Background: To achieve balance, persons with blindness (PWB) use proprioceptive and vestibular cues rather than the visual system; however, PWB are equally susceptible to acquire vestibular disorders. Reliable assessments of the vestibular system in PWB are essential to determine the presence or absence of vestibular disorders.
Purpose: The saccular and the utricular functioning can be assessed using cervical vestibular-evoked myogenic potential and ocular vestibular-evoked myogenic potential, respectively. Evaluation of the functional integrity of the semicircular canals requires an assessment of the vestibular ocular reflex; however, this can be challenging in PWB. Video head impulse test (vHIT) assesses the vestibular ocular reflex (VOR) elicited against the natural high-frequency head movement in the planes of all six semicircular canals. This study aimed to explore the feasibility and outcomes of administering vHIT in PWB.
Research design: Standard (static) groups comparison.
Study sample: Nineteen young PWB and 23 age-matched adults with "normal" vision (control group) were included in the study.
Data collection and analyses: PWB underwent vHIT once, while the control group was tested in three conditions; condition 1 was used to simulate blindness for the control group, where vHIT was done in a pitch-dark room without prior instructions; condition 2 included vHIT testing in daylight, without a fixed visual target and any instructions; and condition 3 involved vHIT in daylight in the presence of a set visual target and with standard instructions to maintain visual focus on the visual target.
Results: The VOR gain was abnormal in the PWB group for all the canals. Among the PWB, the lateral canals (mean = 0.63) had the best VOR gain, followed by the anterior canals (mean = 0.53) and the posterior canals (mean = 0.31). In the control group, the VOR gain was significantly reduced in condition 1. There was no significant difference between the VOR gain in the PWB group and the control group in condition 1 for the lateral and the anterior canals. A higher proportion of participants in the PWB group had the presence of refixation saccades.
Conclusion: VOR is significantly reduced in PWB but not completely absent. There may be a need to develop normative data for blind individuals to decide whether or not a person with blindness has a vestibular dysfunction, specifically a VOR deficit.
Background: Ecological momentary assessment (EMA) often places high physical and mental burden on research participants compared with retrospective self-reports. The high burden could result in noncompliance with the EMA sampling scheme protocol. It has been a concern that certain types of participants could be more likely to have low compliance, such as those who have severe hearing loss and poor speech recognition performance, are employed, are not familiar with technologies used to implement EMA (e.g., smartphones), and have poorer cognitive abilities. Noncompliance dependent on personal characteristics could negatively impact the generalizability of EMA research.
Purpose: This article aims to determine personal characteristics associated with EMA compliance in a group of adult cochlear implant (CI) candidates and users.
Research design: An observational study.
Study sample: Fifty-eight adults who were either scheduled to received CIs or were experienced CI users completed the study.
Data collection and analysis: Participants conducted smartphone-based EMA designed to assess an individual's daily auditory ecology for 1 week. EMA compliance was quantified using two metrics: the number of completed surveys and the response rate to the notification delivered by the EMA app. Personal characteristics (i.e., predictors) included age, gender, CI status (candidate or user), employment status (employed or not employed), smartphone ownership, speech recognition performance, social network size, level of depressive symptoms, and neurocognitive abilities. A word recognition test, questionnaires, and a test battery of neurocognitive assessments were used to measure the predictors. We used negative binomial regression and logistic mixed models to determine the factors associated with the number of completed surveys and the response rate, respectively. We hypothesized that, for example, employed participants with poorer speech recognition performance would have lower compliance.
Results: Contrary to the hypothesis, word recognition score was negatively associated with the number of completed surveys (p = 0.022). Holding all other variables constant, a 10-point (i.e., 10%) word recognition score decrease was associated with an 11% increase in the number of completed surveys. For the response rate, employment status was the only significant predictor (p < 0.0001). Consistent with our hypothesis, the odds of responding to EMA notifications for those who are not employed are 82% higher than the odds for those who are employed. No other studied personal characteristic was associated with compliance.
Conclusion: For CI candidates and users, EMA compliance could be affected by personal characteristics such as speech recognition performance and employment status. Because (1) participants with poor
Background: Adults and children with sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) have trouble understanding speech in rooms with reverberation when using hearing aid amplification. While the use of amplitude compression signal processing in hearing aids may contribute to this difficulty, there is conflicting evidence on the effects of amplitude compression settings on speech recognition. Less clear is the effect of a fast release time for adults and children with SNHL when using compression ratios derived from a prescriptive procedure.
Purpose: The aim of the study is to determine whether release time impacts speech recognition in reverberation for children and adults with SNHL and to determine if these effects of release time and reverberation can be predicted using indices of audibility or temporal and spectral distortion.
Research design: This is a quasi-experimental cohort study. Participants used a hearing aid simulator set to the Desired Sensation Level algorithm m[i/o] for three different amplitude compression release times. Reverberation was simulated using three different reverberation times.
Participants: Participants were 20 children and 16 adults with SNHL.
Data collection and analyses: Participants were seated in a sound-attenuating booth and then nonsense syllable recognition was measured. Predictions of speech recognition were made using indices of audibility, temporal distortion, and spectral distortion and the effects of release time and reverberation were analyzed using linear mixed models.
Results: While nonsense syllable recognition decreased in reverberation release time did not significantly affect nonsense syllable recognition. Participants with lower audibility were more susceptible to the negative effect of reverberation on nonsense syllable recognition.
Conclusion: We have extended previous work on the effects of reverberation on aided speech recognition to children with SNHL. Variations in release time did not impact the understanding of speech. An index of audibility best predicted nonsense syllable recognition in reverberation and, clinically, these results suggest that patients with less audibility are more susceptible to nonsense syllable recognition in reverberation.
Background: The Audiology Department at the Royal Surrey NHS Foundation Trust (RSFT), United Kingdom, developed a patient experience questionnaire (PEQ) to assess and compare patients' experiences of attending a wide range of appointments (e.g., hearing assessment, hearing aid fitting, hearing aid review, tinnitus therapy, balance assessment, and balance rehabilitation).
Purpose: The aim of this study was to assess the psychometric properties of the PEQ. The PEQ is a unidimensional instrument with four items that assess a patient's experience of an outpatient appointment.
Research design: Retrospective cross-sectional study.
Study sample: Patients attending appointments for audiology services at RSFT between January and March 2020.
Data collection and analysis: All patients (n = 656) attending appointments for audiology services at RSFT during randomly selected days between January and March 2020 were given the questionnaire to complete themselves (PEQ-self) or to complete on their child's behalf (PEQ-parent). The factor structures for the PEQ-self and PEQ-parent were assessed separately, using confirmatory factor analysis. A multiple-causes, multiple-indicators (MIMIC) model was fitted to explore potential bias due to gender and age. Internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach's α. The bivariate correlations between PEQ scores and other variables were evaluated using the nonparametric Spearman correlation coefficient. Floor and ceiling effects were assessed using the distribution of total scores.
Results: Confirmatory factor analysis revealed that a one-factor model gave a close fit to the data for both the self and parent versions. Cronbach's α for the total score was 0.77 for the PEQ-self and 0.86 for the PEQ-parent. The MIMIC model showed no significant direct effects of age or gender for either version.
Conclusions: Both the PEQ-self and PEQ-parent questionnaire can be reliably used to measure patients' experiences of outpatient audiology appointments. Future studies should aim to assess the psychometric properties of the PEQ-self and PEQ-parent for a range of outpatient appointments other than audiology.
Background: The United States Preventative Service Taskforce recently determined that there was insufficient evidence to recommend hearing screening in adults.
Purpose: To determine the age to screen adults in the U.S. for hearing loss and identify factors related to increased odds of hearing loss.
Research design: Epidemiological Cross-Sectional Study.
Study sample: Data from 3,409 individuals aged 20-69 years(y) were analyzed from the 1999-2000 and 2000-2002 cycles of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES).
Data collection and analysis: Hearing sensitivity from 0.5-8 kHz was assessed and hearing loss was defined as pure tone average 0.5, 1, 2, 4 kHz (PTA4) > 15 dBHL for the worse ear. Thresholds were examined separately for men and women in 2-year intervals. A multivariate ordinal regression model adjusting for age, sex, race/ethnicity, and education was used to examine relationship to determinants.
Results: Slight (>15 dBHL) hearing loss based on threshold at a single audiometric frequency was first evident in males aged 28-29y. For females, this occurred at age 34-35y. The age at which average PTA4 increased above 15 dBHL (slight hearing loss) was 46-47y for males and 56-57y for females. Multivariate ordinal regression revealed the following "high risk" factors: increased age, male sex, tinnitus, perceived hearing loss, and diabetes.
Conclusions: For the function of primary prevention, these data suggest screening should initiate at ∼30y for males and 35y for females, the ages when average hearing thresholds at a single frequency can be classified as slight hearing loss. For secondary prevention, the recommended screening ages are higher - 45y for males and 55y for females. Hearing screening is recommended for asymptomatic adults, especially those with high risk factors. Our results also highlight the limitations of PTA4 in identifying early indices of hearing loss.
Background: Patients with tinnitus may have different severity levels of tinnitus distress. Visual analog scale (VAS) is a simple method to measure the extent of subjective distress caused by tinnitus. It includes ratings of tinnitus loudness, awareness, annoyance, and impact of tinnitus on life.
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate what led to different distress levels in patients with bilateral tinnitus by analyzing the relationships among all subscales of VAS scores for tinnitus distress and the documented variables.
Research design: This study was a retrospective cohort study.
Study sample: The medical records of 268 patients who visited a tinnitus clinic between March and December 2020 were reviewed.
Data collection and analysis: Epidemiologic characteristics, subjective tinnitus distress factors including tinnitus loudness, awareness, annoyance, and impact of tinnitus on life, questionnaire results including those from the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI) and Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), and audiometric profiles were documented. Based on a bivariate analysis between variables and subtypes of subjective tinnitus distress, stepwise logistic regression was performed to identify potential influencing factors for aggravating each subtype.
Results: Data from a total of 122 patients with bilateral tinnitus were collected. The cohort included 77 males and 45 females with a mean age of 51.16 ± 13.50 years. Tinnitus loudness was associated with an accompanying headache (p < 0.001), the BDI score (p = 0.001), and the duration of tinnitus (p = 0.006). A high THI (p < 0.001) and an accompanying headache (p = 0.016) were both associated with tinnitus annoyance. Hearing thresholds at 250 Hz (p = 0.011) and 500 Hz (p = 0.002) on the left side were associated with an impact of tinnitus on life. The hearing threshold at 4 kHz on the left side alone was associated with tinnitus awareness (p = 0.013).
Conclusion: Psychologic complaints are mainly associated with tinnitus loudness and annoyance. On the other hand, hearing loss is linked with tinnitus awareness and its impact on life. Thus, an individualized, sequential approach that considers different subtypes of tinnitus severity to assess subjective tinnitus distress is needed.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：