Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), affecting 5% of global children, presents inattention, hyperactivity, and impulsivity. Sleep problems, prevalent in 70% of cases, exacerbate long-term psychosocial challenges.
This study aimed to assess the efficacy of behavioral sleep intervention in alleviating sleep problems, enhancing quality of life (QoL), and reducing ADHD symptom severity among children diagnosed with ADHD.
A randomized controlled trial was conducted from June 2022 to April 2023. The intervention group (n = 47) engaged in a hybrid approach, participating in both face-to-face and Zoom sessions, while the control group (n = 45) received standard care. Data collection involved administering the Children's Sleep Habits Questionnaire (CSHQ), Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL), and ADHD Rating Scale IV (ADHD-RS-IV).
Significant enhancements were observed in CSHQ (p ≤ 0.001, effect size = 1.913), PedsQL (p ≤ 0.001, effect size = 1.862), and a notable reduction in ADHD-RS-IV (p ≤ 0.001, effect size = 1.548). These findings highlight the intervention's efficacy in improving sleep quality, QoL, and reducing ADHD symptomatology.
This trial contributes substantially to understanding behavioral sleep interventions' impact on ADHD-affected children, enhancing quality of life and ADHD symptomatology. The study highlights the importance of individualized care for optimal outcomes in children with ADHD.
The study's findings underscore the potential for integrating behavioral sleep interventions into routine nursing practices, offering a valuable approach to address sleep-related challenges in children with ADHD. By focusing on sleep improvement, nurses can contribute to enhancing overall well-being and emotional regulation in these children within the context of comprehensive healthcare.
The World Health Organization defines quality of care as providing effective, evidence-based care, and avoiding harm. Low-value care provides little or no benefit to the patient, causes harm, and wastes limited resources. In 2017, shortly after the start of the International Choosing Wisely campaign, the first Dutch nursing “Do-not-do” list was published and has become a widely used practical tool for nurses working in daily practice. However, over the last years new guidelines are published. Therefore, an update of the list is necessary with an addition of high-value care recommendations as alternative care practices for low-value care.
In this study, a combination of designs was used. First, we searched Dutch clinical practice guidelines for low-value or high-value care recommendations. All nursing care recommendations were assessed and specified to several healthcare sectors, including hospital care, district care, nursing home care, disability care, and mental health care. Second, a prioritization among nurses regarding low-value care recommendations was done by a cross-sectional survey for each healthcare sector.
In total, 66 low-value care recommendations were found, for example, “avoid unnecessary layers under the patient at risk of pressure ulcers” and “never flush the bladder to prevent urinary tract infection.” Furthermore, 414 high-value care recommendations were selected, such as “use the Barthel Index to assess and to evaluate the degree of ADL independence” and “application of cold therapy may be considered for oncological patients with pain.” In total, 539 nurses from all healthcare sectors prioritized the low-value care recommendations, resulting in a top five low-value care practices per healthcare sector. The top five low-value care recommendations differed per healthcare sector, although “do not use physical restraints in case of a delirium” was prioritized by four out of five sectors.
Assessing low-value and high-value care recommendations for nurses will help and inspire nurses to deliver fundamental care for their patients. These initiatives regarding low-value and high-value care are essential to generate a culture of continuous quality improvement based on evidence. This is also essential to meeting the current challenges of the healthcare delivery system.
Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is a common adverse event after general surgery. This study aimed to examine the effectiveness and safety of transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation (TEAS) for the prevention of nausea and vomiting after laparoscopic surgery.
The Cochrane Library, Pubmed, Embase, and Web of Science databases were accessed from inception to 23 January 2024. The incidence of PONV was the primary outcome measure. The required information size (RIS) of each outcome was estimated by Trial sequential analysis (TSA). The RoB 2.0 tool was used to assess the risk of bias and GRADE to assess the quality of evidence.
Seventeen RCTs including 3698 participants were included. In comparison to the control group, TEAS reduced the incidence of PONV (13 trials, n = 3310; RR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.46–0.67; I2 = 64%; p < 0.01; RIS = 1100), with the level of evidence graded as low. TEAS reduced the incidence of PON (9 trials, n = 2762; RR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.52–0.79; I2 = 57%, p < 0.01; RIS = 1595), and was also associated with a lower incidence of POV (9 trials, n = 2797; RR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.45–0.63; I2 = 0%, p < 0.01; RIS = 773).
The current meta-analysis and TSA provide reliable evidence that TEAS is an effective and safe method to prevent PONV. It may reduce the workload of nursing professionals, alleviate emotional stress, and decrease exposure risk. Adverse events related to TEAS were mild.
Nurses can incorporate TEAS into the rehabilitation nursing of patients experiencing PONV.
Pain is a frequent post-stroke health concern, and several non-pharmacological interventions are commonly employed to manage it. However, few reviews have examined the effectiveness of such interventions, making it difficult to draw conclusions about their usefulness. Furthermore, subgroup analysis based on post-stroke pain level or intervention characteristics is rarely performed. This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of non-pharmacological interventions and evaluate the significant factors associated with post-stroke pain through subgroup analysis.
Systematic review and meta-analysis.
Relevant studies were obtained from seven databases, from their commencement up to March 2024, as well as from the gray literature. The PICOS approach was used to evaluate the eligibility criteria of the studies. The RoB-2 tool was used to determine the risk of bias in each randomized trial. Pooled estimations of standardized mean difference and heterogeneity (quantified with I2) were obtained using a random-effects model. The stability of the pooled result was then assessed using the leave-one-out approach. STATA 17.0 was used to run the meta-analysis.
Non-pharmacological interventions were effective in reducing pain immediately after intervention (pooled SMDs: −0.79; 95% confidence interval [CI]: −1.06 to −0.53; p < 0.001). The approach involving acupuncture, aquatic therapy, or laser therapy and rehabilitation training was effective for post-stroke hemiplegic shoulder pain. A pooled analysis of non-pharmacological interventions showed that both less than 4 weeks and more than 4 weeks of interventions were effective in alleviating pain in stroke patients.
Non-pharmacological approaches appear to be beneficial for reducing post-stroke pain. The outcomes based on the modalities merit further research.
Further studies are needed to determine the effects of different modalities on pain intensity following a stroke. Furthermore, to avoid overestimation of intervention efficacy, future randomized trials should consider blinding approaches to the interventions delivered.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：