首页 > 最新文献

Mmwr Recommendations and Reports最新文献

英文 中文
Community Mitigation Guidelines to Prevent Pandemic Influenza - United States, 2017. 预防大流行性流感的社区缓解指南-美国,2017年。
IF 33.7 1区 医学 Q1 Medicine Pub Date : 2017-04-21 DOI: 10.15585/mmwr.rr6601a1
Noreen Qualls, Alexandra Levitt, Neha Kanade, Narue Wright-Jegede, Stephanie Dopson, Matthew Biggerstaff, Carrie Reed, Amra Uzicanin

When a novel influenza A virus with pandemic potential emerges, nonpharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) often are the most readily available interventions to help slow transmission of the virus in communities, which is especially important before a pandemic vaccine becomes widely available. NPIs, also known as community mitigation measures, are actions that persons and communities can take to help slow the spread of respiratory virus infections, including seasonal and pandemic influenza viruses.These guidelines replace the 2007 Interim Pre-pandemic Planning Guidance: Community Strategy for Pandemic Influenza Mitigation in the United States - Early, Targeted, Layered Use of Nonpharmaceutical Interventions (https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/11425). Several elements remain unchanged from the 2007 guidance, which described recommended NPIs and the supporting rationale and key concepts for the use of these interventions during influenza pandemics. NPIs can be phased in, or layered, on the basis of pandemic severity and local transmission patterns over time. Categories of NPIs include personal protective measures for everyday use (e.g., voluntary home isolation of ill persons, respiratory etiquette, and hand hygiene); personal protective measures reserved for influenza pandemics (e.g., voluntary home quarantine of exposed household members and use of face masks in community settings when ill); community measures aimed at increasing social distancing (e.g., school closures and dismissals, social distancing in workplaces, and postponing or cancelling mass gatherings); and environmental measures (e.g., routine cleaning of frequently touched surfaces).Several new elements have been incorporated into the 2017 guidelines. First, to support updated recommendations on the use of NPIs, the latest scientific evidence available since the influenza A (H1N1)pdm09 pandemic has been added. Second, a summary of lessons learned from the 2009 H1N1 pandemic response is presented to underscore the importance of broad and flexible prepandemic planning. Third, a new section on community engagement has been included to highlight that the timely and effective use of NPIs depends on community acceptance and active participation. Fourth, to provide new or updated pandemic assessment and planning tools, the novel influenza virus pandemic intervals tool, the Influenza Risk Assessment Tool, the Pandemic Severity Assessment Framework, and a set of prepandemic planning scenarios are described. Finally, to facilitate implementation of the updated guidelines and to assist states and localities with prepandemic planning and decision-making, this report links to six supplemental prepandemic NPI planning guides for different community settings that are available online (https://www.cdc.gov/nonpharmaceutical-interventions).

当一种具有大流行潜力的新型甲型流感病毒出现时,非药物干预措施往往是最容易获得的干预措施,有助于减缓病毒在社区中的传播,这在大流行疫苗广泛获得之前尤为重要。国家行动计划,也称为社区缓解措施,是个人和社区可采取的行动,以帮助减缓呼吸道病毒感染的传播,包括季节性和大流行性流感病毒。这些指南取代了2007年《大流行前临时规划指南:美国大流行性流感缓解社区战略——早期、有针对性、分层使用非药物干预措施》(https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/11425)。与2007年指南相比,若干要素保持不变,2007年指南描述了建议的国家行动计划以及在流感大流行期间使用这些干预措施的支持理由和关键概念。国家行动计划可根据大流行的严重程度和当地传播模式逐步实施或分层实施。npi的类别包括日常使用的个人防护措施(例如,患者自愿在家隔离、呼吸礼仪和手卫生);为流感大流行保留的个人防护措施(例如,对受感染的家庭成员进行自愿居家隔离,并在社区环境中患病时佩戴口罩);旨在增加社会距离的社区措施(例如,关闭和解雇学校,在工作场所保持社会距离,推迟或取消大规模集会);环境措施(例如,对经常接触的表面进行常规清洁)。2017年的指南中加入了一些新元素。首先,为了支持关于使用国家行动计划的最新建议,增加了自甲型H1N1流感pdm09大流行以来可获得的最新科学证据。第二,概述了2009年H1N1大流行应对的经验教训,以强调广泛和灵活的大流行前规划的重要性。第三,新增了关于社区参与的章节,以强调及时有效地使用npi取决于社区的接受和积极参与。第四,为了提供新的或更新的大流行评估和规划工具,描述了新型流感病毒大流行间隔工具、流感风险评估工具、大流行严重程度评估框架和一套大流行前规划情景。最后,为了促进实施更新后的准则,并协助各州和地方进行大流行前规划和决策,本报告与网上可获得的适用于不同社区环境的六份大流行前国家自主倡议补充规划指南(https://www.cdc.gov/nonpharmaceutical-interventions)相链接。
{"title":"Community Mitigation Guidelines to Prevent Pandemic Influenza - United States, 2017.","authors":"Noreen Qualls,&nbsp;Alexandra Levitt,&nbsp;Neha Kanade,&nbsp;Narue Wright-Jegede,&nbsp;Stephanie Dopson,&nbsp;Matthew Biggerstaff,&nbsp;Carrie Reed,&nbsp;Amra Uzicanin","doi":"10.15585/mmwr.rr6601a1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.rr6601a1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>When a novel influenza A virus with pandemic potential emerges, nonpharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) often are the most readily available interventions to help slow transmission of the virus in communities, which is especially important before a pandemic vaccine becomes widely available. NPIs, also known as community mitigation measures, are actions that persons and communities can take to help slow the spread of respiratory virus infections, including seasonal and pandemic influenza viruses.These guidelines replace the 2007 Interim Pre-pandemic Planning Guidance: Community Strategy for Pandemic Influenza Mitigation in the United States - Early, Targeted, Layered Use of Nonpharmaceutical Interventions (https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/11425). Several elements remain unchanged from the 2007 guidance, which described recommended NPIs and the supporting rationale and key concepts for the use of these interventions during influenza pandemics. NPIs can be phased in, or layered, on the basis of pandemic severity and local transmission patterns over time. Categories of NPIs include personal protective measures for everyday use (e.g., voluntary home isolation of ill persons, respiratory etiquette, and hand hygiene); personal protective measures reserved for influenza pandemics (e.g., voluntary home quarantine of exposed household members and use of face masks in community settings when ill); community measures aimed at increasing social distancing (e.g., school closures and dismissals, social distancing in workplaces, and postponing or cancelling mass gatherings); and environmental measures (e.g., routine cleaning of frequently touched surfaces).Several new elements have been incorporated into the 2017 guidelines. First, to support updated recommendations on the use of NPIs, the latest scientific evidence available since the influenza A (H1N1)pdm09 pandemic has been added. Second, a summary of lessons learned from the 2009 H1N1 pandemic response is presented to underscore the importance of broad and flexible prepandemic planning. Third, a new section on community engagement has been included to highlight that the timely and effective use of NPIs depends on community acceptance and active participation. Fourth, to provide new or updated pandemic assessment and planning tools, the novel influenza virus pandemic intervals tool, the Influenza Risk Assessment Tool, the Pandemic Severity Assessment Framework, and a set of prepandemic planning scenarios are described. Finally, to facilitate implementation of the updated guidelines and to assist states and localities with prepandemic planning and decision-making, this report links to six supplemental prepandemic NPI planning guides for different community settings that are available online (https://www.cdc.gov/nonpharmaceutical-interventions).</p>","PeriodicalId":51328,"journal":{"name":"Mmwr Recommendations and Reports","volume":"66 1","pages":"1-34"},"PeriodicalIF":33.7,"publicationDate":"2017-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5837128/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"34928440","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 388
Core Elements of Outpatient Antibiotic Stewardship. 门诊抗生素管理的核心要素。
IF 33.7 1区 医学 Q1 Medicine Pub Date : 2016-11-11 DOI: 10.15585/mmwr.rr6506a1
Guillermo V Sanchez, K. Fleming-Dutra, Rebecca Roberts, L. Hicks
The Core Elements of Outpatient Antibiotic Stewardship provides a framework for antibiotic stewardship for outpatient clinicians and facilities that routinely provide antibiotic treatment. This report augments existing guidance for other clinical settings. In 2014 and 2015, respectively, CDC released the Core Elements of Hospital Antibiotic Stewardship Programs and the Core Elements of Antibiotic Stewardship for Nursing Homes. Antibiotic stewardship is the effort to measure and improve how antibiotics are prescribed by clinicians and used by patients. Improving antibiotic prescribing involves implementing effective strategies to modify prescribing practices to align them with evidence-based recommendations for diagnosis and management. The four core elements of outpatient antibiotic stewardship are commitment, action for policy and practice, tracking and reporting, and education and expertise. Outpatient clinicians and facility leaders can commit to improving antibiotic prescribing and take action by implementing at least one policy or practice aimed at improving antibiotic prescribing practices. Clinicians and leaders of outpatient clinics and health care systems can track antibiotic prescribing practices and regularly report these data back to clinicians. Clinicians can provide educational resources to patients and families on appropriate antibiotic use. Finally, leaders of outpatient clinics and health systems can provide clinicians with education aimed at improving antibiotic prescribing and with access to persons with expertise in antibiotic stewardship. Establishing effective antibiotic stewardship interventions can protect patients and improve clinical outcomes in outpatient health care settings.
门诊抗生素管理的核心要素为门诊临床医生和常规提供抗生素治疗的设施提供了抗生素管理框架。本报告补充了其他临床环境的现有指南。2014年和2015年,CDC分别发布了《医院抗生素管理核心要素》和《养老院抗生素管理核心要素》。抗生素管理是衡量和改进临床医生如何开抗生素处方和患者如何使用抗生素的努力。改进抗生素处方涉及实施有效战略,修改处方做法,使其与基于证据的诊断和管理建议保持一致。门诊抗生素管理的四个核心要素是承诺、政策和实践行动、跟踪和报告以及教育和专业知识。门诊医生和机构领导可以致力于改善抗生素处方,并通过实施至少一项旨在改善抗生素处方实践的政策或实践来采取行动。临床医生和门诊诊所和卫生保健系统的负责人可以跟踪抗生素处方做法,并定期向临床医生报告这些数据。临床医生可以为患者和家属提供适当使用抗生素的教育资源。最后,门诊诊所和卫生系统的负责人可以向临床医生提供旨在改进抗生素处方的教育,并让他们有机会接触到具有抗生素管理专业知识的人员。建立有效的抗生素管理干预措施可以保护患者,改善门诊医疗机构的临床结果。
{"title":"Core Elements of Outpatient Antibiotic Stewardship.","authors":"Guillermo V Sanchez, K. Fleming-Dutra, Rebecca Roberts, L. Hicks","doi":"10.15585/mmwr.rr6506a1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.rr6506a1","url":null,"abstract":"The Core Elements of Outpatient Antibiotic Stewardship provides a framework for antibiotic stewardship for outpatient clinicians and facilities that routinely provide antibiotic treatment. This report augments existing guidance for other clinical settings. In 2014 and 2015, respectively, CDC released the Core Elements of Hospital Antibiotic Stewardship Programs and the Core Elements of Antibiotic Stewardship for Nursing Homes. Antibiotic stewardship is the effort to measure and improve how antibiotics are prescribed by clinicians and used by patients. Improving antibiotic prescribing involves implementing effective strategies to modify prescribing practices to align them with evidence-based recommendations for diagnosis and management. The four core elements of outpatient antibiotic stewardship are commitment, action for policy and practice, tracking and reporting, and education and expertise. Outpatient clinicians and facility leaders can commit to improving antibiotic prescribing and take action by implementing at least one policy or practice aimed at improving antibiotic prescribing practices. Clinicians and leaders of outpatient clinics and health care systems can track antibiotic prescribing practices and regularly report these data back to clinicians. Clinicians can provide educational resources to patients and families on appropriate antibiotic use. Finally, leaders of outpatient clinics and health systems can provide clinicians with education aimed at improving antibiotic prescribing and with access to persons with expertise in antibiotic stewardship. Establishing effective antibiotic stewardship interventions can protect patients and improve clinical outcomes in outpatient health care settings.","PeriodicalId":51328,"journal":{"name":"Mmwr Recommendations and Reports","volume":"38 1","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":33.7,"publicationDate":"2016-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"80152508","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 435
Prevention and Control of Seasonal Influenza with Vaccines. 用疫苗预防和控制季节性流感。
IF 33.7 1区 医学 Q1 Medicine Pub Date : 2016-08-26 DOI: 10.15585/mmwr.rr6505a1
Lisa A Grohskopf, Leslie Z Sokolow, Karen R Broder, Sonja J Olsen, Ruth A Karron, Daniel B Jernigan, Joseph S Bresee

This report updates the 2015-16 recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) regarding the use of seasonal influenza vaccines (Grohskopf LA, Sokolow LZ, Olsen SJ, Bresee JS, Broder KR, Karron RA. Prevention and control of influenza with vaccines: recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, United States, 2015-16 influenza season. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2015;64:818-25). Routine annual influenza vaccination is recommended for all persons aged ≥6 months who do not have contraindications. For the 2016-17 influenza season, inactivated influenza vaccines (IIVs) will be available in both trivalent (IIV3) and quadrivalent (IIV4) formulations. Recombinant influenza vaccine (RIV) will be available in a trivalent formulation (RIV3). In light of concerns regarding low effectiveness against influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 in the United States during the 2013-14 and 2015-16 seasons, for the 2016-17 season, ACIP makes the interim recommendation that live attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV4) should not be used. Vaccine virus strains included in the 2016-17 U.S. trivalent influenza vaccines will be an A/California/7/2009 (H1N1)-like virus, an A/Hong Kong/4801/2014 (H3N2)-like virus, and a B/Brisbane/60/2008-like virus (Victoria lineage). Quadrivalent vaccines will include an additional influenza B virus strain, a B/Phuket/3073/2013-like virus (Yamagata lineage).Recommendations for use of different vaccine types and specific populations are discussed. A licensed, age-appropriate vaccine should be used. No preferential recommendation is made for one influenza vaccine product over another for persons for whom more than one licensed, recommended product is otherwise appropriate. This information is intended for vaccination providers, immunization program personnel, and public health personnel. Information in this report reflects discussions during public meetings of ACIP held on October 21, 2015; February 24, 2016; and June 22, 2016. These recommendations apply to all licensed influenza vaccines used within Food and Drug Administration-licensed indications, including those licensed after the publication date of this report. Updates and other information are available at CDC's influenza website (http://www.cdc.gov/flu). Vaccination and health care providers should check CDC's influenza website periodically for additional information.

本报告更新了免疫实践咨询委员会(ACIP)关于使用季节性流感疫苗的2015-16年建议(Grohskopf LA, Sokolow LZ, Olsen SJ, Bresee JS, Broder KR, Karron RA)。用疫苗预防和控制流感:免疫实践咨询委员会的建议,美国,2015-16流感季节。MMWR Morb Mortal wweekly Rep 2015;64:818-25)。建议所有年龄≥6个月且无禁忌症的人每年常规接种流感疫苗。在2016- 2017年流感季节,灭活疫苗(IIVs)将有三价(IIV3)和四价(IIV4)两种剂型。重组流感疫苗(RIV)将以三价制剂(RIV3)提供。鉴于美国在2013-14和2015-16流感季对甲型H1N1流感pdm09的有效性较低,在2016-17流感季,ACIP提出临时建议,不应使用流感减毒活疫苗(lai4)。2016-17年美国三价流感疫苗中的疫苗病毒株将是A/California/7/2009 (H1N1)样病毒、A/Hong Kong/4801/2014 (H3N2)样病毒和B/Brisbane/60/2008样病毒(Victoria谱系)。四价疫苗将包括一种额外的B型流感病毒毒株,即B/Phuket/3073/2013样病毒(山形谱系)。讨论了使用不同疫苗类型和特定人群的建议。应使用许可的、适合年龄的疫苗。对于那些在其他方面适合使用一种以上许可推荐产品的人,没有对一种流感疫苗产品作出优先推荐。本信息适用于疫苗接种提供者、免疫规划人员和公共卫生人员。本报告中的信息反映了ACIP于2015年10月21日举行的公开会议上的讨论;2016年2月24日;2016年6月22日。这些建议适用于在食品和药物管理局许可适应症中使用的所有许可流感疫苗,包括在本报告发布之日之后许可的流感疫苗。最新情况和其他信息可在疾病预防控制中心流感网站(http://www.cdc.gov/flu)获得。疫苗接种和卫生保健提供者应定期查看疾病预防控制中心的流感网站,以获取更多信息。
{"title":"Prevention and Control of Seasonal Influenza with Vaccines.","authors":"Lisa A Grohskopf,&nbsp;Leslie Z Sokolow,&nbsp;Karen R Broder,&nbsp;Sonja J Olsen,&nbsp;Ruth A Karron,&nbsp;Daniel B Jernigan,&nbsp;Joseph S Bresee","doi":"10.15585/mmwr.rr6505a1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.rr6505a1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This report updates the 2015-16 recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) regarding the use of seasonal influenza vaccines (Grohskopf LA, Sokolow LZ, Olsen SJ, Bresee JS, Broder KR, Karron RA. Prevention and control of influenza with vaccines: recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, United States, 2015-16 influenza season. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2015;64:818-25). Routine annual influenza vaccination is recommended for all persons aged ≥6 months who do not have contraindications. For the 2016-17 influenza season, inactivated influenza vaccines (IIVs) will be available in both trivalent (IIV3) and quadrivalent (IIV4) formulations. Recombinant influenza vaccine (RIV) will be available in a trivalent formulation (RIV3). In light of concerns regarding low effectiveness against influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 in the United States during the 2013-14 and 2015-16 seasons, for the 2016-17 season, ACIP makes the interim recommendation that live attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV4) should not be used. Vaccine virus strains included in the 2016-17 U.S. trivalent influenza vaccines will be an A/California/7/2009 (H1N1)-like virus, an A/Hong Kong/4801/2014 (H3N2)-like virus, and a B/Brisbane/60/2008-like virus (Victoria lineage). Quadrivalent vaccines will include an additional influenza B virus strain, a B/Phuket/3073/2013-like virus (Yamagata lineage).Recommendations for use of different vaccine types and specific populations are discussed. A licensed, age-appropriate vaccine should be used. No preferential recommendation is made for one influenza vaccine product over another for persons for whom more than one licensed, recommended product is otherwise appropriate. This information is intended for vaccination providers, immunization program personnel, and public health personnel. Information in this report reflects discussions during public meetings of ACIP held on October 21, 2015; February 24, 2016; and June 22, 2016. These recommendations apply to all licensed influenza vaccines used within Food and Drug Administration-licensed indications, including those licensed after the publication date of this report. Updates and other information are available at CDC's influenza website (http://www.cdc.gov/flu). Vaccination and health care providers should check CDC's influenza website periodically for additional information. </p>","PeriodicalId":51328,"journal":{"name":"Mmwr Recommendations and Reports","volume":"65 5","pages":"1-54"},"PeriodicalIF":33.7,"publicationDate":"2016-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"34336011","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 493
U.S. Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use, 2016. 美国医疗避孕使用资格标准,2016年。
IF 33.7 1区 医学 Q1 Medicine Pub Date : 2016-07-29 DOI: 10.15585/mmwr.rr6503a1
Kathryn M Curtis, Naomi K Tepper, Tara C Jatlaoui, Erin Berry-Bibee, Leah G Horton, Lauren B Zapata, Katharine B Simmons, H Pamela Pagano, Denise J Jamieson, Maura K Whiteman

The 2016 U.S. Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use (U.S. MEC) comprises recommendations for the use of specific contraceptive methods by women and men who have certain characteristics or medical conditions. These recommendations for health care providers were updated by CDC after review of the scientific evidence and consultation with national experts who met in Atlanta, Georgia, during August 26-28, 2015. The information in this report updates the 2010 U.S. MEC (CDC. U.S. medical eligibility criteria for contraceptive use, 2010. MMWR 2010:59 [No. RR-4]). Notable updates include the addition of recommendations for women with cystic fibrosis, women with multiple sclerosis, and women receiving certain psychotropic drugs or St. John's wort; revisions to the recommendations for emergency contraception, including the addition of ulipristal acetate; and revisions to the recommendations for postpartum women; women who are breastfeeding; women with known dyslipidemias, migraine headaches, superficial venous disease, gestational trophoblastic disease, sexually transmitted diseases, and human immunodeficiency virus; and women who are receiving antiretroviral therapy. The recommendations in this report are intended to assist health care providers when they counsel women, men, and couples about contraceptive method choice. Although these recommendations are meant to serve as a source of clinical guidance, health care providers should always consider the individual clinical circumstances of each person seeking family planning services. This report is not intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice for individual patients. Persons should seek advice from their health care providers when considering family planning options.

2016年美国医疗避孕使用资格标准(U.S. MEC)包括对具有某些特征或医疗条件的女性和男性使用特定避孕方法的建议。2015年8月26日至28日期间,美国疾病控制与预防中心在审查了科学证据并咨询了在佐治亚州亚特兰大举行会议的国家专家后,对卫生保健提供者的这些建议进行了更新。本报告中的信息更新了2010年美国MEC (CDC)。2010年美国避孕药具使用医疗资格标准。MMWR 2010:59 [No.]RR-4])。值得注意的更新包括增加了囊性纤维化妇女、多发性硬化症妇女和接受某些精神药物或圣约翰草的妇女的建议;对紧急避孕建议的修订,包括添加醋酸乌普利司酮;以及对产后妇女的建议的修订;母乳喂养的妇女;已知患有血脂异常、偏头痛、浅静脉疾病、妊娠滋养层疾病、性传播疾病和人类免疫缺陷病毒的妇女;以及接受抗逆转录病毒治疗的妇女。本报告中的建议旨在帮助卫生保健提供者就避孕方法的选择向妇女、男子和夫妇提供咨询。虽然这些建议旨在作为临床指导的来源,但卫生保健提供者应始终考虑每个寻求计划生育服务的人的个人临床情况。本报告无意取代个别患者的专业医疗建议。人们在考虑计划生育选择时,应向其保健提供者征求意见。
{"title":"U.S. Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use, 2016.","authors":"Kathryn M Curtis,&nbsp;Naomi K Tepper,&nbsp;Tara C Jatlaoui,&nbsp;Erin Berry-Bibee,&nbsp;Leah G Horton,&nbsp;Lauren B Zapata,&nbsp;Katharine B Simmons,&nbsp;H Pamela Pagano,&nbsp;Denise J Jamieson,&nbsp;Maura K Whiteman","doi":"10.15585/mmwr.rr6503a1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.rr6503a1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The 2016 U.S. Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use (U.S. MEC) comprises recommendations for the use of specific contraceptive methods by women and men who have certain characteristics or medical conditions. These recommendations for health care providers were updated by CDC after review of the scientific evidence and consultation with national experts who met in Atlanta, Georgia, during August 26-28, 2015. The information in this report updates the 2010 U.S. MEC (CDC. U.S. medical eligibility criteria for contraceptive use, 2010. MMWR 2010:59 [No. RR-4]). Notable updates include the addition of recommendations for women with cystic fibrosis, women with multiple sclerosis, and women receiving certain psychotropic drugs or St. John's wort; revisions to the recommendations for emergency contraception, including the addition of ulipristal acetate; and revisions to the recommendations for postpartum women; women who are breastfeeding; women with known dyslipidemias, migraine headaches, superficial venous disease, gestational trophoblastic disease, sexually transmitted diseases, and human immunodeficiency virus; and women who are receiving antiretroviral therapy. The recommendations in this report are intended to assist health care providers when they counsel women, men, and couples about contraceptive method choice. Although these recommendations are meant to serve as a source of clinical guidance, health care providers should always consider the individual clinical circumstances of each person seeking family planning services. This report is not intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice for individual patients. Persons should seek advice from their health care providers when considering family planning options.</p>","PeriodicalId":51328,"journal":{"name":"Mmwr Recommendations and Reports","volume":"65 3","pages":"1-103"},"PeriodicalIF":33.7,"publicationDate":"2016-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"34710551","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 762
U.S. Selected Practice Recommendations for Contraceptive Use, 2016. 美国避孕药具使用选择实践建议,2016年。
IF 33.7 1区 医学 Q1 Medicine Pub Date : 2016-07-29 DOI: 10.15585/mmwr.rr6504a1
Kathryn M Curtis, Tara C Jatlaoui, Naomi K Tepper, Lauren B Zapata, Leah G Horton, Denise J Jamieson, Maura K Whiteman

The 2016 U.S. Selected Practice Recommendations for Contraceptive Use (U.S. SPR) addresses a select group of common, yet sometimes controversial or complex, issues regarding initiation and use of specific contraceptive methods. These recommendations for health care providers were updated by CDC after review of the scientific evidence and consultation with national experts who met in Atlanta, Georgia, during August 26-28, 2015. The information in this report updates the 2013 U.S. SPR (CDC. U.S. selected practice recommendations for contraceptive use, 2013. MMWR 2013;62[No. RR-5]). Major updates include 1) revised recommendations for starting regular contraception after the use of emergency contraceptive pills and 2) new recommendations for the use of medications to ease insertion of intrauterine devices. The recommendations in this report are intended to serve as a source of clinical guidance for health care providers and provide evidence-based guidance to reduce medical barriers to contraception access and use. Health care providers should always consider the individual clinical circumstances of each person seeking family planning services. This report is not intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice for individual patients. Persons should seek advice from their health care providers when considering family planning options.

2016年美国避孕使用选择实践建议(U.S. SPR)解决了一组关于启动和使用特定避孕方法的常见但有时有争议或复杂的问题。2015年8月26日至28日期间,美国疾病控制与预防中心在审查了科学证据并咨询了在佐治亚州亚特兰大举行会议的国家专家后,对卫生保健提供者的这些建议进行了更新。本报告中的信息更新了2013年美国SPR (CDC)。美国选择的做法建议避孕使用,2013年。MMWR 2013; 62(没有。RR-5])。主要更新内容包括:1)修订了使用紧急避孕药后开始定期避孕的建议;2)使用药物以减轻宫内节育器插入的新建议。本报告中的建议旨在为卫生保健提供者提供临床指导,并提供基于证据的指导,以减少获取和使用避孕药具的医疗障碍。卫生保健提供者应始终考虑每个寻求计划生育服务的人的个人临床情况。本报告无意取代个别患者的专业医疗建议。人们在考虑计划生育选择时,应向其保健提供者征求意见。
{"title":"U.S. Selected Practice Recommendations for Contraceptive Use, 2016.","authors":"Kathryn M Curtis,&nbsp;Tara C Jatlaoui,&nbsp;Naomi K Tepper,&nbsp;Lauren B Zapata,&nbsp;Leah G Horton,&nbsp;Denise J Jamieson,&nbsp;Maura K Whiteman","doi":"10.15585/mmwr.rr6504a1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.rr6504a1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The 2016 U.S. Selected Practice Recommendations for Contraceptive Use (U.S. SPR) addresses a select group of common, yet sometimes controversial or complex, issues regarding initiation and use of specific contraceptive methods. These recommendations for health care providers were updated by CDC after review of the scientific evidence and consultation with national experts who met in Atlanta, Georgia, during August 26-28, 2015. The information in this report updates the 2013 U.S. SPR (CDC. U.S. selected practice recommendations for contraceptive use, 2013. MMWR 2013;62[No. RR-5]). Major updates include 1) revised recommendations for starting regular contraception after the use of emergency contraceptive pills and 2) new recommendations for the use of medications to ease insertion of intrauterine devices. The recommendations in this report are intended to serve as a source of clinical guidance for health care providers and provide evidence-based guidance to reduce medical barriers to contraception access and use. Health care providers should always consider the individual clinical circumstances of each person seeking family planning services. This report is not intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice for individual patients. Persons should seek advice from their health care providers when considering family planning options.</p>","PeriodicalId":51328,"journal":{"name":"Mmwr Recommendations and Reports","volume":"65 4","pages":"1-66"},"PeriodicalIF":33.7,"publicationDate":"2016-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"34601613","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 569
Diagnosis and Management of Tickborne Rickettsial Diseases: Rocky Mountain Spotted Fever and Other Spotted Fever Group Rickettsioses, Ehrlichioses, and Anaplasmosis - United States. 蜱传立克次体疾病的诊断和管理:落基山斑疹热和其他斑疹热组立克次体病,埃利希体病和无形体病-美国。
IF 33.7 1区 医学 Q1 Medicine Pub Date : 2016-05-13 DOI: 10.15585/mmwr.rr6502a1
Holly M Biggs, Casey Barton Behravesh, Kristy K Bradley, F Scott Dahlgren, Naomi A Drexler, J Stephen Dumler, Scott M Folk, Cecilia Y Kato, R Ryan Lash, Michael L Levin, Robert F Massung, Robert B Nadelman, William L Nicholson, Christopher D Paddock, Bobbi S Pritt, Marc S Traeger

Tickborne rickettsial diseases continue to cause severe illness and death in otherwise healthy adults and children, despite the availability of low-cost, effective antibacterial therapy. Recognition early in the clinical course is critical because this is the period when antibacterial therapy is most effective. Early signs and symptoms of these illnesses are nonspecific or mimic other illnesses, which can make diagnosis challenging. Previously undescribed tickborne rickettsial diseases continue to be recognized, and since 2004, three additional agents have been described as causes of human disease in the United States: Rickettsia parkeri, Ehrlichia muris-like agent, and Rickettsia species 364D. This report updates the 2006 CDC recommendations on the diagnosis and management of tickborne rickettsial diseases in the United States and includes information on the practical aspects of epidemiology, clinical assessment, treatment, laboratory diagnosis, and prevention of tickborne rickettsial diseases. The CDC Rickettsial Zoonoses Branch, in consultation with external clinical and academic specialists and public health professionals, developed this report to assist health care providers and public health professionals to 1) recognize key epidemiologic features and clinical manifestations of tickborne rickettsial diseases, 2) recognize that doxycycline is the treatment of choice for suspected tickborne rickettsial diseases in adults and children, 3) understand that early empiric antibacterial therapy can prevent severe disease and death, 4) request the appropriate confirmatory diagnostic tests and understand their usefulness and limitations, and 5) report probable and confirmed cases of tickborne rickettsial diseases to public health authorities.

尽管有低成本、有效的抗菌治疗,但蜱传立克次体病继续在健康的成人和儿童中造成严重疾病和死亡。在临床过程的早期识别是至关重要的,因为这是抗菌治疗最有效的时期。这些疾病的早期体征和症状是非特异性的或类似于其他疾病,这可能使诊断具有挑战性。以前未被描述的蜱传立克次体疾病继续得到确认,自2004年以来,在美国又有三种病原体被描述为人类疾病的原因:白氏立克次体、默氏埃利希体样病原体和立克次体364D种。本报告更新了2006年美国疾病预防控制中心关于蜱传立克次体疾病诊断和管理的建议,并包括有关流行病学、临床评估、治疗、实验室诊断和预防蜱传立克次体疾病的实际方面的信息。疾病预防控制中心立克次体人患科与外部临床和学术专家以及公共卫生专业人员协商后,制定了本报告,以协助卫生保健提供者和公共卫生专业人员:1)认识到蜱传立克次体病的主要流行病学特征和临床表现;2)认识到多西环素是成人和儿童疑似蜱传立克次体病的首选治疗方法;3)了解早期经验性抗菌治疗可预防严重疾病和死亡,4)要求进行适当的确诊性诊断测试,并了解其有效性和局限性,5)向公共卫生当局报告可能和确诊的蜱传立克次体病病例。
{"title":"Diagnosis and Management of Tickborne Rickettsial Diseases: Rocky Mountain Spotted Fever and Other Spotted Fever Group Rickettsioses, Ehrlichioses, and Anaplasmosis - United States.","authors":"Holly M Biggs,&nbsp;Casey Barton Behravesh,&nbsp;Kristy K Bradley,&nbsp;F Scott Dahlgren,&nbsp;Naomi A Drexler,&nbsp;J Stephen Dumler,&nbsp;Scott M Folk,&nbsp;Cecilia Y Kato,&nbsp;R Ryan Lash,&nbsp;Michael L Levin,&nbsp;Robert F Massung,&nbsp;Robert B Nadelman,&nbsp;William L Nicholson,&nbsp;Christopher D Paddock,&nbsp;Bobbi S Pritt,&nbsp;Marc S Traeger","doi":"10.15585/mmwr.rr6502a1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.rr6502a1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Tickborne rickettsial diseases continue to cause severe illness and death in otherwise healthy adults and children, despite the availability of low-cost, effective antibacterial therapy. Recognition early in the clinical course is critical because this is the period when antibacterial therapy is most effective. Early signs and symptoms of these illnesses are nonspecific or mimic other illnesses, which can make diagnosis challenging. Previously undescribed tickborne rickettsial diseases continue to be recognized, and since 2004, three additional agents have been described as causes of human disease in the United States: Rickettsia parkeri, Ehrlichia muris-like agent, and Rickettsia species 364D. This report updates the 2006 CDC recommendations on the diagnosis and management of tickborne rickettsial diseases in the United States and includes information on the practical aspects of epidemiology, clinical assessment, treatment, laboratory diagnosis, and prevention of tickborne rickettsial diseases. The CDC Rickettsial Zoonoses Branch, in consultation with external clinical and academic specialists and public health professionals, developed this report to assist health care providers and public health professionals to 1) recognize key epidemiologic features and clinical manifestations of tickborne rickettsial diseases, 2) recognize that doxycycline is the treatment of choice for suspected tickborne rickettsial diseases in adults and children, 3) understand that early empiric antibacterial therapy can prevent severe disease and death, 4) request the appropriate confirmatory diagnostic tests and understand their usefulness and limitations, and 5) report probable and confirmed cases of tickborne rickettsial diseases to public health authorities. </p>","PeriodicalId":51328,"journal":{"name":"Mmwr Recommendations and Reports","volume":"65 2","pages":"1-44"},"PeriodicalIF":33.7,"publicationDate":"2016-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"34542050","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 349
CDC Guideline for Prescribing Opioids for Chronic Pain - United States, 2016. 美国CDC阿片类药物慢性疼痛处方指南,2016年。
IF 33.7 1区 医学 Q1 Medicine Pub Date : 2016-03-18 DOI: 10.15585/mmwr.rr6501e1
D. Dowell, Tamara M. Haegerich, R. Chou
This guideline provides recommendations for primary care clinicians who are prescribing opioids for chronic pain outside of active cancer treatment, palliative care, and end-of-life care. The guideline addresses 1) when to initiate or continue opioids for chronic pain; 2) opioid selection, dosage, duration, follow-up, and discontinuation; and 3) assessing risk and addressing harms of opioid use. CDC developed the guideline using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) framework, and recommendations are made on the basis of a systematic review of the scientific evidence while considering benefits and harms, values and preferences, and resource allocation. CDC obtained input from experts, stakeholders, the public, peer reviewers, and a federally chartered advisory committee. It is important that patients receive appropriate pain treatment with careful consideration of the benefits and risks of treatment options. This guideline is intended to improve communication between clinicians and patients about the risks and benefits of opioid therapy for chronic pain, improve the safety and effectiveness of pain treatment, and reduce the risks associated with long-term opioid therapy, including opioid use disorder, overdose, and death. CDC has provided a checklist for prescribing opioids for chronic pain (http://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/38025) as well as a website (http://www.cdc.gov/drugoverdose/prescribingresources.html) with additional tools to guide clinicians in implementing the recommendations.
本指南为在积极的癌症治疗、姑息治疗和临终关怀之外处方阿片类药物治疗慢性疼痛的初级保健临床医生提供了建议。该指南涉及1)何时开始或继续使用阿片类药物治疗慢性疼痛;2)阿片类药物的选择、剂量、持续时间、随访和停药;3)评估阿片类药物使用的风险和解决危害。CDC使用分级建议评估、发展和评估(GRADE)框架制定了指南,并在考虑益处和危害、价值和偏好以及资源分配的基础上对科学证据进行了系统审查。疾病预防控制中心从专家、利益相关者、公众、同行审稿人和联邦特许咨询委员会获得了意见。重要的是,患者接受适当的疼痛治疗,仔细考虑治疗方案的益处和风险。本指南旨在改善临床医生和患者之间关于阿片类药物治疗慢性疼痛的风险和益处的沟通,提高疼痛治疗的安全性和有效性,并降低与长期阿片类药物治疗相关的风险,包括阿片类药物使用障碍、过量和死亡。疾病预防控制中心提供了一份处方阿片类药物治疗慢性疼痛的清单(http://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/38025)以及一个网站(http://www.cdc.gov/drugoverdose/prescribingresources.html),其中包含指导临床医生实施建议的其他工具。
{"title":"CDC Guideline for Prescribing Opioids for Chronic Pain - United States, 2016.","authors":"D. Dowell, Tamara M. Haegerich, R. Chou","doi":"10.15585/mmwr.rr6501e1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.rr6501e1","url":null,"abstract":"This guideline provides recommendations for primary care clinicians who are prescribing opioids for chronic pain outside of active cancer treatment, palliative care, and end-of-life care. The guideline addresses 1) when to initiate or continue opioids for chronic pain; 2) opioid selection, dosage, duration, follow-up, and discontinuation; and 3) assessing risk and addressing harms of opioid use. CDC developed the guideline using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) framework, and recommendations are made on the basis of a systematic review of the scientific evidence while considering benefits and harms, values and preferences, and resource allocation. CDC obtained input from experts, stakeholders, the public, peer reviewers, and a federally chartered advisory committee. It is important that patients receive appropriate pain treatment with careful consideration of the benefits and risks of treatment options. This guideline is intended to improve communication between clinicians and patients about the risks and benefits of opioid therapy for chronic pain, improve the safety and effectiveness of pain treatment, and reduce the risks associated with long-term opioid therapy, including opioid use disorder, overdose, and death. CDC has provided a checklist for prescribing opioids for chronic pain (http://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/38025) as well as a website (http://www.cdc.gov/drugoverdose/prescribingresources.html) with additional tools to guide clinicians in implementing the recommendations.","PeriodicalId":51328,"journal":{"name":"Mmwr Recommendations and Reports","volume":"48 1","pages":"1-49"},"PeriodicalIF":33.7,"publicationDate":"2016-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"88552426","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 833
CDC Guideline for Prescribing Opioids for Chronic Pain — United States, 2016 美国CDC阿片类药物慢性疼痛处方指南,2016年
IF 33.7 1区 医学 Q1 Medicine Pub Date : 2016-03-15 DOI: 10.15585/mmwr.rr6501e1er
Deborah Dowell,Tamara M. Haegerich,Roger Chou
{"title":"CDC Guideline for Prescribing Opioids for Chronic Pain — United States, 2016","authors":"Deborah Dowell,Tamara M. Haegerich,Roger Chou","doi":"10.15585/mmwr.rr6501e1er","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.rr6501e1er","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":51328,"journal":{"name":"Mmwr Recommendations and Reports","volume":"83 ","pages":"1-49"},"PeriodicalIF":33.7,"publicationDate":"2016-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138506754","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Clinical Framework and Medical Countermeasure Use During an Anthrax Mass-Casualty Incident. 炭疽大规模伤亡事件的临床框架及医疗对策应用
IF 33.7 1区 医学 Q1 Medicine Pub Date : 2015-12-04 DOI: 10.15585/mmwr.rr6404a1
W. Bower, K. Hendricks, Satish K. Pillai, Julie T Guarnizo, D. Meaney-Delman
In 2014, CDC published updated guidelines for the prevention and treatment of anthrax (Hendricks KA, Wright ME, Shadomy SV, et al. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention expert panel meetings on prevention and treatment of anthrax in adults. Emerg Infect Dis 2014;20[2]. Available at http://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/20/2/13-0687_article.htm). These guidelines provided recommended best practices for the diagnosis and treatment of persons with naturally occurring or bioterrorism-related anthrax in conventional medical settings. An aerosolized release of Bacillus anthracis spores over densely populated areas could become a mass-casualty incident. To prepare for this possibility, the U.S. government has stockpiled equipment and therapeutics (known as medical countermeasures [MCMs]) for anthrax prevention and treatment. However, previously developed, publicly available clinical recommendations have not addressed the use of MCMs or clinical management during an anthrax mass-casualty incident, when the number of patients is likely to exceed the ability of the health care infrastructure to provide conventional standards of care and supplies of MCMs might be inadequate to meet the demand required. To address this gap, in 2013, CDC conducted a series of systematic reviews of the scientific literature on anthrax to identify evidence that could help clinicians and public health authorities set guidelines for intravenous antimicrobial and antitoxin use, diagnosis of anthrax meningitis, and management of common anthrax-specific complications in the setting of a mass-casualty incident. Evidence from these reviews was presented to professionals with expertise in anthrax, critical care, and disaster medicine during a series of workgroup meetings that were held from August 2013 through March 2014. In March 2014, a meeting was held at which 102 subject matter experts discussed the evidence and adapted the existing best practices guidance to a clinical use framework for the judicious, efficient, and rational use of stockpiled MCMs for the treatment of anthrax during a mass-casualty incident, which is described in this report. This report addresses elements of hospital-based acute care, specifically antitoxins and intravenous antimicrobial use, and the diagnosis and management of common anthrax-specific complications during a mass-casualty incident. The recommendations in this report should be implemented only after predefined triggers have been met for shifting from conventional to contingency or crisis standards of care, such as when the magnitude of cases might lead to impending shortages of intravenous antimicrobials, antitoxins, critical care resources (e.g., chest tubes and chest drainage systems), or diagnostic capability. This guidance does not address primary triage decisions, anthrax postexposure prophylaxis, hospital bed or workforce surge capacity, or the logistics of dispensing MCMs. Clinicians, hospital administrators, state and local health official
2014年,疾病预防控制中心发布了最新的炭疽热预防和治疗指南(Hendricks KA, Wright ME, Shadomy SV等)。疾病控制和预防中心专家小组会议,讨论成人炭疽的预防和治疗。传染病杂志,2014;20[2]。网址:http://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/20/2/13-0687_article.htm)。这些准则为在常规医疗环境中诊断和治疗自然发生的炭疽或与生物恐怖主义有关的炭疽提供了推荐的最佳做法。炭疽芽孢杆菌孢子在人口稠密地区的雾化释放可能成为大规模伤亡事件。为了应对这种可能性,美国政府储备了预防和治疗炭疽热的设备和治疗药物(被称为医疗对策[mcm])。然而,以前制定的、可公开获得的临床建议并没有涉及在炭疽大规模伤亡事件中使用mcm或临床管理的问题,因为在这种情况下,患者人数可能超过卫生保健基础设施提供常规标准护理的能力,而mcm的供应可能不足以满足所需的需求。为了弥补这一差距,2013年,疾病预防控制中心对有关炭疽的科学文献进行了一系列系统审查,以确定证据,帮助临床医生和公共卫生当局制定静脉注射抗菌素和抗毒素使用指南,诊断炭疽性脑膜炎,以及在发生大规模伤亡事件时处理常见炭疽特异性并发症。在2013年8月至2014年3月举行的一系列工作组会议上,这些审查的证据被提交给具有炭疽、重症监护和灾难医学专业知识的专业人员。2014年3月举行了一次会议,102名主题专家讨论了证据,并将现有最佳做法指南改编为临床使用框架,以便在大规模伤亡事件中明智、有效和合理地使用储存的mcm来治疗炭疽,本报告对此进行了描述。本报告涉及医院急性护理的要素,特别是抗毒素和静脉注射抗菌素的使用,以及大规模伤亡事件中常见炭疽特异性并发症的诊断和管理。本报告中的建议只有在满足从传统护理标准转向应急或危机护理标准的预定触发条件后才能实施,例如当病例的严重程度可能导致静脉注射抗菌剂、抗毒素、重症护理资源(例如胸管和胸引流系统)或诊断能力即将短缺时。本指南不涉及初级分诊决定、炭疽接触后预防、医院床位或劳动力激增能力,或mcm分发的后勤。临床医生、医院管理人员、州和地方卫生官员以及规划人员可以利用这些建议协助制定危机处理方案,以确保国家为炭疽大规模伤亡事件做好准备。
{"title":"Clinical Framework and Medical Countermeasure Use During an Anthrax Mass-Casualty Incident.","authors":"W. Bower, K. Hendricks, Satish K. Pillai, Julie T Guarnizo, D. Meaney-Delman","doi":"10.15585/mmwr.rr6404a1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.rr6404a1","url":null,"abstract":"In 2014, CDC published updated guidelines for the prevention and treatment of anthrax (Hendricks KA, Wright ME, Shadomy SV, et al. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention expert panel meetings on prevention and treatment of anthrax in adults. Emerg Infect Dis 2014;20[2]. Available at http://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/20/2/13-0687_article.htm). These guidelines provided recommended best practices for the diagnosis and treatment of persons with naturally occurring or bioterrorism-related anthrax in conventional medical settings. An aerosolized release of Bacillus anthracis spores over densely populated areas could become a mass-casualty incident. To prepare for this possibility, the U.S. government has stockpiled equipment and therapeutics (known as medical countermeasures [MCMs]) for anthrax prevention and treatment. However, previously developed, publicly available clinical recommendations have not addressed the use of MCMs or clinical management during an anthrax mass-casualty incident, when the number of patients is likely to exceed the ability of the health care infrastructure to provide conventional standards of care and supplies of MCMs might be inadequate to meet the demand required. To address this gap, in 2013, CDC conducted a series of systematic reviews of the scientific literature on anthrax to identify evidence that could help clinicians and public health authorities set guidelines for intravenous antimicrobial and antitoxin use, diagnosis of anthrax meningitis, and management of common anthrax-specific complications in the setting of a mass-casualty incident. Evidence from these reviews was presented to professionals with expertise in anthrax, critical care, and disaster medicine during a series of workgroup meetings that were held from August 2013 through March 2014. In March 2014, a meeting was held at which 102 subject matter experts discussed the evidence and adapted the existing best practices guidance to a clinical use framework for the judicious, efficient, and rational use of stockpiled MCMs for the treatment of anthrax during a mass-casualty incident, which is described in this report. This report addresses elements of hospital-based acute care, specifically antitoxins and intravenous antimicrobial use, and the diagnosis and management of common anthrax-specific complications during a mass-casualty incident. The recommendations in this report should be implemented only after predefined triggers have been met for shifting from conventional to contingency or crisis standards of care, such as when the magnitude of cases might lead to impending shortages of intravenous antimicrobials, antitoxins, critical care resources (e.g., chest tubes and chest drainage systems), or diagnostic capability. This guidance does not address primary triage decisions, anthrax postexposure prophylaxis, hospital bed or workforce surge capacity, or the logistics of dispensing MCMs. Clinicians, hospital administrators, state and local health official","PeriodicalId":51328,"journal":{"name":"Mmwr Recommendations and Reports","volume":"39 1","pages":"1-22"},"PeriodicalIF":33.7,"publicationDate":"2015-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"90054532","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 470
Sexually transmitted diseases treatment guidelines, 2015. 性传播疾病治疗指南,2015年。
IF 33.7 1区 医学 Q1 Medicine Pub Date : 2015-06-05 DOI: 10.18370/2309-4117.2015.24.51-56
K. Workowski, Gail A Bolan
These guidelines for the treatment of persons who have or are at risk for sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) were updated by CDC after consultation with a group of professionals knowledgeable in the field of STDs who met in Atlanta on April 30-May 2, 2013. The information in this report updates the Sexually Transmitted Diseases Treatment Guidelines, 2010 (MMWR Recomm Rep 2010;59 [No. RR-12]). These updated guidelines discuss 1) alternative treatment regimens for Neisseria gonorrhoeae; 2) the use of nucleic acid amplification tests for the diagnosis of trichomoniasis; 3) alternative treatment options for genital warts; 4) the role of Mycoplasma genitalium in urethritis/cervicitis and treatment-related implications; 5) updated HPV vaccine recommendations and counseling messages; 6) the management of persons who are transgender; 7) annual testing for hepatitis C in persons with HIV infection; 8) updated recommendations for diagnostic evaluation of urethritis; and 9) retesting to detect repeat infection. Physicians and other health-care providers can use these guidelines to assist in the prevention and treatment of STDs.
2013年4月30日至5月2日,美国疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)与一群在性病领域知识渊博的专业人士在亚特兰大会面后,更新了这些治疗性传播疾病(STDs)患者或高危人群的指南。本报告中的信息更新了《2010年性传播疾病治疗指南》(MMWR 2010年建议书;59号)。RR-12])。这些更新的指南讨论1)淋病奈瑟菌的替代治疗方案;2)利用核酸扩增试验诊断滴虫病;3)生殖器疣的替代治疗方案;4)生殖道支原体在尿道炎/宫颈炎中的作用及其治疗相关意义;5)更新HPV疫苗建议和咨询信息;6)跨性别者的管理;7)每年对艾滋病毒感染者进行丙型肝炎检测;尿道炎诊断评价的最新建议;9)复检以发现重复感染。医生和其他卫生保健提供者可以使用这些指南来帮助预防和治疗性传播疾病。
{"title":"Sexually transmitted diseases treatment guidelines, 2015.","authors":"K. Workowski, Gail A Bolan","doi":"10.18370/2309-4117.2015.24.51-56","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18370/2309-4117.2015.24.51-56","url":null,"abstract":"These guidelines for the treatment of persons who have or are at risk for sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) were updated by CDC after consultation with a group of professionals knowledgeable in the field of STDs who met in Atlanta on April 30-May 2, 2013. The information in this report updates the Sexually Transmitted Diseases Treatment Guidelines, 2010 (MMWR Recomm Rep 2010;59 [No. RR-12]). These updated guidelines discuss 1) alternative treatment regimens for Neisseria gonorrhoeae; 2) the use of nucleic acid amplification tests for the diagnosis of trichomoniasis; 3) alternative treatment options for genital warts; 4) the role of Mycoplasma genitalium in urethritis/cervicitis and treatment-related implications; 5) updated HPV vaccine recommendations and counseling messages; 6) the management of persons who are transgender; 7) annual testing for hepatitis C in persons with HIV infection; 8) updated recommendations for diagnostic evaluation of urethritis; and 9) retesting to detect repeat infection. Physicians and other health-care providers can use these guidelines to assist in the prevention and treatment of STDs.","PeriodicalId":51328,"journal":{"name":"Mmwr Recommendations and Reports","volume":"94 1","pages":"1-137"},"PeriodicalIF":33.7,"publicationDate":"2015-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"90305156","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3467
期刊
Mmwr Recommendations and Reports
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1