Pub Date : 2025-10-24DOI: 10.1097/DBP.0000000000001433
Kelsey L Thompson, Jinhee Park, Cara McComish, Suzanne Thoyre, Karen Erickson
Objective: The introduction to complementary food is an important stage, particularly for preterm infants and their parents as they navigate a changing feeding relationship. Parental feeding strategies during this period can influence long-term feeding outcomes, but the influence of specific strategies on later feeding skills and feeding problem symptoms is unknown.
Method: Parents of preterm infants completed surveys about their infant's feeding at regular intervals from 1 to 12 months of age. At each time point, parents reported on their use of feeding strategies and their infants' feeding skills (Child Oral and Motor Proficiency Scale) and feeding problem symptoms (Pediatric Eating Assessment Tool). Patterns of parental strategy use across the early complementary feeding period were examined and associations with feeding skills and problems at 12 months corrected age was assessed.
Results: Seventy-four parents completed the surveys. Frequency and type of strategies used changed over time. Four patterns of parental strategy use emerged: low-moderate, schedule dominant, dual dominant, and modification dominant. Parental use of 2 or more types of strategies at relatively high levels was associated with more feeding problem symptoms at 12 months but not feeding skills.
Conclusion: Parents of preterm infants use different strategies during the complementary feeding period to navigate their infant's feeding, with potential implications for later feeding problems. Future research should explore causal mechanism behind parental strategy use and feeding problem symptoms through longitudinal analyses and investigate how parental perceptions and decision-making regarding mealtime strategy use evolve over the first year of life.
{"title":"Parental Feeding Strategies and Outcomes During Complementary Food Introduction Among Preterm Infants at 12 Months Corrected Age.","authors":"Kelsey L Thompson, Jinhee Park, Cara McComish, Suzanne Thoyre, Karen Erickson","doi":"10.1097/DBP.0000000000001433","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/DBP.0000000000001433","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The introduction to complementary food is an important stage, particularly for preterm infants and their parents as they navigate a changing feeding relationship. Parental feeding strategies during this period can influence long-term feeding outcomes, but the influence of specific strategies on later feeding skills and feeding problem symptoms is unknown.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Parents of preterm infants completed surveys about their infant's feeding at regular intervals from 1 to 12 months of age. At each time point, parents reported on their use of feeding strategies and their infants' feeding skills (Child Oral and Motor Proficiency Scale) and feeding problem symptoms (Pediatric Eating Assessment Tool). Patterns of parental strategy use across the early complementary feeding period were examined and associations with feeding skills and problems at 12 months corrected age was assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-four parents completed the surveys. Frequency and type of strategies used changed over time. Four patterns of parental strategy use emerged: low-moderate, schedule dominant, dual dominant, and modification dominant. Parental use of 2 or more types of strategies at relatively high levels was associated with more feeding problem symptoms at 12 months but not feeding skills.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Parents of preterm infants use different strategies during the complementary feeding period to navigate their infant's feeding, with potential implications for later feeding problems. Future research should explore causal mechanism behind parental strategy use and feeding problem symptoms through longitudinal analyses and investigate how parental perceptions and decision-making regarding mealtime strategy use evolve over the first year of life.</p>","PeriodicalId":50215,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145379919","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-17DOI: 10.1097/DBP.0000000000001428
Ilaria Venezia, Sara Passarini, Silvia Guerrera, Massimo Apicella, Viola Alesi, Gemma D'Elia, Ester Sallicandro, Piera Bontempo, Andrea Bartuli, Lorenzo Sinibaldi, Stefano Vicari, Giovanni Valeri
Objective: Maternal 15q11-q13 duplication syndrome (Dup15q) has been associated with 0.5% of all cases of autism spectrum disorder (ASD). There is no established protocol for the neuropsychiatric evaluation of individuals with this syndrome. This study aims to define a protocol incorporating gold standard assessments.
Methods: Six individuals with Dup15q underwent assessment of cognitive and adaptive functioning (Leiter-3, Adaptive Behavior Assessment System-Second Edition), autistic traits (Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule-2 [ADOS-2], Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised [ADI-R], Social Communication Questionnaire, Social Responsiveness Scale, Repetitive Behaviors Scale-R), co-occurring psychopathology (Kiddie Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia, Child Behavior Checklist, Swanson, Nolan, and Pelham-Forth Edition, Sleep Disturbance Scale for Children), and family functioning (Parenting Stress Index-Short Form, PedsQL). Parents were required to fill the Symptom Checklist 90 (SCL-90) and Autism-Spectrum Quotient (AQ) to gather information about their psychiatric co-occurrences and autistic traits. A molecular analysis was performed to confirm the genetic alteration.
Results: Two siblings inherited the duplication through maternal transmission, whereas 4 individuals had a de novo maternal duplication. No participant exhibited preserved cognitive abilities; 4 of 5 showed below average adaptive functioning and 2 of 6 received a diagnosis of ASD. ADOS-2 revealed greater difficulties in the Social Affect domain compared with the Repetitive and Restricted Behaviors domain (p < 0.05), findings confirmed by ADI-R (p < 0.05). K-SADS indicated clinical scores in 5 individuals, with anxiety disorder in 3 participants. High levels of parental stress and a poor quality of life were reported. The mother carrier of the duplication showed clinical scores on the "Positive Symptom Total" of the SCL-90 and on the AQ.
Conclusion: Individuals with an in tandem 15q-11q13 duplication seems to exhibit cognitive and adaptive difficulties along with psychiatric co-occurrences and autistic traits. Parents, with or without the duplication, may experience psychopathological difficulties and impaired family functioning.
{"title":"Phenotypic Description of Autism Spectrum Disorder and Psychopathology in Maternal 15q Duplication Syndrome.","authors":"Ilaria Venezia, Sara Passarini, Silvia Guerrera, Massimo Apicella, Viola Alesi, Gemma D'Elia, Ester Sallicandro, Piera Bontempo, Andrea Bartuli, Lorenzo Sinibaldi, Stefano Vicari, Giovanni Valeri","doi":"10.1097/DBP.0000000000001428","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/DBP.0000000000001428","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Maternal 15q11-q13 duplication syndrome (Dup15q) has been associated with 0.5% of all cases of autism spectrum disorder (ASD). There is no established protocol for the neuropsychiatric evaluation of individuals with this syndrome. This study aims to define a protocol incorporating gold standard assessments.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Six individuals with Dup15q underwent assessment of cognitive and adaptive functioning (Leiter-3, Adaptive Behavior Assessment System-Second Edition), autistic traits (Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule-2 [ADOS-2], Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised [ADI-R], Social Communication Questionnaire, Social Responsiveness Scale, Repetitive Behaviors Scale-R), co-occurring psychopathology (Kiddie Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia, Child Behavior Checklist, Swanson, Nolan, and Pelham-Forth Edition, Sleep Disturbance Scale for Children), and family functioning (Parenting Stress Index-Short Form, PedsQL). Parents were required to fill the Symptom Checklist 90 (SCL-90) and Autism-Spectrum Quotient (AQ) to gather information about their psychiatric co-occurrences and autistic traits. A molecular analysis was performed to confirm the genetic alteration.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two siblings inherited the duplication through maternal transmission, whereas 4 individuals had a de novo maternal duplication. No participant exhibited preserved cognitive abilities; 4 of 5 showed below average adaptive functioning and 2 of 6 received a diagnosis of ASD. ADOS-2 revealed greater difficulties in the Social Affect domain compared with the Repetitive and Restricted Behaviors domain (p < 0.05), findings confirmed by ADI-R (p < 0.05). K-SADS indicated clinical scores in 5 individuals, with anxiety disorder in 3 participants. High levels of parental stress and a poor quality of life were reported. The mother carrier of the duplication showed clinical scores on the \"Positive Symptom Total\" of the SCL-90 and on the AQ.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Individuals with an in tandem 15q-11q13 duplication seems to exhibit cognitive and adaptive difficulties along with psychiatric co-occurrences and autistic traits. Parents, with or without the duplication, may experience psychopathological difficulties and impaired family functioning.</p>","PeriodicalId":50215,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145330658","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-01Epub Date: 2025-07-22DOI: 10.1097/DBP.0000000000001392
Valerie M Volkert, Rashelle Berry, Heather Farling, Caitlin Waddle, Emily Malugen, Sandhya Rajagopal, Laura M Johnson, Scott Gillespie, Derianne Buckley, Meara McMahon, Lawrence Scahill, William G Sharp
Objective: The primary objective of this pilot trial was to determine to what extent hunger provocation, via rapid weaning from enteral feedings, was acceptable and feasible and to evaluate the effect of this intervention when used during intensive multidisciplinary feeding intervention for children dependent on enteral feedings.
Method: The study was conducted at an Intensive Multidisciplinary Program located in the Southeastern United States from May 2021 to October 2023. Children were randomly assigned 1:1 to standard wean or rapid wean using permuted blocks of 2 and 4 with allocation pattern concealed to investigators resulting in respective cohort sizes of 8 (N = 16 participants, total) for 8 weeks. Feasibility benchmarks and data completeness were summarized using percentages and means. The study also evaluated the effect of intervention on treatment outcomes including weight-for-age z-score, percentage of daily caloric needs met by mouth, percent of patients achieving ≥1 day where 100% of caloric needs were met via oral feeding, and time to effect.
Results: Feasibility and acceptability benchmarks were achieved. Preliminary outcome data suggest rapid tube weaning did not influence reaching 100% oral intake or fully weaning from a feeding tube when used as an adjunct to behavioral intervention.
Conclusion: This study was a prerequisite to support a future efficacy randomized clinical trial to further study how to optimize outcomes to achieve full weaning from tube feeding.
{"title":"Acceptability and Feasibility of Rapid Tube Weaning During Intensive Multidisciplinary Feeding Intervention.","authors":"Valerie M Volkert, Rashelle Berry, Heather Farling, Caitlin Waddle, Emily Malugen, Sandhya Rajagopal, Laura M Johnson, Scott Gillespie, Derianne Buckley, Meara McMahon, Lawrence Scahill, William G Sharp","doi":"10.1097/DBP.0000000000001392","DOIUrl":"10.1097/DBP.0000000000001392","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The primary objective of this pilot trial was to determine to what extent hunger provocation, via rapid weaning from enteral feedings, was acceptable and feasible and to evaluate the effect of this intervention when used during intensive multidisciplinary feeding intervention for children dependent on enteral feedings.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The study was conducted at an Intensive Multidisciplinary Program located in the Southeastern United States from May 2021 to October 2023. Children were randomly assigned 1:1 to standard wean or rapid wean using permuted blocks of 2 and 4 with allocation pattern concealed to investigators resulting in respective cohort sizes of 8 (N = 16 participants, total) for 8 weeks. Feasibility benchmarks and data completeness were summarized using percentages and means. The study also evaluated the effect of intervention on treatment outcomes including weight-for-age z-score, percentage of daily caloric needs met by mouth, percent of patients achieving ≥1 day where 100% of caloric needs were met via oral feeding, and time to effect.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Feasibility and acceptability benchmarks were achieved. Preliminary outcome data suggest rapid tube weaning did not influence reaching 100% oral intake or fully weaning from a feeding tube when used as an adjunct to behavioral intervention.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study was a prerequisite to support a future efficacy randomized clinical trial to further study how to optimize outcomes to achieve full weaning from tube feeding.</p>","PeriodicalId":50215,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics","volume":" ","pages":"e536-e540"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144700243","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-01Epub Date: 2025-06-17DOI: 10.1097/DBP.0000000000001386
Tammy Lim, Alison Cheng, Elana Bern, Marion Aw, Marilyn Augustyn
Case: Andrew is a 12-year-old boy living in Southeast Asia with autism spectrum disorder (minimally verbal), who first presented with new symptoms of low mood and anhedonia during the COVID pandemic. This was associated with loss of appetite, which culminated in him eventually refusing to eat any food or swallow any liquids (including saliva). He would hold his saliva in his mouth in the daytime and refused to swallow. He would spit out the saliva when instructed to do so. Because of his worries about swallowing his saliva involuntarily during sleep, he also experienced insomnia. If he managed to fall asleep, he would involuntarily swallow his saliva.Three months from his initial symptoms, he was relocated by his family, to another southeast Asian country for specialty care. At this time, he also refused to speak. He went from intermittently accepting some foods, to being completely averse to any food or fluid intake. He was diagnosed with avoidant restrictive food intake disorder. Because of his acute refusal to eat or drink, a nasogastric tube was inserted and subsequently a gastrostomy tube for enteral nutrition. With this intervention, he was able to maintain good weight and nutrition.Simultaneously, he began treatment in a multidisciplinary feeding and nutrition program. Genetic testing done for concerns of neurological regression yielded a variant of unknown significance. He also began an anti-depressant and sleep medication.During this period, he returned to his country of origin and was no longer able to receive direct in-person specialty feeding support, but did have a dedicated caregiver. He was seen once every few months either in-person or by telehealth by the multidisciplinary feeding and nutrition clinic in the second country. His caregiver was taught to implement behavior strategies with a goal of him resuming oral food intake eventually.What factors should be considered when evaluating a child with co-existing neurodevelopmental and psychiatric conditions, who completely stops eating or drinking in the midst of a global pandemic? What feeding approach would be helpful in managing a complex case like this? What feeding interventions can be actualized at home to reintroduce solids? How did the pandemic impact access to services?
{"title":"Challenging Case January 2025: An Autistic Youth With ARFID During the COVID Pandemic.","authors":"Tammy Lim, Alison Cheng, Elana Bern, Marion Aw, Marilyn Augustyn","doi":"10.1097/DBP.0000000000001386","DOIUrl":"10.1097/DBP.0000000000001386","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Case: </strong>Andrew is a 12-year-old boy living in Southeast Asia with autism spectrum disorder (minimally verbal), who first presented with new symptoms of low mood and anhedonia during the COVID pandemic. This was associated with loss of appetite, which culminated in him eventually refusing to eat any food or swallow any liquids (including saliva). He would hold his saliva in his mouth in the daytime and refused to swallow. He would spit out the saliva when instructed to do so. Because of his worries about swallowing his saliva involuntarily during sleep, he also experienced insomnia. If he managed to fall asleep, he would involuntarily swallow his saliva.Three months from his initial symptoms, he was relocated by his family, to another southeast Asian country for specialty care. At this time, he also refused to speak. He went from intermittently accepting some foods, to being completely averse to any food or fluid intake. He was diagnosed with avoidant restrictive food intake disorder. Because of his acute refusal to eat or drink, a nasogastric tube was inserted and subsequently a gastrostomy tube for enteral nutrition. With this intervention, he was able to maintain good weight and nutrition.Simultaneously, he began treatment in a multidisciplinary feeding and nutrition program. Genetic testing done for concerns of neurological regression yielded a variant of unknown significance. He also began an anti-depressant and sleep medication.During this period, he returned to his country of origin and was no longer able to receive direct in-person specialty feeding support, but did have a dedicated caregiver. He was seen once every few months either in-person or by telehealth by the multidisciplinary feeding and nutrition clinic in the second country. His caregiver was taught to implement behavior strategies with a goal of him resuming oral food intake eventually.What factors should be considered when evaluating a child with co-existing neurodevelopmental and psychiatric conditions, who completely stops eating or drinking in the midst of a global pandemic? What feeding approach would be helpful in managing a complex case like this? What feeding interventions can be actualized at home to reintroduce solids? How did the pandemic impact access to services?</p>","PeriodicalId":50215,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics","volume":" ","pages":"e541-e543"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144318549","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-01Epub Date: 2025-07-22DOI: 10.1097/DBP.0000000000001397
Alyssa Barré, De-An Zhang, Victoria Holm, Daphne Lew, Alexander Van Speybroeck, Henry Iwinski, Selina C Poon
Objective: Suicide is the second leading cause of death for adolescents. Children in surgical clinics have diagnoses that may predispose mental health challenges. This study explored associations between demographics, diagnoses, and suicide risk screenings in the outpatient pediatric surgical setting.
Methods: A database of suicide risk screenings administered across a pediatric surgical health care system from 2019 to 2023 was analyzed. Demographic variables and diagnoses were collected, and multilevel logistic regression models calculated odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for the relationships.
Results: In total, 79,384 suicide risk screenings were collected for 50,796 patients. 5.6% (n = 4476) were positive for suicidal thoughts. Asians were less likely to screen positive (OR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.56-0.76), and females were more likely (OR, 1.92; CI, 1.80-2.05). Patients with Medicaid or uninsured were more likely to screen positive (OR, 1.47; CI, 1.38-1.57 and OR, 1.17, CI, 1.002-1.36, respectively). As affluence increased, there was decreased likelihood of positive screens (OR, 0.93; CI, 0.91-0.96). The diagnosis most associated with increased risk was mental, behavioral, and neurodevelopmental disorders (OR, 3.41; CI, 2.92-3.97), followed by pain (OR, 1.88; CI, 1.71-2.05), burns (OR, 1.43; CI, 1.21-1.69), and scoliosis (OR, 1.10; CI, 1.02-1.17).
Conclusion: When screening for suicide risk in outpatient pediatric surgical subspecialty clinics, females and patients with Medicaid or uninsured have increased risk of screening positive for suicidal ideations. Youth with mental, behavioral, and neurodevelopmental disorders were most at risk, followed by pain, burns, and scoliosis. It is important to understand how these factors influence mental health to aid in providing resources for at-risk patients.
{"title":"Demographic and Clinical Predictors of Suicide Risk in Pediatric Surgical Clinics: A Retrospective Study of 79,000 Screenings.","authors":"Alyssa Barré, De-An Zhang, Victoria Holm, Daphne Lew, Alexander Van Speybroeck, Henry Iwinski, Selina C Poon","doi":"10.1097/DBP.0000000000001397","DOIUrl":"10.1097/DBP.0000000000001397","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Suicide is the second leading cause of death for adolescents. Children in surgical clinics have diagnoses that may predispose mental health challenges. This study explored associations between demographics, diagnoses, and suicide risk screenings in the outpatient pediatric surgical setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A database of suicide risk screenings administered across a pediatric surgical health care system from 2019 to 2023 was analyzed. Demographic variables and diagnoses were collected, and multilevel logistic regression models calculated odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for the relationships.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 79,384 suicide risk screenings were collected for 50,796 patients. 5.6% (n = 4476) were positive for suicidal thoughts. Asians were less likely to screen positive (OR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.56-0.76), and females were more likely (OR, 1.92; CI, 1.80-2.05). Patients with Medicaid or uninsured were more likely to screen positive (OR, 1.47; CI, 1.38-1.57 and OR, 1.17, CI, 1.002-1.36, respectively). As affluence increased, there was decreased likelihood of positive screens (OR, 0.93; CI, 0.91-0.96). The diagnosis most associated with increased risk was mental, behavioral, and neurodevelopmental disorders (OR, 3.41; CI, 2.92-3.97), followed by pain (OR, 1.88; CI, 1.71-2.05), burns (OR, 1.43; CI, 1.21-1.69), and scoliosis (OR, 1.10; CI, 1.02-1.17).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>When screening for suicide risk in outpatient pediatric surgical subspecialty clinics, females and patients with Medicaid or uninsured have increased risk of screening positive for suicidal ideations. Youth with mental, behavioral, and neurodevelopmental disorders were most at risk, followed by pain, burns, and scoliosis. It is important to understand how these factors influence mental health to aid in providing resources for at-risk patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":50215,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics","volume":" ","pages":"e433-e438"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144700244","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-01Epub Date: 2025-10-06DOI: 10.1097/DBP.0000000000001382
Beril Aydın, Mustafa Agah Tekindal, Elif Nursel Özmert
Objective: The aim of this study was to determine the effect of fathers' participation in complementary feeding on the occurrence of parent-reported behavioral feeding problems in infants.
Method: Both parents in the intervention group and mothers in the control group were trained for 20 minutes in accordance with the national complementary feeding guideline. Behavioral feeding status were evaluated by Behavioral Pediatrics Feeding Assessment Scale.
Results: The frequency of fathers engaged in infant feeding increased in the intervention group compared with in the control group at the follow-ups ( p < 0.05), respectively. The frequency of behavioral feeding problems at 9th and 12th months in the intervention group was 44.7% and 18.8%, respectively, compared with 79.5% and 65% in the control group ( p < 0.05). Problems related to the attitudes of fathers during feeding in the intervention group were lower than the control group. The Behavioral Pediatrics Feeding Assessment Scale scores in the intervention group were 54.36 ± 6.82 and 53.31 ± 6.62 for fathers, while they were 62.54 ± 6.69 and 61.28 ± 7.73 for fathers in the control group, at the 9th and 12th months, respectively ( p < 0.01).
Conclusion: Training and engaging fathers on complementary feeding positively affects the feeding attitudes and behaviors of parents and reduces early behavioral feeding problems in infants.
{"title":"The Father's Role in Complementary Feeding During Infancy in Turkey.","authors":"Beril Aydın, Mustafa Agah Tekindal, Elif Nursel Özmert","doi":"10.1097/DBP.0000000000001382","DOIUrl":"10.1097/DBP.0000000000001382","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to determine the effect of fathers' participation in complementary feeding on the occurrence of parent-reported behavioral feeding problems in infants.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Both parents in the intervention group and mothers in the control group were trained for 20 minutes in accordance with the national complementary feeding guideline. Behavioral feeding status were evaluated by Behavioral Pediatrics Feeding Assessment Scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The frequency of fathers engaged in infant feeding increased in the intervention group compared with in the control group at the follow-ups ( p < 0.05), respectively. The frequency of behavioral feeding problems at 9th and 12th months in the intervention group was 44.7% and 18.8%, respectively, compared with 79.5% and 65% in the control group ( p < 0.05). Problems related to the attitudes of fathers during feeding in the intervention group were lower than the control group. The Behavioral Pediatrics Feeding Assessment Scale scores in the intervention group were 54.36 ± 6.82 and 53.31 ± 6.62 for fathers, while they were 62.54 ± 6.69 and 61.28 ± 7.73 for fathers in the control group, at the 9th and 12th months, respectively ( p < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Training and engaging fathers on complementary feeding positively affects the feeding attitudes and behaviors of parents and reduces early behavioral feeding problems in infants.</p>","PeriodicalId":50215,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics","volume":" ","pages":"e528-e535"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145234047","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-01Epub Date: 2025-07-08DOI: 10.1097/DBP.0000000000001395
Suk-Joon Hong, My H Vu, Douglas Vanderbilt, Larry Yin, Karen Kay Imagawa, Alexis Deavenport-Saman
Objective: Children with higher adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) experience more severe parent-reported attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Positive childhood experiences (PCEs) help to build resilience and mitigate the impact of ACEs on ADHD. Prior studies have measured the 2 constructs as independent factors, but no research has examined their combined influence on children with ADHD. The first aim was to categorize children with different levels of parent-reported ADHD severity into classes based on shared characteristics of ACE and PCE promoters. The second aim was to examine the relationship between the classes and ADHD severity.
Methods: Participants included children 6 to 17 years with data on the 2019 National Survey of Children's Health ADHD severity questionnaire (n = 19,715; weighted n = 49,149,269). Latent class analysis (LCA) identified subgroups of children experiencing patterns among PCE promoters and ACEs, which were measured as independent variables in an adjusted ordinal regression model to estimate their composite effects on ADHD severity.
Results: Using LCA, one class belonging to children with low ACEs and high PCE promoters (class 1) and another belonging to children with high ACEs and low PCE promoters (class 2) were identified. Class 2 was 2.2 times more likely to have more severe ADHD (aOR 2.2; 95% confidence interval, 1.8-2.6).
Conclusion: Findings suggest ACEs and PCE promoters do not operate independently; children with high ACEs had low PCE promoters and had more severe parent-reported ADHD. Clinicians should consider actively screening for the presence of ACEs and PCEs in all children, especially those with high ADHD severity, and build strong alliances with families.
{"title":"The Coexistence of Adverse Childhood Experiences, Positive Childhood Experiences, and Parent-reported Attention-deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Severity: National Survey of Children's Health.","authors":"Suk-Joon Hong, My H Vu, Douglas Vanderbilt, Larry Yin, Karen Kay Imagawa, Alexis Deavenport-Saman","doi":"10.1097/DBP.0000000000001395","DOIUrl":"10.1097/DBP.0000000000001395","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Children with higher adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) experience more severe parent-reported attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Positive childhood experiences (PCEs) help to build resilience and mitigate the impact of ACEs on ADHD. Prior studies have measured the 2 constructs as independent factors, but no research has examined their combined influence on children with ADHD. The first aim was to categorize children with different levels of parent-reported ADHD severity into classes based on shared characteristics of ACE and PCE promoters. The second aim was to examine the relationship between the classes and ADHD severity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants included children 6 to 17 years with data on the 2019 National Survey of Children's Health ADHD severity questionnaire (n = 19,715; weighted n = 49,149,269). Latent class analysis (LCA) identified subgroups of children experiencing patterns among PCE promoters and ACEs, which were measured as independent variables in an adjusted ordinal regression model to estimate their composite effects on ADHD severity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Using LCA, one class belonging to children with low ACEs and high PCE promoters (class 1) and another belonging to children with high ACEs and low PCE promoters (class 2) were identified. Class 2 was 2.2 times more likely to have more severe ADHD (aOR 2.2; 95% confidence interval, 1.8-2.6).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Findings suggest ACEs and PCE promoters do not operate independently; children with high ACEs had low PCE promoters and had more severe parent-reported ADHD. Clinicians should consider actively screening for the presence of ACEs and PCEs in all children, especially those with high ADHD severity, and build strong alliances with families.</p>","PeriodicalId":50215,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics","volume":" ","pages":"e468-e474"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12404043/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144602069","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-01Epub Date: 2025-09-05DOI: 10.1097/DBP.0000000000001403
Marija Pranjić, Virginia Peisch, Nikolina Vukšić, Sambridhi Subedi, Anne B Arnett
Objective: Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is one of the most common childhood psychiatric disorders and a common presenting concern in primary and developmental pediatric care. However, objective diagnostic tools are currently not available, leading to delayed and missed diagnoses. The current systematic review aimed to determine whether objective indices can serve as diagnostic markers for pediatric ADHD.
Method: We conducted a systematic review of objective behavioral, neurobiological, and genetic biomarkers that could inform a precision medicine approach to diagnosis of pediatric ADHD. Following the PRISMA guidelines, we searched three major databases (MEDLINE, PsycInfo, and Scopus) for articles published between 2012 and 2024 that evaluated diagnostic biomarkers with a translational aim.
Results: A total of 111 studies met inclusion criteria, including 42 behavioral, 44 neuroimaging, and 25 genetic studies. Among behavioral studies, measures of physical activity achieved discriminant validity in the good to excellent range. Neuroimaging biomarkers were strongest when machine learning and multiple-features models were used. A particularly promising direction involved task-based NIRS paradigms targeting cognitive control. The results of the genetic studies underscored the complexity of the genetic architecture of ADHD, implicating rare and common variants, as well as epigenetic mechanisms. MicroRNA and methylation profiles demonstrated the strongest accuracy, overall.
Conclusion: Our systematic review identified promising candidate diagnostic markers for ADHD across behavioral, neuroimaging, and genetic methods. Multimethod approaches are likely to yield the strongest diagnostic accuracy. The complexity and cost of these approaches limits potential for implementation of a precision medicine approach to pediatric ADHD diagnosis in primary care settings.
{"title":"Precision Medicine in Pediatric Attention-deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: A Systematic Review of Behavioral, Neurobiological and Genetic Diagnostic Biomarkers.","authors":"Marija Pranjić, Virginia Peisch, Nikolina Vukšić, Sambridhi Subedi, Anne B Arnett","doi":"10.1097/DBP.0000000000001403","DOIUrl":"10.1097/DBP.0000000000001403","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is one of the most common childhood psychiatric disorders and a common presenting concern in primary and developmental pediatric care. However, objective diagnostic tools are currently not available, leading to delayed and missed diagnoses. The current systematic review aimed to determine whether objective indices can serve as diagnostic markers for pediatric ADHD.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We conducted a systematic review of objective behavioral, neurobiological, and genetic biomarkers that could inform a precision medicine approach to diagnosis of pediatric ADHD. Following the PRISMA guidelines, we searched three major databases (MEDLINE, PsycInfo, and Scopus) for articles published between 2012 and 2024 that evaluated diagnostic biomarkers with a translational aim.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 111 studies met inclusion criteria, including 42 behavioral, 44 neuroimaging, and 25 genetic studies. Among behavioral studies, measures of physical activity achieved discriminant validity in the good to excellent range. Neuroimaging biomarkers were strongest when machine learning and multiple-features models were used. A particularly promising direction involved task-based NIRS paradigms targeting cognitive control. The results of the genetic studies underscored the complexity of the genetic architecture of ADHD, implicating rare and common variants, as well as epigenetic mechanisms. MicroRNA and methylation profiles demonstrated the strongest accuracy, overall.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our systematic review identified promising candidate diagnostic markers for ADHD across behavioral, neuroimaging, and genetic methods. Multimethod approaches are likely to yield the strongest diagnostic accuracy. The complexity and cost of these approaches limits potential for implementation of a precision medicine approach to pediatric ADHD diagnosis in primary care settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":50215,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics","volume":" ","pages":"e481-e498"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145001845","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-01Epub Date: 2025-09-03DOI: 10.1097/DBP.0000000000001417
Julie Bickel, Jonathan Hatoun, Margaret Fry, Lisa Prock, Louis Vernacchio, Laura Burckett Patane, Ashley Coop, Carol Weitzman
Objective: The current study assesses the impact of an educational program designed to train primary care clinicians (PCCs) to diagnose children between age 18 and 36 months at high risk for autism spectrum disorder (ASD).
Methods: Two cohorts of PCCs completed an 8-session training over a 9-month period. Clinicians were surveyed at baseline and 3 months after training completion. Information was collected regarding PCCs knowledge of ASD, their diagnostic beliefs, and perceived comfort and competence regarding all aspects of an ASD diagnostic evaluation.
Results: A total of 35 participants completed training, and 29 (82%) completed presurvey and postsurvey. At baseline, 89% of PCCs reported no additional training in developmental behavioral pediatrics or diagnosing children with ASD, although 31% had diagnosed a child with ASD in the past year. After training, PCCs reported significantly greater comfort diagnosing ASD in children between age 18 and 36 months with mild ASD (2.31 vs 3.02, p < 0.0001), moderate ASD (3.03 vs 3.83, p < 0.001), and severe ASD (3.45 vs 4.34, p < 0.0001). PCCs also reported a significant increase in their knowledge and perceived competence in completing an autism evaluation, including taking an autism history, completing a structured observation, scoring the Childhood Autism Rating Scale-Second Edition, writing a letter of medical necessity, and discussing findings with families.
Conclusion: After training, PCCs reported a significant improvement in their knowledge, comfort, and competence regarding all aspects of diagnosing young children 18 to 36 months of age at high risk of ASD. PCCs can help to improve access to services for young children at risk for ASD.
目的:目前的研究评估了一项旨在培训初级保健临床医生(PCCs)诊断18至36个月自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)高风险儿童的教育计划的影响。方法:两组PCCs完成了为期9个月的8期培训。临床医生在基线和培训完成后3个月接受调查。收集了PCCs关于ASD的知识、诊断信念以及对ASD诊断评估各方面的感知舒适度和能力的信息。结果:35名参与者完成了培训,29名(82%)完成了问卷调查和事后调查。在基线时,尽管31%的儿童在过去一年中被诊断出患有自闭症,但89%的儿科医生报告没有接受过发育行为儿科或自闭症儿童诊断方面的额外培训。训练后,PCCs报告在18至36个月的轻度ASD (2.31 vs 3.02, p < 0.0001)、中度ASD (3.03 vs 3.83, p < 0.001)和重度ASD (3.45 vs 4.34, p < 0.0001)患儿中诊断ASD的舒适度显著提高。这些儿童在完成自闭症评估方面的知识和感知能力也显著提高,包括填写自闭症病史、完成结构化观察、给儿童自闭症评定量表(第二版)打分、撰写医疗必要性信函以及与家人讨论结果。结论:经过培训,PCCs报告了他们在诊断18 - 36月龄幼儿ASD高风险的各个方面的知识、舒适度和能力的显著提高。PCCs可以帮助改善有自闭症风险的幼儿获得服务的机会。
{"title":"Bridging the Gap in Autism Diagnosis: An Evaluation of a Novel Primary Care Training Model.","authors":"Julie Bickel, Jonathan Hatoun, Margaret Fry, Lisa Prock, Louis Vernacchio, Laura Burckett Patane, Ashley Coop, Carol Weitzman","doi":"10.1097/DBP.0000000000001417","DOIUrl":"10.1097/DBP.0000000000001417","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The current study assesses the impact of an educational program designed to train primary care clinicians (PCCs) to diagnose children between age 18 and 36 months at high risk for autism spectrum disorder (ASD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two cohorts of PCCs completed an 8-session training over a 9-month period. Clinicians were surveyed at baseline and 3 months after training completion. Information was collected regarding PCCs knowledge of ASD, their diagnostic beliefs, and perceived comfort and competence regarding all aspects of an ASD diagnostic evaluation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 35 participants completed training, and 29 (82%) completed presurvey and postsurvey. At baseline, 89% of PCCs reported no additional training in developmental behavioral pediatrics or diagnosing children with ASD, although 31% had diagnosed a child with ASD in the past year. After training, PCCs reported significantly greater comfort diagnosing ASD in children between age 18 and 36 months with mild ASD (2.31 vs 3.02, p < 0.0001), moderate ASD (3.03 vs 3.83, p < 0.001), and severe ASD (3.45 vs 4.34, p < 0.0001). PCCs also reported a significant increase in their knowledge and perceived competence in completing an autism evaluation, including taking an autism history, completing a structured observation, scoring the Childhood Autism Rating Scale-Second Edition, writing a letter of medical necessity, and discussing findings with families.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>After training, PCCs reported a significant improvement in their knowledge, comfort, and competence regarding all aspects of diagnosing young children 18 to 36 months of age at high risk of ASD. PCCs can help to improve access to services for young children at risk for ASD.</p>","PeriodicalId":50215,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics","volume":" ","pages":"e444-e449"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144976971","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}