Journal of the American Pharmacists Association最新文献

{"title":"Evaluation of a pharmacist-led multidisciplinary approach to the treatment of latent tuberculosis in refugee patients in the primary care setting","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.japh.2024.102246","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.japh.2024.102246","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Treatment of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) is essential for refugee patients who have been relocated to the United States to prevent progression to active infection.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study aimed to determine the effectiveness of a multidisciplinary team approach, embedded within a primary care clinic, to treatment of LTBI in newly resettled refugee patients compared with a local health department.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This was a single-center, retrospective chart review of newly resettled refugee patients 18-89 years old with a diagnosis of LTBI. The primary objective was completion rate of LTBI therapy within 1 year of resettlement. Secondary objectives were incidence of adverse events, regimen switches, and adherence rate.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 58 patients were included in the study: 14 individuals through the multidisciplinary clinic and 44 individuals with the local health department. Completion of therapy within 1 year of resettlement was seen in 71.4% of patients (n = 10) in the multidisciplinary clinic compared with 72.7% (n = 32) at the health department. There were 7 patients who underwent a regimen switch, all of whom were in the health department arm. Adverse effects occurred in 14.2% of patients in the multidisciplinary clinic and 15.9% of patients in the health department arm. Treatment adherence was 98.6% in the multidisciplinary clinic and 90.5% in the local health department arm.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Use of a multidisciplinary team was successful in completion of LTBI treatment in refugee patients, helping to alleviate barriers to treatment completion by ensuring adherence and close follow-up.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50015,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Pharmacists Association","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142299727","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Evaluation of a drug deactivation system for safe disposal of opioids after ambulatory surgery","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.japh.2024.102247","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.japh.2024.102247","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Prescription opioids are commonly prescribed postoperatively and increase the risk of diversion or misuse when left unused and accessible. Despite awareness of the risks associated with unused opioids, harm reduction strategies like safe storage and drug take-back events may be limited by inconvenience and patient-specific barriers to access.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To evaluate a quality improvement project designed to facilitate at-home disposal of unused opioids after day surgery.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>An observational, prospective quality improvement project was conducted in patients undergoing elective outpatient surgery at Newton-Wellesley Hospital from December 2019 to June 2020. Upon discharge, eligible patients received a Deterra drug disposal packet which deactivates unused medication. Follow-up surveys assessed packet use and reasons for nonuse 1 to 2 weeks after surgery.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>One hundred six participants received a disposal packet and responded to the survey. Among the 67 respondents with unused medication, 30% used the packet. Women were more likely to use the packet than men (predicted probability 30.2% vs. 10.4%, <em>P</em> = 0.033), and patients aged 18–25 were more likely to use the packet than those aged 26–40 (40.0% vs. 9.5%, <em>P</em> = 0.049). The most common reasons for packet nonuse included procrastination, holding onto prescriptions in case of future pain, and waiting to dispose of multiple medications.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The majority of patients surveyed had unused opioids 1 to 2 weeks after surgery, and approximately 1 in 3 patients with unused doses utilized the disposal packet. Common reasons for nonuse included procrastination and concerns about needing future medication for pain. Going forward, safe drug disposal efforts may emphasize improved patient education, partial prescription fill options, or alert systems to remind patients to safely dispose of unused medication.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50015,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Pharmacists Association","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142299724","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Impact of health literacy-conscious medication educational videos on primary medication nonadherence rates","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.japh.2024.102219","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.japh.2024.102219","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Primary medication nonadherence (PMN) occurs when a new medication is prescribed, but the patient does not obtain the medication, or an appropriate alternative. Medication knowledge may be a factor contributing to high PMN rates. A variety of approaches and technologies have been developed to enhance patient medication knowledge, though the impact of these interventions on PMN rates has not been studied.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>The objectives of this study were to: 1) compare community pharmacy PMN rates between pharmacies that offer patient medication educational video services and those that do not, and 2) assess the relationships between video service delivery and PMN status.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This cohort study utilized data from 6 pharmacies (3 case and 3 control). Adult individuals with a new electronic prescription for medications were assessed for PMN using the Pharmacy Quality Alliance measure specifications. A 6-month measurement period was used to assess if medications or an appropriate alternative were dispensed within 30 days. Descriptive statistics were used to evaluate differences in PMN rates between case and control pharmacies. The relationships between medication education video service use and PMN status were assessed using multivariable logistic regression models.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 4038 patients were included in the analyses, contributing 6311 prescriptions for PMN assessment. Case pharmacies had significantly lower (25.9% vs. 29.1%) PMN rates than control pharmacies (<em>P</em> = 0.0090). Prescriptions filled at pharmacies that utilized medication educational videos had lower odds of PMN status [odds ratio (OR) = 0.58 (0.43, 0.78)] than controls. Video use was associated with lower odds of PMN status [OR = 0.83 (0.70, 0.98)] when compared to prescriptions where patients did not receive the service.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The use of health literacy-conscious, patient educational videos were associated with improved (lower) PMN rates. Medication education technologies represent a scalable solution to improve PMN and medication access.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50015,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Pharmacists Association","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142057031","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Exploration of network facilitator experiences implementing payer-partner programs within a nationwide clinically integrated network","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.japh.2024.102240","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.japh.2024.102240","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The Community Pharmacy Enhanced Services Network (CPESN) is a clinically integrated network (CIN) of approximately 3500 community-based pharmacies in 48 local networks across the United States. CPESN USA promotes expansion of innovative programs within community-based pharmacies including value-based contracting for patient care services. As opportunities grow, it is important to define strategies and tools needed to implement payer-partner programs.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study aimed to explore strategies and resources used when implementing payer-partner programs within a CIN.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This cross-sectional electronic survey was e-mailed to 48 managing network facilitators (MNFs) representing 48 local CPESN networks across the United States. An electronic survey was e-mailed to the MNF of each local CPESN network. Fourteen questions collected the MNFs experience with (1) opportunities at the local network, (2) resources found helpful for implementing payer-partner programs, (3) barriers to implementing payer-partner programs, (4) confidence with tasks related to payer-partner program implementation, and (5) reporting what types of teammates they work with or manage when implementing a payer-partner program. The survey was open for data collection for 65 days. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 42 completed surveys were returned (response rate, 87.5%). MNFs ranked the barriers most frequently experienced as buy-in effect (n = 16, 41.0%) and management of pharmacy/network follow-through (n = 11, 28.2%). MNFs reported helpful resources for program implementation as peer-to-peer guidance (n = 31, 79.5%) and program handouts/guides (n = 30, 76.9%). MNFs reported additional resources needed as subject matter experts (n = 23, 59.0%) and templated communications (n = 22, 56.4%). MNFs expressed their highest levels of confidence in tasks related to leadership management (n = 30, 76.9%) and implementing programs (n = 28, 71.8%).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Barriers to payer-partner program implementation within the CIN were buy-in effect, management of pharmacy/network follow-through, management of peers, and management of pharmacy/network implementation. Leaders within the CIN reported desires for a toolkit that iterates successful strategies and education on building community and accountability within local networks. Development of tailored support and resources can enhance the capacity of network leaders to scale payer-partner programs within community-based pharmacies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50015,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Pharmacists Association","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142146710","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Student pharmacists lead the charge at 2024 APhA–ASP HoD","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.japh.2024.102206","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.japh.2024.102206","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":50015,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Pharmacists Association","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142418535","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"The age of the machine is here … are you ready?","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.japh.2024.102209","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.japh.2024.102209","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":50015,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Pharmacists Association","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142418533","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Cover","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/S1544-3191(24)00260-7","DOIUrl":"10.1016/S1544-3191(24)00260-7","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":50015,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Pharmacists Association","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142418530","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Tackling current events from the researchers’ perspective","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.japh.2024.102205","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.japh.2024.102205","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":50015,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Pharmacists Association","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142418534","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Association of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Employment Status Change for Practicing Pharmacists","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.japh.2024.102187","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.japh.2024.102187","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in health care workers experiencing temporary or permanent changes in employment due to layoffs, quits, and postpandemic increased job demand. Analyzing the association of the COVID-19 pandemic with employment changes and results of changes for practicing pharmacists and understanding the associations with demographic and work-related factors could inform practice, policy, and educational programs. This study aimed to explore the frequency, characteristics, and results of employment status changes (ESCs) experienced by pharmacists practicing pharmacy in March 2020 (ie, the start of the COVID-19 pandemic).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A descriptive, cross-sectional survey research design was used to collect data from a random sample of 93,990 licensed pharmacists in the United States. The study team developed an online survey questionnaire designed to assess the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on pharmacists’ work and work-life. The survey items used for this study related to ESCs, work-life characteristics, work characteristics in March 2020 and 2022, and demographic variables. A total of 4947 usable responses were received between November 2022 and January 2023.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Overall, 36.4% of respondents reported experiencing an ESC and approximately 70% of those reporting an ESC reported experiencing just 1 ECS. Overall, 39.5% of respondents who experienced an ESC stopped working (ie, were unemployed) pursuant to an ESC. Respondents who experienced an ESC reported significantly lower levels of work exhaustion and interprofessional disengagement and significantly higher levels of professional fulfillment in their current employment than respondents that did not experience an ESC.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The overall increase in demand for workers in the health care sector appeared to provide opportunities for pharmacists, especially pharmacists with 1 to 10 years of experience, to change their employment situation, resulting in better work-life characteristics. Given projections of a pharmacist shortage, research, policy, and educational programs could determine the best practices to improve work settings and the work-life characteristics of practicing pharmacists to improve the health of the current pharmacist workforce.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50015,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Pharmacists Association","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142114238","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"How new pharmacists handled COVID-19 misinformation: A qualitative study","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.japh.2024.102226","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.japh.2024.102226","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>New pharmacists, PharmD graduates of 2020 and 2021, faced the unique challenge of entering the workforce during the volatile and divisive COVID-19 pandemic. They had to navigate patient-driven misinformation while adapting to evolving roles, including the distribution and administration of COVID-19 vaccines. Understanding the experiences of new pharmacists during this period is crucial for professional development and patient care.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The study aimed to describe new pharmacists’ experiences of handling COVID-19 vaccine misinformation presented by patients.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Semi-structured Zoom interviews were conducted with PharmD 2020 and 2021 graduates recruited from St. John’s University College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences and the University of Mississippi School of Pharmacy until saturation was achieved. Interview questions were based on constructs of the Hearing, Understanding, Interpreting, Evaluating, Remembering, and Responding model and World Health Organization (WHO) algorithm on how to respond to vocal vaccine deniers. Data analysis was performed through deductive thematic content analysis, and findings were reported using the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 13 interviews were conducted, with 61.5% of participants from St. John’s University and 38.5% from UM. They worked in various pharmacy settings, including independent (30.8%), chain (23.0%), long-term care (15.4%), and ambulatory care/hospital pharmacies (30.8%). The types of COVID-19 misinformation new pharmacists heard during the pandemic align with the techniques and topics of anti-vaccine arguments outlined by the WHO’s algorithm. New pharmacists utilized evaluation skills to identify credible sources and information, interpreted patients' language and sources, and assessed patients' willingness to be corrected. All new pharmacists responded to misinformation regardless of the technique or topic; however, the mechanism of response may have differed depending on whether a technique or topic was presented.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This baseline understanding of new pharmacists’ practices in managing health misinformation can inform the development of recommendations for health misinformation management and assist pharmacy schools in identifying areas for further training for student pharmacists.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50015,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Pharmacists Association","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142120997","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}