首页 > 最新文献

Conservation Science and Practice最新文献

英文 中文
Plant–pollinator interactions in apple orchards from a production and conservation perspective
IF 2.8 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION Pub Date : 2025-01-06 DOI: 10.1111/csp2.13280
Anne-Christine Mupepele, Vivien von Königslöw, Anna-Maria Bleile, Felix Fornoff, Jochen Fründ, Alexandra-Maria Klein

In an agricultural landscape, production and conservation ideally go hand in hand. In a win-win scenario, conservation measures, such as hedges and flower strips, provide support for biodiversity and crop production for example by increased pollination and pollinator diversity. However, these conservation measures may also decrease pollination by attracting pollinators and competing with crop flower visits. Here, we studied plant–pollinator interactions from two different perspectives. First, we looked at the production perspective investigating whether plant–pollinator networks differed between apple orchards with and without adjacent flower strips and hedges. With help of the Bayes factor, we investigated similarity and conclude that there are no differences between pollination networks with or without adjacent flower strips and hedges. Second, we looked at the conservation perspective and analyzed the impact of hedges and flower strips on pollinators and their interactions with plants before and after apple bloom in April. We showed that apple pollinators used more flower resources in flower strips and hedges across the whole season compared to isolated orchards. In orchards with flower strips and hedges, interactions were more constant over time. We conclude that flower strips and hedges are beneficial for conservation of apple pollinators without being harmful for apple flower pollination.

{"title":"Plant–pollinator interactions in apple orchards from a production and conservation perspective","authors":"Anne-Christine Mupepele,&nbsp;Vivien von Königslöw,&nbsp;Anna-Maria Bleile,&nbsp;Felix Fornoff,&nbsp;Jochen Fründ,&nbsp;Alexandra-Maria Klein","doi":"10.1111/csp2.13280","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.13280","url":null,"abstract":"<p>In an agricultural landscape, production and conservation ideally go hand in hand. In a win-win scenario, conservation measures, such as hedges and flower strips, provide support for biodiversity and crop production for example by increased pollination and pollinator diversity. However, these conservation measures may also decrease pollination by attracting pollinators and competing with crop flower visits. Here, we studied plant–pollinator interactions from two different perspectives. First, we looked at the production perspective investigating whether plant–pollinator networks differed between apple orchards with and without adjacent flower strips and hedges. With help of the Bayes factor, we investigated similarity and conclude that there are no differences between pollination networks with or without adjacent flower strips and hedges. Second, we looked at the conservation perspective and analyzed the impact of hedges and flower strips on pollinators and their interactions with plants before and after apple bloom in April. We showed that apple pollinators used more flower resources in flower strips and hedges across the whole season compared to isolated orchards. In orchards with flower strips and hedges, interactions were more constant over time. We conclude that flower strips and hedges are beneficial for conservation of apple pollinators without being harmful for apple flower pollination.</p>","PeriodicalId":51337,"journal":{"name":"Conservation Science and Practice","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/csp2.13280","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143112510","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The pet trade of native species outside of their natural distributions within Australia is a biosecurity risk
IF 2.8 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION Pub Date : 2025-01-06 DOI: 10.1111/csp2.13298
Adam Toomes, Oliver C. Stringham, Stephanie Moncayo, Katherine G. W. Hill, Jacob Maher, Freyja Watters, Sebastian Chekunov, Pablo García-Díaz, Lewis Mitchell, Joshua V. Ross, Phillip Cassey

The trade of alien species as pets is increasingly recognized as a biosecurity risk due to their intentional and accidental release into the wild. However, pets are often categorized as native or non-native at a national level, meaning that their presence outside of their native range, yet within their native country, may be an overlooked biosecurity threat. So-called “domestic non-natives” have established new populations across several countries and, in some cases, become invasive. Here, we investigated the extent of the domestic trade of native Australian pet species outside of their natural distributions and determined whether such locations were climatically suitable for potential alien establishments. Australia provides a unique system to explore this issue because it deters the trade of most alien species yet permits the keeping of a large diversity of native pets. We monitored trade from a popular Australian e-commerce site used to trade native pet birds, reptiles, and amphibians (29 k advertisements over 1 year; from July 2019 to July 2020). Of the 177 native vertebrate species we observed in the pet trade, 129 species (73%) had at least some instances of their trade occurring outside of their natural distribution. We found that climatically suitable environments were present outside the native range of 90 species and that these regions were proximal to suburbs where we observed trade. Our results indicate that the “domestic non-native” trade is widespread in Australia and that, if captive pets escape or are released into the wild in sufficient numbers, there is a risk of establishment for most of these species. We suggest that regulations pertaining to the trade of native pets ensure that careful biosecurity consideration is given in circumstances when trade occurs beyond a species' native range, both in the context of Australia and for other large countries with widespread pet industries.

{"title":"The pet trade of native species outside of their natural distributions within Australia is a biosecurity risk","authors":"Adam Toomes,&nbsp;Oliver C. Stringham,&nbsp;Stephanie Moncayo,&nbsp;Katherine G. W. Hill,&nbsp;Jacob Maher,&nbsp;Freyja Watters,&nbsp;Sebastian Chekunov,&nbsp;Pablo García-Díaz,&nbsp;Lewis Mitchell,&nbsp;Joshua V. Ross,&nbsp;Phillip Cassey","doi":"10.1111/csp2.13298","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.13298","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The trade of alien species as pets is increasingly recognized as a biosecurity risk due to their intentional and accidental release into the wild. However, pets are often categorized as native or non-native at a national level, meaning that their presence outside of their native range, yet within their native country, may be an overlooked biosecurity threat. So-called “domestic non-natives” have established new populations across several countries and, in some cases, become invasive. Here, we investigated the extent of the domestic trade of native Australian pet species outside of their natural distributions and determined whether such locations were climatically suitable for potential alien establishments. Australia provides a unique system to explore this issue because it deters the trade of most alien species yet permits the keeping of a large diversity of native pets. We monitored trade from a popular Australian e-commerce site used to trade native pet birds, reptiles, and amphibians (29 k advertisements over 1 year; from July 2019 to July 2020). Of the 177 native vertebrate species we observed in the pet trade, 129 species (73%) had at least some instances of their trade occurring outside of their natural distribution. We found that climatically suitable environments were present outside the native range of 90 species and that these regions were proximal to suburbs where we observed trade. Our results indicate that the “domestic non-native” trade is widespread in Australia and that, if captive pets escape or are released into the wild in sufficient numbers, there is a risk of establishment for most of these species. We suggest that regulations pertaining to the trade of native pets ensure that careful biosecurity consideration is given in circumstances when trade occurs beyond a species' native range, both in the context of Australia and for other large countries with widespread pet industries.</p>","PeriodicalId":51337,"journal":{"name":"Conservation Science and Practice","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/csp2.13298","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143112620","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Limited benefits of organic management and fungicide reduction to ground beetles in vineyards
IF 2.8 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION Pub Date : 2025-01-03 DOI: 10.1111/csp2.13303
Julia T. Gieser, Sebastian Kolb, Jo Marie Reiff, Kai Riess, Maura Hunke, Martin H. Entling, Jens Schirmel

The use of fungicides in agriculture can reduce animal biodiversity. Such non-target effects could be mitigated through fungus-resistant cultivars that reduce the need for fungicide applications. Hence, we conducted a study in 32 commercial vineyards in southwest Germany. We investigated the effect of fungicide spraying intensities (susceptible vs resistant cultivars) and management (conventional vs organic) on ground beetles as a widely used indicator group in agroecological studies. In addition, we examined the effects of local habitat conditions (e.g., microclimate, vegetation) and landscape characteristics. Fungicide applications were reduced by half in conventional, and almost by two-thirds in organic vineyards with fungus-resistant cultivars, compared to susceptible grape varieties in the same management regime. While there was no evidence that fungus-resistant cultivars positively affect the diversity of ground beetles, organic management doubled the number of individuals of conservation-relevant species per vineyard. Additionally, the proportion of semi-natural habitats in the surrounding landscape, and the vegetation height significantly affected the species composition across vineyards. We conclude that local habitat conditions and landscape characteristics influence ground beetles more than the fungicide spraying intensity. Additional measures such as organic management, moderate ground vegetation management, and landscape diversification are needed for the conservation of ground beetles in viticulture.

{"title":"Limited benefits of organic management and fungicide reduction to ground beetles in vineyards","authors":"Julia T. Gieser,&nbsp;Sebastian Kolb,&nbsp;Jo Marie Reiff,&nbsp;Kai Riess,&nbsp;Maura Hunke,&nbsp;Martin H. Entling,&nbsp;Jens Schirmel","doi":"10.1111/csp2.13303","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.13303","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The use of fungicides in agriculture can reduce animal biodiversity. Such non-target effects could be mitigated through fungus-resistant cultivars that reduce the need for fungicide applications. Hence, we conducted a study in 32 commercial vineyards in southwest Germany. We investigated the effect of fungicide spraying intensities (susceptible vs resistant cultivars) and management (conventional vs organic) on ground beetles as a widely used indicator group in agroecological studies. In addition, we examined the effects of local habitat conditions (e.g., microclimate, vegetation) and landscape characteristics. Fungicide applications were reduced by half in conventional, and almost by two-thirds in organic vineyards with fungus-resistant cultivars, compared to susceptible grape varieties in the same management regime. While there was no evidence that fungus-resistant cultivars positively affect the diversity of ground beetles, organic management doubled the number of individuals of conservation-relevant species per vineyard. Additionally, the proportion of semi-natural habitats in the surrounding landscape, and the vegetation height significantly affected the species composition across vineyards. We conclude that local habitat conditions and landscape characteristics influence ground beetles more than the fungicide spraying intensity. Additional measures such as organic management, moderate ground vegetation management, and landscape diversification are needed for the conservation of ground beetles in viticulture.</p>","PeriodicalId":51337,"journal":{"name":"Conservation Science and Practice","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/csp2.13303","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143111266","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Empirical test of the participation paradox in conservation and development
IF 2.8 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION Pub Date : 2025-01-02 DOI: 10.1111/csp2.13276
Nabin Baral, Joel T. Heinen, Marc J. Stern

Local participation has been greatly promoted to accomplish conservation and development goals globally, but the participation paradox, in which those empowered to participate fail to do so, has rarely been thoroughly scrutinized. Here we test the participation paradox with empirical data of 234 local decision-makers' participation in a decision-making forum, Conservation Area Management Committees, in the Annapurna Conservation Area, Nepal. Using an explanatory sequential mixed methods design, both quantitative and qualitative data were collected in 2013 and 2016, analyzed, interpreted, and integrated. Women, minorities, younger members, and non-elected members participated significantly less in decision-making than men, older members, and elected members and those with leadership roles and longer tenures on the committees. Qualitative analyses revealed five major themes for motivation to participate: influence in the community; personal incentives; conservation; improving access to natural resources; and feelings of accomplishment. Key constraints to participation included hardships and competing tasks; lack of incentives; perceptions of limited agency; disinterest; and emotional burdens. Participation motivations and constraints varied by gender, social group, and membership types. We discuss the theoretical and practical implications of these results for participatory approaches to conservation and sustainable development in general and the governance of protected areas in particular.

{"title":"Empirical test of the participation paradox in conservation and development","authors":"Nabin Baral,&nbsp;Joel T. Heinen,&nbsp;Marc J. Stern","doi":"10.1111/csp2.13276","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.13276","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Local participation has been greatly promoted to accomplish conservation and development goals globally, but the participation paradox, in which those empowered to participate fail to do so, has rarely been thoroughly scrutinized. Here we test the participation paradox with empirical data of 234 local decision-makers' participation in a decision-making forum, Conservation Area Management Committees, in the Annapurna Conservation Area, Nepal. Using an explanatory sequential mixed methods design, both quantitative and qualitative data were collected in 2013 and 2016, analyzed, interpreted, and integrated. Women, minorities, younger members, and non-elected members participated significantly less in decision-making than men, older members, and elected members and those with leadership roles and longer tenures on the committees. Qualitative analyses revealed five major themes for motivation to participate: influence in the community; personal incentives; conservation; improving access to natural resources; and feelings of accomplishment. Key constraints to participation included hardships and competing tasks; lack of incentives; perceptions of limited agency; disinterest; and emotional burdens. Participation motivations and constraints varied by gender, social group, and membership types. We discuss the theoretical and practical implications of these results for participatory approaches to conservation and sustainable development in general and the governance of protected areas in particular.</p>","PeriodicalId":51337,"journal":{"name":"Conservation Science and Practice","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2025-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/csp2.13276","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143110784","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Sustainability assessments should precede interventions promoting the hunting and consumptive use of pangolins
IF 2.8 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION Pub Date : 2024-12-30 DOI: 10.1111/csp2.13289
Charles A. Emogor, Kumar Paudel, Susan Lieberman
<p>Challender et al. (<span>2024</span>) argue that a recent amendment to a CITES (Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora) resolution could be detrimental to pangolins via reducing sustainable use options, particularly for Indigenous Peoples (IPs) and Local Communities (LCs) in Central and West Africa. The resolution in question, Res. Conf. 17.10 (Rev. CoP19), was initially adopted in 2016 when all eight pangolin species were included in Appendix I of CITES, prohibiting international commercial trade of wild-caught pangolins. The latest amendment, adopted in 2022 by the CITES Conference of the Parties, is consistent with the long-standing CITES precedent of calling for the closure of domestic markets in certain endangered CITES Appendix I species (or taxa)—examples include elephants, Asian big cats, helmeted hornbill, and marine turtles (CITES, <span>2016</span>, <span>2022a</span>, <span>2022b</span>, <span>2022c</span>). It urges “Parties in whose jurisdiction there is a legal domestic market for specimens of pangolins that is contributing to poaching or illegal trade, [to] take all necessary legislative, regulatory and enforcement measures to close their domestic markets for commercial trade in pangolin specimens and report such closures to the Secretariat” (CITES, <span>2022d</span>, p. 2).</p><p>IPs and LCs have been historically excluded from conservation decision-making and actions in numerous countries (Brittain et al., <span>2021</span>). In the context of Res. Conf. 17.10 (Rev. CoP19), Challender et al. propose that legal provisions for IPs and LCs to use pangolins sustainably could enhance pangolin conservation. The authors focus on Central and West Africa, suggesting domestic legislation excludes IPs and LCs in tropical Africa from using pangolins. However, this is not the case in Gabon (and possibly elsewhere in Africa), where traditional customary law permits pangolin hunting outside protected areas (Mambeya et al., <span>2018</span>).</p><p>We agree with Challender et al. that policies aiming to reduce threats to pangolins should consider the views and needs of IPs and LCs. Nonetheless, given that all pangolin species are globally threatened, we caution that any such use must be based on robust sustainability assessments and a clear understanding of what constitutes sustainable use—both of which are currently lacking for pangolins (we expand on this point below). Furthermore, such programs should also be grounded in site-specific assessments, as pangolin population dynamics and the socio-economic characteristics of communities around pangolin habitat conceivably vary across pangolin range. Additionally, given that the hunting and commercialization of pangolins are prohibited by law in virtually all Central and West African countries (USAID/West Africa Biodiversity and Climate Change, <span>2020</span>), and all international trade for primarily commercial purposes is prohibited by CITES, con
{"title":"Sustainability assessments should precede interventions promoting the hunting and consumptive use of pangolins","authors":"Charles A. Emogor,&nbsp;Kumar Paudel,&nbsp;Susan Lieberman","doi":"10.1111/csp2.13289","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.13289","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;Challender et al. (&lt;span&gt;2024&lt;/span&gt;) argue that a recent amendment to a CITES (Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora) resolution could be detrimental to pangolins via reducing sustainable use options, particularly for Indigenous Peoples (IPs) and Local Communities (LCs) in Central and West Africa. The resolution in question, Res. Conf. 17.10 (Rev. CoP19), was initially adopted in 2016 when all eight pangolin species were included in Appendix I of CITES, prohibiting international commercial trade of wild-caught pangolins. The latest amendment, adopted in 2022 by the CITES Conference of the Parties, is consistent with the long-standing CITES precedent of calling for the closure of domestic markets in certain endangered CITES Appendix I species (or taxa)—examples include elephants, Asian big cats, helmeted hornbill, and marine turtles (CITES, &lt;span&gt;2016&lt;/span&gt;, &lt;span&gt;2022a&lt;/span&gt;, &lt;span&gt;2022b&lt;/span&gt;, &lt;span&gt;2022c&lt;/span&gt;). It urges “Parties in whose jurisdiction there is a legal domestic market for specimens of pangolins that is contributing to poaching or illegal trade, [to] take all necessary legislative, regulatory and enforcement measures to close their domestic markets for commercial trade in pangolin specimens and report such closures to the Secretariat” (CITES, &lt;span&gt;2022d&lt;/span&gt;, p. 2).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;IPs and LCs have been historically excluded from conservation decision-making and actions in numerous countries (Brittain et al., &lt;span&gt;2021&lt;/span&gt;). In the context of Res. Conf. 17.10 (Rev. CoP19), Challender et al. propose that legal provisions for IPs and LCs to use pangolins sustainably could enhance pangolin conservation. The authors focus on Central and West Africa, suggesting domestic legislation excludes IPs and LCs in tropical Africa from using pangolins. However, this is not the case in Gabon (and possibly elsewhere in Africa), where traditional customary law permits pangolin hunting outside protected areas (Mambeya et al., &lt;span&gt;2018&lt;/span&gt;).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;We agree with Challender et al. that policies aiming to reduce threats to pangolins should consider the views and needs of IPs and LCs. Nonetheless, given that all pangolin species are globally threatened, we caution that any such use must be based on robust sustainability assessments and a clear understanding of what constitutes sustainable use—both of which are currently lacking for pangolins (we expand on this point below). Furthermore, such programs should also be grounded in site-specific assessments, as pangolin population dynamics and the socio-economic characteristics of communities around pangolin habitat conceivably vary across pangolin range. Additionally, given that the hunting and commercialization of pangolins are prohibited by law in virtually all Central and West African countries (USAID/West Africa Biodiversity and Climate Change, &lt;span&gt;2020&lt;/span&gt;), and all international trade for primarily commercial purposes is prohibited by CITES, con","PeriodicalId":51337,"journal":{"name":"Conservation Science and Practice","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2024-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/csp2.13289","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143120861","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Motivating conservation action in the Upper Midwest: Source attention, information seeking and sharing, and farmers' land management decisions
IF 2.8 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION Pub Date : 2024-12-26 DOI: 10.1111/csp2.13287
Dara M. Wald, Miguel Diaz-Manrique, Laura Witzling, Jaqueline Comito

Adoption of on-farm conservation strategies, such as edge-of-field practices, has the potential to reduce nutrient runoff, promote greater biodiversity, and improve water quality. To date, adoption rates among farmers are extremely low. Communication with farmers has been identified as a vital strategy to encourage the voluntary adoption of these practices and policies that promote on-farm conservation. Yet little is known about which information sources shape farmers' concerns about conservation practices, perceptions of the risks and benefits of conservation practices, and ultimately, adoption behaviors. Using the Social Amplification of Risk Framework, the Risk Information Seeking and Processing Model, and a cross-sectional survey, we examined farmers' concerns about nitrate loss and water quality, perceptions of the risks and benefits of conservation practices, attention to messages and information sources, and communication behaviors. We received N = 474 completed surveys. Attention to agricultural associations was associated with decreased concern about nitrates and diminished perceptions of the benefits of edge-of-field practices. Farmers paying greater attention to non-agricultural and social media sources were more likely to share and seek information. Attention to interpersonal sources was associated with greater adoption behaviors. This work highlights the importance of farmers' social networks, exposure to multiple information sources, and the need to identify new strategies for engagement and direct communication with hard-to-reach audiences. We conclude with a discussion of the implications of this work for conservation communication and land management practices to promote environmental health.

{"title":"Motivating conservation action in the Upper Midwest: Source attention, information seeking and sharing, and farmers' land management decisions","authors":"Dara M. Wald,&nbsp;Miguel Diaz-Manrique,&nbsp;Laura Witzling,&nbsp;Jaqueline Comito","doi":"10.1111/csp2.13287","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.13287","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Adoption of on-farm conservation strategies, such as edge-of-field practices, has the potential to reduce nutrient runoff, promote greater biodiversity, and improve water quality. To date, adoption rates among farmers are extremely low. Communication with farmers has been identified as a vital strategy to encourage the voluntary adoption of these practices and policies that promote on-farm conservation. Yet little is known about which information sources shape farmers' concerns about conservation practices, perceptions of the risks and benefits of conservation practices, and ultimately, adoption behaviors. Using the Social Amplification of Risk Framework, the Risk Information Seeking and Processing Model, and a cross-sectional survey, we examined farmers' concerns about nitrate loss and water quality, perceptions of the risks and benefits of conservation practices, attention to messages and information sources, and communication behaviors. We received <i>N</i> = 474 completed surveys. Attention to agricultural associations was associated with decreased concern about nitrates and diminished perceptions of the benefits of edge-of-field practices. Farmers paying greater attention to non-agricultural and social media sources were more likely to share and seek information. Attention to interpersonal sources was associated with greater adoption behaviors. This work highlights the importance of farmers' social networks, exposure to multiple information sources, and the need to identify new strategies for engagement and direct communication with hard-to-reach audiences. We conclude with a discussion of the implications of this work for conservation communication and land management practices to promote environmental health.</p>","PeriodicalId":51337,"journal":{"name":"Conservation Science and Practice","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2024-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/csp2.13287","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143119653","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
To mix, or not to mix?: Mitogenomic insights for risk assessment of an interpopulation translocations of the critically endangered European mink
IF 2.8 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION Pub Date : 2024-12-25 DOI: 10.1111/csp2.13291
Jakub Skorupski, Christian Seebass, Wolfgang Festl, Natalia Kiseleva, Przemysław Śmietana, Mihai Marinov

This study provides a comprehensive, population-scale analysis of the mitogenome of the critically endangered European mink, Mustela lutreola, involving 52 individuals from Russia, Germany (conservation breeding stock), Romania, and France-Spain. Significant mitogenomic diversity was identified within the previously presumed genetically homogenous French-Spanish population, challenging concerns of inbreeding. Despite having lower nucleotide diversity (π = 0.00024) than the German (π = 0.00055) and Russian (π = 0.00048) populations, the French-Spanish group exhibited impressive haplotype diversity (h = 0.9810) compared to Russian (h = 0.8727) and German (h = 0.7826) populations. Considering genetic diversity and uniqueness, the French-Spanish population ranked highest in conservation importance, second only to the combined assessment of all other populations. The extensive population structuring identified two distinct haplogroups—the Central-Eastern European and the Aquitaine-Navarre—suggesting reconsideration of their conservation status. These findings guide tailored conservation strategies, emphasizing the need for careful interpopulation translocations to protect genetic diversity and prevent outbreeding depression. A decision algorithm for these translocations has been proposed.

{"title":"To mix, or not to mix?: Mitogenomic insights for risk assessment of an interpopulation translocations of the critically endangered European mink","authors":"Jakub Skorupski,&nbsp;Christian Seebass,&nbsp;Wolfgang Festl,&nbsp;Natalia Kiseleva,&nbsp;Przemysław Śmietana,&nbsp;Mihai Marinov","doi":"10.1111/csp2.13291","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.13291","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study provides a comprehensive, population-scale analysis of the mitogenome of the critically endangered European mink, <i>Mustela lutreola</i>, involving 52 individuals from Russia, Germany (conservation breeding stock), Romania, and France-Spain. Significant mitogenomic diversity was identified within the previously presumed genetically homogenous French-Spanish population, challenging concerns of inbreeding. Despite having lower nucleotide diversity (<i>π</i> = 0.00024) than the German (<i>π</i> = 0.00055) and Russian (<i>π</i> = 0.00048) populations, the French-Spanish group exhibited impressive haplotype diversity (<i>h</i> = 0.9810) compared to Russian (<i>h</i> = 0.8727) and German (<i>h</i> = 0.7826) populations. Considering genetic diversity and uniqueness, the French-Spanish population ranked highest in conservation importance, second only to the combined assessment of all other populations. The extensive population structuring identified two distinct haplogroups—the Central-Eastern European and the Aquitaine-Navarre—suggesting reconsideration of their conservation status. These findings guide tailored conservation strategies, emphasizing the need for careful interpopulation translocations to protect genetic diversity and prevent outbreeding depression. A decision algorithm for these translocations has been proposed.</p>","PeriodicalId":51337,"journal":{"name":"Conservation Science and Practice","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2024-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/csp2.13291","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143119056","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Changes in African lion demography and population growth with increased protection in a large, prey-depleted ecosystem
IF 2.8 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION Pub Date : 2024-12-24 DOI: 10.1111/csp2.13256
Scott Creel, Matthew S. Becker, Ben Goodheart, Anna Kusler, Kachama Banda, Kambwiri Banda, Milan Vinks, Catherine Sun, Chase Dart, Stephi Matsushima, Ruth Kabwe, Will Donald, Luka Zyambo, Peter Indala, Adrian Kaluka, Clive Chifunte, Craig Reid

Large carnivores such as the lion are declining across Africa, in part because their large herbivore prey is declining. There is consensus that increased protection from prey depletion will be necessary to reverse the decline of lion populations, but few studies have tested whether increased protection is sufficient to reverse the decline, particularly in the large, open ecosystems where most lions remain. Here, we used an integrated population model to test whether lion demography and population dynamics were measurably improved by increased protection. We used data from monitoring of 358 individuals from 2013 to 2021 in the Greater Kafue Ecosystem, where prior research showed that lions were strongly limited by prey depletion, but protection increased in several well-defined areas beginning in 2018. In some other areas, protection decreased. In areas with high protection, lion fecundity was 29% higher, and mean annual apparent survival (φ) was 8.3% higher (with a minimum difference of 6.0% for prime-aged adult females and a maximum difference of 11.9% for sub-adult males). These demographic benefits combined to produce likely population growth in areas with high protection (λ̂ = 1.085, 90% CI = 0.97, 1.21), despite likely population decline in areas with low protection (λ̂ = 0.970, 90% CI = 0.88, 1.07). For the ecosystem as a whole, population size remained relatively constant at a moderate density of 3.74 (±0.49 SD) to 4.13 (±0.52 SD) lions/100 km2. With the growth observed in areas with high protection, the expected doubling time was 10 years. Despite this, recovery at the scale of the entire ecosystem is likely to be slow without increased protection; the current growth rate would require 50 years to double. Our results demonstrate that increased protection is likely to improve the reproduction and population growth rate of lions at a large scale within an unfenced ecosystem that has been greatly affected by poaching.

{"title":"Changes in African lion demography and population growth with increased protection in a large, prey-depleted ecosystem","authors":"Scott Creel,&nbsp;Matthew S. Becker,&nbsp;Ben Goodheart,&nbsp;Anna Kusler,&nbsp;Kachama Banda,&nbsp;Kambwiri Banda,&nbsp;Milan Vinks,&nbsp;Catherine Sun,&nbsp;Chase Dart,&nbsp;Stephi Matsushima,&nbsp;Ruth Kabwe,&nbsp;Will Donald,&nbsp;Luka Zyambo,&nbsp;Peter Indala,&nbsp;Adrian Kaluka,&nbsp;Clive Chifunte,&nbsp;Craig Reid","doi":"10.1111/csp2.13256","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.13256","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Large carnivores such as the lion are declining across Africa, in part because their large herbivore prey is declining. There is consensus that increased protection from prey depletion will be necessary to reverse the decline of lion populations, but few studies have tested whether increased protection is sufficient to reverse the decline, particularly in the large, open ecosystems where most lions remain. Here, we used an integrated population model to test whether lion demography and population dynamics were measurably improved by increased protection. We used data from monitoring of 358 individuals from 2013 to 2021 in the Greater Kafue Ecosystem, where prior research showed that lions were strongly limited by prey depletion, but protection increased in several well-defined areas beginning in 2018. In some other areas, protection decreased. In areas with high protection, lion fecundity was 29% higher, and mean annual apparent survival (<i>φ</i>) was 8.3% higher (with a minimum difference of 6.0% for prime-aged adult females and a maximum difference of 11.9% for sub-adult males). These demographic benefits combined to produce likely population growth in areas with high protection (<span></span><math>\u0000 <mrow>\u0000 <mover>\u0000 <mi>λ</mi>\u0000 <mo>̂</mo>\u0000 </mover>\u0000 </mrow></math> = 1.085, 90% CI = 0.97, 1.21), despite likely population decline in areas with low protection (<span></span><math>\u0000 <mrow>\u0000 <mover>\u0000 <mi>λ</mi>\u0000 <mo>̂</mo>\u0000 </mover>\u0000 </mrow></math> = 0.970, 90% CI = 0.88, 1.07). For the ecosystem as a whole, population size remained relatively constant at a moderate density of 3.74 (±0.49 SD) to 4.13 (±0.52 SD) lions/100 km<sup>2</sup>. With the growth observed in areas with high protection, the expected doubling time was 10 years. Despite this, recovery at the scale of the entire ecosystem is likely to be slow without increased protection; the current growth rate would require 50 years to double. Our results demonstrate that increased protection is likely to improve the reproduction and population growth rate of lions at a large scale within an unfenced ecosystem that has been greatly affected by poaching.</p>","PeriodicalId":51337,"journal":{"name":"Conservation Science and Practice","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2024-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/csp2.13256","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143118638","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Digital equity in a crowded tool space: Navigating opportunities and challenges for equitable implementation of conservation technologies
IF 2.8 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION Pub Date : 2024-12-24 DOI: 10.1111/csp2.13279
Karyn M. Tabor, Natasha Stavros, Dawn Biehler, Liliana C. Castillo-Villamor, Dillon Mahmoudi, Luis Mario Moreno Amado, Margaret B. Holland

We call on conservation funders, technology developers, and practitioners to explore how digital technologies can transform conservation practice. Actors supporting, developing, and funding digital technologies for conservation must address digital inequity and reduce the societal risks of digital technologies that may undermine conservation goals. We highlight the challenges in leveraging digital conservation technologies and recommend approaches to increase access to digital technologies for uptake by diverse users while supporting equitable participation from diverse user communities to shape digital technologies and their applications. Improving access to and use of tools may be achieved through strategic funding for digital design that recognizes and supports local solutions and diverse practices and perspectives. With increasing digital access, funders must also emphasize adherence to safeguards and protocols to reduce risks associated with digital technologies. By adopting more ethical methodologies related to digital technologies, we not only enhance global sustainability but also foster collaborative relationships with communities, recognizing the intrinsic value of their expertise in conservation initiatives and jointly safeguarding the environment to ensure the well-being of all. Encouraging more equitable approaches to conservation technologies underpins global priorities for sustainable development by centering and supporting the communities most directly involved in conservation action.

{"title":"Digital equity in a crowded tool space: Navigating opportunities and challenges for equitable implementation of conservation technologies","authors":"Karyn M. Tabor,&nbsp;Natasha Stavros,&nbsp;Dawn Biehler,&nbsp;Liliana C. Castillo-Villamor,&nbsp;Dillon Mahmoudi,&nbsp;Luis Mario Moreno Amado,&nbsp;Margaret B. Holland","doi":"10.1111/csp2.13279","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.13279","url":null,"abstract":"<p>We call on conservation funders, technology developers, and practitioners to explore how digital technologies can transform conservation practice. Actors supporting, developing, and funding digital technologies for conservation must address digital inequity and reduce the societal risks of digital technologies that may undermine conservation goals. We highlight the challenges in leveraging digital conservation technologies and recommend approaches to increase access to digital technologies for uptake by diverse users while supporting equitable participation from diverse user communities to shape digital technologies and their applications. Improving access to and use of tools may be achieved through strategic funding for digital design that recognizes and supports local solutions and diverse practices and perspectives. With increasing digital access, funders must also emphasize adherence to safeguards and protocols to reduce risks associated with digital technologies. By adopting more ethical methodologies related to digital technologies, we not only enhance global sustainability but also foster collaborative relationships with communities, recognizing the intrinsic value of their expertise in conservation initiatives and jointly safeguarding the environment to ensure the well-being of all. Encouraging more equitable approaches to conservation technologies underpins global priorities for sustainable development by centering and supporting the communities most directly involved in conservation action.</p>","PeriodicalId":51337,"journal":{"name":"Conservation Science and Practice","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2024-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/csp2.13279","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143118888","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Willingness to protect bird species depends on individual respondents' demographic and species traits
IF 2.8 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION Pub Date : 2024-12-20 DOI: 10.1111/csp2.13277
Christoph Randler, Sophia Koch

Willingness to donate and to protect (WTP) is an important part of worldwide nature conservation, and animals can be used as flagships for establishing conservation measures and collecting donations. We here focus on 141 German bird species to address factors that impact WTP by using a survey on the individual respondent level. Further, another analysis assessed traits on the species level. A total of 1003 respondents participated in the survey. Results of an analysis of covariance suggest that, at the level of the individual, subjective cuteness rating, coloration, species knowledge, and age positively influenced WTP. On the species trait level based on the 141 species, cuteness, coloration, and internet salience were positively related to WTP, and presence at feeders, eBird entries, and global abundance were negatively related to WTP. This is one of the first studies based on a large number of bird species from Europe and it can inform regional nongovernmental organizations for selecting charismatic species for conservation communications. Moreover, this study consequently addresses cuteness in birds as an important factor.

捐赠和保护意愿(WTP)是全球自然保护的重要组成部分,动物可以作为制定保护措施和收集捐赠的旗帜。在此,我们以德国的 141 种鸟类为研究对象,通过受访者个人层面的调查,探讨影响 WTP 的因素。此外,我们还进行了另一项分析,评估了物种层面的特征。共有 1003 名受访者参与了调查。协方差分析的结果表明,在个体层面上,主观可爱程度、颜色、物种知识和年龄对 WTP 有积极影响。在基于 141 个物种的物种特征水平上,可爱程度、肤色和互联网显著性与 WTP 呈正相关,而出现在喂食器、eBird 记录和全球丰度与 WTP 呈负相关。这是首次基于欧洲大量鸟类物种的研究,可以为地区性非政府组织选择魅力物种进行保护宣传提供参考。此外,本研究还将鸟类的可爱程度作为一个重要因素进行了探讨。
{"title":"Willingness to protect bird species depends on individual respondents' demographic and species traits","authors":"Christoph Randler,&nbsp;Sophia Koch","doi":"10.1111/csp2.13277","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.13277","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Willingness to donate and to protect (WTP) is an important part of worldwide nature conservation, and animals can be used as flagships for establishing conservation measures and collecting donations. We here focus on 141 German bird species to address factors that impact WTP by using a survey on the individual respondent level. Further, another analysis assessed traits on the species level. A total of 1003 respondents participated in the survey. Results of an analysis of covariance suggest that, at the level of the individual, subjective cuteness rating, coloration, species knowledge, and age positively influenced WTP. On the species trait level based on the 141 species, cuteness, coloration, and internet salience were positively related to WTP, and presence at feeders, eBird entries, and global abundance were negatively related to WTP. This is one of the first studies based on a large number of bird species from Europe and it can inform regional nongovernmental organizations for selecting charismatic species for conservation communications. Moreover, this study consequently addresses cuteness in birds as an important factor.</p>","PeriodicalId":51337,"journal":{"name":"Conservation Science and Practice","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/csp2.13277","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143117300","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Conservation Science and Practice
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1