Family Business Review最新文献

英文中文

Accumulating Knowledge Over Time: Introduction to the Fourth FBR Review Issue 随着时间积累知识：第四期FBR评论简介

IF 8.8 1区管理学 Q1 BUSINESS

Family Business Review

Pub Date : 2022-03-01 DOI: 10.1177/08944865221083075

Keith H. Brigham, Cristina Cruz Serrano, Nadine H. Kammerlander, J. Kotlar

We are honored to present the fourth Review Issue of Family Business Review (FBR). In 2016, FBR Editors Jeremy C. Short, Pramodita Sharma, Thomas Lumpkin, and Allison W. Pearson launched a series of special issues in FBR to track and understand the fast evolution of family business research produced since the early 1970s. With more than 2,000 family business articles published in the 1990s (Sharma, 2015), and more than 4,000 articles published between 2010 and 2014, they anticipated that the 2020s “would likely yield over 8,000 new peer-reviewed journal articles on family business” (Short et al., 2016, p. 11). Based on the Scopus database at the time we write this editorial (January 2022), we now found 20,041 document results containing the keyword “family business.” Clearly, as it stands, scholarly production on the subject has further grown, accelerating even beyond those ambitious expectations made just 5 years ago. This fast-growing trend raised the need to organize an increasingly diversified body of knowledge and shape the production of new knowledge in a way that adds and extends on what has been done before, to ultimately favor knowledge accumulation. Looking back to the previous FBR Review Issues offers us a privileged opportunity to reflect on the collective contribution that this stream of work has generated so far. Indeed, by screening and comparing the past FBR Review Issues, we found a wealth of interesting insights that we believe can yield precious directions for the future. In the editorial article of the inaugural FBR Special Issue, the Editors found indications that research on “family business is on the threshold of its next era” (Short et al., 2016, p. 12). The review articles contained in that issue outlined several promising directions to further and enrich family business scholarship, and the Editors further pointed to the promise of further reviews that look, for example, into specific methods and theories used in family business research, as well as cross-disciplinary approaches that bridge family business research with other fields such as family sciences, history, sociology, religious studies, anthropology, and psychology. Articles in this first FBR Review Issue elaborate on topics such as succession, philanthropy, governance from an agencyand steward-based perspective, exploration and exploitation, entrepreneurship, and empirical trends in family firm research. In the second FBR Review Issue, Editors Daniel T. Holt, Allison W. Pearson, Tyge Payne, and Pramodita Sharma continued to build on this legacy (Holt et al., 2018), placing their attention to the opportunities for cross-pollination between family business scholarship and the broadly diversified domains of management research. In a sense, this Editorial article captures the growing interest of family business researchers to move from the sidelines to a more central and foundational position in mainstream management research, offering several promising ways to ful

我们很荣幸为您呈现《家族企业评论》第四期评论。2016年，FBR编辑Jeremy C.Short、Pramodita Sharma、Thomas Lumpkin和Allison W.Pearson在FBR上推出了一系列特刊，以跟踪和了解自20世纪70年代初以来家族企业研究的快速发展。20世纪90年代发表了2000多篇家族企业文章（Sharma，2015），2010年至2014年间发表了4000多篇文章，他们预计20世纪20年代“可能会产生8000多篇关于家族企业的新的同行评审期刊文章”（Short等人，2016，第11页）。根据我们撰写这篇社论时（2022年1月）的Scopus数据库，我们现在发现了20041份包含关键词“家族企业”的文献结果。很明显，就目前情况来看，该主题的学术成果进一步增长，甚至超过了5年前的宏伟预期。这一快速增长的趋势提出了组织日益多样化的知识体系的必要性，并以一种在以前所做的基础上增加和扩展的方式来塑造新知识的生产，以最终有利于知识积累。回顾之前的FBR审查问题，我们有机会反思到目前为止这一工作流所产生的集体贡献。事实上，通过筛选和比较过去的FBR审查问题，我们发现了大量有趣的见解，我们相信这些见解可以为未来带来宝贵的方向。在《FBR》创刊特刊的社论中，编辑们发现有迹象表明，对“家族企业正处于下一个时代的门槛”的研究（Short等人，2016，第12页）。该期的评论文章概述了进一步丰富家族企业学术的几个有希望的方向，编辑们进一步指出了进一步评论的前景，例如，研究家族企业研究中使用的具体方法和理论，以及将家族企业研究与其他领域（如家庭科学、历史、社会学、宗教研究、人类学和心理学）联系起来的跨学科方法。第一期FBR评论中的文章详细阐述了继承、慈善事业、从机构和管家的角度进行治理、探索和利用、创业以及家族企业研究的经验趋势等主题。在第二期《FBR评论》中，编辑Daniel T.Holt、Allison W.Pearson、Tyge Payne和Pramodita Sharma继续在这一遗产的基础上发展（Holt et al.，2018），将他们的注意力放在家族企业学术和广泛多样化的管理研究领域之间的交叉授粉机会上。从某种意义上说，这篇社论文章抓住了家族企业研究人员日益增长的兴趣，他们希望在主流管理研究中从副业转向更核心、更基础的地位，为实现这一抱负提供了几种有希望的方法。在本期中，回顾了（家族企业）关于家族企业中非家族成员、咨询、制度背景和社会情感财富的文献。最后，在第三期FBR评论中，编辑Peter Jaskiewicz、Donald O.Neubaum、Alfredo De Massis和Daniel T.Holt开始描绘家族企业研究的“成年”阶段（Jaskiewich等人，2020）。他们发现了证据，证明该领域已经成熟，获得了合法性，例如越来越多地采用其他学科产生的主流理论，以及建立家族企业的新“本土”理论，为更广泛的管理辩论提供信息。有趣的是，研究重点从家族企业的角度转移了（如1083075 FBRXXX10.1177/08944865221083075《家族企业评论》Brigham et al.research-article2022

{"title":"Accumulating Knowledge Over Time: Introduction to the Fourth FBR Review Issue","authors":"Keith H. Brigham, Cristina Cruz Serrano, Nadine H. Kammerlander, J. Kotlar","doi":"10.1177/08944865221083075","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08944865221083075","url":null,"abstract":"We are honored to present the fourth Review Issue of Family Business Review (FBR). In 2016, FBR Editors Jeremy C. Short, Pramodita Sharma, Thomas Lumpkin, and Allison W. Pearson launched a series of special issues in FBR to track and understand the fast evolution of family business research produced since the early 1970s. With more than 2,000 family business articles published in the 1990s (Sharma, 2015), and more than 4,000 articles published between 2010 and 2014, they anticipated that the 2020s “would likely yield over 8,000 new peer-reviewed journal articles on family business” (Short et al., 2016, p. 11). Based on the Scopus database at the time we write this editorial (January 2022), we now found 20,041 document results containing the keyword “family business.” Clearly, as it stands, scholarly production on the subject has further grown, accelerating even beyond those ambitious expectations made just 5 years ago. This fast-growing trend raised the need to organize an increasingly diversified body of knowledge and shape the production of new knowledge in a way that adds and extends on what has been done before, to ultimately favor knowledge accumulation. Looking back to the previous FBR Review Issues offers us a privileged opportunity to reflect on the collective contribution that this stream of work has generated so far. Indeed, by screening and comparing the past FBR Review Issues, we found a wealth of interesting insights that we believe can yield precious directions for the future. In the editorial article of the inaugural FBR Special Issue, the Editors found indications that research on “family business is on the threshold of its next era” (Short et al., 2016, p. 12). The review articles contained in that issue outlined several promising directions to further and enrich family business scholarship, and the Editors further pointed to the promise of further reviews that look, for example, into specific methods and theories used in family business research, as well as cross-disciplinary approaches that bridge family business research with other fields such as family sciences, history, sociology, religious studies, anthropology, and psychology. Articles in this first FBR Review Issue elaborate on topics such as succession, philanthropy, governance from an agencyand steward-based perspective, exploration and exploitation, entrepreneurship, and empirical trends in family firm research. In the second FBR Review Issue, Editors Daniel T. Holt, Allison W. Pearson, Tyge Payne, and Pramodita Sharma continued to build on this legacy (Holt et al., 2018), placing their attention to the opportunities for cross-pollination between family business scholarship and the broadly diversified domains of management research. In a sense, this Editorial article captures the growing interest of family business researchers to move from the sidelines to a more central and foundational position in mainstream management research, offering several promising ways to ful","PeriodicalId":51365,"journal":{"name":"Family Business Review","volume":"35 1","pages":"6 - 14"},"PeriodicalIF":8.8,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49379345","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Generations in Family Business: A Multifield Review and Future Research Agenda 家族企业中的几代人：多领域回顾和未来研究议程

IF 8.8 1区管理学 Q1 BUSINESS

Family Business Review

Pub Date : 2022-01-20 DOI: 10.1177/08944865211069781

Vittoria Magrelli, P. Rovelli, Carlotta Benedetti, Ruth Überbacher, Alfredo De Massis

The concept of generations has become increasingly important in the social science fields to explain diverse phenomena affecting organizations. This is especially true in the family business field where generations are considered a constitutive element. Nevertheless, there is still a limited understanding of generations and the implications of their involvement in family business. We review prior studies on generations by considering different social science fields, which we analyze according to a novel theoretical framework. Building on this framework, and placing particular emphasis on family firms, we identify important knowledge gaps that serve as a springboard for future research.

代际概念在社会科学领域变得越来越重要，用来解释影响组织的各种现象。在家族企业领域尤其如此，在家族企业中，几代人被视为构成要素。尽管如此，对几代人及其参与家族企业的影响的了解仍然有限。我们通过考虑不同的社会科学领域来回顾先前关于世代的研究，并根据一个新颖的理论框架进行分析。在这个框架的基础上，并特别强调家族企业，我们确定了重要的知识差距，这些差距是未来研究的跳板。

引用次数: 22

Family Firms and Environmental Performance: A Meta-Analytic Review 家族企业与环境绩效:元分析综述

IF 8.8 1区管理学 Q1 BUSINESS

Family Business Review

Pub Date : 2022-01-20 DOI: 10.1177/08944865211064409

Ivan Miroshnychenko, Alfredo De Massis, R. Barontini, F. Testa

This article critically reviews and meta-analyzes the environmental performance of family firms. Using a sample of 40,910 firms covering a 12-year period, we conclude that the average effect of family involvement on environmental performance is negative, albeit small. This negative effect is more pronounced in primary studies that measure environmental performance via the environmental operational practices adopted and in those that define family business using the family ownership and management criteria. Our findings suggest that from an agency perspective, and compared with nonfamily firms, the negative view of the environmental performance of family firms prevails over the positive view.

本文对家族企业的环境绩效进行了批判性的回顾和元分析。通过对40910家公司12年的样本分析，我们得出结论，家族参与对环境绩效的平均影响是负的，尽管影响很小。这种负面影响在通过所采用的环境操作做法来衡量环境绩效的初步研究和使用家族所有权和管理标准来定义家族企业的研究中更为明显。我们的研究结果表明，从代理角度来看，与非家族企业相比，家族企业环境绩效的负面观点占主导地位。

引用次数: 13

Toward a Family Science Perspective on Executive Compensation in Family Firms: A Review and Research Agenda 家族企业高管薪酬的家族科学视角：回顾与研究议程

IF 8.8 1区管理学 Q1 BUSINESS

Family Business Review

Pub Date : 2021-12-27 DOI: 10.1177/08944865211064410

Anneleen Michiels, Isabel C. Botero, Roland E. Kidwell

In family firms, the family often plays a central role in the strategic decisions of the business. However, until recently, research has primarily focused on exploring the role that business factors play in firm decision-making, with less attention given to the role of the family system. This article reviews the research on executive compensation in family firms to understand whether and how the family system has been considered within this work. Guided by the application of family science theories, we provide a framework to explain why it is important to incorporate the family system in the future study of executive compensation in family firms. We conclude by discussing a research agenda outlining how elements of the family system can be integrated into future executive compensation research to inspire scholars to think differently about this important research topic.

在家族企业中，家族往往在企业的战略决策中发挥着核心作用。然而，直到最近，研究主要集中在探索商业因素在企业决策中的作用，而很少关注家族系统的作用。本文回顾了家族企业高管薪酬的研究，以了解在这项工作中是否以及如何考虑家族制度。在家族科学理论应用的指导下，我们提供了一个框架来解释为什么将家族制度纳入家族企业高管薪酬的未来研究中很重要。最后，我们讨论了一项研究议程，概述了如何将家庭制度的要素纳入未来的高管薪酬研究，以激励学者对这一重要研究主题进行不同的思考。

引用次数: 5

Willing and Able? The Screening and Adoption of Habitual Family Venture Opportunities 愿意并且有能力?习惯性家庭创业机会的筛选与采用

IF 8.8 1区管理学 Q1 BUSINESS

Family Business Review

Pub Date : 2021-12-07 DOI: 10.1177/08944865211059467

James M. Vardaman, Erik T. Markin, Christopher R. Penney, Laura E. Marler, D. Mckee

This article develops a two-part theoretical framework synthesizing the socioemotional wealth (SEW) perspective with image theory to explain the ways in which family decision makers screen and potentially adopt habitual new venture opportunities. The model theorizes that opportunities are initially screened according to their ability to preserve SEW and fit with the family’s value images and subsequently explains how SEW willingness interacts with the family entrepreneur’s trajectory and strategic images to predict whether the venture will be pursued as a serial or portfolio opportunity. Theoretical implications and directions for future research are also discussed.

本文发展了一个由两部分组成的理论框架，综合了社会情感财富(SEW)视角和形象理论，以解释家庭决策者筛选和潜在地采用习惯性新风险机会的方式。该模型的理论是，机会最初是根据他们保留SEW和符合家族价值形象的能力来筛选的，随后解释了SEW意愿如何与家族企业家的轨迹和战略形象相互作用，以预测企业是作为系列机会还是投资组合机会。讨论了未来研究的理论意义和方向。

引用次数: 1

The Effect of Ownership Structure on Disclosure Quality and Credit Ratings in Family Firms: The Moderating Role of Auditor Choice 股权结构对家族企业信息披露质量和信用评级的影响:审计师选择的调节作用

IF 8.8 1区管理学 Q1 BUSINESS

Family Business Review

Pub Date : 2021-12-07 DOI: 10.1177/08944865211057854

Jengfang Chen, Ni-Yun Chen, Liyu He, C. Patel

Despite the substantial degree of heterogeneity within family firms, little is known about how their heterogeneity affects firm behavior and the implication for the shareholder–debtholder agency problem. Our study contributes to the literature by examining whether family firms with a higher level of control-ownership divergence would disclose less information and whether Big 4 auditors play a moderating role in mitigating the negative impact of control-ownership divergence on disclosure quality resulting in improved credit ratings. Using data from the emerging economy of Taiwan, we provide support for our three hypotheses. Our contributions will interest family firm owners, researchers, auditors, and policymakers.

尽管家族企业内部存在很大程度的异质性，但人们对家族企业的异质性如何影响企业行为及其对股东-债务人代理问题的影响知之甚少。我们的研究通过考察控制-所有权差异水平较高的家族企业是否会披露更少的信息，以及四大会计师事务所是否在缓解控制-所有权差异对披露质量的负面影响(从而提高信用评级)方面发挥了调节作用，从而为文献做出了贡献。利用台湾新兴经济体的数据，我们为我们的三个假设提供了支持。我们的贡献将引起家族企业所有者、研究人员、审计人员和政策制定者的兴趣。

引用次数: 6

Family Firms, Family Boundary Organizations, and the Family-Related Organizational Ecosystem 家族企业、家族边界组织与家族相关组织生态系统

IF 8.8 1区管理学 Q1 BUSINESS

Family Business Review

Pub Date : 2021-10-26 DOI: 10.1177/08944865211052195

Alfredo De Massis, J. Kotlar, Luca Manelli

While entrepreneurial families often expand their activity over multiple businesses and patrimonial assets, this complexity is rarely addressed in mainstream family business research, where the predominant focus is on the family business or, at best, on the family controlling the operational business. We advance a more holistic understanding of entrepreneurial families that contemplates the variety of assets they create or acquire over time that jointly generate financial and socioemotional wealth for the family, and call for attention to the variety of organizations that entrepreneurial families establish to preserve, manage, and/or administer such assets. We theorize that each of these organizations can be devised as a family boundary organization (FBO), which operates at the interface of the entrepreneurial family and other systems, and such FBOs form a family-related organizational ecosystem. We propose a new framework that extends the scope of research beyond the family business and focuses more directly on entrepreneurial families and on the boundaries between the entrepreneurial family, its multiple assets, and the FBOs in the family-related organizational ecosystem. This framework paves the ground to extend the three-circle model, broadening the scope of family business research to consider a wider range of organizations besides the family firm, such as family foundations, family business foundations, family offices, family holdings, family academies, and family museums. Drawing on the organizational boundaries literature, we integrate organizational boundaries in the theory of the family firm and propose a research agenda to examine the entrepreneurial family and its assets in a broader way.

虽然创业家族通常将其活动扩展到多个企业和继承资产上，但主流家族企业研究很少涉及这种复杂性，因为主流家族企业的主要关注点是家族企业，或者充其量是控制运营企业的家族。我们对创业家庭有了更全面的理解，考虑到他们随着时间的推移创造或获得的各种资产，这些资产共同为家庭创造了经济和社会情感财富，并呼吁关注创业家庭为保护、管理和/或管理这些资产而建立的各种组织。我们的理论是，这些组织中的每一个都可以被设计为家族边界组织（FBO），它在创业家族和其他系统的界面上运作，这些FBO形成了一个与家族相关的组织生态系统。我们提出了一个新的框架，将研究范围扩展到家族企业之外，更直接地关注创业家族，以及创业家族、其多重资产和家族相关组织生态系统中FBO之间的边界。该框架为扩展三环模型奠定了基础，拓宽了家族企业研究的范围，以考虑家族企业之外的更广泛的组织，如家族基金会、家族企业基金会、家庭办公室、家族控股、家族学院和家族博物馆。在组织边界文献的基础上，我们将组织边界纳入家族企业理论，并提出了一个研究议程，以更广泛的方式审视创业家族及其资产。

{"title":"Family Firms, Family Boundary Organizations, and the Family-Related Organizational Ecosystem","authors":"Alfredo De Massis, J. Kotlar, Luca Manelli","doi":"10.1177/08944865211052195","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08944865211052195","url":null,"abstract":"While entrepreneurial families often expand their activity over multiple businesses and patrimonial assets, this complexity is rarely addressed in mainstream family business research, where the predominant focus is on the family business or, at best, on the family controlling the operational business. We advance a more holistic understanding of entrepreneurial families that contemplates the variety of assets they create or acquire over time that jointly generate financial and socioemotional wealth for the family, and call for attention to the variety of organizations that entrepreneurial families establish to preserve, manage, and/or administer such assets. We theorize that each of these organizations can be devised as a family boundary organization (FBO), which operates at the interface of the entrepreneurial family and other systems, and such FBOs form a family-related organizational ecosystem. We propose a new framework that extends the scope of research beyond the family business and focuses more directly on entrepreneurial families and on the boundaries between the entrepreneurial family, its multiple assets, and the FBOs in the family-related organizational ecosystem. This framework paves the ground to extend the three-circle model, broadening the scope of family business research to consider a wider range of organizations besides the family firm, such as family foundations, family business foundations, family offices, family holdings, family academies, and family museums. Drawing on the organizational boundaries literature, we integrate organizational boundaries in the theory of the family firm and propose a research agenda to examine the entrepreneurial family and its assets in a broader way.","PeriodicalId":51365,"journal":{"name":"Family Business Review","volume":"34 1","pages":"350 - 364"},"PeriodicalIF":8.8,"publicationDate":"2021-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41477118","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 15

“Over My Dead Body”: Wives’ Influence in Family Business Succession “在我死后”:妻子对家族企业继承的影响

IF 8.8 1区管理学 Q1 BUSINESS

Family Business Review

Pub Date : 2021-10-21 DOI: 10.1177/08944865211051148

B. Cosson, M. Gilding

The family business literature barely addresses wives’ influence in family business succession. Where it does so, the result is often tokenistic, stereotypical, and imprecise. Drawing on 34 in-depth interviews, this article makes three contributions. First, it identifies wives’ critical influence in family business succession through socialization across the life span of the family business; specifically, through normative, interactive, and experiential socialization. Second, it demonstrates the diverse dynamics and impact of wives’ influence on family business continuity. Third, it highlights the particular significance of experiential socialization, whereby changing expectations of marriage and family life have amplified wives’ influence in succession outcomes.

家族企业文献几乎没有提到妻子对家族企业继承的影响。当它这样做的时候，结果往往是象征性的、刻板的和不精确的。通过对34个深度访谈，本文做出了三点贡献。首先，它确定了妻子在家族企业的整个生命周期中通过社会化对家族企业继承的关键影响;具体来说，是通过规范的、互动的和体验式的社会化。其次，它展示了妻子对家族企业连续性的影响的不同动态和影响。第三，它强调了经验社会化的特殊意义，即改变对婚姻和家庭生活的期望放大了妻子对继承结果的影响。

引用次数: 4

Out of the Comfort Zone! Family Leaders’ Subsidiary Ownership Choices and the Role of Vulnerabilities 走出舒适区!家族领导人的子公司所有权选择与脆弱性的作用

IF 8.8 1区管理学 Q1 BUSINESS

Family Business Review

Pub Date : 2021-10-15 DOI: 10.1177/08944865211050858

Claudia Pongelli, A. Calabrò, Fabio Quarato, A. Minichilli, G. Corbetta

Based on the socioemotional wealth approach and a sample of 3,904 subsidiary ownership choices made by 586 family firms, this study shows that family-managed firms (i.e., those family firms with a family member in a leadership position) prefer wholly owned subsidies over joint ventures when entering foreign markets. Family-managed firms are also more likely to revise their subsidiary ownership choices and form joint ventures when in vulnerability conditions, that is, when they experience performance below aspirations and when entering a culturally distant market.

基于社会情感财富方法和586家家族企业的3,904个子公司所有权选择样本，本研究表明，家族管理企业(即家族成员担任领导职位的家族企业)在进入国外市场时更倾向于全资补贴而不是合资企业。家族管理的公司也更有可能在脆弱的条件下，即当他们的业绩低于期望和进入一个文化上遥远的市场时，修改其子公司所有权选择和组建合资企业。

引用次数: 8

Endogeneity Issues in Family Business Research: Current Status and Future Recommendations 家族企业研究的内生性问题:现状与未来建议

IF 8.8 1区管理学 Q1 BUSINESS

Family Business Review

Pub Date : 2021-10-06 DOI: 10.1177/08944865211049092

Xinrui Zhang, H. Fang, Junsheng Dou, James J. Chrisman

Although the family business research field and related disciplines are paying increasing attention to improvements in methodology, there is still insufficient attention being paid to endogeneity issues. We therefore raise awareness of endogeneity and suggest ways to reduce biased results in family business studies. We review publications in the family business literature in terms of (1) the consideration of endogeneity issues, (2) sources of endogeneity for different research topics, and (3) various methods that researchers have used to control for endogeneity. We discuss important lessons learned from the review and offer methodologically oriented recommendations for future family business studies.

虽然家族企业研究领域和相关学科越来越重视方法的改进，但对内生性问题的关注仍然不足。因此，我们提高对内生性的认识，并提出减少家族企业研究中有偏见的结果的方法。我们从以下几个方面回顾了家族企业文献中的出版物:(1)对内生性问题的考虑，(2)不同研究主题的内生性来源，以及(3)研究人员用来控制内生性的各种方法。我们讨论了从回顾中获得的重要经验教训，并为未来的家族企业研究提供了方法论上的建议。

引用次数: 8

首页上一页

下一页尾页

类型

全部化学•材料生命科学医学物理工程技术环境•农林材料科学地球科学法学管理学化学环境科学与生态学计算机科学教育学经济学农林科学人文科学生物学数学物理与天体物理心理学综合性期刊其他工业工程理学历史学农学文学信息工程

数据库

全部 ACS Publications Elsevier ieeexplore Springer The Royal Society of Chemistry Wiley

期刊

Family Business Review

全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.

﹀