Background: Malnutrition is common in critically ill patients and is associated with poor clinical outcomes. It can be more accurately diagnosed using integrative tools.
Objectives: This study aimed to pool malnutrition prevalence in critically ill adults and estimate the accuracy of different tools and its association with clinical outcomes.
Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies reporting malnutrition prevalence in patients admitted to intensive unit care (ICUs). PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched until 18 September, 2024, without any restrictions. Studies using ≥1 integrative tool were eligible. Outcomes tested for predictive validity included ICU or hospital mortality and length of stay. Two reviewers independently screened studies and extracted data. Risk of bias and publication bias were assessed. Meta-analyses were performed using a random-effects model. Concurrent validity of global leadership international malnutrition (GLIM) and Academic Nutrition and Dietetics and American Society of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (AND-ASPEN) criteria were tested with subjective global assessment as reference. Certainty of evidence was rated by Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation.
Results: Sixty-six studies were included (66.7% prospective cohorts, 83.3% single-center, and 24.2% from Brazil). Malnutrition prevalence (n = 64 studies, 19,718 patients) was 45.0% [95% confidence interval (CI): 41.0%, 50.0%, I2 = 97.4%], influenced by the ICU type, continent, and diagnostic tool. GLIM showed specificity of 81.2% (95% CI: 74.1%, 86.1%) and sensitivity of 86.7% (95% CI: 80.1%, 90.9%). AND-ASPEN specificity and sensitivity were 84.2% (95% CI: 78.5%, 87.6%) and 84.8% (95% CI: 79.4%, 88.2%), respectively. Malnutrition was associated with higher mortality risk (relative risk = 2.00, 95% CI: 1.68, 2.39, I2 = 72.8%), longer ICU stay [mean difference (MD) = 1.60 d, 95% CI: 0.54, 2.67, I2 = 96.6%], and longer hospital stay (MD = 4.04 d, 95% CI: 0.60, 7.47, I2 = 97.2%). Most studies had a high risk of bias, and the certainty of evidence was very low for all outcomes.
Conclusions: The prevalence of malnutrition was 45%, associated with an increased risk of death and longer ICU and hospital stays, but the certainty of evidence was very low.
扫码关注我们
求助内容:
应助结果提醒方式:
