Pub Date : 2024-10-01Epub Date: 2023-06-26DOI: 10.1177/08258597231184798
Lu Pan, Li Qiao, Yuzhe Zhang, Jianwei Zhang, Ling Yuan
Objectives: To date, there is a lack of consensus on the timely implementation of palliative care (PC) in patients with chronic heart failure (HF). We aimed to investigate the impact of primary PC intervention on chronic HF patients with different classes of cardiac function, and to determine a proper time point for the implementation of primary PC intervention. Methods: A consecutive series of 180 chronic HF patients with the New York Heart Association (NYHA) Cardiac function ranging from I to III were enrolled in this study. Patients with the same cardiac function class, they were randomized and equally assigned to the usual care (UC) group or to the PC intervention group. At the end of 24-week treatment, quality-of-life (QoL) measurements were evaluated. Left ventricular ejection fraction and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide were measured for each group at baseline and the final follow-up, respectively. Results: Through the 6-month follow-up, patients randomized to the PC intervention group presented significantly better QoL and cardiac function as compared with patients randomized to the UC group alone. Subgroup analysis showed that for patients with NYHA class II or III, significantly improved cardiac function and QoL were observed in the PC intervention group as compared with the control group. As for patients with class I, no significant difference was found between the 2 groups. Conclusions: Palliative program can effectively improve the QoL and cardiac function of patients with chronic HF. Moreover, we provided evidence on timely referral of patients to PC intervention, which could be beneficial for patients with NYHA class II.
目的:迄今为止,对慢性心力衰竭(HF)患者及时实施姑息治疗(PC)尚未达成共识。我们旨在研究初级 PC 干预对不同心功能级别的慢性心力衰竭患者的影响,并确定实施初级 PC 干预的适当时间点。研究方法本研究连续纳入了 180 名纽约心脏协会(NYHA)心功能 I 至 III 级的慢性高血压患者。心功能分级相同的患者被随机平均分配到常规护理(UC)组或PC干预组。在为期 24 周的治疗结束后,对患者的生活质量(QoL)进行了评估。每组分别在基线和最后随访时测量左心室射血分数和 N 端前 B 型钠尿肽。结果在 6 个月的随访中,随机加入 PC 干预组的患者的 QoL 和心脏功能明显优于随机加入 UC 组的患者。分组分析显示,与对照组相比,PC 干预组 NYHA 分级为 II 或 III 的患者的心功能和 QoL 有明显改善。至于 I 级患者,两组之间没有发现明显差异。结论姑息治疗方案能有效改善慢性高血压患者的生活质量和心脏功能。此外,我们还提供了及时将患者转诊至 PC 干预的证据,这对 NYHA 分级为 II 的患者有益。
{"title":"Effectiveness of Timely Implementation of Palliative Care on the Well-Being of Patients With Chronic Heart Failure: A Randomized Case-Control Study.","authors":"Lu Pan, Li Qiao, Yuzhe Zhang, Jianwei Zhang, Ling Yuan","doi":"10.1177/08258597231184798","DOIUrl":"10.1177/08258597231184798","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objectives:</b> To date, there is a lack of consensus on the timely implementation of palliative care (PC) in patients with chronic heart failure (HF). We aimed to investigate the impact of primary PC intervention on chronic HF patients with different classes of cardiac function, and to determine a proper time point for the implementation of primary PC intervention. <b>Methods:</b> A consecutive series of 180 chronic HF patients with the New York Heart Association (NYHA) Cardiac function ranging from I to III were enrolled in this study. Patients with the same cardiac function class, they were randomized and equally assigned to the usual care (UC) group or to the PC intervention group. At the end of 24-week treatment, quality-of-life (QoL) measurements were evaluated. Left ventricular ejection fraction and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide were measured for each group at baseline and the final follow-up, respectively. <b>Results:</b> Through the 6-month follow-up, patients randomized to the PC intervention group presented significantly better QoL and cardiac function as compared with patients randomized to the UC group alone. Subgroup analysis showed that for patients with NYHA class II or III, significantly improved cardiac function and QoL were observed in the PC intervention group as compared with the control group. As for patients with class I, no significant difference was found between the 2 groups. <b>Conclusions:</b> Palliative program can effectively improve the QoL and cardiac function of patients with chronic HF. Moreover, we provided evidence on timely referral of patients to PC intervention, which could be beneficial for patients with NYHA class II.</p>","PeriodicalId":51096,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Palliative Care","volume":" ","pages":"282-288"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10602709","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-01Epub Date: 2021-04-05DOI: 10.1177/08258597211002308
Charles L Sprung, Ann L Jennerich, Gavin M Joynt, Andrej Michalsen, J Randall Curtis, Linda S Efferen, Sara Leonard, Barbara Metnitz, Adam Mikstacki, Namrata Patil, Robert C McDermid, Philipp Metnitz, Richard A Mularski, Pierre Bulpa, Alexander Avidan
Objective: To evaluate the association between provider religion and religiosity and consensus about end-of-life care and explore if geographical and institutional factors contribute to variability in practice.
Methods: Using a modified Delphi method 22 end-of-life issues consisting of 35 definitions and 46 statements were evaluated in 32 countries in North America, South America, Eastern Europe, Western Europe, Asia, Australia and South Africa. A multidisciplinary, expert group from specialties treating patients at the end-of-life within each participating institution assessed the association between 7 key statements and geography, religion, religiosity and institutional factors likely influencing the development of consensus.
Results: Of 3049 participants, 1366 (45%) responded. Mean age of respondents was 45 ± 9 years and 55% were females. Following 2 Delphi rounds, consensus was obtained for 77 (95%) of 81 definitions and statements. There was a significant difference in responses across geographical regions. South African and North American respondents were more likely to encourage patients to write advance directives. Fewer Eastern European and Asian respondents agreed with withdrawing life-sustaining treatments without consent of patients or surrogates. While respondent's religion, years in practice or institution did not affect their agreement, religiosity, physician specialty and responsibility for end-of-life decisions did.
Conclusions: Variability in agreement with key consensus statements about end-of-life care is related primarily to differences among providers, with provider-level variations related to differences in religiosity and specialty. Geography also plays a role in influencing some end-of-life practices. This information may help understanding ethical dilemmas and developing culturally sensitive end-of-life care strategies.
{"title":"The Influence of Geography, Religion, Religiosity and Institutional Factors on Worldwide End-of-Life Care for the Critically Ill: The WELPICUS Study.","authors":"Charles L Sprung, Ann L Jennerich, Gavin M Joynt, Andrej Michalsen, J Randall Curtis, Linda S Efferen, Sara Leonard, Barbara Metnitz, Adam Mikstacki, Namrata Patil, Robert C McDermid, Philipp Metnitz, Richard A Mularski, Pierre Bulpa, Alexander Avidan","doi":"10.1177/08258597211002308","DOIUrl":"10.1177/08258597211002308","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the association between provider religion and religiosity and consensus about end-of-life care and explore if geographical and institutional factors contribute to variability in practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a modified Delphi method 22 end-of-life issues consisting of 35 definitions and 46 statements were evaluated in 32 countries in North America, South America, Eastern Europe, Western Europe, Asia, Australia and South Africa. A multidisciplinary, expert group from specialties treating patients at the end-of-life within each participating institution assessed the association between 7 key statements and geography, religion, religiosity and institutional factors likely influencing the development of consensus.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 3049 participants, 1366 (45%) responded. Mean age of respondents was 45 ± 9 years and 55% were females. Following 2 Delphi rounds, consensus was obtained for 77 (95%) of 81 definitions and statements. There was a significant difference in responses across geographical regions. South African and North American respondents were more likely to encourage patients to write advance directives. Fewer Eastern European and Asian respondents agreed with withdrawing life-sustaining treatments without consent of patients or surrogates. While respondent's religion, years in practice or institution did not affect their agreement, religiosity, physician specialty and responsibility for end-of-life decisions did.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Variability in agreement with key consensus statements about end-of-life care is related primarily to differences among providers, with provider-level variations related to differences in religiosity and specialty. Geography also plays a role in influencing some end-of-life practices. This information may help understanding ethical dilemmas and developing culturally sensitive end-of-life care strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":51096,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Palliative Care","volume":" ","pages":"316-324"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"25560135","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-01Epub Date: 2024-05-21DOI: 10.1177/08258597241255453
Hannah Phillips, Sarah Perry, Laura A Shinkunas, Erica M Carlisle
Objectives: Many children undergo surgery or an invasive procedure during their terminal hospital admission.1 The types of procedures, patients, and the intent of the procedures has not been well defined. Understanding these details may help pediatric surgeons better determine the clinical settings in which certain procedures will not enhance palliation or survival. Methods: A retrospective single institution chart review was performed for patients age 14 days to 18 years with chronic conditions who died while inpatient from 2013-2017. Data was gathered on demographics, primary diagnosis, intubation status, palliative care involvement, duration of hospital stay, length of palliative care involvement, and total number of procedures. Negative binomial regression was used to assess association with number of procedures. Results: 132 children met inclusion criteria. Most children were White and less than one year old. The most common type of diagnosis was cardiac in nature. Children underwent an average of three procedures. 75% were intubated and 77.5% had palliative care involved. Patients who were less than one year old at death were more likely to have been intubated, had longer terminal hospital stays, and had more procedures. Those who were intubated underwent more procedures and had longer hospital stays. Those with longer palliative care involvement had fewer procedures. Conclusions: Children undergo a significant number of surgical procedures during their terminal hospitalization. This may be influenced by age, intubation status, and length of stay. Ongoing study may help refine which procedures may have limited impact on survival in the chronically ill pediatric population.
{"title":"Procedural Interventions for Terminally Ill Children - Are We Aiding Palliation?","authors":"Hannah Phillips, Sarah Perry, Laura A Shinkunas, Erica M Carlisle","doi":"10.1177/08258597241255453","DOIUrl":"10.1177/08258597241255453","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objectives:</b> Many children undergo surgery or an invasive procedure during their terminal hospital admission.<sup>1</sup> The types of procedures, patients, and the intent of the procedures has not been well defined. Understanding these details may help pediatric surgeons better determine the clinical settings in which certain procedures will not enhance palliation or survival. <b>Methods:</b> A retrospective single institution chart review was performed for patients age 14 days to 18 years with chronic conditions who died while inpatient from 2013-2017. Data was gathered on demographics, primary diagnosis, intubation status, palliative care involvement, duration of hospital stay, length of palliative care involvement, and total number of procedures. Negative binomial regression was used to assess association with number of procedures. <b>Results:</b> 132 children met inclusion criteria. Most children were White and less than one year old. The most common type of diagnosis was cardiac in nature. Children underwent an average of three procedures. 75% were intubated and 77.5% had palliative care involved. Patients who were less than one year old at death were more likely to have been intubated, had longer terminal hospital stays, and had more procedures. Those who were intubated underwent more procedures and had longer hospital stays. Those with longer palliative care involvement had fewer procedures. <b>Conclusions:</b> Children undergo a significant number of surgical procedures during their terminal hospitalization. This may be influenced by age, intubation status, and length of stay. Ongoing study may help refine which procedures may have limited impact on survival in the chronically ill pediatric population.</p>","PeriodicalId":51096,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Palliative Care","volume":" ","pages":"291-297"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141075147","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-01Epub Date: 2023-11-19DOI: 10.1177/08258597231214485
Malar Velli Segarmurthy, Richard Boon-Leong Lim, Choi Ling Yeat, Yu-Xiang Ong, Salimah Othman, Sri Wahyu Taher, Dingle Spence, Fazlina Ahmad, Richard Sullivan, William E Rosa, Nirmala Bhoo-Pathy
Objective: Palliative care is unavailable and/or inaccessible for the majority of people in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC). This study aims to determine the availability and accessibility of palliative care services in Malaysia, a middle-income country that has made good progress toward universal health coverage (UHC).
Method: Publicly available data, and databases of registered palliative care services were obtained from governmental and nongovernmental sources. Google Maps and Rome2Rio web-based applications were used to assess geographical disparities by estimating the median distance, travel time, and travel costs from every Malaysian district to the closest palliative care service.
Results: Substantial variations in availability, components, and accessibility (distance, time, and cost to access care) of palliative care services were observed. In the highly developed Central Region of Peninsular Malaysia, specialty care was available within 4 km whereas in the less-developed East Coast of Peninsular Malaysia, patients had to travel approximately 46 km. In the predominantly rural East Malaysia, basic palliative care services were 82 km away and, in some instances, where land connectivity was scarce, it took 2.5 h to access care via boat. The corresponding median travel costs were USD2 (RM9) and USD23 (RM114) in Peninsular Malaysia and East Malaysia.
Conclusion: The stark urban-rural divide in the availability and accessibility of palliative care services even in a setting that has made good progress toward UHC highlights the urgent need for decentralization of palliative care in the LMICs. This may be achieved by capacity building and task shifting in primary care and community settings.
{"title":"Mapping Palliative Care Availability and Accessibility: A First Step to Eradicating Access Deserts in the Low- and Middle-Income Settings.","authors":"Malar Velli Segarmurthy, Richard Boon-Leong Lim, Choi Ling Yeat, Yu-Xiang Ong, Salimah Othman, Sri Wahyu Taher, Dingle Spence, Fazlina Ahmad, Richard Sullivan, William E Rosa, Nirmala Bhoo-Pathy","doi":"10.1177/08258597231214485","DOIUrl":"10.1177/08258597231214485","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Palliative care is unavailable and/or inaccessible for the majority of people in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC). This study aims to determine the availability and accessibility of palliative care services in Malaysia, a middle-income country that has made good progress toward universal health coverage (UHC).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Publicly available data, and databases of registered palliative care services were obtained from governmental and nongovernmental sources. Google Maps and Rome2Rio web-based applications were used to assess geographical disparities by estimating the median distance, travel time, and travel costs from every Malaysian district to the closest palliative care service.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Substantial variations in availability, components, and accessibility (distance, time, and cost to access care) of palliative care services were observed. In the highly developed Central Region of Peninsular Malaysia, specialty care was available within 4 km whereas in the less-developed East Coast of Peninsular Malaysia, patients had to travel approximately 46 km. In the predominantly rural East Malaysia, basic palliative care services were 82 km away and, in some instances, where land connectivity was scarce, it took 2.5 h to access care via boat. The corresponding median travel costs were USD2 (RM9) and USD23 (RM114) in Peninsular Malaysia and East Malaysia.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The stark urban-rural divide in the availability and accessibility of palliative care services even in a setting that has made good progress toward UHC highlights the urgent need for decentralization of palliative care in the LMICs. This may be achieved by capacity building and task shifting in primary care and community settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":51096,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Palliative Care","volume":" ","pages":"255-263"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11102529/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138048398","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-01Epub Date: 2023-11-29DOI: 10.1177/08258597231217947
Young Woo Um, You Hwan Jo, Hee Eun Kim, Seung Hyun Kang, Dong Kwan Han, Jae Hyuk Lee, Inwon Park
Objective: The initiation of palliative care (PC) in the emergency department (ED) is effective in improving the quality of life for seriously ill patients. This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of the modified surprise question (mSQ), "Would you be surprised if this patient died in the next 30 days?" as a trigger for initiating PC in critically ill ED patients. Methods: We conducted a prospective cohort study over a 6-month period in an ED, during which 22 emergency residents answered the mSQ for critically ill ED patients (Korean Triage and Acuity Scale 1 or 2). The primary outcome was the accuracy of the positive mSQ (negative response to the mSQ) in predicting 30-day mortality, and logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the prognostic factors. Results: A total of 300 patients were enrolled, and the positive mSQ group included 118 (39.3%) patients. The 30-day mortality rate of the cohort was 10.0%. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the positive mSQ were 83.3%, 65.6%, 21.2%, and 97.3%, respectively, with a c-statistic of 0.74 and a positive likelihood ratio of 2.42. In a multivariable analysis controlling for clinically relevant variables, the odds ratio for 30-day mortality of the positive mSQ was 4.76 (95% confidence interval, 1.61-14.09; P = .005). Conclusions: The mSQ may be valuable for identifying critically ill ED patients with an increased risk of 30-day mortality. Therefore, it may be utilized as a trigger for PC consultation in the ED.
{"title":"The Prognostic Value of the Modified Surprise Question in Critically Ill Emergency Department Patients.","authors":"Young Woo Um, You Hwan Jo, Hee Eun Kim, Seung Hyun Kang, Dong Kwan Han, Jae Hyuk Lee, Inwon Park","doi":"10.1177/08258597231217947","DOIUrl":"10.1177/08258597231217947","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> The initiation of palliative care (PC) in the emergency department (ED) is effective in improving the quality of life for seriously ill patients. This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of the modified surprise question (mSQ), \"Would you be surprised if this patient died in the next 30 days?\" as a trigger for initiating PC in critically ill ED patients. <b>Methods:</b> We conducted a prospective cohort study over a 6-month period in an ED, during which 22 emergency residents answered the mSQ for critically ill ED patients (Korean Triage and Acuity Scale 1 or 2). The primary outcome was the accuracy of the positive mSQ (negative response to the mSQ) in predicting 30-day mortality, and logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the prognostic factors. <b>Results:</b> A total of 300 patients were enrolled, and the positive mSQ group included 118 (39.3%) patients. The 30-day mortality rate of the cohort was 10.0%. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the positive mSQ were 83.3%, 65.6%, 21.2%, and 97.3%, respectively, with a c-statistic of 0.74 and a positive likelihood ratio of 2.42. In a multivariable analysis controlling for clinically relevant variables, the odds ratio for 30-day mortality of the positive mSQ was 4.76 (95% confidence interval, 1.61-14.09; <i>P</i> = .005). <b>Conclusions:</b> The mSQ may be valuable for identifying critically ill ED patients with an increased risk of 30-day mortality. Therefore, it may be utilized as a trigger for PC consultation in the ED.</p>","PeriodicalId":51096,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Palliative Care","volume":" ","pages":"325-332"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138464197","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-01Epub Date: 2024-04-01DOI: 10.1177/08258597241245022
Susanna Pusa, Rebecca Baxter, Sofia Andersson, Erik K Fromme, Joanna Paladino, Anna Sandgren
Objective: The Serious Illness Care Program was developed to support goals and values discussions between seriously ill patients and their clinicians. The core competencies, that is, the essential clinical conversation skills that are described as requisite for effective serious illness conversations (SICs) in practice, have not yet been explicated. This integrative systematic review aimed to identify core competencies for SICs in the context of the Serious Illness Care Program. Methods: Articles published between January 2014 and March 2023 were identified in MEDLINE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and PubMed databases. In total, 313 records underwent title and abstract screening, and 96 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility. The articles were critically appraised using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Guidelines, and data were analyzed using thematic synthesis. Results: In total, 53 articles were included. Clinicians' core competencies for SICs were described in 3 themes: conversation resources, intrapersonal capabilities, and interpersonal capabilities. Conversation resources included using the conversation guide as a tool, together with applying appropriate communication skills to support better communication. Intrapersonal capabilities included calibrating one's own attitudes and mindset as well as confidence and self-assurance to engage in SICs. Interpersonal capabilities focused on the clinician's ability to interact with patients and family members to foster a mutually trusting relationship, including empathetic communication with attention and adherence to patient and family members views, goals, needs, and preferences. Conclusions: Clinicians need to efficiently combine conversation resources with intrapersonal and interpersonal skills to successfully conduct and interact in SICs.
目的:重症护理计划旨在支持重症患者与临床医生之间的目标和价值观讨论。核心能力,即在实践中进行有效的重病谈话(SIC)所必需的基本临床谈话技能,尚未得到阐述。本综合系统综述旨在确定重症护理计划中的 SIC 核心能力。研究方法在 MEDLINE、PsycINFO、CINAHL 和 PubMed 数据库中查找 2014 年 1 月至 2023 年 3 月间发表的文章。共对 313 条记录进行了标题和摘要筛选,并对 96 篇全文进行了资格评估。采用乔安娜-布里格斯研究所的《批判性评价指南》对文章进行了批判性评价,并采用专题综合法对数据进行了分析。结果:共纳入 53 篇文章。临床医生的 SIC 核心能力分为 3 个主题:对话资源、个人能力和人际能力。对话资源包括使用对话指南作为工具,以及应用适当的沟通技巧来支持更好的沟通。个人能力包括调整自己的态度和心态,以及参与 SIC 的信心和自信。人际交往能力侧重于临床医生与患者和家属互动的能力,以促进相互信任的关系,包括移情沟通,关注并坚持患者和家属的观点、目标、需求和偏好。结论临床医生需要有效地将谈话资源与个人和人际交往技能结合起来,以成功地开展 SIC 并进行互动。
{"title":"Core Competencies for Serious Illness Conversations: An Integrative Systematic Review.","authors":"Susanna Pusa, Rebecca Baxter, Sofia Andersson, Erik K Fromme, Joanna Paladino, Anna Sandgren","doi":"10.1177/08258597241245022","DOIUrl":"10.1177/08258597241245022","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> The Serious Illness Care Program was developed to support goals and values discussions between seriously ill patients and their clinicians. The <i>core competencies</i>, that is, the essential clinical conversation skills that are described as requisite for effective serious illness conversations (SICs) in practice, have not yet been explicated. This integrative systematic review aimed to identify core competencies for SICs in the context of the Serious Illness Care Program. <b>Methods:</b> Articles published between January 2014 and March 2023 were identified in MEDLINE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and PubMed databases. In total, 313 records underwent title and abstract screening, and 96 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility. The articles were critically appraised using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Guidelines, and data were analyzed using thematic synthesis. <b>Results:</b> In total, 53 articles were included. Clinicians' core competencies for SICs were described in 3 themes: conversation resources, intrapersonal capabilities, and interpersonal capabilities. Conversation resources included using the conversation guide as a tool, together with applying appropriate communication skills to support better communication. Intrapersonal capabilities included calibrating one's own attitudes and mindset as well as confidence and self-assurance to engage in SICs. Interpersonal capabilities focused on the clinician's ability to interact with patients and family members to foster a mutually trusting relationship, including empathetic communication with attention and adherence to patient and family members views, goals, needs, and preferences. <b>Conclusions:</b> Clinicians need to efficiently combine conversation resources with intrapersonal and interpersonal skills to successfully conduct and interact in SICs.</p>","PeriodicalId":51096,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Palliative Care","volume":" ","pages":"340-351"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11528878/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140337604","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-01Epub Date: 2024-08-23DOI: 10.1177/08258597241274163
Christine E Alvarado, Stephanie G Worrell, Aaron E Tipton, Max Coffey, Boxiang Jiang, Philip A Linden, Christopher W Towe
Objective: The American College of Surgeons recommends structured family meetings (FM) for high-risk surgical patients. We hypothesized that goals of care discussions (GOCD) in the form of an FM, multidisciplinary family meeting (MDFM), or palliative care consult (PCC) would be underutilized in imminently dying thoracic surgery patients. Methods: A retrospective chart review at a tertiary academic medical center was performed on all inpatient mortalities and discharges to hospice after any thoracic surgery operation. The utilization of GOCDs was compared between the 2 groups. Secondary outcomes were length-of-stay, comatose status and ventilator dependence during initial GOCD, and timing of code status change. Results: In total, 56 patients met inclusion criteria: 44 of 56 (78.6%) died and 12 of 56 (21.4%) were discharged to hospice. Most patients had a FM (79.5% mortality vs 100% hospice, P = .29) and few had an MDFM (25.0% mortality vs 25.0% hospice, P = 1.00). Patients discharged to hospice were more likely to have a PCC (66.7% vs 31.2%, P = .03) and less likely to be comatose (16.7% vs 59.1%, P = .009) or ventilator dependent during initial GOCD (16.7% vs 70.5%, P = .001). Among patients who died and were DNR-CC (do not resuscitate-comfort care; 37 of 44), 75.7% died the same day of code status change and 67.6% died within 48 h of initial GOCD. Discussion: Although FMs were common, MDFMs were infrequent. Patients discharged to hospice were more likely to have a PCC. Most deaths occurred shortly after initial GOCD and most code status changes occurred on day-of-death. This data suggest an opportunity to improve GOCDs in critically ill thoracic surgery patients.
{"title":"The Role of Structured Goals of Care Discussions in Critically Ill Thoracic Surgery Patients.","authors":"Christine E Alvarado, Stephanie G Worrell, Aaron E Tipton, Max Coffey, Boxiang Jiang, Philip A Linden, Christopher W Towe","doi":"10.1177/08258597241274163","DOIUrl":"10.1177/08258597241274163","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> The American College of Surgeons recommends structured family meetings (FM) for high-risk surgical patients. We hypothesized that goals of care discussions (GOCD) in the form of an FM, multidisciplinary family meeting (MDFM), or palliative care consult (PCC) would be underutilized in imminently dying thoracic surgery patients. <b>Methods:</b> A retrospective chart review at a tertiary academic medical center was performed on all inpatient mortalities and discharges to hospice after any thoracic surgery operation. The utilization of GOCDs was compared between the 2 groups. Secondary outcomes were length-of-stay, comatose status and ventilator dependence during initial GOCD, and timing of code status change. <b>Results:</b> In total, 56 patients met inclusion criteria: 44 of 56 (78.6%) died and 12 of 56 (21.4%) were discharged to hospice. Most patients had a FM (79.5% mortality vs 100% hospice, <i>P</i> = .29) and few had an MDFM (25.0% mortality vs 25.0% hospice, <i>P</i> = 1.00). Patients discharged to hospice were more likely to have a PCC (66.7% vs 31.2%, <i>P</i> = .03) and less likely to be comatose (16.7% vs 59.1%, <i>P</i> = .009) or ventilator dependent during initial GOCD (16.7% vs 70.5%, <i>P</i> = .001). Among patients who died and were DNR-CC (do not resuscitate-comfort care; 37 of 44), 75.7% died the same day of code status change and 67.6% died within 48 h of initial GOCD. <b>Discussion:</b> Although FMs were common, MDFMs were infrequent. Patients discharged to hospice were more likely to have a PCC. Most deaths occurred shortly after initial GOCD and most code status changes occurred on day-of-death. This data suggest an opportunity to improve GOCDs in critically ill thoracic surgery patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":51096,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Palliative Care","volume":" ","pages":"333-339"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142037700","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Objectives: The progressive and unpredictable course of heart failure (HF) has made the provision of palliative care (PC) services to older adults with HF a serious challenge. This study aimed to explain the barriers and facilitators of PC in older adults with HF. Methods: This qualitative study was conducted using the content analysis approach. A sample of 15 participants, including 6 patients, 2 family caregivers, and 7 healthcare team members (4 nurses, a psychiatric nurse, a nutritionist, and a PC physician) were selected by purposive sampling over 10 months (November 21, 2020 to September 1, 2021). The data were collected using semistructured in-person interviews until data saturation and analyzed with conventional qualitative content analysis. Results: The findings revealed the main category of "neglecting the provision of PC," with 4 subcategories of "weak organizational structure," "poor social support," "older adults' and healthcare teams' poor knowledge," and "limited financial resources" as the barriers of PC and the main category of "enjoying support potentials" with 3 subcategories of "the cooperation of the government, benefactors, and nongovernmental organizations," "empathy from the family and relatives," and "benefiting from the presence of healthcare workers" as PC facilitators. Conclusions: The findings of this study explained the barriers and facilitators of PC in older adults with HF. Removing the barriers and supporting the facilitators give older adults with HF better access to PC. Therefore, to expand PC centers for older adults with HF, health system officials, and policy-makers should pay attention to organizational infrastructures and remove the barriers at organizational, social, educational, and economic levels with the cooperation of governmental organizations, benefactors, and nongovernmental organizations.
目的:心力衰竭(HF)病程渐进且难以预测,这使得为患有心力衰竭的老年人提供姑息关怀(PC)服务成为一项严峻挑战。本研究旨在解释向患有心力衰竭的老年人提供姑息关怀服务的障碍和促进因素。方法:本研究采用内容分析法进行定性研究。在 10 个月的时间里(2020 年 11 月 21 日至 2021 年 9 月 1 日),通过目的性抽样选取了 15 名参与者,包括 6 名患者、2 名家庭护理人员和 7 名医疗团队成员(4 名护士、1 名精神科护士、1 名营养师和 1 名 PC 医生)。采用半结构化面谈的方式收集数据,直至数据饱和,并采用传统的定性内容分析法对数据进行分析。结果:结果显示,"忽视 PC 的提供 "是 PC 的主要障碍,包括 "组织结构薄弱"、"社会支持差"、"老年人和医疗团队知识贫乏 "和 "财政资源有限 "4 个子类别;"享受支持潜力 "是 PC 的主要促进因素,包括 "政府、受益人和非政府组织的合作"、"家庭和亲属的同情 "和 "医疗工作者的存在使其受益 "3 个子类别。结论本研究的结果解释了高血压老年人 PC 的障碍和促进因素。消除障碍和支持促进因素能让患有心房颤动的老年人更好地获得 PC。因此,为扩大高龄心房颤动患者的 PC 中心,卫生系统官员和政策制定者应重视组织基础设施建设,并与政府组织、捐赠者和非政府组织合作,消除组织、社会、教育和经济层面的障碍。
{"title":"Barriers and Facilitators of Palliative Care in Older Adults With Heart Failure: A Qualitative Content Analysis.","authors":"Farzaneh Gholami Motlagh, Monir Nobahar, Masoud Bahrami","doi":"10.1177/08258597231183316","DOIUrl":"10.1177/08258597231183316","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objectives:</b> The progressive and unpredictable course of heart failure (HF) has made the provision of palliative care (PC) services to older adults with HF a serious challenge. This study aimed to explain the barriers and facilitators of PC in older adults with HF. <b>Methods:</b> This qualitative study was conducted using the content analysis approach. A sample of 15 participants, including 6 patients, 2 family caregivers, and 7 healthcare team members (4 nurses, a psychiatric nurse, a nutritionist, and a PC physician) were selected by purposive sampling over 10 months (November 21, 2020 to September 1, 2021). The data were collected using semistructured in-person interviews until data saturation and analyzed with conventional qualitative content analysis. <b>Results:</b> The findings revealed the main category of \"neglecting the provision of PC,\" with 4 subcategories of \"weak organizational structure,\" \"poor social support,\" \"older adults' and healthcare teams' poor knowledge,\" and \"limited financial resources\" as the barriers of PC and the main category of \"enjoying support potentials\" with 3 subcategories of \"the cooperation of the government, benefactors, and nongovernmental organizations,\" \"empathy from the family and relatives,\" and \"benefiting from the presence of healthcare workers\" as PC facilitators. <b>Conclusions:</b> The findings of this study explained the barriers and facilitators of PC in older adults with HF. Removing the barriers and supporting the facilitators give older adults with HF better access to PC. Therefore, to expand PC centers for older adults with HF, health system officials, and policy-makers should pay attention to organizational infrastructures and remove the barriers at organizational, social, educational, and economic levels with the cooperation of governmental organizations, benefactors, and nongovernmental organizations.</p>","PeriodicalId":51096,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Palliative Care","volume":" ","pages":"271-281"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9693491","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-01Epub Date: 2024-08-22DOI: 10.1177/08258597241276321
Jeff Clyde G Corpuz, Aurora M Peñaflor
In a recently published paper, Baker Rogers provided significant insights into enhancing emergency preparedness in hospices. A literature review identified 26 articles focusing on various aspects of hospice emergency preparedness, organized into 6 key themes: Policies and Procedures; Testing/Training/Education; Integration and Coordination; Mitigation; Risk Assessment/Hazard and Vulnerability Analysis; and Regulations. These themes highlight the multifaceted approach required for effective disaster readiness in hospice settings. This correspondence article aims to apply these findings to the Philippine context, suggesting pathways to strengthen the resilience of hospice care during disasters.
{"title":"Emergency Preparedness in Philippine Hospices: Insights From a Global Literature Review.","authors":"Jeff Clyde G Corpuz, Aurora M Peñaflor","doi":"10.1177/08258597241276321","DOIUrl":"10.1177/08258597241276321","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In a recently published paper, Baker Rogers provided significant insights into enhancing emergency preparedness in hospices. A literature review identified 26 articles focusing on various aspects of hospice emergency preparedness, organized into 6 key themes: Policies and Procedures; Testing/Training/Education; Integration and Coordination; Mitigation; Risk Assessment/Hazard and Vulnerability Analysis; and Regulations. These themes highlight the multifaceted approach required for effective disaster readiness in hospice settings. This correspondence article aims to apply these findings to the Philippine context, suggesting pathways to strengthen the resilience of hospice care during disasters.</p>","PeriodicalId":51096,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Palliative Care","volume":" ","pages":"264-265"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142019430","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-19DOI: 10.1177/08258597241283303
Diane Wintz,Kathryn B Schaffer,Kelly Wright,Stacy L Nilsen
Objectives: Hospitalized patients may require goals of care (GOC) or Advance Health Care Planning (ACP), which can be time-consuming and emotionally tolling for providers. A nursing team specializing in code status (CODE), GOC, and ACP was developed to provide meaningful support for patients and families and decrease provider burden. Interest in CODE, GOC, ACP, and effectiveness of a nursing team to lead these conversations prompted this study. Methods: A collaborative nursing team was trained to address CODE, GOC, and ACP with patients demonstrating illness or geriatric syndrome. This team conducted 3 visits per patient on average during hospitalization using structured CODE templates to establish longer term goals and document what matters in the healthcare journey. Comprehensive narratives for ACP and GOC were included in charting, syncing the medical team, nursing, patient, and family. Consults were tracked over nine months with data reviewed retrospectively from medical charts. Descriptive analyses of cohort demographics, CODE and outcomes were completed. Results: The study group comprised 3342 patients between October 2022 and June 2023. Patients ranged in age from 18-106 years, with majority (88%) age 65 years and older. Mean length of stay (LOS) was 6.8 days with CODE documented for 91% upon admission. Of the 3166 older adults with known CODE on admission, 946 (30%) changed CODE by discharge, of which 95% were de-escalated. 83% of older patients arriving with limited CODE maintained limitations at discharge, with a small portion converting to comfort (16%). Conclusion: Employing a focused nursing team to conduct CODE, GOC, and ACP conversations may be an effective use of time and resources and result in de-escalation of resuscitation orders for patients demonstrating illness or geriatric syndrome.
{"title":"EMPOWERING END-OF-LIFE CONVERSATIONS: The Role of Specialized Nursing Teams in Facilitating Code Status Changes at Discharge.","authors":"Diane Wintz,Kathryn B Schaffer,Kelly Wright,Stacy L Nilsen","doi":"10.1177/08258597241283303","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08258597241283303","url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: Hospitalized patients may require goals of care (GOC) or Advance Health Care Planning (ACP), which can be time-consuming and emotionally tolling for providers. A nursing team specializing in code status (CODE), GOC, and ACP was developed to provide meaningful support for patients and families and decrease provider burden. Interest in CODE, GOC, ACP, and effectiveness of a nursing team to lead these conversations prompted this study. Methods: A collaborative nursing team was trained to address CODE, GOC, and ACP with patients demonstrating illness or geriatric syndrome. This team conducted 3 visits per patient on average during hospitalization using structured CODE templates to establish longer term goals and document what matters in the healthcare journey. Comprehensive narratives for ACP and GOC were included in charting, syncing the medical team, nursing, patient, and family. Consults were tracked over nine months with data reviewed retrospectively from medical charts. Descriptive analyses of cohort demographics, CODE and outcomes were completed. Results: The study group comprised 3342 patients between October 2022 and June 2023. Patients ranged in age from 18-106 years, with majority (88%) age 65 years and older. Mean length of stay (LOS) was 6.8 days with CODE documented for 91% upon admission. Of the 3166 older adults with known CODE on admission, 946 (30%) changed CODE by discharge, of which 95% were de-escalated. 83% of older patients arriving with limited CODE maintained limitations at discharge, with a small portion converting to comfort (16%). Conclusion: Employing a focused nursing team to conduct CODE, GOC, and ACP conversations may be an effective use of time and resources and result in de-escalation of resuscitation orders for patients demonstrating illness or geriatric syndrome.","PeriodicalId":51096,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Palliative Care","volume":"27 1","pages":"8258597241283303"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142262206","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}