Anja Skroblin, Kaye Currey, Jen A. Grindrod, Rachel Morgain, Ram Pandit, Stephen T. Garnett
Multi-stakeholder partnerships that leverage the skills and resources of partner organizations are becoming an increasingly popular strategy to undertake recovery actions for threatened species and threatened ecological communities. When partnerships are focused on recovery, there is a need to understand how successful outcomes are derived and the aspects of the partnerships that lead to benefits. In this study, we investigate the key conditions needed to build successful partnerships for the recovery of threatened species and threatened ecological communities. We carried out 44 semi-structured interviews with partners from 24 partnerships focused on 23 Australian threatened species or ecological communities. We investigated the aims and achievements of these partnerships and used thematic analysis to identify common themes relating to the achievement of success. From these interviews, we identified two dimensions of perceived success: (1) the functionality of a partnership, and (2) achieving the recovery objectives, and six major themes related to achieving success: (1) build a skilled consortium, (2) finding alignment, (3) managing the partner interface, (4) secure funding, (5) generating value, and (6) advocacy and raising awareness. We describe the main threads of content under each of these major themes. The findings of this study provide guidance to governments, conservation organizations, and land managers when making decisions about establishing and servicing partnerships to support the recovery of threatened species and threatened ecological communities.
{"title":"Key conditions for success of partnerships for conservation of threatened species and threatened ecological communities","authors":"Anja Skroblin, Kaye Currey, Jen A. Grindrod, Rachel Morgain, Ram Pandit, Stephen T. Garnett","doi":"10.1111/csp2.70121","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.70121","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Multi-stakeholder partnerships that leverage the skills and resources of partner organizations are becoming an increasingly popular strategy to undertake recovery actions for threatened species and threatened ecological communities. When partnerships are focused on recovery, there is a need to understand how successful outcomes are derived and the aspects of the partnerships that lead to benefits. In this study, we investigate the key conditions needed to build successful partnerships for the recovery of threatened species and threatened ecological communities. We carried out 44 semi-structured interviews with partners from 24 partnerships focused on 23 Australian threatened species or ecological communities. We investigated the aims and achievements of these partnerships and used thematic analysis to identify common themes relating to the achievement of success. From these interviews, we identified two dimensions of perceived success: (1) the functionality of a partnership, and (2) achieving the recovery objectives, and six major themes related to achieving success: (1) build a skilled consortium, (2) finding alignment, (3) managing the partner interface, (4) secure funding, (5) generating value, and (6) advocacy and raising awareness. We describe the main threads of content under each of these major themes. The findings of this study provide guidance to governments, conservation organizations, and land managers when making decisions about establishing and servicing partnerships to support the recovery of threatened species and threatened ecological communities.</p>","PeriodicalId":51337,"journal":{"name":"Conservation Science and Practice","volume":"7 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://conbio.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/csp2.70121","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145779529","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Isabella C. Ossiander, Giacomo Bernardi, Marta D. Palacios, Donald A. Croll, Kelly M. Zilliacus, Abel Trejo-Ramirez, May B. Roberts, Adrian Munguia-Vega, Xchel A. Perez-Palafox, Pablo Ahuja, Rogelio Gonzalez-Armas, Melissa R. Cronin
Sharks, skates, and rays (elasmobranchs) are experiencing global population declines, leading to heightened concern regarding the impacts of target and bycatch fishing on their populations. Globally, market mislabeling of unsustainably harvested fish can lead to confusion about species identity and origin, mask unsustainable fishing practices, and inhibit recovery of depleted populations. Therefore, it is important to increase transparency about the identity of species sold to address the potential impact of mislabeled or illegally harvested threatened elasmobranchs. We used DNA barcode sequencing to identify the species composition of rays sold in fish markets and supermarkets in La Paz, Baja California Sur, Mexico, an important market for small-scale fisheries in Northwestern Mexico. We identified 131 samples from 36 market locations collected between 2020 and 2022 representing 14 species belonging to eight families. None of the samples were labeled using local names for individual species by the seller; instead, they were sold under four categories: mantarraya, pescado seco, machaca, and cubana seca. The most common species identified by genetic analyses were diamond stingray (Hypanus dipterurus) (n = 47), longtail stingray (H. longus) (n = 37), and California butterfly ray (Gymnura marmorata) (n = 11). Greater than 78% of the samples identified are considered threatened by the IUCN Red List. This included two species of devil ray (Mobula munkiana and Mobula thurstoni), both of which are federally protected in Mexico. The use of overly broad seafood commercial names for threatened ray species is concerning, given that most species exhibit vulnerable life history characteristics and have documented population declines. We recommend expanding point of purchase identification for fresh products weighed and packaged in markets with Mexican authorities to better understand the extent of elasmobranch fishing and to identify which fisheries and species require increased action for their conservation in the Mexican Pacific.
{"title":"Composition and conservation status of rays sold in Baja California Sur, Mexico","authors":"Isabella C. Ossiander, Giacomo Bernardi, Marta D. Palacios, Donald A. Croll, Kelly M. Zilliacus, Abel Trejo-Ramirez, May B. Roberts, Adrian Munguia-Vega, Xchel A. Perez-Palafox, Pablo Ahuja, Rogelio Gonzalez-Armas, Melissa R. Cronin","doi":"10.1111/csp2.70164","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.70164","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Sharks, skates, and rays (elasmobranchs) are experiencing global population declines, leading to heightened concern regarding the impacts of target and bycatch fishing on their populations. Globally, market mislabeling of unsustainably harvested fish can lead to confusion about species identity and origin, mask unsustainable fishing practices, and inhibit recovery of depleted populations. Therefore, it is important to increase transparency about the identity of species sold to address the potential impact of mislabeled or illegally harvested threatened elasmobranchs. We used DNA barcode sequencing to identify the species composition of rays sold in fish markets and supermarkets in La Paz, Baja California Sur, Mexico, an important market for small-scale fisheries in Northwestern Mexico. We identified 131 samples from 36 market locations collected between 2020 and 2022 representing 14 species belonging to eight families. None of the samples were labeled using local names for individual species by the seller; instead, they were sold under four categories: <i>mantarraya</i>, <i>pescado seco</i>, <i>machaca</i>, and <i>cubana seca</i>. The most common species identified by genetic analyses were diamond stingray (<i>Hypanus dipterurus</i>) (<i>n</i> = 47), longtail stingray (<i>H. longus</i>) (<i>n</i> = 37), and California butterfly ray (<i>Gymnura marmorata</i>) (<i>n</i> = 11). Greater than 78% of the samples identified are considered threatened by the IUCN Red List. This included two species of devil ray (<i>Mobula munkiana</i> and <i>Mobula thurstoni</i>), both of which are federally protected in Mexico. The use of overly broad seafood commercial names for threatened ray species is concerning, given that most species exhibit vulnerable life history characteristics and have documented population declines. We recommend expanding point of purchase identification for fresh products weighed and packaged in markets with Mexican authorities to better understand the extent of elasmobranch fishing and to identify which fisheries and species require increased action for their conservation in the Mexican Pacific.</p>","PeriodicalId":51337,"journal":{"name":"Conservation Science and Practice","volume":"7 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2025-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://conbio.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/csp2.70164","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145779469","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Broadly used in South African conservation studies, the South African Protected Areas Database is known to contain limitations that require restructuring before use. By replicating the methodology of a recent study in northern Limpopo Province, South Africa, we show how failing to account for such limitations leads to unintentional errors which substantially misrepresent the size of the protected area estate, resulting in a questionable assessment of its contribution to biodiversity conservation targets. Given the implications of employing inaccurate protected area data alongside proposed industrial development and mining that would compromise the ecological integrity of the study area, we stress the importance of validating the national dataset against updated information, provincial-level data, and local knowledge.