Pub Date : 2026-02-01Epub Date: 2024-07-31DOI: 10.1177/15266028241266218
Angelos Karelis, Björn Sonesson, Nuno V Dias
Purpose: To describe a novel technique for optimal orientation and accurate deployment of aortic endografts during complex endovascular aortic repair (cEVAR).
Technique: After establishing the femoral access in the standard fashion, a long large-bore dilator is inserted before the cEVAR delivery system. The dilator is advanced beyond the renovisceral segment noticing the degree of axial rotation. The endograft markers are verified with fluoroscopy outside the patient in the standard way. Thereafter, the cEVAR delivery system is pre-emptively rotated by the same degree in the opposite direction than the dilator showed upon insertion. The endograft is then advanced into position with the markers ending with the markers roughly in position. Minor adjustments are done before and during deployment if needed as per standard technique.
Conclusion: The use of long, large-bore dilator before the introduction of the aortic graft allows to proactively minimize the risk of endograft misalignment and malrotation especially in cases with challenging anatomies in both the visceral and iliac segments. This can potentially be used in all cases because it minimizes the manipulation of the delivery system and potentially increases the accuracy of endograft deployment.Clinical ImpactThis report describes a novel technique involving the use of a long large-bore dilator to predict the degree of rotation of the cEVAR delivery system during insertion and thereby enabling a pre-emptive compensation. This facilitates the precise orientation of the main aortic endograft with an easier alignment of any branches and/or fenestrations to their respective target arteries. This approach holds the potential to mitigate several of the difficulties commonly encountered with current cEVAR solutions, especially the challenges posed by small and tortuous access and severe angulation in the iliac and visceral aortic segment.
{"title":"The \"Pre-Rotating Dilator Technique\" for Optimal Endograft Orientation in Complex Endovascular Aortic Repair.","authors":"Angelos Karelis, Björn Sonesson, Nuno V Dias","doi":"10.1177/15266028241266218","DOIUrl":"10.1177/15266028241266218","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To describe a novel technique for optimal orientation and accurate deployment of aortic endografts during complex endovascular aortic repair (cEVAR).</p><p><strong>Technique: </strong>After establishing the femoral access in the standard fashion, a long large-bore dilator is inserted before the cEVAR delivery system. The dilator is advanced beyond the renovisceral segment noticing the degree of axial rotation. The endograft markers are verified with fluoroscopy outside the patient in the standard way. Thereafter, the cEVAR delivery system is pre-emptively rotated by the same degree in the opposite direction than the dilator showed upon insertion. The endograft is then advanced into position with the markers ending with the markers roughly in position. Minor adjustments are done before and during deployment if needed as per standard technique.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of long, large-bore dilator before the introduction of the aortic graft allows to proactively minimize the risk of endograft misalignment and malrotation especially in cases with challenging anatomies in both the visceral and iliac segments. This can potentially be used in all cases because it minimizes the manipulation of the delivery system and potentially increases the accuracy of endograft deployment.Clinical ImpactThis report describes a novel technique involving the use of a long large-bore dilator to predict the degree of rotation of the cEVAR delivery system during insertion and thereby enabling a pre-emptive compensation. This facilitates the precise orientation of the main aortic endograft with an easier alignment of any branches and/or fenestrations to their respective target arteries. This approach holds the potential to mitigate several of the difficulties commonly encountered with current cEVAR solutions, especially the challenges posed by small and tortuous access and severe angulation in the iliac and visceral aortic segment.</p>","PeriodicalId":50210,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Endovascular Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"150-154"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141857012","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01Epub Date: 2024-08-12DOI: 10.1177/15266028241266417
Athanasios Saratzis, Sarah Jane Messeder, Narayanan Thulasidasan
Purpose: Produce expert recommendations regarding the optimal use of Shockwave intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) when treating femoro-popliteal steno-occlusive peripheral artery disease (PAD), guiding operators to use Shockwave IVL.
Materials and methods: A modified 3-step Delphi process was used to gain consensus surrounding preoperative/intraoperative/postoperative considerations when using Shockwave IVL for femoro-popliteal PAD. This included a structured survey, focus-group (with qualitative thematic analysis of views expressed), and final confirmatory round; participants were recruited across Europe including the United Kingdom/Switzerland.
Results: Following a review to inform an online survey, 25 experts took part in a survey (5 European countries, 2023), followed by a focus-group (15 participants), 9 interviews, and final confirmatory round. A list of recommendations was prepared where at least moderate-level or high-level agreement was reached (≥70% participants agreeing). The recommendations relate to the optimal preoperative imaging, preoperative preparation(s), intraoperative imaging and use of adjuncts, as well as postoperative course, when using Shockwave IVL.
Conclusion: A list of expert recommendations is provided guiding the optimal use of Shockwave IVL in femoro-popliteal PAD. This will help operators achieve better clinical outcomes.Clinical ImpactThis pan-European panel of experts using intravascular lithotripsy in routine peripheral arterial disease endovascular practice has provided important insights into best care practices before, during, and after such procedures. Several recommendations have been produced based on a structured consensus process to guide clinicians globally. This will improve and standardise the use of this technology in the femoro-popliteal arterial segment.
{"title":"Shockwave Intravascular Lithotripsy Use in the Femoro-Popliteal Segment: Considerations From an Expert Pan-European Panel Regarding Best-Care Practice.","authors":"Athanasios Saratzis, Sarah Jane Messeder, Narayanan Thulasidasan","doi":"10.1177/15266028241266417","DOIUrl":"10.1177/15266028241266417","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Produce expert recommendations regarding the optimal use of Shockwave intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) when treating femoro-popliteal steno-occlusive peripheral artery disease (PAD), guiding operators to use Shockwave IVL.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A modified 3-step Delphi process was used to gain consensus surrounding preoperative/intraoperative/postoperative considerations when using Shockwave IVL for femoro-popliteal PAD. This included a structured survey, focus-group (with qualitative thematic analysis of views expressed), and final confirmatory round; participants were recruited across Europe including the United Kingdom/Switzerland.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Following a review to inform an online survey, 25 experts took part in a survey (5 European countries, 2023), followed by a focus-group (15 participants), 9 interviews, and final confirmatory round. A list of recommendations was prepared where at least moderate-level or high-level agreement was reached (≥70% participants agreeing). The recommendations relate to the optimal preoperative imaging, preoperative preparation(s), intraoperative imaging and use of adjuncts, as well as postoperative course, when using Shockwave IVL.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A list of expert recommendations is provided guiding the optimal use of Shockwave IVL in femoro-popliteal PAD. This will help operators achieve better clinical outcomes.Clinical ImpactThis pan-European panel of experts using intravascular lithotripsy in routine peripheral arterial disease endovascular practice has provided important insights into best care practices before, during, and after such procedures. Several recommendations have been produced based on a structured consensus process to guide clinicians globally. This will improve and standardise the use of this technology in the femoro-popliteal arterial segment.</p>","PeriodicalId":50210,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Endovascular Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"128-137"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12804419/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141917964","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01Epub Date: 2024-07-31DOI: 10.1177/15266028241266182
Paolo Spath, Filippo Maioli, Federica Campana, Teresa Gabellini, Annalisa Perulli, Michele Leone, Francesco Giacchi, Giacomo Di Iasio, Massimiliano Marini, Silvia Massini, Sara Pomatto, Cecilia Angherà, Salvatore Tarantini
<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This single-center study aimed to assess patients who underwent intentional percutaneous endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (pEVAR) with Hybrid Technique combining a single Perclose (Abbott, Abbott Park, Illinois) Suture-Mediated Closure Device + single Angio-Seal VIP 8F (Terumo, Tokyo, Japan) and compare outcomes with the standard Dual Perclose technique.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Consecutive elective pEVAR patients treated from November 2022 to November 2023, with healthy femoral accesses and introducer sheaths ≤20 French (F) outer diameter, were included. Coin-toss randomization determined whether a combination of single Perclose Device + single Angio-Seal VIP 8F (Hybrid Technique) or the standard double Perclose Devices (Dual Perclose) was used. In Hybrid Technique, a single Perclose device was positioned at 12 o'clock; a single Angio-Seal VIP 8F was placed after sheaths removal. Dual Perclose followed standard procedure. Primary endpoints included immediate hemostasis, sheath diameter differences, access conversion rate, technical success, and cost analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study involved 60 pEVAR patients (median age=78, interquartile range [IQR]=72-85 years) within the inclusion criteria. In 14 (24%) cases, only 1 femoral access was studied. There were 106 pEVAR accesses, with 58 (54.7%) in the Hybrid Technique group and 48 (45.3%) in the Dual Perclose group. Both groups exhibited homogeneity in pre-operative characteristics and sheath diameter (Hybrid Technique-16F vs Dual Perclose-18F; p=0.202). Immediate hemostasis was achieved in 100% of the Hybrid Technique group vs 87.5% for the Dual Perclose group (p=0.006). Surgical access conversion was unnecessary. Technical success was 100%, with all 6 femoral bleeding cases after Dual Perclose resolved endovascularly, using additional devices. Cost analysis showed a median cost of 330 euros (IQR=0) for the Hybrid Technique group vs 384 euros (IQR=360-456) for the Dual Perclose group (p<0.001). Thirty-day mortality was 3%, in 2 fragile patients, without access-related complications. Multivariate analysis identified Dual Perclose access (odds ratio [OR]=35.6; 95% confidence interval [CI]=18.3-36.8; p<0.001) and obesity (OR=19.7; 95% CI=1.4-23.9.5; p<0.001) as independent risk factors for immediate hemostasis failure. Median follow-up was 134 days (IQR=41-227), with 1 Hybrid Technique case (2%) successfully treated with thrombin injection for a small femoral pseudoaneurysm after 62 days.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The elective Hybrid Technique with combination of single Perclose Device + single Angio-Seal VIP 8F during pEVAR in selected patients appears to be non-inferior to the standard Dual Perclose procedure. It demonstrates a positive trend in reducing immediate hemostasis failure and costs. Both procedures achieved technical success and avoiding surgical access conversions.Clinical ImpactThis study introduces a nov
{"title":"Single-Center Experience on the Elective Hybrid Combination of Single Perclose + Angio-Seal VIP 8F Compared With Standard Dual Perclose During Percutaneous Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair.","authors":"Paolo Spath, Filippo Maioli, Federica Campana, Teresa Gabellini, Annalisa Perulli, Michele Leone, Francesco Giacchi, Giacomo Di Iasio, Massimiliano Marini, Silvia Massini, Sara Pomatto, Cecilia Angherà, Salvatore Tarantini","doi":"10.1177/15266028241266182","DOIUrl":"10.1177/15266028241266182","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This single-center study aimed to assess patients who underwent intentional percutaneous endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (pEVAR) with Hybrid Technique combining a single Perclose (Abbott, Abbott Park, Illinois) Suture-Mediated Closure Device + single Angio-Seal VIP 8F (Terumo, Tokyo, Japan) and compare outcomes with the standard Dual Perclose technique.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Consecutive elective pEVAR patients treated from November 2022 to November 2023, with healthy femoral accesses and introducer sheaths ≤20 French (F) outer diameter, were included. Coin-toss randomization determined whether a combination of single Perclose Device + single Angio-Seal VIP 8F (Hybrid Technique) or the standard double Perclose Devices (Dual Perclose) was used. In Hybrid Technique, a single Perclose device was positioned at 12 o'clock; a single Angio-Seal VIP 8F was placed after sheaths removal. Dual Perclose followed standard procedure. Primary endpoints included immediate hemostasis, sheath diameter differences, access conversion rate, technical success, and cost analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study involved 60 pEVAR patients (median age=78, interquartile range [IQR]=72-85 years) within the inclusion criteria. In 14 (24%) cases, only 1 femoral access was studied. There were 106 pEVAR accesses, with 58 (54.7%) in the Hybrid Technique group and 48 (45.3%) in the Dual Perclose group. Both groups exhibited homogeneity in pre-operative characteristics and sheath diameter (Hybrid Technique-16F vs Dual Perclose-18F; p=0.202). Immediate hemostasis was achieved in 100% of the Hybrid Technique group vs 87.5% for the Dual Perclose group (p=0.006). Surgical access conversion was unnecessary. Technical success was 100%, with all 6 femoral bleeding cases after Dual Perclose resolved endovascularly, using additional devices. Cost analysis showed a median cost of 330 euros (IQR=0) for the Hybrid Technique group vs 384 euros (IQR=360-456) for the Dual Perclose group (p<0.001). Thirty-day mortality was 3%, in 2 fragile patients, without access-related complications. Multivariate analysis identified Dual Perclose access (odds ratio [OR]=35.6; 95% confidence interval [CI]=18.3-36.8; p<0.001) and obesity (OR=19.7; 95% CI=1.4-23.9.5; p<0.001) as independent risk factors for immediate hemostasis failure. Median follow-up was 134 days (IQR=41-227), with 1 Hybrid Technique case (2%) successfully treated with thrombin injection for a small femoral pseudoaneurysm after 62 days.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The elective Hybrid Technique with combination of single Perclose Device + single Angio-Seal VIP 8F during pEVAR in selected patients appears to be non-inferior to the standard Dual Perclose procedure. It demonstrates a positive trend in reducing immediate hemostasis failure and costs. Both procedures achieved technical success and avoiding surgical access conversions.Clinical ImpactThis study introduces a nov","PeriodicalId":50210,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Endovascular Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"482-493"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141857011","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01Epub Date: 2024-08-15DOI: 10.1177/15266028241270680
Yu Xiong, Xuejing Gao, Lin Cui, Qiong Lyu, Bo Tu, Bo Chen, Ziming Wan
Objectives: Ultrasonography is more frequently used in patients with arteriovenous fistula (AVF) stenosis. The aim of this study is to use sonographic parameters for predicting primary patency in hemodialysis patients with venous valve-related stenosis (VVRS) who are treated by ultrasound-guided percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA).
Methods: A total of 229 VVRS patients who underwent PTA between January 2017 and December 2021 were enrolled. Clinical characteristics were retrospectively collected. Sonographic parameters were measured both before and after PTA. Univariate and multivariate Cox analyses were performed to identify independent factors associated with primary patency rate.
Results: All measured sonographic parameters improved after PTA compared to before PTA. Before PTA, the diameter of VVRS > 1.0 mm, age ≤ 57 years, and body mass index (BMI) > 21.57 kg/m2 were associated with better outcomes. While the diameter of radial artery, proximal radial artery close to the anastomosis, brachial artery, the flow volume of brachial artery, the length and peak velocity (PV) of the VVRS, and the diameter and PV after the VVRS had no association with the primary patency rate. After PTA, only patients with a diameter of VVRS > 4.0 mm had favorable outcome. In addition, patients with a gain of diameter of VVRS > 2.4 mm after PTA had a trend of better outcomes.
Conclusions: The diameter of VVRS before and after PTA could be served as markers to predict primary patency rate and second patency rate in AVF patients with VVRS. The gain of diameter of VVRS could also be a potential marker.Clinical ImpactUsing simple markers of sonographic parameters, we could quickly identify patients with a higher risk of restenosis. These patients should be followed more closely in case of restenosis at early. It is also beneficial to the prevention of thrombosis. These measures help to preserve more valuable vascular for a long-term dialysis. Additionally, the physician should pay more attention on the dialysis-related complications in these risky patients, such as hemodialysis-related hypotension.
{"title":"Assessment of Sonographic Parameters for Predicting Primary Patency Rate in Hemodialysis Patients With Venous Valve-Related Stenosis.","authors":"Yu Xiong, Xuejing Gao, Lin Cui, Qiong Lyu, Bo Tu, Bo Chen, Ziming Wan","doi":"10.1177/15266028241270680","DOIUrl":"10.1177/15266028241270680","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Ultrasonography is more frequently used in patients with arteriovenous fistula (AVF) stenosis. The aim of this study is to use sonographic parameters for predicting primary patency in hemodialysis patients with venous valve-related stenosis (VVRS) who are treated by ultrasound-guided percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 229 VVRS patients who underwent PTA between January 2017 and December 2021 were enrolled. Clinical characteristics were retrospectively collected. Sonographic parameters were measured both before and after PTA. Univariate and multivariate Cox analyses were performed to identify independent factors associated with primary patency rate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All measured sonographic parameters improved after PTA compared to before PTA. Before PTA, the diameter of VVRS > 1.0 mm, age ≤ 57 years, and body mass index (BMI) > 21.57 kg/m<sup>2</sup> were associated with better outcomes. While the diameter of radial artery, proximal radial artery close to the anastomosis, brachial artery, the flow volume of brachial artery, the length and peak velocity (PV) of the VVRS, and the diameter and PV after the VVRS had no association with the primary patency rate. After PTA, only patients with a diameter of VVRS > 4.0 mm had favorable outcome. In addition, patients with a gain of diameter of VVRS > 2.4 mm after PTA had a trend of better outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The diameter of VVRS before and after PTA could be served as markers to predict primary patency rate and second patency rate in AVF patients with VVRS. The gain of diameter of VVRS could also be a potential marker.Clinical ImpactUsing simple markers of sonographic parameters, we could quickly identify patients with a higher risk of restenosis. These patients should be followed more closely in case of restenosis at early. It is also beneficial to the prevention of thrombosis. These measures help to preserve more valuable vascular for a long-term dialysis. Additionally, the physician should pay more attention on the dialysis-related complications in these risky patients, such as hemodialysis-related hypotension.</p>","PeriodicalId":50210,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Endovascular Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"453-461"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141989347","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01Epub Date: 2024-05-22DOI: 10.1177/15266028241255528
M Massara, V Alberti, G Restifo, A Alberti, P Volpe
Periaortitis post endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) represents a very rare complication, described only in 10 cases between 2001 and 2023. It may appear early or late after EVAR and the majority of patients had ureter compression, and all patients were treated with high dose of corticosteroids, with a complete resolution of symptoms except for one patient. We report a literature review and a case of early post-EVAR periaortitis manifested with acute renal failure due to ureter compression, treated with urgent bilateral J stent and high dose of corticosteroid, with complete resolution of symptoms.Clinical ImpactEven if periaortitis secondary to EVAR is a very rare complication, it is important for the surgeon to know this possible rare complication and its characteristics, in order to immediately recognize it and treat it adequately to avoid complications.
{"title":"Periaortitis Secondary to Evar: Case Report and Literature Review.","authors":"M Massara, V Alberti, G Restifo, A Alberti, P Volpe","doi":"10.1177/15266028241255528","DOIUrl":"10.1177/15266028241255528","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Periaortitis post endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) represents a very rare complication, described only in 10 cases between 2001 and 2023. It may appear early or late after EVAR and the majority of patients had ureter compression, and all patients were treated with high dose of corticosteroids, with a complete resolution of symptoms except for one patient. We report a literature review and a case of early post-EVAR periaortitis manifested with acute renal failure due to ureter compression, treated with urgent bilateral J stent and high dose of corticosteroid, with complete resolution of symptoms.Clinical ImpactEven if periaortitis secondary to EVAR is a very rare complication, it is important for the surgeon to know this possible rare complication and its characteristics, in order to immediately recognize it and treat it adequately to avoid complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":50210,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Endovascular Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"351-357"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141082699","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01Epub Date: 2024-05-11DOI: 10.1177/15266028241252730
Miguel Godeiro Fernandez, Sarah Fernandez Coutinho de Carvalho, Bruna Almeida Martins, Felipe da Silva Mota Santos, Fernando Antonio Falcão Paixão Neto, Malu Oliveira de Araujo Medeiros, Patrick Bastos Metzger
Purpose: The objective of this study is to perform a meta-analysis comparing the effectiveness of uterine artery embolization (UAE) versus peripartum hysterectomy for acute refractory postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) control.
Materials and methods: We systematically searched 6 medical databases for studies comparing UAE and hysterectomy in PPH. Outcomes examined were mortality, hospitalization duration (HD) in days, and red blood cells (RBC) units utilization. Statistical analysis used RevMan 5.1.7 and random-effects models. Odds ratios (OR) and mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used for dichotomous and continuous outcomes, respectively.
Results: We included 833 patients from 4 cohort studies, with 583 (70%) undergoing UAE. The UAE population required fewer RBC units (MD: -7.39; 95% CI: -14.73 to -0.04; p=0.05) and had shorter HD (MD: -3.22; 95% CI: -5.42 to -1.02; p=0.004). Lower mortality rates were noted for UAE in the pooled analysis, but no statistical significance. Uterine artery embolization demonstrated lower procedural complications (16.45% vs. 28.8%), in which UAE had less ureter and bladder lesions (OR: 0.05; 95% CI: 0.01-0.38; p=0.004 and OR: 0.02; 95% CI: 0.00-0.15; p<0.001, respectively). Only 35 (6%) required conversion to hysterectomy, while 27 (4.6%) underwent re-embolization with 100% bleeding control. Uterine artery embolization did not hinder fertility, with normal menstruation restored in 19 patients with postoligomenorrhea.
Conclusion: Uterine artery embolization for the control of PPH is associated with lower use of RBC units and HD, but similar rates of mortality are noted when compared to hysterectomy. These results associated with uterine preservation could support its importance for refractory PPH management.Clinical ImpactUterine Artery Embolization is associated with a shorter hospitalization duration and reduced use of red blood cell units when compared with hysterectomy in refractory postpartum hemorrhage. Although demonstrating similar mortality rates, these findings, together with fertility preservation, support the method incorporation as a valuable option in obstetric services.
{"title":"Uterine Artery Embolization Versus Hysterectomy in Postpartum Hemorrhage: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Miguel Godeiro Fernandez, Sarah Fernandez Coutinho de Carvalho, Bruna Almeida Martins, Felipe da Silva Mota Santos, Fernando Antonio Falcão Paixão Neto, Malu Oliveira de Araujo Medeiros, Patrick Bastos Metzger","doi":"10.1177/15266028241252730","DOIUrl":"10.1177/15266028241252730","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The objective of this study is to perform a meta-analysis comparing the effectiveness of uterine artery embolization (UAE) versus peripartum hysterectomy for acute refractory postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) control.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We systematically searched 6 medical databases for studies comparing UAE and hysterectomy in PPH. Outcomes examined were mortality, hospitalization duration (HD) in days, and red blood cells (RBC) units utilization. Statistical analysis used RevMan 5.1.7 and random-effects models. Odds ratios (OR) and mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used for dichotomous and continuous outcomes, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 833 patients from 4 cohort studies, with 583 (70%) undergoing UAE. The UAE population required fewer RBC units (MD: -7.39; 95% CI: -14.73 to -0.04; p=0.05) and had shorter HD (MD: -3.22; 95% CI: -5.42 to -1.02; p=0.004). Lower mortality rates were noted for UAE in the pooled analysis, but no statistical significance. Uterine artery embolization demonstrated lower procedural complications (16.45% vs. 28.8%), in which UAE had less ureter and bladder lesions (OR: 0.05; 95% CI: 0.01-0.38; p=0.004 and OR: 0.02; 95% CI: 0.00-0.15; <i>p</i><0.001, respectively). Only 35 (6%) required conversion to hysterectomy, while 27 (4.6%) underwent re-embolization with 100% bleeding control. Uterine artery embolization did not hinder fertility, with normal menstruation restored in 19 patients with postoligomenorrhea.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Uterine artery embolization for the control of PPH is associated with lower use of RBC units and HD, but similar rates of mortality are noted when compared to hysterectomy. These results associated with uterine preservation could support its importance for refractory PPH management.Clinical ImpactUterine Artery Embolization is associated with a shorter hospitalization duration and reduced use of red blood cell units when compared with hysterectomy in refractory postpartum hemorrhage. Although demonstrating similar mortality rates, these findings, together with fertility preservation, support the method incorporation as a valuable option in obstetric services.</p>","PeriodicalId":50210,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Endovascular Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"78-87"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140909517","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01Epub Date: 2024-05-26DOI: 10.1177/15266028241253133
Vaiva Dabravolskaite, Lorenz Meuli, Ozan Yazar, Lee Bouwmann, Hozan Mufty, Geert Maleux, Pekka Aho, Harri Hakovirta, Maarit Venermo, Vladimir Makaloski
The risk of bridging stent occlusion after branched endovascular aortic repair (BEVAR) remains an issue. Currently, there is no clear recommendation on what kind of antithrombotic therapy should be installed after BEVAR. The aim of the study was to estimate the impact of postoperative antithrombotic therapy on bridging stent occlusion rate after elective BEVAR. An international multicenter retrospective analysis was performed in 4 European tertiary vascular units. All reno-visceral target vessels treated with bridging stents of patients undergoing elective BEVAR with the use of off-the-shelf or custom-made branched stent-grafts for pararenal aortic aneurysms (PAAs), type Ia endoleaks after previous EVAR, and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAA) between January 2014 and December 2022 were included. Primary outcome was freedom from bridging stent occlusion and its correlation with postoperative antithrombotic therapy. Secondary outcomes were overall survival and identifying target vessel and bridging stent characteristics, which may have a higher risk for bridging stent occlusion according to the PRINCE2SS recommendation. Follow-up information was obtained for all patients per 31st of December 2022. In total, 120 patients (90 male) with a median age of 72 (interquartile range [IQR]=67-77) years were included. Two hundred eighty-nine external and 127 internal branches were used for 416 target vessels. The median follow-up was 21 months (IQR=9-48) with a follow-up index of 1.0. During follow-up, 24 (5.8%) primary bridging stent occlusions (left renal artery [LRA]=10, right renal artery [RRA]=7, superior mesenteric artery [SMA]=3, truncus coeliacus [TC]=4) were found. The risk of renal bridging stent occlusion is significantly higher compared with visceral bridging stent, p=0.013. The occlusion rate was 7.8% for renal branches and 1.5% for visceral branches at 1 year and 10.6% and 3.7% at 5 years, respectively. The multivariable Cox proportional hazard model on bridging stent occlusion showed that there was no significant difference between the used antithrombotic strategies. No antithrombotic therapy was significantly associated with bridging stent occlusion, whereas no evidence for superiority of any other antithrombotic therapy was found. Overall, the bridging stents' occlusion rate was low. We found a significantly higher occlusion rate in renal arteries compared with the visceral ones.Clinical ImpactBased on our study, no antithrombotic therapy is significantly associated with bridging stent occlusion, and no evidence of the superiority of other antithrombotic therapy exists. Nevertehless, due to the low number of bridging stent occlusions, this study can neither support nor reject the PRINCE2SS recommendations. Further studies with larger cohorts are needed to determine clear guideliness of the best antithrombotic treatment regimen after complex enfovascular aortic repair.
{"title":"Antithrombotic Therapy and Freedom From Bridging Stent Occlusion After Elective Branched Endovascular Repair: A Multicenter International Cohort Study.","authors":"Vaiva Dabravolskaite, Lorenz Meuli, Ozan Yazar, Lee Bouwmann, Hozan Mufty, Geert Maleux, Pekka Aho, Harri Hakovirta, Maarit Venermo, Vladimir Makaloski","doi":"10.1177/15266028241253133","DOIUrl":"10.1177/15266028241253133","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The risk of bridging stent occlusion after branched endovascular aortic repair (BEVAR) remains an issue. Currently, there is no clear recommendation on what kind of antithrombotic therapy should be installed after BEVAR. The aim of the study was to estimate the impact of postoperative antithrombotic therapy on bridging stent occlusion rate after elective BEVAR. An international multicenter retrospective analysis was performed in 4 European tertiary vascular units. All reno-visceral target vessels treated with bridging stents of patients undergoing elective BEVAR with the use of off-the-shelf or custom-made branched stent-grafts for pararenal aortic aneurysms (PAAs), type Ia endoleaks after previous EVAR, and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAA) between January 2014 and December 2022 were included. Primary outcome was freedom from bridging stent occlusion and its correlation with postoperative antithrombotic therapy. Secondary outcomes were overall survival and identifying target vessel and bridging stent characteristics, which may have a higher risk for bridging stent occlusion according to the PRINCE2SS recommendation. Follow-up information was obtained for all patients per 31st of December 2022. In total, 120 patients (90 male) with a median age of 72 (interquartile range [IQR]=67-77) years were included. Two hundred eighty-nine external and 127 internal branches were used for 416 target vessels. The median follow-up was 21 months (IQR=9-48) with a follow-up index of 1.0. During follow-up, 24 (5.8%) primary bridging stent occlusions (left renal artery [LRA]=10, right renal artery [RRA]=7, superior mesenteric artery [SMA]=3, truncus coeliacus [TC]=4) were found. The risk of renal bridging stent occlusion is significantly higher compared with visceral bridging stent, p=0.013. The occlusion rate was 7.8% for renal branches and 1.5% for visceral branches at 1 year and 10.6% and 3.7% at 5 years, respectively. The multivariable Cox proportional hazard model on bridging stent occlusion showed that there was no significant difference between the used antithrombotic strategies. No antithrombotic therapy was significantly associated with bridging stent occlusion, whereas no evidence for superiority of any other antithrombotic therapy was found. Overall, the bridging stents' occlusion rate was low. We found a significantly higher occlusion rate in renal arteries compared with the visceral ones.Clinical ImpactBased on our study, no antithrombotic therapy is significantly associated with bridging stent occlusion, and no evidence of the superiority of other antithrombotic therapy exists. Nevertehless, due to the low number of bridging stent occlusions, this study can neither support nor reject the PRINCE2SS recommendations. Further studies with larger cohorts are needed to determine clear guideliness of the best antithrombotic treatment regimen after complex enfovascular aortic repair.</p>","PeriodicalId":50210,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Endovascular Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"276-284"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12804412/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141155778","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01Epub Date: 2024-06-03DOI: 10.1177/15266028241256521
Kaige Deng, Yiyun Xie, Jiang Shao, Zhichao Lai, Yongchang Zheng, Bao Liu
Clinical ImpactThis article showed images of a patient with idiopathic serial right internal mammary artery true aneurysms treated by endovascular embolization, which is a rare diagnosis and should be considered in differential diagnosis of paratracheal mass.
{"title":"Endovascular Embolization for Idiopathic Serial Right Internal Mammary Artery Aneurysms.","authors":"Kaige Deng, Yiyun Xie, Jiang Shao, Zhichao Lai, Yongchang Zheng, Bao Liu","doi":"10.1177/15266028241256521","DOIUrl":"10.1177/15266028241256521","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Clinical ImpactThis article showed images of a patient with idiopathic serial right internal mammary artery true aneurysms treated by endovascular embolization, which is a rare diagnosis and should be considered in differential diagnosis of paratracheal mass.</p>","PeriodicalId":50210,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Endovascular Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"35-37"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141200653","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01Epub Date: 2024-05-30DOI: 10.1177/15266028241256507
Miltiadis Matsagkas, Konstantinos Spanos, Athanasios Haidoulis, George Kouvelos, Konstantinos Dakis, Elena Arnaoutoglou, Athanasios Giannoukas
Introduction: The distal landing zone in iliac arteries represents an important issue during endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms (EVAR). The aim of this study is to present a case series for landing in the external iliac artery (EIA) during EVAR while preserving blood flow in the internal iliac artery (IIA) with the covered endovascular reconstruction of the iliac bifurcation (CERIB) technique.
Methods: This is a single-center, retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data of patients that underwent EVAR either for intact abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) or previous failed EVAR from December 2022 up to September 2023. Indications for treatment were presence of common iliac artery aneurysm (CIAA), short CIA, or endoleak type Ib (ETIb). For the distal sealing zone, we used balloon-expandable covered stent (BXCS). Primary outcomes were technical success and first-month patency rate. Secondary outcomes were endoleak and re-intervention rate.
Results: Sixteen patients being treated with 20 CERIBs were included in the study. Four patients had a previous failed EVAR, while 3 patients were treated urgently for a symptomatic para-renal aneurysm. The indications for treatment were EIb (n=2), short CIA (n=4), CIAA with narrow lumen (n=3), and CIA aneurysm (n=11). Platforms that were used were the Cook Zenith Alpha (n=5), Gore C3 (n=2 and 3 limbs), Endurant IIs (n=2, and 3 limbs), and a t-branch device (n=3). Technical success rate was 100% with no adjunctive procedure. No death or re-intervention was recorded for all patients at postoperative 30-day period and at 6 months for 2 patients. At first-month CTA, patency rate was 100% (20/20), while in 2 patients that had 6-month CTA, the patency was also 100% (2/2). No kinking or stenosis was also noted. Two patients had ETIII after branched EVAR (BEVAR), 2 patients had ETII, and 1 patient had gutter ET in the area of the CERIB.
Conclusion: The CERIB technique seems to be effective and safe in the early period. It is suitable with a variety of commercial endograft platforms. It may be a valuable alternative to iliac branch devices when there are anatomical considerations. Longer follow-up is needed to conclude for long-term patency and durability.Clinical ImpactThe distal landing zone in iliac arteries represents an important issue during EVAR while it is important to preserve blood flow in the internal iliac artery. The covered endovascular reconstruction of the iliac bifurcation (CERIB) technique is a technique for the preservation of internal iliac arteries during EVAR, while it is suitable with a variety of commercial endograft platforms. The CERIB technique seems to be effective and safe in the early period. It may be valuable alternative to iliac branch devices when there are anatomical considerations.
{"title":"Initial Experience of the Covered Endovascular Reconstruction of Iliac Bifurcation Technique.","authors":"Miltiadis Matsagkas, Konstantinos Spanos, Athanasios Haidoulis, George Kouvelos, Konstantinos Dakis, Elena Arnaoutoglou, Athanasios Giannoukas","doi":"10.1177/15266028241256507","DOIUrl":"10.1177/15266028241256507","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The distal landing zone in iliac arteries represents an important issue during endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms (EVAR). The aim of this study is to present a case series for landing in the external iliac artery (EIA) during EVAR while preserving blood flow in the internal iliac artery (IIA) with the covered endovascular reconstruction of the iliac bifurcation (CERIB) technique.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a single-center, retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data of patients that underwent EVAR either for intact abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) or previous failed EVAR from December 2022 up to September 2023. Indications for treatment were presence of common iliac artery aneurysm (CIAA), short CIA, or endoleak type Ib (ETIb). For the distal sealing zone, we used balloon-expandable covered stent (BXCS). Primary outcomes were technical success and first-month patency rate. Secondary outcomes were endoleak and re-intervention rate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixteen patients being treated with 20 CERIBs were included in the study. Four patients had a previous failed EVAR, while 3 patients were treated urgently for a symptomatic para-renal aneurysm. The indications for treatment were EIb (n=2), short CIA (n=4), CIAA with narrow lumen (n=3), and CIA aneurysm (n=11). Platforms that were used were the Cook Zenith Alpha (n=5), Gore C3 (n=2 and 3 limbs), Endurant IIs (n=2, and 3 limbs), and a t-branch device (n=3). Technical success rate was 100% with no adjunctive procedure. No death or re-intervention was recorded for all patients at postoperative 30-day period and at 6 months for 2 patients. At first-month CTA, patency rate was 100% (20/20), while in 2 patients that had 6-month CTA, the patency was also 100% (2/2). No kinking or stenosis was also noted. Two patients had ETIII after branched EVAR (BEVAR), 2 patients had ETII, and 1 patient had gutter ET in the area of the CERIB.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The CERIB technique seems to be effective and safe in the early period. It is suitable with a variety of commercial endograft platforms. It may be a valuable alternative to iliac branch devices when there are anatomical considerations. Longer follow-up is needed to conclude for long-term patency and durability.Clinical ImpactThe distal landing zone in iliac arteries represents an important issue during EVAR while it is important to preserve blood flow in the internal iliac artery. The covered endovascular reconstruction of the iliac bifurcation (CERIB) technique is a technique for the preservation of internal iliac arteries during EVAR, while it is suitable with a variety of commercial endograft platforms. The CERIB technique seems to be effective and safe in the early period. It may be valuable alternative to iliac branch devices when there are anatomical considerations.</p>","PeriodicalId":50210,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Endovascular Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"316-324"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141176325","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01Epub Date: 2024-06-02DOI: 10.1177/15266028241255544
Ashraf Gamal Taha, Kerolos R Basta, Mohammed Shahat, Ahmed Khairy Sayed Ahmed
<p><strong>Background: </strong>Standard balloon-catheter thromboembolectomy (TE) is an established effective treatment for acute lower-limb ischemia (ALI) with recognized limitations when there is an underlying arterial lesion or thromboembolism of the infrapopliteal arteries. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of image-guided surgical TE combined with routine intraoperative completion angiography in the treatment of ALI patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between September 2020 and August 2022, this prospective study included all consecutive adult patients presenting to a tertiary center with unilateral ALI of Rutherford class II due to thromboembolic occlusion of native arteries who underwent image-guided surgical TE and routine completion intraoperative angiography. Adjunctive endovascular techniques (hybrid revascularization) including plain balloon angioplasty (PTA)±stenting or on-table lysis were used if underlying arterial lesions or residual thrombosis were detected on the intraoperative angiography, respectively. The primary outcome measures included technical success and 30-day major amputation rate. Perioperative complications, 1-year primary and secondary patency, limb salvage, mortality, and amputation-free survival rates were endorsed as secondary outcome measures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Image-guided surgical thrombectomy was done for 109 ALI patients (109 limbs), provisionally diagnosed as embolic (57 patients, 52.3%) or thrombotic (52 patients, 47.7%) arterial occlusion. Thromboembolectomy without adjunctive endovascular treatment was done in 38 patients (34.86%), whereas 71 patients (65.14%) required adjunctive PTA±stenting of underlying arterial lesions (60, 55.05%) or on-table lysis±PTA of residual thrombosis (11, 10.09%). The overall technical success rate was 92.66%. At 30 days, amputation and mortality rates were 3.67% and 5.5%, respectively. None of the patients had thrombectomy-induced arterial injuries. One-year follow-up data were available for 81 patients (74.3%). The Kaplan-Meier estimate of the 12-month primary and secondary patency, limb salvage, and amputation-free survival rates was 76.5%±0.04, 91.5%±0.03, 90.6±0.03, and 91.4±0.03%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Image-guided TE combined with routine intraoperative angiography is a safe and effective technique for surgical TE in acute lower-limb ischemia patients with the advantage of immediate identification and treatment of underlying arterial lesions or residual thrombosis for optimal revascularization.Clinical ImpactThe present study has confirmed the safety and effectiveness of image-guided thromboembolectomy combined with routine use of intraoperative angiography during surgical treatment of acute lower limb ischemia in terms of immediate identification and treatment of underlying arterial lesions or residual thrombosis for optimal revascularization. This technique also facilitates selective passag
背景:标准的球囊导管血栓栓塞切除术(TE)是治疗急性下肢缺血(ALI)的有效方法,但当存在潜在的动脉病变或膝下动脉血栓栓塞时,TE的局限性已得到公认。本研究旨在评估图像引导手术 TE 结合常规术中完成血管造影治疗 ALI 患者的有效性和安全性:2020年9月至2022年8月期间,这项前瞻性研究纳入了所有因血栓栓塞闭塞原生动脉导致单侧卢瑟福II级ALI而前往三级中心就诊并接受图像引导手术TE和常规术中完成血管造影的连续成年患者。如果在术中血管造影中发现潜在动脉病变或残余血栓,则分别采用辅助血管内技术(混合血管再通),包括普通球囊血管成形术(PTA)±支架植入术或台上溶栓术。主要结果指标包括技术成功率和30天主要截肢率。围手术期并发症、1年主要和次要通畅率、肢体挽救率、死亡率和无截肢生存率作为次要结果指标:109例ALI患者(109条肢体)在图像引导下接受了手术血栓切除术,初步诊断为栓塞性(57例患者,52.3%)或血栓性(52例患者,47.7%)动脉闭塞。38名患者(34.86%)在未辅助血管内治疗的情况下进行了血栓栓塞切除术,而71名患者(65.14%)需要辅助PTA±支架植入术治疗潜在的动脉病变(60名,55.05%)或在台上溶栓±PTA治疗残余血栓(11名,10.09%)。总体技术成功率为 92.66%。30天后,截肢率和死亡率分别为3.67%和5.5%。没有一名患者因血栓切除术导致动脉损伤。81名患者(74.3%)获得了一年的随访数据。12个月主要和次要通畅率、肢体挽救率和无截肢生存率的卡普兰-梅耶估计值分别为76.5%±0.04、91.5%±0.03、90.6±0.03和91.4±0.03%:图像引导下的TE结合常规术中血管造影是一种安全有效的技术,适用于急性下肢缺血患者的外科TE,其优势在于可立即识别和治疗潜在的动脉病变或残余血栓,以实现最佳的血管再通:本研究证实,在急性下肢缺血的手术治疗过程中,图像引导下的血栓栓塞切除术与术中血管造影术的常规应用既安全又有效,可立即识别和治疗潜在的动脉病变或残余血栓,以实现最佳的血管再通。这项技术还有助于选择性地将 Fogarty 球囊导管从股动脉进入腘下动脉,而传统的做法是在区域或全身麻醉下探查腘三叉动脉或胫骨动脉。使用这种技术可以指导手术外科医生对球囊进行适当的操作和充气,以避免先天性血管损伤。
{"title":"Mid-term Outcomes of Image-Guided Surgical Thromboembolectomy and Routine Intraoperative Angiography for Native Vessel Acute Lower-Limb-Threatening Ischemia.","authors":"Ashraf Gamal Taha, Kerolos R Basta, Mohammed Shahat, Ahmed Khairy Sayed Ahmed","doi":"10.1177/15266028241255544","DOIUrl":"10.1177/15266028241255544","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Standard balloon-catheter thromboembolectomy (TE) is an established effective treatment for acute lower-limb ischemia (ALI) with recognized limitations when there is an underlying arterial lesion or thromboembolism of the infrapopliteal arteries. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of image-guided surgical TE combined with routine intraoperative completion angiography in the treatment of ALI patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between September 2020 and August 2022, this prospective study included all consecutive adult patients presenting to a tertiary center with unilateral ALI of Rutherford class II due to thromboembolic occlusion of native arteries who underwent image-guided surgical TE and routine completion intraoperative angiography. Adjunctive endovascular techniques (hybrid revascularization) including plain balloon angioplasty (PTA)±stenting or on-table lysis were used if underlying arterial lesions or residual thrombosis were detected on the intraoperative angiography, respectively. The primary outcome measures included technical success and 30-day major amputation rate. Perioperative complications, 1-year primary and secondary patency, limb salvage, mortality, and amputation-free survival rates were endorsed as secondary outcome measures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Image-guided surgical thrombectomy was done for 109 ALI patients (109 limbs), provisionally diagnosed as embolic (57 patients, 52.3%) or thrombotic (52 patients, 47.7%) arterial occlusion. Thromboembolectomy without adjunctive endovascular treatment was done in 38 patients (34.86%), whereas 71 patients (65.14%) required adjunctive PTA±stenting of underlying arterial lesions (60, 55.05%) or on-table lysis±PTA of residual thrombosis (11, 10.09%). The overall technical success rate was 92.66%. At 30 days, amputation and mortality rates were 3.67% and 5.5%, respectively. None of the patients had thrombectomy-induced arterial injuries. One-year follow-up data were available for 81 patients (74.3%). The Kaplan-Meier estimate of the 12-month primary and secondary patency, limb salvage, and amputation-free survival rates was 76.5%±0.04, 91.5%±0.03, 90.6±0.03, and 91.4±0.03%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Image-guided TE combined with routine intraoperative angiography is a safe and effective technique for surgical TE in acute lower-limb ischemia patients with the advantage of immediate identification and treatment of underlying arterial lesions or residual thrombosis for optimal revascularization.Clinical ImpactThe present study has confirmed the safety and effectiveness of image-guided thromboembolectomy combined with routine use of intraoperative angiography during surgical treatment of acute lower limb ischemia in terms of immediate identification and treatment of underlying arterial lesions or residual thrombosis for optimal revascularization. This technique also facilitates selective passag","PeriodicalId":50210,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Endovascular Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"341-350"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141200725","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}