首页 > 最新文献

British Journal of Sociology最新文献

英文 中文
Understanding the Role of Migration, Culture and Transnational Ties in Family Financial Assistance With Home Ownership. 了解移民,文化和跨国关系在家庭经济援助与住房所有权中的作用。
IF 3.3 2区 社会学 Q1 SOCIOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-10-11 DOI: 10.1111/1468-4446.70040
Julia Cook

Family financial assistance with home ownership has attracted significant scholarly attention in recent years. However, the role of culture and ethnicity, transnational ties, and migration in this practice remains significantly under-addressed. By drawing on interviews conducted with donors and recipients of family financial assistance with home ownership in Australia who had personal and recent family experiences of migration, this article begins to address this topic. The findings show that participants from migrant backgrounds often evoke culture and ethnicity while discussing family cultures of transmission and cultural preferences for owner occupied housing, and that they use culture as a means of deflecting potentially uncomfortable questions about fairness and equity. The findings also suggest that family financial assistance can be considered to facilitate a final stage of migrant settling which may take place years after the migrant arrives in Australia. Finally, the findings show that transnational families remain highly interconnected both emotionally and financially, and may provide financial assistance with home ownership as part of family wealth strategies through which transnational families pool resources for collective advantage. Drawing on these findings, the article shows that migration plays a crucial, and underappreciated, role in the provision and receipt of family financial assistance with home ownership. It ultimately argues that popular conversations and academic studies in the multicultural societies in which debates about the asset economy are most active (the US, the UK, Australia) have been dominated by Anglo-centric experiences, and have not considered how these arrangements may extend beyond national borders, and invites scholars in this area to more fully consider the role of migration in research on families and wealth.

近年来,拥有住房的家庭经济援助引起了学术界的广泛关注。然而,文化和种族、跨国关系和移民在这一实践中的作用仍未得到充分重视。通过对在澳大利亚拥有住房的家庭财政援助的捐助者和接受者进行访谈,这些人有个人和最近的家庭移民经历,本文开始讨论这个话题。研究结果表明,来自移民背景的参与者在讨论家庭文化的传播和对自有住房的文化偏好时,经常会提到文化和种族,他们利用文化作为转移有关公平和公平的潜在令人不安的问题的手段。研究结果还表明,可以考虑家庭经济援助,以促进移民定居的最后阶段,这可能发生在移民抵达澳大利亚数年后。最后,研究结果表明,跨国家庭在情感上和经济上都保持着高度的联系,并可能提供房屋所有权的经济援助,作为家庭财富战略的一部分,跨国家庭通过这些战略汇集资源以实现集体利益。根据这些调查结果,本文表明,移民在提供和接受拥有住房的家庭经济援助方面发挥着至关重要的作用,但这一作用并未得到充分认识。它最终认为,在多元文化社会中,关于资产经济的辩论最为活跃(美国、英国、澳大利亚),流行的对话和学术研究一直被盎格鲁中心的经验所主导,没有考虑到这些安排如何超越国界,并邀请该领域的学者更充分地考虑移民在家庭和财富研究中的作用。
{"title":"Understanding the Role of Migration, Culture and Transnational Ties in Family Financial Assistance With Home Ownership.","authors":"Julia Cook","doi":"10.1111/1468-4446.70040","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.70040","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Family financial assistance with home ownership has attracted significant scholarly attention in recent years. However, the role of culture and ethnicity, transnational ties, and migration in this practice remains significantly under-addressed. By drawing on interviews conducted with donors and recipients of family financial assistance with home ownership in Australia who had personal and recent family experiences of migration, this article begins to address this topic. The findings show that participants from migrant backgrounds often evoke culture and ethnicity while discussing family cultures of transmission and cultural preferences for owner occupied housing, and that they use culture as a means of deflecting potentially uncomfortable questions about fairness and equity. The findings also suggest that family financial assistance can be considered to facilitate a final stage of migrant settling which may take place years after the migrant arrives in Australia. Finally, the findings show that transnational families remain highly interconnected both emotionally and financially, and may provide financial assistance with home ownership as part of family wealth strategies through which transnational families pool resources for collective advantage. Drawing on these findings, the article shows that migration plays a crucial, and underappreciated, role in the provision and receipt of family financial assistance with home ownership. It ultimately argues that popular conversations and academic studies in the multicultural societies in which debates about the asset economy are most active (the US, the UK, Australia) have been dominated by Anglo-centric experiences, and have not considered how these arrangements may extend beyond national borders, and invites scholars in this area to more fully consider the role of migration in research on families and wealth.</p>","PeriodicalId":51368,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Sociology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145276805","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Staying Apart for the Kids? Older American Daters and the Preservation of Family Wealth. 为了孩子分开?美国老年人的约会与家庭财富的保存。
IF 3.3 2区 社会学 Q1 SOCIOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-10-08 DOI: 10.1111/1468-4446.70036
Cassandra Cotton, Raphaël Charron-Chénier

Romantic repartnering in later life has received substantial scholarly and public attention in light of population aging and changes in family dynamics. In the United States, the importance of household wealth as a means to support basic welfare needs means that questions of dating and repartnering are complicated by financial considerations. This is particularly true with regard to preserving family wealth for children and grandchildren. Drawing on in-depth interviews and focus groups with 68 adults aged 55 to 92 in Phoenix, Arizona, we explore older adults' concerns about wealth in their decisions to date and repartner. Respondents describe desires to protect wealth for future generations and to evade financial tensions in intergenerational relationships. In this context, many respondents see new romantic partnerships as a potential threat to their control over family wealth. Faced with these concerns, older adults adopt relationship strategies designed to maintain some informality in their relationships-living apart together and no government marriage-which they believe will help them avoid the financial repercussions of repartnering. These findings highlight how older adults balance family concerns and plans about financial transfers with desires to date and repartner in later life. While previous research highlights the ways that marriage shapes wealth accumulation over the life-course, these findings suggest the opposite may also be true. For older adults seeking to repartner, a lifetime of accumulated assets-and the desire to transmit these to kin-may shape the types of romantic relationships they pursue, and in particular, may lead to avoiding formalizing new relationships through marriage.

鉴于人口老龄化和家庭动态的变化,晚年的浪漫伴侣关系已经得到了大量的学术和公众的关注。在美国,家庭财富是支持基本福利需求的重要手段,这意味着约会和重新合作的问题因经济方面的考虑而变得复杂。在为子孙后代保存家族财富方面尤其如此。我们对亚利桑那州凤凰城的68名年龄在55岁至92岁之间的成年人进行了深度访谈和焦点小组调查,探讨了老年人在决定约会和再婚时对财富的担忧。受访者表示,他们希望为后代保护财富,并避免代际关系中的财务紧张。在这种背景下,许多受访者认为新的恋爱关系可能会威胁到他们对家庭财富的控制。面对这些担忧,老年人采取了一些关系策略,旨在保持一些非正式的关系——分居在一起,没有政府的婚姻——他们认为这将帮助他们避免重新合作带来的经济影响。这些发现强调了老年人如何在家庭问题和财务转移计划与晚年约会和重新合作的愿望之间取得平衡。虽然之前的研究强调了婚姻在一生中影响财富积累的方式,但这些发现表明,相反的情况也可能是正确的。对于寻求重新伴侣的老年人来说,一生积累的资产——以及将这些资产传递给亲属的愿望——可能会塑造他们所追求的浪漫关系的类型,尤其是,可能会导致他们避免通过婚姻建立正式的新关系。
{"title":"Staying Apart for the Kids? Older American Daters and the Preservation of Family Wealth.","authors":"Cassandra Cotton, Raphaël Charron-Chénier","doi":"10.1111/1468-4446.70036","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.70036","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Romantic repartnering in later life has received substantial scholarly and public attention in light of population aging and changes in family dynamics. In the United States, the importance of household wealth as a means to support basic welfare needs means that questions of dating and repartnering are complicated by financial considerations. This is particularly true with regard to preserving family wealth for children and grandchildren. Drawing on in-depth interviews and focus groups with 68 adults aged 55 to 92 in Phoenix, Arizona, we explore older adults' concerns about wealth in their decisions to date and repartner. Respondents describe desires to protect wealth for future generations and to evade financial tensions in intergenerational relationships. In this context, many respondents see new romantic partnerships as a potential threat to their control over family wealth. Faced with these concerns, older adults adopt relationship strategies designed to maintain some informality in their relationships-living apart together and no government marriage-which they believe will help them avoid the financial repercussions of repartnering. These findings highlight how older adults balance family concerns and plans about financial transfers with desires to date and repartner in later life. While previous research highlights the ways that marriage shapes wealth accumulation over the life-course, these findings suggest the opposite may also be true. For older adults seeking to repartner, a lifetime of accumulated assets-and the desire to transmit these to kin-may shape the types of romantic relationships they pursue, and in particular, may lead to avoiding formalizing new relationships through marriage.</p>","PeriodicalId":51368,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Sociology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145253678","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Gender, Families, and Wealth Accumulation Among the One-Child Generation. 独生子女一代的性别、家庭和财富积累。
IF 3.3 2区 社会学 Q1 SOCIOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-10-07 DOI: 10.1111/1468-4446.70038
Ye Liu

Prior literature on gender and wealth accumulation largely examines the role of families in reproducing inequalities. However, less attention has been paid to families without sons, a significant demographic, particularly within China's one-child generation, that challenges conventional understandings of familial wealth dynamics. This study addresses this gap by proposing a new conceptual framework: families as sequential and interconnected sites and agents of wealth accumulation across the life course. It specifically applies this framework to investigate the experiences of siblingless daughters from China's one-child generation. Drawing upon 82 individual interviews, this research argues that families are dynamic and sequentially unfolding sites of wealth transfers, acting as both enablers and limiters of women's wealth accumulation. This perspective reveals how family structures, resources, and roles transform and interact at various life-course stages. The findings demonstrate that siblingless daughters are significant recipients of wealth transfers-including cash, valuables, and property-from multiple givers across key life-course stages such as university education, career entry, and marriage and childbirth. While wealth transfers within natal families are often relatively uncontested, access to marital wealth remains highly contingent on women's adherence to patriarchal expectations, particularly childbearing and the production of male heirs. By highlighting a life-course lens and the evolving, relational nature of family-based wealth transfers, this study exposes consistent yet competing relationships and power dynamics. It reveals instances of merit-based opportunity within these dynamics, alongside the reinforcement of enduring patriarchal constraints. This new conceptualisation not only allows for a deeper examination of persistent patriarchal constraints as they evolve and accumulate across life-course points, but also exposes niche spaces where some women negotiate and potentially subvert these constraints to accumulate wealth. Therefore, this study advances research on gender and wealth by illuminating the complex interplay of familial relationships, resources, and roles across the sequential life course.

先前关于性别和财富积累的文献主要考察了家庭在再现不平等中的作用。然而,人们对没有儿子的家庭关注较少,这是一个重要的人口结构,特别是在中国的独生子女一代中,这挑战了对家庭财富动态的传统理解。本研究通过提出一个新的概念框架来解决这一差距:家庭是整个生命过程中连续和相互关联的场所和财富积累的代理人。它特别应用这一框架来调查中国独生子女一代中没有兄弟姐妹的女儿的经历。通过对82个个体的访谈,本研究认为,家庭是动态的、按顺序展开的财富转移场所,既是女性财富积累的推动者,也是限制者。这一观点揭示了家庭结构、资源和角色在不同人生阶段是如何转变和相互作用的。研究结果表明,没有兄弟姐妹的女儿是财富转移的重要接受者,包括现金、贵重物品和财产,这些财富转移来自多个捐赠者,跨越了人生的关键阶段,如大学教育、进入职场、结婚和生育。虽然出生家庭内部的财富转移往往相对没有争议,但获得婚姻财富的机会仍然高度取决于妇女对父权期望的遵守,特别是生育和生育男性继承人。通过强调生命历程的视角和基于家庭的财富转移的不断发展的关系本质,本研究揭示了一致但又相互竞争的关系和权力动态。它揭示了这些动态中择优机会的实例,同时也强化了持久的父权约束。这种新的概念不仅允许对持续的父权约束进行更深入的研究,因为它们在生命历程的各个阶段不断演变和积累,而且还暴露了一些女性谈判和潜在地颠覆这些约束以积累财富的利基空间。因此,本研究通过阐明家庭关系、资源和角色在连续生命历程中的复杂相互作用,推进了性别与财富的研究。
{"title":"Gender, Families, and Wealth Accumulation Among the One-Child Generation.","authors":"Ye Liu","doi":"10.1111/1468-4446.70038","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.70038","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Prior literature on gender and wealth accumulation largely examines the role of families in reproducing inequalities. However, less attention has been paid to families without sons, a significant demographic, particularly within China's one-child generation, that challenges conventional understandings of familial wealth dynamics. This study addresses this gap by proposing a new conceptual framework: families as sequential and interconnected sites and agents of wealth accumulation across the life course. It specifically applies this framework to investigate the experiences of siblingless daughters from China's one-child generation. Drawing upon 82 individual interviews, this research argues that families are dynamic and sequentially unfolding sites of wealth transfers, acting as both enablers and limiters of women's wealth accumulation. This perspective reveals how family structures, resources, and roles transform and interact at various life-course stages. The findings demonstrate that siblingless daughters are significant recipients of wealth transfers-including cash, valuables, and property-from multiple givers across key life-course stages such as university education, career entry, and marriage and childbirth. While wealth transfers within natal families are often relatively uncontested, access to marital wealth remains highly contingent on women's adherence to patriarchal expectations, particularly childbearing and the production of male heirs. By highlighting a life-course lens and the evolving, relational nature of family-based wealth transfers, this study exposes consistent yet competing relationships and power dynamics. It reveals instances of merit-based opportunity within these dynamics, alongside the reinforcement of enduring patriarchal constraints. This new conceptualisation not only allows for a deeper examination of persistent patriarchal constraints as they evolve and accumulate across life-course points, but also exposes niche spaces where some women negotiate and potentially subvert these constraints to accumulate wealth. Therefore, this study advances research on gender and wealth by illuminating the complex interplay of familial relationships, resources, and roles across the sequential life course.</p>","PeriodicalId":51368,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Sociology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145240286","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Science-Fictional Expectations: Public Beliefs About AI and Change in the Moral Economy 科幻期望:公众对人工智能和道德经济变革的看法。
IF 3.3 2区 社会学 Q1 SOCIOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-10-02 DOI: 10.1111/1468-4446.70034
Ken Cai Kowalski

Drawing on 78 interviews and 12 focus groups, this study shows that science-fiction shapes the US public's understandings about economic consequences from AI, informing widespread concerns that sentient machines might fully replace human workers. Though popular beliefs are frequently dismissed as unimportant or merely ignorant, I find that these “science-fictional expectations” about AI's potential to out-compete humans also enable creative departures from the prevailing moral economy of normative judgments about market fairness. By imagining the possibility of AI becoming a rival group-actor in the labor market, participants subverted deeply entrenched, neoliberal cultural associations between moral deservingness and economic performance in two ways. Respondents who anticipated “labor substitution” feared that AI's superior efficiency would render humanity worthless, thereby reinterpreting the moral legitimacy of economic productivity as an existential danger. Others refuted this threat by “enchanting” humanity with enigmatic capabilities said to be unattainable by machines and more valuable than productive capacity. Whereas prior work has focused on deliberate efforts by political actors to influence popular judgments about the economy, these findings show that the public itself can creatively contribute to change in the moral economy through its unexpected, wide-ranging, and even science-fictional interpretations of social conditions like AI automation.

通过78次访谈和12个焦点小组的研究,这项研究表明,科幻小说塑造了美国公众对人工智能经济后果的理解,让人们普遍担心有感知的机器可能会完全取代人类工人。尽管流行的信念经常被认为不重要或仅仅是无知,但我发现,这些关于人工智能有可能超越人类的“科幻预期”,也使得人们创造性地偏离了主流道德经济中关于市场公平的规范性判断。通过想象人工智能在劳动力市场中成为竞争对手的可能性,参与者以两种方式颠覆了道德应得和经济表现之间根深蒂固的新自由主义文化联系。预测“劳动力替代”的受访者担心,人工智能的卓越效率将使人类变得毫无价值,从而将经济生产力的道德合法性重新解释为一种存在的危险。另一些人则驳斥了这种威胁,他们用机器无法获得的神秘能力“迷惑”人类,这种能力比生产能力更有价值。尽管之前的研究主要集中在政治行为者有意影响公众对经济的判断,但这些发现表明,公众本身可以通过对人工智能自动化等社会状况的意想不到的、广泛的、甚至是科幻的解释,创造性地为道德经济的变化做出贡献。
{"title":"Science-Fictional Expectations: Public Beliefs About AI and Change in the Moral Economy","authors":"Ken Cai Kowalski","doi":"10.1111/1468-4446.70034","DOIUrl":"10.1111/1468-4446.70034","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Drawing on 78 interviews and 12 focus groups, this study shows that science-fiction shapes the US public's understandings about economic consequences from AI, informing widespread concerns that sentient machines might fully replace human workers. Though popular beliefs are frequently dismissed as unimportant or merely ignorant, I find that these “science-fictional expectations” about AI's potential to out-compete humans also enable creative departures from the prevailing moral economy of normative judgments about market fairness. By imagining the possibility of AI becoming a rival group-actor in the labor market, participants subverted deeply entrenched, neoliberal cultural associations between moral deservingness and economic performance in two ways. Respondents who anticipated “labor substitution” feared that AI's superior efficiency would render humanity worthless, thereby reinterpreting the moral legitimacy of economic productivity as an existential danger. Others refuted this threat by “enchanting” humanity with enigmatic capabilities said to be unattainable by machines and more valuable than productive capacity. Whereas prior work has focused on deliberate efforts by political actors to influence popular judgments about the economy, these findings show that the public itself can creatively contribute to change in the moral economy through its unexpected, wide-ranging, and even science-fictional interpretations of social conditions like AI automation.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":51368,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Sociology","volume":"77 1","pages":"74-89"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145214426","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Student Socioeconomic Status and Teacher-Student Perceptual Discrepancies of School Effort and Enjoyment 学生社会经济地位与学习努力与享受的师生知觉差异。
IF 3.3 2区 社会学 Q1 SOCIOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-10-01 DOI: 10.1111/1468-4446.70035
Valentina Perinetti Casoni, Katherin Barg

Congruence between teacher and student perceptions of student academic attitudes reflects positive teacher-student relationships and enables teachers to adjust to students' needs. This study investigates discrepancies between teacher and student perceptions of student's school enjoyment and effort, and whether these discrepancies are associated with student SES. It also tests one mechanism—student visibility—that may be driving the association with student SES. We draw on representative survey data on children at the end of primary school in England and Scotland and use a residual method to compute perceptual discrepancies. We find that teachers significantly rate the effort and enjoyment of low SES students more negatively and the same attitudes for high SES students more positively compared to what the students' own reports would suggest. The association between SES and teacher-student perceptual discrepancies remains significant even when SES-differences in student visibility, captured through student prior ability and behaviour, are considered.

师生对学生学术态度认知的一致性反映了积极的师生关系,并使教师能够适应学生的需求。本研究探讨教师与学生对学生在学校的享受和努力的认知差异,以及这些差异是否与学生的社会经济地位有关。它还测试了一种机制——学生的可见性——这可能推动了与学生SES的联系。我们利用英格兰和苏格兰小学毕业儿童的代表性调查数据,并使用残差法计算感知差异。我们发现,与学生自己的报告所显示的相比,教师对低经济地位学生的努力和享受的评价更为消极,而对高经济地位学生的同样态度则更为积极。即使考虑到通过学生先前的能力和行为捕捉到的学生可视性的SES差异,SES与师生感知差异之间的关联仍然显著。
{"title":"Student Socioeconomic Status and Teacher-Student Perceptual Discrepancies of School Effort and Enjoyment","authors":"Valentina Perinetti Casoni,&nbsp;Katherin Barg","doi":"10.1111/1468-4446.70035","DOIUrl":"10.1111/1468-4446.70035","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Congruence between teacher and student perceptions of student academic attitudes reflects positive teacher-student relationships and enables teachers to adjust to students' needs. This study investigates discrepancies between teacher and student perceptions of student's school enjoyment and effort, and whether these discrepancies are associated with student SES. It also tests one mechanism—student visibility—that may be driving the association with student SES. We draw on representative survey data on children at the end of primary school in England and Scotland and use a residual method to compute perceptual discrepancies. We find that teachers significantly rate the effort and enjoyment of low SES students more negatively and the same attitudes for high SES students more positively compared to what the students' own reports would suggest. The association between SES and teacher-student perceptual discrepancies remains significant even when SES-differences in student visibility, captured through student prior ability and behaviour, are considered.</p>","PeriodicalId":51368,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Sociology","volume":"77 1","pages":"52-73"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12793720/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145208357","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
‘Stranger Views’: Researching Marginality and (Non)Belonging Among Migrants Experiencing Homelessness in the UK “陌生人的观点”:研究英国无家可归移民的边缘性和(非)归属感。
IF 3.3 2区 社会学 Q1 SOCIOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-09-28 DOI: 10.1111/1468-4446.70033
Simon Stewart, Marianela Barrios Aquino

With reference to Simmel's work, this article puts forward the notion of ‘stranger views’, which are expressive on the one hand, of the experiences of those who occupy a marginal position in society characterised by experiences of belonging and non-belonging, and on the other, of our own position as researchers, probing spaces of non-belonging and hearing stories that are then rearticulated for an academic audience. In doing so, it provides a reflective dialog between the findings of a research project on migrant homelessness in the UK and the methodological framework brought by New Area Studies. The article deploys the life story research method and focuses on views of the UK from the perspective of migrants from former European colonies who have been in the UK for several years but whose immigration status and lack of economic capital renders them vulnerable to destitution and homelessness. The article offers unique insights into the co-existence of belonging and non-belonging and the dissonance between these feelings. In providing a dialog between accounts deriving from life story interviews with migrants experiencing homelessness and a self-critical reflection about the knowledge produced with such accounts, our article contributes to debates on the sociology of marginality with a three-tiered discussion of migration, homelessness and methodological frameworks, which are rarely considered together.

参考齐美尔的作品,本文提出了“陌生人观点”的概念,一方面表达了那些在社会中处于边缘地位的人的经历,这些经历以归属和非归属的经历为特征,另一方面,表达了我们作为研究人员的立场,探索非归属的空间,倾听故事,然后为学术观众重新阐述。在此过程中,它提供了一个关于英国移民无家可归的研究项目的结果与新区研究带来的方法框架之间的反思性对话。本文采用生活故事研究方法,从前欧洲殖民地移民的角度关注英国的观点,这些移民已经在英国生活了几年,但他们的移民身份和缺乏经济资本使他们容易陷入贫困和无家可归。这篇文章对归属感和非归属感的共存以及这些感觉之间的不和谐提供了独特的见解。通过对经历无家可归的移民的生活故事访谈,以及对这些账户所产生的知识的自我批判反思,我们的文章通过对移民、无家可归和方法框架的三层讨论,为边缘化社会学的辩论做出了贡献,而这三层讨论很少被放在一起考虑。
{"title":"‘Stranger Views’: Researching Marginality and (Non)Belonging Among Migrants Experiencing Homelessness in the UK","authors":"Simon Stewart,&nbsp;Marianela Barrios Aquino","doi":"10.1111/1468-4446.70033","DOIUrl":"10.1111/1468-4446.70033","url":null,"abstract":"<p>With reference to Simmel's work, this article puts forward the notion of ‘stranger views’, which are expressive on the one hand, of the experiences of those who occupy a marginal position in society characterised by experiences of belonging and non-belonging, and on the other, of our own position as researchers, probing spaces of non-belonging and hearing stories that are then rearticulated for an academic audience. In doing so, it provides a reflective dialog between the findings of a research project on migrant homelessness in the UK and the methodological framework brought by New Area Studies. The article deploys the life story research method and focuses on views of the UK from the perspective of migrants from former European colonies who have been in the UK for several years but whose immigration status and lack of economic capital renders them vulnerable to destitution and homelessness. The article offers unique insights into the co-existence of belonging and non-belonging and the dissonance between these feelings. In providing a dialog between accounts deriving from life story interviews with migrants experiencing homelessness and a self-critical reflection about the knowledge produced with such accounts, our article contributes to debates on the sociology of marginality with a three-tiered discussion of migration, homelessness and methodological frameworks, which are rarely considered together.</p>","PeriodicalId":51368,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Sociology","volume":"77 1","pages":"42-51"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1468-4446.70033","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145187305","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Why Neoliberalism Doesn't Spell the Death of Society: Commonality, Regulation, and the Politics of Social Cohesion 为什么新自由主义并不意味着社会的死亡:共性、规则和社会凝聚力的政治。
IF 3.3 2区 社会学 Q1 SOCIOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-09-23 DOI: 10.1111/1468-4446.70031
Jan Dobbernack

Perspectives on neoliberal political-economic practice often frame its dominance in terms of harms to ‘society’. Prominently, Wendy Brown (2019, 52) offers an account of the ‘neoliberal revolution’, claiming that, when ‘the social vanishes from our ideas, speech, and experience’, commonality disappears, democracy diminishes, and authoritarianism prevails. The paper considers this understanding to argue for the importance of political articulations of ‘society’, which reveal complexities that elude nostalgic accounts of how the social has been lost. Making this case, it works through real-world invocations of social commonality in the name of social cohesion. Social cohesion illustrates the multiplicity of objectives invoking ‘society’, ranging from the production of pro-social subjects to the pursuit of resilience against shifting scenarios of social collapse. On this basis the paper problematises perspectives that either treat the social as an artefact of administrative practice or that prioritize experiences of moral purpose and commonality. It argues that such positions risk mythologizing ‘society’ if they don't attend to the complex circumstances of its political articulation.

对新自由主义政治经济实践的看法,常常以其对“社会”的危害来框定其主导地位。突出的是,温迪·布朗(2019,52)提供了一种“新自由主义革命”的解释,声称当“社会从我们的思想、言论和经验中消失”时,共性就会消失,民主就会减弱,威权主义就会盛行。本文认为这种理解是为了论证“社会”的政治表达的重要性,它揭示了社会如何丢失的怀旧叙述的复杂性。在这种情况下,它以社会凝聚力的名义,通过现实世界对社会共性的召唤而起作用。社会凝聚力说明了调用“社会”的目标的多样性,从生产亲社会主体到追求抵御社会崩溃变化情景的弹性。在此基础上,本文对将社会视为行政实践的人工制品或优先考虑道德目的和共性经验的观点提出了质疑。它认为,如果这些立场不关注其政治表达的复杂环境,就有可能使“社会”神话化。
{"title":"Why Neoliberalism Doesn't Spell the Death of Society: Commonality, Regulation, and the Politics of Social Cohesion","authors":"Jan Dobbernack","doi":"10.1111/1468-4446.70031","DOIUrl":"10.1111/1468-4446.70031","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Perspectives on neoliberal political-economic practice often frame its dominance in terms of harms to ‘society’. Prominently, Wendy Brown (2019, 52) offers an account of the ‘neoliberal revolution’, claiming that, when ‘the social vanishes from our ideas, speech, and experience’, commonality disappears, democracy diminishes, and authoritarianism prevails. The paper considers this understanding to argue for the importance of political articulations of ‘society’, which reveal complexities that elude nostalgic accounts of how the social has been lost. Making this case, it works through real-world invocations of social commonality in the name of social cohesion. Social cohesion illustrates the multiplicity of objectives invoking ‘society’, ranging from the production of pro-social subjects to the pursuit of resilience against shifting scenarios of social collapse. On this basis the paper problematises perspectives that either treat the social as an artefact of administrative practice or that prioritize experiences of moral purpose and commonality. It argues that such positions risk mythologizing ‘society’ if they don't attend to the complex circumstances of its political articulation.</p>","PeriodicalId":51368,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Sociology","volume":"77 1","pages":"19-29"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1468-4446.70031","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145132444","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Why Do High-Income Democrats Support Redistribution? The Roles of Partisanship, Racial Attitudes and Fiscal Populism 为什么高收入民主党人支持再分配?党派关系、种族态度和财政民粹主义的作用。
IF 3.3 2区 社会学 Q1 SOCIOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-09-23 DOI: 10.1111/1468-4446.70032
Karyn Vilbig

Since the 1990s, high-income individuals have increasingly sorted into the Democratic Party as a result of their socially liberal views. There is evidence that over time high-income Democrats have also liberalized in their economic attitudes, but the motivations behind this purported support remain unclear. This study uses a forced-choice conjoint experiment with an oversample of high-income respondents and takes the novel approach of pairing the experiment with cognitive interviews in order to explore why high-income Democrats support redistributive policies. Results show that the redistributive preferences of high-income Democrats look very similar to those of other Democrats. They prefer policies proposed by their own party. They want policies that are racially “fair,” and sometimes define this to mean favoring Black recipients. Most of all, however, they are driven by a commitment to “fiscal populism,” the idea that (increased) government spending should be funded by the most elite members of society.

自20世纪90年代以来,高收入人群因其社会自由主义观点而越来越多地归入民主党。有证据表明,随着时间的推移,高收入的民主党人在经济态度上也自由化了,但这种所谓的支持背后的动机尚不清楚。本研究对高收入受访者进行了强制选择联合实验,并采用了将实验与认知访谈相结合的新颖方法,以探索高收入民主党人支持再分配政策的原因。结果显示,高收入民主党人的再分配偏好与其他民主党人非常相似。他们更喜欢本党提出的政策。他们希望政策在种族上“公平”,有时将其定义为偏袒黑人受助人。然而,最重要的是,它们是由对“财政民粹主义”的承诺所驱动的,这种观点认为(增加的)政府支出应该由社会中最精英的成员提供资金。
{"title":"Why Do High-Income Democrats Support Redistribution? The Roles of Partisanship, Racial Attitudes and Fiscal Populism","authors":"Karyn Vilbig","doi":"10.1111/1468-4446.70032","DOIUrl":"10.1111/1468-4446.70032","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Since the 1990s, high-income individuals have increasingly sorted into the Democratic Party as a result of their socially liberal views. There is evidence that over time high-income Democrats have also liberalized in their economic attitudes, but the motivations behind this purported support remain unclear. This study uses a forced-choice conjoint experiment with an oversample of high-income respondents and takes the novel approach of pairing the experiment with cognitive interviews in order to explore why high-income Democrats support redistributive policies. Results show that the redistributive preferences of high-income Democrats look very similar to those of other Democrats. They prefer policies proposed by their own party. They want policies that are racially “fair,” and sometimes define this to mean favoring Black recipients. Most of all, however, they are driven by a commitment to “fiscal populism,” the idea that (increased) government spending should be funded by the most elite members of society.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":51368,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Sociology","volume":"77 1","pages":"30-41"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145132370","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comparing Transgender Identities in the Census of Scotland and the Census of England and Wales 比较苏格兰人口普查与英格兰和威尔士人口普查中的跨性别身份。
IF 3.3 2区 社会学 Q1 SOCIOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-09-19 DOI: 10.1111/1468-4446.70030
Michael Biggs

The most recent British census was the first to elicit transgender identity. The 2021 Census of England and Wales asked ‘Is the gender you identify with the same as your sex registered at birth?’. It is has been argued that this formulation confused a substantial number of respondents who erroneously answered in the negative. The 2022 Census of Scotland asked a clearer question, ‘Do you consider yourself to be trans, or have a trans history?’ Comparison between the results provides further evidence that the Census of England and Wales overestimated the transgender population, and also raises the possibility that it undercounted the non-binary component of this population.

最近的英国人口普查首次引出了跨性别身份。2021年英格兰和威尔士人口普查的问题是“你认同的性别与你出生时登记的性别相同吗?”有人认为,这种表述混淆了相当数量的受访者,他们错误地回答了否定。2022年苏格兰人口普查问了一个更明确的问题:“你认为自己是变性人吗?或者你有变性史吗?”结果之间的比较提供了进一步的证据,证明英格兰和威尔士人口普查高估了跨性别人口,也提出了低估该人口中非二元组成部分的可能性。
{"title":"Comparing Transgender Identities in the Census of Scotland and the Census of England and Wales","authors":"Michael Biggs","doi":"10.1111/1468-4446.70030","DOIUrl":"10.1111/1468-4446.70030","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The most recent British census was the first to elicit transgender identity. The 2021 Census of England and Wales asked ‘Is the gender you identify with the same as your sex registered at birth?’. It is has been argued that this formulation confused a substantial number of respondents who erroneously answered in the negative. The 2022 Census of Scotland asked a clearer question, ‘Do you consider yourself to be trans, or have a trans history?’ Comparison between the results provides further evidence that the Census of England and Wales overestimated the transgender population, and also raises the possibility that it undercounted the non-binary component of this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":51368,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Sociology","volume":"77 1","pages":"163-169"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1468-4446.70030","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145092925","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Does Education Legitimise Inequality? Comparative Analysis of Income Inequality, Education, and Meritocratic Beliefs 教育使不平等合法化了吗?收入不平等、教育和精英主义信仰的比较分析。
IF 3.3 2区 社会学 Q1 SOCIOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-09-13 DOI: 10.1111/1468-4446.70029
Cheng Liu, Jingjing Wang

The paradox of inequality posits that individuals in high-inequality societies paradoxically exhibit stronger meritocratic beliefs, perceiving their societies as systems that reward individuals based on ability and effort rather than social background or connections. This study presents an explanation from the perspective of critical sociology of education, complementing prior research that offers community contextual and psychosocial insights. By analysing the ISSP 2019 dataset, which includes 29 countries or regions, we find that in countries or regions with high income inequality, education serves to legitimise inequality and diminishes individuals' awareness of the structural factors contributing to inequality. Conversely, in those with low inequality, while basic education also functions to legitimise inequality, advanced stages of education possess an enlightening character that enables individuals to be more aware of the structural factors that lead to inequality. Generally, by estimating the interactions between education and country-level income inequality, this study elucidates the factors contributing to the paradox of inequality and reconciles the persistent argument between legitimisation and enlightenment theories of education.

不平等悖论认为,高度不平等社会中的个人自相矛盾地表现出更强的精英主义信仰,认为他们的社会体系是基于能力和努力而不是社会背景或关系来奖励个人的。本研究从批判教育社会学的角度提出解释,补充了先前提供社区情境和社会心理洞见的研究。通过分析包括29个国家或地区的ISSP 2019数据集,我们发现,在收入不平等严重的国家或地区,教育使不平等合法化,并降低了个人对导致不平等的结构性因素的认识。相反,在那些不平等程度较低的国家,虽然基础教育也起到了使不平等合法化的作用,但教育的高级阶段具有启发性,使个人能够更加意识到导致不平等的结构性因素。总的来说,通过估算教育与国家层面收入不平等之间的相互作用,本研究阐明了导致不平等悖论的因素,并调和了教育合法化理论与启蒙理论之间的持久争论。
{"title":"Does Education Legitimise Inequality? Comparative Analysis of Income Inequality, Education, and Meritocratic Beliefs","authors":"Cheng Liu,&nbsp;Jingjing Wang","doi":"10.1111/1468-4446.70029","DOIUrl":"10.1111/1468-4446.70029","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The paradox of inequality posits that individuals in high-inequality societies paradoxically exhibit stronger meritocratic beliefs, perceiving their societies as systems that reward individuals based on ability and effort rather than social background or connections. This study presents an explanation from the perspective of critical sociology of education, complementing prior research that offers community contextual and psychosocial insights. By analysing the ISSP 2019 dataset, which includes 29 countries or regions, we find that in countries or regions with high income inequality, education serves to legitimise inequality and diminishes individuals' awareness of the structural factors contributing to inequality. Conversely, in those with low inequality, while basic education also functions to legitimise inequality, advanced stages of education possess an enlightening character that enables individuals to be more aware of the structural factors that lead to inequality. Generally, by estimating the interactions between education and country-level income inequality, this study elucidates the factors contributing to the paradox of inequality and reconciles the persistent argument between legitimisation and enlightenment theories of education.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":51368,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Sociology","volume":"77 1","pages":"5-18"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145058627","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
British Journal of Sociology
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1