Surgeon-Journal of the Royal Colleges of Surgeons of Edinburgh and Ireland最新文献

Objective

To compare pelvic floor muscle and organ structures in women with and without hemorrhoidal disease (HD) using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

Material and methods

Pelvic MRI measurements and computer-based medical records of women diagnosed with HD between January 2018 and March 2021 were analyzed. Parameters including pubococcygeal distance, puborectal distance, posterior anorectal angle, obturator internus muscle area, presence of levator ani muscle defect, genital hiatus length, vaginal length, uterocervical angle, cervix-upper vagina angle, and cervix-middle vagina angle were evaluated. The control group consisted of women without HD, matched for age and body mass index.

Results

Puborectal hiatus distance was higher in the HD group (59.2 ​± ​8.7 ​mm vs. 55.5 ​± ​7.1 ​mm, p ​= ​0.03). Similarly, the distance to the M line was greater in the HD group (18.3 ​± ​4.8 ​mm vs. 16 ​± ​4.6 ​mm, p ​= ​0.04). Obturator internus muscle area was found to be lower in the HD group compared to the non-HD group (1721 ​± ​291.4 ​mm² vs. 1897.5 ​± ​352.5 ​mm², p ​= ​0.02). Additionally, the presence of unilateral levator ani muscle defect was higher in HD patients (p ​= ​0.03). There was a negative correlation between birthweight and obturator internus muscle area (r ​= ​−0.388, p ​= ​0.02), and a positive correlation with M line distance (r ​= ​0.344, p ​= ​0.04).

Conclusion

Levator ani muscle defects and obturator internus muscle area, indicators of pelvic floor dysfunction, are more common in patients with hemorrhoidal disease.

Background

Climate change has been identified by the World Health Organization (WHO) as the greatest existing threat to human health. Given the direct exposure of the upper aerodigestive system to pollutants, patients in otolaryngology are at high risk for increased disease burden in the setting of climate change and worsening air quality. Given this and the environmental impact of surgical care, it is essential for surgeons to understand their role in addressing climate health through quality-driven clinical initiatives, education, advocacy, and research.

Methods

A state-of-the-art review was performed of the existing literature on the otolaryngologic health impacts of climate change and environmental sustainability efforts in surgery with specific attention to studies in otolaryngology – head and neck surgery.

Findings

Climate variables including heat and air pollution are associated with increased incidence of allergic rhinitis, chronic rhinosinusitis and head and neck cancer. A number of studies have shown that sustainability initiatives in otolaryngology are safe and provide direct cost benefit.

Conclusion

Surgeons have the opportunity to lead on climate health and sustainability to address the public health burden of climate change.

Rising global temperatures will have a radical impact on the environment where global warming is associated with weather extremes such as thunderstorms and droughts which can affect the regional ecosystems. The healthcare sector is a major emitter of greenhouse gasses. Within healthcare, the outpatient clinic is responsible for a considerable sum of emissions. These can be organized under scopes 1, 2 and 3 as described in the Greenhouse Gas Protocol where scope 1 accounts for direct emissions from healthcare facilities, scope 2 is emissions from purchased electricity and scope 3 is indirect emissions including procurement and waste.

Emissions and mitigation strategies from the surgical outpatient clinic are outlined under each scope of the Greenhouse Gas Protocol. These include using insulation materials, renovating or building new facilities, incorporating renewable energy sources and utilizing more efficient appliances.

Telehealth and virtual clinics have been shown to be an effective method of delivering care while avoiding the combustion of fossil fuels to facilitate patient transport. In addition, virtual set-ups are cost effective and have not been proven to compromise patient safety when implemented correctly.

Introduction

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Background and objectives

Acute appendicitis is one of the most commonly encountered surgical emergencies on a global level. Due to the requirement of an immediate clinical diagnosis and the presence of limited resources, clinicians and diagnosticians refer to scoring systems to diagnose this condition, among which Alvarado and Tzanakis scoring systems are widely used. This meta-analysis aims to compare the diagnostic accuracy of these two systems.

Methods

We searched PubMed, Google Scholar, and SCOPUS databases. All studies that reported diagnostic parameters of Alvarado and Tzanakis scores in patients with suspected acute appendicitis were selected. Diagnostic values such as sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and diagnostic accuracy were extracted from the selected studies and statistical analysis was performed with Meta Disc 1.4 software. Quality assessment of the selected studies was performed using the QUADAS-2 and QUADAS-C tools. Fourteen studies were included in our meta-analysis which enrolled 2235 patients.

Results

The overall sensitivity of the Tzanakis score was calculated as 0.86 (95% CI; 0.84-00.87) while the specificity was 0.73 (95% CI; 0.69–0.78). In addition, the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.9261 (SE; 0.0169) and the diagnostic Odds Ratio (OR) was 22.52 (95% CI; 9.47–53.56). The pooled sensitivity of Alvarado score was 0.67 (95% CI; 0.65–0.69) and the specificity was 0.74 (95% CI; 0.69–0.79). Moreover, the area under the curve (AUC) of the Alvarado score was 0.7389 (SE; 0.0489) and the diagnostic Odds Ratio was 4.92 (95% CI; 2.48–9.75).

Interpretation and conclusion

The Tzanakis scoring system has a higher sensitivity, area under the curve, and diagnostic odds ratio when compared to the Alvarado score. However, the Alvarado score has a marginally better specificity making it more reliable in excluding acute appendicitis.

Introduction

Medical tourism refers to the process of patients travelling outside of their native country to undergo elective surgical procedures and is a rapidly expanding healthcare phenomenon [1–3]. Whilst a multitude of established Private Healthcare Providers (PHPs) offer cosmetic surgical procedures within the United Kingdom (UK), a growing number of patients are opting to travel outside of the UK to undergo cosmetic surgery.

Aim

To assess the number of patients presenting to the Canniesburn Plastic Surgery Unit, with cosmetic surgery tourism complications, from outside of the UK, and the associated costs to NHS Scotland over a five-year period.

Methods

A retrospective case review of a prospectively maintained trauma database, which records all acute referrals, was undertaken analysing patients referred from January 1st 2019 to December 31st 2023 inclusive.

Results

81 patients presented over five years with complications of cosmetic surgery tourism. The most common presenting complaints were wound dehiscence (49.4%) or wound infection (24.7%). The total cost to NHS Scotland was £755,559.68 with an average of £9327.90 per patient.

Conclusion

This is the largest single centre cohort of cosmetic surgery tourism complications reported within the NHS to date; with rates on the rise, demand grows for increased patient information regarding healthcare tourism risks, a national consensus on the extent of NHS management and urgent international collaboration with policymakers is required to address this issue across borders.