Pub Date : 2022-01-01DOI: 10.1080/00332747.2022.2062660
Yael Cohen-Chazani, Michal Lavidor, Eva Gilboa-Schechtman, David Roe, Ilanit Hasson-Ohayon
Objective: The current meta-analysis investigates the efficacy of psychotherapy during psychiatric hospitalization and examines the moderating role of diagnosis and therapeutic approach.
Methods: We conducted systematic searches in literature databases, including PubMed, PsycInfo, and Google Scholar. In total, 37 samples were included for the meta-analysis with a total of 4,443 patients. The primary outcome was the standardized mean differences in clinical status measured by symptomatic and functional measures.
Results: The meta-analysis of 22 samples without a control group resulted in the upper end of the medium effect size for the overall effect of treatment during psychiatric hospitalization that included psychotherapy (k = 22, Cohen's d = 0.70, and 95% Cl 0.36 to 1.04). The meta-analysis of 15 samples with a control group resulted in the upper end of the low effect size for the contribution of psychotherapy to the improvement of patients' clinical status measured by symptomatic and functional measures (k = 15, Cohen's d = 0.43, and 95% CI 0.06 to 0.81). No significant effects were uncovered for psychotherapy orientation. Diagnosis was found to moderate the contribution of psychotherapy in an inpatient setting to the improvement of patients' clinical condition.
Conclusion: Psychotherapy during psychiatric hospitalization may be an effective treatment. Across the various samples, psychotherapy has a moderate effect on the reduction of psychiatric symptoms beyond the overall effect of ward treatment.
目的:本荟萃分析探讨心理治疗在精神病住院期间的疗效,并探讨诊断和治疗方法的调节作用。方法:系统检索PubMed、PsycInfo、Google Scholar等文献数据库。总共有37个样本被纳入meta分析,共4443名患者。主要结果是通过症状和功能测量测量的临床状态的标准化平均差异。结果:在没有对照组的22个样本的荟萃分析中,包括心理治疗在内的精神科住院期间治疗的总体效果达到了中等效应量的上限(k = 22, Cohen’s d = 0.70, 95% Cl = 0.36至1.04)。对15个样本和对照组进行荟萃分析,结果显示心理治疗对通过症状和功能测量测量的患者临床状态改善的贡献达到低效应量的上限(k = 15, Cohen’s d = 0.43, 95% CI 0.06 ~ 0.81)。没有发现心理治疗取向的显著影响。诊断被发现缓和了住院患者的心理治疗对患者临床状况改善的贡献。结论:精神科住院期间的心理治疗可能是有效的治疗方法。在不同的样本中,心理治疗对精神病症状的减轻有中等效果,超出了病房治疗的总体效果。
{"title":"Meta-Analysis of the Effect of Psychotherapy in an Inpatient Setting: Examining the Moderating Role of Diagnosis and Therapeutic Approach.","authors":"Yael Cohen-Chazani, Michal Lavidor, Eva Gilboa-Schechtman, David Roe, Ilanit Hasson-Ohayon","doi":"10.1080/00332747.2022.2062660","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00332747.2022.2062660","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The current meta-analysis investigates the efficacy of psychotherapy during psychiatric hospitalization and examines the moderating role of diagnosis and therapeutic approach.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted systematic searches in literature databases, including PubMed, PsycInfo, and Google Scholar. In total, 37 samples were included for the meta-analysis with a total of 4,443 patients. The primary outcome was the standardized mean differences in clinical status measured by symptomatic and functional measures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The meta-analysis of 22 samples without a control group resulted in the upper end of the medium effect size for the overall effect of treatment during psychiatric hospitalization that included psychotherapy (k = 22, Cohen's d = 0.70, and 95% Cl 0.36 to 1.04). The meta-analysis of 15 samples with a control group resulted in the upper end of the low effect size for the contribution of psychotherapy to the improvement of patients' clinical status measured by symptomatic and functional measures (k = 15, Cohen's d = 0.43, and 95% CI 0.06 to 0.81). No significant effects were uncovered for psychotherapy orientation. Diagnosis was found to moderate the contribution of psychotherapy in an inpatient setting to the improvement of patients' clinical condition.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Psychotherapy during psychiatric hospitalization may be an effective treatment. Across the various samples, psychotherapy has a moderate effect on the reduction of psychiatric symptoms beyond the overall effect of ward treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":49656,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatry-Interpersonal and Biological Processes","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10727363","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Objectives: Our main hypothesis in this study was that patients with social anxiety disorder (SAD) and comorbid attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) had lower empathy levels than those without ADHD. Also, after controlling for the severity of SAD and depression, we hypothesized that ADHD symptoms contributed to lower levels of empathy in SAD patients.Methods: 72 patients (46 females, 32 males) with SAD between the ages of 18-65 years were divided into two groups as those with (n = 32) and those without ADHD (n = 40). Participants were evaluated using the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale (LSAS), Turgay's Adult Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder, Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), and Empathy Quotient. In this study, Mann Whitney-U test, Spearman correlation test, logistic and multiple regression analysis were used.Results: Education level (U = 371.5, p = .002) and empathy scores (U = 259.5, p < .0001) of SAD patients with ADHD were significantly lower than those without ADHD. BDI (U = 206.5, p < .0001), LSAS total (U = 454.5, p = .036), fear (U = 457.0, p = .038), and avoidance scores (U = 453.0, p = .034) were higher in SAD patients with ADHD than those without ADHD. Low levels of empathy (B = - 0.119, Exp(B) = 0.895, p = .014) and high severity of current depression (B = 0.119, Exp(B) = 1.127, p = .001) were significantly associated with comorbidity between SAD and ADHD. ADHD-inattention (β = -0.369, Exp(B) = -0.541, p = .004), and depression (β = -0.262, Exp(B) = -0.212, p = .036) negatively predicted empathy levels.Conclusions: Our findings may provide some evidence for the contribution of ADHD-inattention and depression to poor empathy in SAD patients. Therefore, it is recommended that symptoms of ADHD-inattention and depression should be carefully evaluated in SAD patients with low empathy.
目的:本研究的主要假设是社交焦虑障碍(SAD)合并注意缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)患者的共情水平低于未合并注意缺陷多动障碍的患者。此外,在控制了SAD和抑郁的严重程度后,我们假设ADHD症状导致SAD患者的同理心水平较低。方法:将年龄在18 ~ 65岁之间的SAD患者72例(女46例,男32例)分为有ADHD组(n = 32)和无ADHD组(n = 40)。采用Liebowitz社交焦虑量表(LSAS)、Turgay成人注意缺陷/多动障碍量表、Beck抑郁量表(BDI)和共情商对参与者进行评估。本研究采用Mann Whitney-U检验、Spearman相关检验、logistic及多元回归分析。结果:SAD合并ADHD患者的教育水平(U = 371.5, p = 0.002)、共情得分(U = 259.5, p = 0.036)、恐惧得分(U = 457.0, p = 0.038)、回避得分(U = 453.0, p = 0.034)均高于非ADHD患者。低水平的共情(B = - 0.119, Exp(B) = 0.895, p = 0.014)和高程度的当前抑郁(B = 0.119, Exp(B) = 1.127, p = 0.001)与SAD和ADHD的共病显著相关。注意力不集中(β = -0.369, Exp(B) = -0.541, p = 0.004)和抑郁(β = -0.262, Exp(B) = -0.212, p = 0.036)负向预测共情水平。结论:本研究结果可能为adhd -注意力不集中和抑郁对SAD患者共情能力差的影响提供一些证据。因此,我们建议在低共情的SAD患者中仔细评估adhd -注意力不集中和抑郁的症状。
{"title":"Empathy in Social Anxiety Disorder: The Association with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder.","authors":"Didem Umutlu, Cagdas Oyku Memis, Yasam Umutlu, Doga Sevincok, Levent Sevincok","doi":"10.1080/00332747.2021.1952034","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00332747.2021.1952034","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Objectives</i>: Our main hypothesis in this study was that patients with social anxiety disorder (SAD) and comorbid attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) had lower empathy levels than those without ADHD. Also, after controlling for the severity of SAD and depression, we hypothesized that ADHD symptoms contributed to lower levels of empathy in SAD patients.<i>Methods</i>: 72 patients (46 females, 32 males) with SAD between the ages of 18-65 years were divided into two groups as those with (n = 32) and those without ADHD (n = 40). Participants were evaluated using the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale (LSAS), Turgay's Adult Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder, Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), and Empathy Quotient. In this study, Mann Whitney-U test, Spearman correlation test, logistic and multiple regression analysis were used.<i>Results</i>: Education level (U = 371.5, <i>p</i> = .002) and empathy scores (U = 259.5, <i>p</i> < .0001) of SAD patients with ADHD were significantly lower than those without ADHD. BDI (U = 206.5, <i>p</i> < .0001), LSAS total (U = 454.5, <i>p</i> = .036), fear (U = 457.0, <i>p</i> = .038), and avoidance scores (U = 453.0, <i>p</i> = .034) were higher in SAD patients with ADHD than those without ADHD. Low levels of empathy (B = - 0.119, Exp(B) = 0.895, <i>p</i> = .014) and high severity of current depression (B = 0.119, Exp(B) = 1.127, <i>p</i> = .001) were significantly associated with comorbidity between SAD and ADHD. ADHD-inattention (β = -0.369, Exp(B) = -0.541, <i>p</i> = .004), and depression (β = -0.262, Exp(B) = -0.212, <i>p</i> = .036) negatively predicted empathy levels.<i>Conclusions</i>: Our findings may provide some evidence for the contribution of ADHD-inattention and depression to poor empathy in SAD patients. Therefore, it is recommended that symptoms of ADHD-inattention and depression should be carefully evaluated in SAD patients with low empathy.</p>","PeriodicalId":49656,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatry-Interpersonal and Biological Processes","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00332747.2021.1952034","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39267880","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-01-01Epub Date: 2020-09-18DOI: 10.1080/00332747.2020.1800291
Emily Weitzel, Caroline Hopper, Del Herridge
Objective: Adult gang members have higher substance misuse and Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACE) prevalence than non-gang involved individuals. The authors aimed to understand UK gang membership demographics and estimate substance misuse and ACE prevalence among a community-based sample of children and young people (CYP) contrasting three groups; gang members, periphery and non-gang involved.Method: The authors used the 2006 Offending, Crime and Justice Survey (OCJS) cross-sectional dataset, containing gang involvement, ACE exposure and substance misuse data, sampling 2,443 individuals aged 13-17 years. Gang membership was self-identified. Gang periphery was CYP identifying as gang involved according to the Eurogang Youth survey questionnaire, but not self-identifying as members. Other CYP were non-gang involved.Results: Gang periphery participants were significantly more likely to misuse all substance types than non-gang involved CYP. The substance misuse likelihood was greatest for gang peripherals, then members, then non-gang involved. Gang periphery and members were significantly more likely to have been a victim of serious assault, less serious assault, any assault, any violence and to have committed any violent act in the last year than non-gang involved.Conclusions: This is the first study comparing ACE exposure and substance misuse prevalence among the UK, community-based CYP sample. Current research highlights younger children with complex needs, including girls, risk gang involvement and requires tailored support to enable safe exit from gangs. Factors relating to gang involvement, ACEs and substance misuse are interlinked and complex, demanding a holistic approach to support across education, children's social services, health and criminal justice settings.
{"title":"Adolescent Gangs: Substance Misuse and Exposure to Adverse Childhood Experiences.","authors":"Emily Weitzel, Caroline Hopper, Del Herridge","doi":"10.1080/00332747.2020.1800291","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00332747.2020.1800291","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Objective</i>: Adult gang members have higher substance misuse and Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACE) prevalence than non-gang involved individuals. The authors aimed to understand UK gang membership demographics and estimate substance misuse and ACE prevalence among a community-based sample of children and young people (CYP) contrasting three groups; gang members, periphery and non-gang involved.<i>Method</i>: The authors used the 2006 Offending, Crime and Justice Survey (OCJS) cross-sectional dataset, containing gang involvement, ACE exposure and substance misuse data, sampling 2,443 individuals aged 13-17 years. Gang membership was self-identified. Gang periphery was CYP identifying as gang involved according to the Eurogang Youth survey questionnaire, but not self-identifying as members. Other CYP were non-gang involved.<i>Results</i>: Gang periphery participants were significantly more likely to misuse all substance types than non-gang involved CYP. The substance misuse likelihood was greatest for gang peripherals, then members, then non-gang involved. Gang periphery and members were significantly more likely to have been a victim of serious assault, less serious assault, any assault, any violence and to have committed any violent act in the last year than non-gang involved.<i>Conclusions</i>: This is the first study comparing ACE exposure and substance misuse prevalence among the UK, community-based CYP sample. Current research highlights younger children with complex needs, including girls, risk gang involvement and requires tailored support to enable safe exit from gangs. Factors relating to gang involvement, ACEs and substance misuse are interlinked and complex, demanding a holistic approach to support across education, children's social services, health and criminal justice settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":49656,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatry-Interpersonal and Biological Processes","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00332747.2020.1800291","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"38493929","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-01-01Epub Date: 2020-12-01DOI: 10.1080/00332747.2020.1843325
Milton Viederman
This paper illustrates the beneficial effect of a positive benevolent transference in the development of an internalized representation of the therapist/analyst in a variety of patients in psychodynamic treatments ranging from consultation to psychoanalysis itself. This is described in patient presentations. In those who have had substantial early nurturant life experience and now find themselves in a dysphoric state due to crisis, the effect lies in the transference reactivation of these positive object relations that relieve their distress. In those who have been deprived of such early experience, the positive transference may emerge during the intensive work of psychoanalysis and may lead to the internalization of a new positive object representation of the analyst generated in the transference that persists after termination of treatment. In both of these situations, the patient discovers a sense of greater harmony with self and the world. The special conditions that permit and facilitate this process are described since this does not occur in all psychodynamic interventions.
{"title":"The Internalization of a Representation of the Therapist as an Element in Psychotherapeutic Gain.","authors":"Milton Viederman","doi":"10.1080/00332747.2020.1843325","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00332747.2020.1843325","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This paper illustrates the beneficial effect of a positive benevolent transference in the development of an internalized representation of the therapist/analyst in a variety of patients in psychodynamic treatments ranging from consultation to psychoanalysis itself. This is described in patient presentations. In those who have had substantial early nurturant life experience and now find themselves in a dysphoric state due to crisis, the effect lies in the transference reactivation of these positive object relations that relieve their distress. In those who have been deprived of such early experience, the positive transference may emerge during the intensive work of psychoanalysis and may lead to the internalization of a new positive object representation of the analyst generated in the transference that persists after termination of treatment. In both of these situations, the patient discovers a sense of greater harmony with self and the world. The special conditions that permit and facilitate this process are described since this does not occur in all psychodynamic interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":49656,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatry-Interpersonal and Biological Processes","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00332747.2020.1843325","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"38322779","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-01-01Epub Date: 2021-08-04DOI: 10.1080/00332747.2021.1907869
J Christopher Perry, J Christopher Fowler
Objectives: Individuals with treatment-refractory disorders have high comorbidity. There is little information on whether recovery is possible and how long it might require. We focused on the individual's recovery using a broad measure of psychopathology, regardless of the variety of disorders present.Methods: We recruited 226 adults [mean age 31.0, SD = 10.3; 75.2% female] entering residential treatment for treatment-refractory disorders to delineate their course and outcome. Individuals received periodic Longitudinal Interval Follow-along Evaluation interviews for symptoms and functioning variables for up to 14 years. Periodic psychodynamic and relationship vignette interviews were rated with the Psychodynamic Conflict Rating Scales (PCRS) for a subgroup of 54 subjects. Outcome variables included modeled rates of change, final scores, time to recovery, and time to attaining healthy adaptive functioning, using Kaplan-Meier estimates from time-to-event analyses.Results: Recovery of PCRS Pathological Functioning occurred in 12 (22%) of 54 subjects rated: median time-to-recovery = 11.63 years (CI: 9.64- upper number not calculable). Eight (14.81%) subjects also developed healthy adaptive functioning, with the time-to-attainment for the first quartile at 10.95 years (CI: 7.87 - upper bound not calculable). Recovery from psychopathology was significantly associated with a median percentage recovered in the domains of symptoms (64.29%), functioning (87.50%), and psychodynamic functioning (50%). Although attaining healthy adaptive functioning was less common, it was highly associated with already achieving recovery from dynamic psychopathology, [OR = 57.40, CI 5.80 - 567.83, p = .0001].Conclusions: These results provided convergent validation of recovery in psychodynamic psychopathology. Some recovered individuals also attained healthy adaptive functioning, which took somewhat longer.
目的:难治性疾病患者有很高的合并症。关于是否有可能恢复以及可能需要多长时间的信息很少。我们使用广泛的精神病理学指标来关注个体的康复,而不考虑存在的各种障碍。方法:招募226名成人[平均年龄31.0岁,SD = 10.3;(75.2%女性)因难治性疾病进入住院治疗,以确定其病程和结果。个体接受长达14年的症状和功能变量的定期纵向间隔随访评估访谈。采用心理动力冲突评定量表(PCRS)对54名受试者进行定期心理动力和关系小插曲访谈。结果变量包括模型变化率、最终得分、恢复时间和获得健康适应功能的时间,使用时间到事件分析的Kaplan-Meier估计。结果:54名受试者中有12名(22%)出现PCRS病理功能恢复:中位恢复时间= 11.63年(CI: 9.64-上限无法计算)。8名(14.81%)受试者还发展出健康的适应功能,第一个四分位数的实现时间为10.95年(CI: 7.87 -上限无法计算)。精神病理的恢复与症状(64.29%)、功能(87.50%)和精神动力功能(50%)的中位数百分比显著相关。虽然获得健康的适应功能不太常见,但与已经从动态精神病理中恢复高度相关,[OR = 57.40, CI 5.80 - 567.83, p = 0.0001]。结论:这些结果为心理动力学精神病理学的康复提供了一致性验证。一些康复的个体也获得了健康的适应功能,这需要更长的时间。
{"title":"A Naturalistic Study of Time to Recovery in Adults with Treatment-refractory Disorders.","authors":"J Christopher Perry, J Christopher Fowler","doi":"10.1080/00332747.2021.1907869","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00332747.2021.1907869","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Objectives</i>: Individuals with treatment-refractory disorders have high comorbidity. There is little information on whether recovery is possible and how long it might require. We focused on the individual's recovery using a broad measure of psychopathology, regardless of the variety of disorders present.<i>Methods</i>: We recruited 226 adults [mean age 31.0, SD = 10.3; 75.2% female] entering residential treatment for treatment-refractory disorders to delineate their course and outcome. Individuals received periodic Longitudinal Interval Follow-along Evaluation interviews for symptoms and functioning variables for up to 14 years. Periodic psychodynamic and relationship vignette interviews were rated with the Psychodynamic Conflict Rating Scales (PCRS) for a subgroup of 54 subjects. Outcome variables included modeled rates of change, final scores, time to recovery, and time to attaining healthy adaptive functioning, using Kaplan-Meier estimates from time-to-event analyses.<i>Results</i>: Recovery of PCRS Pathological Functioning occurred in 12 (22%) of 54 subjects rated: median time-to-recovery = 11.63 years (CI: 9.64- upper number not calculable). Eight (14.81%) subjects also developed healthy adaptive functioning, with the time-to-attainment for the first quartile at 10.95 years (CI: 7.87 - upper bound not calculable). Recovery from psychopathology was significantly associated with a median percentage recovered in the domains of symptoms (64.29%), functioning (87.50%), and psychodynamic functioning (50%). Although attaining healthy adaptive functioning was less common, it was highly associated with already achieving recovery from dynamic psychopathology, [OR = 57.40, CI 5.80 - 567.83, <i>p</i> = .0001].<i>Conclusions</i>: These results provided convergent validation of recovery in psychodynamic psychopathology. Some recovered individuals also attained healthy adaptive functioning, which took somewhat longer.</p>","PeriodicalId":49656,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatry-Interpersonal and Biological Processes","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00332747.2021.1907869","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39274331","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-01-01DOI: 10.1080/00332747.2021.1958566
Edward K Silberman
In their 1949 paper, “The Empathic Responses” (Cottrell & Dymond, 1949) the authors call attention to empathy as a neglected concept in psychiatry and highlight the work of Harry Stack Sullivan as seminal to understanding its proper place. Empathy has long had a checkered career in psychiatry and psychotherapy, having been looked upon as largely irrelevant in some schools (Havens, 1973) and centrally essential in others (Rogers, 1957). Psychiatry’s struggles with empathy begin with the difficulty of agreeing about the meaning of the concept (Batson, 2009). A dictionary definition of empathy as “The ability to understand and share the feelings of another” (Oxford Languages) provides as good a general orientation as any to the term. This essay attempts to clarify some of the complexities of empathy in psychotherapy, leaving aside its more general social, philosophical, and moral implications. For more general discussions, an excellent review by Elliott et al. (2011) deals with research on empathy in psychotherapy and one by Steuber (2018) with philosophical and social aspects of empathy. EMPATHIC UNDERSTANDING
{"title":"Empathy in Psychotherapy: What Is It and What Else Do We Need?","authors":"Edward K Silberman","doi":"10.1080/00332747.2021.1958566","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00332747.2021.1958566","url":null,"abstract":"In their 1949 paper, “The Empathic Responses” (Cottrell & Dymond, 1949) the authors call attention to empathy as a neglected concept in psychiatry and highlight the work of Harry Stack Sullivan as seminal to understanding its proper place. Empathy has long had a checkered career in psychiatry and psychotherapy, having been looked upon as largely irrelevant in some schools (Havens, 1973) and centrally essential in others (Rogers, 1957). Psychiatry’s struggles with empathy begin with the difficulty of agreeing about the meaning of the concept (Batson, 2009). A dictionary definition of empathy as “The ability to understand and share the feelings of another” (Oxford Languages) provides as good a general orientation as any to the term. This essay attempts to clarify some of the complexities of empathy in psychotherapy, leaving aside its more general social, philosophical, and moral implications. For more general discussions, an excellent review by Elliott et al. (2011) deals with research on empathy in psychotherapy and one by Steuber (2018) with philosophical and social aspects of empathy. EMPATHIC UNDERSTANDING","PeriodicalId":49656,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatry-Interpersonal and Biological Processes","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39555804","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-01-01DOI: 10.1080/00332747.2021.2005421
Stevan E Hobfoll
In our 2007 article, Hobfoll, Watson and colleagues advanced a theoretical overview of the empirical evidence supporting immediate and mid-term mass trauma intervention in our paper, ‘Five essential elements of immediate and mid-term mass trauma intervention’ (Hobfoll et al., 2007). Perhaps because the evidence of anything resembling clinical trials was nearly non-existent, the authors chose another direction of logic. Specifically, we identified five essential elements that studies had found critical in predicting favorable outcomes in situations of mass casualty ranging from war, to terrorist attack, to mass shootings, and disasters. There was strong support for interventions to promote (1) a sense of safety, (2) calming, (3) a sense of selfand community efficacy, (4) connectedness, and (5) hope as naturalistic studies found these to be tied to more positive outcomes including lower levels of PTSD and depression, lower levels of physical, post-traumtic distress, traumatic growth, and functional adjustment. Further, these associations were tied to better outcomes on the individual, familial, and community levels of analyses. The impact of the five principles, as they have become known, has been remarkable. At the date of this writing, the paper has been cited 1319 times, according to Google Scholar (6-21-21). Perhaps more to the point of its importance, the five principles were used as a framework during the COVID-19 pandemic by hundreds of websites, including government authorities, NGOs, and psychosocial support organizations around the world. These included, guiding managing the stress related to the COVID-19 pandemic on the national level by the National Center for PTSD (2020), the Indian Council of Medical Research for patients and families with COVID-19 (2021) and New Zealand Red Cross (2020), as exemplars; supporting the well-being of the school community (National Educational Psychological Services, 2020), supporting children and adolescents during the COVID-19 Pandemic (Brymer, 2020) returning to school (Moore, 2020; Oxfordshire Schools, 2021), support for medical staff (Nadler et al., 2020). Literally, thousands of websites were informed by and credited the five principles as foundational in their strategy to COVID-19. At this juncture, rather than reveling in the clear success and contribution of the five principles paper, it is time to step back and assess where we were less successful, and where we might more humbly admit we have
{"title":"Five Principles in Context: We Have Been Blind to Ecological Principles and Politics.","authors":"Stevan E Hobfoll","doi":"10.1080/00332747.2021.2005421","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00332747.2021.2005421","url":null,"abstract":"In our 2007 article, Hobfoll, Watson and colleagues advanced a theoretical overview of the empirical evidence supporting immediate and mid-term mass trauma intervention in our paper, ‘Five essential elements of immediate and mid-term mass trauma intervention’ (Hobfoll et al., 2007). Perhaps because the evidence of anything resembling clinical trials was nearly non-existent, the authors chose another direction of logic. Specifically, we identified five essential elements that studies had found critical in predicting favorable outcomes in situations of mass casualty ranging from war, to terrorist attack, to mass shootings, and disasters. There was strong support for interventions to promote (1) a sense of safety, (2) calming, (3) a sense of selfand community efficacy, (4) connectedness, and (5) hope as naturalistic studies found these to be tied to more positive outcomes including lower levels of PTSD and depression, lower levels of physical, post-traumtic distress, traumatic growth, and functional adjustment. Further, these associations were tied to better outcomes on the individual, familial, and community levels of analyses. The impact of the five principles, as they have become known, has been remarkable. At the date of this writing, the paper has been cited 1319 times, according to Google Scholar (6-21-21). Perhaps more to the point of its importance, the five principles were used as a framework during the COVID-19 pandemic by hundreds of websites, including government authorities, NGOs, and psychosocial support organizations around the world. These included, guiding managing the stress related to the COVID-19 pandemic on the national level by the National Center for PTSD (2020), the Indian Council of Medical Research for patients and families with COVID-19 (2021) and New Zealand Red Cross (2020), as exemplars; supporting the well-being of the school community (National Educational Psychological Services, 2020), supporting children and adolescents during the COVID-19 Pandemic (Brymer, 2020) returning to school (Moore, 2020; Oxfordshire Schools, 2021), support for medical staff (Nadler et al., 2020). Literally, thousands of websites were informed by and credited the five principles as foundational in their strategy to COVID-19. At this juncture, rather than reveling in the clear success and contribution of the five principles paper, it is time to step back and assess where we were less successful, and where we might more humbly admit we have","PeriodicalId":49656,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatry-Interpersonal and Biological Processes","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39935936","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-01-01DOI: 10.1080/00332747.2021.2005379
Robert J Ursano
Psychological care in times of disaster has changed substantially in the past 20 years. In acute care, Psychological First Aid (PFA), published by Hobfoll et al. in 2007 in PSYCHIATRY, now forms the core of early postdisaster response. These same principles are fundamental to nearly all supportive psychotherapy. Importantly now, during the COVID-19 pandemic, PFA is the core of mental health-care delivery for individuals, organizations, and communities. Recognizing the importance of PFA in the present and future, we are republishing the article, “Five Essential Elements of Immediate and Mid-Term Mass Trauma Intervention: Empirical Evidence.” (Hobfoll et al., 2007) and updating it with commentaries by Stevan Hobfoll and many of the coauthors of the original article and other leaders in the field of disaster and crisis mental health care. Many of the eleven commentaries are written through the lens of the COVID-19 pandemic. The original paper outlined the five key principles that came to be known as Psychological First Aid (PFA): 1) establishing and promoting a sense of safety; 2) calming; 3) connectedness; 4) a sense of self and community efficacy (the belief and skills to enable “I/ we can do it”); and 5) hope/optimism. Today, the principles of PFA are widely implemented in post-disaster interventions. The principles of PFA can be easily taught and applied by a range of disaster workers and community members. PFA has been adopted for delivery in diverse settings for direct victims and for “first responders.” First responders in the COVID-19 pandemic include our health-care delivery teams from physicians and nurses to those who keep the hospitals’ communities running by working in the cafeteria, in housekeeping, and in communication systems; and those who keep our communities together, spanning from food delivery to schools. The principles of PFA have been applied in many settings including hospital ICUs, acute care facilities (emergency departments), nursing homes, respite centers for first responders, crisis hotlines, family reception and assistance centers, homes, businesses, schools, evacuation centers, and other community settings. What do we learn from these commentaries that adds to PFA? First, the COVID-19 pandemic highlights the changes over time and across geography – and the need to respond as new “hot spots of crisis and trauma” emerge. Similarly, the COVID-19 pandemic has brought attention to new groups to consider for care – such as long-term care facilities, ICUs, schools, and meat packing plants. The important and complex role of information and misinformation is now clearer as we see the challenges in the ability to manage
{"title":"Principles of Psychological First Aid: Core Elements of Disaster Care, COVID-19 Pandemic Care and Supportive Psychotherapy.","authors":"Robert J Ursano","doi":"10.1080/00332747.2021.2005379","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00332747.2021.2005379","url":null,"abstract":"Psychological care in times of disaster has changed substantially in the past 20 years. In acute care, Psychological First Aid (PFA), published by Hobfoll et al. in 2007 in PSYCHIATRY, now forms the core of early postdisaster response. These same principles are fundamental to nearly all supportive psychotherapy. Importantly now, during the COVID-19 pandemic, PFA is the core of mental health-care delivery for individuals, organizations, and communities. Recognizing the importance of PFA in the present and future, we are republishing the article, “Five Essential Elements of Immediate and Mid-Term Mass Trauma Intervention: Empirical Evidence.” (Hobfoll et al., 2007) and updating it with commentaries by Stevan Hobfoll and many of the coauthors of the original article and other leaders in the field of disaster and crisis mental health care. Many of the eleven commentaries are written through the lens of the COVID-19 pandemic. The original paper outlined the five key principles that came to be known as Psychological First Aid (PFA): 1) establishing and promoting a sense of safety; 2) calming; 3) connectedness; 4) a sense of self and community efficacy (the belief and skills to enable “I/ we can do it”); and 5) hope/optimism. Today, the principles of PFA are widely implemented in post-disaster interventions. The principles of PFA can be easily taught and applied by a range of disaster workers and community members. PFA has been adopted for delivery in diverse settings for direct victims and for “first responders.” First responders in the COVID-19 pandemic include our health-care delivery teams from physicians and nurses to those who keep the hospitals’ communities running by working in the cafeteria, in housekeeping, and in communication systems; and those who keep our communities together, spanning from food delivery to schools. The principles of PFA have been applied in many settings including hospital ICUs, acute care facilities (emergency departments), nursing homes, respite centers for first responders, crisis hotlines, family reception and assistance centers, homes, businesses, schools, evacuation centers, and other community settings. What do we learn from these commentaries that adds to PFA? First, the COVID-19 pandemic highlights the changes over time and across geography – and the need to respond as new “hot spots of crisis and trauma” emerge. Similarly, the COVID-19 pandemic has brought attention to new groups to consider for care – such as long-term care facilities, ICUs, schools, and meat packing plants. The important and complex role of information and misinformation is now clearer as we see the challenges in the ability to manage","PeriodicalId":49656,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatry-Interpersonal and Biological Processes","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39935941","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-01-01DOI: 10.1080/00332747.2021.1890973
Janet R Merkel
On July 18, 2020 Jon Frederickson (2020) presented a webinar on Moderate and Severe Fragility to the Intensive Shortterm Dynamic Therapy (ISTDP) community. The day preceded the up-coming publication (December 15) of his new book Co-Creating Safety: Healing the Fragile Patient. Frederickson presented a patient who was very fragile at the beginning of therapy and was on several anti-psychotic medications. The patient had years of previous therapies. During the trial therapy, the patient did not have a psychotic level of character structure but rather was very fragile. Patients with fragile character structure have trouble tolerating the anxiety that mixed feelings generate and so they rely on primitive defenses such as splitting, projection and projective identification. Because the patient was assessed as a fragile patient, Frederickson began what is known in Intensive Short-term Dynamic Therapy (ISTDP) as a graded approach. This approach uses techniques such as pressure to feeling, that is, raising the unconscious to consciousness, while regulating anxiety. The graded approach applies these techniques in a careful and gradual way so that that patient can build ego capacity while not being overwhelmed with anxiety. “Since fragile patients have such a low level of anxiety regulation and affect tolerance, we must tailor our techniques to their capacity” (Frederickson, 2013, p. 124). Patients with fragile character structure need a way of working that helps build inner self awareness and capacity so that the patient does not use splitting and prjection as means to ward off complex mixed feelings. In fragile patients the process of splitting and projection work together to ward off mixed feelings of love and rage. As mixed feelings arise, anxiety rises usually in the form of cognitive/perceptual disruption such as dissociation, confusion, visual blurring, dizziness, or ringing in the ears. Splitting works to separate the feelings of love and rage with the patient embracing the love and rejecting the feeling of rage. Then the disavowed feeling of rage is projected outward which functions to lower anxiety. In fragile patients this process of splitting and projection is unconscious but consequently very disruptive in personal and professional relationships. The aim in therapy is to help the patient be able to observe, acknowledge and bear previously avoided feelings. As the patient is able to bear these mixed feelings, splitting and projection are no longer needed to lower anxiety. The patient experiences the relief of being able to embrace and accept all feelings. The workshop participants were able to witness the slow but steady progress of the therapy during a number of sessions with the patient. The technique of bracing was demonstrated. This is the application of a consistent mild pressure to feeling while watching for and regulating anxiety. In his 2015 book, Reaching Through Resistance, Allan Abbass introduced the concept of bracing which involves
{"title":"Moderate and Severe Fragility: An ISTDP Webinar.","authors":"Janet R Merkel","doi":"10.1080/00332747.2021.1890973","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00332747.2021.1890973","url":null,"abstract":"On July 18, 2020 Jon Frederickson (2020) presented a webinar on Moderate and Severe Fragility to the Intensive Shortterm Dynamic Therapy (ISTDP) community. The day preceded the up-coming publication (December 15) of his new book Co-Creating Safety: Healing the Fragile Patient. Frederickson presented a patient who was very fragile at the beginning of therapy and was on several anti-psychotic medications. The patient had years of previous therapies. During the trial therapy, the patient did not have a psychotic level of character structure but rather was very fragile. Patients with fragile character structure have trouble tolerating the anxiety that mixed feelings generate and so they rely on primitive defenses such as splitting, projection and projective identification. Because the patient was assessed as a fragile patient, Frederickson began what is known in Intensive Short-term Dynamic Therapy (ISTDP) as a graded approach. This approach uses techniques such as pressure to feeling, that is, raising the unconscious to consciousness, while regulating anxiety. The graded approach applies these techniques in a careful and gradual way so that that patient can build ego capacity while not being overwhelmed with anxiety. “Since fragile patients have such a low level of anxiety regulation and affect tolerance, we must tailor our techniques to their capacity” (Frederickson, 2013, p. 124). Patients with fragile character structure need a way of working that helps build inner self awareness and capacity so that the patient does not use splitting and prjection as means to ward off complex mixed feelings. In fragile patients the process of splitting and projection work together to ward off mixed feelings of love and rage. As mixed feelings arise, anxiety rises usually in the form of cognitive/perceptual disruption such as dissociation, confusion, visual blurring, dizziness, or ringing in the ears. Splitting works to separate the feelings of love and rage with the patient embracing the love and rejecting the feeling of rage. Then the disavowed feeling of rage is projected outward which functions to lower anxiety. In fragile patients this process of splitting and projection is unconscious but consequently very disruptive in personal and professional relationships. The aim in therapy is to help the patient be able to observe, acknowledge and bear previously avoided feelings. As the patient is able to bear these mixed feelings, splitting and projection are no longer needed to lower anxiety. The patient experiences the relief of being able to embrace and accept all feelings. The workshop participants were able to witness the slow but steady progress of the therapy during a number of sessions with the patient. The technique of bracing was demonstrated. This is the application of a consistent mild pressure to feeling while watching for and regulating anxiety. In his 2015 book, Reaching Through Resistance, Allan Abbass introduced the concept of bracing which involves","PeriodicalId":49656,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatry-Interpersonal and Biological Processes","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00332747.2021.1890973","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"25586796","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-01-01DOI: 10.1080/00332747.2021.1889324
Jonathan Lebolt
{"title":"The Role of Race and Racism and Its Impact on Professionals and Communities in the DMV.","authors":"Jonathan Lebolt","doi":"10.1080/00332747.2021.1889324","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00332747.2021.1889324","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":49656,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatry-Interpersonal and Biological Processes","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00332747.2021.1889324","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"25586797","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}