Amphibians exhibit a large diversity in reproductive and developmental strategies, which in turn are linked to their body size, life history and habitat. Here, we explore why terrestrial egg laying frogs are on average smaller than aquatic egg laying ones and whether this pattern also exists in salamanders. We hypothesized that egg deposition site and body mass are not linked directly across species, but that terrestrial egg layers occur in climates and use microhabitats that favor small masses. To test this, we compiled a dataset on egg deposition site (terrestrial or aquatic), development mode (biphasic with larvae or direct development without larvae), body mass, microhabitat use (water-dependent, ground-dwelling or arboreal) and climate within their distribution area (temperature, precipitation and seasonality in both) of 3091 frog and 244 salamander species. We analyzed the interrelations between these traits and environmental factors by using a cross-species approach and phylogenetic generalized least squares analysis. Body masses increased along a gradient from warm, humid and unseasonal climates to cold, dry and seasonal climates in frogs and salamanders. Terrestrial egg deposition was constrained to warm, humid and unseasonal climates only in frogs. Terrestrial eggs and an arboreal microhabitat use were linked in frogs and salamanders, and arboreal frogs were smaller than non-arboreal ones. We confirmed that frogs with terrestrial eggs had smaller average body masses than those with aquatic eggs, irrespective of their development mode, but this difference disappeared when we corrected body masses for the effects of climate and microhabitat use. In salamanders, however, egg deposition site and development mode were neither directly related to body mass, nor indirectly via the effects of climate and microhabitat use. Our results suggest that thermal and hydric environmental conditions determine the geographical distribution of body mass and reproductive strategies in amphibians and set the framework for their evolution.
{"title":"Disentangling the interrelations of body mass, egg deposition site, climate and microhabitat use in frogs and salamanders","authors":"Benjamin Cejp, Eva Maria Griebeler","doi":"10.1002/ecog.08109","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ecog.08109","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Amphibians exhibit a large diversity in reproductive and developmental strategies, which in turn are linked to their body size, life history and habitat. Here, we explore why terrestrial egg laying frogs are on average smaller than aquatic egg laying ones and whether this pattern also exists in salamanders. We hypothesized that egg deposition site and body mass are not linked directly across species, but that terrestrial egg layers occur in climates and use microhabitats that favor small masses. To test this, we compiled a dataset on egg deposition site (terrestrial or aquatic), development mode (biphasic with larvae or direct development without larvae), body mass, microhabitat use (water-dependent, ground-dwelling or arboreal) and climate within their distribution area (temperature, precipitation and seasonality in both) of 3091 frog and 244 salamander species. We analyzed the interrelations between these traits and environmental factors by using a cross-species approach and phylogenetic generalized least squares analysis. Body masses increased along a gradient from warm, humid and unseasonal climates to cold, dry and seasonal climates in frogs and salamanders. Terrestrial egg deposition was constrained to warm, humid and unseasonal climates only in frogs. Terrestrial eggs and an arboreal microhabitat use were linked in frogs and salamanders, and arboreal frogs were smaller than non-arboreal ones. We confirmed that frogs with terrestrial eggs had smaller average body masses than those with aquatic eggs, irrespective of their development mode, but this difference disappeared when we corrected body masses for the effects of climate and microhabitat use. In salamanders, however, egg deposition site and development mode were neither directly related to body mass, nor indirectly via the effects of climate and microhabitat use. Our results suggest that thermal and hydric environmental conditions determine the geographical distribution of body mass and reproductive strategies in amphibians and set the framework for their evolution.</p>","PeriodicalId":51026,"journal":{"name":"Ecography","volume":"2025 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2025-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://nsojournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ecog.08109","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145255026","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Sebastian Steibl, Simon Steiger, Luís Valente, James C. Russell
The positive relationship between species richness and area is regarded as one of the few laws in ecology. Therefore, deviations from predictable species–area scaling, evident as high residual variance in species–area curves, are often interpreted as anomalous behaviour. Small-island systems often do not conform to species–area relationships, yet the high stochasticity in their species–area curves is frequently treated as unexplainable noise or attributed to idiosyncratic extinction rates. Here, we introduce a statistical framework that incorporates the degree of stochasticity in species–area relationships as an explicit, interpretable model parameter. Using a global island plant dataset for atolls (378 islands across 19 atolls) – prototypical examples for small-island dynamics – we show that the degree of residual variance in species–area curves can be captured, modelled, and linked to environmental conditions. Our heteroscedastic modelling approach demonstrates that apparent stochasticity in species–area relationships is not random but predictable through environmental drivers. Specifically, we found that increased rainfall reduces the residual variance around the species–area curve, indicating that resource availability is a critical factor enabling conformity to species–area scaling. Cyclone disturbance frequency did not drive stochasticity, challenging the prevailing view that disturbance regimes drive the stochasticity in species–area scaling on small islands. By treating residual variance as an explicit model parameter in species–area relationships rather than unexplainable noise, our approach provides new insights into the conditions enabling biological communities to conform to species–area scaling. Shifting the focus in species–area studies on the residual variance as an interpretable model parameter that captures the degree of conformity to species–area scaling offers novel perspectives into the environmental factors prerequisite for species–area scaling. This contributes to unifying the apparent anomalous, stochastic nature of small-island systems with the general law of linear species–area scaling.
{"title":"Rainfall increases conformity and strength of species–area relationships","authors":"Sebastian Steibl, Simon Steiger, Luís Valente, James C. Russell","doi":"10.1002/ecog.08159","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ecog.08159","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The positive relationship between species richness and area is regarded as one of the few laws in ecology. Therefore, deviations from predictable species–area scaling, evident as high residual variance in species–area curves, are often interpreted as anomalous behaviour. Small-island systems often do not conform to species–area relationships, yet the high stochasticity in their species–area curves is frequently treated as unexplainable noise or attributed to idiosyncratic extinction rates. Here, we introduce a statistical framework that incorporates the degree of stochasticity in species–area relationships as an explicit, interpretable model parameter. Using a global island plant dataset for atolls (378 islands across 19 atolls) – prototypical examples for small-island dynamics – we show that the degree of residual variance in species–area curves can be captured, modelled, and linked to environmental conditions. Our heteroscedastic modelling approach demonstrates that apparent stochasticity in species–area relationships is not random but predictable through environmental drivers. Specifically, we found that increased rainfall reduces the residual variance around the species–area curve, indicating that resource availability is a critical factor enabling conformity to species–area scaling. Cyclone disturbance frequency did not drive stochasticity, challenging the prevailing view that disturbance regimes drive the stochasticity in species–area scaling on small islands. By treating residual variance as an explicit model parameter in species–area relationships rather than unexplainable noise, our approach provides new insights into the conditions enabling biological communities to conform to species–area scaling. Shifting the focus in species–area studies on the residual variance as an interpretable model parameter that captures the degree of conformity to species–area scaling offers novel perspectives into the environmental factors prerequisite for species–area scaling. This contributes to unifying the apparent anomalous, stochastic nature of small-island systems with the general law of linear species–area scaling.</p>","PeriodicalId":51026,"journal":{"name":"Ecography","volume":"2025 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2025-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://nsojournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ecog.08159","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145254949","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Tuija Maliniemi, Petteri Kiilunen, Kari Anne Bråthen, Jutta Kapfer, Torunn Bockelie Rosendal, John-Arvid Grytnes, Patrick Saccone, Risto Virtanen
Boreal and tundra plant communities are expected to change in biodiversity due to increasing global change pressures such as climate warming. One long-term scenario is increasing compositional similarity, i.e. biotic homogenization, which has been relatively little studied in high-latitude plant communities. Here, we study how the composition and diversity of heathland and tundra plant communities have changed in northern Fennoscandia over several decades. In 2013–2023, we resurveyed 275 historic vegetation plots, originally surveyed in 1964–1975, with percentage covers for vascular plant, bryophyte and lichen species. We analyzed temporal changes in community composition and diversity across the study area and in different biogeographic zones, continentality-humidity classes and habitat types. We found a strong homogenization trend across the study area, with plant communities becoming more similar in composition over the decades when all taxa were treated together. The observed homogenization was driven especially by the increased similarity of vascular plant and lichen communities and was largely independent of biogeographic zones or continentality-humidity gradient. Homogenization was particularly associated with the drastic encroachment of the evergreen dwarf shrub Empetrum nigrum in habitat types originally dominated by other species, and with the decrease in lichen cover. In general, our findings suggest that Fennoscandian heathland and tundra vegetation is transforming towards a more homogeneous evergreen dwarf shrub-dominated system, which may threaten ecosystem multifunctionality. Our results highlight the importance of exploring biodiversity among different metrics and growth forms to understand the overall changes in heathland and tundra biodiversity.
{"title":"Long-term homogenization of Fennoscandian heathland and tundra vegetation is connected to the expansion of an allelopathic dwarf shrub","authors":"Tuija Maliniemi, Petteri Kiilunen, Kari Anne Bråthen, Jutta Kapfer, Torunn Bockelie Rosendal, John-Arvid Grytnes, Patrick Saccone, Risto Virtanen","doi":"10.1002/ecog.07921","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ecog.07921","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Boreal and tundra plant communities are expected to change in biodiversity due to increasing global change pressures such as climate warming. One long-term scenario is increasing compositional similarity, i.e. biotic homogenization, which has been relatively little studied in high-latitude plant communities. Here, we study how the composition and diversity of heathland and tundra plant communities have changed in northern Fennoscandia over several decades. In 2013–2023, we resurveyed 275 historic vegetation plots, originally surveyed in 1964–1975, with percentage covers for vascular plant, bryophyte and lichen species. We analyzed temporal changes in community composition and diversity across the study area and in different biogeographic zones, continentality-humidity classes and habitat types. We found a strong homogenization trend across the study area, with plant communities becoming more similar in composition over the decades when all taxa were treated together. The observed homogenization was driven especially by the increased similarity of vascular plant and lichen communities and was largely independent of biogeographic zones or continentality-humidity gradient. Homogenization was particularly associated with the drastic encroachment of the evergreen dwarf shrub <i>Empetrum nigrum</i> in habitat types originally dominated by other species, and with the decrease in lichen cover. In general, our findings suggest that Fennoscandian heathland and tundra vegetation is transforming towards a more homogeneous evergreen dwarf shrub-dominated system, which may threaten ecosystem multifunctionality. Our results highlight the importance of exploring biodiversity among different metrics and growth forms to understand the overall changes in heathland and tundra biodiversity.</p>","PeriodicalId":51026,"journal":{"name":"Ecography","volume":"2025 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2025-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://nsojournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ecog.07921","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145254953","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Between the 16th and the 20th centuries, European countries established vast colonial empires on all continents. These empires triggered profound environmental, demographic and economic transformations. It is likely that many non-native species have benefited from the newly emerged trade network between European countries and their colonies to spread to new regions, leading to an increase in invasions across countries that belonged to these empires. However, this hypothesis has not been tested, and it is still unknown whether colonial empires influenced non-native species richness and invasion dynamics over the last centuries. Here, we show that prior to 1960, countries that belonged to a colonial empire received more than twice as many non-native ant species than those that did not. During that period, ant species native to parts of an empire spread preferentially to other countries within the same empire. However, after 1960 former colonial ties had no longer an effect on ant introductions. We also found that colonized countries were the most important source of non-native ants, contradicting the ‘Imperialist dogma'. Overall, our findings show that ant invasion dynamics were shaped by the rise and fall of European colonial empires, transitioning from empire-centered invasions before 1960 to a truly global spread of species in the more recent decades.
{"title":"European colonial empires accelerated ant invasions","authors":"Aymeric Bonnamour, Cleo Bertelsmeier","doi":"10.1002/ecog.07887","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ecog.07887","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Between the 16th and the 20th centuries, European countries established vast colonial empires on all continents. These empires triggered profound environmental, demographic and economic transformations. It is likely that many non-native species have benefited from the newly emerged trade network between European countries and their colonies to spread to new regions, leading to an increase in invasions across countries that belonged to these empires. However, this hypothesis has not been tested, and it is still unknown whether colonial empires influenced non-native species richness and invasion dynamics over the last centuries. Here, we show that prior to 1960, countries that belonged to a colonial empire received more than twice as many non-native ant species than those that did not. During that period, ant species native to parts of an empire spread preferentially to other countries within the same empire. However, after 1960 former colonial ties had no longer an effect on ant introductions. We also found that colonized countries were the most important source of non-native ants, contradicting the ‘Imperialist dogma'. Overall, our findings show that ant invasion dynamics were shaped by the rise and fall of European colonial empires, transitioning from empire-centered invasions before 1960 to a truly global spread of species in the more recent decades.</p>","PeriodicalId":51026,"journal":{"name":"Ecography","volume":"2025 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2025-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://nsojournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ecog.07887","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145260583","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Laura Kragh Frederiksen, Wolf L. Eiserhardt, Hanna Tuomisto
Understanding how the remarkable biodiversity of the American tropics developed has been a long-standing question, yet knowledge gaps remain. Previous studies examined the roles of bioregions in shaping diversity patterns but often overlooked speciation, a critical driver of species richness, and insufficiently accounted for temporal changes in speciation and dispersal dynamics. To address this, we investigated the temporal mechanisms of speciation and dispersal that have shaped diversity in the American tropics using ferns (Polypodiopsida) as a model group across nine bioregions. We employed biogeographic stochastic mapping (BSM) and a large-scale phylogenetic tree alongside extensive occurrence records to infer historical patterns of speciation and dispersal. We find that the American tropics function as a biogeographical maze composed of interconnected corridors, characterised by high emigration and immigration rates, rather than isolated regions. The Andes emerged prominently as a biodiversity radiator, playing a dual role by generating substantial species richness through speciation and acting as a primary source of dispersal to neighbouring regions. This unique position underscores the Andes' pivotal role in structuring fern diversity across the American tropics, contrasting with the Amazonian-centred patterns typically observed in angiosperms. Our findings highlight the critical importance of considering speciation and historical contexts in relation to changing environments when interpreting patterns of tropical biodiversity.
{"title":"Speciation, dispersal and the build-up of fern diversity in the American tropics","authors":"Laura Kragh Frederiksen, Wolf L. Eiserhardt, Hanna Tuomisto","doi":"10.1002/ecog.08170","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ecog.08170","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Understanding how the remarkable biodiversity of the American tropics developed has been a long-standing question, yet knowledge gaps remain. Previous studies examined the roles of bioregions in shaping diversity patterns but often overlooked speciation, a critical driver of species richness, and insufficiently accounted for temporal changes in speciation and dispersal dynamics. To address this, we investigated the temporal mechanisms of speciation and dispersal that have shaped diversity in the American tropics using ferns (Polypodiopsida) as a model group across nine bioregions. We employed biogeographic stochastic mapping (BSM) and a large-scale phylogenetic tree alongside extensive occurrence records to infer historical patterns of speciation and dispersal. We find that the American tropics function as a biogeographical maze composed of interconnected corridors, characterised by high emigration and immigration rates, rather than isolated regions. The Andes emerged prominently as a biodiversity radiator, playing a dual role by generating substantial species richness through speciation and acting as a primary source of dispersal to neighbouring regions. This unique position underscores the Andes' pivotal role in structuring fern diversity across the American tropics, contrasting with the Amazonian-centred patterns typically observed in angiosperms. Our findings highlight the critical importance of considering speciation and historical contexts in relation to changing environments when interpreting patterns of tropical biodiversity.</p>","PeriodicalId":51026,"journal":{"name":"Ecography","volume":"2025 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2025-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://nsojournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ecog.08170","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145209656","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
There is much contention over the causes and correlates of megafaunal extinctions at the end of the Pleistocene. A major role for human impact such as hunting has been discussed widely. If correct, the overkill hypothesis explains not only why large mammals in general were highly prone to extinction but suggests that extinction may have been selective within large mammals. Among other things, it has been argued that extinct large mammals tended to be large and have small brains. Here we test these hypotheses using a comprehensive global dataset of 22 ecological and life history traits mapped to 120 living and 14 extinct carnivore species. The data document occurrences within 260 distinct fossil assemblages that span the Late Pleistocene and Holocene. To address collinearity and phylogenetic autocorrelation, we first perform least-squares orthogonalisation of the predictor variables and then use phylogenetic comparative methods to carry out regressions. Only basal metabolic rate and diurnality are robust predictors of extinction, even after accounting for phylogenetic and trait uncertainty. Furthermore, we show that living carnivores with high metabolic rates are more likely to be threatened and address the implications for conservation and the current extinction crisis.
{"title":"Extinct Pleistocene carnivores were diurnal and highly active","authors":"Orlin S. Todorov, John Alroy","doi":"10.1002/ecog.08061","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ecog.08061","url":null,"abstract":"<p>There is much contention over the causes and correlates of megafaunal extinctions at the end of the Pleistocene. A major role for human impact such as hunting has been discussed widely. If correct, the overkill hypothesis explains not only why large mammals in general were highly prone to extinction but suggests that extinction may have been selective within large mammals. Among other things, it has been argued that extinct large mammals tended to be large and have small brains. Here we test these hypotheses using a comprehensive global dataset of 22 ecological and life history traits mapped to 120 living and 14 extinct carnivore species. The data document occurrences within 260 distinct fossil assemblages that span the Late Pleistocene and Holocene. To address collinearity and phylogenetic autocorrelation, we first perform least-squares orthogonalisation of the predictor variables and then use phylogenetic comparative methods to carry out regressions. Only basal metabolic rate and diurnality are robust predictors of extinction, even after accounting for phylogenetic and trait uncertainty. Furthermore, we show that living carnivores with high metabolic rates are more likely to be threatened and address the implications for conservation and the current extinction crisis.</p>","PeriodicalId":51026,"journal":{"name":"Ecography","volume":"2025 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2025-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://nsojournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ecog.08061","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145209657","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
<p>After two decades of service to <i>Ecography</i> – first as a subject editor, then as deputy Editor-in-Chief, and for the past twelve years as Editor-in-Chief – the time has come for me to bid farewell. My connection with the journal stretches even further back: <i>Ecography</i> was one of the first outlets where I published work from my PhD. At that time, manuscripts were submitted by printing multiple copies and sending them by post to Linus Svensson, who for several decades loyally served the Nordic Society Oikos – the society that publishes <i>Ecography</i> – before his recent retirement. From the editorial office, Linus would then mail the manuscripts to reviewers together with a request to review the paper. Since reviewers could decline, the process could take several months just to manage submissions, and it was not unusual for a paper to take several years from submission to publication. First as an author, and later as an editor, I strongly advocated for reform, and as digitisation advanced, we finally arrived at the streamlined submission process we use today.</p><p><i>Ecography</i> is a truly special society journal. It has traditionally had a strong focus on biogeography and macroecology, yet it distinguishes itself from similarly profiled journals by its openness to other fields of ecology with a strong spatial or temporal component. When I took over the Editor-in-Chief role, I was determined to maintain this broad scope already pursued by my predecessor, Carsten Rahbek, while also pursuing carefully targeted expansions into related fields, such as ecological epidemiology and experimental macroecology. The urgency of including ecological epidemiology became especially evident during the COVID-19 pandemic. We achieved this goal by appointing editors with expertise in these areas and by preparing special issues dedicated to these themes (Guégan et al. <span>2024</span>, whole special issue here: https://nsojournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/toc/16000587/2024/2024/1).</p><p>The journal itself has undergone significant transformation. Founded in 1978 as <i>Holarctic Ecology</i> under the editorship of Rolf Vik (University of Oslo, Norway), it was restructured in 1992 to become <i>Ecography</i>, subsequently led by a distinguished line of Editors-in-Chief: Nils Malmer (1992–1993, Lund University, Sweden), Sven Jonasson (1993–1996, University of Copenhagen, Denmark), Esa Ranta (1996–2002, University of Helsinki, Finland), Martin Zobel (2002–2005, University of Tartu, Estonia), and Carsten Rahbek (2005–2013, University of Copenhagen, Denmark).</p><p>Today, <i>Ecography</i> is firmly established as a leading outlet in ecology and biogeography. Along the way, it has developed several distinctive sections that set it apart from other journals: Forum papers, which present short and challenging contributions at the forefront of ecology and biogeography, often multidisciplinary and conceptually innovative; Review and Synthesis papers, which prov
我为《生态》杂志服务了二十年,先是担任专题编辑,然后担任副总编辑,在过去的十二年里担任总编辑,现在是告别的时候了。我与这本杂志的联系甚至可以追溯到更早以前:《生态学》是我发表博士论文的第一个渠道之一。当时,手稿是通过印刷多份并邮寄给Linus Svensson的方式提交的,Linus Svensson在最近退休之前为北欧协会Oikos(出版生态学的协会)忠诚地服务了几十年。然后,莱纳斯会从编辑部把手稿寄给审稿人,并请求审稿。由于审稿人可能会拒绝,这个过程可能需要几个月的时间来管理提交的论文,而一篇论文从提交到发表需要几年的时间也并不罕见。首先作为一个作者,后来作为一个编辑,我强烈主张改革,随着数字化的推进,我们最终达到了我们今天使用的简化的提交流程。生态学是一种真正特殊的社会期刊。它传统上非常关注生物地理学和宏观生态学,但它与类似概况的期刊的区别在于它对其他具有强烈空间或时间成分的生态学领域的开放性。当我接任总编辑的角色时,我决心保持我的前任Carsten Rahbek已经追求的广泛范围,同时也谨慎地有针对性地扩展到相关领域,如生态流行病学和实验宏观生态学。在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,纳入生态流行病学的紧迫性尤为明显。为了实现这一目标,我们任命了在这些领域具有专业知识的编辑,并准备了专门针对这些主题的特刊(gusamugan et al. 2024,整期特刊在这里:https://nsojournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/toc/16000587/2024/2024/1).The期刊本身发生了重大转变。它成立于1978年,在Rolf Vik(挪威奥斯陆大学)的编辑下,作为Holarctic Ecology,它于1992年重组为Ecography,随后由杰出的总编辑领导:Nils Malmer(1992-1993,瑞典隆德大学)、Sven Jonasson(1993-1996,丹麦哥本哈根大学)、Esa Ranta(1996-2002,芬兰赫尔辛基大学)、Martin Zobel(2002-2005,爱沙尼亚塔尔图大学)和Carsten Rahbek(2005-2013,丹麦哥本哈根大学)。今天,Ecography已牢固确立为生态学和生物地理学的领先出路。在此过程中,它发展了几个独特的部分,使其与其他期刊区别开来:论坛论文,在生态学和生物地理学的前沿提出简短而具有挑战性的贡献,通常是多学科和概念创新;综述和综合论文,对快速发展的主题提供重点、关键的评估,并提出新的假设或方法;软件说明,突出时空生态学中最好的新工具,确保广泛传播和可及性;《新闻与观点》(News & Views),对发表在该杂志上的令人兴奋的最新研究提供简明易懂的评论;和Brevia,以清晰易懂的方式撰写重要新发现的简短报告,具有广泛的意义。总之,这些举措丰富了生态地理学,促进了贡献的多样性,远远超出了标准的研究文章。当我担任EiC的角色时,Ecography的财政支持来自其姊妹期刊Oikos的盈余。我任职期间的主要挑战之一是监督向开放获取的过渡——与许多其他期刊不同,这一过程进行得非常顺利(Araújo et al. 2019)。随着这种转变,生态学开始自我维持。今天,它产生了盈余,确保了它的长期生存能力,同时也直接为社区做出了贡献——例如,通过E4奖为早期职业研究人员领导的评审提供支持,支持基于社会的会议,学生优秀奖和旅行奖,以及根据具体情况提供开放获取费用减免。这些年来,我们还有意识地努力保持编辑部在主题、性别和地区方面的平衡。实现完美的平衡并不总是可能的,因为更广泛的科学界的不平等不可避免地会在编辑结构中产生回响。然而,追求公平和包容仍然是一个指导原则——从不以牺牲质量为代价,而是在坚持最高科学标准的同时,用不同的观点丰富期刊。与此同时,我意识到新的挑战已经在塑造学术出版的格局。 其中之一是需要应对日益激进的出版生态系统,在这个生态系统中,对知名度和影响力的竞争有时会掩盖科学的完整性和社区价值。另一个是由于全球合作的削弱而导致的不平等现象的增加,这有可能使弱势地区的声音被边缘化,并破坏生态研究的国际性。进一步的挑战在于,在一个发展速度越来越快的世界中,如何维护同行评议的完整性,而合格和愿意的评议者的可用性却越来越有限。在此基础上,我们可能会增加越来越大的压力,将技术进步(如人工智能辅助工具)整合到编辑和审查过程中,在效率与严谨和公平之间取得平衡。这些都不是简单的挑战,但它们也是机遇(McGill Brian et al. 2018)。解决这些问题需要韧性、创造力和强烈的社区意识。我相信,《生态地理学》作为一份深深扎根于服务而非盈利的社会期刊,有能力驾驭未来,并在新的领导下继续在生态学和生物地理学领域发挥主导作用。为这个社区服务是我的荣幸和荣幸。我非常感谢我有幸与之共事的敬业的编辑团队——包括我们的总编辑Maria Persson,她负责监督期刊的日常管理——感谢北欧学会Oikos董事会多年来对我的信任,也感谢审稿人和作者,他们的贡献是期刊的命脉。我现在向我的继任者Christine Meynard致以最良好的祝愿,她将成为《生态》杂志第一位女性(也是拉丁美洲)总编辑。我相信,在她的领导下,《华尔街日报》将继续蓬勃发展,扩大规模,并激发人们的灵感。Miguel B. AraújoEditor-in-Chief生态学家
{"title":"Two decades with Ecography: a farewell and a new beginning","authors":"Miguel Bastos Araújo","doi":"10.1002/ecog.08375","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ecog.08375","url":null,"abstract":"<p>After two decades of service to <i>Ecography</i> – first as a subject editor, then as deputy Editor-in-Chief, and for the past twelve years as Editor-in-Chief – the time has come for me to bid farewell. My connection with the journal stretches even further back: <i>Ecography</i> was one of the first outlets where I published work from my PhD. At that time, manuscripts were submitted by printing multiple copies and sending them by post to Linus Svensson, who for several decades loyally served the Nordic Society Oikos – the society that publishes <i>Ecography</i> – before his recent retirement. From the editorial office, Linus would then mail the manuscripts to reviewers together with a request to review the paper. Since reviewers could decline, the process could take several months just to manage submissions, and it was not unusual for a paper to take several years from submission to publication. First as an author, and later as an editor, I strongly advocated for reform, and as digitisation advanced, we finally arrived at the streamlined submission process we use today.</p><p><i>Ecography</i> is a truly special society journal. It has traditionally had a strong focus on biogeography and macroecology, yet it distinguishes itself from similarly profiled journals by its openness to other fields of ecology with a strong spatial or temporal component. When I took over the Editor-in-Chief role, I was determined to maintain this broad scope already pursued by my predecessor, Carsten Rahbek, while also pursuing carefully targeted expansions into related fields, such as ecological epidemiology and experimental macroecology. The urgency of including ecological epidemiology became especially evident during the COVID-19 pandemic. We achieved this goal by appointing editors with expertise in these areas and by preparing special issues dedicated to these themes (Guégan et al. <span>2024</span>, whole special issue here: https://nsojournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/toc/16000587/2024/2024/1).</p><p>The journal itself has undergone significant transformation. Founded in 1978 as <i>Holarctic Ecology</i> under the editorship of Rolf Vik (University of Oslo, Norway), it was restructured in 1992 to become <i>Ecography</i>, subsequently led by a distinguished line of Editors-in-Chief: Nils Malmer (1992–1993, Lund University, Sweden), Sven Jonasson (1993–1996, University of Copenhagen, Denmark), Esa Ranta (1996–2002, University of Helsinki, Finland), Martin Zobel (2002–2005, University of Tartu, Estonia), and Carsten Rahbek (2005–2013, University of Copenhagen, Denmark).</p><p>Today, <i>Ecography</i> is firmly established as a leading outlet in ecology and biogeography. Along the way, it has developed several distinctive sections that set it apart from other journals: Forum papers, which present short and challenging contributions at the forefront of ecology and biogeography, often multidisciplinary and conceptually innovative; Review and Synthesis papers, which prov","PeriodicalId":51026,"journal":{"name":"Ecography","volume":"2025 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://nsojournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ecog.08375","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145153942","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Juan Pablo Ramírez-Delgado, Moreno Di Marco, Chris J. Johnson, James E. M. Watson, Hawthorne L. Beyer, Luizmar de Assis Barros, Rajeev Pillay, Oscar Venter
The effects of habitat condition on biodiversity have primarily been investigated using discrete (patch-matrix) habitat models, which consider habitat fragments as islands embedded in an inhospitable matrix. Recently, continuum habitat models, which focus on ecological gradients without defining habitat or matrix, have emerged. However, no formal comparison between patch-matrix, continuum, and hybrid habitat models (which combine characteristics of both) has been undertaken globally. Here, we compared the ability of patch-matrix, continuum, and hybrid models of habitat intactness to explain the risk of extinction for terrestrial mammals on a global scale. We found that hybrid models consistently outperform both patch-matrix and continuum models of habitat intactness in predicting extinction risk, regardless of a species' habitat specialization. Moreover, the magnitude of the relationship between habitat intactness and extinction risk was strongest when using hybrid habitat models. Our results suggest that combining discrete habitat patches with gradients of habitat condition, influenced by the surrounding matrix, can improve extinction risk analyses and provide valuable insights for conservation efforts.
{"title":"Global comparison of habitat intactness models for predicting extinction risk in terrestrial mammals","authors":"Juan Pablo Ramírez-Delgado, Moreno Di Marco, Chris J. Johnson, James E. M. Watson, Hawthorne L. Beyer, Luizmar de Assis Barros, Rajeev Pillay, Oscar Venter","doi":"10.1002/ecog.08100","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ecog.08100","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The effects of habitat condition on biodiversity have primarily been investigated using discrete (patch-matrix) habitat models, which consider habitat fragments as islands embedded in an inhospitable matrix. Recently, continuum habitat models, which focus on ecological gradients without defining habitat or matrix, have emerged. However, no formal comparison between patch-matrix, continuum, and hybrid habitat models (which combine characteristics of both) has been undertaken globally. Here, we compared the ability of patch-matrix, continuum, and hybrid models of habitat intactness to explain the risk of extinction for terrestrial mammals on a global scale. We found that hybrid models consistently outperform both patch-matrix and continuum models of habitat intactness in predicting extinction risk, regardless of a species' habitat specialization. Moreover, the magnitude of the relationship between habitat intactness and extinction risk was strongest when using hybrid habitat models. Our results suggest that combining discrete habitat patches with gradients of habitat condition, influenced by the surrounding matrix, can improve extinction risk analyses and provide valuable insights for conservation efforts.</p>","PeriodicalId":51026,"journal":{"name":"Ecography","volume":"2025 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://nsojournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ecog.08100","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145153801","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Trevor Bak, Lucas Berio Fortini, Noah Hunt, Paul Banko, Lena Schnell, Richard J. Camp
Hawaii has experienced profound declines in native avifauna alongside the introduction of numerous bird species. While site-specific population studies are common, landscape-level analyses of avian population dynamics are rare, particularly in island ecosystems. To address this gap, we used a density surface model to create a spatio-temporal projection of population densities and distributions across the Island of Hawai‘i, spanning nearly five decades (1976–2023). We incorporated environmental covariates of habitat, precipitation, and elevation, to further refine our projections. Our analysis encompassed nine native and six non-native bird species, inhabiting a range of ecological niches. We found five out of nine native species have declined in density and range size while four were stable. For non-native species, two were stable, one was decreasing, and three were increasing in density and range size. Our landscape projections can inform management by suggesting areas critical for habitat preservation and land acquisition for conservation, identifying where range fragmentation is occurring, and pinpointing locations of multi-species declines that are likely driven by a common cause. Our study demonstrates how long-term, landscape-level monitoring and analyses can advance understanding and addressing biodiversity loss, particularly in vulnerable tropical island ecosystems.
{"title":"Quantifying landscape-level biodiversity change in an island ecosystem: a 50-year assessment of shifts in the Hawaiian avian community","authors":"Trevor Bak, Lucas Berio Fortini, Noah Hunt, Paul Banko, Lena Schnell, Richard J. Camp","doi":"10.1002/ecog.07907","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ecog.07907","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Hawaii has experienced profound declines in native avifauna alongside the introduction of numerous bird species. While site-specific population studies are common, landscape-level analyses of avian population dynamics are rare, particularly in island ecosystems. To address this gap, we used a density surface model to create a spatio-temporal projection of population densities and distributions across the Island of Hawai‘i, spanning nearly five decades (1976–2023). We incorporated environmental covariates of habitat, precipitation, and elevation, to further refine our projections. Our analysis encompassed nine native and six non-native bird species, inhabiting a range of ecological niches. We found five out of nine native species have declined in density and range size while four were stable. For non-native species, two were stable, one was decreasing, and three were increasing in density and range size. Our landscape projections can inform management by suggesting areas critical for habitat preservation and land acquisition for conservation, identifying where range fragmentation is occurring, and pinpointing locations of multi-species declines that are likely driven by a common cause. Our study demonstrates how long-term, landscape-level monitoring and analyses can advance understanding and addressing biodiversity loss, particularly in vulnerable tropical island ecosystems.</p>","PeriodicalId":51026,"journal":{"name":"Ecography","volume":"2025 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://nsojournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ecog.07907","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145153802","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Many of the world's megafaunal species went extinct during the late Quaternary, leading to dramatic reductions in community and ecosystem functioning. While the nature and severity of the extinctions are well documented on global and continental scales, less is known about local-scale impacts. We quantified the biomass and energy use of 292 pre-extinction and 360 post-extinction fossil assemblages from around the globe to determine effects on large mammal communities. Assemblage energy use was calculated from metabolic rates obtained for 562 individual species, and was compared to species richness along with indicators of taphonomy, archaeology, and biogeography, using three analytical methods: least-squares orthogonalization regression, spatial autoregression, and linear mixed effects model analysis. Globally, total biomass and energy use are greatly reduced in post-extinction assemblages. Human-accumulated assemblages are further homogenised post-extinction due to their high abundances of domesticated species. The presence of domesticates greatly altered the biomass and energy use of assemblages post-extinction, producing strong energetic variation across continents that differs considerably to pre-extinction patterns. This fundamental anthropogenic alteration of communities further exacerbated the impacts of Pleistocene extinctions, even in less severely impacted regions. The results show how human activities have altered mammalian communities for many thousands of years.
{"title":"Impacts of Pleistocene extinctions on the biomass and energy use of local mammal assemblages around the world","authors":"Benjamin E. Carter, John Alroy","doi":"10.1002/ecog.07961","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ecog.07961","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Many of the world's megafaunal species went extinct during the late Quaternary, leading to dramatic reductions in community and ecosystem functioning. While the nature and severity of the extinctions are well documented on global and continental scales, less is known about local-scale impacts. We quantified the biomass and energy use of 292 pre-extinction and 360 post-extinction fossil assemblages from around the globe to determine effects on large mammal communities. Assemblage energy use was calculated from metabolic rates obtained for 562 individual species, and was compared to species richness along with indicators of taphonomy, archaeology, and biogeography, using three analytical methods: least-squares orthogonalization regression, spatial autoregression, and linear mixed effects model analysis. Globally, total biomass and energy use are greatly reduced in post-extinction assemblages. Human-accumulated assemblages are further homogenised post-extinction due to their high abundances of domesticated species. The presence of domesticates greatly altered the biomass and energy use of assemblages post-extinction, producing strong energetic variation across continents that differs considerably to pre-extinction patterns. This fundamental anthropogenic alteration of communities further exacerbated the impacts of Pleistocene extinctions, even in less severely impacted regions. The results show how human activities have altered mammalian communities for many thousands of years.</p>","PeriodicalId":51026,"journal":{"name":"Ecography","volume":"2025 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://nsojournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ecog.07961","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145141182","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}