Pub Date : 2026-01-07DOI: 10.1016/j.ridd.2026.105207
Young Dawn Patricia Chuan Yu, Najmunnisa Shaik Alawoodeen, Tan Seok Hui
The Specific Language System First (SLSF) approach has been proposed as a resource-efficient strategy for strengthening Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC) service delivery in school settings (Maholtz & Olson, 2025; Peterson, 2023). This project examined the implementation of an adapted SLSF approach across three special education schools in Singapore, which involved the implementation of a standardised AAC system, dynamic assessment of AAC needs using trial kits, and provision of specialist support for AAC implementation to teachers. Class teachers of 71 Year 1 students, reported gains in students’ communication skills and improved confidence in AAC implementation, by the end of the school year. Findings that Year 1 students with standardised AAC systems, showed similar gains in communication skills and similar levels of engagement with AAC, as 17 Year 2 peers with customised AAC systems and similar cognitive profiles, indicate that standardised AAC systems do not hinder the development of communication skills for students with complex communication needs. Compared to previous years where provision of personal AAC systems took a longer time, Year 1 students in the SLSF approach received their own personalised AAC system after 10 weeks of school, suggesting that the SLSF approach is useful for supporting communication and AAC implementation.
{"title":"Adapting the Specific Language System First approach for special education schools in Singapore: A pilot evaluation","authors":"Young Dawn Patricia Chuan Yu, Najmunnisa Shaik Alawoodeen, Tan Seok Hui","doi":"10.1016/j.ridd.2026.105207","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ridd.2026.105207","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The Specific Language System First (SLSF) approach has been proposed as a resource-efficient strategy for strengthening Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC) service delivery in school settings (Maholtz & Olson, 2025; Peterson, 2023). This project examined the implementation of an adapted SLSF approach across three special education schools in Singapore, which involved the implementation of a standardised AAC system, dynamic assessment of AAC needs using trial kits, and provision of specialist support for AAC implementation to teachers. Class teachers of 71 Year 1 students, reported gains in students’ communication skills and improved confidence in AAC implementation, by the end of the school year. Findings that Year 1 students with standardised AAC systems, showed similar gains in communication skills and similar levels of engagement with AAC, as 17 Year 2 peers with customised AAC systems and similar cognitive profiles, indicate that standardised AAC systems do not hinder the development of communication skills for students with complex communication needs. Compared to previous years where provision of personal AAC systems took a longer time, Year 1 students in the SLSF approach received their own personalised AAC system after 10 weeks of school, suggesting that the SLSF approach is useful for supporting communication and AAC implementation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51351,"journal":{"name":"Research in Developmental Disabilities","volume":"169 ","pages":"Article 105207"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2026-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145928675","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-06DOI: 10.1016/j.ridd.2025.105198
Deniz Ayşegül Söğüt
Background
The substantial variability in educational opportunities across individual and environmental conditions in Türkiye provides a meaningful context for examining associations between self-determination and contextual factors. However, the absence of culturally adapted student-report measures continues to constrain empirical analyses of these relationships.
Aim: This study (1) adapted and validated the Turkish version of the AIR Self-Determination Scale–Student Form and (2) identified contextual predictors of self-determination using both classical statistical analyses and machine learning modeling. Guided by Causal Agency Theory, the study explored the interaction between students’ self-determination capacities and perceived opportunities across diverse educational settings in Türkiye.
Results: Psychometric analyses (n = 342) confirmed the four-factor capacity–opportunity structure and showed strong internal consistency. In a second sample (n = 501), self-determination scores varied by disability status, age, school type, residential area, and rehabilitation support. Capacity and opportunity were moderately correlated. ML models explained substantial variance in total scores and identified school type and disability status as the strongest predictors.
Conclusion: Findings suggest that self-determination is linked to both individual characteristics and contextual opportunity structures. Enhancing autonomy-supportive practices and using data-informed approaches to identify students with limited opportunities may support stronger self-determination outcomes in Türkiye.
{"title":"Demographic and environmental predictors of self-determination in Turkish students with and without disabilities: A classical and machine learning-based analysis","authors":"Deniz Ayşegül Söğüt","doi":"10.1016/j.ridd.2025.105198","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ridd.2025.105198","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The substantial variability in educational opportunities across individual and environmental conditions in Türkiye provides a meaningful context for examining associations between self-determination and contextual factors. However, the absence of culturally adapted student-report measures continues to constrain empirical analyses of these relationships.</div><div>Aim: This study (1) adapted and validated the Turkish version of the AIR Self-Determination Scale–Student Form and (2) identified contextual predictors of self-determination using both classical statistical analyses and machine learning modeling. Guided by Causal Agency Theory, the study explored the interaction between students’ self-determination capacities and perceived opportunities across diverse educational settings in Türkiye.</div><div>Results: Psychometric analyses (n = 342) confirmed the four-factor capacity–opportunity structure and showed strong internal consistency. In a second sample (n = 501), self-determination scores varied by disability status, age, school type, residential area, and rehabilitation support. Capacity and opportunity were moderately correlated. ML models explained substantial variance in total scores and identified school type and disability status as the strongest predictors.</div><div>Conclusion: Findings suggest that self-determination is linked to both individual characteristics and contextual opportunity structures. Enhancing autonomy-supportive practices and using data-informed approaches to identify students with limited opportunities may support stronger self-determination outcomes in Türkiye.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51351,"journal":{"name":"Research in Developmental Disabilities","volume":"169 ","pages":"Article 105198"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2026-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145919200","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-05DOI: 10.1016/j.ridd.2025.105187
George Kritsotakis, Eleni Morfidi
The aim of the current study was to examine figurative competence among upper-elementary Greek-speaking children with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) and dyslexia compared to typically developing (TD) peers, with a specific focus on how structural language skills (i.e., receptive vocabulary and morphosyntax), nonlinguistic factors (i.e., chronological age and nonverbal reasoning ability), and reading comprehension (RC) contribute to figurative language understanding. A total of 105 children (35 per group; M = 10.5 years, SD = 1), matched for age, gender, and nonverbal reasoning ability had participated. Results indicated that both clinical samples performed significantly lower than TD controls on the figurative language comprehension task, regardless of figurative type, with no statistically significant differences observed between the ASD and Dyslexia groups. Proverbs were consistently more challenging than idioms across all participants, a disparity especially marked in those with neurodevelopmental conditions. In addition, both groups demonstrated reduced performance in reading comprehension relative to their TD peers. While structural language deficits were evident among participants with ASD and dyslexia, the ASD group displayed a more heterogeneous profile, showing comparatively milder impairments. Regression analyses showed distinct predictive patterns: in the TD group, figurative competence was positively associated with age and RC, whereas in both target groups, morphosyntactic ability emerged as the primary predictor. These findings underscore the persistent difficulties figurative language poses for children with ASD and dyslexia and highlight the role of structural language skills, particularly morphosyntactic ability, in supporting nonliteral understanding. Implications for educational assessment and intervention practices are also discussed.
{"title":"Unraveling nonliteral meaning: Figurative competence in autism spectrum disorder and dyslexia","authors":"George Kritsotakis, Eleni Morfidi","doi":"10.1016/j.ridd.2025.105187","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ridd.2025.105187","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The aim of the current study was to examine figurative competence among upper-elementary Greek-speaking children with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) and dyslexia compared to typically developing (TD) peers, with a specific focus on how structural language skills (i.e., receptive vocabulary and morphosyntax), nonlinguistic factors (i.e., chronological age and nonverbal reasoning ability), and reading comprehension (RC) contribute to figurative language understanding. A total of 105 children (35 per group; M = 10.5 years, SD = 1), matched for age, gender, and nonverbal reasoning ability had participated. Results indicated that both clinical samples performed significantly lower than TD controls on the figurative language comprehension task, regardless of figurative type, with no statistically significant differences observed between the ASD and Dyslexia groups. Proverbs were consistently more challenging than idioms across all participants, a disparity especially marked in those with neurodevelopmental conditions. In addition, both groups demonstrated reduced performance in reading comprehension relative to their TD peers. While structural language deficits were evident among participants with ASD and dyslexia, the ASD group displayed a more heterogeneous profile, showing comparatively milder impairments. Regression analyses showed distinct predictive patterns: in the TD group, figurative competence was positively associated with age and RC, whereas in both target groups, morphosyntactic ability emerged as the primary predictor. These findings underscore the persistent difficulties figurative language poses for children with ASD and dyslexia and highlight the role of structural language skills, particularly morphosyntactic ability, in supporting nonliteral understanding. Implications for educational assessment and intervention practices are also discussed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51351,"journal":{"name":"Research in Developmental Disabilities","volume":"169 ","pages":"Article 105187"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2026-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145897924","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-05DOI: 10.1016/j.ridd.2026.105206
Tanya Rihtman , Miri Tal-Saban
Aim
The Little Developmental Coordination Disorder Questionnaire (LDCDQ) is a screening tool for identifying preschool children who may have Developmental Coordination Disorder (DCD), originally developed in the Hebrew language. This study updated the original LDCDQ’s psychometric properties with an expanded sample size, and ascertained sensitivity, specificity and cutoff scores.
Method
An observational cross-sectional study design with convenience and snowball sampling was employed. Israeli preschool children aged 36–59 months (n = 399; 48.48 + 6.73) were recruited to two groups (typically developing [TD] n = 269; 47.65 + 6.78; referred n = 130; 50.09 + 6.35). The LDCDQ and a demographic questionnaire were completed for all children. The Movement Assessment Battery for Children, Second Edition (MABC2) was administered to n = 77 children (n = 24 TD). Receiver operating curves (ROCs) were used to investigate sensitivity and specificity, and propose cutoff scores.
Results
Internal consistency was confirmed (total score: ɑ = 0.922). Study groups differed significantly (p < 0.001) on LDCDQ total and subscores. The MABC2 and LDCDQ total scores were moderately correlated (r = 0.51; p < 0.001) suggesting concurrent validity. Binary logistic regressions revealed that the LDCDQ total and all subscores significantly predicted study group placement. Sensitivity (95–100 %), specificity (65–69 %), and proposed cutoff scores were established using ROC.
Conclusion
The LDCDQ is a valid, reliable and free-of-charge screening tool that can be used to identify preschool children showing early motor coordination difficulties, who may benefit from early motor development support, and who may ultimately need referral for DCD assessment.
{"title":"Updated psychometric assessment of the original Little Developmental Coordination Disorder Questionnaire (LDCDQ)","authors":"Tanya Rihtman , Miri Tal-Saban","doi":"10.1016/j.ridd.2026.105206","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ridd.2026.105206","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aim</h3><div>The Little Developmental Coordination Disorder Questionnaire (LDCDQ) is a screening tool for identifying preschool children who may have Developmental Coordination Disorder (DCD), originally developed in the Hebrew language. This study updated the original LDCDQ’s psychometric properties with an expanded sample size, and ascertained sensitivity, specificity and cutoff scores.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>An observational cross-sectional study design with convenience and snowball sampling was employed. Israeli preschool children aged 36–59 months (n = 399; 48.48 <u>+</u> 6.73) were recruited to two groups (typically developing [TD] n = 269; 47.65 <u>+</u> 6.78; referred n = 130; 50.09 <u>+</u> 6.35). The LDCDQ and a demographic questionnaire were completed for all children. The <em>Movement Assessment Battery for Children, Second Edition</em> (MABC2) was administered to n = 77 children (n = 24 TD). Receiver operating curves (ROCs) were used to investigate sensitivity and specificity, and propose cutoff scores.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Internal consistency was confirmed (total score: ɑ = 0.922). Study groups differed significantly (p < 0.001) on LDCDQ total and subscores. The MABC2 and LDCDQ total scores were moderately correlated (r = 0.51; p < 0.001) suggesting concurrent validity. Binary logistic regressions revealed that the LDCDQ total and all subscores significantly predicted study group placement. Sensitivity (95–100 %), specificity (65–69 %), and proposed cutoff scores were established using ROC.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The LDCDQ is a valid, reliable and free-of-charge screening tool that can be used to identify preschool children showing early motor coordination difficulties, who may benefit from early motor development support, and who may ultimately need referral for DCD assessment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51351,"journal":{"name":"Research in Developmental Disabilities","volume":"169 ","pages":"Article 105206"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2026-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145897923","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01DOI: 10.1016/j.ridd.2025.105199
Ramazan Mert Atan , Sedat Arslan , Kevser Tari Selcuk
Household food insecurity is associated with an increased risk of obesity in children and adolescents. Households that include children and adolescents with disabilities may be more vulnerable to food insecurity. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between household food insecurity and general and abdominal obesity in children and adolescents with disabilities. In this cross-sectional study, data was collected through face-to-face interviews from 106 parents and children/adolescents. To collect the data, the Descriptive Information Form and the Household Food Insecurity Access Scale were used. Body weight, height and waist circumference (WC) of children/adolescents were measured by the researchers. Body Mass Index Z score (BMIz), WC Z score (WCz) and waist-to-height ratio (WHtR) were calculated. The significance level of statistical tests was accepted as p < 0.05. Approximately 37.0 % of households were at risk of food insecurity. According to BMIz, approximately 19.0 % of the children and adolescents were overweight and 29.0 % were obese. Children and adolescents with WCz> +1 SD and WHtR≥ 0.5 were 46.2 % and 50.0 %, respectively. After adjusting for potential confounders, moderate and severe food insecurity was associated with higher odds of overweight and obesity according to the BMIz (AOR: 6.48, 95 % CI: 1.76;23.90, p:0.005), and WCz (AOR: 9.41, 95 % CI: 2.24;39.47, p:0.002). It was also associated with higher rates of abdominal obesity according to the WHtR (AOR: 7.12, 95 % CI: 1.74;29.20, p:0.006). Moderate/severe household food insecurity was found to be significantly associated with increased odds of general and abdominal obesity in children and adolescents with disabilities.
{"title":"Association of household food insecurity with overweight and obesity in children and adolescent with disabilities","authors":"Ramazan Mert Atan , Sedat Arslan , Kevser Tari Selcuk","doi":"10.1016/j.ridd.2025.105199","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ridd.2025.105199","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Household food insecurity is associated with an increased risk of obesity in children and adolescents. Households that include children and adolescents with disabilities may be more vulnerable to food insecurity. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between household food insecurity and general and abdominal obesity in children and adolescents with disabilities. In this cross-sectional study, data was collected through face-to-face interviews from 106 parents and children/adolescents. To collect the data, the Descriptive Information Form and the Household Food Insecurity Access Scale were used. Body weight, height and waist circumference (WC) of children/adolescents were measured by the researchers. Body Mass Index Z score (BMIz), WC Z score (WCz) and waist-to-height ratio (WHtR) were calculated. The significance level of statistical tests was accepted as p < 0.05. Approximately 37.0 % of households were at risk of food insecurity. According to BMIz, approximately 19.0 % of the children and adolescents were overweight and 29.0 % were obese. Children and adolescents with WCz> +1 SD and WHtR≥ 0.5 were 46.2 % and 50.0 %, respectively. After adjusting for potential confounders, moderate and severe food insecurity was associated with higher odds of overweight and obesity according to the BMIz (AOR: 6.48, 95 % CI: 1.76;23.90, p:0.005), and WCz (AOR: 9.41, 95 % CI: 2.24;39.47, p:0.002). It was also associated with higher rates of abdominal obesity according to the WHtR (AOR: 7.12, 95 % CI: 1.74;29.20, p:0.006). Moderate/severe household food insecurity was found to be significantly associated with increased odds of general and abdominal obesity in children and adolescents with disabilities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51351,"journal":{"name":"Research in Developmental Disabilities","volume":"168 ","pages":"Article 105199"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145866448","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}