Alan Mackelprang, Sachin B. Modi, David D. Dobrzykowski, Paul C. Hong
{"title":"Examining sharing economy operations: A process perspective","authors":"Alan Mackelprang, Sachin B. Modi, David D. Dobrzykowski, Paul C. Hong","doi":"10.1002/joom.1269","DOIUrl":"10.1002/joom.1269","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":51097,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Operations Management","volume":"69 5","pages":"706-718"},"PeriodicalIF":7.8,"publicationDate":"2023-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44905470","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The cost of medical supplies represents a significant portion of hospital spending. Hospitals manage different types of medical supplies, such as general medical supplies and physician preference items. General medical supplies tend to be numerous and relatively low cost, while physician preference items tend to be less numerous and more expensive. Strong physician preference for certain medical supplies can limit the options available to reduce inventory costs. The use of consignment inventory is one way in which hospitals seek to reduce inventory costs for both general supplies as well as physician preference items. However, the use of consignment reduces the level of oversight that hospitals have on consigned inventories, thereby potentially increasing the likelihood of shrinkage. The impact of consignment on shrinkage cost has received limited attention. We investigate this issue by drawing upon the precepts of agency theory and by analyzing hospital data that span multiple years. Our results suggest that the use of consignment increases shrinkage and spend. We develop empirically informed analytical models to better understand the impact of an unforeseen increase in shrinkage on the cost associated with general and physician preference items. The analytical investigation suggests that the impact on general and physician preference items differ depending on the type of consignment contract negotiated between a hospital and a vendor. We discuss the theoretical and managerial implications of our findings.
{"title":"Consignment inventory shrinkage in general and physician preference medical supplies: An empirically-grounded analytical investigation","authors":"Claudia Rosales, Anand Nair, Sukrit Pal","doi":"10.1002/joom.1256","DOIUrl":"10.1002/joom.1256","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The cost of medical supplies represents a significant portion of hospital spending. Hospitals manage different types of medical supplies, such as general medical supplies and physician preference items. General medical supplies tend to be numerous and relatively low cost, while physician preference items tend to be less numerous and more expensive. Strong physician preference for certain medical supplies can limit the options available to reduce inventory costs. The use of consignment inventory is one way in which hospitals seek to reduce inventory costs for both general supplies as well as physician preference items. However, the use of consignment reduces the level of oversight that hospitals have on consigned inventories, thereby potentially increasing the likelihood of shrinkage. The impact of consignment on shrinkage cost has received limited attention. We investigate this issue by drawing upon the precepts of agency theory and by analyzing hospital data that span multiple years. Our results suggest that the use of consignment increases shrinkage and spend. We develop empirically informed analytical models to better understand the impact of an unforeseen increase in shrinkage on the cost associated with general and physician preference items. The analytical investigation suggests that the impact on general and physician preference items differ depending on the type of consignment contract negotiated between a hospital and a vendor. We discuss the theoretical and managerial implications of our findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":51097,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Operations Management","volume":"69 8","pages":"1235-1256"},"PeriodicalIF":7.8,"publicationDate":"2023-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/joom.1256","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48773881","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Suzanne de Treville, Tyson R. Browning, Julian N. Marewski, Jordi Weiss
<p>Two Forum articles and an editorial in 2021 called for a rethink of how operations management (OM) scholars conceptualize the Toyota Production System (TPS) and Lean (the Western label given to certain elements of the TPS). In the lead article in that series, Hopp and Spearman (<span>2021</span>, pp. 10 and 11) observed that the evolution of Lean from a physics of flows to an organizational culture that supports “continual reduction of the cost of waste” requires us “to incorporate human behavior more scientifically.” They noted that “A more extensive, and largely untapped, resource is the wide array of cognitive research into heuristics and biases that has been developed by behavioral and decision scientists since the 1970s.” This brings to mind the description by Fujimoto (<span>1999</span>) of the TPS as a knowledge-management system, in contrast to the common understanding of the TPS (captured by the designation “Lean”) as buffer management. In this editorial, we continue the discussion started by Hopp and Spearman with a thought experiment in which we consider TPS practices as heuristics. An initial objective was to contribute to disentangling the TPS knowledge- and buffer-management roles, asking: Are buffer-management tools designed to support knowledge management, or do knowledge-management TPS tools exist to allow operations to run as lean as possible (i.e., manage buffers efficiently)? The heuristics lens revealed the mechanisms by which buffer removal can be used to create cues from the production environment that effectively inform decision making. More generally, we discovered that the exercise of interpreting TPS practices as heuristics provided insight into whether and how heuristics can contribute to an effective management of operations.</p><p>We analyzed a sample of common practices that have been observed to be used by Toyota as one approach to implementing the TPS: <i>jidoka</i>, <i>andon</i>, and <i>kanban</i>. These practices transform front-line employees into decision makers by clearly specifying the information to be considered and the decision rule to be followed in a precisely defined situation. The resulting heuristics can be described as “production” heuristics, as their objective is to contribute to the line running smoothly on a day-to-day basis. We then considered practices that Toyota has been observed to use to prepare the environment for the successful deployment of these production-heuristic practices, including, for example, respect for workers, <i>gemba</i>, <i>kaizen</i>, and “five whys”. These “exploration” heuristics are oriented toward problem solving through carving out regularities in what appears to be a chaotic landscape. Whereas the production heuristics use stopping rules to strictly limit the information to be considered and precisely define the decision rule, the exploration heuristics relax the search rules and strongly encourage the decision maker to maintain information in the decision proce
两篇论坛文章和2021年的一篇社论呼吁重新思考运营管理(OM)学者如何概念化丰田生产系统(TPS)和精益(西方给TPS某些要素的标签)。在该系列的第一篇文章中,Hopp和Spearman(2021年,第10页和第11页)指出,精益从一种流动物理到一种支持“持续降低浪费成本”的组织文化的演变要求我们“更科学地结合人类行为”。他们指出,“从20世纪70年代以来,行为和决策科学家们对启发式和偏见进行了广泛的认知研究,这是一个更广泛的、在很大程度上尚未开发的资源。”这让人想起藤本(1999)将TPS描述为一种知识管理系统,而不是将TPS(被称为“精益”)理解为缓冲管理。在这篇社论中,我们将继续Hopp和Spearman开始的讨论,通过一个思想实验,我们将TPS实践视为启发式。最初的目标是帮助理清TPS知识管理和缓冲区管理的角色,提出以下问题:缓冲区管理工具是为了支持知识管理而设计的,还是知识管理TPS工具的存在是为了允许操作尽可能精简(即有效地管理缓冲区)?启发式镜头揭示了缓冲移除可以用来从生产环境中创建线索的机制,从而有效地为决策提供信息。更一般地说,我们发现将TPS实践解释为启发式方法的练习提供了对启发式方法是否以及如何有助于有效管理运营的见解。我们分析了一个常见实践的样本,这些实践被观察到被丰田公司用作实现TPS的一种方法:jidoka、andon和看板。这些实践通过明确规定在精确定义的情况下需要考虑的信息和需要遵循的决策规则,将一线员工转变为决策者。由此产生的启发式方法可以被描述为“生产”启发式方法,因为它们的目标是使生产线在日常基础上顺利运行。然后,我们考虑了观察到丰田用来为成功部署这些生产启发式实践准备环境的实践,包括,例如,尊重工人,玄叶,改善和“五个为什么”。这些“探索”启发式是通过在看似混乱的环境中找出规律来解决问题的。生产启发式使用停止规则严格限制需要考虑的信息,精确定义决策规则,而探索启发式则放松搜索规则,强烈鼓励决策者在决策过程中保持信息。它们还允许决策过程的目标是灵活的。在生产环境中,人们可能会错误地认为信息越多越好。在探索环境中,人类可能会在信息太少的情况下做出决定。启发式可以帮助避免这两种类型的错误:我们认为TPS实践要么限制或增加要考虑的信息量,要么精确地指定或明确地拒绝指定决策的目标。与关键绩效指标相比,改善鼓励决策者思考让事情变得更好意味着什么。“五个为什么”指导决策者不断提出问题,即使他们认为自己已经知道答案。我们将介绍一些例子,其中TPS性能由于未能维护这些系统而下降,这些系统会导致探索启发式,以避免过早消除信息和灵活性。尽管传统智慧认为启发式总是显著减少使用中的信息,但我们对TPS的探索表明,启发式可能会指导决策者减少或扩大信息。TPS的成功可能部分归功于启发式的部署,这些启发式的设计目的要么是高效生产,要么是探索,探索启发式创造了一个生产启发式发挥作用的环境。Gigerenzer等人(1999)提出了一种启发式类型,首先根据理性是有界的还是无界的来划分“合理性”(理性决策)(Simon, 1955)。有限理性——本质上是所有商业决策的基础——要求决策者沿着Savage(1954)描述的小世界的路线减少所考虑的信息。在有限理性下做出的决策将其目标设定为满足(做出足够好的决策,Simon, 1956)而不是优化。 , 2011)有助于识别决策中存在的启发式,以及在特定决策环境中使这些启发式适合和表现良好的特征。当观察到使用中的启发式会产生有偏见的决策时,通过从启发式转向决策者所做的更全面的分析(即,沿着Little(1970)建议的路线向约束优化移动),通过重新校准启发式以提高其性能,还是通过在生产启发式和探索启发式之间移动来更好地实现去偏见?SIMON(1955,1956)发展了有限理性的思想,引入了满足的思想作为优化的替代方案。对于经济学家来说,Simon(1955)强调决策者的认知能力,对于心理学家来说(Simon, 1956)强调环境(参见Petracca, 2021,关于这一划分的讨论)。Simon (1990, p. 7)将这两个方面结合在一起,他写道:“人类的理性行为(以及所有物理符号系统的理性行为)是由一把剪刀塑造的,它的两个刀片是任务环境的结构和行动者的计算能力。”启发式是经验法则,通常可以分解为搜索、停止和决策规则。给定启发式的生态合理性取决于这些规则如何允许由任务环境和行动者的计算能力形成的“剪刀刃”一起操作。生产启发式通常强调搜索限制,而探索启发式可能鼓励在决策过程中保留更多信息:一个功能良好的启发式可能会根据上下文增加或减少使用中的信息。Daft和Weick(1984,第289页)将组织描述为“解释系统”,为理解启发式的搜索(环境)和停止(认知能力)维度之间的相互作用提供了有用的输入。Daft和Weick从以下方面定义了解释模式:(1)解释的目标是否为确定假设存在的正确答案,这决定了环境是否被视为“可分析的”;(2)组织与环境的关系是侵入性的还是被动的。得到的2 × 2矩阵再现于表1中。TPS于20世纪70年代末在日本兴起(例如,Sugimori et al., 1977),并迅速引起了全世界的关注。丰田克服了强大的竞争劣势(比如需要从日本运输汽车,以及用于研发的资源相当少),从通用汽车等公司手中夺取了市场份额。TPS和批量生产之间的一个关键区别在于如何调整上游生产速度以匹配生产线需要或能够处理的下游生产。考虑一个下游问题,该问题导致在制品库存累积。TPS实践旨在突出出现的问题,以便将注意力集中在解决问题上,同时将上游生产与下游产能相匹配。TPS不是设定一个目标,让员工在利用率或产量等传统绩效指标方面表现良好,而是设定一个目标,让员工在他们的直接环境中遇到生产问题,以避免库存积累,并有助于解决问题。相比之下,大规模生产是基于一项决策规则,即无论环境条件如何,都要求产量最大化。在大规模生产下,工人们被要求专注于自己的任务,而不是注意那些不能正常工作的机器。如果一个工人不能在一个周期内完成分配给他的任务,他就不得不离开工作不完整的地方,从而导致一个不符合规范的单元,而一个工人如果能够填补他们和相邻工作站之间的中间缓冲区,就被认为是一个优秀的表演者。我们在这里分析了三种TPS工具,它们被设计用来在下游需求减少时停止生产(要么是因为需求得到满足,要么是因为生产问题):jidoka(也称为“自动化”,或者人工操作的自动化)、andon和看板。Jidoka将人工干预与自动化相结合。当一台自动化机器出现问题时(例如,一个零件卡住了,没有材料了,或者没有对准),在jiidoka下,它被设计成自动停止并向附近的工人发出需要采取行动的信号。当信号发出时,工人要么解决问题,要么通知维修人员需要维修。与大规模生产的关键区别在于,工人亲自参与解决问题或沟通问题的存在,而不是忽视问题,专注于在工作站上最大化产出。 其次,这些经过精心校准的启发式方法产生了理性和有益的决策,为几十年后继续令人震惊的业绩水平做出了贡献。我们的思想实验是建立在这样一个理念之上的,即关键的TPS实践可以围绕启发式的选择、设计和校准进行概念化,以增加最终决策的生态合理性。我们上面的讨论
{"title":"Editorial: Toyota Production System practices as Fast-and-Frugal heuristics","authors":"Suzanne de Treville, Tyson R. Browning, Julian N. Marewski, Jordi Weiss","doi":"10.1002/joom.1266","DOIUrl":"10.1002/joom.1266","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Two Forum articles and an editorial in 2021 called for a rethink of how operations management (OM) scholars conceptualize the Toyota Production System (TPS) and Lean (the Western label given to certain elements of the TPS). In the lead article in that series, Hopp and Spearman (<span>2021</span>, pp. 10 and 11) observed that the evolution of Lean from a physics of flows to an organizational culture that supports “continual reduction of the cost of waste” requires us “to incorporate human behavior more scientifically.” They noted that “A more extensive, and largely untapped, resource is the wide array of cognitive research into heuristics and biases that has been developed by behavioral and decision scientists since the 1970s.” This brings to mind the description by Fujimoto (<span>1999</span>) of the TPS as a knowledge-management system, in contrast to the common understanding of the TPS (captured by the designation “Lean”) as buffer management. In this editorial, we continue the discussion started by Hopp and Spearman with a thought experiment in which we consider TPS practices as heuristics. An initial objective was to contribute to disentangling the TPS knowledge- and buffer-management roles, asking: Are buffer-management tools designed to support knowledge management, or do knowledge-management TPS tools exist to allow operations to run as lean as possible (i.e., manage buffers efficiently)? The heuristics lens revealed the mechanisms by which buffer removal can be used to create cues from the production environment that effectively inform decision making. More generally, we discovered that the exercise of interpreting TPS practices as heuristics provided insight into whether and how heuristics can contribute to an effective management of operations.</p><p>We analyzed a sample of common practices that have been observed to be used by Toyota as one approach to implementing the TPS: <i>jidoka</i>, <i>andon</i>, and <i>kanban</i>. These practices transform front-line employees into decision makers by clearly specifying the information to be considered and the decision rule to be followed in a precisely defined situation. The resulting heuristics can be described as “production” heuristics, as their objective is to contribute to the line running smoothly on a day-to-day basis. We then considered practices that Toyota has been observed to use to prepare the environment for the successful deployment of these production-heuristic practices, including, for example, respect for workers, <i>gemba</i>, <i>kaizen</i>, and “five whys”. These “exploration” heuristics are oriented toward problem solving through carving out regularities in what appears to be a chaotic landscape. Whereas the production heuristics use stopping rules to strictly limit the information to be considered and precisely define the decision rule, the exploration heuristics relax the search rules and strongly encourage the decision maker to maintain information in the decision proce","PeriodicalId":51097,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Operations Management","volume":"69 4","pages":"522-535"},"PeriodicalIF":7.8,"publicationDate":"2023-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/joom.1266","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49145661","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Our research examines how to integrate human judgment and statistical algorithms for demand planning in an increasingly data-driven and automated environment. We use a laboratory experiment combined with a field study to compare existing integration methods with a novel approach: Human-Guided Learning. This new method allows the algorithm to use human judgment to train a model using an iterative linear weighting of human judgment and model predictions. Human-Guided Learning is more accurate vis-à-vis the established integration methods of Judgmental Adjustment, Quantitative Correction of Human Judgment, Forecast Combination, and Judgment as a Model Input. Human-Guided Learning performs similarly to Integrative Judgment Learning, but under certain circumstances, Human-Guided Learning can be more accurate. Our studies demonstrate that the benefit of human judgment for demand planning processes depends on the integration method.
我们的研究探讨了在日益数据驱动和自动化的环境中,如何将人类判断和统计算法集成到需求规划中。我们使用实验室实验结合实地研究来比较现有的整合方法与一种新的方法:人类引导学习。这种新方法允许算法使用人类判断来训练模型,使用人类判断和模型预测的迭代线性加权。Human- guided Learning相对于-à-vis已建立的Judgment Adjustment、Quantitative Correction of Human judgement、Forecast Combination、judgement as a Model Input的整合方法,更加准确。人工指导学习与综合判断学习类似,但在某些情况下,人工指导学习可以更准确。我们的研究表明,在需求规划过程中,人类判断的效益取决于集成方法。
{"title":"Demand planning for the digital supply chain: How to integrate human judgment and predictive analytics","authors":"Rebekah Brau, John Aloysius, Enno Siemsen","doi":"10.1002/joom.1257","DOIUrl":"10.1002/joom.1257","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Our research examines how to integrate human judgment and statistical algorithms for demand planning in an increasingly data-driven and automated environment. We use a laboratory experiment combined with a field study to compare existing integration methods with a novel approach: Human-Guided Learning. This new method allows the algorithm to use human judgment to train a model using an iterative linear weighting of human judgment and model predictions. Human-Guided Learning is more accurate vis-à-vis the established integration methods of Judgmental Adjustment, Quantitative Correction of Human Judgment, Forecast Combination, and Judgment as a Model Input. Human-Guided Learning performs similarly to Integrative Judgment Learning, but under certain circumstances, Human-Guided Learning can be more accurate. Our studies demonstrate that the benefit of human judgment for demand planning processes depends on the integration method.</p>","PeriodicalId":51097,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Operations Management","volume":"69 6","pages":"965-982"},"PeriodicalIF":7.8,"publicationDate":"2023-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/joom.1257","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47127852","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Saman Lagzi, Bernardo F. Quiroga, Gonzalo Romero, Nicholas Howard, Timothy C. Y. Chan
We study the potential negative impact of imbalanced compensation schemes on firm performance. We analyze data from a radiology workflow platform that connects off-site radiologists with hospitals. These radiologists select tasks from a common pool, while service level is defined by priority-specific turnaround time targets. However, imbalances between pay and workload of different tasks could result in higher priority tasks with low pay-to-workload ratio receiving poorer service. We investigate this hypothesis, showing turnaround time is decreasing in pay-to-workload for lower priority tasks, whereas it is increasing in workload for high-priority tasks. Crucially, we find evidence of an externality effect: Having many economically attractive tasks with low priority can lead to longer turnaround times for higher priority tasks, increasing their likelihood of delay, thus partially defeating the purpose of the priority classes.
{"title":"Negative externality on service level across priority classes: Evidence from a radiology workflow platform","authors":"Saman Lagzi, Bernardo F. Quiroga, Gonzalo Romero, Nicholas Howard, Timothy C. Y. Chan","doi":"10.1002/joom.1252","DOIUrl":"10.1002/joom.1252","url":null,"abstract":"<p>We study the potential negative impact of imbalanced compensation schemes on firm performance. We analyze data from a radiology workflow platform that connects off-site radiologists with hospitals. These radiologists select tasks from a common pool, while service level is defined by priority-specific turnaround time targets. However, imbalances between pay and workload of different tasks could result in higher priority tasks with low pay-to-workload ratio receiving poorer service. We investigate this hypothesis, showing turnaround time is decreasing in pay-to-workload for lower priority tasks, whereas it is increasing in workload for high-priority tasks. Crucially, we find evidence of an externality effect: Having many economically attractive tasks with low priority can lead to longer turnaround times for higher priority tasks, increasing their likelihood of delay, thus partially defeating the purpose of the priority classes.</p>","PeriodicalId":51097,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Operations Management","volume":"69 8","pages":"1257-1281"},"PeriodicalIF":7.8,"publicationDate":"2023-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/joom.1252","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48087523","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Aydin Alptekinoglu, Ashley Stadler Blank, Margaret G. Meloy, V. Daniel R. Guide Jr.
We experimentally investigate whether mass customization enhances sustainability and firm outcomes in a fast fashion context. Fast fashion delivers fashion trends to consumers quickly and cheaply but has detrimental effects on the environment (e.g., waste accumulation, water pollution). To mitigate these harmful effects, we examine how different points of customer involvement in mass customization affect the anticipated number of months to product disposal and willingness-to-pay for mass-customized products. We employ a series of experiments and find that consumer perceptions of the degree of customization increase as the point of customer involvement shifts upstream from Use to Assembly to Fabrication to Design and that the anticipated number of months to disposal and willingness-to-pay increase as the point of customer involvement shifts upstream to Design. We also find that the implementation of customer involvement in mass customization matters. Overall, these results provide evidence that mass customization via Design may not only help slow fast fashion down, which has major sustainability implications, but it may also present a win-win opportunity for both the environment and firms (in terms of the bottom line—provided, of course, that it does not have any major cost disadvantages).
{"title":"Can mass customization slow fast fashion down? The impact on time-to-disposal and willingness-to-pay","authors":"Aydin Alptekinoglu, Ashley Stadler Blank, Margaret G. Meloy, V. Daniel R. Guide Jr.","doi":"10.1002/joom.1255","DOIUrl":"10.1002/joom.1255","url":null,"abstract":"<p>We experimentally investigate whether mass customization enhances sustainability and firm outcomes in a fast fashion context. Fast fashion delivers fashion trends to consumers quickly and cheaply but has detrimental effects on the environment (e.g., waste accumulation, water pollution). To mitigate these harmful effects, we examine how different points of customer involvement in mass customization affect the anticipated number of months to product disposal and willingness-to-pay for mass-customized products. We employ a series of experiments and find that consumer perceptions of the degree of customization increase as the point of customer involvement shifts upstream from <i>Use</i> to <i>Assembly</i> to <i>Fabrication</i> to <i>Design</i> and that the anticipated number of months to disposal and willingness-to-pay increase as the point of customer involvement shifts upstream to <i>Design</i>. We also find that the implementation of customer involvement in mass customization matters. Overall, these results provide evidence that mass customization via <i>Design</i> may not only help <i>slow</i> fast fashion down, which has major sustainability implications, but it may also present a win-win opportunity for both the environment <i>and</i> firms (in terms of the bottom line—provided, of course, that it does not have any major cost disadvantages).</p>","PeriodicalId":51097,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Operations Management","volume":"69 8","pages":"1320-1341"},"PeriodicalIF":7.8,"publicationDate":"2023-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49293774","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Recent past has witnessed a great proliferation of sharing economy platforms with great successes, but also many failures on their journey toward institutionalization, that is, their establishment and acceptance in society. To develop insight on factors contributing to this institutionalization process, this paper relies on the literature in institutional entrepreneurship and investigates sharing economy platforms in China, highlighting institutional voids that are encountered, and suggesting ways on how they can be overcome. These insights are derived through a multiple case study approach involving 61 semi-structured interviews with managers from eight sharing economy platforms (DiDi, Uber China, Huochebang, Yunmanman, OfO, Mobike, Evcard, and Zhida) across four sharing economy industries in China (ride-sharing, logistics-sharing, bike-sharing, and car-sharing). The findings highlight the importance of exchange and collaboration with stakeholders (allies) in the network, as well as the effective response to emerging issues through the adaptation of the business models. In addition, mergers and acquisitions, and the role of government are identified as critical components in aiding platforms in their progression toward institutionalization. Further cognitive, regulative, and normative factors are found to represent valuable institutional pillars that serve as a fertile foundation throughout the institutionalization process. Overall, the findings provide an intriguing insight into the journey of Chinese sharing economy platforms toward institutionalization.
{"title":"The institutionalization of sharing economy platforms in China","authors":"Dun Li, Tobias Schoenherr","doi":"10.1002/joom.1253","DOIUrl":"10.1002/joom.1253","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Recent past has witnessed a great proliferation of sharing economy platforms with great successes, but also many failures on their journey toward institutionalization, that is, their establishment and acceptance in society. To develop insight on factors contributing to this institutionalization process, this paper relies on the literature in institutional entrepreneurship and investigates sharing economy platforms in China, highlighting institutional voids that are encountered, and suggesting ways on how they can be overcome. These insights are derived through a multiple case study approach involving 61 semi-structured interviews with managers from eight sharing economy platforms (DiDi, Uber China, Huochebang, Yunmanman, OfO, Mobike, Evcard, and Zhida) across four sharing economy industries in China (ride-sharing, logistics-sharing, bike-sharing, and car-sharing). The findings highlight the importance of exchange and collaboration with stakeholders (allies) in the network, as well as the effective response to emerging issues through the adaptation of the business models. In addition, mergers and acquisitions, and the role of government are identified as critical components in aiding platforms in their progression toward institutionalization. Further cognitive, regulative, and normative factors are found to represent valuable institutional pillars that serve as a fertile foundation throughout the institutionalization process. Overall, the findings provide an intriguing insight into the journey of Chinese sharing economy platforms toward institutionalization.</p>","PeriodicalId":51097,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Operations Management","volume":"69 5","pages":"764-793"},"PeriodicalIF":7.8,"publicationDate":"2023-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47693313","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
In a service exchange setting, the supply management literature generally assumes, with notable exceptions, the availability of complete information regarding supplier reliability. Highlighting the information asymmetry in supplier evaluation and using signaling theory, we argue that for a focal buyer, a supplier's downstream ego-network instability, that is, other buyers' turnover in a supplier's network from one period to the next, acts as a signal of supplier unreliability, thereby reducing the price that the buyer pays to the supplier in a service exchange. Furthermore, we suggest that focal buyer–supplier relationship strength and structural equivalence weaken the negative effect of instability because the buyer has a more direct and positive experience with the supplier. Using a dataset of 3263 unique dyads formed by 260 buyers (shipoperators) and 493 suppliers (shipowners) during the 2000–2018 period in the container shipping charter market, we find support for our hypotheses, except for the contingent effect of structural equivalence. Our study contributes to signaling literature and network research by developing a supplier's downstream ego-network instability as a salient heuristic for a focal buyer's pricing decisions. These findings equip buyer managers who may not accurately foresee supplier service quality in the charter market with a new supplier evaluation tool: a supplier's downstream ego-network instability.
{"title":"The signaling effect of supplier's customer network instability on service price: Insights from the container shipping charter market","authors":"Pankaj Kumar, Agnieszka Nowinska, Hans-Joachim Schramm","doi":"10.1002/joom.1254","DOIUrl":"10.1002/joom.1254","url":null,"abstract":"<p>In a service exchange setting, the supply management literature generally assumes, with notable exceptions, the availability of complete information regarding supplier reliability. Highlighting the information asymmetry in supplier evaluation and using signaling theory, we argue that for a focal buyer, a supplier's downstream ego-network instability, that is, other buyers' turnover in a supplier's network from one period to the next, acts as a <i>signal</i> of supplier unreliability, thereby reducing the price that the buyer pays to the supplier in a service exchange. Furthermore, we suggest that focal buyer–supplier relationship strength and structural equivalence weaken the negative effect of instability because the buyer has a more direct and positive experience with the supplier. Using a dataset of 3263 unique dyads formed by 260 buyers (shipoperators) and 493 suppliers (shipowners) during the 2000–2018 period in the container shipping charter market, we find support for our hypotheses, except for the contingent effect of structural equivalence. Our study contributes to signaling literature and network research by developing a supplier's downstream ego-network instability as a salient heuristic for a focal buyer's pricing decisions. These findings equip buyer managers who may not accurately foresee supplier service quality in the charter market with a new supplier evaluation tool: a supplier's downstream ego-network instability.</p>","PeriodicalId":51097,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Operations Management","volume":"69 8","pages":"1282-1319"},"PeriodicalIF":7.8,"publicationDate":"2023-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/joom.1254","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46627520","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
<p>Since the first case was identified, COVID-19 has spread to more than 200 countries. As of October 25, 2022, it had resulted in over 6 million deaths and 600 million confirmed cases. The rapid widespread of COVID-19 led to large-scale disruptions with major supply and demand shocks in supply chains, causing significant negative impacts on the global economy. The World Bank reported that the world GDP growth rate for 2020 was −3.27%, indicating the worst recession since 1961.</p><p>First, the initial epidemic-control efforts blocked the flows of raw materials across the world, and limited labor movements by imposing temporary travel restrictions. As a result, many firms struggled with supply disruptions and labor shortages, setting off a chain reaction of disruption in global supply chains. Fortune (2020) reported that as of February 21, 2020, 94% of the <i>Fortune 1000</i> companies had experienced supply-chain disruptions due to COVID-19.<sup>1</sup> According to the <i>Institute for Supply Management</i>, almost 75% of companies reported supply-chain disruptions in some capacity due to coronavirus-related transportation restrictions.<sup>2</sup> A survey conducted by the <i>National Association of Manufacturers</i> reported that 78.3% of manufacturers believed that COVID-19 had a significant negative influence on their financial performance, and 35.5% of them had experienced some type of supply chain disruptions.<sup>3</sup></p><p>Second, the demand for essential personal-protective equipment increased dramatically because the virus was easily transmitted from person to person through air-borne droplets; accompanied by a drop in the need for other manufactured products (Nicola et al., <span>2020</span>). For example, COVID-19 had caused a surge in the demand of face masks that were necessary to prevent infection among frontline workers (who were directly exposed to the virus when treating infected patients or conducting nucleic acid tests) and individuals in public places. China was the main producer of masks at the start of the crisis, accounting for approximately half of world production. In January 2020, China could produce 20 million masks per day, which was insufficient to equip even just healthcare workers in China. As a result of extensive efforts by the government and companies, Chinese production increased six-fold and reached 116 million masks per day by the end of February, 2020. But even this was insufficient to meet its own demand, and China imported a large quantity of masks. Similarly, Germany also experienced very limited availability of face masks in the spring of 2020. To increase the supply of face masks, the German government contracted with hundreds of companies and introduced a series of incentives to encourage local, non-medical manufacturers to temporarily transform to produce masks.</p><p>More generally, demand patterns for supplies of all types became less predictable from the beginning of pandemic. Significant chan
例如,比亚迪、富士康、保乐力加和鲍尔将生产转向口罩/盾牌),以及采用数字技术(例如,京东物流、新哈维)。这种对2R的强调与通常对降低成本的强调有很大不同(Caunhye et al., 2016)。我们观察到一些公司在快速应对需求和供应变化以及灵活应对中断方面表现良好,我们寻求学习那些在应对这种大规模中断方面取得成功的创新做法和经验。在选择供应商和管理供应商/客户关系、设计全球供应网络以及采用新的数字技术和大数据分析方面,我们吸取了哪些关键教训?新冠肺炎疫情对全球供应链结构和主要供应链参与者的战略定位有何长期影响?本期特刊着重于揭示这些创新实践的关键成功因素和经验教训。我们的目标是更深入地了解采用技术创新、商业模式创新、协作机制创新和运营改进/优化方法如何帮助公司增强供应链中的2r。为了构建本期特刊,我们定义了一些关键概念,并简要回顾了一些发表在主要运营管理期刊上的关于供应链响应能力、供应链弹性、供应链集成和大数据分析的文献。经过征稿、114篇稿件的提交以及审查和修订过程,本期特刊选择了7篇文章,有助于我们了解COVID-19对供应链的影响及其对解决2r问题的影响。在《2019冠状病毒病期间加强供应链弹性:以京东为例》(Shen &Sun, 2023),作者使用从京东获得的定量操作数据4来分析大流行对供应链弹性的影响。他们描述了中国零售供应链经历的具有挑战性的情景,以及京东在疫情期间的实际反应。根据观察,京东基于其高度集成的供应链结构(包括流程和活动集成以及技术和系统集成)和全面的数字技术,能够很好地应对新冠肺炎在中国造成的异常需求和严重的物流中断。特别是,现有的智能平台和交付程序略有修改,但迅速处理特定的中断。多家企业、政府和整个中国社会的共同努力为克服这些挑战做出了贡献。京东的经验有助于理解在2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)疫情等大规模供应链中断的可能性下,投资于运营灵活性和超越供应链协作的价值。在“摆脱大流行:企业如何将内部能力与外部资源相匹配,以塑造业务弹性?”(Li et al., 2023),作者探讨了企业如何寻求有效地将内部能力与供应链网络的外部资源相结合,以提高COVID-19大流行期间的运营灵活性和稳定性。内部柔性是指产品多样性,内部稳定性是指运营效率,外部柔性是指结构漏洞,外部稳定性是指网络中心性。在匹配理论的基础上,作者提供了一个内外结合的视角来解释不同匹配背后的操作机制。基于2994家独特企业的实证结果和5293个观察结果,他们发现内部(外部)灵活性与外部(内部)稳定性之间的异质性越强的组合可能会产生互补效应,从而增强经营弹性,而内部(或稳定性)与外部(或稳定性)之间的异质性越强的组合可能会产生替代效应,从而降低经营弹性。由于2019冠状病毒病大流行对供应链产生了重大影响,政府举措在管理危机方面发挥了核心作用。在“政府COVID-19措施对制造商股票市场估值的影响:劳动强度和经营松弛的作用”(Chen et al., 2023)中,作者研究了中国政府一级应急政策(Ge et al., 2020)对制造商股票市场价值的影响,以及制造商经营松弛对增加弹性的作用。 对2366家中国制造业上市公司26488家公司季度观察的分析表明,集中化可能是有害的,也可能是有益的,这取决于交易所角色和危机阶段。其中,顾客集中度加剧了中断阶段企业生产率的下行,但促进了恢复阶段企业生产率的恢复;供应商集中度对中断阶段企业生产率没有显著影响,但阻碍了恢复阶段企业生产率的反弹。
{"title":"Building responsive and resilient supply chains: Lessons from the COVID-19 disruption","authors":"Xiang Li, Xiande Zhao, Hau L. Lee, Chris Voss","doi":"10.1002/joom.1250","DOIUrl":"10.1002/joom.1250","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Since the first case was identified, COVID-19 has spread to more than 200 countries. As of October 25, 2022, it had resulted in over 6 million deaths and 600 million confirmed cases. The rapid widespread of COVID-19 led to large-scale disruptions with major supply and demand shocks in supply chains, causing significant negative impacts on the global economy. The World Bank reported that the world GDP growth rate for 2020 was −3.27%, indicating the worst recession since 1961.</p><p>First, the initial epidemic-control efforts blocked the flows of raw materials across the world, and limited labor movements by imposing temporary travel restrictions. As a result, many firms struggled with supply disruptions and labor shortages, setting off a chain reaction of disruption in global supply chains. Fortune (2020) reported that as of February 21, 2020, 94% of the <i>Fortune 1000</i> companies had experienced supply-chain disruptions due to COVID-19.<sup>1</sup> According to the <i>Institute for Supply Management</i>, almost 75% of companies reported supply-chain disruptions in some capacity due to coronavirus-related transportation restrictions.<sup>2</sup> A survey conducted by the <i>National Association of Manufacturers</i> reported that 78.3% of manufacturers believed that COVID-19 had a significant negative influence on their financial performance, and 35.5% of them had experienced some type of supply chain disruptions.<sup>3</sup></p><p>Second, the demand for essential personal-protective equipment increased dramatically because the virus was easily transmitted from person to person through air-borne droplets; accompanied by a drop in the need for other manufactured products (Nicola et al., <span>2020</span>). For example, COVID-19 had caused a surge in the demand of face masks that were necessary to prevent infection among frontline workers (who were directly exposed to the virus when treating infected patients or conducting nucleic acid tests) and individuals in public places. China was the main producer of masks at the start of the crisis, accounting for approximately half of world production. In January 2020, China could produce 20 million masks per day, which was insufficient to equip even just healthcare workers in China. As a result of extensive efforts by the government and companies, Chinese production increased six-fold and reached 116 million masks per day by the end of February, 2020. But even this was insufficient to meet its own demand, and China imported a large quantity of masks. Similarly, Germany also experienced very limited availability of face masks in the spring of 2020. To increase the supply of face masks, the German government contracted with hundreds of companies and introduced a series of incentives to encourage local, non-medical manufacturers to temporarily transform to produce masks.</p><p>More generally, demand patterns for supplies of all types became less predictable from the beginning of pandemic. Significant chan","PeriodicalId":51097,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Operations Management","volume":"69 3","pages":"352-358"},"PeriodicalIF":7.8,"publicationDate":"2023-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/joom.1250","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46437121","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Huseyn Abdulla, James D. Abbey, A. Selin Atalay, Margaret G. Meloy
We study the effectiveness of two theoretically and practically relevant interventions designed to increase familiarity with and thereby stimulate the appeal of and willingness to pay (WTP) for remanufactured (refurbished) consumer products that are often found repulsive by consumers: (1) educating consumers about the remanufacturing process, (2) providing physical exposure to remanufactured products. We find that education does not cause an increase in the appeal of and WTP for remanufactured consumer products. Providing physical exposure to remanufactured products, relative to text and text-plus picture or video modalities, significantly increases both the appeal and WTP as a result of increasing perceived quality and decreasing disgust. Sellers can benefit from marketing remanufactured consumer products through physical channels (i.e., brick-and-mortar, outlet, showroom stores) as opposed to solely through online channels, which is the common practice among many sellers.
{"title":"Show, don't tell: Education and physical exposure effects in remanufactured product markets","authors":"Huseyn Abdulla, James D. Abbey, A. Selin Atalay, Margaret G. Meloy","doi":"10.1002/joom.1248","DOIUrl":"10.1002/joom.1248","url":null,"abstract":"<p>We study the effectiveness of two theoretically and practically relevant interventions designed to increase familiarity with and thereby stimulate the appeal of and willingness to pay (WTP) for remanufactured (refurbished) consumer products that are often found repulsive by consumers: (1) educating consumers about the remanufacturing process, (2) providing physical exposure to remanufactured products. We find that education does not cause an increase in the appeal of and WTP for remanufactured consumer products. Providing physical exposure to remanufactured products, relative to text and text-plus picture or video modalities, significantly increases both the appeal and WTP as a result of increasing perceived quality and decreasing disgust. Sellers can benefit from marketing remanufactured consumer products through physical channels (i.e., brick-and-mortar, outlet, showroom stores) as opposed to solely through online channels, which is the common practice among many sellers.</p>","PeriodicalId":51097,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Operations Management","volume":"70 2","pages":"243-256"},"PeriodicalIF":7.8,"publicationDate":"2023-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48277512","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}