Pub Date : 2023-12-01Epub Date: 2023-07-18DOI: 10.1177/10775587231187782
Christopher S Brunt, John R Bowblis
Recently, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) introduced staffing measures related to staffing variability and turnover in the Nursing Home (NH) Care Compare Five-Star Quality Rating System. While the consensus within the literature is that reduced variability and turnover are associated with higher NH quality of care and life, no existing studies have evaluated the relationship between CMS's newly introduced staffing measures and quality. This study uses regression analysis to estimate the relationship between 13 quality measures (used in Care Compare) and CMS's new staffing measures (i.e., weekend nursing staff levels, total nursing and registered nurse staff turnover, and administrator turnover) as well as a measure of daily staffing variation recently introduced in the literature called the coefficient of variation. Regressions analysis finds strong evidence of an association between quality and these staffing measures, though some measures (e.g., nursing staff turnover) are highly correlated and may be duplicative.
{"title":"Beyond Nursing Staff Levels: The Association of Nursing Home Quality and the Five-Star Quality Rating System's New Staffing Measures.","authors":"Christopher S Brunt, John R Bowblis","doi":"10.1177/10775587231187782","DOIUrl":"10.1177/10775587231187782","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Recently, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) introduced staffing measures related to staffing variability and turnover in the Nursing Home (NH) <i>Care Compare</i> Five-Star Quality Rating System. While the consensus within the literature is that reduced variability and turnover are associated with higher NH quality of care and life, no existing studies have evaluated the relationship between CMS's newly introduced staffing measures and quality. This study uses regression analysis to estimate the relationship between 13 quality measures (used in <i>Care Compare</i>) and CMS's new staffing measures (i.e., weekend nursing staff levels, total nursing and registered nurse staff turnover, and administrator turnover) as well as a measure of daily staffing variation recently introduced in the literature called the coefficient of variation. Regressions analysis finds strong evidence of an association between quality and these staffing measures, though some measures (e.g., nursing staff turnover) are highly correlated and may be duplicative.</p>","PeriodicalId":51127,"journal":{"name":"Medical Care Research and Review","volume":" ","pages":"631-640"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10185836","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Multiple chronic conditions (MCCs) are more common and costly than any individual health condition in the United States. The growing workforce of nurse practitioners (NPs) plays an active role in providing primary care to this patient population. This study identifies the effect of NP primary care models, compared with models without NP involvement, on cost, quality, and service utilization by patients with MCCs. We conducted a literature search of six databases and performed critical appraisal. Fifteen studies met inclusion criteria (years: 2003-2021). Overall, most studies showed reduced or similar costs, equivalent or better quality, and similar or lower rates of emergency department use and hospitalization associated with NP primary care models for patients with MCCs, compared with models without NP involvement. No studies found them associated with worse outcomes. Thus, NP primary care models, compared with models without NP involvement, have similar or positive impacts on MCC patient outcomes.
{"title":"A Systematic Review of Outcomes Related to Nurse Practitioner-Delivered Primary Care for Multiple Chronic Conditions.","authors":"Amy McMenamin, Eleanor Turi, Amelia Schlak, Lusine Poghosyan","doi":"10.1177/10775587231186720","DOIUrl":"10.1177/10775587231186720","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Multiple chronic conditions (MCCs) are more common and costly than any individual health condition in the United States. The growing workforce of nurse practitioners (NPs) plays an active role in providing primary care to this patient population. This study identifies the effect of NP primary care models, compared with models without NP involvement, on cost, quality, and service utilization by patients with MCCs. We conducted a literature search of six databases and performed critical appraisal. Fifteen studies met inclusion criteria (years: 2003-2021). Overall, most studies showed reduced or similar costs, equivalent or better quality, and similar or lower rates of emergency department use and hospitalization associated with NP primary care models for patients with MCCs, compared with models without NP involvement. No studies found them associated with worse outcomes. Thus, NP primary care models, compared with models without NP involvement, have similar or positive impacts on MCC patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":51127,"journal":{"name":"Medical Care Research and Review","volume":" ","pages":"563-581"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10784406/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10132258","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-12-01Epub Date: 2023-08-03DOI: 10.1177/10775587231190127
Susan A Chapman, Jacqueline R Miller, Joanne Spetz
Emerging technological advances hold potential to assist the long-term care (LTC) workforce in caring for an aging population in the home and LTC settings. Technology may alter workforce needs and mitigate rising workforce demand. This study identified and assessed emerging technologies that may assist, replace, and/or support recruitment and retention of the LTC workforce and identified barriers and facilitators to their implementation. We identified a variety of technologies with applications for LTC, created a taxonomy of technology types and functions across LTC settings, and conducted semi-structured interviews with a sample of company leaders to assess perceived impact of their products and services on the LTC workforce. Thematic analysis of those interviews found that technology is not currently positioned to replace the LTC workforce but may facilitate work and support worker recruitment and retention. More rigorous evaluation of technologies in LTC and financing mechanisms are needed to support widespread adoption.
{"title":"Emerging Health Technologies in Long-Term Care and Suppliers' Views on Their Potential to Assist and Support the Workforce.","authors":"Susan A Chapman, Jacqueline R Miller, Joanne Spetz","doi":"10.1177/10775587231190127","DOIUrl":"10.1177/10775587231190127","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Emerging technological advances hold potential to assist the long-term care (LTC) workforce in caring for an aging population in the home and LTC settings. Technology may alter workforce needs and mitigate rising workforce demand. This study identified and assessed emerging technologies that may assist, replace, and/or support recruitment and retention of the LTC workforce and identified barriers and facilitators to their implementation. We identified a variety of technologies with applications for LTC, created a taxonomy of technology types and functions across LTC settings, and conducted semi-structured interviews with a sample of company leaders to assess perceived impact of their products and services on the LTC workforce. Thematic analysis of those interviews found that technology is not currently positioned to replace the LTC workforce but may facilitate work and support worker recruitment and retention. More rigorous evaluation of technologies in LTC and financing mechanisms are needed to support widespread adoption.</p>","PeriodicalId":51127,"journal":{"name":"Medical Care Research and Review","volume":" ","pages":"619-630"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10637095/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9918178","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-12-01Epub Date: 2023-06-17DOI: 10.1177/10775587231180673
Chidiogo Anyigbo, Emmalee Todd, Dmitry Tumin, Jennifer Kusma
Health insurance stability among children with adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) is essential for accessing health care services. This cross-sectional study used an extensive, multi-year, nationally representative database of children aged 0 to 17 to examine the association between ACE scores and continuous or intermittent lack of health insurance over a 12-month period. Secondary outcomes were reported reasons for coverage gaps. Compared with children having 0 ACEs, those with 4+ ACEs had a higher likelihood of being part-year uninsured rather than year-round private insured (relative risk ratio [RRR]: 4.20; 95% CI: 3.25, 5.43), year-round public insured (RRR: 1.37; 95% CI: 1.06, 1.76), or year-round uninsured (RRR: 2.28; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.63, 3.21). Among children who experienced part-year or year-round uninsurance, a higher ACE score was associated with a greater likelihood of coverage gap due to difficulties with the application or renewal process. Policy changes to reduce administrative burdens may improve health insurance stability and access to health care among children who endure ACEs.
{"title":"Health Insurance Coverage Gaps Among Children With a History of Adversity.","authors":"Chidiogo Anyigbo, Emmalee Todd, Dmitry Tumin, Jennifer Kusma","doi":"10.1177/10775587231180673","DOIUrl":"10.1177/10775587231180673","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Health insurance stability among children with adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) is essential for accessing health care services. This cross-sectional study used an extensive, multi-year, nationally representative database of children aged 0 to 17 to examine the association between ACE scores and continuous or intermittent lack of health insurance over a 12-month period. Secondary outcomes were reported reasons for coverage gaps. Compared with children having 0 ACEs, those with 4+ ACEs had a higher likelihood of being part-year uninsured rather than year-round private insured (relative risk ratio [RRR]: 4.20; 95% CI: 3.25, 5.43), year-round public insured (RRR: 1.37; 95% CI: 1.06, 1.76), or year-round uninsured (RRR: 2.28; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.63, 3.21). Among children who experienced part-year or year-round uninsurance, a higher ACE score was associated with a greater likelihood of coverage gap due to difficulties with the application or renewal process. Policy changes to reduce administrative burdens may improve health insurance stability and access to health care among children who endure ACEs.</p>","PeriodicalId":51127,"journal":{"name":"Medical Care Research and Review","volume":" ","pages":"648-658"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9648249","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-12-01Epub Date: 2023-06-27DOI: 10.1177/10775587231183192
Lexie R Grove, Seth A Berkowitz, Gary Cuddeback, George H Pink, Sally Clark Stearns, Til Stürmer, Marisa Elena Domino
This study assessed whether permanent supportive housing (PSH) participation is associated with health service use among a population of adults with disabilities, including people transitioning into PSH from community and institutional settings. Our primary data sources were 2014 to 2018 secondary data from a PSH program in North Carolina linked to Medicaid claims. We used propensity score weighting to estimate the average treatment effect on the treated of PSH participation. All models were stratified by whether individuals were in institutional or community settings prior to PSH. In weighted analyses, among individuals who were institutionalized prior to PSH, PSH participation was associated with greater hospitalizations and emergency department (ED) visits and fewer primary care visits during the follow-up period, compared with similar individuals who largely remained institutionalized. Individuals who entered PSH from community settings did not have significantly different health service use from similar comparison group members during the 12-month follow-up period.
{"title":"Permanent Supportive Housing Receipt and Health Care Use Among Adults With Disabilities.","authors":"Lexie R Grove, Seth A Berkowitz, Gary Cuddeback, George H Pink, Sally Clark Stearns, Til Stürmer, Marisa Elena Domino","doi":"10.1177/10775587231183192","DOIUrl":"10.1177/10775587231183192","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study assessed whether permanent supportive housing (PSH) participation is associated with health service use among a population of adults with disabilities, including people transitioning into PSH from community and institutional settings. Our primary data sources were 2014 to 2018 secondary data from a PSH program in North Carolina linked to Medicaid claims. We used propensity score weighting to estimate the average treatment effect on the treated of PSH participation. All models were stratified by whether individuals were in institutional or community settings prior to PSH. In weighted analyses, among individuals who were institutionalized prior to PSH, PSH participation was associated with greater hospitalizations and emergency department (ED) visits and fewer primary care visits during the follow-up period, compared with similar individuals who largely remained institutionalized. Individuals who entered PSH from community settings did not have significantly different health service use from similar comparison group members during the 12-month follow-up period.</p>","PeriodicalId":51127,"journal":{"name":"Medical Care Research and Review","volume":" ","pages":"596-607"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10637096/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10045887","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-12-01Epub Date: 2023-05-12DOI: 10.1177/10775587231168435
Emily A Gadbois, Joan F Brazier, Amy Meehan, Caroline Madrigal, Elizabeth M White, Aseel Rafat, David Grabowski, Renee R Shield
COVID-19 vaccinations are critical for mitigating outbreaks and reducing mortality for skilled nursing facility (SNF) residents and staff, yet uptake among SNF staff varies widely and remains suboptimal. Understanding which strategies are successful for promoting staff vaccination, and examining the relationship between vaccination policies and staff retention/turnover is key for identifying best practices. We conducted repeated interviews with SNF administrators at 3-month intervals between July 2020 and December 2021 (n = 156 interviews). We found that COVID-19 vaccines were initially met with both enthusiasm and skepticism by SNF staff. Administrators reported strategies to increase staff vaccine acceptance, including incentives, one-on-one education, and less stringent personal protective equipment requirements. Federal and state vaccination mandates further promoted vaccine uptake. This combination of mandates with prioritization of the vaccine by SNFs and their leadership was successful at increasing staff vaccination acceptance, which may be critical to increase staff booster uptake from its current suboptimal levels.
{"title":"COVID-19 Vaccination Among Skilled Nursing Facility Staff: Challenges and Strategies Identified by Administrators.","authors":"Emily A Gadbois, Joan F Brazier, Amy Meehan, Caroline Madrigal, Elizabeth M White, Aseel Rafat, David Grabowski, Renee R Shield","doi":"10.1177/10775587231168435","DOIUrl":"10.1177/10775587231168435","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>COVID-19 vaccinations are critical for mitigating outbreaks and reducing mortality for skilled nursing facility (SNF) residents and staff, yet uptake among SNF staff varies widely and remains suboptimal. Understanding which strategies are successful for promoting staff vaccination, and examining the relationship between vaccination policies and staff retention/turnover is key for identifying best practices. We conducted repeated interviews with SNF administrators at 3-month intervals between July 2020 and December 2021 (<i>n</i> = 156 interviews). We found that COVID-19 vaccines were initially met with both enthusiasm and skepticism by SNF staff. Administrators reported strategies to increase staff vaccine acceptance, including incentives, one-on-one education, and less stringent personal protective equipment requirements. Federal and state vaccination mandates further promoted vaccine uptake. This combination of mandates with prioritization of the vaccine by SNFs and their leadership was successful at increasing staff vaccination acceptance, which may be critical to increase staff booster uptake from its current suboptimal levels.</p>","PeriodicalId":51127,"journal":{"name":"Medical Care Research and Review","volume":" ","pages":"608-618"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10185450/pdf/10.1177_10775587231168435.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9476142","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-12-01Epub Date: 2023-08-04DOI: 10.1177/10775587231191169
Jeah Jung, Roger Feldman, Caroline Carlin
Medicare Advantage (MA) plans increase their risk-adjusted payments through intensive coding in health risk assessments (HRAs) and chart reviews. Whether the additional diagnoses from HRAs and chart reviews are associated with increased resource use is not known. Using national MA encounter data (2016-2019), we examine the relative contributions of three health risk scores to MA resource use: the base risk score that excludes diagnoses from HRAs and chart reviews; the incremental score added to the base score from diagnoses in HRAs; and the incremental score added from diagnoses in chart reviews. We find that the incremental risk scores explain 53.5% to 64.5% of resource use relative to the base risk score effect-that is, 35.5% to 46.5% of the incremental risk scores are not accompanied by increased resource use. While HRAs and chart reviews contribute to more complete coding of diagnoses, they are sources of intensive coding not accompanied by resource use.
{"title":"Coding Intensity Through Health Risk Assessments and Chart Reviews in Medicare Advantage: Does It Explain Resource Use?","authors":"Jeah Jung, Roger Feldman, Caroline Carlin","doi":"10.1177/10775587231191169","DOIUrl":"10.1177/10775587231191169","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Medicare Advantage (MA) plans increase their risk-adjusted payments through intensive coding in health risk assessments (HRAs) and chart reviews. Whether the additional diagnoses from HRAs and chart reviews are associated with increased resource use is not known. Using national MA encounter data (2016-2019), we examine the relative contributions of three health risk scores to MA resource use: the <i>base</i> risk score that excludes diagnoses from HRAs and chart reviews; the <i>incremental</i> score added to the base score from diagnoses in HRAs; and the <i>incremental</i> score added from diagnoses in chart reviews. We find that the incremental risk scores explain 53.5% to 64.5% of resource use relative to the base risk score effect-that is, 35.5% to 46.5% of the incremental risk scores are not accompanied by increased resource use. While HRAs and chart reviews contribute to more complete coding of diagnoses, they are sources of intensive coding not accompanied by resource use.</p>","PeriodicalId":51127,"journal":{"name":"Medical Care Research and Review","volume":" ","pages":"641-647"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9940376","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-12-01Epub Date: 2023-05-16DOI: 10.1177/10775587231170066
Ashley Fox, Frances M Howell, Ellerie Weber, Teresa Janevic
Noncitizen immigrants are often excluded from accessing critical safety-net programs, such as Medicaid. Access to health care plays a central role in current policy debates on maternal health. Yet, immigrant exclusions are rarely considered in maternal health policy research. Through open-ended interviews with 31 policymakers, researchers, and program administrators, we examined state variations in approaches to providing care for pregnant, post, and intrapartum immigrant women. We found four themes: (a) a patchwork safety-net exists that provides some access to immigrants ineligible for Medicaid; (b) patchwork coverage leads to patchwork care, which can contribute to maternal health inequities; (c) immigrant Medicaid policy is assembled along a hierarchy of deservingness based on documentation status; (d) Trump-era public charge rules and political climate may have a substantial chilling effect on benefit uptake regardless of eligibility. We discuss implications for efforts to expand Medicaid postpartum and address the maternal health crisis.
{"title":"Left Behind: Medicaid Immigrant Exclusions and Access to Maternal Health Care Across the Reproductive-Perinatal Continuum.","authors":"Ashley Fox, Frances M Howell, Ellerie Weber, Teresa Janevic","doi":"10.1177/10775587231170066","DOIUrl":"10.1177/10775587231170066","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Noncitizen immigrants are often excluded from accessing critical safety-net programs, such as Medicaid. Access to health care plays a central role in current policy debates on maternal health. Yet, immigrant exclusions are rarely considered in maternal health policy research. Through open-ended interviews with 31 policymakers, researchers, and program administrators, we examined state variations in approaches to providing care for pregnant, post, and intrapartum immigrant women. We found four themes: (a) a patchwork safety-net exists that provides some access to immigrants ineligible for Medicaid; (b) patchwork coverage leads to patchwork care, which can contribute to maternal health inequities; (c) immigrant Medicaid policy is assembled along a hierarchy of deservingness based on documentation status; (d) Trump-era public charge rules and political climate may have a substantial chilling effect on benefit uptake regardless of eligibility. We discuss implications for efforts to expand Medicaid postpartum and address the maternal health crisis.</p>","PeriodicalId":51127,"journal":{"name":"Medical Care Research and Review","volume":" ","pages":"582-595"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9463471","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-10-01Epub Date: 2023-05-13DOI: 10.1177/10775587231170951
Heide Jackson, Katherine Keisler-Starkey
Household surveys are an important source of information on medical spending and burden. We examine how recently implemented post-processing improvements to the Current Population Survey Annual Social and Economic Supplement (CPS ASEC) affected estimates of medical expenditures and medical burden. The revised data extraction and imputation procedures mark the second stage of the CPS ASEC redesign and the beginning of a new time series for studying household medical expenditures. Using data for the calendar year 2017, we find that median family medical expenditures are not statistically different from legacy methods; however, updated processing does significantly reduce the percentage of families estimated to have a high medical burden (medical expenses are at least 10% of family income). The updated processing system also changes the characteristics of families with high medical spending and is primarily driven by changes in imputation of health insurance and medical spending.
{"title":"Out-of-Pocket Medical Expenditures in the Redesigned Current Population Survey: Evaluating Improvements to Data Processing.","authors":"Heide Jackson, Katherine Keisler-Starkey","doi":"10.1177/10775587231170951","DOIUrl":"10.1177/10775587231170951","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Household surveys are an important source of information on medical spending and burden. We examine how recently implemented post-processing improvements to the Current Population Survey Annual Social and Economic Supplement (CPS ASEC) affected estimates of medical expenditures and medical burden. The revised data extraction and imputation procedures mark the second stage of the CPS ASEC redesign and the beginning of a new time series for studying household medical expenditures. Using data for the calendar year 2017, we find that median family medical expenditures are not statistically different from legacy methods; however, updated processing does significantly reduce the percentage of families estimated to have a high medical burden (medical expenses are at least 10% of family income). The updated processing system also changes the characteristics of families with high medical spending and is primarily driven by changes in imputation of health insurance and medical spending.</p>","PeriodicalId":51127,"journal":{"name":"Medical Care Research and Review","volume":"80 5","pages":"548-557"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10524916/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10529711","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-10-01Epub Date: 2023-06-21DOI: 10.1177/10775587231180667
Mara A G Hollander, Alene Kennedy-Hendricks, Cameron Schilling, Mark K Meiselbach, Elizabeth A Stuart, Haiden A Huskamp, Alisa B Busch, Julia C P Eddelbuettel, Colleen L Barry, Matthew D Eisenberg
A high-deductible health plan (HDHP) may incentivize enrollees to limit health care use at the beginning of a plan year, when they are responsible for 100% of costs, or to increase the use of care at the end of the year, when enrollees may have less cost exposure. We investigated both the impact of the deductible reset that occurs at the beginning of a plan year and the option to enroll in an HDHP on the use of substance use disorder (SUD) treatment services over the course of a health plan year. We found decreases in SUD treatment use following the increase in cost exposure related to a deductible reset. There was no variation in this behavior between HDHP offer enrollees and comparison enrollees who were not offered an HDHP. These findings reinforce that cost-sharing poses a barrier to SUD care and continuity of care, which can increase the risk of adverse clinical outcomes.
{"title":"Do High-Deductible Health Plans Incentivize Changing the Timing of Substance Use Disorder Treatment?","authors":"Mara A G Hollander, Alene Kennedy-Hendricks, Cameron Schilling, Mark K Meiselbach, Elizabeth A Stuart, Haiden A Huskamp, Alisa B Busch, Julia C P Eddelbuettel, Colleen L Barry, Matthew D Eisenberg","doi":"10.1177/10775587231180667","DOIUrl":"10.1177/10775587231180667","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A high-deductible health plan (HDHP) may incentivize enrollees to limit health care use at the beginning of a plan year, when they are responsible for 100% of costs, or to increase the use of care at the end of the year, when enrollees may have less cost exposure. We investigated both the impact of the deductible reset that occurs at the beginning of a plan year and the option to enroll in an HDHP on the use of substance use disorder (SUD) treatment services over the course of a health plan year. We found decreases in SUD treatment use following the increase in cost exposure related to a deductible reset. There was no variation in this behavior between HDHP offer enrollees and comparison enrollees who were not offered an HDHP. These findings reinforce that cost-sharing poses a barrier to SUD care and continuity of care, which can increase the risk of adverse clinical outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":51127,"journal":{"name":"Medical Care Research and Review","volume":"80 5","pages":"530-539"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10961140/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10176115","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}