Objectives: Ultrasonography is more frequently used in patients with arteriovenous fistula (AVF) stenosis. The aim of this study is to use sonographic parameters for predicting primary patency in hemodialysis patients with venous valve-related stenosis (VVRS) who are treated by ultrasound-guided percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA).
Methods: A total of 229 VVRS patients who underwent PTA between January 2017 and December 2021 were enrolled. Clinical characteristics were retrospectively collected. Sonographic parameters were measured both before and after PTA. Univariate and multivariate Cox analyses were performed to identify independent factors associated with primary patency rate.
Results: All measured sonographic parameters improved after PTA compared to before PTA. Before PTA, the diameter of VVRS > 1.0 mm, age ≤ 57 years, and body mass index (BMI) > 21.57 kg/m2 were associated with better outcomes. While the diameter of radial artery, proximal radial artery close to the anastomosis, brachial artery, the flow volume of brachial artery, the length and peak velocity (PV) of the VVRS, and the diameter and PV after the VVRS had no association with the primary patency rate. After PTA, only patients with a diameter of VVRS > 4.0 mm had favorable outcome. In addition, patients with a gain of diameter of VVRS > 2.4 mm after PTA had a trend of better outcomes.
Conclusions: The diameter of VVRS before and after PTA could be served as markers to predict primary patency rate and second patency rate in AVF patients with VVRS. The gain of diameter of VVRS could also be a potential marker.Clinical ImpactUsing simple markers of sonographic parameters, we could quickly identify patients with a higher risk of restenosis. These patients should be followed more closely in case of restenosis at early. It is also beneficial to the prevention of thrombosis. These measures help to preserve more valuable vascular for a long-term dialysis. Additionally, the physician should pay more attention on the dialysis-related complications in these risky patients, such as hemodialysis-related hypotension.
Periaortitis post endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) represents a very rare complication, described only in 10 cases between 2001 and 2023. It may appear early or late after EVAR and the majority of patients had ureter compression, and all patients were treated with high dose of corticosteroids, with a complete resolution of symptoms except for one patient. We report a literature review and a case of early post-EVAR periaortitis manifested with acute renal failure due to ureter compression, treated with urgent bilateral J stent and high dose of corticosteroid, with complete resolution of symptoms.Clinical ImpactEven if periaortitis secondary to EVAR is a very rare complication, it is important for the surgeon to know this possible rare complication and its characteristics, in order to immediately recognize it and treat it adequately to avoid complications.
Purpose: The objective of this study is to perform a meta-analysis comparing the effectiveness of uterine artery embolization (UAE) versus peripartum hysterectomy for acute refractory postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) control.
Materials and methods: We systematically searched 6 medical databases for studies comparing UAE and hysterectomy in PPH. Outcomes examined were mortality, hospitalization duration (HD) in days, and red blood cells (RBC) units utilization. Statistical analysis used RevMan 5.1.7 and random-effects models. Odds ratios (OR) and mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used for dichotomous and continuous outcomes, respectively.
Results: We included 833 patients from 4 cohort studies, with 583 (70%) undergoing UAE. The UAE population required fewer RBC units (MD: -7.39; 95% CI: -14.73 to -0.04; p=0.05) and had shorter HD (MD: -3.22; 95% CI: -5.42 to -1.02; p=0.004). Lower mortality rates were noted for UAE in the pooled analysis, but no statistical significance. Uterine artery embolization demonstrated lower procedural complications (16.45% vs. 28.8%), in which UAE had less ureter and bladder lesions (OR: 0.05; 95% CI: 0.01-0.38; p=0.004 and OR: 0.02; 95% CI: 0.00-0.15; p<0.001, respectively). Only 35 (6%) required conversion to hysterectomy, while 27 (4.6%) underwent re-embolization with 100% bleeding control. Uterine artery embolization did not hinder fertility, with normal menstruation restored in 19 patients with postoligomenorrhea.
Conclusion: Uterine artery embolization for the control of PPH is associated with lower use of RBC units and HD, but similar rates of mortality are noted when compared to hysterectomy. These results associated with uterine preservation could support its importance for refractory PPH management.Clinical ImpactUterine Artery Embolization is associated with a shorter hospitalization duration and reduced use of red blood cell units when compared with hysterectomy in refractory postpartum hemorrhage. Although demonstrating similar mortality rates, these findings, together with fertility preservation, support the method incorporation as a valuable option in obstetric services.
The risk of bridging stent occlusion after branched endovascular aortic repair (BEVAR) remains an issue. Currently, there is no clear recommendation on what kind of antithrombotic therapy should be installed after BEVAR. The aim of the study was to estimate the impact of postoperative antithrombotic therapy on bridging stent occlusion rate after elective BEVAR. An international multicenter retrospective analysis was performed in 4 European tertiary vascular units. All reno-visceral target vessels treated with bridging stents of patients undergoing elective BEVAR with the use of off-the-shelf or custom-made branched stent-grafts for pararenal aortic aneurysms (PAAs), type Ia endoleaks after previous EVAR, and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAA) between January 2014 and December 2022 were included. Primary outcome was freedom from bridging stent occlusion and its correlation with postoperative antithrombotic therapy. Secondary outcomes were overall survival and identifying target vessel and bridging stent characteristics, which may have a higher risk for bridging stent occlusion according to the PRINCE2SS recommendation. Follow-up information was obtained for all patients per 31st of December 2022. In total, 120 patients (90 male) with a median age of 72 (interquartile range [IQR]=67-77) years were included. Two hundred eighty-nine external and 127 internal branches were used for 416 target vessels. The median follow-up was 21 months (IQR=9-48) with a follow-up index of 1.0. During follow-up, 24 (5.8%) primary bridging stent occlusions (left renal artery [LRA]=10, right renal artery [RRA]=7, superior mesenteric artery [SMA]=3, truncus coeliacus [TC]=4) were found. The risk of renal bridging stent occlusion is significantly higher compared with visceral bridging stent, p=0.013. The occlusion rate was 7.8% for renal branches and 1.5% for visceral branches at 1 year and 10.6% and 3.7% at 5 years, respectively. The multivariable Cox proportional hazard model on bridging stent occlusion showed that there was no significant difference between the used antithrombotic strategies. No antithrombotic therapy was significantly associated with bridging stent occlusion, whereas no evidence for superiority of any other antithrombotic therapy was found. Overall, the bridging stents' occlusion rate was low. We found a significantly higher occlusion rate in renal arteries compared with the visceral ones.Clinical ImpactBased on our study, no antithrombotic therapy is significantly associated with bridging stent occlusion, and no evidence of the superiority of other antithrombotic therapy exists. Nevertehless, due to the low number of bridging stent occlusions, this study can neither support nor reject the PRINCE2SS recommendations. Further studies with larger cohorts are needed to determine clear guideliness of the best antithrombotic treatment regimen after complex enfovascular aortic repair.
Clinical ImpactThis article showed images of a patient with idiopathic serial right internal mammary artery true aneurysms treated by endovascular embolization, which is a rare diagnosis and should be considered in differential diagnosis of paratracheal mass.
Introduction: The distal landing zone in iliac arteries represents an important issue during endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms (EVAR). The aim of this study is to present a case series for landing in the external iliac artery (EIA) during EVAR while preserving blood flow in the internal iliac artery (IIA) with the covered endovascular reconstruction of the iliac bifurcation (CERIB) technique.
Methods: This is a single-center, retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data of patients that underwent EVAR either for intact abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) or previous failed EVAR from December 2022 up to September 2023. Indications for treatment were presence of common iliac artery aneurysm (CIAA), short CIA, or endoleak type Ib (ETIb). For the distal sealing zone, we used balloon-expandable covered stent (BXCS). Primary outcomes were technical success and first-month patency rate. Secondary outcomes were endoleak and re-intervention rate.
Results: Sixteen patients being treated with 20 CERIBs were included in the study. Four patients had a previous failed EVAR, while 3 patients were treated urgently for a symptomatic para-renal aneurysm. The indications for treatment were EIb (n=2), short CIA (n=4), CIAA with narrow lumen (n=3), and CIA aneurysm (n=11). Platforms that were used were the Cook Zenith Alpha (n=5), Gore C3 (n=2 and 3 limbs), Endurant IIs (n=2, and 3 limbs), and a t-branch device (n=3). Technical success rate was 100% with no adjunctive procedure. No death or re-intervention was recorded for all patients at postoperative 30-day period and at 6 months for 2 patients. At first-month CTA, patency rate was 100% (20/20), while in 2 patients that had 6-month CTA, the patency was also 100% (2/2). No kinking or stenosis was also noted. Two patients had ETIII after branched EVAR (BEVAR), 2 patients had ETII, and 1 patient had gutter ET in the area of the CERIB.
Conclusion: The CERIB technique seems to be effective and safe in the early period. It is suitable with a variety of commercial endograft platforms. It may be a valuable alternative to iliac branch devices when there are anatomical considerations. Longer follow-up is needed to conclude for long-term patency and durability.Clinical ImpactThe distal landing zone in iliac arteries represents an important issue during EVAR while it is important to preserve blood flow in the internal iliac artery. The covered endovascular reconstruction of the iliac bifurcation (CERIB) technique is a technique for the preservation of internal iliac arteries during EVAR, while it is suitable with a variety of commercial endograft platforms. The CERIB technique seems to be effective and safe in the early period. It may be valuable alternative to iliac branch devices when there are anatomical considerations.
Background: This review aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of bifurcated endografts in the treatment of aortoiliac disease (AOID).
Methods: A systematic search on PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science was performed. The primary endpoint was primary patency, whereas secondary endpoints included reintervention, technical, clinical success, and overall postoperative complications.
Results: Ten studies with a total of 365 patients were included in this review. Most included studies used the AFX unibody endograft, one study the Excluder endograft, and one the Powerlink endograft. The majority of included patients displayed TransAtlantic InterSociety Consensus (TASC) D aortoiliac lesions (56.1% 205/365). The pooled primary patency estimates at 12, 24, and 36 months were 93.93% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 87.7-100), 91.46% (95% CI: 84.6-98.8), and 90.25% (95% CI: 82.6-98.6), respectively. The mean primary patency time was 85.74 months (95% CI: 71.99-86.88). The pooled freedom from reintervention estimates at 12, 24, and 36 months were 91.94% (95% CI: 81.4-100), 91.03% (95% CI: 79.8-100), and 91.03% (95% CI: 79.8-100), respectively. The pooled estimates of major complications (rupture, graft thrombosis, amputation) were 11.12% (95% CI, 0.05%-3.03%), 3.76% (0.32%-9.45%), and 0.38% (0%-2.59%), whereas the pooled estimates for minor complications (hematoma, groin infection, dissection) and overall mortality were 5.27% (95% CI, 1.11%-11.38%), 6.93% (95% CI, 2.94%-12.16%), 2.19% (95% CI, 0.06%-6.14%), and1.57% (95% CI, 0.13-3.97), respectively. Technical and clinical success estimates were 99.92% (95% CI: 98.86%-100%) and 99.47% (95% CI: 94.92%-100%), respectively.
Conclusion: The application of bifurcated endografts may present a safe and viable option in the treatment of AOID, with preliminary results indicating promising primary patency outcomes. However, the definitive assessment of their efficacy and safety will be better determined through long-term follow-up studies and high-quality randomized controlled trials, which are essential to substantiate these initial findings.Clinical ImpactBifurcated endograft application may be a safe and viable alternative for high-risk patients with complex AOID TASC C and D lesions with encouraging primary patency outcomes potentially comparable to those of open surgery. Non-negligible postoperative complication rates were also noted. High-quality randomized controlled trials and studies comparing CERAB, kissing stenting, and the use bifurcated endografts for the treatment of AOID is necessary to draw more definite conclusions.
Purpose: Our study aimed to investigate the relationship between fluctuations in different blood pressure (BP) components within 72 hours following endovascular therapy (EVT) and the prognosis of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients.
Methods: This prospective multicenter study included 283 AIS patients who underwent EVT and had available BP data. The primary outcome was the ordinal modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score evaluated at 90 days. The secondary outcome was a combination of death and major disability, defined as an mRS score of 3 to 6 within 3 months.
Results: After adjusting for imbalanced variables, the highest tertile of systolic blood pressure (SBP) fluctuation had an odds ratio (OR) of 1.747 (95% confidence interval [CI]=1.031-2.961; p for trend=0.035) for the primary outcome and 1.889 (95% CI=1.015-3.516; p for trend=0.039) for the secondary outcome, respectively. Fluctuations in diastolic blood pressure (DBP) (OR=1.914, 95% CI=1.134-3.230, p for trend=0.015) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) (OR=1.759, 95% CI=1.026-3.015, p for trend=0.039) were only associated with the primary outcome. The multivariate-adjusted restricted cubic spline analyses supported these findings. Furthermore, the fluctuations in both SBP and MAP exhibited the significant discriminatory capability in predicting the prognosis, comparable to their mean values.
Conclusion: Our study revealed that larger fluctuations in SBP, DBP, and MAP within 72 hours after EVT were associated with a higher risk of poor clinical outcomes within 3 months in AIS patients. Controlling BP fluctuations may be valuable for improving the prognosis in patients undergoing EVT.Clinical ImpactHow will this change clinical practice?It provides physicians a new approach to directly monitor BP fluctuations over an extended observation period in AIS patients after EVT in routine clinical practice.What does it mean for the clinicians?These results underscore the importance of giving equal attention to controlling long-term BP fluctuations, in addition to managing mean BP, as a means to improve the prognosis of AIS patients after EVT.What is the innovation behind the study?This study systematically evaluated the association between fluctuations in different blood pressure components and clinical outcomes in AIS patients over an extended period following EVT.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：