Applied Neuropsychology-Adult最新文献

Neuropsychological rehabilitation plays a critical role in helping those recovering from brain injuries restore cognitive and functional abilities. Artificial Intelligence, with its potential, may revolutionize this field further; therefore, this article explores applications of AI for neuropsychological rehabilitation of patients suffering brain injuries. This study employs a systematic review methodology to comprehensively review existing literature regarding Artificial Intelligence use in neuropsychological rehabilitation for people with brain injuries. The systematic review follows the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A systematic search of electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus, PsycINFO, etc.) showed a total of 212 potentially relevant articles. After removing duplicates and screening titles and abstracts, 186 articles were selected for assessment. Following the assessment, 55 articles met the inclusion criteria and were included in this systematic review. A thematic analysis approach is employed to analyze and synthesize the extracted data. Themes, patterns, and trends are identified across the included studies, allowing for a comprehensive understanding of the applicability of AI in neuropsychological rehabilitation for patients with brain injuries. The identified topics were: AI Applications in Diagnostics of Brain Injuries and their Neuropsychological Repercussions; AI in Personalization and Monitoring of Neuropsychological Rehabilitation for traumatic brain injury (TBI); Leveraging AI for Predicting and Optimizing Neuropsychological Rehabilitation Outcomes in TBI Patients. Based on the review, it was concluded that AI has the potential to enhance neuropsychological rehabilitation for patients with brain injuries. By leveraging AI techniques, personalized rehabilitation programs can be developed, treatment outcomes can be predicted, and interventions can be optimized.

Parkinson's disease (PD) is a neurodegenerative disorder affecting 1% of people older than 60 years. One of the abilities that seems vulnerable to the cognitive impairments associated with PD is financial capability. This explorative study aimed to evaluate the extent and type of problems in financial capability of people with PD without a diagnosis of dementia. Participants were 31 people with PD and 62 matched controls. Participants completed an extensive test-battery, including measures for financial capability and cognitive functioning. Compared to controls, the PD-group performed significantly poorer on two financial competence tasks and showed a comparable performance on the other financial capability measures. For 45% of the PD-group, cognitive test performance was indicative of mild cognitive impairment, yet no significant difference was observed in overall cognitive functioning between the PD and control group. In the total sample, only small or medium correlations were found between financial competence and cognition, and between financial capability and the contextual factors of income and financial experience. The findings suggest that in the earlier stages of PD, when cognitive impairments are relatively mild, some problems may be observed in financial competence, yet other domains of financial capability appear less affected. The absence of strong correlations between financial competence and overall cognitive functioning indicates that standard neuropsychological assessments seem inadequate to make financial capability determinations. By offering insight into the financial capability of people in the milder stages of PD, the findings of the present study may aid in the development and provision of tailored support.

Functional assessment in neurocognitive evaluation is often provided via informant reports. These subjective reports can vary based on the characteristics of informants and their relationships with participants, such as informant sex. However, whether informant sex intersects with participant sex to impact subjective ratings of participants' daily functioning, and whether such effects mirror observed patterns in neuropsychological performance, has not been adequately examined with ethnoracially diverse samples. We examined differences among participant-informant sex-based dyads on subjective informant reports of participants' daily functioning (assessed via the Functional Activities Questionnaire [FAQ]), and whether any observed differences on reported functioning corresponded to differences in objective participant performance on neuropsychological performance, among middle-aged and older Hispanic/Latino (n = 543), non-Hispanic Black (NHB; n = 1030), and non-Hispanic White (NHW; n = 5356) adults in the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center cohort (n = 6929). Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) tests revealed significant dyad differences on FAQ scores in the NHB (p<.001) and NHW subsamples (p<.05), but not in the Hispanic/Latino subsample (p>.05). For the Hispanic/Latino and NHB subsamples, ANCOVA tests revealed no significant effects of dyad on neuropsychological performance (ps>.01), whereas for the NHW subsample, ANCOVA tests revealed significant dyad differences on performance in multiple cognitive domains (ps<.01). Nevertheless, the pattern of dyad differences on neuropsychological performance did not mirror the pattern of observed differences on FAQ scores in the NHW subsample. Findings and their implications, including potential contributions of other informant characteristics on observed dyad differences on reported functioning, are discussed.

Objectives: Cognitive and affective factors have been implicated in verbal fluency (VF) performance in Parkinson's disease (PD). This exploratory study aimed to investigate the relationships between cognitive and affective variables on traditional ("core") and "process" (error and interval) scores of VF and elucidate unique information these scores may provide regarding mechanisms underlying VF.

Methods: Sixty-two PD patients without dementia completed clinical neuropsychological examinations consisting of attention, processing speed, language, executive functioning, visuospatial, memory, and mood measures. Hierarchical regression and negative binomial regression analyses were used to evaluate relationships between outcome and predictor variables.

Results: Generativity results revealed that processing speed and working memory explained up to 34% of the variance of total letter fluency responses (p = <.001) and processing speed explained 24% of the variance for total semantic fluency (p = .003). For category switching generativity, only age predicted 20% of the variance (p = .01). Two executive functioning measures were negatively associated with error production over the duration (b = -.055, p = .028; b = -.062, p = .004) and final 45-second interval (b = -.072, p = .003; b = -.044, p = .033) of the category switching task. In the initial 15-second task interval, a positive predictive relationship between error production and indifference apathy (b = .616, p = .044) was demonstrated.

Conclusions: Findings demonstrate the potential utility of "process" scores in detecting subtle cognitive impairment in Parkinson's disease patients without dementia and tentatively evidence the role of indifference apathy in task initiation.

In this study, we offer a comprehensive assessment of the phenomenological experience of patients with behavioral-variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) upon retrieval of autobiographical memory. We invited patients with bvFTD and control participants to retrieve autobiographical memories and rate, for each memory, its phenomenological characteristics. We also analyzed the retrieved memories regarding specificity (i.e., whether the memory described a general or a detailed event). Results demonstrated that, compared to control participants, patients with bvFTD attributed lower levels of reliving, back in time (feeling as if going back in time), remembering, realness, visual imagery, auditory imagery, language, emotion, rehearsal, importance, spatial recall and temporal recall to their memories. Lower autobiographical specificity was also observed in patients with bvFTD compared to control participants. Autobiographical specificity in patients with bvFTD was associated with verbal fluency and verbal episodic memory, but not with phenomenological experience. Although autobiographical memories of patients with bvFTD show low ratings of phenomenological experience, the patients may still enjoy some limited subjective experience during autobiographical retrieval.

Persons with severe non-fluent aphasia would benefit from using gestures to substitute for their absent powers of speech. The use of gestures, however, is challenging for persons with aphasia and concomitant limb apraxia. Research on the long-term recovery of gestures is scant, and it is unclear whether gesture performance can show recovery over time. This study evaluated the recovery of emblems and tool use pantomimes of persons with severe non-fluent aphasia and limb apraxia after a left hemisphere stroke. The Florida Apraxia Screening Test-Revised (FAST-R) was used for measurements. The test includes 30 gestures to be performed (i) after an oral request, (ii) with the aid of a pictorial cue, or (iii) as an imitation. The gestures were rated on their degree of comprehensibility. The comprehensibility of gestures after an oral request improved significantly in five out of seven participants between the first (1-3 months after the stroke) and the last (3 years after) examination. Improvement continued for all five in the period between six months and three years. The imitation model did improve the comprehensibility of gestures for all participants, whereas the pictorial cue did so just slightly. The skill of producing gestures can improve even in the late phase post-stroke. Because of this potential, we suggest that gesture training should be systematically included in the rehabilitation of communication for persons with severe non-fluent aphasia.

Cognitive impairment and functional limitation are commonly observed in older adults. They have a complex correlation, and both are risk factors for mortality. This prospective cohort study aimed to explore the independent and joint impact of cognitive impairment and functional limitations on all-cause mortality in older adults. A total of 3,759 participants aged ≥ 60 years who had available information on mortality data, cognitive function, physical function, and covariates were enrolled. Cox proportional hazards regression models were employed to assess the independent and joint impacts of cognitive impairment and functional limitation on all-cause mortality. Smoothing curve fitting was used to show the nonlinear relationship between the Digit Symbol Coding (DSC) score and all-cause mortality. An interaction between cognitive impairment and functional limitation was identified when examining their associations with all-cause mortality. Cognitive impairment and functional limitation independently correlated with all-cause mortality risk even after adjusting for covariates and performing mutual adjustments (HR for cognitive impairment: 1.34, 95% CI 1.15-1.56; HR for functional limitation: 1.50, 95% CI 1.32-1.70). When the DSC score was > 18, as the score increased, the risk of death significantly decreased (HR 0.99, 95% CI 0.98-0.99). Participants with both cognitive impairment and functional limitation had the highest hazard ratio for all-cause mortality (HR 1.98, 95%CI 1.63-2.40). In summary, cognitive impairment and functional limitation independently correlated with increased all-cause mortality risk. A higher DSC score was a protective factor reducing the premature mortality risk. Older adults with cognitive impairment and functional limitation demonstrated the highest all-cause mortality risk.

This study compared the neuropsychological performance of two post-stroke groups, one undergoing rehabilitation and the other not receiving any intervention, on the acute and chronic stroke phases, and explored sociodemographic and neurological variables associated with changes in performance over time. Sixty-three adults underwent neuropsychological assessment with the Cognitive Screening Instrument (TRIACOG) less than thirty days after having a stroke and were reassessed three to six months after stroke. Thirty-eight participants did not undertake rehabilitation and twenty-five did physiotherapy and/or speech therapy between the two time points. The frequency of cognitive deficits (between groups) and the range of cognitive assessment scores over time (between and within groups) were analyzed. There was a significant decrease in the frequency of neuropsychological deficits and improvement on neuropsychological assessment scores over time only in the group undergoing rehabilitation. Severity of the neurological condition, years of education and being in rehabilitation explained the longitudinal changes in several cognitive domains measured by TRIACOG. Engaging in rehabilitation within three to six months post-stroke is crucial for enhancing the recovery of neuropsychological deficits. Cognitive screening instruments like TRIACOG can be used by health professionals to identify stroke-related neuropsychological changes and plan interventions.

Objective: The study aimed to carry out a cross-cultural analysis by comparing Five-Point test scores for two different countries. The Five-Point test measures design fluency, an executive function, and is an inexpensive test that makes it more accessible to assessment settings, including under-resourced settings.

Methods: Adults in Argentina (n = 90) and South Africa (n = 90) with tertiary levels of education were tested on the Five-Point Test. ANOVA was applied to compare the scores of the two groups on the total number of unique designs produced (Total Unique Designs).

Results: The study found no significant differences in the Total Unique Designs scores between the two groups (p = .13; η = 0.01). Correlations between demographic variables and the Total Unique Designs scores varied slightly across both samples.

Conclusions: Despite large cultural differences between both samples (language, race, religion, income) scores on this test did not differ significantly. These findings provide initial evidence of scalar equivalence on the test across these samples. Norms for the Five-Point Test Total Unique Designs scores might be used interchangeably between these two highly educated groups from different countries.