Pub Date : 2025-02-01Epub Date: 2024-11-19DOI: 10.1177/10775587241297351
Lynn Unruh, Aishwarya Joshi
This study describes trends in the number of administrators in Pennsylvania hospitals from 1991 to 2020, and in the proportion of administrators to other hospital staff. Data are from the Pennsylvania Department of Health and the American Hospital Association. We find that between 1991 and 2020, the average number of administrators increased by 102% (60% when adjusted for patient volume). RNs, all nurses, and total hospital staff did not increase to the same extent, so the proportion of administrators to these staff increased by 24%, 33%, and 70% respectively. Common policies for reducing administrative costs may or may not apply to reducing administrator growth. Other policies should be explored as we discover specifics about this growth. Future studies should include data from other states and lower-level administrative staff. Studies should also examine the relationship between the number and proportion of administrators and nurse staffing, costs and quality of care.
{"title":"Growth in Pennsylvania Hospital Administrators 1991-2020.","authors":"Lynn Unruh, Aishwarya Joshi","doi":"10.1177/10775587241297351","DOIUrl":"10.1177/10775587241297351","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study describes trends in the number of administrators in Pennsylvania hospitals from 1991 to 2020, and in the proportion of administrators to other hospital staff. Data are from the Pennsylvania Department of Health and the American Hospital Association. We find that between 1991 and 2020, the average number of administrators increased by 102% (60% when adjusted for patient volume). RNs, all nurses, and total hospital staff did not increase to the same extent, so the proportion of administrators to these staff increased by 24%, 33%, and 70% respectively. Common policies for reducing administrative costs may or may not apply to reducing administrator growth. Other policies should be explored as we discover specifics about this growth. Future studies should include data from other states and lower-level administrative staff. Studies should also examine the relationship between the number and proportion of administrators and nurse staffing, costs and quality of care.</p>","PeriodicalId":51127,"journal":{"name":"Medical Care Research and Review","volume":" ","pages":"107-113"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142669991","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-01Epub Date: 2024-10-29DOI: 10.1177/10775587241282163
Eric P Slade, Kelli DePriest, Yvonne Commodore-Mensah, Laura Samuel, Ginger C Hanson, Rita D'Aoust
State full practice authority (FPA) laws are designed to permit NPs to practice autonomously from physicians. Little is known regarding how FPA laws affect NPs' practice autonomy in daily practice. This study used nationwide survey data from 20,830 NPs to estimate how NPs' practice autonomy differs between NPs in FPA and non-FPA states. NPs in states with FPA laws were more than twice as likely as NPs in non-FPA states to practice in clinic settings with no onsite physicians and were twice as likely to not have a physician collaborator. Associations between FPA laws and four other indicators of practice autonomy were positive but smaller in magnitude. States with FPA laws more than 10 years experienced larger changes in nurse practitioner (NP) autonomy compared with states with FPA laws in effect less than 10 years. FPA laws may promote the development of autonomous NP practice sites, thereby expanding access in underserved populations.
{"title":"State Full Practice Authority Regulations and Nurse Practitioner Practice Autonomy: Evidence From the 2018 National Sample Survey of Registered Nurses.","authors":"Eric P Slade, Kelli DePriest, Yvonne Commodore-Mensah, Laura Samuel, Ginger C Hanson, Rita D'Aoust","doi":"10.1177/10775587241282163","DOIUrl":"10.1177/10775587241282163","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>State full practice authority (FPA) laws are designed to permit NPs to practice autonomously from physicians. Little is known regarding how FPA laws affect NPs' practice autonomy in daily practice. This study used nationwide survey data from 20,830 NPs to estimate how NPs' practice autonomy differs between NPs in FPA and non-FPA states. NPs in states with FPA laws were more than twice as likely as NPs in non-FPA states to practice in clinic settings with no onsite physicians and were twice as likely to not have a physician collaborator. Associations between FPA laws and four other indicators of practice autonomy were positive but smaller in magnitude. States with FPA laws more than 10 years experienced larger changes in nurse practitioner (NP) autonomy compared with states with FPA laws in effect less than 10 years. FPA laws may promote the development of autonomous NP practice sites, thereby expanding access in underserved populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":51127,"journal":{"name":"Medical Care Research and Review","volume":" ","pages":"68-78"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142523634","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-01Epub Date: 2024-05-06DOI: 10.1177/10775587241247682
Alexandra Harris, Sarah Philbin, Brady Post, Neil Jordan, Molly Beestrum, Richard Epstein, Megan McHugh
Vertical integration of health systems-the common ownership of different aspects of the health care system-continues to occur at increasing rates in the United States. This systematic review synthesizes recent evidence examining the association between two types of vertical integration-hospital-physician (n = 43 studies) and hospital-post-acute care (PAC; n = 10 studies)-and cost, quality, and health services utilization. Hospital-physician integration is associated with higher health care costs, but the effect on quality and health services utilization remains unclear. The effect of hospital-PAC integration on these three outcomes is ambiguous, particularly when focusing on hospital-SNF integration. These findings should raise some concern among policymakers about the trajectory of affordable, high-quality health care in the presence of increasing hospital-physician vertical integration but perhaps not hospital-PAC integration.
{"title":"Cost, Quality, and Utilization After Hospital-Physician and Hospital-Post Acute Care Vertical Integration: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Alexandra Harris, Sarah Philbin, Brady Post, Neil Jordan, Molly Beestrum, Richard Epstein, Megan McHugh","doi":"10.1177/10775587241247682","DOIUrl":"10.1177/10775587241247682","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Vertical integration of health systems-the common ownership of different aspects of the health care system-continues to occur at increasing rates in the United States. This systematic review synthesizes recent evidence examining the association between two types of vertical integration-hospital-physician (<i>n</i> = 43 studies) and hospital-post-acute care (PAC; <i>n</i> = 10 studies)-and cost, quality, and health services utilization. Hospital-physician integration is associated with higher health care costs, but the effect on quality and health services utilization remains unclear. The effect of hospital-PAC integration on these three outcomes is ambiguous, particularly when focusing on hospital-SNF integration. These findings should raise some concern among policymakers about the trajectory of affordable, high-quality health care in the presence of increasing hospital-physician vertical integration but perhaps not hospital-PAC integration.</p>","PeriodicalId":51127,"journal":{"name":"Medical Care Research and Review","volume":" ","pages":"3-42"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140858885","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-01Epub Date: 2024-09-05DOI: 10.1177/10775587241273429
Salam Abdus
Little is known about how take-up of Medicaid among eligible adults has changed since 2014. This study used data from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey to examine changes in Medicaid enrollment among Medicaid-eligible adults between 2014 and 2019. Eligibility for Medicaid was simulated using state- and year-specific eligibility rules. Among all Medicaid-eligible citizen adults aged 19-64 years, the proportion enrolled in Medicaid increased from 55.5% in 2014-2015 to 61.9% in 2016-2017, and then remained approximately at the same level in 2018-2019 (61.5%). Among adults who became eligible because of the Medicaid expansions, the proportion enrolled in Medicaid increased from 44.1% in 2014-2015 to 53.8% in 2016-2017. Among pre-Affordable Care Act (ACA)-eligible adults, there was no statistically significant change in the proportion enrolled in Medicaid between 2014-2015 and 2016-2017 (66.8% and 69.7%, respectively). There were significant differences in changes in take-up rates across population subgroups.
{"title":"Trends in Medicaid Take-Up Among Eligible Adults After the Affordable Care Act Medicaid Expansions: 2014-2019.","authors":"Salam Abdus","doi":"10.1177/10775587241273429","DOIUrl":"10.1177/10775587241273429","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Little is known about how take-up of Medicaid among eligible adults has changed since 2014. This study used data from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey to examine changes in Medicaid enrollment among Medicaid-eligible adults between 2014 and 2019. Eligibility for Medicaid was simulated using state- and year-specific eligibility rules. Among all Medicaid-eligible citizen adults aged 19-64 years, the proportion enrolled in Medicaid increased from 55.5% in 2014-2015 to 61.9% in 2016-2017, and then remained approximately at the same level in 2018-2019 (61.5%). Among adults who became eligible because of the Medicaid expansions, the proportion enrolled in Medicaid increased from 44.1% in 2014-2015 to 53.8% in 2016-2017. Among pre-Affordable Care Act (ACA)-eligible adults, there was no statistically significant change in the proportion enrolled in Medicaid between 2014-2015 and 2016-2017 (66.8% and 69.7%, respectively). There were significant differences in changes in take-up rates across population subgroups.</p>","PeriodicalId":51127,"journal":{"name":"Medical Care Research and Review","volume":" ","pages":"100-106"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142134402","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-17DOI: 10.1177/10775587241310922
Simone R Singh, Rachel Hogg-Graham
The number of hospitals screening patients for health-related social needs (HRSNs) has increased substantially in recent years, yet little is known about the extent to which hospitals invest in programs or strategies aimed at addressing identified needs. Using data from the 2022 American Hospital Association (AHA) Annual Survey for 2,468 non-federal general medical and surgical hospitals, this study explored screening rates and related interventions for eight HRSNs: housing, food insecurity, utilities, interpersonal violence, transportation, employment or income, education, and social isolation. Sample hospitals screened for an average of 6.1 HRSNs and had programs or strategies for an average of 5.4 HRSNs. Hospitals that screened their patients for HRSNs were significantly more likely to invest in interventions aimed at addressing these needs. Serving patients more holistically by addressing both medical and social needs has the potential to improve health outcomes and ultimately reduce health disparities.
{"title":"Hospital Involvement in Screening for and Addressing Patients' Health-Related Social Needs.","authors":"Simone R Singh, Rachel Hogg-Graham","doi":"10.1177/10775587241310922","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10775587241310922","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The number of hospitals screening patients for health-related social needs (HRSNs) has increased substantially in recent years, yet little is known about the extent to which hospitals invest in programs or strategies aimed at addressing identified needs. Using data from the 2022 American Hospital Association (AHA) Annual Survey for 2,468 non-federal general medical and surgical hospitals, this study explored screening rates and related interventions for eight HRSNs: housing, food insecurity, utilities, interpersonal violence, transportation, employment or income, education, and social isolation. Sample hospitals screened for an average of 6.1 HRSNs and had programs or strategies for an average of 5.4 HRSNs. Hospitals that screened their patients for HRSNs were significantly more likely to invest in interventions aimed at addressing these needs. Serving patients more holistically by addressing both medical and social needs has the potential to improve health outcomes and ultimately reduce health disparities.</p>","PeriodicalId":51127,"journal":{"name":"Medical Care Research and Review","volume":" ","pages":"10775587241310922"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143015591","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-02DOI: 10.1177/10775587241303963
Nicole Dussault, Dorian Ho, Haripriya Dukkipati, Judith B Vick, Lesley A Skalla, Jessica Ma, Christopher A Jones, Brystana G Kaufman
While community-based palliative care (CBPC) programs have been expanding, there remain important obstacles to widespread use. Since provider perspectives on CBPC remain underexplored, we conducted a scoping review to summarize provider perspectives regarding barriers and facilitators to implementation of adult CBPC in the United States. We systematically searched OVID, MEDLINE, and CINAHL for peer-reviewed qualitative research published from January 1, 2010 to January 9, 2024, then used PRISM framework synthesis to organize themes into provider, organization, and external environment levels. Thirty-four articles were included. At the provider level, barriers included misperceptions of palliative care (PC) by referring providers and poor communication, while facilitators included multidisciplinary teams and referring provider education. At the organizational level, time constraints were barriers, while leadership buy-in and co-located clinics were facilitators. At the external environment level, limited PC workforce and inadequate reimbursement were barriers. Our findings suggest that efforts aimed at scaling CBPC must address factors at the provider, organizational, and policy levels.
{"title":"Provider Perspectives on Implementation of Adult Community-Based Palliative Care: A Scoping Review.","authors":"Nicole Dussault, Dorian Ho, Haripriya Dukkipati, Judith B Vick, Lesley A Skalla, Jessica Ma, Christopher A Jones, Brystana G Kaufman","doi":"10.1177/10775587241303963","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10775587241303963","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>While community-based palliative care (CBPC) programs have been expanding, there remain important obstacles to widespread use. Since provider perspectives on CBPC remain underexplored, we conducted a scoping review to summarize provider perspectives regarding barriers and facilitators to implementation of adult CBPC in the United States. We systematically searched OVID, MEDLINE, and CINAHL for peer-reviewed qualitative research published from January 1, 2010 to January 9, 2024, then used PRISM framework synthesis to organize themes into provider, organization, and external environment levels. Thirty-four articles were included. At the provider level, barriers included misperceptions of palliative care (PC) by referring providers and poor communication, while facilitators included multidisciplinary teams and referring provider education. At the organizational level, time constraints were barriers, while leadership buy-in and co-located clinics were facilitators. At the external environment level, limited PC workforce and inadequate reimbursement were barriers. Our findings suggest that efforts aimed at scaling CBPC must address factors at the provider, organizational, and policy levels.</p>","PeriodicalId":51127,"journal":{"name":"Medical Care Research and Review","volume":" ","pages":"10775587241303963"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142916203","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-01Epub Date: 2024-02-25DOI: 10.1177/10775587241233614
Anagha Lokhande, David F Painter, Braden Vogt, Ankur Shah
End-stage kidney disease (ESKD) accounts for a sizable proportion of Medicare spending. Peritoneal dialysis remains an underutilized treatment modality for ESKD despite its quality of life and cost-saving benefits. Medicare policy on reimbursements and patient eligibility for dialysis coverage has been amended numerous times since its inception in 1972. Over the last two decades, Medicare policy on ESKD reimbursements has evolved from a primarily fee-for-service model to a prospective payment system, and within the past few years, it has begun including more experimental payment structures. While prior work has explored the evolution of Medicare's ESKD policy as a whole, we specifically outline the impact of Medicare policy changes on peritoneal dialysis reimbursement rates, uptake by physicians and dialysis facilities, and accessibility to patients. This narrative review offers historical insights, an overview of modern ESKD policy, actionable strategies, and policy opportunities to increase the accessibility of this treatment modality.
{"title":"Policy and Payment Decisions on Peritoneal Dialysis in the United States: A Review.","authors":"Anagha Lokhande, David F Painter, Braden Vogt, Ankur Shah","doi":"10.1177/10775587241233614","DOIUrl":"10.1177/10775587241233614","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>End-stage kidney disease (ESKD) accounts for a sizable proportion of Medicare spending. Peritoneal dialysis remains an underutilized treatment modality for ESKD despite its quality of life and cost-saving benefits. Medicare policy on reimbursements and patient eligibility for dialysis coverage has been amended numerous times since its inception in 1972. Over the last two decades, Medicare policy on ESKD reimbursements has evolved from a primarily fee-for-service model to a prospective payment system, and within the past few years, it has begun including more experimental payment structures. While prior work has explored the evolution of Medicare's ESKD policy as a whole, we specifically outline the impact of Medicare policy changes on peritoneal dialysis reimbursement rates, uptake by physicians and dialysis facilities, and accessibility to patients. This narrative review offers historical insights, an overview of modern ESKD policy, actionable strategies, and policy opportunities to increase the accessibility of this treatment modality.</p>","PeriodicalId":51127,"journal":{"name":"Medical Care Research and Review","volume":" ","pages":"419-431"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139974432","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-01Epub Date: 2024-09-19DOI: 10.1177/10775587241277954
Xinqi Li, Lex Frazier, Brett Lissenden, John Kautter, Robin McCrea
The onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in March 2020 had a sudden and substantial impact on health care utilization for most, if not all, individuals. We study the impact the pandemic had on the population insured in the individual and small group markets under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) of 2010, using administrative claims data from January 2019 through December 2021. Our results demonstrated how health care utilization differed between the acute phase (i.e., 2020) and the post-acute phase (i.e., 2021) compared with the pre-pandemic phase. We found that in the ACA markets, most spending and utilization categories decreased drastically during the initial months of the pandemic and recovered by the end of 2021. While the role of telehealth among office visits decreased substantially by the end of 2021, it remained the main mode of delivery for mental health services.
{"title":"Health Care Use of ACA Marketplace Enrollees During the COVID-19 Pandemic.","authors":"Xinqi Li, Lex Frazier, Brett Lissenden, John Kautter, Robin McCrea","doi":"10.1177/10775587241277954","DOIUrl":"10.1177/10775587241277954","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in March 2020 had a sudden and substantial impact on health care utilization for most, if not all, individuals. We study the impact the pandemic had on the population insured in the individual and small group markets under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) of 2010, using administrative claims data from January 2019 through December 2021. Our results demonstrated how health care utilization differed between the acute phase (i.e., 2020) and the post-acute phase (i.e., 2021) compared with the pre-pandemic phase. We found that in the ACA markets, most spending and utilization categories decreased drastically during the initial months of the pandemic and recovered by the end of 2021. While the role of telehealth among office visits decreased substantially by the end of 2021, it remained the main mode of delivery for mental health services.</p>","PeriodicalId":51127,"journal":{"name":"Medical Care Research and Review","volume":" ","pages":"464-473"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142300311","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-01Epub Date: 2024-10-02DOI: 10.1177/10775587241282403
Kathleen E Fitzpatrick Rosenbaum, Karen B Lasater, Matthew D McHugh, Eileen T Lake
Addressing patient experience is a priority in the health care system. Hospital Consumer Assessment of Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) survey results incentivize hospitals to elevate patient experience, a factor in patient-centered care. Although hospital nursing resources have been positively associated with better HCAHPS ratings, it is unknown how changes in nursing resources are associated with changes in HCAHPS ratings over time. This two-period longitudinal study ranked the associations between changes in nurse staffing, skill mix, nurse education, and work environment on HCAHPS ratings and found that changes in the work environment had the strongest associations (β = 2.29; p < .001) with improved HCAHPS ratings. Our findings provide hospital administrators with empirical evidence that may help make informed decisions on how to best invest limited resources to improve HCAHPS ratings, including the potential utility of improving the work environment through enhancing Nursing Quality of Care and Nurse Participation in Hospital Affairs.
{"title":"Changes in Patient Care Experiences and the Nurse Work Environment: A Longitudinal Study of U.S. Hospitals.","authors":"Kathleen E Fitzpatrick Rosenbaum, Karen B Lasater, Matthew D McHugh, Eileen T Lake","doi":"10.1177/10775587241282403","DOIUrl":"10.1177/10775587241282403","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Addressing patient experience is a priority in the health care system. Hospital Consumer Assessment of Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) survey results incentivize hospitals to elevate patient experience, a factor in patient-centered care. Although hospital nursing resources have been positively associated with better HCAHPS ratings, it is unknown how changes in nursing resources are associated with changes in HCAHPS ratings over time. This two-period longitudinal study ranked the associations between changes in nurse staffing, skill mix, nurse education, and work environment on HCAHPS ratings and found that changes in the work environment had the strongest associations (β = 2.29; <i>p</i> < .001) with improved HCAHPS ratings. Our findings provide hospital administrators with empirical evidence that may help make informed decisions on how to best invest limited resources to improve HCAHPS ratings, including the potential utility of improving the work environment through enhancing Nursing Quality of Care and Nurse Participation in Hospital Affairs.</p>","PeriodicalId":51127,"journal":{"name":"Medical Care Research and Review","volume":" ","pages":"444-454"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11780680/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142362405","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Public health care policymakers and payers are increasingly investing in efforts to address patients' health-related social needs (HRSNs) as a strategy for improving health while controlling or reducing costs. However, evidence regarding the implementation and impact of HRSN interventions remains limited. California's Whole Person Care Pilot program (WPC) was a Medicaid Section 1115 waiver demonstration program focused on the provision of care coordination and other services to address eligible beneficiaries' HRSN. In this study, we examine pilot-level variation in impact on acute care utilization and identify factors associated with differential outcomes. The majority of pilots reduced emergency department (ED) visits for enrollees relative to matched controls; however, only four pilots reduced both ED visits and hospitalizations. Coincidence analysis results highlight the importance of cross-sector partnerships, field-based outreach and engagement, and adequate program investment in differentiating pilots that reduced acute care utilization from those that did not.
{"title":"Program Implementation Strategies Associated With Reduced Acute Care Utilization for Medicaid Beneficiaries in California's Whole Person Care Pilot Program.","authors":"Emmeline Chuang, Dahai Yue, Brenna O'Masta, Leigh Ann Haley, Weihao Zhou, Nadereh Pourat","doi":"10.1177/10775587241273404","DOIUrl":"10.1177/10775587241273404","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Public health care policymakers and payers are increasingly investing in efforts to address patients' health-related social needs (HRSNs) as a strategy for improving health while controlling or reducing costs. However, evidence regarding the implementation and impact of HRSN interventions remains limited. California's Whole Person Care Pilot program (WPC) was a Medicaid Section 1115 waiver demonstration program focused on the provision of care coordination and other services to address eligible beneficiaries' HRSN. In this study, we examine pilot-level variation in impact on acute care utilization and identify factors associated with differential outcomes. The majority of pilots reduced emergency department (ED) visits for enrollees relative to matched controls; however, only four pilots reduced both ED visits and hospitalizations. Coincidence analysis results highlight the importance of cross-sector partnerships, field-based outreach and engagement, and adequate program investment in differentiating pilots that reduced acute care utilization from those that did not.</p>","PeriodicalId":51127,"journal":{"name":"Medical Care Research and Review","volume":" ","pages":"432-443"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11528969/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142121119","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}