将天文馆塑造成未来的场所"(第 226 页)。在尼古拉斯-雷(Nicholas Ray)于 1955 年拍摄的著名电影《无因的反叛》中,洛杉矶格里菲斯天文台的天文馆不仅是故事情节的重要地点。它本身也成为主角,让冷战的整个历史背景以及与之相关的核毁灭威胁浮出水面。与此类似,海伦-阿纳对 20 世纪 20 年代后半期天文馆的研究也使天文馆成为一个浓缩了现代性核心主题的公共场所......
{"title":"Planetarien: Wunder der Technik—Techniken des Wunderns [Planetariums: Miracles of technology—techniques of wonder] by Helen Ahner (review)","authors":"Hans-Christian Von Herrmann","doi":"10.1353/tech.2024.a933127","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/tech.2024.a933127","url":null,"abstract":"<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>Planetarien: Wunder der Technik—Techniken des Wunderns [Planetariums: Miracles of technology—techniques of wonder]</em> by Helen Ahner <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Hans-Christian Von Herrmann (bio) </li> </ul> <em>Planetarien: Wunder der Technik—Techniken des Wunderns</em> [Planetariums: Miracles of technology—techniques of wonder]<br/> By Helen Ahner. Göttingen: Wallstein Verlag, 2023. Pp. 366. <p>The first optomechanical planetarium was opened in 1925 as part of the Department of Astronomy in the new building of the Deutsches Museum in Munich. The projection method for a dome-shaped screen had been developed in the previous years by the Carl Zeiss company in Jena together with Dyckerhoff & Widmann AG, which specialized in shell constructions made of reinforced concrete. Today, the classic projectors in planetariums around the world have been mostly replaced by digital fulldome systems. Since then, there has been a renewed historical interest in this approximately hundred-year-old technical invention; examples include research by Charlotte Bigg and Katherine Boyce-Jacino. In these works, it is above all the aspects of the spectacular that attract interest. In her dissertation project, now available as a book, Helen Ahner also examines the planetarium as a place of popular science education and entertainment.</p> <p>In contrast to earlier studies that address the history of astronomical instruments between antiquity and the industrial age, investigate the sophisticated construction solution of the Zeiss engineers, or locate the planetarium in the history of modern knowledge, including the practices of art, architecture, and scientific simulation, Helen Ahner’s approach succeeds in capturing the surprise and amazement of contemporaries at this artificial experience of nature in the center of the modern city. By treating the planetarium as the “leading fossil of an archaeology of the experience of technology in the 1920s” (p. 185), Ahner thus takes up the ethnographic approach in science and technology studies founded by Stefan Beck in the 1990s.</p> <p>One of the book’s particular strengths lies in the way the author develops her own arguments in constant exchange with a wide-ranging specialist discussion. Important points of reference, alongside social science theories of practice and embodiment, include Ute Frevert’s history of emotions and the concept of “technology emotions” recently outlined by Martina Heßler. At the beginning, however, Ahner makes the simple empirical observation that the planetarium and the perceptual situation created by it was repeatedly associated with the topos of the “miracle” in the public sphere (for example, in the much-used phrase “the miracle of Jena”). At the same time, the attitude of “wonder” was an indispensable driving force behind the communication of knowledge in these places. For Ahner, the entire physical texture of the audience experien","PeriodicalId":49446,"journal":{"name":"Technology and Culture","volume":"48 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2024-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141743493","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-07-19DOI: 10.1353/tech.2024.a933123
Melvin Wevers
<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>The Dangerous Art of Text Mining: A Methodology for Digital History</em> by Jo Guldi <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Melvin Wevers (bio) </li> </ul> <em>The Dangerous Art of Text Mining: A Methodology for Digital History</em><br/> By Jo Guldi. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2023. Pp. 465. <p>In <em>The Dangerous Art of Text Mining</em>, historian Jo Guldi explores the application of text mining in historical research. Text mining, a method for quantitatively analyzing digitized text, is utilized by Guldi to examine British parliamentary records. The approach is portrayed as a dual-edged sword, embodying both art and hazard. Guldi characterizes text mining as an art that demands specialized expertise and flexible methodologies, aligning with historians’ heuristic and hermeneutic techniques. At the same time, she warns of its dangers, such as the potential for algorithms to foster overgeneralizations, amplify biases in data, and yield conclusions that overlook historical complexities and the nuanced interpretations of past actors. Despite the book’s ostensibly alarming title, Guldi’s critique of text mining is constructive, underscoring its capacity to enhance historical research if used with discernment, thereby avoiding the pitfalls of technological solutionism that mar some big data and early digital humanities projects.</p> <p>The book is structured into three main sections. The first, “Towards a Smarter Data Science,” outlines Guldi’s methodological approach, advocating for a seamless integration of data science with historical research’s nuanced source criticism. The book adopts a somewhat antagonistic stance toward data science, portraying it as naive regarding data and algorithmic bias. <strong>[End Page 1033]</strong> Guldi posits that historians are uniquely positioned to prevent the uncritical application of algorithms to historical data. While data science studies often overlook such biases (as pointed out by R. Benjamin, <em>Race after Technology</em>, 2019; C. O’Neil, <em>Weapons of Math Destruction</em>, 2016), similar issues are evident in digital humanities and digital history. Think, for example, of the frequent use in digital history of topic modeling algorithms as exploratory tools without inspecting the degree of robustness of the models. Historians could also benefit from work in areas such as explainable AI, where initiatives are being advanced to augment the transparency of AI models, ensuring that users not only trust but also comprehend the underlying mechanisms and rationale of the algorithms employed in their research (for example, Molnar, <em>Interpretable Machine Learning</em>, 2022). Concurrently, information retrieval scholars have developed metrics to evaluate search strategy efficacy. Such metrics deserve more attention in Guldi’s book.</p> <p>Guldi presents the strategy of critical search, which relies on the critical use of multiple algorithms
评论者: 文本挖掘的危险艺术:文本挖掘的危险艺术:数字历史的方法论》 作者:Jo Guldi Melvin Wevers (bio) 《文本挖掘的危险艺术:数字历史的方法论》 作者:Jo Guldi Melvin Wevers (bio)Jo Guldi 著。剑桥:剑桥大学出版社,2023 年。页码465.在《文本挖掘的危险艺术》一书中,历史学家乔-古尔迪探讨了文本挖掘在历史研究中的应用。文本挖掘是一种对数字化文本进行定量分析的方法,古尔迪利用这种方法研究了英国议会记录。这种方法被描绘成一把双刃剑,既是艺术也是危险。古尔迪将文本挖掘描述为一门艺术,需要专业的知识和灵活的方法,与历史学家的启发式和诠释式技术相一致。同时,她也对其危险性提出警告,比如算法可能会助长过度概括、放大数据中的偏差,以及得出忽略历史复杂性和过去参与者细微解读的结论。尽管该书的标题表面上令人担忧,但古尔迪对文本挖掘的批评是建设性的,强调了文本挖掘在审慎使用的情况下加强历史研究的能力,从而避免了技术解决方案主义的陷阱,而这正是一些大数据和早期数字人文项目的弊端。本书分为三个主要部分。第一部分 "迈向更智能的数据科学 "概述了古尔迪的方法论,主张将数据科学与历史研究的细微源头批判无缝结合。该书对数据科学采取了某种对立的立场,认为数据科学在数据和算法偏见方面过于天真。[古尔迪认为,历史学家在防止将算法不加批判地应用于历史数据方面具有得天独厚的优势。虽然数据科学研究经常忽略此类偏见(如 R. Benjamin,Race after Technology,2019;C. O'Neil,Weapons of Math Destruction,2016),但类似的问题在数字人文和数字历史中也很明显。例如,数字历史中经常使用主题建模算法作为探索工具,却不检查模型的稳健程度。历史学家还可以从可解释人工智能等领域的工作中获益,这些领域正在推进提高人工智能模型透明度的举措,以确保用户不仅信任而且理解其研究中所使用算法的基本机制和原理(例如,Molnar, Interpretable Machine Learning, 2022)。与此同时,信息检索学者也制定了评估搜索策略有效性的指标。在古尔迪的书中,这些指标值得更多关注。古尔迪提出了批判性搜索策略,该策略依赖于批判性地使用多种算法来指导对大量历史资料的查询。这里的 "批判 "指的是意识到数据和算法在每一步过程中可能带来的偏差。她的语言有效地引起了历史学家的共鸣,可能会增加该方法的采用率。不过,如果能将数据科学方法与验证策略结合起来,就能促进这两个学科更紧密地融合。该书巧妙地讨论了为什么预测对许多历史学家来说是一个有争议和困难的概念。鉴于历史的偶然性和数据的稀缺性,预测是出了名的困难。然而,古尔迪将建模狭隘地视为一种主要的预测工具,从而忽略了建模对历史学家的益处。如果能更广泛地探讨建模的其他应用,如指导解释和理解数据偏差,将大有裨益(例如,J. Epstein, Why Model?)如果能对方法干预进行更广泛的概述,包括机器学习、抽样和时间序列分析,或许能平衡例子的广度。专注于文本挖掘并不一定是本书的缺陷,但书中的许多技术都是重复的,使本书有些重复。总体而言,该书存在编辑方面的问题,包括脚注错误、前后矛盾和内容重复。第二部分是本书的精华所在,介绍了一些案例研究,涉及时间经验主题,如记忆、时期化和事件。古尔迪善于利用历史理论作为文本挖掘方法、数据和历史探究之间的通道。她展示了莱因哈特-科塞勒克(Reinhardt Koselleck)、威廉-西维尔(William Sewell)和阿斯特丽德-埃尔(Astrid Erll)等学者的理论如何将历史数据分析目标转化为具体的方法应用。因此,该书有效地论证了在推进(数字)历史学的过程中,理论与方法的更紧密结合。 [尾页...
{"title":"The Dangerous Art of Text Mining: A Methodology for Digital History by Jo Guldi (review)","authors":"Melvin Wevers","doi":"10.1353/tech.2024.a933123","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/tech.2024.a933123","url":null,"abstract":"<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>The Dangerous Art of Text Mining: A Methodology for Digital History</em> by Jo Guldi <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Melvin Wevers (bio) </li> </ul> <em>The Dangerous Art of Text Mining: A Methodology for Digital History</em><br/> By Jo Guldi. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2023. Pp. 465. <p>In <em>The Dangerous Art of Text Mining</em>, historian Jo Guldi explores the application of text mining in historical research. Text mining, a method for quantitatively analyzing digitized text, is utilized by Guldi to examine British parliamentary records. The approach is portrayed as a dual-edged sword, embodying both art and hazard. Guldi characterizes text mining as an art that demands specialized expertise and flexible methodologies, aligning with historians’ heuristic and hermeneutic techniques. At the same time, she warns of its dangers, such as the potential for algorithms to foster overgeneralizations, amplify biases in data, and yield conclusions that overlook historical complexities and the nuanced interpretations of past actors. Despite the book’s ostensibly alarming title, Guldi’s critique of text mining is constructive, underscoring its capacity to enhance historical research if used with discernment, thereby avoiding the pitfalls of technological solutionism that mar some big data and early digital humanities projects.</p> <p>The book is structured into three main sections. The first, “Towards a Smarter Data Science,” outlines Guldi’s methodological approach, advocating for a seamless integration of data science with historical research’s nuanced source criticism. The book adopts a somewhat antagonistic stance toward data science, portraying it as naive regarding data and algorithmic bias. <strong>[End Page 1033]</strong> Guldi posits that historians are uniquely positioned to prevent the uncritical application of algorithms to historical data. While data science studies often overlook such biases (as pointed out by R. Benjamin, <em>Race after Technology</em>, 2019; C. O’Neil, <em>Weapons of Math Destruction</em>, 2016), similar issues are evident in digital humanities and digital history. Think, for example, of the frequent use in digital history of topic modeling algorithms as exploratory tools without inspecting the degree of robustness of the models. Historians could also benefit from work in areas such as explainable AI, where initiatives are being advanced to augment the transparency of AI models, ensuring that users not only trust but also comprehend the underlying mechanisms and rationale of the algorithms employed in their research (for example, Molnar, <em>Interpretable Machine Learning</em>, 2022). Concurrently, information retrieval scholars have developed metrics to evaluate search strategy efficacy. Such metrics deserve more attention in Guldi’s book.</p> <p>Guldi presents the strategy of critical search, which relies on the critical use of multiple algorithms ","PeriodicalId":49446,"journal":{"name":"Technology and Culture","volume":"63 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2024-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141743494","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-07-19DOI: 10.1353/tech.2024.a933125
Richard Legay
<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>Radiophilia</em> by Carolyn Birdsall <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Richard Legay (bio) </li> </ul> <em>Radiophilia</em><br/> By Carolyn Birdsall. New York: Bloomsbury, 2023. Pp. 279. <p>Just in time to mark radio’s first century in many countries, Carolyn Birdsall’s <em>Radiophilia</em> is a particularly welcome and original addition to the scholarship of both radio studies and broadcasting history. This ambitious book introduces a new concept, “radiophilia,” understood as the attachment to or love for radio, and goes on to successfully unravel its various constitutive elements from the early days of the wireless to today, in multiple geographical contexts.</p> <p>To undertake this task, the book often balances between overarching questions and concrete examples and is split into four chapters, simply named “Loving,” “Knowing,” “Saving,” and “Sharing.” This rather unusual approach of one-word progressive verbs as chapter titles is actually an excellent way for Birdsall to explicate her concept, as she can focus on what ties people (i.e., practices and emotions) to the medium over time. In the first pages, the attention is put on loving radio, both as action and practice, concerning individuals and groups. This is analyzed first in a historical manner, showing various forms of radiophilia over time, then through the lens of history of emotions, and finally in a multisensory and multimedia dimension. The book then moves on to the topic of knowing radio, shedding light on knowledge production as radiophilia. This chapter includes the communities formed around this technical hobby in the early days of radio, the importance of regulators and the industry, and the relationship between knowledge and affect, especially present with fan culture. In “Saving,” the author delves into the various shapes taken by radiophiliacs to preserve and hang on to the ephemeral sounds of the medium. Interestingly, this chapter includes amateur and professional actors as well as analogue and digital practices, revealing the width of the topic. The fourth chapter explores the issue of how enthusiasts have shared their love of radio over the last century. The net cast to catch the heterogeneity of this question is wide as individual, local, and national activities, practices, objects, spaces, and curatorial choices are all included. Overall, the author successfully balances an ambitious new and overarching concept with more concrete examples, and by doing so brings in a wide range of geographical and historical contexts, which makes the result particularly convincing. Interestingly, the author’s personal attachment to radio is also discussed on a few occasions in the book, which helps with understanding her perspective on the topic at hand and will likely echo many readers’ own relationship with radio. <strong>[End Page 1037]</strong></p> <p>In regard to the book’s contribution to the existing scholarship, a fe
评论者 Radiophilia by Carolyn Birdsall Richard Legay (bio) Radiophilia By Carolyn Birdsall.纽约:布鲁姆斯伯里出版社,2023 年。第 279 页。Carolyn Birdsall 的这本《Radiophilia》正好赶上了无线电在许多国家的第一个世纪,是无线电研究和广播史学术领域特别受欢迎的原创性补充。这本雄心勃勃的著作提出了一个新概念--"radiophilia",即对广播的依恋或热爱,并成功地揭示了从早期无线广播时代到今天,在不同地域背景下的各种构成要素。为了完成这项任务,该书经常在总体问题和具体实例之间取得平衡,并分为四章,分别命名为 "热爱"、"了解"、"拯救 "和 "分享"。伯德索尔以单字渐进动词作为章节标题,这种颇不寻常的做法实际上是阐释其概念的绝佳方式,因为她可以将重点放在随着时间的推移,是什么将人们(即实践和情感)与媒介联系在一起。在前几页中,重点放在了对广播的热爱上,无论是作为行动还是实践,都与个人和群体有关。首先以历史的方式进行分析,展示了随着时间推移出现的各种形式的恋电台行为,然后从情感史的角度进行分析,最后从多感官和多媒体的维度进行分析。然后,本书转向 "了解无线电 "这一主题,揭示了作为 "无线电嗜好 "的知识生产。这一章包括广播早期围绕这一技术爱好形成的社区、监管机构和行业的重要性,以及知识与情感之间的关系,尤其是粉丝文化。在 "保存 "一章中,作者深入探讨了无线电爱好者为保存和坚持这一媒介短暂的声音而采取的各种形式。有趣的是,这一章包括了业余和专业演员,以及模拟和数字实践,揭示了这一主题的广泛性。第四章探讨了过去一个世纪中爱好者如何分享他们对无线电的热爱。该书网罗广泛,涵盖了个人、地方和国家的活动、实践、物品、空间和策展选择,从而捕捉到了这一问题的异质性。总之,作者成功地平衡了一个雄心勃勃的全新总体概念和更具体的实例,并由此引入了广泛的地理和历史背景,使其成果特别具有说服力。有趣的是,书中还多次谈到作者个人对无线电的感情,这有助于理解她对当前主题的看法,也可能与许多读者自己与无线电的关系相呼应。[关于本书对现有学术研究的贡献,有几点值得一提。首先,也是最重要的一点是,作者对有关这一主题的科学文献的了解和掌握是毋庸置疑的。事实上,该书建立在各领域广泛的出版物基础之上,包括历史、广播与媒体研究、技术史、情感史以及粉丝研究。除了深入的理论探讨外,书中还收录了涵盖世界许多地区的大量实例;英文出版物占主导地位的现象十分明显,但这也是该主题所固有的问题。因此,本书不仅建立在现有学术成果的基础上,还通过引入 "radiophilia "这一新概念,以创新的方式对现有学术成果做出了直接贡献。毫无疑问,这本书对许多学者都会有帮助,因为任何从事过广播工作的人--包括这篇评论的作者--都会遇到过某种形式的 "恋电台癖",也许还会受到它的影响。在这方面,《Radiophilia》可能与 Marine Beccarelli 的《Micros de nuit》(2021 年)和 Sean Street 的《Radio Waves》(2004 年)有异曲同工之妙,前者是对法国夜间广播及其与听众之间特殊亲密关系的研究,后者是对学者兼诗人对广播的热爱的颂扬。更具体地说,第三章中详述的对广播保存的分析对于对广播媒体历史感兴趣的读者尤为重要,因为它提供了一个批判性的视角,并对他们所使用的资料的保存方式进行了潜在的背景分析。除了为广播研究和广播史带来新的见解之外...
{"title":"Radiophilia by Carolyn Birdsall (review)","authors":"Richard Legay","doi":"10.1353/tech.2024.a933125","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/tech.2024.a933125","url":null,"abstract":"<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>Radiophilia</em> by Carolyn Birdsall <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Richard Legay (bio) </li> </ul> <em>Radiophilia</em><br/> By Carolyn Birdsall. New York: Bloomsbury, 2023. Pp. 279. <p>Just in time to mark radio’s first century in many countries, Carolyn Birdsall’s <em>Radiophilia</em> is a particularly welcome and original addition to the scholarship of both radio studies and broadcasting history. This ambitious book introduces a new concept, “radiophilia,” understood as the attachment to or love for radio, and goes on to successfully unravel its various constitutive elements from the early days of the wireless to today, in multiple geographical contexts.</p> <p>To undertake this task, the book often balances between overarching questions and concrete examples and is split into four chapters, simply named “Loving,” “Knowing,” “Saving,” and “Sharing.” This rather unusual approach of one-word progressive verbs as chapter titles is actually an excellent way for Birdsall to explicate her concept, as she can focus on what ties people (i.e., practices and emotions) to the medium over time. In the first pages, the attention is put on loving radio, both as action and practice, concerning individuals and groups. This is analyzed first in a historical manner, showing various forms of radiophilia over time, then through the lens of history of emotions, and finally in a multisensory and multimedia dimension. The book then moves on to the topic of knowing radio, shedding light on knowledge production as radiophilia. This chapter includes the communities formed around this technical hobby in the early days of radio, the importance of regulators and the industry, and the relationship between knowledge and affect, especially present with fan culture. In “Saving,” the author delves into the various shapes taken by radiophiliacs to preserve and hang on to the ephemeral sounds of the medium. Interestingly, this chapter includes amateur and professional actors as well as analogue and digital practices, revealing the width of the topic. The fourth chapter explores the issue of how enthusiasts have shared their love of radio over the last century. The net cast to catch the heterogeneity of this question is wide as individual, local, and national activities, practices, objects, spaces, and curatorial choices are all included. Overall, the author successfully balances an ambitious new and overarching concept with more concrete examples, and by doing so brings in a wide range of geographical and historical contexts, which makes the result particularly convincing. Interestingly, the author’s personal attachment to radio is also discussed on a few occasions in the book, which helps with understanding her perspective on the topic at hand and will likely echo many readers’ own relationship with radio. <strong>[End Page 1037]</strong></p> <p>In regard to the book’s contribution to the existing scholarship, a fe","PeriodicalId":49446,"journal":{"name":"Technology and Culture","volume":"39 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2024-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141743503","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-07-19DOI: 10.1353/tech.2024.a933140
David Foster
<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>The Dallas Story: The North American Aviation Plant and Industrial Mobilization during World War II</em> by Terrance Furgerson <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> David Foster (bio) </li> </ul> <em>The Dallas Story: The North American Aviation Plant and Industrial Mobilization during World War II</em><br/> By Terrance Furgerson. Denton: University of North Texas Press, 2023. Pp. xii + 403. <p>Today, Dallas is a major hub within the global aerospace network. But until 1940, aircraft design and production in the United States was concentrated on the two coasts. In this book, Terrance Furgerson shows how and why Dallas got its start in the aviation industry on the eve of World War II and how the showcase North American Aviation (NAA) plant, in turn, brought industrial-scale manufacturing into the heart of North Texas. Texas had long been a key region in the nation’s military activities, going back to the state’s incorporation into the United States in 1845. Early innovations in land- and sea-based aviation had been going on at military bases in San Antonio, Corpus Christi, and elsewhere across the state since the end of World War I, as Texas’s open spaces and favorable weather attracted aviation visionaries, pioneers, and enthusiasts.</p> <p>The Dallas Story is a welcome addition to the thin extant historiography of the aviation and aerospace industry in Texas. Furgerson’s focus on the political-industrial story in Texas complements Barbara Ganson’s recent Texas Takes Wing (2014) and serves as an important bridge between older titles such as E. C. Barksdale’s The Genesis of the Aviation Industry in North Texas (1958) and Roger Bilstein and Jay Miller’s Aviation in Texas (1985), as well as the numerous studies of the Cold War and post–Cold War eras that invariably center on Texas’s key aerospace role within the broader military-industrial milieu.</p> <p>NAA’s Dallas plant was up and running by the time the United States entered the war in December 1941, but the demands of wartime production rates, design iterations, and manufacturing expansion stressed the available skilled-labor pool. Further distractions came with an endless stream of official visitors to the Dallas plant for tours and the encouragement of the plant employees. Yet within a few short years, the NAA Dallas plant had produced thousands of AT-6 Texan trainers, B-24 Liberator bombers, and P-51 Mustang fighters for the war effort.</p> <p>The book is aptly titled. This is truly a story of Dallas-based interests providing the driving force to bring a new industry into the area at a time before the nation’s military-industrial system was widespread, mature, and based out of Washington, D.C. At that time, Texas had a strong aviation culture that had materially contributed to the technical and operational innovations for air travel and mail delivery. Such prominent national Texans as Vice President John Nance Garner and Speaker of the
评论者: 达拉斯的故事:达拉斯的故事:二战期间北美航空工厂和工业动员》,作者:Terrance Furgerson David Foster(简历) 《达拉斯的故事:二战期间北美航空工厂和工业动员》,作者:Terrance Furgerson:达拉斯的故事:二战期间北美航空工厂和工业动员 作者:Terrance Furgerson。丹顿:北德克萨斯大学出版社,2023 年。第 xii + 403 页。今天,达拉斯是全球航空航天网络中的一个重要枢纽。但在 1940 年之前,美国的飞机设计和生产主要集中在两岸。在本书中,特伦斯-弗格森展示了达拉斯如何以及为何在二战前夕开始从事航空业,以及展示北美航空(NAA)工厂如何反过来将工业规模的制造业带入北德克萨斯的中心地带。得克萨斯州自 1845 年并入美国以来,一直是国家军事活动的重要地区。第一次世界大战结束后,由于得克萨斯州开阔的空间和适宜的气候吸引了航空梦想家、开拓者和爱好者,在圣安东尼奥、科珀斯克里斯蒂和全州其他地方的军事基地进行了陆基和海基航空的早期创新。达拉斯的故事》是对德克萨斯州航空和航天工业现存单薄史料的有益补充。弗格森对德克萨斯州政治-工业故事的关注补充了芭芭拉-甘森(Barbara Ganson)最近出版的《德克萨斯插上翅膀》(Texas Takes Wing,2014 年),并在 E. C. 巴克斯代尔(E. C. Barksdale)的《北德克萨斯航空业的起源》(The Genesis of the Aviation Industry in North Texas,1958 年)、罗杰-比尔斯坦(Roger Bilstein)和杰伊-米勒(Jay Miller)的《德克萨斯的航空业》(Aviation in Texas,1985 年)等老书,以及众多冷战和后冷战时代的研究之间架起了一座重要的桥梁。1941 年 12 月美国参战时,NAA 的达拉斯工厂已经开始运转,但战时生产率、设计迭代和制造扩张等方面的需求对现有的技术劳动力储备造成了压力。达拉斯工厂的官方参观者络绎不绝,加上工厂员工的鼓励,进一步分散了他们的注意力。然而在短短几年内,NAA达拉斯工厂就为战争生产了数千架AT-6 "德克萨斯人 "教练机、B-24 "解放者 "轰炸机和P-51 "野马 "战斗机。这本书的标题非常贴切。当时,得克萨斯州拥有浓厚的航空文化,为航空旅行和邮件递送的技术和操作创新做出了重大贡献。德克萨斯州副总统约翰-南斯-加纳(John Nance Garner)和众议院议长山姆-雷伯恩(Sam Rayburn)等德州知名人士都是 NAA 在德克萨斯州发展的外围人物。达拉斯的公民和商界领袖们精力充沛、目光远大,他们希望将当地经济 [完 1065 页] 扩展到牧场、铁路和石油以外的领域,并将 20 世纪 30 年代末酝酿的国际风云视为吸引航空制造业进入该地区的契机。这些地方举措与国家将关键材料生产安全地安置在内陆地区的战略利益相结合。到 1944 年,达拉斯 NAA 工厂的就业人数占达拉斯工业就业人数的近 80%。作者利用企业、博物馆、地方和国家政府实体的档案,揭示了围绕最先进飞机设计和生产的地方、州和国家层面的政治、劳工、工业和社会历史的相互联系。尤为有趣的是,弗格森利用各种地方期刊,生动地描绘了德克萨斯州政治家、社区规划者、贸易促进者、商界领袖和邻里协会在改造经济的同时,将达拉斯与蓬勃发展的民主制度紧密联系在一起的整个大达拉斯地区的风貌。该书分为近二十几个章节,巧妙地引导读者从 20 世纪 30 年代末第二次世界大战的海外起源,一直读到 20 世纪 80 年代末的达拉斯。
{"title":"The Dallas Story: The North American Aviation Plant and Industrial Mobilization during World War II by Terrance Furgerson (review)","authors":"David Foster","doi":"10.1353/tech.2024.a933140","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/tech.2024.a933140","url":null,"abstract":"<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>The Dallas Story: The North American Aviation Plant and Industrial Mobilization during World War II</em> by Terrance Furgerson <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> David Foster (bio) </li> </ul> <em>The Dallas Story: The North American Aviation Plant and Industrial Mobilization during World War II</em><br/> By Terrance Furgerson. Denton: University of North Texas Press, 2023. Pp. xii + 403. <p>Today, Dallas is a major hub within the global aerospace network. But until 1940, aircraft design and production in the United States was concentrated on the two coasts. In this book, Terrance Furgerson shows how and why Dallas got its start in the aviation industry on the eve of World War II and how the showcase North American Aviation (NAA) plant, in turn, brought industrial-scale manufacturing into the heart of North Texas. Texas had long been a key region in the nation’s military activities, going back to the state’s incorporation into the United States in 1845. Early innovations in land- and sea-based aviation had been going on at military bases in San Antonio, Corpus Christi, and elsewhere across the state since the end of World War I, as Texas’s open spaces and favorable weather attracted aviation visionaries, pioneers, and enthusiasts.</p> <p>The Dallas Story is a welcome addition to the thin extant historiography of the aviation and aerospace industry in Texas. Furgerson’s focus on the political-industrial story in Texas complements Barbara Ganson’s recent Texas Takes Wing (2014) and serves as an important bridge between older titles such as E. C. Barksdale’s The Genesis of the Aviation Industry in North Texas (1958) and Roger Bilstein and Jay Miller’s Aviation in Texas (1985), as well as the numerous studies of the Cold War and post–Cold War eras that invariably center on Texas’s key aerospace role within the broader military-industrial milieu.</p> <p>NAA’s Dallas plant was up and running by the time the United States entered the war in December 1941, but the demands of wartime production rates, design iterations, and manufacturing expansion stressed the available skilled-labor pool. Further distractions came with an endless stream of official visitors to the Dallas plant for tours and the encouragement of the plant employees. Yet within a few short years, the NAA Dallas plant had produced thousands of AT-6 Texan trainers, B-24 Liberator bombers, and P-51 Mustang fighters for the war effort.</p> <p>The book is aptly titled. This is truly a story of Dallas-based interests providing the driving force to bring a new industry into the area at a time before the nation’s military-industrial system was widespread, mature, and based out of Washington, D.C. At that time, Texas had a strong aviation culture that had materially contributed to the technical and operational innovations for air travel and mail delivery. Such prominent national Texans as Vice President John Nance Garner and Speaker of the ","PeriodicalId":49446,"journal":{"name":"Technology and Culture","volume":"48 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2024-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141743504","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-07-19DOI: 10.1353/tech.2024.a933142
Kristine Grønning Ericson
<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>Architecture’s Model Environments</em> by Lisa Moffitt <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Kristine Grønning Ericson (bio) </li> </ul> <em>Architecture’s Model Environments</em><br/> By Lisa Moffitt. London: UCL Press, 2023. Pp. 209. <p>In contemporary architectural practice, common methods for representing and analyzing airflow include computer-generated simulations and static two-dimensional diagrams. These techniques have limitations, particularly for architects engaged in the early stages of the design process. As architect Lisa Moffitt writes in <em>Architecture’s Model Environments</em>, previously understudied physical models from the mid-nineteenth through the mid-twentieth centuries in Europe and North America may suggest alternative approaches to visualizing and designing with airflow in the present. These approaches are especially resonant at a time of changing climates, evolving relationships to airborne disease, and persisting environmental inequities.</p> <p>Moffitt’s book is the most recent addition to UCL Press’s Design Research in Architecture series. Over the past decade, “design research” has become a catchall term for diverse approaches to incorporating multidisciplinary research methods into architectural design practice. In this contribution to the series, Moffitt presents a method of design research that combines historical case study analysis with construction, experimental testing, and exhibition of physical models. Moffitt argues that building and interacting with physical models can provoke new insights about historical episodes in the visualization of air. These historical precedents, in turn, inspire speculation about built environments at multiple scales in the present.</p> <p>The book has four central chapters. It begins with a chapter on Moffitt’s own construction of “environmental models,” which she defines as “instruments which create controlled environments that make the phenomena of airflow visible in relation to an architectural model” (ch. 2). The subsequent three chapters present historical case studies of environmental models, each exploring resonances with Moffitt’s own experiments (chs. 3–5).</p> <p>In chapter 2, Moffitt categorizes her environmental models into three types: wind tunnels, water tables, and filling boxes. These models, created as <strong>[End Page 1068]</strong> part of Moffitt’s dissertation research at the University of Edinburgh, draw on her experiences working as an architect in North America in the 2000s. Moffitt introduces a do-it-yourself approach to building each prototype. Extensive documentation of the design and construction process for each iteration provides readers with resources to replicate the prototypes using laser cutters, 3D printers, and traditional carpentry tools. Moffitt notes that such physical models make the diffuse, complex behavior of air more tangible and intuitive for designers by visualizing flows usi
{"title":"Architecture's Model Environments by Lisa Moffitt (review)","authors":"Kristine Grønning Ericson","doi":"10.1353/tech.2024.a933142","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/tech.2024.a933142","url":null,"abstract":"<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>Architecture’s Model Environments</em> by Lisa Moffitt <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Kristine Grønning Ericson (bio) </li> </ul> <em>Architecture’s Model Environments</em><br/> By Lisa Moffitt. London: UCL Press, 2023. Pp. 209. <p>In contemporary architectural practice, common methods for representing and analyzing airflow include computer-generated simulations and static two-dimensional diagrams. These techniques have limitations, particularly for architects engaged in the early stages of the design process. As architect Lisa Moffitt writes in <em>Architecture’s Model Environments</em>, previously understudied physical models from the mid-nineteenth through the mid-twentieth centuries in Europe and North America may suggest alternative approaches to visualizing and designing with airflow in the present. These approaches are especially resonant at a time of changing climates, evolving relationships to airborne disease, and persisting environmental inequities.</p> <p>Moffitt’s book is the most recent addition to UCL Press’s Design Research in Architecture series. Over the past decade, “design research” has become a catchall term for diverse approaches to incorporating multidisciplinary research methods into architectural design practice. In this contribution to the series, Moffitt presents a method of design research that combines historical case study analysis with construction, experimental testing, and exhibition of physical models. Moffitt argues that building and interacting with physical models can provoke new insights about historical episodes in the visualization of air. These historical precedents, in turn, inspire speculation about built environments at multiple scales in the present.</p> <p>The book has four central chapters. It begins with a chapter on Moffitt’s own construction of “environmental models,” which she defines as “instruments which create controlled environments that make the phenomena of airflow visible in relation to an architectural model” (ch. 2). The subsequent three chapters present historical case studies of environmental models, each exploring resonances with Moffitt’s own experiments (chs. 3–5).</p> <p>In chapter 2, Moffitt categorizes her environmental models into three types: wind tunnels, water tables, and filling boxes. These models, created as <strong>[End Page 1068]</strong> part of Moffitt’s dissertation research at the University of Edinburgh, draw on her experiences working as an architect in North America in the 2000s. Moffitt introduces a do-it-yourself approach to building each prototype. Extensive documentation of the design and construction process for each iteration provides readers with resources to replicate the prototypes using laser cutters, 3D printers, and traditional carpentry tools. Moffitt notes that such physical models make the diffuse, complex behavior of air more tangible and intuitive for designers by visualizing flows usi","PeriodicalId":49446,"journal":{"name":"Technology and Culture","volume":"78 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2024-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141743509","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-07-19DOI: 10.1353/tech.2024.a933124
Agata Ignaciuk
<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>The Family Planning Association and Contraceptive Science and Technology in Mid-Twentieth-Century Britain</em> by Natasha Szuhan <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Agata Ignaciuk (bio) </li> </ul> <em>The Family Planning Association and Contraceptive Science and Technology in Mid-Twentieth-Century Britain</em><br/> By Natasha Szuhan. Cham: Palgrave MacMillan, 2023. Pp. 294. <p>Natasha Szuhan’s objective in this history of the Family Planning Association (FPA), a leading organization in the British contraceptive arena, established in 1931 and absorbed into the NHS during the 1970s, is to highlight the FPA’s role in demystifying and legitimizing contraception and sex as medical and social phenomena (p. 1). Drawing on the archives of the FPA held in the Wellcome Collection and dialoguing with the recent expansive wave of scholarship on contraceptive technologies, markets, and expertise in Britain during the central decades of the twentieth century (including Claire Jones, <em>The Business of Birth Control</em>, 2020; Jessica Borge, <em>Protective Practices</em>, 2020; and Caroline Rusterholz, <em>Women’s Medicine</em>, 2020), the distinctive value of Szuhan’s contribution lies in her crafting of the FPA story as a scientific and, to a lesser extent, social biography. Chapters are themed around the organization’s involvement in developing standards for contraceptive-gynecological care, testing and endorsing specific contraceptive technologies, conducting public health research into contraceptive practices and effectiveness, and lobbying on medical issues. While exploring relations between the FPA and the British government, the contraceptive industry, and medical lobbying groups, Szuhan also highlights the contributions made by individual physicians, researchers, and leading contraceptive firms. <strong>[End Page 1035]</strong></p> <p>Drawing on a vast and meticulously documented source base, <em>The Family Planning Association</em> imaginatively contributes to many key themes in the social history of mid-twentieth-century contraceptive technologies, such as the design of spaces and protocols for birth control clinics during the 1930s (ch. 2), the testing of barrier methods and spermicides (ch. 4), the uneasy relationships between family planning organizations and manufacturers (chs. 3–5), and how contraceptive lobbying groups operated in the intersecting arenas of state regulatory bodies, emerging national health authorities, medical elites, industry, and voluntary organizations (ch. 5). Centered on the professional biography of Helena Wright and including an analysis of her writing for popular and specialized audiences, chapter 3 will particularly appeal to wider audiences interested in contraceptive standards and the transnational biographies and careers of women physicians. The interesting stories of FPA disagreements with contraceptive manufacturers and the British Medical Association ar
{"title":"The Family Planning Association and Contraceptive Science and Technology in Mid-Twentieth-Century Britain by Natasha Szuhan (review)","authors":"Agata Ignaciuk","doi":"10.1353/tech.2024.a933124","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/tech.2024.a933124","url":null,"abstract":"<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>The Family Planning Association and Contraceptive Science and Technology in Mid-Twentieth-Century Britain</em> by Natasha Szuhan <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Agata Ignaciuk (bio) </li> </ul> <em>The Family Planning Association and Contraceptive Science and Technology in Mid-Twentieth-Century Britain</em><br/> By Natasha Szuhan. Cham: Palgrave MacMillan, 2023. Pp. 294. <p>Natasha Szuhan’s objective in this history of the Family Planning Association (FPA), a leading organization in the British contraceptive arena, established in 1931 and absorbed into the NHS during the 1970s, is to highlight the FPA’s role in demystifying and legitimizing contraception and sex as medical and social phenomena (p. 1). Drawing on the archives of the FPA held in the Wellcome Collection and dialoguing with the recent expansive wave of scholarship on contraceptive technologies, markets, and expertise in Britain during the central decades of the twentieth century (including Claire Jones, <em>The Business of Birth Control</em>, 2020; Jessica Borge, <em>Protective Practices</em>, 2020; and Caroline Rusterholz, <em>Women’s Medicine</em>, 2020), the distinctive value of Szuhan’s contribution lies in her crafting of the FPA story as a scientific and, to a lesser extent, social biography. Chapters are themed around the organization’s involvement in developing standards for contraceptive-gynecological care, testing and endorsing specific contraceptive technologies, conducting public health research into contraceptive practices and effectiveness, and lobbying on medical issues. While exploring relations between the FPA and the British government, the contraceptive industry, and medical lobbying groups, Szuhan also highlights the contributions made by individual physicians, researchers, and leading contraceptive firms. <strong>[End Page 1035]</strong></p> <p>Drawing on a vast and meticulously documented source base, <em>The Family Planning Association</em> imaginatively contributes to many key themes in the social history of mid-twentieth-century contraceptive technologies, such as the design of spaces and protocols for birth control clinics during the 1930s (ch. 2), the testing of barrier methods and spermicides (ch. 4), the uneasy relationships between family planning organizations and manufacturers (chs. 3–5), and how contraceptive lobbying groups operated in the intersecting arenas of state regulatory bodies, emerging national health authorities, medical elites, industry, and voluntary organizations (ch. 5). Centered on the professional biography of Helena Wright and including an analysis of her writing for popular and specialized audiences, chapter 3 will particularly appeal to wider audiences interested in contraceptive standards and the transnational biographies and careers of women physicians. The interesting stories of FPA disagreements with contraceptive manufacturers and the British Medical Association ar","PeriodicalId":49446,"journal":{"name":"Technology and Culture","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2024-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141743492","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-07-19DOI: 10.1353/tech.2024.a933133
Felix Selgert
<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>Im Medienlabor der US-amerikanischen Industrieforschung: Die gemeinsamen Wurzeln von Massenmedien und Bürokratie 1870–1950 [In the media laboratory of US-American industrial research: The common roots of mass media and bureaucracy 1870–1950]</em> by Nadine Taha <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Felix Selgert (bio) </li> </ul> <em>Im Medienlabor der US-amerikanischen Industrieforschung: Die gemeinsamen Wurzeln von Massenmedien und Bürokratie 1870–1950<br/> [In the media laboratory of US-American industrial research: The common roots of mass media and bureaucracy 1870–1950]</em><br/> By Nadine Taha. Bielefeld: Transcript, 2022. Pp. 319. <p>In <em>Im Medienlabor der US-amerikanischen Industrieforschung</em>, based on her dissertation, Nadine Taha approaches American industrial research labs from a media studies perspective. In six case studies, partly based on the archives of DuPont, General Electric, and Kodak, the author aims to identify the common roots of mass and telecommunication media and the media of modern bureaucracies. The first technologies that spring to mind are the telegraph, the telephone, and the typewriter. Although all these technologies receive a mention, the six case studies refer to much less apparent technologies, including the paper-based roll film that simplified photography (ch. 2), a photographic sound recording and playback device called pallophotophone (ch. 5), a thirteen-month calendar (ch. 6), as well as cloud photography (ch. 7). Even if some of these technologies—most notably photography—fall into the mass media and bureaucratic technology category, this common feature is much less evident than for the technologies mentioned above. Taha tries to overcome this shortcoming by addressing the shared history of these media inventions and the technologies of bureaucracy (ch. 3). Here, the author refers to the control revolution (Beninger, <em>The Control Revolution</em>, 1989) and the rise of modern management (Chandler, <em>The Visible Hand</em>, 1977) as shared drivers of mass media and bureaucratic technologies. However, I read chapter 3 as if the author is more concerned with the bureaucratization of innovation in the form of industrial research departments than with the common roots of mass media and bureaucratic technologies. The idea that the bureaucratization of the innovation process can be traced back to the control revolution, the managerial revolution, and a more competitive market environment during the Progressive Era is a stimulating thought that could have been investigated more systematically.</p> <p>For Taha, the similarities between mass and bureaucratic media are also characterized by dual-use cases. An example of this is General Electric’s pallophotophone, which was aimed at the film industry and radio broadcasting but, in the end, failed in the market. However, the innovation was used in the company’s research department for a long time to pr
评论者 Im Medienlabor der US-amerikanischen Industrieforschung:Die gemeinsamen Wurzeln von Massenmedien und Bürokratie 1870-1950 [In the media laboratory der US-amerikanischen Industrieforschung:Nadine Taha Felix Selgert (bio) Im Medienlabor der US-amerikanischen Industrieforschung:Die gemeinsamen Wurzeln von Massenmedien und Bürokratie 1870-1950 [In the media laboratory der US-amerikanischen Industrieforschung:1870-1950年大众传媒与官僚机构的共同根源]纳丁-塔哈著。Bielefeld: Transcript, 2022.Pp.319.在《Im Medienlabor der US-amerikanischen Industrieforschung》一书中,纳丁-塔哈根据自己的学位论文,从媒体研究的角度探讨了美国的工业研究实验室。通过六个案例研究(部分基于杜邦公司、通用电气公司和柯达公司的档案),作者旨在找出大众和电信媒体与现代官僚机构媒体的共同根源。人们首先想到的技术是电报、电话和打字机。虽然所有这些技术都有提及,但六个案例研究还提到了一些不那么显眼的技术,包括简化了摄影的纸质卷筒胶卷(第 2 章)、被称为 pallophotophone 的摄影声音记录和播放设备(第 5 章)、13 个月的日历(第 6 章)以及云摄影(第 7 章)。即使其中一些技术--最明显的是摄影--属于大众传媒和官僚技术范畴,但这一共同特征远不如上述技术明显。塔哈试图通过探讨这些媒体发明与官僚技术的共同历史来克服这一缺陷(第 3 章)。在这里,作者提到了控制革命(Beninger,《控制革命》,1989 年)和现代管理的兴起(Chandler,《看得见的手》,1977 年),认为它们是大众传媒和官僚技术的共同驱动力。然而,我在阅读第 3 章时,感觉作者更关注的是以工业研究部门为形式的创新官僚化,而不是大众传媒和官僚技术的共同根源。创新过程的官僚化可以追溯到控制革命、管理革命以及进步时代更具竞争性的市场环境,这一观点很有启发性,本可以进行更系统的研究。在塔哈看来,大众媒体与官僚媒体的相似之处还体现在双重用途的案例上。这方面的一个例子是通用电气公司(General Electric)的苍白式留声机(pallophotophone),它的目标是电影业和无线电广播,但最终在市场上失败了。不过,这项创新在该公司的研究部门却长期用于生产内部胶片材料。但是,只有当人们认识到工业公司的研究部门主要是官僚机构时,谈论双重用途才有意义。同样令人困惑的是,塔哈认为专利主要是官僚机构和交流媒介,而不是创新 [完 1052 页] 个人和公司获得更好市场地位的契约或战略工具。不过,关于专利的案例研究(第 4 章)还是很有意思的,因为它解释了从 19 世纪 70 年代起,随着实物专利模型的逐渐废除,大公司研究部门聘用的专业发明家取代了个人发明家。这是一个有趣的命题,值得进行实证研究。另一方面,在第 2 章至第 4 章中,塔哈没有考虑到经济史上产生的有关美国专利和创新的丰富文献。例如,十多年前,经济史学家利用大量专利数据集指出,从 19 世纪 80 年代起,企业发明家开始崛起,并对发明家的职业化和创新市场的出现进行了深入研究(尼古拉斯,《独立发明在美国技术发展中的作用,1880-1930 年》,2010 年;汗和索科洛夫,《实用计划》,1993 年)。研究人员也清楚地意识到,企业一直试图最大限度地利用专利说明的法定要求来保护自己的创新不受竞争对手的侵害。经济史学家们还可以进一步证明,同一创新的信息披露深度取决于各自的专利制度(Sáiz 和 Amengual,"专利使信息披露成为可能吗?)从...
{"title":"Im Medienlabor der US-amerikanischen Industrieforschung: Die gemeinsamen Wurzeln von Massenmedien und Bürokratie 1870–1950 [In the media laboratory of US-American industrial research: The common roots of mass media and bureaucracy 1870–1950] by Nadine Taha (review)","authors":"Felix Selgert","doi":"10.1353/tech.2024.a933133","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/tech.2024.a933133","url":null,"abstract":"<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>Im Medienlabor der US-amerikanischen Industrieforschung: Die gemeinsamen Wurzeln von Massenmedien und Bürokratie 1870–1950 [In the media laboratory of US-American industrial research: The common roots of mass media and bureaucracy 1870–1950]</em> by Nadine Taha <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Felix Selgert (bio) </li> </ul> <em>Im Medienlabor der US-amerikanischen Industrieforschung: Die gemeinsamen Wurzeln von Massenmedien und Bürokratie 1870–1950<br/> [In the media laboratory of US-American industrial research: The common roots of mass media and bureaucracy 1870–1950]</em><br/> By Nadine Taha. Bielefeld: Transcript, 2022. Pp. 319. <p>In <em>Im Medienlabor der US-amerikanischen Industrieforschung</em>, based on her dissertation, Nadine Taha approaches American industrial research labs from a media studies perspective. In six case studies, partly based on the archives of DuPont, General Electric, and Kodak, the author aims to identify the common roots of mass and telecommunication media and the media of modern bureaucracies. The first technologies that spring to mind are the telegraph, the telephone, and the typewriter. Although all these technologies receive a mention, the six case studies refer to much less apparent technologies, including the paper-based roll film that simplified photography (ch. 2), a photographic sound recording and playback device called pallophotophone (ch. 5), a thirteen-month calendar (ch. 6), as well as cloud photography (ch. 7). Even if some of these technologies—most notably photography—fall into the mass media and bureaucratic technology category, this common feature is much less evident than for the technologies mentioned above. Taha tries to overcome this shortcoming by addressing the shared history of these media inventions and the technologies of bureaucracy (ch. 3). Here, the author refers to the control revolution (Beninger, <em>The Control Revolution</em>, 1989) and the rise of modern management (Chandler, <em>The Visible Hand</em>, 1977) as shared drivers of mass media and bureaucratic technologies. However, I read chapter 3 as if the author is more concerned with the bureaucratization of innovation in the form of industrial research departments than with the common roots of mass media and bureaucratic technologies. The idea that the bureaucratization of the innovation process can be traced back to the control revolution, the managerial revolution, and a more competitive market environment during the Progressive Era is a stimulating thought that could have been investigated more systematically.</p> <p>For Taha, the similarities between mass and bureaucratic media are also characterized by dual-use cases. An example of this is General Electric’s pallophotophone, which was aimed at the film industry and radio broadcasting but, in the end, failed in the market. However, the innovation was used in the company’s research department for a long time to pr","PeriodicalId":49446,"journal":{"name":"Technology and Culture","volume":"93 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2024-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141743498","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-07-19DOI: 10.1353/tech.2024.a933113
Giles Scott-Smith
<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>Hollywood’s Embassies: How Movie Theaters Projected American Power Around the Globe</em> by Ross Melnick <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Giles Scott-Smith (bio) </li> </ul> <em>Hollywood’s Embassies: How Movie Theaters Projected American Power Around the Globe</em><br/> By Ross Melnick. New York: Columbia University Press, 2022. Pp. 503. <p>This is a bold work of substantial proportions, setting out as it does to reframe our understanding of Hollywood as an overseas actor and purveyor of U.S. soft power. It does so by focusing like never before on the global network of cinemas owned and run by the major U.S. studios, instead of on the films themselves. In doing so, Melnick brings to light the all-encompassing, full-spectrum package that Hollywood delivered for nine decades to audiences around the world. The author refers early on to his work as “the first political, cultural, and industrial history of Hollywood’s foreign ownership and operation of hundreds of cinemas” (p. 2). The cinemas, with their architectural and ornamental splendor and their cornucopial abundance of consumable goods for the viewing publics, were definitely the embassies of soft power the book makes them out to be. While previous work has often focused on film production (for instance: Acland, <em>Screen Traffic</em>, 2003; Trumbour, <em>Selling Hollywood to the World</em>, 2002; Segrave, <em>American Films Abroad</em>, 1997), this title brings an empirical analysis of the structural power of film exhibition networks and the many commercial and cultural struggles that this involved.</p> <p>Twentieth Century Fox owned hundreds of cinemas across Africa and Australasia. MGM, in partnership with Loew, owned prime urban sites across Latin America. Paramount presented the heights of luxury at film palaces in <strong>[End Page 1013]</strong> Brazil and France. Warner Bros. ran an international network that spanned Eurasia. RKO, Universal, and United Artists were also involved, but to a lesser extent. The book, separated into twenty chapters spread across six continentally focused sections, aims unequivocally for full global coverage: Europe, Australasia, Latin America, the Middle East, Africa, Asia. As the ideal outlets for presenting the appealing and seemingly unlimited facets of Americana to susceptible foreign publics, the physical presence of these cinemas also elicited widespread indignation and resistance from those who objected to the overpowering omnipotence of Americanization. Hollywood—with its unmatchable stars and glamour and relentless advertising campaigns—went a long way to ensure that film was marketed and experienced in the ways that Hollywood thought it should be. Maximum experience and maximum profit were the twin goals. Not surprisingly, rival local cinema chains could not abide their obvious second-class status in their own backyards. On the other hand, armed with all the gusto and glamour Hollywood
{"title":"Hollywood's Embassies: How Movie Theaters Projected American Power Around the Globe by Ross Melnick (review)","authors":"Giles Scott-Smith","doi":"10.1353/tech.2024.a933113","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/tech.2024.a933113","url":null,"abstract":"<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>Hollywood’s Embassies: How Movie Theaters Projected American Power Around the Globe</em> by Ross Melnick <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Giles Scott-Smith (bio) </li> </ul> <em>Hollywood’s Embassies: How Movie Theaters Projected American Power Around the Globe</em><br/> By Ross Melnick. New York: Columbia University Press, 2022. Pp. 503. <p>This is a bold work of substantial proportions, setting out as it does to reframe our understanding of Hollywood as an overseas actor and purveyor of U.S. soft power. It does so by focusing like never before on the global network of cinemas owned and run by the major U.S. studios, instead of on the films themselves. In doing so, Melnick brings to light the all-encompassing, full-spectrum package that Hollywood delivered for nine decades to audiences around the world. The author refers early on to his work as “the first political, cultural, and industrial history of Hollywood’s foreign ownership and operation of hundreds of cinemas” (p. 2). The cinemas, with their architectural and ornamental splendor and their cornucopial abundance of consumable goods for the viewing publics, were definitely the embassies of soft power the book makes them out to be. While previous work has often focused on film production (for instance: Acland, <em>Screen Traffic</em>, 2003; Trumbour, <em>Selling Hollywood to the World</em>, 2002; Segrave, <em>American Films Abroad</em>, 1997), this title brings an empirical analysis of the structural power of film exhibition networks and the many commercial and cultural struggles that this involved.</p> <p>Twentieth Century Fox owned hundreds of cinemas across Africa and Australasia. MGM, in partnership with Loew, owned prime urban sites across Latin America. Paramount presented the heights of luxury at film palaces in <strong>[End Page 1013]</strong> Brazil and France. Warner Bros. ran an international network that spanned Eurasia. RKO, Universal, and United Artists were also involved, but to a lesser extent. The book, separated into twenty chapters spread across six continentally focused sections, aims unequivocally for full global coverage: Europe, Australasia, Latin America, the Middle East, Africa, Asia. As the ideal outlets for presenting the appealing and seemingly unlimited facets of Americana to susceptible foreign publics, the physical presence of these cinemas also elicited widespread indignation and resistance from those who objected to the overpowering omnipotence of Americanization. Hollywood—with its unmatchable stars and glamour and relentless advertising campaigns—went a long way to ensure that film was marketed and experienced in the ways that Hollywood thought it should be. Maximum experience and maximum profit were the twin goals. Not surprisingly, rival local cinema chains could not abide their obvious second-class status in their own backyards. On the other hand, armed with all the gusto and glamour Hollywood ","PeriodicalId":49446,"journal":{"name":"Technology and Culture","volume":"166 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2024-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141743484","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-07-19DOI: 10.1353/tech.2024.a933138
Christoph Laucht
<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>British Nuclear Weapons and the Test Ban: Squaring the Circle of Defence and Arms Control, 1974–82</em> by John Walker <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Christoph Laucht (bio) </li> </ul> <em>British Nuclear Weapons and the Test Ban: Squaring the Circle of Defence and Arms Control, 1974–82</em><br/> By John Walker. Abingdon: Routledge, 2023. Pp. 174. <p>John Walker’s latest book marks an important study of the complex relationship between nuclear weapons technology, arms control, and questions of nuclear (non)proliferation. It examines British intentions, motivations, aims, and objectives in the negotiations between the Soviet Union, the United Kingdom, and the United States over a Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty (CTBT) from 1974 to 1982. While Lorna Arnold, Richard Moore, Toshihiro Higuchi, and Walker himself in his earlier work have largely focused on the test ban debate of the 1950s leading up to the 1963 Partial Test Ban Treaty, <em>British Nuclear Weapons and the Test Ban</em> sheds light on a thus far neglected aspect of nuclear arms control, or what Walker also refers to as “the Holy Grail of arms control since the 1950s” (p. 1). The author pays particular attention to the likely impacts of a CTBT on the reliability and safety of the United Kingdom’s nuclear arsenal.</p> <p>Apart from an introduction (ch. 1) and conclusion (ch. 6), <em>British Nuclear Weapons and the Test Ban</em> contains four main chapters. For heuristic purposes, the main body opens with an overview of the CTBT negotiations that took place in Geneva between 1977 and 1982 (ch. 2). During the talks, the Callaghan and Thatcher governments faced a fundamental dilemma: on the one hand, they aspired to a CTBT as an international measure to reduce nuclear stockpiles. On the other, they worried that a test ban might obstruct designing new warheads and jeopardize the reliability and safety of the existing British stockpile. Walker reminds us that this quandary resembled the situation that the Macmillan government encountered between 1954 <strong>[End Page 1061]</strong> and 1958 when the United Kingdom sought to complete its thermonuclear weapons program ahead of a moratorium on testing coming into effect. At the same time, practical issues around verification of a CTBT through National Seismic Stations added complexity to the negotiations.</p> <p>The three chapters that follow focus more specifically on key themes concerning British interests in the talks. From 1974, it became apparent that the United Kingdom required continued nuclear testing on the Nevada Test Site in the United States to proceed with the development of hardened warheads for the Chevaline upgrade of the Polaris submarine-launched ballistic missiles (SLBMs; ch. 3). Simultaneously, testing was needed to ensure the safety and reliability of the United Kingdom’s stockpile (ch. 4). As Walker shows, British dependence on the United States—both techno
{"title":"British Nuclear Weapons and the Test Ban: Squaring the Circle of Defence and Arms Control, 1974–82 by John Walker (review)","authors":"Christoph Laucht","doi":"10.1353/tech.2024.a933138","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/tech.2024.a933138","url":null,"abstract":"<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>British Nuclear Weapons and the Test Ban: Squaring the Circle of Defence and Arms Control, 1974–82</em> by John Walker <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Christoph Laucht (bio) </li> </ul> <em>British Nuclear Weapons and the Test Ban: Squaring the Circle of Defence and Arms Control, 1974–82</em><br/> By John Walker. Abingdon: Routledge, 2023. Pp. 174. <p>John Walker’s latest book marks an important study of the complex relationship between nuclear weapons technology, arms control, and questions of nuclear (non)proliferation. It examines British intentions, motivations, aims, and objectives in the negotiations between the Soviet Union, the United Kingdom, and the United States over a Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty (CTBT) from 1974 to 1982. While Lorna Arnold, Richard Moore, Toshihiro Higuchi, and Walker himself in his earlier work have largely focused on the test ban debate of the 1950s leading up to the 1963 Partial Test Ban Treaty, <em>British Nuclear Weapons and the Test Ban</em> sheds light on a thus far neglected aspect of nuclear arms control, or what Walker also refers to as “the Holy Grail of arms control since the 1950s” (p. 1). The author pays particular attention to the likely impacts of a CTBT on the reliability and safety of the United Kingdom’s nuclear arsenal.</p> <p>Apart from an introduction (ch. 1) and conclusion (ch. 6), <em>British Nuclear Weapons and the Test Ban</em> contains four main chapters. For heuristic purposes, the main body opens with an overview of the CTBT negotiations that took place in Geneva between 1977 and 1982 (ch. 2). During the talks, the Callaghan and Thatcher governments faced a fundamental dilemma: on the one hand, they aspired to a CTBT as an international measure to reduce nuclear stockpiles. On the other, they worried that a test ban might obstruct designing new warheads and jeopardize the reliability and safety of the existing British stockpile. Walker reminds us that this quandary resembled the situation that the Macmillan government encountered between 1954 <strong>[End Page 1061]</strong> and 1958 when the United Kingdom sought to complete its thermonuclear weapons program ahead of a moratorium on testing coming into effect. At the same time, practical issues around verification of a CTBT through National Seismic Stations added complexity to the negotiations.</p> <p>The three chapters that follow focus more specifically on key themes concerning British interests in the talks. From 1974, it became apparent that the United Kingdom required continued nuclear testing on the Nevada Test Site in the United States to proceed with the development of hardened warheads for the Chevaline upgrade of the Polaris submarine-launched ballistic missiles (SLBMs; ch. 3). Simultaneously, testing was needed to ensure the safety and reliability of the United Kingdom’s stockpile (ch. 4). As Walker shows, British dependence on the United States—both techno","PeriodicalId":49446,"journal":{"name":"Technology and Culture","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2024-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141743502","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}