{"title":"Climate Justice and the University: Shaping a Hopeful Future for All. By Jennie C, Stephens, Johns Hopkins University Press, 2024. 286 pp. $36.95 (Hardcover) $36.95 (E-book)","authors":"Laurie E. Adkin","doi":"10.1111/1468-4446.70047","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.70047","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":51368,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Sociology","volume":"76 5","pages":"1214-1215"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145646405","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Book Review: The Price Is Wrong: Why Capitalism Won’t Save the Planet. By Brett Christophers, London, UK: Verso Books, 2024","authors":"Benjamin H. Bradlow","doi":"10.1111/1468-4446.70052","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.70052","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":51368,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Sociology","volume":"77 1","pages":"170-172"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145969881","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The authors regret that, due to a coding error, the measure of parental leave was incorrect for graduates taking leave from 2017. Correcting this error increases the number of social scientists with registered parental leave from 383 to 428.
Re-estimated models using the corrected measure closely replicate the published results. The study's conclusions remain unchanged, with one exception: the main effect of parental leave reported in Table 4 (Model 6) is no longer statistically significant. However, consistent with the published version, the interaction between gender and parental leave remains statistically significant, indicating that parental leave negatively predicts women's advancement more than men's (interaction coefficient: −0.305, 95% CI: −0.532 to −0.077).
The updated KHB decomposition (Table 5) also mirrors the published results. Parental leave now accounts for the largest share of the indirect effect (18.56% vs. 14.63% in the published results), followed by coauthor-adjusted articles (17.13% vs. 17.43% in the published results). In total, 43.42% of the gender gap in advancement is mediated by parent- and productivity-related factors (vs. 39.71% in the published results).
Figures 2 and 3 have been updated to reflect the corrected estimates: predicted probabilities of attaining a senior research position from regressions adjusting for parental leave and performance (Figure 2, panels B and C) and predicted probabilities of attaining a senior research position by months of parental leave (Figure 3, panels A and B). Complete regression tables with corrected estimates are available in Supporting Information S1.
The authors apologize for any inconvenience this error may have caused.
{"title":"Corrigendum to “Getting Ahead in the Social Sciences: How Parenthood and Publishing Contribute to Gender Gaps in Academic Career Advancement” [British Journal of Sociology, 2024 (March), Vol. 75: 322–346]","authors":"","doi":"10.1111/1468-4446.70043","DOIUrl":"10.1111/1468-4446.70043","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The authors regret that, due to a coding error, the measure of parental leave was incorrect for graduates taking leave from 2017. Correcting this error increases the number of social scientists with registered parental leave from 383 to 428.</p><p>Re-estimated models using the corrected measure closely replicate the published results. The study's conclusions remain unchanged, with one exception: the main effect of parental leave reported in Table 4 (Model 6) is no longer statistically significant. However, consistent with the published version, the interaction between gender and parental leave remains statistically significant, indicating that parental leave negatively predicts women's advancement more than men's (interaction coefficient: −0.305, 95% CI: −0.532 to −0.077).</p><p>The updated KHB decomposition (Table 5) also mirrors the published results. Parental leave now accounts for the largest share of the indirect effect (18.56% vs. 14.63% in the published results), followed by coauthor-adjusted articles (17.13% vs. 17.43% in the published results). In total, 43.42% of the gender gap in advancement is mediated by parent- and productivity-related factors (vs. 39.71% in the published results).</p><p>Figures 2 and 3 have been updated to reflect the corrected estimates: predicted probabilities of attaining a senior research position from regressions adjusting for parental leave and performance (Figure 2, panels B and C) and predicted probabilities of attaining a senior research position by months of parental leave (Figure 3, panels A and B). Complete regression tables with corrected estimates are available in Supporting Information S1.</p><p>The authors apologize for any inconvenience this error may have caused.</p>","PeriodicalId":51368,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Sociology","volume":"77 1","pages":"182-184"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1468-4446.70043","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145281631","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Family financial assistance with home ownership has attracted significant scholarly attention in recent years. However, the role of culture and ethnicity, transnational ties, and migration in this practice remains significantly under-addressed. By drawing on interviews conducted with donors and recipients of family financial assistance with home ownership in Australia who had personal and recent family experiences of migration, this article begins to address this topic. The findings show that participants from migrant backgrounds often evoke culture and ethnicity while discussing family cultures of transmission and cultural preferences for owner occupied housing, and that they use culture as a means of deflecting potentially uncomfortable questions about fairness and equity. The findings also suggest that family financial assistance can be considered to facilitate a final stage of migrant settling which may take place years after the migrant arrives in Australia. Finally, the findings show that transnational families remain highly interconnected both emotionally and financially, and may provide financial assistance with home ownership as part of family wealth strategies through which transnational families pool resources for collective advantage. Drawing on these findings, the article shows that migration plays a crucial, and underappreciated, role in the provision and receipt of family financial assistance with home ownership. It ultimately argues that popular conversations and academic studies in the multicultural societies in which debates about the asset economy are most active (the US, the UK, Australia) have been dominated by Anglo-centric experiences, and have not considered how these arrangements may extend beyond national borders, and invites scholars in this area to more fully consider the role of migration in research on families and wealth.
{"title":"Understanding the Role of Migration, Culture and Transnational Ties in Family Financial Assistance With Home Ownership.","authors":"Julia Cook","doi":"10.1111/1468-4446.70040","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.70040","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Family financial assistance with home ownership has attracted significant scholarly attention in recent years. However, the role of culture and ethnicity, transnational ties, and migration in this practice remains significantly under-addressed. By drawing on interviews conducted with donors and recipients of family financial assistance with home ownership in Australia who had personal and recent family experiences of migration, this article begins to address this topic. The findings show that participants from migrant backgrounds often evoke culture and ethnicity while discussing family cultures of transmission and cultural preferences for owner occupied housing, and that they use culture as a means of deflecting potentially uncomfortable questions about fairness and equity. The findings also suggest that family financial assistance can be considered to facilitate a final stage of migrant settling which may take place years after the migrant arrives in Australia. Finally, the findings show that transnational families remain highly interconnected both emotionally and financially, and may provide financial assistance with home ownership as part of family wealth strategies through which transnational families pool resources for collective advantage. Drawing on these findings, the article shows that migration plays a crucial, and underappreciated, role in the provision and receipt of family financial assistance with home ownership. It ultimately argues that popular conversations and academic studies in the multicultural societies in which debates about the asset economy are most active (the US, the UK, Australia) have been dominated by Anglo-centric experiences, and have not considered how these arrangements may extend beyond national borders, and invites scholars in this area to more fully consider the role of migration in research on families and wealth.</p>","PeriodicalId":51368,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Sociology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145276805","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Romantic repartnering in later life has received substantial scholarly and public attention in light of population aging and changes in family dynamics. In the United States, the importance of household wealth as a means to support basic welfare needs means that questions of dating and repartnering are complicated by financial considerations. This is particularly true with regard to preserving family wealth for children and grandchildren. Drawing on in-depth interviews and focus groups with 68 adults aged 55 to 92 in Phoenix, Arizona, we explore older adults' concerns about wealth in their decisions to date and repartner. Respondents describe desires to protect wealth for future generations and to evade financial tensions in intergenerational relationships. In this context, many respondents see new romantic partnerships as a potential threat to their control over family wealth. Faced with these concerns, older adults adopt relationship strategies designed to maintain some informality in their relationships-living apart together and no government marriage-which they believe will help them avoid the financial repercussions of repartnering. These findings highlight how older adults balance family concerns and plans about financial transfers with desires to date and repartner in later life. While previous research highlights the ways that marriage shapes wealth accumulation over the life-course, these findings suggest the opposite may also be true. For older adults seeking to repartner, a lifetime of accumulated assets-and the desire to transmit these to kin-may shape the types of romantic relationships they pursue, and in particular, may lead to avoiding formalizing new relationships through marriage.
{"title":"Staying Apart for the Kids? Older American Daters and the Preservation of Family Wealth.","authors":"Cassandra Cotton, Raphaël Charron-Chénier","doi":"10.1111/1468-4446.70036","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.70036","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Romantic repartnering in later life has received substantial scholarly and public attention in light of population aging and changes in family dynamics. In the United States, the importance of household wealth as a means to support basic welfare needs means that questions of dating and repartnering are complicated by financial considerations. This is particularly true with regard to preserving family wealth for children and grandchildren. Drawing on in-depth interviews and focus groups with 68 adults aged 55 to 92 in Phoenix, Arizona, we explore older adults' concerns about wealth in their decisions to date and repartner. Respondents describe desires to protect wealth for future generations and to evade financial tensions in intergenerational relationships. In this context, many respondents see new romantic partnerships as a potential threat to their control over family wealth. Faced with these concerns, older adults adopt relationship strategies designed to maintain some informality in their relationships-living apart together and no government marriage-which they believe will help them avoid the financial repercussions of repartnering. These findings highlight how older adults balance family concerns and plans about financial transfers with desires to date and repartner in later life. While previous research highlights the ways that marriage shapes wealth accumulation over the life-course, these findings suggest the opposite may also be true. For older adults seeking to repartner, a lifetime of accumulated assets-and the desire to transmit these to kin-may shape the types of romantic relationships they pursue, and in particular, may lead to avoiding formalizing new relationships through marriage.</p>","PeriodicalId":51368,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Sociology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145253678","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Prior literature on gender and wealth accumulation largely examines the role of families in reproducing inequalities. However, less attention has been paid to families without sons, a significant demographic, particularly within China's one-child generation, that challenges conventional understandings of familial wealth dynamics. This study addresses this gap by proposing a new conceptual framework: families as sequential and interconnected sites and agents of wealth accumulation across the life course. It specifically applies this framework to investigate the experiences of siblingless daughters from China's one-child generation. Drawing upon 82 individual interviews, this research argues that families are dynamic and sequentially unfolding sites of wealth transfers, acting as both enablers and limiters of women's wealth accumulation. This perspective reveals how family structures, resources, and roles transform and interact at various life-course stages. The findings demonstrate that siblingless daughters are significant recipients of wealth transfers-including cash, valuables, and property-from multiple givers across key life-course stages such as university education, career entry, and marriage and childbirth. While wealth transfers within natal families are often relatively uncontested, access to marital wealth remains highly contingent on women's adherence to patriarchal expectations, particularly childbearing and the production of male heirs. By highlighting a life-course lens and the evolving, relational nature of family-based wealth transfers, this study exposes consistent yet competing relationships and power dynamics. It reveals instances of merit-based opportunity within these dynamics, alongside the reinforcement of enduring patriarchal constraints. This new conceptualisation not only allows for a deeper examination of persistent patriarchal constraints as they evolve and accumulate across life-course points, but also exposes niche spaces where some women negotiate and potentially subvert these constraints to accumulate wealth. Therefore, this study advances research on gender and wealth by illuminating the complex interplay of familial relationships, resources, and roles across the sequential life course.
{"title":"Gender, Families, and Wealth Accumulation Among the One-Child Generation.","authors":"Ye Liu","doi":"10.1111/1468-4446.70038","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.70038","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Prior literature on gender and wealth accumulation largely examines the role of families in reproducing inequalities. However, less attention has been paid to families without sons, a significant demographic, particularly within China's one-child generation, that challenges conventional understandings of familial wealth dynamics. This study addresses this gap by proposing a new conceptual framework: families as sequential and interconnected sites and agents of wealth accumulation across the life course. It specifically applies this framework to investigate the experiences of siblingless daughters from China's one-child generation. Drawing upon 82 individual interviews, this research argues that families are dynamic and sequentially unfolding sites of wealth transfers, acting as both enablers and limiters of women's wealth accumulation. This perspective reveals how family structures, resources, and roles transform and interact at various life-course stages. The findings demonstrate that siblingless daughters are significant recipients of wealth transfers-including cash, valuables, and property-from multiple givers across key life-course stages such as university education, career entry, and marriage and childbirth. While wealth transfers within natal families are often relatively uncontested, access to marital wealth remains highly contingent on women's adherence to patriarchal expectations, particularly childbearing and the production of male heirs. By highlighting a life-course lens and the evolving, relational nature of family-based wealth transfers, this study exposes consistent yet competing relationships and power dynamics. It reveals instances of merit-based opportunity within these dynamics, alongside the reinforcement of enduring patriarchal constraints. This new conceptualisation not only allows for a deeper examination of persistent patriarchal constraints as they evolve and accumulate across life-course points, but also exposes niche spaces where some women negotiate and potentially subvert these constraints to accumulate wealth. Therefore, this study advances research on gender and wealth by illuminating the complex interplay of familial relationships, resources, and roles across the sequential life course.</p>","PeriodicalId":51368,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Sociology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145240286","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}