首页 > 最新文献

Surgical Endoscopy最新文献

英文 中文
Surgeon stress, anxiety, and workload: a descriptive study of participant reported responses to fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery exercises 外科医生的压力、焦虑和工作量:对参与者报告的腹腔镜手术基础练习反应的描述性研究
Pub Date : 2024-09-13 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-024-11238-3
Aaron K. Budden, Amanda Henry, Claire E. Wakefield, Jason A. Abbott

Background

Stress while operating is an important contributor to surgeon health and burnout. Measuring stress is key to improving surgeon and patient outcomes, however biological responses to stress during surgery are variable and difficult to interpret. Participant reported measures of stress have been suggested as an alternative, but the most appropriate measure has not been defined. This study’s primary aim was to assess measures of anxiety, stress, and workload before and after surgical simulation and characterize the relationship between these measures.

Methods

Surgeons completed three laparoscopic exercises from the fundamentals of laparoscopy program (peg transfer, pattern cutting, intracorporeal suturing) in a neutral environment and “stressed” environment (ergonomic, noise, or time pressure). State trait anxiety and self-reported stress on a visual analogue scale were collected prior to simulation and again immediately afterwards. The NASA task load index (TLX) was also administered post-simulation.

Results

Of the 26 participants from gynecological and general surgery specialties, state anxiety increased in 98/148 simulations (62%) with a significant mean increase during simulation (32.9 ± 7.9 vs 39.4 ± 10.2, p < .001). Self-reported stress increased in 107/148 simulations (72%), with a significant increase in mean scores during simulation (38.7 ± 22.5 vs 48.9 ± 23.7, p < .001). NASA-TLX scores immediately after simulation ranged from 40 to 118 (mean 60.5 ± 28.7). Greater anxiety and stress scores were reported in “stressed” simulations (43.6 ± 23.1 vs 54.2 ± 23.3; 68.7 ± 27.0 vs 52.4 ± 28.2 respectively) with a significant interaction effect of the “stressed” environment and type of exercise. Anxiety and stress were moderately positively correlated prior to simulation (r = .40) and strongly positively correlated post-simulation (r = .70), however only stress was strongly correlated to workload (r = .79).

Conclusion

Stress and anxiety varied by type of laparoscopic exercise and simulation environment. Correlations between anxiety and stress are stronger post-simulation than prior to simulation. Stress, but not anxiety, is highly correlated with workload.

Graphical Abstract

背景手术中的压力是导致外科医生健康和职业倦怠的重要因素。测量压力是改善外科医生和患者预后的关键,但是手术过程中对压力的生物反应是多变和难以解释的。有人建议用参与者报告的压力测量方法来替代,但最合适的测量方法尚未确定。这项研究的主要目的是评估手术模拟前后的焦虑、压力和工作量,并描述这些指标之间的关系。方法外科医生在中性环境和 "压力 "环境(人体工程学、噪音或时间压力)中完成腹腔镜基础课程中的三种腹腔镜练习(桩转移、图案切割、体外缝合)。在模拟前和模拟后立即收集状态特质焦虑和自我报告压力的视觉模拟量表。结果 在来自妇科和普通外科的 26 名参与者中,98/148 例模拟(62%)的状态焦虑增加,模拟期间的平均焦虑显著增加(32.9 ± 7.9 vs 39.4 ± 10.2,p < .001)。在 107/148 次模拟中,自我报告的压力有所增加(72%),模拟过程中的平均得分显著增加(38.7 ± 22.5 vs 48.9 ± 23.7,p < .001)。模拟后立即进行的 NASA-TLX 评分从 40 分到 118 分不等(平均 60.5 ± 28.7)。在 "压力大 "的模拟环境中,焦虑和压力得分更高(分别为 43.6 ± 23.1 vs 54.2 ± 23.3;68.7 ± 27.0 vs 52.4 ± 28.2),"压力大 "环境与运动类型之间存在显著的交互影响。焦虑和压力在模拟前呈中度正相关(r = .40),在模拟后呈高度正相关(r = .70),但只有压力与工作量呈高度正相关(r = .79)。焦虑和压力之间的相关性在模拟后比模拟前更强。压力而非焦虑与工作量高度相关。
{"title":"Surgeon stress, anxiety, and workload: a descriptive study of participant reported responses to fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery exercises","authors":"Aaron K. Budden, Amanda Henry, Claire E. Wakefield, Jason A. Abbott","doi":"10.1007/s00464-024-11238-3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-024-11238-3","url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Background</h3><p>Stress while operating is an important contributor to surgeon health and burnout. Measuring stress is key to improving surgeon and patient outcomes, however biological responses to stress during surgery are variable and difficult to interpret. Participant reported measures of stress have been suggested as an alternative, but the most appropriate measure has not been defined. This study’s primary aim was to assess measures of anxiety, stress, and workload before and after surgical simulation and characterize the relationship between these measures.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>Surgeons completed three laparoscopic exercises from the fundamentals of laparoscopy program (peg transfer, pattern cutting, intracorporeal suturing) in a neutral environment and “stressed” environment (ergonomic, noise, or time pressure). State trait anxiety and self-reported stress on a visual analogue scale were collected prior to simulation and again immediately afterwards. The NASA task load index (TLX) was also administered post-simulation.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>Of the 26 participants from gynecological and general surgery specialties, state anxiety increased in 98/148 simulations (62%) with a significant mean increase during simulation (32.9 ± 7.9 vs 39.4 ± 10.2, <i>p</i> &lt; .001). Self-reported stress increased in 107/148 simulations (72%), with a significant increase in mean scores during simulation (38.7 ± 22.5 vs 48.9 ± 23.7, <i>p</i> &lt; .001). NASA-TLX scores immediately after simulation ranged from 40 to 118 (mean 60.5 ± 28.7). Greater anxiety and stress scores were reported in “stressed” simulations (43.6 ± 23.1 vs 54.2 ± 23.3; 68.7 ± 27.0 vs 52.4 ± 28.2 respectively) with a significant interaction effect of the “stressed” environment and type of exercise. Anxiety and stress were moderately positively correlated prior to simulation (<i>r</i> = .40) and strongly positively correlated post-simulation (<i>r</i> = .70), however only stress was strongly correlated to workload (<i>r</i> = .79).</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>Stress and anxiety varied by type of laparoscopic exercise and simulation environment. Correlations between anxiety and stress are stronger post-simulation than prior to simulation. Stress, but not anxiety, is highly correlated with workload.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Graphical Abstract</h3>\u0000","PeriodicalId":501625,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Endoscopy","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142257878","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comparison of distance versus in-person laparoscopy training using a low-cost laparoscopy simulator—a randomized controlled multi-center trial 使用低成本腹腔镜模拟器进行远程与现场腹腔镜培训的比较--随机对照多中心试验
Pub Date : 2024-09-13 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-024-11069-2
Mark Enrik Geißler, Jean-Paul Bereuter, Rona Berit Geissler, Guus Mattheus Johannes Bökkerink, Luisa Egen, Karl-Friedrich Kowalewski, Caelan Haney

Introduction

Simulation training programs are essential for novice surgeons to acquire basic experience to master laparoscopic skills. However, current state-of-the-art laparoscopy simulators are still expensive, limiting the accessibility to practical training lessons. Furthermore, training is time intensive and requires extensive spatial capacity, limiting its availability to surgeons. New laparoscopic simulators offer a cost-effective alternative, which can be used to train in a digital environment, allowing flexible, digital and personalized laparoscopic training. This study investigates if training on low-cost simulators in a digital environment is comparable to in-person training formats.

Materials and methods

From June 2023 to December 2023, 40 laparoscopic novices participated in this multi-center, prospective randomized controlled trial. All participants were randomized to either the ‟distance” (intervention) or the “in-person” (control) group. They were trained in a standardized laparoscopic training curriculum to reach a predefined level of proficiency. After completing the curriculum, participants performed four different laparoscopic tasks on the ForceSense system. Primary endpoints were overall task errors, the overall time for completion of the tasks, and force parameters.

Results

In total, 40 laparoscopic novices completed digital or in-person training. Digital training showed no significant differences in developing basic laparoscopic skills compared to in-person training. There were no significant differences in median overall errors between both training groups for all exercises combined (intervention 3 vs. control 4; p value = 0.74). In contrast, the overall task completion time was significantly lower for the group trained digitally (intervention 827.92 s vs. control 993.42; p value = 0.015). The applied forces during the final assessment showed no significant differences between both groups for all exercises. Overall, over 90% of the participants rated the training as good or very good.

Conclusion

Our study shows that students that underwent digital laparoscopic training completed tasks with a similar number of errors but in a shorter time than students that underwent in-person training. Nevertheless, the best strategies to implement such digital training options need to be evaluated further to support surgeons’ personal preferences and expectations.

导言模拟培训项目对于新手外科医生获得掌握腹腔镜技能的基本经验至关重要。然而,目前最先进的腹腔镜模拟器仍然价格昂贵,限制了实际培训课程的可及性。此外,培训需要大量时间和空间,限制了外科医生的使用。新型腹腔镜模拟器提供了一种具有成本效益的替代方案,可用于在数字化环境中进行培训,从而实现灵活、数字化和个性化的腹腔镜培训。本研究调查了在数字环境中使用低成本模拟器进行培训是否与现场培训形式具有可比性。材料和方法从2023年6月到2023年12月,40名腹腔镜新手参加了这项多中心、前瞻性随机对照试验。所有参与者被随机分配到 "远程 "组(干预组)或 "面对面 "组(对照组)。他们接受了标准化腹腔镜培训课程,以达到预定的熟练程度。完成课程后,参与者在 ForceSense 系统上执行四项不同的腹腔镜任务。结果共有 40 名腹腔镜新手完成了数字培训或现场培训。与面对面培训相比,数字化培训在发展腹腔镜基本技能方面没有明显差异。两组学员在所有练习中的总失误中位数没有明显差异(干预组 3 vs. 对照组 4;P 值 = 0.74)。相比之下,数字培训组的总体任务完成时间明显更短(干预组 827.92 秒,对照组 993.42 秒;P 值 = 0.015)。在最终评估中,两组在所有练习中的施力均无明显差异。我们的研究表明,与接受现场培训的学生相比,接受数字腹腔镜培训的学生完成任务的错误次数相似,但时间更短。尽管如此,实施此类数字培训方案的最佳策略仍需进一步评估,以支持外科医生的个人偏好和期望。
{"title":"Comparison of distance versus in-person laparoscopy training using a low-cost laparoscopy simulator—a randomized controlled multi-center trial","authors":"Mark Enrik Geißler, Jean-Paul Bereuter, Rona Berit Geissler, Guus Mattheus Johannes Bökkerink, Luisa Egen, Karl-Friedrich Kowalewski, Caelan Haney","doi":"10.1007/s00464-024-11069-2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-024-11069-2","url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Introduction</h3><p>Simulation training programs are essential for novice surgeons to acquire basic experience to master laparoscopic skills. However, current state-of-the-art laparoscopy simulators are still expensive, limiting the accessibility to practical training lessons. Furthermore, training is time intensive and requires extensive spatial capacity, limiting its availability to surgeons. New laparoscopic simulators offer a cost-effective alternative, which can be used to train in a digital environment, allowing flexible, digital and personalized laparoscopic training. This study investigates if training on low-cost simulators in a digital environment is comparable to in-person training formats.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Materials and methods</h3><p>From June 2023 to December 2023, 40 laparoscopic novices participated in this multi-center, prospective randomized controlled trial. All participants were randomized to either the ‟distance” (intervention) or the “in-person” (control) group. They were trained in a standardized laparoscopic training curriculum to reach a predefined level of proficiency. After completing the curriculum, participants performed four different laparoscopic tasks on the ForceSense system. Primary endpoints were overall task errors, the overall time for completion of the tasks, and force parameters.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>In total, 40 laparoscopic novices completed digital or in-person training. Digital training showed no significant differences in developing basic laparoscopic skills compared to in-person training. There were no significant differences in median overall errors between both training groups for all exercises combined (intervention 3 vs. control 4; <i>p</i> value = 0.74). In contrast, the overall task completion time was significantly lower for the group trained digitally (intervention 827.92 s vs. control 993.42; <i>p</i> value = 0.015). The applied forces during the final assessment showed no significant differences between both groups for all exercises. Overall, over 90% of the participants rated the training as good or very good.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>Our study shows that students that underwent digital laparoscopic training completed tasks with a similar number of errors but in a shorter time than students that underwent in-person training. Nevertheless, the best strategies to implement such digital training options need to be evaluated further to support surgeons’ personal preferences and expectations.</p>","PeriodicalId":501625,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Endoscopy","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142207260","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Concomitant hiatal hernia repair with transoral incisionless fundoplication for the treatment of refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review 治疗难治性胃食管反流病的经口无切口胃底折叠术与食管裂孔疝修补术:系统性综述
Pub Date : 2024-09-13 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-024-11201-2
Fouad Jaber, Mohammed Ayyad, Fares Ayoub, Kalpesh K. Patel, Konstantinos I. Makris, Ruben Hernaez, Wasseem Skef

Background

Transoral incisionless fundoplication (TIF) is safe and effective in select patients with hiatal hernias ≤ 2 cm with refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). For patients with hiatal hernias > 2 cm, concomitant hiatal hernia (HH) repair with TIF (cTIF) is offered as an alternative to conventional anti-reflux surgery (ARS). Yet, data on this approach is limited. Through a comprehensive systematic review, we aim to evaluate the efficacy and safety of cTIF for managing refractory GERD in patients with hernias > 2 cm.

Study design

We conducted a systematic review of studies evaluating cTIF outcomes from PubMed, EMBASE, SCOPUS, and Cochrane databases up to February 14, 2024. Primary outcomes included complete cessation of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). Secondary outcomes included objective GERD assessment, adverse events, and treatment-related side effects. Pooled analysis was employed wherever feasible.

Results

Seven observational studies (306 patients) met the inclusion criteria. Five were retrospective cohort studies and two were prospective observational studies. The median rate of discontinuation of PPIs was 73.8% (range 56.4–94.4%). Significant improvements were observed in disease-specific, validated GERD questionnaires. The median rate for complications was 4.4% (range 0–7.9%), and the 30-day readmission rate had a median of 3.3% (range 0–5.3%). The incidence of dysphagia was 11 out of 164 patients, with a median of 5.3% (range 0–8.3%), while the incidence of gas bloating was 15 out of 127 patients, with a median of 6.9% (range 0–13.8%).

Conclusion

Current data on cTIF suggests a promising alternative to ARS with comparable short-term efficacy and safety profile for managing refractory GERD with a low side effect profile. However, longer-term data and comparative efficacy studies are needed.

Graphical abstract

背景经口无切口胃底折叠术(TIF)对部分食管裂孔疝≤2 厘米且伴有难治性胃食管反流病(GERD)的患者安全有效。对于食管裂孔疝> 2厘米的患者,TIF(cTIF)同时修复食管裂孔疝(HH)可作为传统抗反流手术(ARS)的替代方法。然而,有关这种方法的数据却很有限。研究设计我们对截至 2024 年 2 月 14 日的 PubMed、EMBASE、SCOPUS 和 Cochrane 数据库中评估 cTIF 结果的研究进行了系统性回顾。主要结果包括完全停用质子泵抑制剂(PPI)。次要结果包括客观胃食管反流评估、不良事件和治疗相关副作用。结果七项观察性研究(306 名患者)符合纳入标准。其中五项为回顾性队列研究,两项为前瞻性观察研究。停用 PPIs 的中位比例为 73.8%(范围为 56.4-94.4%)。在疾病特异性胃食管反流病有效问卷调查中观察到显著改善。并发症发生率的中位数为 4.4%(范围为 0-7.9%),30 天再入院率的中位数为 3.3%(范围为 0-5.3%)。164 名患者中,吞咽困难发生率为 11 例,中位数为 5.3%(范围为 0-8.3%);127 名患者中,胃胀发生率为 15 例,中位数为 6.9%(范围为 0-13.8%)。然而,还需要更长期的数据和疗效比较研究。
{"title":"Concomitant hiatal hernia repair with transoral incisionless fundoplication for the treatment of refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review","authors":"Fouad Jaber, Mohammed Ayyad, Fares Ayoub, Kalpesh K. Patel, Konstantinos I. Makris, Ruben Hernaez, Wasseem Skef","doi":"10.1007/s00464-024-11201-2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-024-11201-2","url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Background</h3><p>Transoral incisionless fundoplication (TIF) is safe and effective in select patients with hiatal hernias ≤ 2 cm with refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). For patients with hiatal hernias &gt; 2 cm, concomitant hiatal hernia (HH) repair with TIF (cTIF) is offered as an alternative to conventional anti-reflux surgery (ARS). Yet, data on this approach is limited. Through a comprehensive systematic review, we aim to evaluate the efficacy and safety of cTIF for managing refractory GERD in patients with hernias &gt; 2 cm.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Study design</h3><p>We conducted a systematic review of studies evaluating cTIF outcomes from PubMed, EMBASE, SCOPUS, and Cochrane databases up to February 14, 2024. Primary outcomes included complete cessation of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). Secondary outcomes included objective GERD assessment, adverse events, and treatment-related side effects. Pooled analysis was employed wherever feasible.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>Seven observational studies (306 patients) met the inclusion criteria. Five were retrospective cohort studies and two were prospective observational studies. The median rate of discontinuation of PPIs was 73.8% (range 56.4–94.4%). Significant improvements were observed in disease-specific, validated GERD questionnaires. The median rate for complications was 4.4% (range 0–7.9%), and the 30-day readmission rate had a median of 3.3% (range 0–5.3%). The incidence of dysphagia was 11 out of 164 patients, with a median of 5.3% (range 0–8.3%), while the incidence of gas bloating was 15 out of 127 patients, with a median of 6.9% (range 0–13.8%).</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>Current data on cTIF suggests a promising alternative to ARS with comparable short-term efficacy and safety profile for managing refractory GERD with a low side effect profile. However, longer-term data and comparative efficacy studies are needed.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Graphical abstract</h3>\u0000","PeriodicalId":501625,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Endoscopy","volume":"78 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142257873","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Elevated preoperative lower esophageal sphincter pressure predicts improved clinical outcomes after per oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) 术前食管下括约肌压力升高预示着经口腔内窥镜肌切开术(POEM)后临床效果的改善
Pub Date : 2024-09-13 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-024-11229-4
Hamza Nasir Chatha, Joshua Lyons, Christina S. Boutros, Saher-Zahra Khan, Patrick Wieland, Iris Levine, Jamie Benson, Christine Alvarado, Guy Katz, Jeffrey M. Marks

Background

Although per oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) has shown to be beneficial for the treatment of achalasia, it can be difficult to predict who will have a robust and long-lasting response. Historically, it has been shown that higher lower esophageal sphincter pressures have been associated with poorer responses to alternative endoscopic therapies such as Botox therapy and pneumatic dilation. This study was designed to evaluate if modern preoperative manometric data could similarly predict response to therapy after POEM.

Methods

This was a retrospective study of 237 patients who underwent POEM at a single institution over a period of 13 years (2011–2023) and who had a high-resolution manometry performed preoperatively and an Eckardt symptom score performed both preoperative and postoperatively. The achalasia type and integrated relaxation pressures (IRP) were tested for potential correlation with the need for any further achalasia interventions postoperatively as well as the degree of Eckardt score reduction using a linear regression model.

Results

The Achalasia type on preoperative manometry was not predictive for further interventions or degree of Eckardt score reduction (p = 0.76 and 0.43, respectively). A higher IRP was not predictive of the need for further interventions, however, it was predictive of a greater reduction in postoperative Eckardt scores (p = 0.03) as shown by the non-zero regression slope.

Conclusion

In this study, achalasia type was not a predictive factor in the need for further interventions or the degree of symptom relief. Although IRP was not predictive of the need for further interventions, a higher IRP did predict better symptomatic relief postoperatively. This result is opposite that of other endoscopic treatment modalities (Botox and pneumatic dilation). Therefore, patients with higher IRP on preoperative high-resolution manometry would likely benefit from POEM which provides significant symptomatic relief postoperatively.

背景虽然经口腔内镜下肌切开术(POEM)已被证明对治疗贲门失弛缓症有益,但很难预测哪些患者会获得稳健而持久的疗效。从历史上看,较高的食管下括约肌压力与肉毒杆菌毒素疗法和气压扩张术等替代内窥镜疗法的不良反应有关。本研究旨在评估现代术前测压数据是否同样可以预测 POEM 术后的治疗反应。方法这是一项回顾性研究,研究对象是在 13 年内(2011-2023 年)在一家医疗机构接受 POEM 手术的 237 名患者,这些患者在术前进行了高分辨率测压,并在术前和术后进行了 Eckardt 症状评分。采用线性回归模型检测了贲门失弛缓症类型和综合松弛压(IRP)与术后是否需要进一步进行贲门失弛缓症干预以及 Eckardt 评分降低程度的潜在相关性。然而,从非零回归斜率可以看出,IRP 越高,术后 Eckardt 评分的降低幅度越大(p = 0.03)。虽然 IRP 不能预测是否需要进一步干预,但 IRP 越高,术后症状缓解越好。这一结果与其他内窥镜治疗方法(肉毒杆菌毒素和气压扩张术)相反。因此,术前进行高分辨率测压时IRP较高的患者很可能会从POEM中获益,因为POEM在术后能明显缓解症状。
{"title":"Elevated preoperative lower esophageal sphincter pressure predicts improved clinical outcomes after per oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM)","authors":"Hamza Nasir Chatha, Joshua Lyons, Christina S. Boutros, Saher-Zahra Khan, Patrick Wieland, Iris Levine, Jamie Benson, Christine Alvarado, Guy Katz, Jeffrey M. Marks","doi":"10.1007/s00464-024-11229-4","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-024-11229-4","url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Background</h3><p>Although per oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) has shown to be beneficial for the treatment of achalasia, it can be difficult to predict who will have a robust and long-lasting response. Historically, it has been shown that higher lower esophageal sphincter pressures have been associated with poorer responses to alternative endoscopic therapies such as Botox therapy and pneumatic dilation. This study was designed to evaluate if modern preoperative manometric data could similarly predict response to therapy after POEM.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>This was a retrospective study of 237 patients who underwent POEM at a single institution over a period of 13 years (2011–2023) and who had a high-resolution manometry performed preoperatively and an Eckardt symptom score performed both preoperative and postoperatively. The achalasia type and integrated relaxation pressures (IRP) were tested for potential correlation with the need for any further achalasia interventions postoperatively as well as the degree of Eckardt score reduction using a linear regression model.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>The Achalasia type on preoperative manometry was not predictive for further interventions or degree of Eckardt score reduction (<i>p</i> = 0.76 and 0.43, respectively). A higher IRP was not predictive of the need for further interventions, however, it was predictive of a greater reduction in postoperative Eckardt scores (<i>p</i> = 0.03) as shown by the non-zero regression slope.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>In this study, achalasia type was not a predictive factor in the need for further interventions or the degree of symptom relief. Although IRP was not predictive of the need for further interventions, a higher IRP did predict better symptomatic relief postoperatively. This result is opposite that of other endoscopic treatment modalities (Botox and pneumatic dilation). Therefore, patients with higher IRP on preoperative high-resolution manometry would likely benefit from POEM which provides significant symptomatic relief postoperatively.</p>","PeriodicalId":501625,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Endoscopy","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142257919","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic-assisted extended mesorectal excision: a comprehensive meta-analysis and systematic review of perioperative and long-term outcomes 机器人辅助与腹腔镜辅助扩大直肠系膜切除术:围手术期和长期疗效的综合荟萃分析和系统性综述
Pub Date : 2024-09-13 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-024-11222-x
Ahmed Abdelsamad, Mohammed Khaled Mohammed, Aya Sayed Ahmed Said Serour, Ibrahim Khalil, Zeyad M. Wesh, Laila Rashidi, Mike Ralf Langenbach, Florian Gebauer, Khaled Ashraf Mohamed

Background

Concurrent neoadjuvant chemo-radiation (nCRT) with total mesorectal excision (TME) alone sometimes fails to cure lateral lymph node metastasis (LLNM). Therefore, additional lateral lymph node dissection (LLND) can help in the treatment of these patients. This is what we refer to as extended total mesorectal excision (eTME). Such operations (TME alone or eTME) can be performed using conventional laparoscopic techniques and robotic-assisted techniques as well. Our meta-analysis aims to compare the results of robot-assisted (R-eTME) versus laparoscopic-assisted extended mesorectal excision (L-eTME) in terms of short- and long-term outcomes.

Methodology

Databases searched using title and abstract included Medline (via PubMed), Web of Science, Scopus, and Embase, up to February 20, 2024. All studies that documented robotic versus laparoscopic procedures for extended total mesorectal excision (R-eTME versus L-eTME) and reported more than two relevant outcomes, were included in the study.

Results

Our meta-analysis demonstrates four significant outcomes (operative time, urinary complications, overall recurrence, and admission days) between the laparoscopic and robotic groups. The robotic approach shows advantages over the laparoscopic approach in these outcomes except for the operative time (minute), which was longer in the robotic group compared to the laparoscopic group. The laparoscopic group is associated with a higher overall recurrence than the robotic group with an Odds Ratio of 2(95% CI, 1–4, p = 0.05).

Conclusion

This meta-analysis study showed that the R-eTME group had a lower recurrence rate compared to the L-eTME group. Additionally, hospital admission days increased significantly in the laparoscopic group. Other long-term outcomes did not differ significantly between the two groups. Short-term outcomes were similar, except for more urinary complications in the laparoscopic group. In conclusion, the study suggests that robotic surgery may offer advantages over laparoscopic surgery for eTME. Further research and analysis could provide further insight into the potential benefits of robotic surgery in this procedure, particularly when surgeon experience, center volume, and learning curve are taken into consideration.

背景单纯的新辅助化疗(nCRT)和全直肠系膜切除术(TME)有时无法治愈侧淋巴结转移(LLNM)。因此,额外的侧淋巴结清扫术(LLND)有助于治疗这些患者。这就是我们所说的扩展全直肠系膜切除术(eTME)。此类手术(单纯 TME 或 eTME)可采用传统腹腔镜技术,也可采用机器人辅助技术。我们的荟萃分析旨在比较机器人辅助(R-eTME)与腹腔镜辅助扩大直肠系膜切除术(L-eTME)在短期和长期疗效方面的结果。方法截至2024年2月20日,使用标题和摘要检索的数据库包括Medline(通过PubMed)、Web of Science、Scopus和Embase。结果我们的荟萃分析表明,腹腔镜组和机器人组有四个显著的结果(手术时间、泌尿系统并发症、总复发率和入院天数)。除手术时间(分钟)机器人组比腹腔镜组更长外,其他结果均显示机器人方法比腹腔镜方法更有优势。腹腔镜组的总复发率高于机器人组,Odds Ratio 为 2(95% CI,1-4,p = 0.05)。结论这项荟萃分析研究表明,与 L-eTME 组相比,R-eTME 组的复发率较低。此外,腹腔镜组的住院天数明显增加。其他长期结果在两组之间没有明显差异。除了腹腔镜组出现更多泌尿系统并发症外,两组的短期疗效相似。总之,该研究表明,机器人手术治疗 eTME 可能比腹腔镜手术更有优势。进一步的研究和分析可以让人们进一步了解机器人手术在该手术中的潜在优势,尤其是在考虑到外科医生经验、中心数量和学习曲线的情况下。
{"title":"Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic-assisted extended mesorectal excision: a comprehensive meta-analysis and systematic review of perioperative and long-term outcomes","authors":"Ahmed Abdelsamad, Mohammed Khaled Mohammed, Aya Sayed Ahmed Said Serour, Ibrahim Khalil, Zeyad M. Wesh, Laila Rashidi, Mike Ralf Langenbach, Florian Gebauer, Khaled Ashraf Mohamed","doi":"10.1007/s00464-024-11222-x","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-024-11222-x","url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Background</h3><p>Concurrent neoadjuvant chemo-radiation (nCRT) with total mesorectal excision (TME) alone sometimes fails to cure lateral lymph node metastasis (LLNM). Therefore, additional lateral lymph node dissection (LLND) can help in the treatment of these patients. This is what we refer to as extended total mesorectal excision (eTME). Such operations (TME alone or eTME) can be performed using conventional laparoscopic techniques and robotic-assisted techniques as well. Our meta-analysis aims to compare the results of robot-assisted (R-eTME) versus laparoscopic-assisted extended mesorectal excision (L-eTME) in terms of short- and long-term outcomes.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methodology</h3><p>Databases searched using title and abstract included Medline (via PubMed), Web of Science, Scopus, and Embase, up to February 20, 2024. All studies that documented robotic versus laparoscopic procedures for extended total mesorectal excision (R-eTME versus L-eTME) and reported more than two relevant outcomes, were included in the study.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>Our meta-analysis demonstrates four significant outcomes (operative time, urinary complications, overall recurrence, and admission days) between the laparoscopic and robotic groups. The robotic approach shows advantages over the laparoscopic approach in these outcomes except for the operative time (minute), which was longer in the robotic group compared to the laparoscopic group. The laparoscopic group is associated with a higher overall recurrence than the robotic group with an Odds Ratio of 2(95% CI, 1–4, <i>p </i>= 0.05).</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>This meta-analysis study showed that the R-eTME group had a lower recurrence rate compared to the L-eTME group. Additionally, hospital admission days increased significantly in the laparoscopic group. Other long-term outcomes did not differ significantly between the two groups. Short-term outcomes were similar, except for more urinary complications in the laparoscopic group. In conclusion, the study suggests that robotic surgery may offer advantages over laparoscopic surgery for eTME. Further research and analysis could provide further insight into the potential benefits of robotic surgery in this procedure, particularly when surgeon experience, center volume, and learning curve are taken into consideration.</p>","PeriodicalId":501625,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Endoscopy","volume":"57 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142207258","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Conventional versus rubber band traction-assisted endoscopic submucosal dissection for rectal neuroendocrine tumors: a single-center retrospective study (with video) 治疗直肠神经内分泌肿瘤的传统方法与橡皮筋牵引辅助内镜黏膜下剥离术:一项单中心回顾性研究(附视频)
Pub Date : 2024-09-13 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-024-11244-5
Jinbang Peng, Jiajia Lin, Lina Fang, Jingjing Zhou, Yaqi Song, Chaoyu Yang, Yu Zhang, Binbin Gu, Ziwei Ji, Yandi Lu, Xinli Mao, Lingling Yan

Background

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a safe and effective technique for the treatment of gastrointestinal tumors, including rectal neuroendocrine tumors (r-NETs). However, the relative advantages of traction-assisted ESD for the treatment of small rectal lesions are still debated.

Aims

We conducted a study to compare the efficacy and safety of rubber band traction-assisted ESD (RBT-ESD) to conventional ESD (C-ESD).

Methods

This study retrospectively analyzed consecutive patients with r-NET treated with ESD between October 2021 and October 2023. Our study assessed differences between the groups in the complete resection rate of lesions, muscular layer injury, surgical complications, operation time, resection speed, time to liquid diet, postoperative hospital stay, hospital cost, and recurrence rate.

Results

A total of 119 patients with r-NETs participated in this study (RBT-ESD group, n = 27; C-ESD group, n = 92). The operation time in RBT-ESD group was shorter than in C-ESD group, but the difference was not statistically significant (16.0 min [9.0–22.0 min] vs. 18.0 min [13.3–27.0 min], P = 0.056). However, the resection speed was significantly faster in the RBT-ESD group (6.7 vs. 4.1 mm2/min, P = 0.005). Furthermore, the RBT-ESD group showed significantly less muscular layer injury (P = 0.047) and faster diet recovery (P = 0.035). No significant differences were observed in the complete resection rate, surgical complications, postoperative hospital stay, hospital cost, or recurrence rate between the two groups.

Conclusion

For r-NETs of < 2 cm in size, the RBT method did not significantly shorten the operation time but resulted in faster resection speed, less muscular layer injury, and earlier postoperative recovery to a liquid diet.

Graphical Abstract

背景内镜黏膜下剥离术(ESD)是治疗胃肠道肿瘤(包括直肠神经内分泌肿瘤(r-NET))的一种安全有效的技术。目的我们开展了一项研究,比较橡皮筋牵引辅助ESD(RBT-ESD)与传统ESD(C-ESD)的有效性和安全性。方法本研究回顾性分析了2021年10月至2023年10月期间接受ESD治疗的连续r-NET患者。我们的研究评估了两组患者在病灶完全切除率、肌肉层损伤、手术并发症、手术时间、切除速度、流质饮食时间、术后住院时间、住院费用和复发率等方面的差异。结果共有119例r-NET患者参与了这项研究(RBT-ESD组,n = 27;C-ESD组,n = 92)。RBT-ESD 组的手术时间短于 C-ESD 组,但差异无统计学意义(16.0 分钟 [9.0-22.0 分钟] vs. 18.0 分钟 [13.3-27.0 分钟],P = 0.056)。然而,RBT-ESD 组的切除速度明显更快(6.7 mm2/min 对 4.1 mm2/min,P = 0.005)。此外,RBT-ESD 组的肌肉层损伤明显更少(P = 0.047),饮食恢复更快(P = 0.035)。结论对于 2 厘米大小的 r-NET,RBT 方法没有明显缩短手术时间,但切除速度更快,肌肉层损伤更少,术后更早恢复流质饮食。
{"title":"Conventional versus rubber band traction-assisted endoscopic submucosal dissection for rectal neuroendocrine tumors: a single-center retrospective study (with video)","authors":"Jinbang Peng, Jiajia Lin, Lina Fang, Jingjing Zhou, Yaqi Song, Chaoyu Yang, Yu Zhang, Binbin Gu, Ziwei Ji, Yandi Lu, Xinli Mao, Lingling Yan","doi":"10.1007/s00464-024-11244-5","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-024-11244-5","url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Background</h3><p>Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a safe and effective technique for the treatment of gastrointestinal tumors, including rectal neuroendocrine tumors (r-NETs). However, the relative advantages of traction-assisted ESD for the treatment of small rectal lesions are still debated.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Aims</h3><p>We conducted a study to compare the efficacy and safety of rubber band traction-assisted ESD (RBT-ESD) to conventional ESD (C-ESD).</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>This study retrospectively analyzed consecutive patients with r-NET treated with ESD between October 2021 and October 2023. Our study assessed differences between the groups in the complete resection rate of lesions, muscular layer injury, surgical complications, operation time, resection speed, time to liquid diet, postoperative hospital stay, hospital cost, and recurrence rate.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>A total of 119 patients with r-NETs participated in this study (RBT-ESD group, <i>n</i> = 27; C-ESD group, <i>n</i> = 92). The operation time in RBT-ESD group was shorter than in C-ESD group, but the difference was not statistically significant (16.0 min [9.0–22.0 min] vs. 18.0 min [13.3–27.0 min], <i>P</i> = 0.056). However, the resection speed was significantly faster in the RBT-ESD group (6.7 vs. 4.1 mm<sup>2</sup>/min, <i>P</i> = 0.005). Furthermore, the RBT-ESD group showed significantly less muscular layer injury (<i>P</i> = 0.047) and faster diet recovery (<i>P</i> = 0.035). No significant differences were observed in the complete resection rate, surgical complications, postoperative hospital stay, hospital cost, or recurrence rate between the two groups.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>For r-NETs of &lt; 2 cm in size, the RBT method did not significantly shorten the operation time but resulted in faster resection speed, less muscular layer injury, and earlier postoperative recovery to a liquid diet.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Graphical Abstract</h3>\u0000","PeriodicalId":501625,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Endoscopy","volume":"141 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142257917","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comparable improvement and resolution of obesity-related comorbidities in endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty vs laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: single-center study 内镜袖状胃成形术与腹腔镜袖状胃切除术对肥胖相关并发症的改善和消除效果相当:单中心研究
Pub Date : 2024-09-13 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-024-11194-y
Stephanie Joseph, Vanessa N. Vandruff, Julia R. Amundson, Simon Che, Christopher Zimmermann, Shun Ishii, Kristine Kuchta, H. Mason Hedberg, Woody Denham, John Linn, Michael B. Ujiki

Background

Despite excellent surgical outcomes, a minority of qualified patients undergo weight loss surgery. Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty (ESG), an incisionless procedure, has proven to be effective in achieving weight loss and comorbidity improvement. We aim to compare outcomes of ESG to those of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy (LSG).

Method

A retrospective review of a prospective database of patients who underwent ESG and LSG at NorthShore University HealthSystem from 2016 to 2023 was completed. Demographic and outcome data were analyzed. Pre- and post-surgical data were compared using chi-square and two-sample t tests. Improvement or resolution of obesity-related comorbidities were also assessed.

Results

A total of 212 LSG and 68 ESG patients were reviewed. ESG patients were older (47 ± 10 vs. 43 ± 12, p = 0.006) and less obese (BMI 37.0 ± 5.5 vs. 45.8 ± 0.4, p < 0.001) than LSG patients. Median length of stay after ESG was 0 days and after LSG 1 day (p < 0.001). Severe adverse events were seen less frequent after ESG (1.47%, vs 3.77%). LSG achieved more significant %TBWL at 6 months (25.2 ± 8.9 vs 14.9 ± 7.4), 1 year (27.5 ± 10.8 vs 14.1 ± 9.8), and 2 years (25.7 ± 10.8 vs 10.5 ± 8.8, all p < 0.001) after surgery when compared to ESG. LSG achieved significantly greater %EWL compared to ESG at 6 months (57.0 ± 20.7 vs 50.4 ± 29.2, p = 0.137), 1 year (61.4 ± 24.6 vs 46.5 ± 34.0, p = 0.026), and 2 years postoperatively (59.7 ± 25.5 vs 32.6 ± 28.2, p = 0.001). There were no statistically significant differences in rates of improvement or resolution of diabetes, obstructive sleep apnea, hyperlipidemia, or hypertension.

Conclusion

ESG is an effective procedure for weight loss and comorbidity resolution. Obesity-related comorbidities are comparably improved and resolved following ESG vs LSG. Although the weight loss in LSG is significantly higher, patients can expect a shorter hospital length of stay and a lower rate of complications after ESG. ESG continues to show promise for long-term weight loss and improvement in health.

背景尽管手术效果极佳,但只有少数符合条件的患者接受了减肥手术。内镜袖状胃成形术(ESG)是一种无切口手术,已被证明能有效减轻体重并改善合并症。我们旨在比较 ESG 与腹腔镜袖状胃切除术(LSG)的疗效。方法对 2016 年至 2023 年期间在 NorthShore University HealthSystem 接受 ESG 和 LSG 手术的患者的前瞻性数据库进行了回顾性审查。分析了人口统计学和结果数据。使用卡方检验和双样本 t 检验比较了手术前和手术后的数据。此外,还评估了肥胖相关合并症的改善或缓解情况。与 LSG 患者相比,ESG 患者年龄更大(47 ± 10 vs. 43 ± 12,p = 0.006),肥胖程度更轻(BMI 37.0 ± 5.5 vs. 45.8 ± 0.4,p < 0.001)。ESG 术后的中位住院时间为 0 天,LSG 术后为 1 天(p < 0.001)。ESG 后发生严重不良事件的比例较低(1.47% vs 3.77%)。与 ESG 相比,LSG 在术后 6 个月(25.2±8.9 vs 14.9±7.4)、1 年(27.5±10.8 vs 14.1±9.8)和 2 年(25.7±10.8 vs 10.5±8.8,均 p <0.001)的髋关节屈曲度(TBWL)显著增加。与 ESG 相比,LSG 在术后 6 个月(57.0 ± 20.7 vs 50.4 ± 29.2,p = 0.137)、1 年(61.4 ± 24.6 vs 46.5 ± 34.0,p = 0.026)和 2 年(59.7 ± 25.5 vs 32.6 ± 28.2,p = 0.001)所获得的 EWL 百分比明显更高。在糖尿病、阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停、高脂血症或高血压的改善或缓解率方面,差异无统计学意义。ESG与LSG相比,肥胖相关合并症的改善和缓解程度相当。虽然 LSG 的减重效果明显更高,但 ESG 术后患者的住院时间更短,并发症发生率更低。ESG 继续显示出长期减轻体重和改善健康的前景。
{"title":"Comparable improvement and resolution of obesity-related comorbidities in endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty vs laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: single-center study","authors":"Stephanie Joseph, Vanessa N. Vandruff, Julia R. Amundson, Simon Che, Christopher Zimmermann, Shun Ishii, Kristine Kuchta, H. Mason Hedberg, Woody Denham, John Linn, Michael B. Ujiki","doi":"10.1007/s00464-024-11194-y","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-024-11194-y","url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Background</h3><p>Despite excellent surgical outcomes, a minority of qualified patients undergo weight loss surgery. Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty (ESG), an incisionless procedure, has proven to be effective in achieving weight loss and comorbidity improvement. We aim to compare outcomes of ESG to those of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy (LSG).</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Method</h3><p>A retrospective review of a prospective database of patients who underwent ESG and LSG at NorthShore University HealthSystem from 2016 to 2023 was completed. Demographic and outcome data were analyzed. Pre- and post-surgical data were compared using chi-square and two-sample <i>t</i> tests. Improvement or resolution of obesity-related comorbidities were also assessed.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>A total of 212 LSG and 68 ESG patients were reviewed. ESG patients were older (47 ± 10 vs. 43 ± 12, <i>p</i> = 0.006) and less obese (BMI 37.0 ± 5.5 vs. 45.8 ± 0.4, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) than LSG patients. Median length of stay after ESG was 0 days and after LSG 1 day (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Severe adverse events were seen less frequent after ESG (1.47%, vs 3.77%). LSG achieved more significant %TBWL at 6 months (25.2 ± 8.9 vs 14.9 ± 7.4), 1 year (27.5 ± 10.8 vs 14.1 ± 9.8), and 2 years (25.7 ± 10.8 vs 10.5 ± 8.8, all <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) after surgery when compared to ESG. LSG achieved significantly greater %EWL compared to ESG at 6 months (57.0 ± 20.7 vs 50.4 ± 29.2, <i>p</i> = 0.137), 1 year (61.4 ± 24.6 vs 46.5 ± 34.0, <i>p</i> = 0.026), and 2 years postoperatively (59.7 ± 25.5 vs 32.6 ± 28.2, <i>p</i> = 0.001). There were no statistically significant differences in rates of improvement or resolution of diabetes, obstructive sleep apnea, hyperlipidemia, or hypertension.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>ESG is an effective procedure for weight loss and comorbidity resolution. Obesity-related comorbidities are comparably improved and resolved following ESG vs LSG. Although the weight loss in LSG is significantly higher, patients can expect a shorter hospital length of stay and a lower rate of complications after ESG. ESG continues to show promise for long-term weight loss and improvement in health.</p>","PeriodicalId":501625,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Endoscopy","volume":"42 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142257876","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
One year follow-up of the colon cancer patient cohort treated with a novel miniaturized robotic-assisted surgery device (mRASD) 对使用新型微型机器人辅助手术装置(mRASD)治疗的结肠癌患者进行为期一年的随访
Pub Date : 2024-09-13 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-024-11179-x
John H. Marks, Michael A. Jobst, Deborah S. Keller, Jorge A. Lagares-Garcia, Henry P. Schoonyoung, Shane M. Farritor, Dmitry Oleynikov

Background

With the proven benefits of minimally invasive surgery, there is steady growth in robotic surgery use and interest in novel robotic platforms. A miniaturized Robotic-Assisted Surgery Device (mRASD) has been in clinical use under a multi-center, investigational device exemption (IDE) study for right and left colectomy. The goal of this work was to report the short-term and 12-month outcomes specifically for the cohort of colon cancer patients that underwent surgery using the mRASD.

Method

From the IDE study that included both benign and malignant diseases, long-term follow-up was only conducted for patients with colon cancer. The main outcome measures were the oncologic quality metrics (Overall Survival, OS and Disease-free Survival, DFS). Secondary outcomes included incidence of intra-operative, device-related, and procedure-related adverse events. Frequency statistics were performed to assess the measures of central tendency and variability in short (within 30 days) and long-term (1-year) outcomes.

Results

Thirty total patients underwent a colectomy with mRASD; 17 (57%) were diagnosed with a malignancy and included in this analysis. The mean patient age was 59.9 ± 13.2 years. There were no intraoperative or device-related adverse events. In 100% of cases (n = 17), the primary dissection was completed and hemostasis maintained using the mRASD, and negative margins were achieved. At 30 days postoperatively, the major complication rate was 6%, and there was one unplanned reoperation for anastomotic leak. At one-year follow-up, the OS and DFS rates were 100 and 94%, respectively. In one patient, omental implants were discovered at the time of surgery, and the patient opted to not undergo additional therapy.

Conclusions

The first experience with mRASD for colectomy in colon cancer demonstrated technical effectiveness and an acceptable surgical safety profile in line with other minimally invasive procedures. The study continues to monitor disease recurrence and survival outcomes in this cohort.

背景随着微创手术的优势得到证实,机器人手术的使用稳步增长,人们对新型机器人平台的兴趣也日益浓厚。微型机器人辅助手术设备(mRASD)已在一项多中心、研究设备豁免(IDE)研究中用于左右结肠切除术的临床应用。这项工作的目的是报告使用 mRASD 进行手术的结肠癌患者的短期和 12 个月疗效。主要结果指标为肿瘤学质量指标(总生存期(OS)和无病生存期(DFS))。次要结果包括术中、设备相关和手术相关不良事件的发生率。对短期(30 天内)和长期(1 年)结果的中心倾向性和变异性进行了频数统计。患者平均年龄为(59.9 ± 13.2)岁。术中未发生与设备相关的不良事件。在100%的病例(n = 17)中,使用mRASD完成了初步剥离并保持了止血,而且达到了阴性边缘。术后30天,主要并发症发生率为6%,有1例因吻合口漏意外再次手术。随访一年后,OS 和 DFS 率分别为 100% 和 94%。结论mRASD用于结肠癌结肠切除术的首次经验表明,其技术有效性和可接受的手术安全性与其他微创手术一致。该研究将继续监测该组患者的疾病复发和生存情况。
{"title":"One year follow-up of the colon cancer patient cohort treated with a novel miniaturized robotic-assisted surgery device (mRASD)","authors":"John H. Marks, Michael A. Jobst, Deborah S. Keller, Jorge A. Lagares-Garcia, Henry P. Schoonyoung, Shane M. Farritor, Dmitry Oleynikov","doi":"10.1007/s00464-024-11179-x","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-024-11179-x","url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Background</h3><p>With the proven benefits of minimally invasive surgery, there is steady growth in robotic surgery use and interest in novel robotic platforms. A miniaturized Robotic-Assisted Surgery Device (mRASD) has been in clinical use under a multi-center, investigational device exemption (IDE) study for right and left colectomy. The goal of this work was to report the short-term and 12-month outcomes specifically for the cohort of colon cancer patients that underwent surgery using the mRASD.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Method</h3><p>From the IDE study that included both benign and malignant diseases, long-term follow-up was only conducted for patients with colon cancer. The main outcome measures were the oncologic quality metrics (Overall Survival, OS and Disease-free Survival, DFS). Secondary outcomes included incidence of intra-operative, device-related, and procedure-related adverse events. Frequency statistics were performed to assess the measures of central tendency and variability in short (within 30 days) and long-term (1-year) outcomes.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>Thirty total patients underwent a colectomy with mRASD; 17 (57%) were diagnosed with a malignancy and included in this analysis. The mean patient age was 59.9 ± 13.2 years. There were no intraoperative or device-related adverse events. In 100% of cases (<i>n</i> = 17), the primary dissection was completed and hemostasis maintained using the mRASD, and negative margins were achieved. At 30 days postoperatively, the major complication rate was 6%, and there was one unplanned reoperation for anastomotic leak. At one-year follow-up, the OS and DFS rates were 100 and 94%, respectively. In one patient, omental implants were discovered at the time of surgery, and the patient opted to not undergo additional therapy.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusions</h3><p>The first experience with mRASD for colectomy in colon cancer demonstrated technical effectiveness and an acceptable surgical safety profile in line with other minimally invasive procedures. The study continues to monitor disease recurrence and survival outcomes in this cohort.</p>","PeriodicalId":501625,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Endoscopy","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142257920","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A novel color-aided system for diagnosis of early gastric cancer using magnifying endoscopy with narrow-band imaging 利用窄带成像放大内镜诊断早期胃癌的新型彩色辅助系统
Pub Date : 2024-09-13 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-024-11235-6
Hui Zhang, Rongwei Ruan, Jin Fang, Jiangping Yu, Shengsen Chen, Yali Tao, Shuwen Zhu, Shi Wang

Background

The Pink Zone Pattern (PP) sign is a typical color alteration of early gastric cancer (EGC) under magnifying endoscopic narrow-band imaging (ME-NBI). By integrating the color changes (PP sign) with the “vessel plus surface (VS)” classification system, we developed an innovative diagnostic system for EGC and named it “Pink Microsurface Microvascular (PSV)” system. Here, we aimed to elucidate the diagnostic performance of the PSV system for EGC.

Methods

We conducted a single-center prospective clinical study (before-after design) consisting of 2 cross-sectional studies at 2 separate periods. In the before phase, 184 suspected lesions were evaluated using the VS system under ME-NBI; in the after phase, 183 suspected lesions were evaluated using the PSV system. We compared the diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) between the VS group and the PSV group.

Results

The accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of the VS system for EGC were 84.6%, 87.0%, 83.6%, 67.8%, and 94.2%, respectively, and those for the PSV system were 93.0%, 92.0%, 93.4%, 85.2%, and 96.6%, respectively. The accuracy, specificity, and PPV of the PSV system were superior to those of the VS system. However, the sensitivity and NPV did not significantly differ between the VS system and the PSV system. The VS system was inconclusive for 22 lesions (12.0%) and the PSV system was inconclusive for 11 lesions (6.0%). The PSV system could identify more suspicious lesions than the VS system.

Conclusions

We propose a new PSV diagnostic system by combining the VS system and the PP sign. Compared with the VS system, the PSV system could identify more suspected lesions and improve the diagnostic performance of EGC.

Graphical abstract

背景粉红区模式(PP)征是早期胃癌(EGC)在放大内镜窄带成像(ME-NBI)下的典型颜色改变。通过将颜色变化(PP征象)与 "血管加表面(VS)"分类系统相结合,我们开发了一种创新的EGC诊断系统,并将其命名为 "粉红微表面微血管(PSV)"系统。我们进行了一项单中心前瞻性临床研究(前后设计),包括两个不同时期的两项横断面研究。在研究前阶段,我们在 ME-NBI 下使用 VS 系统对 184 个疑似病灶进行了评估;在研究后阶段,我们使用 PSV 系统对 183 个疑似病灶进行了评估。我们比较了 VS 组和 PSV 组的诊断准确性、灵敏度、特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)和阴性预测值(NPV)。结果 VS 系统对 EGC 的准确性、灵敏度、特异性、PPV 和 NPV 分别为 84.6%、87.0%、83.6%、67.8% 和 94.2%,而 PSV 系统的准确性、灵敏度、特异性、PPV 和 NPV 分别为 93.0%、92.0%、93.4%、85.2% 和 96.6%。PSV 系统的准确性、特异性和 PPV 均优于 VS 系统。然而,VS 系统和 PSV 系统的灵敏度和 NPV 没有明显差异。VS 系统对 22 个病灶(12.0%)未得出结论,而 PSV 系统对 11 个病灶(6.0%)未得出结论。与 VS 系统相比,PSV 系统能识别出更多的可疑病变。与 VS 系统相比,PSV 系统能识别出更多的可疑病变,提高了 EGC 的诊断性能。
{"title":"A novel color-aided system for diagnosis of early gastric cancer using magnifying endoscopy with narrow-band imaging","authors":"Hui Zhang, Rongwei Ruan, Jin Fang, Jiangping Yu, Shengsen Chen, Yali Tao, Shuwen Zhu, Shi Wang","doi":"10.1007/s00464-024-11235-6","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-024-11235-6","url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Background</h3><p>The Pink Zone Pattern (PP) sign is a typical color alteration of early gastric cancer (EGC) under magnifying endoscopic narrow-band imaging (ME-NBI). By integrating the color changes (PP sign) with the “vessel plus surface (VS)” classification system, we developed an innovative diagnostic system for EGC and named it “Pink Microsurface Microvascular (PSV)” system. Here, we aimed to elucidate the diagnostic performance of the PSV system for EGC.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>We conducted a single-center prospective clinical study (before-after design) consisting of 2 cross-sectional studies at 2 separate periods. In the before phase, 184 suspected lesions were evaluated using the VS system under ME-NBI; in the after phase, 183 suspected lesions were evaluated using the PSV system. We compared the diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) between the VS group and the PSV group.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>The accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of the VS system for EGC were 84.6%, 87.0%, 83.6%, 67.8%, and 94.2%, respectively, and those for the PSV system were 93.0%, 92.0%, 93.4%, 85.2%, and 96.6%, respectively. The accuracy, specificity, and PPV of the PSV system were superior to those of the VS system. However, the sensitivity and NPV did not significantly differ between the VS system and the PSV system. The VS system was inconclusive for 22 lesions (12.0%) and the PSV system was inconclusive for 11 lesions (6.0%). The PSV system could identify more suspicious lesions than the VS system.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusions</h3><p>We propose a new PSV diagnostic system by combining the VS system and the PP sign. Compared with the VS system, the PSV system could identify more suspected lesions and improve the diagnostic performance of EGC.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Graphical abstract</h3>\u0000","PeriodicalId":501625,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Endoscopy","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142207261","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comparative anatomic and symptomatic recurrence outcomes of diaphragmatic suture cruroplasty versus biosynthetic mesh reinforcement in robotic hiatal and paraesophageal hernia repair 机器人食管裂孔疝和食管旁疝修补术中横膈膜缝合环成形术与生物合成网片加固术的解剖和症状复发结果比较
Pub Date : 2024-09-13 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-024-11257-0
Niloufar Salehi, Teagan Marshall, Blake Christianson, Hala Al Asadi, Haythem Najah, Yeon Joo Lee-Saxton, Abhinay Tumati, Parima Safe, Alexander Gavlin, Manjil Chatterji, Brendan M. Finnerty, Thomas J. Fahey, Rasa Zarnegar

Background

Hiatal and paraesophageal hernia (HH/PEH) recurrence is the most common cause of failure after gastroesophageal anti-reflux surgery. Crural reinforcement with mesh has been suggested to address this issue, but its efficacy remains debated. In this study, we aimed to determine the impact of biosynthetic mesh reinforcement compared to suture cruroplasty on anatomic and symptomatic hernia recurrence.

Method

Data of patients who underwent robotic HH/PEH repair with suture cruroplasty with or without biosynthetic mesh reinforcement between January 2012 and April 2024 were retrospectively reviewed. Gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms and anatomic hernia recurrence were assessed at short-term (3 months to 1 year) and longer-term (≥ 1 year) follow-up. Symptomatic hernia recurrence was defined as having both anatomic recurrence and symptoms.

Results

Out of the 503 patients in the study, 308 had undergone biosynthetic mesh repair, while 195 had suture-only repair. After the surgery, both groups demonstrated comparable improvements in symptoms. Short-term anatomic hernia recurrence rates were 11.8% and 15.6% for mesh and suture groups, respectively (p = 0.609), while longer-term rates were 24.7% and 44.9% (p = 0.015). The rates of symptomatic hernia recurrence in the same group were 8.8% and 14.6% in the short-term (p = 0.256), and 17.2% and 42.2% in longer-term follow-ups (p = 0.003). In the repair of medium and large-size hernias, mesh reinforcement resulted in a 50.0% relative risk reduction in anatomic hernia recurrences and a 59.2% reduction in symptomatic hernia recurrences at ≥ 1-year follow-up.

Conclusion

After more than a year of follow-up, it has been found that using biosynthetic mesh for medium and large hiatal or paraesophageal hernia repair significantly reduces the likelihood of both anatomic and symptomatic recurrence compared to using only suture cruroplasty. These findings strongly support the use of biosynthetic mesh to manage larger hernias. However, further long-term multicenter randomized studies are needed to provide more conclusive evidence.

背景食管裂孔和食管旁疝(HH/PEH)复发是胃食管反流手术失败的最常见原因。有人建议用网片加固硬膜来解决这一问题,但其效果仍存在争议。方法回顾性分析了2012年1月至2024年4月期间接受机器人HH/PEH修复术、缝合嵴成形术、生物合成网片加固或未加固的患者数据。在短期(3 个月至 1 年)和长期(≥ 1 年)随访中评估了胃食管反流病症状和解剖疝复发情况。有症状的疝复发被定义为既有解剖复发又有症状。结果在研究的 503 位患者中,308 位接受了生物合成网片修补术,195 位接受了单纯缝合修补术。术后,两组患者的症状改善情况相当。网片组和缝合组的短期解剖疝复发率分别为 11.8% 和 15.6%(P = 0.609),而长期复发率分别为 24.7% 和 44.9%(P = 0.015)。同组的无症状疝复发率短期分别为8.8%和14.6%(p = 0.256),长期随访分别为17.2%和42.2%(p = 0.003)。结论经过一年多的随访发现,在中型和大型食道裂孔疝或食道旁疝修补术中使用生物合成网片与仅使用缝合成形术相比,可显著降低解剖复发和症状复发的可能性。这些研究结果强烈支持使用生物合成网来处理较大的疝气。不过,还需要进一步的长期多中心随机研究来提供更确凿的证据。
{"title":"Comparative anatomic and symptomatic recurrence outcomes of diaphragmatic suture cruroplasty versus biosynthetic mesh reinforcement in robotic hiatal and paraesophageal hernia repair","authors":"Niloufar Salehi, Teagan Marshall, Blake Christianson, Hala Al Asadi, Haythem Najah, Yeon Joo Lee-Saxton, Abhinay Tumati, Parima Safe, Alexander Gavlin, Manjil Chatterji, Brendan M. Finnerty, Thomas J. Fahey, Rasa Zarnegar","doi":"10.1007/s00464-024-11257-0","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-024-11257-0","url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Background</h3><p>Hiatal and paraesophageal hernia (HH/PEH) recurrence is the most common cause of failure after gastroesophageal anti-reflux surgery. Crural reinforcement with mesh has been suggested to address this issue, but its efficacy remains debated. In this study, we aimed to determine the impact of biosynthetic mesh reinforcement compared to suture cruroplasty on anatomic and symptomatic hernia recurrence.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Method</h3><p>Data of patients who underwent robotic HH/PEH repair with suture cruroplasty with or without biosynthetic mesh reinforcement between January 2012 and April 2024 were retrospectively reviewed. Gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms and anatomic hernia recurrence were assessed at short-term (3 months to 1 year) and longer-term (≥ 1 year) follow-up. Symptomatic hernia recurrence was defined as having both anatomic recurrence and symptoms.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>Out of the 503 patients in the study, 308 had undergone biosynthetic mesh repair, while 195 had suture-only repair. After the surgery, both groups demonstrated comparable improvements in symptoms. Short-term anatomic hernia recurrence rates were 11.8% and 15.6% for mesh and suture groups, respectively (<i>p</i> = 0.609), while longer-term rates were 24.7% and 44.9% (<i>p</i> = 0.015). The rates of symptomatic hernia recurrence in the same group were 8.8% and 14.6% in the short-term (<i>p</i> = 0.256), and 17.2% and 42.2% in longer-term follow-ups (<i>p</i> = 0.003). In the repair of medium and large-size hernias, mesh reinforcement resulted in a 50.0% relative risk reduction in anatomic hernia recurrences and a 59.2% reduction in symptomatic hernia recurrences at ≥ 1-year follow-up.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>After more than a year of follow-up, it has been found that using biosynthetic mesh for medium and large hiatal or paraesophageal hernia repair significantly reduces the likelihood of both anatomic and symptomatic recurrence compared to using only suture cruroplasty. These findings strongly support the use of biosynthetic mesh to manage larger hernias. However, further long-term multicenter randomized studies are needed to provide more conclusive evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":501625,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Endoscopy","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142257916","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Surgical Endoscopy
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1