Pub Date : 2024-10-14DOI: 10.1177/10775587241285135
Sarah MacCarthy, Peyton Miller, Ninez A Ponce, Marc N Elliott
We examined peer-reviewed publications analyzing data from the English GP Patient Survey (GPPS), U.S. National Health Interview Survey (NHIS), and California Health Interview Survey (CHIS) to explore how the health of sexual minority populations varies across settings and subgroups. We searched for English language articles published 2011-2022, screening abstracts (n = 112), reviewing full text (n = 97), and extracting data (n = 85). We conducted a content analysis to identify patterns across settings for sexual minority people compared with heterosexual counterparts and each other. Across all settings, sexual minority adults had poorer health care access, worse health outcomes and patient experiences, more detrimental health behaviors, and greater health care services utilization (reflecting risk awareness and need). When subgroup data were reported, differences were greater among women, except for HIV and related cancers, which were most prevalent among sexual minority men. Sexual minority people generally reported significantly worse health access, outcomes, and behaviors in all three settings.
{"title":"Assessing Narrative Patterns in Health Access, Outcomes, and Behaviors Across Three Data Sets From England, the United States, and California for Sexual Minority Adults.","authors":"Sarah MacCarthy, Peyton Miller, Ninez A Ponce, Marc N Elliott","doi":"10.1177/10775587241285135","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10775587241285135","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We examined peer-reviewed publications analyzing data from the English GP Patient Survey (GPPS), U.S. National Health Interview Survey (NHIS), and California Health Interview Survey (CHIS) to explore how the health of sexual minority populations varies across settings and subgroups. We searched for English language articles published 2011-2022, screening abstracts (<i>n</i> = 112), reviewing full text (<i>n</i> = 97), and extracting data (<i>n</i> = 85). We conducted a content analysis to identify patterns across settings for sexual minority people compared with heterosexual counterparts and each other. Across all settings, sexual minority adults had poorer health care access, worse health outcomes and patient experiences, more detrimental health behaviors, and greater health care services utilization (reflecting risk awareness and need). When subgroup data were reported, differences were greater among women, except for HIV and related cancers, which were most prevalent among sexual minority men. Sexual minority people generally reported significantly worse health access, outcomes, and behaviors in all three settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":51127,"journal":{"name":"Medical Care Research and Review","volume":" ","pages":"10775587241285135"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142480112","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-12DOI: 10.1177/10775587241284328
Paulo J Gomes, Tala Mirzaei
Health care organizations are increasingly using team huddles to enhance communication, improve patient experience, and deliver timely care. However, established practices, resource constraints, and hierarchical role dynamics can hinder the effectiveness of huddling. This study investigates the dynamics of care huddle implementation through interviews with care providers and managers of an observation unit in a U.S. hospital. Qualitative analysis of interview data reveals that huddle adoption enhances relational coordination (RC), thus highlighting the importance of both coaching interventions in fostering proactive behavior and the building of a work environment aligned toward shared goals. The findings affirm RC as a dynamic change model, examining its interplay with organizational processes and structure. The study underscores the significance of adaptations in work processes, the role of informal boundary spanners in facilitating cross-departmental coordination, and structural changes that increase autonomy for low-power actors. We offer actionable recommendations for health care organizations aiming to improve care coordination.
{"title":"Evolving Dynamics of Relational Coordination: A Study of Progression of Care Huddles in Hospital Observation Services.","authors":"Paulo J Gomes, Tala Mirzaei","doi":"10.1177/10775587241284328","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10775587241284328","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Health care organizations are increasingly using team huddles to enhance communication, improve patient experience, and deliver timely care. However, established practices, resource constraints, and hierarchical role dynamics can hinder the effectiveness of huddling. This study investigates the dynamics of care huddle implementation through interviews with care providers and managers of an observation unit in a U.S. hospital. Qualitative analysis of interview data reveals that huddle adoption enhances relational coordination (RC), thus highlighting the importance of both coaching interventions in fostering proactive behavior and the building of a work environment aligned toward shared goals. The findings affirm RC as a dynamic change model, examining its interplay with organizational processes and structure. The study underscores the significance of adaptations in work processes, the role of informal boundary spanners in facilitating cross-departmental coordination, and structural changes that increase autonomy for low-power actors. We offer actionable recommendations for health care organizations aiming to improve care coordination.</p>","PeriodicalId":51127,"journal":{"name":"Medical Care Research and Review","volume":" ","pages":"10775587241284328"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142480113","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-01Epub Date: 2024-06-12DOI: 10.1177/10775587241257983
Brianna M Lombardi, Lisa de Saxe Zerden, Erin Fraher
Behavioral health needs continue rise in the United States and constitute a key driver of health care utilization, costs, and outcomes. Social workers provide a wide range of services across health, behavioral health, and community settings, and while this heterogeneity in practice benefits care delivery, it complicates health workforce analyses. This analysis compares five commonly used national data sources and details similarities and differences in their estimates of the number, type, and practice characteristics of social workers. The analysis suggests that estimates vary significantly between data sets ranging from 282,425 to 1,022,859 social workers; as well as yield different findings of types of social workers in the United States, depending on the data set used. These differences have the potential to shape how researchers and policy makers assess the adequacy of the social work workforce and identify solutions to address the nation's behavioral health and social care needs.
{"title":"Varying Estimates of Social Workers in the United States: Which Data Source to Use?","authors":"Brianna M Lombardi, Lisa de Saxe Zerden, Erin Fraher","doi":"10.1177/10775587241257983","DOIUrl":"10.1177/10775587241257983","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Behavioral health needs continue rise in the United States and constitute a key driver of health care utilization, costs, and outcomes. Social workers provide a wide range of services across health, behavioral health, and community settings, and while this heterogeneity in practice benefits care delivery, it complicates health workforce analyses. This analysis compares five commonly used national data sources and details similarities and differences in their estimates of the number, type, and practice characteristics of social workers. The analysis suggests that estimates vary significantly between data sets ranging from 282,425 to 1,022,859 social workers; as well as yield different findings of types of social workers in the United States, depending on the data set used. These differences have the potential to shape how researchers and policy makers assess the adequacy of the social work workforce and identify solutions to address the nation's behavioral health and social care needs.</p>","PeriodicalId":51127,"journal":{"name":"Medical Care Research and Review","volume":" ","pages":"408-416"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11389054/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141307339","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-01Epub Date: 2024-05-31DOI: 10.1177/10775587241251868
Alissa B Sideman, Alma Hernandez de Jesus, Cecilia Alagappan, Melissa Ma, Christopher J Koenig, Loren I Alving, Freddi Segal-Gidan, Rachel Goldberger, Dana Sohmer, Howie Rosen
Primary care practitioners (PCPs) are the first point of contact for most patients with suspected dementia and have identified a need for more training and support around dementia diagnosis and care. This qualitative study examined the Alzheimer's Disease-Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes (AD-ECHO) program. AD-ECHO was designed to strengthen PCP capacity in dementia through bimonthly virtual meetings with a team of dementia experts. We conducted 24 hr of direct observations at AD-ECHO sessions and interviewed 14 participants about their experiences participating. Using thematic analysis, we found that participants valued the supportive learning environment and resources; knowledge gained empowered them to take more action around dementia; they identified ways of disseminating knowledge gained into their practice settings, and many desired ongoing AD-ECHO engagement. However, most identified time as a barrier to participation. AD-ECHO has the potential to strengthen the primary care workforce's knowledge and confidence around dementia care.
{"title":"Strengthening Primary Care Workforce Capacity in Dementia Diagnosis and Care: A Qualitative Study of Project Alzheimer's Disease-ECHO.","authors":"Alissa B Sideman, Alma Hernandez de Jesus, Cecilia Alagappan, Melissa Ma, Christopher J Koenig, Loren I Alving, Freddi Segal-Gidan, Rachel Goldberger, Dana Sohmer, Howie Rosen","doi":"10.1177/10775587241251868","DOIUrl":"10.1177/10775587241251868","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Primary care practitioners (PCPs) are the first point of contact for most patients with suspected dementia and have identified a need for more training and support around dementia diagnosis and care. This qualitative study examined the Alzheimer's Disease-Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes (AD-ECHO) program. AD-ECHO was designed to strengthen PCP capacity in dementia through bimonthly virtual meetings with a team of dementia experts. We conducted 24 hr of direct observations at AD-ECHO sessions and interviewed 14 participants about their experiences participating. Using thematic analysis, we found that participants valued the supportive learning environment and resources; knowledge gained empowered them to take more action around dementia; they identified ways of disseminating knowledge gained into their practice settings, and many desired ongoing AD-ECHO engagement. However, most identified time as a barrier to participation. AD-ECHO has the potential to strengthen the primary care workforce's knowledge and confidence around dementia care.</p>","PeriodicalId":51127,"journal":{"name":"Medical Care Research and Review","volume":" ","pages":"384-394"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11389049/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141184775","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-01Epub Date: 2024-03-07DOI: 10.1177/10775587241235244
Olivia S Jung, Patricia Satterstrom, Sara J Singer
To foster bottom-up innovations, health care organizations are leveraging interdisciplinary frontline innovation teams. These teams include workers across hierarchical levels and professional backgrounds, pooling diverse knowledge sources to develop innovations that improve patient and worker experiences and care quality, equity, and costs. Yet, these frontline innovation teams experience barriers, such as time constraints, being new to innovation, and team-based role hierarchies. We investigated the practices that such teams in federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) used to overcome these barriers. Our 20-month study of two FQHC innovation teams provides one of the first accounts of how practices that sustained worker engagement in innovation and supported their ideas to implementation evolve over time. We also show the varied quantity of engagement practices used at different stages of the innovation process. At a time when FQHCs face pressure to innovate amid staff shortages, our study provides recommendations to support their work.
{"title":"Engaging Interdisciplinary Innovation Teams in Federally Qualified Health Centers.","authors":"Olivia S Jung, Patricia Satterstrom, Sara J Singer","doi":"10.1177/10775587241235244","DOIUrl":"10.1177/10775587241235244","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To foster bottom-up innovations, health care organizations are leveraging interdisciplinary frontline innovation teams. These teams include workers across hierarchical levels and professional backgrounds, pooling diverse knowledge sources to develop innovations that improve patient and worker experiences and care quality, equity, and costs. Yet, these frontline innovation teams experience barriers, such as time constraints, being new to innovation, and team-based role hierarchies. We investigated the practices that such teams in federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) used to overcome these barriers. Our 20-month study of two FQHC innovation teams provides one of the first accounts of how practices that sustained worker engagement in innovation and supported their ideas to implementation evolve over time. We also show the varied quantity of engagement practices used at different stages of the innovation process. At a time when FQHCs face pressure to innovate amid staff shortages, our study provides recommendations to support their work.</p>","PeriodicalId":51127,"journal":{"name":"Medical Care Research and Review","volume":" ","pages":"370-383"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11389058/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140050944","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-01Epub Date: 2024-07-29DOI: 10.1177/10775587241264594
Christopher G Slatore, Jennifer Y Scott, Elizabeth R Hooker, Natalie Disher, Sara Golden, Diana Govier, Denise M Hynes
Many Veterans receive Department of Veterans Affairs (VA)-purchased care from non-VA facilities but little is known about factors that Veterans consider for this choice. Between May 2020 and August 2021, we surveyed VA-purchased care-eligible VA patients about barriers and facilitators to choosing where to receive care. We examined the association between travel time to their VA facility and their choice of VA-purchased care (VA-paid health care received in non-VA settings) versus VA facility and whether this association was modified by distrust. We received 1,662 responses and 692 (42%) chose a VA facility. Eighty percent reported quality care was in their top three factors that influenced their decision. Respondents with the highest distrust and who lived >1 hr from the nearest VA facility had the lowest predicted probability (PP) of choosing VA (PP 15%; 95% confidence interval: 10%-20%). Veterans value quality of care. VA and other health care systems should consider patient-centered ways to improve and publicize quality and reduce distrust.
{"title":"Motivators, Barriers, and Facilitators to Choosing Care in VA Facilities Versus VA-Purchased Care.","authors":"Christopher G Slatore, Jennifer Y Scott, Elizabeth R Hooker, Natalie Disher, Sara Golden, Diana Govier, Denise M Hynes","doi":"10.1177/10775587241264594","DOIUrl":"10.1177/10775587241264594","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Many Veterans receive Department of Veterans Affairs (VA)-purchased care from non-VA facilities but little is known about factors that Veterans consider for this choice. Between May 2020 and August 2021, we surveyed VA-purchased care-eligible VA patients about barriers and facilitators to choosing where to receive care. We examined the association between travel time to their VA facility and their choice of VA-purchased care (VA-paid health care received in non-VA settings) versus VA facility and whether this association was modified by distrust. We received 1,662 responses and 692 (42%) chose a VA facility. Eighty percent reported quality care was in their top three factors that influenced their decision. Respondents with the highest distrust and who lived >1 hr from the nearest VA facility had the lowest predicted probability (PP) of choosing VA (PP 15%; 95% confidence interval: 10%-20%). Veterans value quality of care. VA and other health care systems should consider patient-centered ways to improve and publicize quality and reduce distrust.</p>","PeriodicalId":51127,"journal":{"name":"Medical Care Research and Review","volume":" ","pages":"395-407"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141793987","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-05DOI: 10.1177/10775587241273429
Salam Abdus
Little is known about how take-up of Medicaid among eligible adults has changed since 2014. This study used data from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey to examine changes in Medicaid enrollment among Medicaid-eligible adults between 2014 and 2019. Eligibility for Medicaid was simulated using state- and year-specific eligibility rules. Among all Medicaid-eligible citizen adults aged 19-64 years, the proportion enrolled in Medicaid increased from 55.5% in 2014-2015 to 61.9% in 2016-2017, and then remained approximately at the same level in 2018-2019 (61.5%). Among adults who became eligible because of the Medicaid expansions, the proportion enrolled in Medicaid increased from 44.1% in 2014-2015 to 53.8% in 2016-2017. Among pre-Affordable Care Act (ACA)-eligible adults, there was no statistically significant change in the proportion enrolled in Medicaid between 2014-2015 and 2016-2017 (66.8% and 69.7%, respectively). There were significant differences in changes in take-up rates across population subgroups.
{"title":"Trends in Medicaid Take-Up Among Eligible Adults After the Affordable Care Act Medicaid Expansions: 2014-2019.","authors":"Salam Abdus","doi":"10.1177/10775587241273429","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10775587241273429","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Little is known about how take-up of Medicaid among eligible adults has changed since 2014. This study used data from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey to examine changes in Medicaid enrollment among Medicaid-eligible adults between 2014 and 2019. Eligibility for Medicaid was simulated using state- and year-specific eligibility rules. Among all Medicaid-eligible citizen adults aged 19-64 years, the proportion enrolled in Medicaid increased from 55.5% in 2014-2015 to 61.9% in 2016-2017, and then remained approximately at the same level in 2018-2019 (61.5%). Among adults who became eligible because of the Medicaid expansions, the proportion enrolled in Medicaid increased from 44.1% in 2014-2015 to 53.8% in 2016-2017. Among pre-Affordable Care Act (ACA)-eligible adults, there was no statistically significant change in the proportion enrolled in Medicaid between 2014-2015 and 2016-2017 (66.8% and 69.7%, respectively). There were significant differences in changes in take-up rates across population subgroups.</p>","PeriodicalId":51127,"journal":{"name":"Medical Care Research and Review","volume":" ","pages":"10775587241273429"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142134402","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-03DOI: 10.1177/10775587241273355
Andreea Panturu, Richard van Kleef, Frank Eijkenaar, Daniëlle Cattel
Prospective payments for health care providers require adequate risk adjustment (RA) to address systematic variation in patients' health care needs. However, the design of RA for provider payment involves many choices and difficult trade-offs between incentives for risk selection, incentives for cost control, and feasibility. Despite a growing literature, a comprehensive framework of these choices and trade-offs is lacking. This article aims to develop such a framework. Using literature review and expert consultation, we identify key design choices for RA in the context of provider payment and subsequently categorize these choices along two dimensions: (a) the choice of risk adjusters and (b) the choice of payment weights. For each design choice, we provide an overview of options, trade-offs, and key references. By making design choices and associated trade-offs explicit, our framework facilitates customizing RA design to provider payment systems, given the objectives and other characteristics of the context of interest.
对医疗服务提供者的预期付费需要适当的风险调整(RA),以应对患者医疗需求的系统性变化。然而,医疗服务提供者付款的风险调整设计涉及许多选择,以及风险选择激励、成本控制激励和可行性之间的艰难权衡。尽管文献越来越多,但仍缺乏一个全面的框架来说明这些选择和权衡。本文旨在建立这样一个框架。通过文献回顾和专家咨询,我们确定了医疗服务提供者支付背景下 RA 的关键设计选择,并随后从两个维度对这些选择进行了分类:(a)风险调整器的选择和(b)支付权重的选择。对于每一种设计选择,我们都会提供有关选择、权衡和主要参考资料的概述。通过明确设计选择和相关权衡,我们的框架有助于根据目标和相关背景的其他特征,为医疗服务提供者支付系统定制 RA 设计。
{"title":"A Framework for the Design of Risk-Adjustment Models in Health Care Provider Payment Systems.","authors":"Andreea Panturu, Richard van Kleef, Frank Eijkenaar, Daniëlle Cattel","doi":"10.1177/10775587241273355","DOIUrl":"10.1177/10775587241273355","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Prospective payments for health care providers require adequate risk adjustment (RA) to address systematic variation in patients' health care needs. However, the design of RA for provider payment involves many choices and difficult trade-offs between incentives for risk selection, incentives for cost control, and feasibility. Despite a growing literature, a comprehensive framework of these choices and trade-offs is lacking. This article aims to develop such a framework. Using literature review and expert consultation, we identify key design choices for RA in the context of provider payment and subsequently categorize these choices along two dimensions: (a) the choice of risk adjusters and (b) the choice of payment weights. For each design choice, we provide an overview of options, trade-offs, and key references. By making design choices and associated trade-offs explicit, our framework facilitates customizing RA design to provider payment systems, given the objectives and other characteristics of the context of interest.</p>","PeriodicalId":51127,"journal":{"name":"Medical Care Research and Review","volume":" ","pages":"10775587241273355"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142121118","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-08-01Epub Date: 2023-12-20DOI: 10.1177/10775587231215221
Cara B Safon, Lois McCloskey, Sarah H Gordon, Megan B Cole, Jack Clark
Evidence suggests that perinatal doula care can support maternal health and reduce racial inequities among low-income pregnant and postpartum people, prompting growing interest by state Medicaid agencies to reimburse for doula services. Emerging peer-reviewed and gray literature document factors facilitating or impeding that reimbursement. We conducted a scoping review of that literature (2012-2022) to distill key policy considerations for policymakers and advocates in the inclusion of doula care as a Medicaid-covered benefit. Fifty-three reports met the inclusion criteria. Most (53%) were published in 2021 or 2022. Their stated objectives were advocating for expanded access to doula care (17%), describing barriers to policy implementation, and/or offering recommendations to overcome the barriers (17%). A primary policy consideration among states was prioritizing partnership with doulas and doula advocates to inform robust and equitable policymaking to sustain the doula profession.
{"title":"Medicaid Reimbursement for Doula Care: Policy Considerations From a Scoping Review.","authors":"Cara B Safon, Lois McCloskey, Sarah H Gordon, Megan B Cole, Jack Clark","doi":"10.1177/10775587231215221","DOIUrl":"10.1177/10775587231215221","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Evidence suggests that perinatal doula care can support maternal health and reduce racial inequities among low-income pregnant and postpartum people, prompting growing interest by state Medicaid agencies to reimburse for doula services. Emerging peer-reviewed and gray literature document factors facilitating or impeding that reimbursement. We conducted a scoping review of that literature (2012-2022) to distill key policy considerations for policymakers and advocates in the inclusion of doula care as a Medicaid-covered benefit. Fifty-three reports met the inclusion criteria. Most (53%) were published in 2021 or 2022. Their stated objectives were advocating for expanded access to doula care (17%), describing barriers to policy implementation, and/or offering recommendations to overcome the barriers (17%). A primary policy consideration among states was prioritizing partnership with doulas and doula advocates to inform robust and equitable policymaking to sustain the doula profession.</p>","PeriodicalId":51127,"journal":{"name":"Medical Care Research and Review","volume":" ","pages":"311-326"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138832859","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-08-01Epub Date: 2024-05-14DOI: 10.1177/10775587241251870
Joshua Snoke, Ann Haas, Steven C Martino, Marc N Elliott
Census data are vital to health care research but must also protect respondents' confidentiality. The 2020 decennial Census employs a new Differential Privacy framework; this study examines its effect on the accuracy of an important tool for measuring health disparities, the Bayesian Improved Surname and Geocoding (BISG) algorithm, which uses Census Block Group data to estimate race and ethnicity when self-reported data are unavailable. Using self-reported race and ethnicity data as our standard, we compared the accuracy of BISG estimates calculated using the original 2010 Census counts to the accuracy of estimates calculated using 2010 data but with 2020 Differential Privacy in place. The Differential Privacy methodology slightly decreases BISG accuracy for American Indian and Alaska Native people but has little effect for other groups, suggesting that the methodology will not impede health disparities research that employs BISG and similar methods.
{"title":"Differential Privacy Protections in 2020 U.S. Decennial Census Data Do Not Impede Measurement of Racial and Ethnic Disparities.","authors":"Joshua Snoke, Ann Haas, Steven C Martino, Marc N Elliott","doi":"10.1177/10775587241251870","DOIUrl":"10.1177/10775587241251870","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Census data are vital to health care research but must also protect respondents' confidentiality. The 2020 decennial Census employs a new Differential Privacy framework; this study examines its effect on the accuracy of an important tool for measuring health disparities, the Bayesian Improved Surname and Geocoding (BISG) algorithm, which uses Census Block Group data to estimate race and ethnicity when self-reported data are unavailable. Using self-reported race and ethnicity data as our standard, we compared the accuracy of BISG estimates calculated using the original 2010 Census counts to the accuracy of estimates calculated using 2010 data but with 2020 Differential Privacy in place. The Differential Privacy methodology slightly decreases BISG accuracy for American Indian and Alaska Native people but has little effect for other groups, suggesting that the methodology will not impede health disparities research that employs BISG and similar methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":51127,"journal":{"name":"Medical Care Research and Review","volume":" ","pages":"346-350"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140922745","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}