首页 > 最新文献

American Journal of Managed Care最新文献

英文 中文
The price of progress: understanding innovation and affordability of prescription drugs. 进步的代价:了解处方药的创新和可负担性。
IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI: 10.37765/ajmc.2024.89615
Anthony T Lo Sasso, M Christopher Roebuck

Economic incentives and patent protections drive development of innovative medications. Drug prices are determined by consumer demand, not production costs. Therefore, governmental regulation risks future investment in research and development.

经济激励和专利保护推动着创新药物的开发。药品价格由消费者需求而非生产成本决定。因此,政府监管会给未来的研发投资带来风险。
{"title":"The price of progress: understanding innovation and affordability of prescription drugs.","authors":"Anthony T Lo Sasso, M Christopher Roebuck","doi":"10.37765/ajmc.2024.89615","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.37765/ajmc.2024.89615","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Economic incentives and patent protections drive development of innovative medications. Drug prices are determined by consumer demand, not production costs. Therefore, governmental regulation risks future investment in research and development.</p>","PeriodicalId":50808,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Managed Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142523601","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Teamwork enhances patient experience: linking TEAM and Net Promoter Scores. 团队合作提升患者体验:将 TEAM 和净促进者得分联系起来。
IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI: 10.37765/ajmc.2024.89616
Amy Nguyen Howell, Jacqueline Ruffing, Omid Ameli, Christine E Chaisson, Dawn Webster, Sara Poplau, Erin Sullivan, Martin Stillman, Mark Linzer

Objectives: We previously described a 6-item teamwork index (TEAM) with a strong relationship to provider experience, lower burnout, and intent to stay. We now sought to determine whether (1) TEAM relates to higher patient Net Promoter Score (NPS, or likelihood of patient referring to the organization) and (2) teamwork mediates a provider experience-NPS relationship.

Study design: A provider wellness survey was administered in the fall of 2019 in 6 care delivery organizations (CDOs) with patient NPS data.

Methods: Measures included a validated burnout item, 6-item TEAM measure, provider experience metric, standard intent-to-stay question, and NPS data from 79,254 patients matched to CDO. Regression analyses modeled relationships among TEAM, provider experience, and NPS. Open-ended comments were reviewed to confirm patient NPS findings.

Results: There were 1386 provider respondents (53% physicians, 47% advanced practice clinicians, 58% female, 62% White, 58% in primary care; response rate, 55.7%). Median NPS was 83%. TEAM was associated with patient NPS greater than the median (53% with high TEAM and high NPS vs 44% with low TEAM and high NPS; P < .001), as was provider experience (52% vs 45%; P < .05). In regression analyses, patient NPS was strongly related to TEAM (adjusted OR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.25-1.60; P < .001). The provider experience-patient NPS relationship was partly mediated by TEAM. Open-ended comments confirmed positive or negative sentiments related to NPS.

Conclusions: Teamwork and provider experience relate to patient NPS, and the provider experience-NPS relationship appears to be mediated by teamwork.

目标:我们以前曾描述过一种 6 项团队合作指数(TEAM),它与医疗服务提供者的体验、较低的职业倦怠和留任意愿有密切关系。现在,我们试图确定:(1)TEAM 是否与较高的患者净促进者得分(NPS,即患者向医疗机构推荐的可能性)有关;(2)团队合作是否在医疗服务提供者体验与 NPS 关系之间起到中介作用:研究设计:2019 年秋季,在 6 家提供患者 NPS 数据的医疗机构(CDO)中开展了医疗服务提供者健康调查:研究措施包括一个经过验证的职业倦怠项目、6 个项目的 TEAM 测量、医疗服务提供者体验指标、标准逗留意向问题,以及与 CDO 匹配的 79,254 名患者的 NPS 数据。回归分析模拟了 TEAM、医疗服务提供者经验和 NPS 之间的关系。对开放式评论进行了审查,以确认患者 NPS 的调查结果:共有 1386 名医疗服务提供者(53% 为内科医生,47% 为高级临床医生,58% 为女性,62% 为白人,58% 为初级保健医生;回复率为 55.7%)做出了回复。NPS 中位数为 83%。团队合作与患者 NPS 高于中位数有关(高团队合作和高 NPS 的比例为 53% vs 低团队合作和高 NPS 的比例为 44%;P 结论:团队合作和医疗服务提供者经验与患者 NPS 有关,医疗服务提供者经验与 NPS 的关系似乎受团队合作的影响。
{"title":"Teamwork enhances patient experience: linking TEAM and Net Promoter Scores.","authors":"Amy Nguyen Howell, Jacqueline Ruffing, Omid Ameli, Christine E Chaisson, Dawn Webster, Sara Poplau, Erin Sullivan, Martin Stillman, Mark Linzer","doi":"10.37765/ajmc.2024.89616","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.37765/ajmc.2024.89616","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We previously described a 6-item teamwork index (TEAM) with a strong relationship to provider experience, lower burnout, and intent to stay. We now sought to determine whether (1) TEAM relates to higher patient Net Promoter Score (NPS, or likelihood of patient referring to the organization) and (2) teamwork mediates a provider experience-NPS relationship.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>A provider wellness survey was administered in the fall of 2019 in 6 care delivery organizations (CDOs) with patient NPS data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Measures included a validated burnout item, 6-item TEAM measure, provider experience metric, standard intent-to-stay question, and NPS data from 79,254 patients matched to CDO. Regression analyses modeled relationships among TEAM, provider experience, and NPS. Open-ended comments were reviewed to confirm patient NPS findings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 1386 provider respondents (53% physicians, 47% advanced practice clinicians, 58% female, 62% White, 58% in primary care; response rate, 55.7%). Median NPS was 83%. TEAM was associated with patient NPS greater than the median (53% with high TEAM and high NPS vs 44% with low TEAM and high NPS; P < .001), as was provider experience (52% vs 45%; P < .05). In regression analyses, patient NPS was strongly related to TEAM (adjusted OR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.25-1.60; P < .001). The provider experience-patient NPS relationship was partly mediated by TEAM. Open-ended comments confirmed positive or negative sentiments related to NPS.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Teamwork and provider experience relate to patient NPS, and the provider experience-NPS relationship appears to be mediated by teamwork.</p>","PeriodicalId":50808,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Managed Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142523600","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Care transition management and patient outcomes in hospitalized Medicare beneficiaries. 住院医疗保险受益人的护理过渡管理和患者疗效。
IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI: 10.37765/ajmc.2024.89605
Mariétou H Ouayogodé, Brianna Hardy, John Mullahy, Maureen A Smith, Ellen Meara

Objectives: To assess whether discharging hospitals' self-reported care transition activities (CTAs) were associated with transitional care management (TCM) claims following discharge to the community and whether CTAs and TCM were associated with better patient outcomes.

Study design: Cross-sectional study of 424,115 hospitalized Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries 66 years and older who were discharged to the community in 2017 and attributed to 659 hospitals in the 2017-2018 National Survey of Healthcare Organizations and Systems (response rate, 46.5%). Of these beneficiaries, 76,156 were categorized into a Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program (HRRP) cohort based on admission principal diagnoses.

Methods: Using logistic regression, we examined the association between survey-based hospital-reported CTAs and an attributed beneficiary's TCM claim. We assessed the associations between hospital CTAs and TCM and beneficiary spending, utilization, and mortality in linear (continuous outcomes) and logistic (binary outcomes) regressions.

Results: Beneficiaries attributed to hospitals reporting high (top tertile vs bottom tertile) CTA had a higher probability of TCM after discharge by 3 percentage points. TCM was associated with lower 90-day episode spending (-$2803; P < .001) and improved quality (-28.7 30-day readmissions/1000 beneficiaries; P < .001; -29.7 deaths/1000 beneficiaries; P < .001), and greater use of evaluation and management visits (491/1000 beneficiaries; P = .001). Billing for TCM was associated with significantly lower spending, emergency department visits, hospitalizations, readmissions, and 90-day mortality in the HRRP cohort. Significant utilization reductions were estimated for beneficiaries attributed to high-CTA hospitals.

Conclusions: Beyond recent increases in provider TCM compensation and relaxed billing restrictions, hospitals should be encouraged to increase CTA and to enhance care transitions to improve patient outcomes and lower spending.

目的评估出院医院自我报告的护理过渡活动(CTA)是否与出院到社区后的过渡护理管理(TCM)索赔有关,以及CTA和TCM是否与更好的患者预后有关:横断面研究:研究对象为424115名66岁及以上的住院医疗保险付费服务受益人,他们于2017年出院返回社区,并归属于2017-2018年全国医疗保健组织和系统调查中的659家医院(响应率为46.5%)。在这些受益人中,76156 人根据入院主要诊断被归入减少再入院计划(HRRP)队列:通过逻辑回归,我们研究了基于调查的医院报告的 CTA 与归属受益人的中医理赔之间的关联。我们通过线性(连续结果)和逻辑(二元结果)回归评估了医院 CTA 和中医药与受益人支出、使用情况和死亡率之间的关联:报告 CTA 高(最高三分位数与最低三分位数)医院的受益人出院后接受中医治疗的概率高出 3 个百分点。中医治疗与较低的 90 天住院费用相关(-2803 美元;P除了最近提高医疗服务提供者的中医治疗补偿和放宽计费限制外,还应鼓励医院增加 CTA 和加强护理过渡,以改善患者预后和降低支出。
{"title":"Care transition management and patient outcomes in hospitalized Medicare beneficiaries.","authors":"Mariétou H Ouayogodé, Brianna Hardy, John Mullahy, Maureen A Smith, Ellen Meara","doi":"10.37765/ajmc.2024.89605","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.37765/ajmc.2024.89605","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess whether discharging hospitals' self-reported care transition activities (CTAs) were associated with transitional care management (TCM) claims following discharge to the community and whether CTAs and TCM were associated with better patient outcomes.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Cross-sectional study of 424,115 hospitalized Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries 66 years and older who were discharged to the community in 2017 and attributed to 659 hospitals in the 2017-2018 National Survey of Healthcare Organizations and Systems (response rate, 46.5%). Of these beneficiaries, 76,156 were categorized into a Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program (HRRP) cohort based on admission principal diagnoses.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using logistic regression, we examined the association between survey-based hospital-reported CTAs and an attributed beneficiary's TCM claim. We assessed the associations between hospital CTAs and TCM and beneficiary spending, utilization, and mortality in linear (continuous outcomes) and logistic (binary outcomes) regressions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Beneficiaries attributed to hospitals reporting high (top tertile vs bottom tertile) CTA had a higher probability of TCM after discharge by 3 percentage points. TCM was associated with lower 90-day episode spending (-$2803; P < .001) and improved quality (-28.7 30-day readmissions/1000 beneficiaries; P < .001; -29.7 deaths/1000 beneficiaries; P < .001), and greater use of evaluation and management visits (491/1000 beneficiaries; P = .001). Billing for TCM was associated with significantly lower spending, emergency department visits, hospitalizations, readmissions, and 90-day mortality in the HRRP cohort. Significant utilization reductions were estimated for beneficiaries attributed to high-CTA hospitals.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Beyond recent increases in provider TCM compensation and relaxed billing restrictions, hospitals should be encouraged to increase CTA and to enhance care transitions to improve patient outcomes and lower spending.</p>","PeriodicalId":50808,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Managed Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142300103","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Beyond average spending: distributional and seasonal commercial insurance trends, 2012-2021. 超越平均支出:2012-2021 年商业保险的分布和季节性趋势。
IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI: 10.37765/ajmc.2024.89600
Erin L Duffy, Sarah Green, Samantha Randall, Erin Trish

Objectives: The annual mean spending measures typically used to study longitudinal trends mask distributional and seasonal variation that is relevant to patients' perceptions of health care affordability and, in turn, provider collections. This study describes shifts in the distribution and seasonality of plan and patient out-of-pocket spending from 2012 through 2021.

Study design: Analysis of multipayer commercial claims data.

Methods: Medical spending per enrollee was calculated by summing inpatient, outpatient, and professional services, which comprised plan payments and out-of-pocket payments (deductible, coinsurance, co-payment). To account for the long right tail of the spending distribution, enrollees were stratified by their decile of annual medical spending, and annual mean spending estimates were calculated overall and by decile. Mean spending estimates were also calculated by quarter-year.

Results: Inflation-adjusted medical spending grew most quickly among the highest decile of spenders, without proportional growth in their out-of-pocket expenses. Out-of-pocket spending increased for the majority of enrollees in our sample prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, in real dollars and as a share of total medical spending. Out-of-pocket spending was increasingly concentrated in the early months of the calendar year, driven by deductible spending, and was lower in 2020 and 2021, plausibly due to policies limiting cost sharing for COVID-19-related services.

Conclusions: Insurance is working well to protect the highest spenders at the cost of reduced insurance generosity among spenders elsewhere in the distribution. The increasing cross-subsidization among enrollees through cost-sharing design-vs premiums-is a trend to watch among rising public concerns about underinsurance and medical debt.

目的:通常用于研究纵向趋势的年度平均支出指标掩盖了分布和季节性变化,而这些变化与患者对医疗负担能力的看法以及医疗服务提供者的收款情况息息相关。本研究描述了从 2012 年到 2021 年计划和患者自付支出的分布和季节性变化:研究设计:分析多方商业索赔数据:每位参保者的医疗支出由住院、门诊和专业服务的总和计算得出,其中包括计划支付和自付支出(免赔额、共同保险、共付额)。为了考虑到支出分布的右长尾,参保者按其年度医疗支出的十分位数进行了分层,并计算了总体和十分位数的年度平均支出估算值。此外,还按季度计算了平均支出估计数:通货膨胀调整后的医疗支出在支出最高的十等分人群中增长最快,但他们的自付费用并没有相应增长。在 COVID-19 大流行之前,我们样本中的大多数参保者的自付支出都有所增加,无论是按实际美元计算,还是按其在医疗总支出中所占的比例计算。在免赔额支出的推动下,自付支出越来越集中在日历年的前几个月,而在 2020 年和 2021 年则有所降低,这可能是由于限制 COVID-19 相关服务费用分担的政策所致:结论:保险在保护高消费人群方面运作良好,但其代价是降低了分布中其他人群的保险慷慨程度。通过费用分担设计与保费之间的交叉补贴不断增加,这是公众对保险不足和医疗债务日益关注的一个趋势,值得关注。
{"title":"Beyond average spending: distributional and seasonal commercial insurance trends, 2012-2021.","authors":"Erin L Duffy, Sarah Green, Samantha Randall, Erin Trish","doi":"10.37765/ajmc.2024.89600","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.37765/ajmc.2024.89600","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The annual mean spending measures typically used to study longitudinal trends mask distributional and seasonal variation that is relevant to patients' perceptions of health care affordability and, in turn, provider collections. This study describes shifts in the distribution and seasonality of plan and patient out-of-pocket spending from 2012 through 2021.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Analysis of multipayer commercial claims data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Medical spending per enrollee was calculated by summing inpatient, outpatient, and professional services, which comprised plan payments and out-of-pocket payments (deductible, coinsurance, co-payment). To account for the long right tail of the spending distribution, enrollees were stratified by their decile of annual medical spending, and annual mean spending estimates were calculated overall and by decile. Mean spending estimates were also calculated by quarter-year.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Inflation-adjusted medical spending grew most quickly among the highest decile of spenders, without proportional growth in their out-of-pocket expenses. Out-of-pocket spending increased for the majority of enrollees in our sample prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, in real dollars and as a share of total medical spending. Out-of-pocket spending was increasingly concentrated in the early months of the calendar year, driven by deductible spending, and was lower in 2020 and 2021, plausibly due to policies limiting cost sharing for COVID-19-related services.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Insurance is working well to protect the highest spenders at the cost of reduced insurance generosity among spenders elsewhere in the distribution. The increasing cross-subsidization among enrollees through cost-sharing design-vs premiums-is a trend to watch among rising public concerns about underinsurance and medical debt.</p>","PeriodicalId":50808,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Managed Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142300102","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Knowledge, attitude, and practices regarding ChatGPT among health care professionals. 医护人员对 ChatGPT 的认识、态度和做法。
IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI: 10.37765/ajmc.2024.89604
Yang Li, Zhongying Li

Objective: To explore the knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) in regard to ChatGPT among health care professionals (HCPs).

Study design: Cross-sectional study.

Methods: This web-based cross-sectional study included HCPs working at the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University in China between August 2023 and September 2023. Participants unwilling to use ChatGPT were excluded. Correlations between KAP scores were evaluated by Pearson correlation analysis and structural equation modeling (SEM).

Results: A total of 543 valid questionnaires were collected; of these, 231 questionnaires (42.54%) were completed by male HCPs. Mean (SD) knowledge, attitude, and practice scores were 6.71 (3.24) (range, 0-12), 21.27 (2.73) (range, 6-30), and 47.91 (8.17) (range, 12-60), respectively, indicating poor knowledge (55.92%), positive attitudes (70.90%), and proactive practices (79.85%). The knowledge scores were positively correlated with attitude (Pearson r = 0.216; P < .001) and practice (Pearson r = 0.283; P < .001) scores, and the attitude scores were positively correlated with practice scores (Pearson r = 0.479; P < .001). SEM showed that knowledge influenced attitude positively (β = 0.498; P < .001) but negatively influenced practice part 1 (improving work efficiency and patient experience) (β = -0.301; P < .001), practice part 2 (helping advance medical research) (β = -0.436; P < .001), practice part 3 (assisting HCPs) (β = -0.338; P  < .001), and practice part 4 (the possibilities) (β = -0.242; P < .001). Attitude positively influenced practice part 1 (β = 1.430; P  < .001), practice part 2 (β = 1.581; P < .001), practice part 3 (β = 1.513; P < .001), and practice part 4 (β = 1.387; P < .001).

Conclusion: HCPs willing to use ChatGPT in China showed poor knowledge, positive attitudes, and proactive practices regarding ChatGPT.

研究目的研究设计:横断面研究:研究设计:横断面研究:这项基于网络的横断面研究纳入了 2023 年 8 月至 2023 年 9 月期间在中国安徽医科大学第一附属医院工作的医护人员。排除了不愿意使用 ChatGPT 的参与者。通过皮尔逊相关分析和结构方程模型(SEM)评估了KAP评分之间的相关性:共收集到 543 份有效问卷,其中 231 份(42.54%)由男性保健医生填写。知识、态度和实践得分的平均值(标清)分别为 6.71 (3.24)(范围,0-12)、21.27 (2.73)(范围,6-30)和 47.91 (8.17)(范围,12-60),表明知识贫乏(55.92%)、态度积极(70.90%)和实践主动(79.85%)。知识得分与态度呈正相关(Pearson r = 0.216;P 结论:知识得分与态度得分呈正相关(Pearson r = 0.216;P 结论:知识得分与态度得分呈正相关:在中国,愿意使用 ChatGPT 的 HCPs 对 ChatGPT 的认知度较低,态度积极,实践主动。
{"title":"Knowledge, attitude, and practices regarding ChatGPT among health care professionals.","authors":"Yang Li, Zhongying Li","doi":"10.37765/ajmc.2024.89604","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.37765/ajmc.2024.89604","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore the knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) in regard to ChatGPT among health care professionals (HCPs).</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This web-based cross-sectional study included HCPs working at the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University in China between August 2023 and September 2023. Participants unwilling to use ChatGPT were excluded. Correlations between KAP scores were evaluated by Pearson correlation analysis and structural equation modeling (SEM).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 543 valid questionnaires were collected; of these, 231 questionnaires (42.54%) were completed by male HCPs. Mean (SD) knowledge, attitude, and practice scores were 6.71 (3.24) (range, 0-12), 21.27 (2.73) (range, 6-30), and 47.91 (8.17) (range, 12-60), respectively, indicating poor knowledge (55.92%), positive attitudes (70.90%), and proactive practices (79.85%). The knowledge scores were positively correlated with attitude (Pearson r = 0.216; P < .001) and practice (Pearson r = 0.283; P < .001) scores, and the attitude scores were positively correlated with practice scores (Pearson r = 0.479; P < .001). SEM showed that knowledge influenced attitude positively (β = 0.498; P < .001) but negatively influenced practice part 1 (improving work efficiency and patient experience) (β = -0.301; P < .001), practice part 2 (helping advance medical research) (β = -0.436; P < .001), practice part 3 (assisting HCPs) (β = -0.338; P  < .001), and practice part 4 (the possibilities) (β = -0.242; P < .001). Attitude positively influenced practice part 1 (β = 1.430; P  < .001), practice part 2 (β = 1.581; P < .001), practice part 3 (β = 1.513; P < .001), and practice part 4 (β = 1.387; P < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>HCPs willing to use ChatGPT in China showed poor knowledge, positive attitudes, and proactive practices regarding ChatGPT.</p>","PeriodicalId":50808,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Managed Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142300106","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Leveraging predictive analytics to target payer-led medication adherence interventions. 利用预测分析技术,有针对性地采取由支付方主导的坚持用药干预措施。
IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI: 10.37765/ajmc.2024.89610
Pankhuri Sharma

This article examines how predictive analytics can enhance payer initiatives to improve medication adherence. Despite its known impact on health outcomes and costs, medication nonadherence remains a widespread and persistent challenge in health care. Although payers are increasingly involved in addressing nonadherence, traditional approaches typically lead to suboptimal results due to their reactive nature and generic intervention. With improved access to data and more sophisticated machine learning tools, there is a growing opportunity for payers to use predictive analytics to stratify and target members at high risk, predict potential primary and secondary nonadherence, and preemptively intervene with tailored solutions. The potential benefit of this approach includes prevention, not only resolution, of nonadherence and leads to improved health outcomes, reduced health care costs, and increased member satisfaction. The article also discusses potential caveats to consider, such as data sharing, bias mitigation, and regulatory compliance, when implementing predictive analytics in this context.

本文探讨了预测分析如何加强支付方改善用药依从性的举措。尽管不遵医嘱用药对健康结果和成本的影响众所周知,但它仍然是医疗保健领域一个普遍而持久的挑战。尽管支付方越来越多地参与到解决不坚持用药的问题中来,但传统方法由于其被动性和通用干预,通常会导致不理想的结果。随着数据获取能力的提高和机器学习工具的改进,支付方有越来越多的机会利用预测分析对高风险成员进行分层和定位,预测潜在的初级和中级不依从性,并通过量身定制的解决方案先发制人地进行干预。这种方法的潜在益处不仅在于解决不依从问题,还包括预防不依从问题,从而改善健康状况、降低医疗成本并提高会员满意度。文章还讨论了在此背景下实施预测分析时需要考虑的潜在注意事项,如数据共享、减少偏差和监管合规。
{"title":"Leveraging predictive analytics to target payer-led medication adherence interventions.","authors":"Pankhuri Sharma","doi":"10.37765/ajmc.2024.89610","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.37765/ajmc.2024.89610","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article examines how predictive analytics can enhance payer initiatives to improve medication adherence. Despite its known impact on health outcomes and costs, medication nonadherence remains a widespread and persistent challenge in health care. Although payers are increasingly involved in addressing nonadherence, traditional approaches typically lead to suboptimal results due to their reactive nature and generic intervention. With improved access to data and more sophisticated machine learning tools, there is a growing opportunity for payers to use predictive analytics to stratify and target members at high risk, predict potential primary and secondary nonadherence, and preemptively intervene with tailored solutions. The potential benefit of this approach includes prevention, not only resolution, of nonadherence and leads to improved health outcomes, reduced health care costs, and increased member satisfaction. The article also discusses potential caveats to consider, such as data sharing, bias mitigation, and regulatory compliance, when implementing predictive analytics in this context.</p>","PeriodicalId":50808,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Managed Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142300110","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
When is a network adequate? consumer perspectives on network adequacy definitions. 消费者对网络适当性定义的看法。
IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI: 10.37765/ajmc.2024.89601
Simon F Haeder, Wendy Yi Xu

Objectives: Most Americans have insurance that uses managed care arrangements. Regulators have long sought to ensure access to care through network adequacy regulations. However, consumers have largely been excluded from conversations about network adequacy. To our knowledge, our study is the first to assess consumer preferences for various definitions of network adequacy including those aimed at supporting health equity and reducing disparities.

Study design: We fielded a large and demographically diverse survey of US adults (N = 4008) from June 30 to July 2, 2023. The survey queried respondents about their perceptions of what adequate provider networks look like in the abstract.

Methods: Analyses were conducted using ordinary least squares regression with survey weights as well as t tests.

Results: Consumers were overwhelmingly supportive of standard definitions of adequacy focused on the number of providers and travel distance. Majorities also favored more expansive, health equity-focused definitions such as public transportation access, cultural competency, and lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT+)-inclusive care. Being a woman; having higher levels of education, worse health, and recent experiences with the medical system; and ease of completing administrative tasks were relatively consistent positive predictors of supporting more expansive definitions. More controversial definitions saw effects of partisanship and LGBT+ identification. Rurality, insurance status, education, and recent experiences with the medical system affected perceptions of reasonable appointment wait times and travel distances.

Conclusions: Our findings indicate that consumers have broad conceptions of network adequacy. Future work should assess consumer trade-offs in resource-constrained settings as well as perceptions of providers and carriers.

目标:大多数美国人都有使用管理性医疗安排的保险。长期以来,监管机构一直试图通过网络适当性法规来确保医疗服务的可及性。然而,消费者在很大程度上被排除在有关网络适当性的讨论之外。据我们所知,我们的研究是首次评估消费者对各种网络适当性定义的偏好,包括那些旨在支持健康公平和减少差异的定义:研究设计:我们于 2023 年 6 月 30 日至 7 月 2 日对美国成年人(N = 4008)进行了一次大规模的人口统计多元化调查。调查询问了受访者对适当医疗服务提供者网络的抽象看法:采用普通最小二乘法回归法、调查加权法和 t 检验法进行分析:绝大多数消费者支持以医疗服务提供者数量和旅行距离为重点的适当性标准定义。大多数人还赞成更宽泛的、注重健康公平的定义,如公共交通便利性、文化能力以及女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋和变性者(LGBT+)包容性护理。女性、受教育程度较高、健康状况较差、最近使用医疗系统的经历,以及完成行政任务的难易程度是支持更宽泛定义的相对一致的积极预测因素。对于更具争议性的定义,党派和 LGBT+ 认同会产生影响。农村地区、保险状况、教育程度和最近使用医疗系统的经历影响了对合理预约等待时间和旅行距离的看法:我们的研究结果表明,消费者对网络的适当性有广泛的概念。未来的工作应评估消费者在资源有限环境下的权衡以及对医疗服务提供者和运营商的看法。
{"title":"When is a network adequate? consumer perspectives on network adequacy definitions.","authors":"Simon F Haeder, Wendy Yi Xu","doi":"10.37765/ajmc.2024.89601","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.37765/ajmc.2024.89601","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Most Americans have insurance that uses managed care arrangements. Regulators have long sought to ensure access to care through network adequacy regulations. However, consumers have largely been excluded from conversations about network adequacy. To our knowledge, our study is the first to assess consumer preferences for various definitions of network adequacy including those aimed at supporting health equity and reducing disparities.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>We fielded a large and demographically diverse survey of US adults (N = 4008) from June 30 to July 2, 2023. The survey queried respondents about their perceptions of what adequate provider networks look like in the abstract.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Analyses were conducted using ordinary least squares regression with survey weights as well as t tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Consumers were overwhelmingly supportive of standard definitions of adequacy focused on the number of providers and travel distance. Majorities also favored more expansive, health equity-focused definitions such as public transportation access, cultural competency, and lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT+)-inclusive care. Being a woman; having higher levels of education, worse health, and recent experiences with the medical system; and ease of completing administrative tasks were relatively consistent positive predictors of supporting more expansive definitions. More controversial definitions saw effects of partisanship and LGBT+ identification. Rurality, insurance status, education, and recent experiences with the medical system affected perceptions of reasonable appointment wait times and travel distances.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings indicate that consumers have broad conceptions of network adequacy. Future work should assess consumer trade-offs in resource-constrained settings as well as perceptions of providers and carriers.</p>","PeriodicalId":50808,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Managed Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142300109","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
What value do teaching hospitals provide commercial beneficiaries when in an ACO? 在 ACO 中,教学医院能为商业受益人带来什么价值?
IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI: 10.37765/ajmc.2024.89607
Matthew C Baker, Theresa R F Dreyer, Erin Naomi Hahn, Keith A Horvath

Objectives: The number of commercial beneficiaries cared for by accountable care organizations (ACOs) is growing, but the literature examining their trends is nascent.

Study design: We examined commercial claims data from 2019 to 2021 to compare beneficiaries attributed to participants in Medicare Shared Savings Program ACOs with and without a major teaching hospital.

Methods: We calculated mortality and spending by setting for each ACO type by year.

Results: Compared with per-beneficiary rates at nonteaching ACOs, major teaching ACOs have lower mortality rates by up to 2.2 percentage points depending on the patient age group, $283 lower inpatient spending, and lower emergency department utilization in inpatient (-0.008) and outpatient (-0.013) settings, as well as $146 higher overall outpatient spending. Upward trends in mortality and beneficiary risk scores across both ACO types show disruption to health outcomes during COVID-19.

Conclusions: These results provide evidence that ACOs with major teaching hospitals may be more likely to achieve the value-based goals of ACOs. Means to accomplish those goals may include avoiding higher-intensity care and supporting access to lower-cost alternatives where clinically appropriate, such as reducing inpatient and emergency department stays by delivering timely, high-quality outpatient care.

研究目的由责任医疗组织(ACOs)提供医疗服务的商业受益人数量正在不断增加,但研究其发展趋势的文献却刚刚起步:研究设计:我们研究了 2019 年至 2021 年的商业索赔数据,以比较医疗保险共享储蓄计划 ACO 参与者的受益人有无主要教学医院:我们按年度计算了每种 ACO 类型的死亡率和支出:与非教学型 ACO 的人均受益率相比,主要教学型 ACO 的死亡率根据患者年龄组的不同最多可降低 2.2 个百分点,住院费用降低 283 美元,住院(-0.008)和门诊(-0.013)急诊使用率降低,门诊总费用增加 146 美元。两类 ACO 的死亡率和受益人风险评分均呈上升趋势,这表明 COVID-19 期间的健康结果受到了干扰:这些结果证明,拥有大型教学医院的 ACO 更有可能实现以价值为基础的 ACO 目标。实现这些目标的方法可能包括避免高强度护理,并在临床适当的情况下支持使用成本较低的替代方法,例如通过提供及时、优质的门诊护理来减少住院和急诊停留时间。
{"title":"What value do teaching hospitals provide commercial beneficiaries when in an ACO?","authors":"Matthew C Baker, Theresa R F Dreyer, Erin Naomi Hahn, Keith A Horvath","doi":"10.37765/ajmc.2024.89607","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.37765/ajmc.2024.89607","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The number of commercial beneficiaries cared for by accountable care organizations (ACOs) is growing, but the literature examining their trends is nascent.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>We examined commercial claims data from 2019 to 2021 to compare beneficiaries attributed to participants in Medicare Shared Savings Program ACOs with and without a major teaching hospital.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We calculated mortality and spending by setting for each ACO type by year.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with per-beneficiary rates at nonteaching ACOs, major teaching ACOs have lower mortality rates by up to 2.2 percentage points depending on the patient age group, $283 lower inpatient spending, and lower emergency department utilization in inpatient (-0.008) and outpatient (-0.013) settings, as well as $146 higher overall outpatient spending. Upward trends in mortality and beneficiary risk scores across both ACO types show disruption to health outcomes during COVID-19.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These results provide evidence that ACOs with major teaching hospitals may be more likely to achieve the value-based goals of ACOs. Means to accomplish those goals may include avoiding higher-intensity care and supporting access to lower-cost alternatives where clinically appropriate, such as reducing inpatient and emergency department stays by delivering timely, high-quality outpatient care.</p>","PeriodicalId":50808,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Managed Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142300113","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Maternal navigation: for the common good. 孕产妇导航:为了共同的利益。
IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI: 10.37765/ajmc.2024.89608
Mary Kay Paul

The US faces a maternal health crisis as overall maternal mortality rates continue to worsen. HHS, in its Healthy People 2030 report, indicates that women in the US are more likely to die from childbirth than are women in other developed countries. The cost of the maternal health crisis and its associated morbidities is estimated to be $32.3 billion from conception to 5 years postpartum, with $18.7 billion in medical costs and $13.6 billion in nonmedical costs. Under the current health care reimbursement system, health care providers alone have little short-term incentive to bear the cost for solutions or prevention strategies that could change the social and cultural factors affecting maternal outcomes. This article provides an overview of the crisis, along with its economic and societal costs, and the role of prenatal care and premature birth in this escalating problem. The article then proposes maternal navigation for pregnant patients who chronically miss prenatal care appointments as one way to reduce premature births and associated health care costs. Through intentional and focused investment in maternal navigation by payers and providers together, health outcomes can be improved and disparities can be reduced. As a result, payer and provider costs are reduced and the interests of all parties are advanced. A connected system of support that improves health outcomes and reduces health care costs for the most at-risk patients is an essential response to a crisis that affects not only the individual but also society.

美国面临着孕产妇健康危机,孕产妇总死亡率持续恶化。美国卫生与健康服务部在《2030 年健康人群》报告中指出,美国妇女死于分娩的几率高于其他发达国家的妇女。据估计,从受孕到产后 5 年,孕产妇健康危机及其相关发病率的成本高达 323 亿美元,其中医疗成本为 187 亿美元,非医疗成本为 136 亿美元。在目前的医疗报销制度下,医疗服务提供者在短期内几乎没有动力承担解决方案或预防策略的成本,而这些方案或策略可以改变影响孕产妇结局的社会和文化因素。本文概述了这一危机及其经济和社会成本,以及产前护理和早产在这一不断升级的问题中所扮演的角色。然后,文章提出为长期错过产前保健预约的孕妇提供孕产妇指导,以此作为减少早产和相关医疗费用的一种方法。通过付款人和医疗服务提供者共同对孕产妇导航进行有目的、有重点的投资,可以改善健康结果,减少差异。因此,支付方和医疗服务提供者的成本都会降低,各方的利益都会得到促进。建立一个相互连接的支持系统,改善高危患者的健康状况并降低医疗成本,是应对这场不仅影响个人而且影响社会的危机的重要措施。
{"title":"Maternal navigation: for the common good.","authors":"Mary Kay Paul","doi":"10.37765/ajmc.2024.89608","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.37765/ajmc.2024.89608","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The US faces a maternal health crisis as overall maternal mortality rates continue to worsen. HHS, in its Healthy People 2030 report, indicates that women in the US are more likely to die from childbirth than are women in other developed countries. The cost of the maternal health crisis and its associated morbidities is estimated to be $32.3 billion from conception to 5 years postpartum, with $18.7 billion in medical costs and $13.6 billion in nonmedical costs. Under the current health care reimbursement system, health care providers alone have little short-term incentive to bear the cost for solutions or prevention strategies that could change the social and cultural factors affecting maternal outcomes. This article provides an overview of the crisis, along with its economic and societal costs, and the role of prenatal care and premature birth in this escalating problem. The article then proposes maternal navigation for pregnant patients who chronically miss prenatal care appointments as one way to reduce premature births and associated health care costs. Through intentional and focused investment in maternal navigation by payers and providers together, health outcomes can be improved and disparities can be reduced. As a result, payer and provider costs are reduced and the interests of all parties are advanced. A connected system of support that improves health outcomes and reduces health care costs for the most at-risk patients is an essential response to a crisis that affects not only the individual but also society.</p>","PeriodicalId":50808,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Managed Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142300111","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Antihyperglycemic treatment patterns for chronic kidney disease and type 2 diabetes. 慢性肾病和 2 型糖尿病的降糖治疗模式。
IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI: 10.37765/ajmc.2024.89599
Keith A Betts, Nikolaus G Oberprieler, Aozhou Wu, Glen James, Scott Beeman, Alain Gay, Xuanhao He, David Vizcaya

Objective: Patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) are at high risk for developing chronic kidney disease (CKD). The onset of incident CKD may complicate glycemic control among these patients. This study aimed to characterize antihyperglycemic medication use after incident CKD onset among patients with T2D to inform disease management.

Study design: Retrospective cohort study.

Methods: Patients with incident CKD and prior T2D were identified from the Optum electronic health records database between March 2013 and September 2021. Patterns of antihyperglycemic use were assessed during the 1-year baseline period and after incident CKD diagnosis and described by baseline hemoglobin A1C (HbA1C) level (controlled [< 7%] vs elevated [≥ 7%]) and CKD severity.

Results: The study consisted of 262,395 patients, of whom 51% had elevated HbA1C. After CKD onset, 23.9% of patients initiated new antihyperglycemics within 1 year. Patients with elevated HbA1C had shorter time to new treatment initiation compared with those with controlled HbA1C (median, 28.7 vs 83.7 months). Patients with elevated urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio (uACR) had shorter median time to new treatment initiation (39.9-42.4 months) than those with normal uACR (59.8 months). Less than 7% of patients with stage 3 CKD and even smaller percentages of patients with higher stages of CKD utilized glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors.

Conclusions: Treatment of T2D was considerably heterogenous by HbA1C level and CKD severity in patients with incident CKD. Current agents may not sufficiently fulfill the unmet need of T2D management in patients with CKD.

目的:2 型糖尿病(T2D)患者罹患慢性肾病(CKD)的风险很高。慢性肾脏病的发生可能会使这些患者的血糖控制复杂化。本研究旨在了解 T2D 患者在发生 CKD 后使用降糖药物的情况,为疾病管理提供依据:研究设计:回顾性队列研究:2013年3月至2021年9月期间,从Optum电子健康记录数据库中识别出患有慢性肾脏病和T2D的患者。在 1 年基线期间和诊断出 CKD 事件后,对患者使用降糖药的模式进行了评估,并通过基线血红蛋白 A1C (HbA1C) 水平(受控[结果])进行了描述:研究包括 262,395 名患者,其中 51% 的患者 HbA1C 升高。慢性肾脏病发病后,23.9% 的患者在 1 年内开始服用新的降糖药。与 HbA1C 受控的患者相比,HbA1C 升高的患者开始接受新治疗的时间较短(中位数为 28.7 个月对 83.7 个月)。尿白蛋白与肌酐比值(uACR)升高的患者开始新治疗的中位时间(39.9-42.4 个月)比尿白蛋白与肌酐比值正常的患者(59.8 个月)短。使用胰高血糖素样肽 1 受体激动剂和钠-葡萄糖共转运体 2 抑制剂的 3 期 CKD 患者不到 7%,更高阶段 CKD 患者的比例甚至更低:结论:在慢性肾脏病患者中,不同的 HbA1C 水平和慢性肾脏病严重程度对 T2D 的治疗存在很大差异。目前的药物可能无法充分满足慢性肾脏病患者治疗 T2D 的需求。
{"title":"Antihyperglycemic treatment patterns for chronic kidney disease and type 2 diabetes.","authors":"Keith A Betts, Nikolaus G Oberprieler, Aozhou Wu, Glen James, Scott Beeman, Alain Gay, Xuanhao He, David Vizcaya","doi":"10.37765/ajmc.2024.89599","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.37765/ajmc.2024.89599","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) are at high risk for developing chronic kidney disease (CKD). The onset of incident CKD may complicate glycemic control among these patients. This study aimed to characterize antihyperglycemic medication use after incident CKD onset among patients with T2D to inform disease management.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with incident CKD and prior T2D were identified from the Optum electronic health records database between March 2013 and September 2021. Patterns of antihyperglycemic use were assessed during the 1-year baseline period and after incident CKD diagnosis and described by baseline hemoglobin A1C (HbA1C) level (controlled [< 7%] vs elevated [≥ 7%]) and CKD severity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study consisted of 262,395 patients, of whom 51% had elevated HbA1C. After CKD onset, 23.9% of patients initiated new antihyperglycemics within 1 year. Patients with elevated HbA1C had shorter time to new treatment initiation compared with those with controlled HbA1C (median, 28.7 vs 83.7 months). Patients with elevated urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio (uACR) had shorter median time to new treatment initiation (39.9-42.4 months) than those with normal uACR (59.8 months). Less than 7% of patients with stage 3 CKD and even smaller percentages of patients with higher stages of CKD utilized glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Treatment of T2D was considerably heterogenous by HbA1C level and CKD severity in patients with incident CKD. Current agents may not sufficiently fulfill the unmet need of T2D management in patients with CKD.</p>","PeriodicalId":50808,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Managed Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142300101","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
American Journal of Managed Care
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1