首页 > 最新文献

Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review最新文献

英文 中文
Parental Risk and Protective Factors Associated with Bullying Victimization in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. 与儿童和青少年遭受欺凌有关的父母风险和保护因素:系统回顾与元分析》。
IF 5.5 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-08 DOI: 10.1007/s10567-024-00473-8
Diana Ioana Grama, Raluca Diana Georgescu, Iulia Maria Coşa, Anca Dobrean

The main objective of this meta-analysis was to investigate how modifiable parental factors are related to traditional and cyberbullying victimization in children and adolescents. A systematic literature search of modifiable parental factors associated with bullying victimization was conducted using PubMed, PsycINFO, Scopus, and Web of Science electronic databases. Meta-analyses were performed to assess the mean effect sizes of the associations between the broader categories of parental factors (risk and protective) and bullying victimization (traditional and cyber), as well as between specific parental factors and bullying victimization (traditional and cyber). The differential impact of maternal and paternal factors (risk and protective) was examined. Age and gender were tested as moderators. Out of the 13,171 records identified, 158 studies met the inclusion criteria. Larger evidence was found for the association between parental risk (i.e., authoritarian parenting, aversiveness, inter-parental conflict, over-involvement, permissive parenting, and withdrawal) and protective (i.e., authoritative parenting, autonomy granting, warmth, and monitoring) factors, respectively, and traditional bullying victimization, with parental warmth, aversiveness, and withdrawal being the only common related predictors for traditional and cyberbullying victimization. The effect sizes were generally small. Maternal and paternal factors showed similar patterns of association with both types of bullying victimization. Age had a moderating effect on the association between parental protective factors and cyberbullying victimization. Overall, the present findings suggest that parental factors are relevant in protecting or putting children at risk for bullying victimization, especially in the offline context.

本荟萃分析的主要目的是研究可改变的父母因素与儿童和青少年遭受传统欺凌和网络欺凌的关系。我们使用PubMed、PsycINFO、Scopus和Web of Science电子数据库对与欺凌受害相关的可改变的父母因素进行了系统的文献检索。研究人员进行了元分析,以评估更广泛类别的父母因素(风险和保护性因素)与欺凌受害(传统和网络)之间的平均效应大小,以及特定父母因素与欺凌受害(传统和网络)之间的平均效应大小。研究还考察了母亲和父亲因素(风险和保护)的不同影响。年龄和性别作为调节因素进行了测试。在已确定的 13,171 条记录中,有 158 项研究符合纳入标准。研究发现,父母的风险因素(即专制型养育、逆反心理、父母间冲突、过度介入、放任型养育和退缩)和保护因素(即权威型养育、给予自主权、温暖和监督)分别与传统欺凌受害情况之间的关联证据较多,而父母的温暖、逆反心理和退缩是传统欺凌和网络欺凌受害情况的唯一共同相关预测因素。效应大小普遍较小。母亲和父亲因素与这两种类型的欺凌受害情况的关联模式相似。年龄对父母保护性因素与网络欺凌受害之间的关联具有调节作用。总体而言,本研究结果表明,父母因素在保护儿童或使儿童面临欺凌受害风险方面具有相关性,尤其是在离线情况下。
{"title":"Parental Risk and Protective Factors Associated with Bullying Victimization in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.","authors":"Diana Ioana Grama, Raluca Diana Georgescu, Iulia Maria Coşa, Anca Dobrean","doi":"10.1007/s10567-024-00473-8","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10567-024-00473-8","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The main objective of this meta-analysis was to investigate how modifiable parental factors are related to traditional and cyberbullying victimization in children and adolescents. A systematic literature search of modifiable parental factors associated with bullying victimization was conducted using PubMed, PsycINFO, Scopus, and Web of Science electronic databases. Meta-analyses were performed to assess the mean effect sizes of the associations between the broader categories of parental factors (risk and protective) and bullying victimization (traditional and cyber), as well as between specific parental factors and bullying victimization (traditional and cyber). The differential impact of maternal and paternal factors (risk and protective) was examined. Age and gender were tested as moderators. Out of the 13,171 records identified, 158 studies met the inclusion criteria. Larger evidence was found for the association between parental risk (i.e., authoritarian parenting, aversiveness, inter-parental conflict, over-involvement, permissive parenting, and withdrawal) and protective (i.e., authoritative parenting, autonomy granting, warmth, and monitoring) factors, respectively, and traditional bullying victimization, with parental warmth, aversiveness, and withdrawal being the only common related predictors for traditional and cyberbullying victimization. The effect sizes were generally small. Maternal and paternal factors showed similar patterns of association with both types of bullying victimization. Age had a moderating effect on the association between parental protective factors and cyberbullying victimization. Overall, the present findings suggest that parental factors are relevant in protecting or putting children at risk for bullying victimization, especially in the offline context.</p>","PeriodicalId":51399,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review","volume":" ","pages":"627-657"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11486818/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140892582","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Brief School-Based Interventions Targeting Student Mental Health or Well-Being: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. 以学生心理健康或幸福为目标的简短校本干预:系统回顾与元分析》。
IF 5.5 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-17 DOI: 10.1007/s10567-024-00487-2
Katherine A Cohen, Sakura Ito, Isaac L Ahuvia, Yuanyuan Yang, Yanchen Zhang, Tyler L Renshaw, Madeline Larson, Clayton Cook, Shannon Hill, Jessica Liao, Andy Rapoport, Amanda Smock, Michelle Yang, Jessica L Schleider

Brief, school-based mental health interventions hold promise for reducing barriers to mental health support access, a critical endeavor in light of increasing rates of mental health concerns among youth. However, there is no consensus on whether or not brief school-based interventions are effective at reducing mental health concerns or improving well-being. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to provide consensus and determine directions for future work. Articles were included if they examined a brief (≤ four sessions or 240 min of intervention time) psychosocial intervention, were conducted within a Pre-K through 12th-grade school setting, included at least one treatment outcome evaluating mental health or well-being, and were published since 2000. A total of 6,702 papers were identified through database searching, of which 81 papers (k studies = 75) were ultimately selected for inclusion. A total of 40,498 students were included across studies and a total of 75 unique interventions were examined. A total of 324 effect sizes were extracted. On average, interventions led to statistically significant improvements in mental health/well-being outcomes versus control conditions up to one-month (g = .18, p = .004), six-month (g = .15, p = .006), and one-year (g = .10, p = .03) post-intervention. There may be benefits to brief school-based interventions from a preventative public health standpoint; future research may focus on how to optimize their real-world utility. Prospero pre-registration: CRD42021255079.

简短的校本心理健康干预措施有望减少获得心理健康支持的障碍,鉴于青少年心理健康问题的发生率越来越高,这是一项至关重要的工作。然而,对于简短的校本干预是否能有效减少心理健康问题或改善幸福感,目前还没有达成共识。本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在达成共识并确定未来工作的方向。纳入的文章必须是研究了简短(少于四节课或 240 分钟干预时间)的社会心理干预,在学前班到十二年级的学校环境中进行,至少包含一项评估心理健康或幸福感的治疗结果,并且是自 2000 年以来发表的。通过数据库搜索,共发现了 6702 篇论文,最终选择了其中的 81 篇(k 项研究 = 75)纳入研究。各项研究共纳入了 40,498 名学生,共研究了 75 项独特的干预措施。共提取了 324 个效应大小。平均而言,干预后一个月(g = .18,p = .004)、六个月(g = .15,p = .006)和一年(g = .10,p = .03)的心理健康/幸福感结果与对照组相比均有统计学意义上的显著改善。从预防性公共卫生的角度来看,简短的校本干预可能会带来一些益处;未来的研究可能会侧重于如何优化其实际效用。Prospero 预注册:CRD42021255079。
{"title":"Brief School-Based Interventions Targeting Student Mental Health or Well-Being: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Katherine A Cohen, Sakura Ito, Isaac L Ahuvia, Yuanyuan Yang, Yanchen Zhang, Tyler L Renshaw, Madeline Larson, Clayton Cook, Shannon Hill, Jessica Liao, Andy Rapoport, Amanda Smock, Michelle Yang, Jessica L Schleider","doi":"10.1007/s10567-024-00487-2","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10567-024-00487-2","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Brief, school-based mental health interventions hold promise for reducing barriers to mental health support access, a critical endeavor in light of increasing rates of mental health concerns among youth. However, there is no consensus on whether or not brief school-based interventions are effective at reducing mental health concerns or improving well-being. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to provide consensus and determine directions for future work. Articles were included if they examined a brief (≤ four sessions or 240 min of intervention time) psychosocial intervention, were conducted within a Pre-K through 12th-grade school setting, included at least one treatment outcome evaluating mental health or well-being, and were published since 2000. A total of 6,702 papers were identified through database searching, of which 81 papers (k studies = 75) were ultimately selected for inclusion. A total of 40,498 students were included across studies and a total of 75 unique interventions were examined. A total of 324 effect sizes were extracted. On average, interventions led to statistically significant improvements in mental health/well-being outcomes versus control conditions up to one-month (g = .18, p = .004), six-month (g = .15, p = .006), and one-year (g = .10, p = .03) post-intervention. There may be benefits to brief school-based interventions from a preventative public health standpoint; future research may focus on how to optimize their real-world utility. Prospero pre-registration: CRD42021255079.</p>","PeriodicalId":51399,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review","volume":" ","pages":"732-806"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141332515","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Involving Parents in Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Children and Adolescents with Conduct Problems: Goals, Outcome Expectations, and Normative Beliefs About Aggression are Targeted in Sessions with Parents and Their Child 让家长参与针对有行为问题的儿童和青少年的认知行为疗法:在与父母及其子女的会谈中,针对目标、结果期望和关于攻击行为的规范性信念进行治疗
IF 6.9 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2024-06-08 DOI: 10.1007/s10567-024-00486-3
Walter Matthys, Dennis J. L. G. Schutter

Children and adolescents with conduct problems participate in Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT), either in individual or group format, in view of learning social problem-solving skills that enable them to behave in more independent and situation-appropriate ways. Parents must support their child’s learning processes in everyday life and therefore these processes need attention in CBT sessions in which parents and their child participate. The social problem-solving model of CBT previously described (Matthys & Schutter, Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev 25:552–572, 2022; Matthys & Schutter, Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev 26:401–415, 2023) consists of nine psychological skills. In this narrative review we propose that instead of addressing each skill separately in sessions with both parents and their child, therapists work on three schemas (latent mental structures): (1) goals, (2) outcome expectations, and (3) normative beliefs about aggression. Based on social-cognitive and cognitive neuroscience studies we argue that these three schemas affect five core social problem-solving skills: (1) interpretation, (2) clarification of goals, (3) generations of solutions, (4) evaluation of solutions, and (5) decision-making. In view of tailoring CBT to the individual child’s characteristic schemas and associated social problem-solving skills, we suggest that children and adolescents participate in individual sessions with their parents. The therapist uses Socratic questioning in order to find out characteristic schemas of the child, encourage reflection on these schemas, and explore alternative schemas that had previously been outside the child’s attention. The therapist functions as a model for parents to ask their child questions about the relevant schemas with a view of achieving changes in the schemas.

有行为问题的儿童和青少年参加认知行为疗法(CBT),可以是个人或小组形式,目的是学习解决社会问题的技能,使他们能够以更独立和更适合情况的方式行事。家长必须支持孩子在日常生活中的学习过程,因此,在家长和孩子共同参与的 CBT 课程中,需要关注这些过程。之前介绍过的 CBT 社会问题解决模式(Matthys & Schutter,《临床儿童家庭心理学评论》25:552-572,2022 年;Matthys & Schutter,《临床儿童家庭心理学评论》26:401-415,2023 年)包括九种心理技能。在这篇叙述性综述中,我们建议治疗师在与父母及其子女进行治疗时,不要分别处理每种技能,而是从三个图式(潜在的心理结构)入手:(1) 目标;(2) 结果预期;(3) 关于攻击行为的规范性信念。根据社会认知和认知神经科学研究,我们认为这三种模式会影响五种核心的社会问题解决技能:(1) 解释;(2) 明确目标;(3) 产生解决方案;(4) 评估解决方案;(5) 决策。鉴于 CBT 适合儿童的个人特征模式和相关的社会问题解决技能,我们建议儿童和青少年与其父母一起参加个别治疗。治疗师采用苏格拉底式的提问方式,以找出孩子的特征图式,鼓励孩子对这些图式进行反思,并探索以前不被孩子关注的其他图式。治疗师发挥示范作用,让家长就相关图式向孩子提问,以期改变孩子的图式。
{"title":"Involving Parents in Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Children and Adolescents with Conduct Problems: Goals, Outcome Expectations, and Normative Beliefs About Aggression are Targeted in Sessions with Parents and Their Child","authors":"Walter Matthys, Dennis J. L. G. Schutter","doi":"10.1007/s10567-024-00486-3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10567-024-00486-3","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Children and adolescents with conduct problems participate in Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT), either in individual or group format, in view of learning social problem-solving skills that enable them to behave in more independent and situation-appropriate ways. Parents must support their child’s learning processes in everyday life and therefore these processes need attention in CBT sessions in which parents and their child participate. The social problem-solving model of CBT previously described (Matthys &amp; Schutter, Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev 25:552–572, 2022; Matthys &amp; Schutter, Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev 26:401–415, 2023) consists of nine psychological skills. In this narrative review we propose that instead of addressing each skill separately in sessions with both parents and their child, therapists work on three schemas (latent mental structures): (1) goals, (2) outcome expectations, and (3) normative beliefs about aggression. Based on social-cognitive and cognitive neuroscience studies we argue that these three schemas affect five core social problem-solving skills: (1) interpretation, (2) clarification of goals, (3) generations of solutions, (4) evaluation of solutions, and (5) decision-making. In view of tailoring CBT to the individual child’s characteristic schemas and associated social problem-solving skills, we suggest that children and adolescents participate in individual sessions with their parents. The therapist uses Socratic questioning in order to find out characteristic schemas of the child, encourage reflection on these schemas, and explore alternative schemas that had previously been outside the child’s attention. The therapist functions as a model for parents to ask their child questions about the relevant schemas with a view of achieving changes in the schemas.</p>","PeriodicalId":51399,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.9,"publicationDate":"2024-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141292696","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Cognitive Functioning in Youth with Anxiety Disorders: A Systematic Review. 焦虑症青少年的认知功能:系统回顾
IF 5.5 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-03 DOI: 10.1007/s10567-024-00480-9
Jonathan C Rabner, Julia S Ney, Philip C Kendall

Anxiety disorders are disorders involving cognition. Research on cognition in youth with anxiety can focus on cognitive content (e.g., self-talk) as well cognitive functioning. The present review examines domains of cognitive functioning (i.e., episodic memory, language, attention, executive functioning, motor skills, and visual functioning) in youth diagnosed with an anxiety disorder. A database search of Embase, PsycINFO, and PubMed yielded 28 studies that met inclusion criteria of youth aged 17 years or younger, a sample diagnosed with a principal anxiety disorder and a comparison sample of controls, a comparison between those samples, and use of a behavioral measure of neuropsychological performance. Findings did not identify any cognitive functioning strengths for anxious youth. Deficits were found in two domains (i.e., receptive language and motor skills) whereas no deficits were found in attention, visuospatial skills and one domain of executive functioning (i.e., inhibition). Most domains had mixed findings. Additional analysis indicated that anxiety disorders in youth are not associated with diminished IQ. Directions for future research are identified including (a) the prioritization of studies with larger, representative samples (b) the role of cognitive functioning as a predictor of anxiety treatment outcome (c) the examination of the effect of treatment on cognitive performance, and (d) the course of anxiety and potential impairment in cognitive functioning.

焦虑症是一种涉及认知的疾病。有关焦虑症青少年认知的研究可侧重于认知内容(如自言自语)和认知功能。本综述研究了被诊断患有焦虑症的青少年的认知功能领域(即外显记忆、语言、注意力、执行功能、运动技能和视觉功能)。通过对 Embase、PsycINFO 和 PubMed 数据库的检索,我们发现有 28 项研究符合纳入标准,这些研究涉及 17 岁或以下的青少年、被诊断患有主要焦虑症的样本和对照组比较样本、这些样本之间的比较以及神经心理学表现的行为测量。研究结果没有发现焦虑症青少年在认知功能方面有任何优势。在两个领域(即接受性语言和运动技能)发现了缺陷,而在注意力、视觉空间技能和一个执行功能领域(即抑制)没有发现缺陷。大多数领域的研究结果不一。其他分析表明,青少年焦虑症与智商下降无关。研究还指出了今后的研究方向,包括:(a)优先进行具有较大代表性样本的研究;(b)认知功能作为焦虑症治疗结果预测因素的作用;(c)研究治疗对认知能力的影响;以及(d)焦虑症的病程和认知功能的潜在损害。
{"title":"Cognitive Functioning in Youth with Anxiety Disorders: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Jonathan C Rabner, Julia S Ney, Philip C Kendall","doi":"10.1007/s10567-024-00480-9","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10567-024-00480-9","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Anxiety disorders are disorders involving cognition. Research on cognition in youth with anxiety can focus on cognitive content (e.g., self-talk) as well cognitive functioning. The present review examines domains of cognitive functioning (i.e., episodic memory, language, attention, executive functioning, motor skills, and visual functioning) in youth diagnosed with an anxiety disorder. A database search of Embase, PsycINFO, and PubMed yielded 28 studies that met inclusion criteria of youth aged 17 years or younger, a sample diagnosed with a principal anxiety disorder and a comparison sample of controls, a comparison between those samples, and use of a behavioral measure of neuropsychological performance. Findings did not identify any cognitive functioning strengths for anxious youth. Deficits were found in two domains (i.e., receptive language and motor skills) whereas no deficits were found in attention, visuospatial skills and one domain of executive functioning (i.e., inhibition). Most domains had mixed findings. Additional analysis indicated that anxiety disorders in youth are not associated with diminished IQ. Directions for future research are identified including (a) the prioritization of studies with larger, representative samples (b) the role of cognitive functioning as a predictor of anxiety treatment outcome (c) the examination of the effect of treatment on cognitive performance, and (d) the course of anxiety and potential impairment in cognitive functioning.</p>","PeriodicalId":51399,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review","volume":" ","pages":"357-380"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11222226/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141200476","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Impairment and Quality of Life in Children and Adolescents with Anxiety Disorders. 对患有焦虑症的儿童和青少年的损伤和生活质量进行系统回顾和元分析。
IF 5.5 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-23 DOI: 10.1007/s10567-024-00484-5
Sophie J Dickson, Ella L Oar, Maria Kangas, Carly J Johnco, Cassie H Lavell, Ashleigh H Seaton, Lauren F McLellan, Viviana M Wuthrich, Ronald M Rapee

Anxiety disorders are common, emerge during childhood, and pose a significant burden to society and individuals. Research evaluating the impact of anxiety on functional impairment and quality of life (QoL) is increasing; however, there is yet to be a systematic review and meta-analysis of these relationships in pediatric samples. This systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to determine the extent of impairments in functioning and QoL that young people with anxiety disorders experience relative to their healthy peers, as well as sociodemographic and clinical moderators of these relationships. Studies were included when they compared young people (mean age range within studies 7-17 years) with a primary clinical anxiety disorder to a healthy comparison group and measured impairment and/or QoL via a validated instrument. A total of 12 studies met criteria for this review (N = 3,129 participants). A majority of studies (K = 9) assessed impairment as an outcome measure, and three assessed QoL outcomes. Meta-analysis of nine studies (N = 1,457 children) showed large relationships between clinical anxiety and life impairment (g = 3.23) with the strongest effects seen for clinician report (g = 5.00), followed by caregiver (g = 2.15) and child (g = 1.58) report. The small number of studies and diversity in methodology prevented quantitative investigation of moderating factors. In the systematic review of QoL outcomes, all three studies reported significantly poorer QoL for youth with anxiety disorders relative to unaffected peers. Findings support the importance of measuring functioning and QoL as outcomes in clinical research and practice among anxious young people.This study is registered with PROSPERO under the identification number CRD42023439040.

焦虑症很常见,在儿童时期就会出现,并给社会和个人带来沉重负担。评估焦虑症对功能障碍和生活质量(QoL)影响的研究越来越多;然而,目前还没有针对儿科样本中这些关系的系统回顾和荟萃分析。本系统性综述和荟萃分析旨在确定焦虑症青少年相对于健康同龄人在功能和生活质量方面的受损程度,以及这些关系的社会人口和临床调节因素。将患有原发性临床焦虑症的青少年(研究中的平均年龄范围为 7-17 岁)与健康的对比组进行比较,并通过有效的工具测量其功能损害和/或 QoL 的研究均被纳入其中。共有 12 项研究符合本综述的标准(N = 3,129 名参与者)。大多数研究(K = 9)将损伤作为结果测量指标,其中三项研究对 QoL 结果进行了评估。对 9 项研究(N = 1,457 名儿童)进行的元分析表明,临床焦虑与生活损伤之间存在很大关系(g = 3.23),其中临床医生报告的影响最大(g = 5.00),其次是护理人员报告(g = 2.15)和儿童报告(g = 1.58)。由于研究数量少、方法多样,因此无法对调节因素进行定量研究。在有关 QoL 结果的系统回顾中,所有三项研究都报告称,与未受影响的同龄人相比,患有焦虑症的青少年的 QoL 明显较差。研究结果表明,在焦虑症青少年的临床研究和实践中,测量功能和 QoL 结果非常重要。
{"title":"A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Impairment and Quality of Life in Children and Adolescents with Anxiety Disorders.","authors":"Sophie J Dickson, Ella L Oar, Maria Kangas, Carly J Johnco, Cassie H Lavell, Ashleigh H Seaton, Lauren F McLellan, Viviana M Wuthrich, Ronald M Rapee","doi":"10.1007/s10567-024-00484-5","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10567-024-00484-5","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Anxiety disorders are common, emerge during childhood, and pose a significant burden to society and individuals. Research evaluating the impact of anxiety on functional impairment and quality of life (QoL) is increasing; however, there is yet to be a systematic review and meta-analysis of these relationships in pediatric samples. This systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to determine the extent of impairments in functioning and QoL that young people with anxiety disorders experience relative to their healthy peers, as well as sociodemographic and clinical moderators of these relationships. Studies were included when they compared young people (mean age range within studies 7-17 years) with a primary clinical anxiety disorder to a healthy comparison group and measured impairment and/or QoL via a validated instrument. A total of 12 studies met criteria for this review (N = 3,129 participants). A majority of studies (K = 9) assessed impairment as an outcome measure, and three assessed QoL outcomes. Meta-analysis of nine studies (N = 1,457 children) showed large relationships between clinical anxiety and life impairment (g = 3.23) with the strongest effects seen for clinician report (g = 5.00), followed by caregiver (g = 2.15) and child (g = 1.58) report. The small number of studies and diversity in methodology prevented quantitative investigation of moderating factors. In the systematic review of QoL outcomes, all three studies reported significantly poorer QoL for youth with anxiety disorders relative to unaffected peers. Findings support the importance of measuring functioning and QoL as outcomes in clinical research and practice among anxious young people.This study is registered with PROSPERO under the identification number CRD42023439040.</p>","PeriodicalId":51399,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review","volume":" ","pages":"342-356"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11222200/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141088546","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
What is Parental Monitoring? 什么是家长监控?
IF 5.5 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-13 DOI: 10.1007/s10567-024-00490-7
William E Pelham, Sarah J Racz, Isabella S Davis, Isabel R Aks, Herry Patel, Robert J McMahon, Makayla A Thornburg, Yun-Ting Wendy Huang, Emily M Schulze, Oscar Gonzalez, Susan F Tapert, Sandra A Brown

Parental monitoring is a construct of longstanding interest in multiple fields-but what is it? This paper makes two contributions to the ongoing debate. First, we review how the published literature has defined and operationalized parental monitoring. We show that the monitoring construct has often been defined in an indirect and nonspecific fashion and measured using instruments that vary widely in conceptual content. The result has been a disjointed empirical literature that cannot accurately be described as the unified study of a single construct nor is achieving a cumulative scientific character. Second, we offer a new formulation of the monitoring construct intended to remedy this situation. We define parental monitoring as the set of all behaviors performed by caregivers with the goal of acquiring information about the youth's activities and life. We introduce a taxonomy identifying 5 distinct types of monitoring behaviors (Types 1-5), with each behavior varying along five dimensions (performer, target, frequency, context, style). We distinguish parental monitoring from 16 other parenting constructs it is often conflated with and position monitoring as one element within the broader parent-youth monitoring process: the continuous, dyadic interplay between caregivers and youth as they navigate caregivers attempts' to monitor youth. By offering an explicit and detailed conceptualization of monitoring, we aim to foster more rigorous and impactful research in this area.

家长监督是多个领域长期关注的一个概念,但什么是家长监督?本文将对这一争论做出两方面的贡献。首先,我们回顾了已发表的文献是如何定义和操作父母监督的。我们发现,对 "监督 "这一概念的定义往往是间接的、非特定的,而测量的工具在概念内容上也大相径庭。其结果是,实证文献相互脱节,既不能准确地描述为对单一建构的统一研究,也无法实现科学性的累积。其次,我们提出了一种新的监控概念,旨在纠正这种情况。我们将父母的监控定义为:照料者以获取青少年的活动和生活信息为目的而实施的所有行为的集合。我们引入了一种分类法,确定了 5 种不同类型的监控行为(类型 1-5),每种行为在 5 个维度(实施者、目标、频率、背景、风格)上各不相同。我们将父母的监督行为与其他 16 种经常被混为一谈的养育行为区分开来,并将监督行为定位为更广泛的父母-青少年监督过程中的一个要素:当照顾者试图监督青少年时,照顾者与青少年之间持续的、双向的相互作用。通过对 "监控 "进行明确而详细的概念化,我们旨在促进该领域更严谨、更有影响力的研究。
{"title":"What is Parental Monitoring?","authors":"William E Pelham, Sarah J Racz, Isabella S Davis, Isabel R Aks, Herry Patel, Robert J McMahon, Makayla A Thornburg, Yun-Ting Wendy Huang, Emily M Schulze, Oscar Gonzalez, Susan F Tapert, Sandra A Brown","doi":"10.1007/s10567-024-00490-7","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10567-024-00490-7","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Parental monitoring is a construct of longstanding interest in multiple fields-but what is it? This paper makes two contributions to the ongoing debate. First, we review how the published literature has defined and operationalized parental monitoring. We show that the monitoring construct has often been defined in an indirect and nonspecific fashion and measured using instruments that vary widely in conceptual content. The result has been a disjointed empirical literature that cannot accurately be described as the unified study of a single construct nor is achieving a cumulative scientific character. Second, we offer a new formulation of the monitoring construct intended to remedy this situation. We define parental monitoring as the set of all behaviors performed by caregivers with the goal of acquiring information about the youth's activities and life. We introduce a taxonomy identifying 5 distinct types of monitoring behaviors (Types 1-5), with each behavior varying along five dimensions (performer, target, frequency, context, style). We distinguish parental monitoring from 16 other parenting constructs it is often conflated with and position monitoring as one element within the broader parent-youth monitoring process: the continuous, dyadic interplay between caregivers and youth as they navigate caregivers attempts' to monitor youth. By offering an explicit and detailed conceptualization of monitoring, we aim to foster more rigorous and impactful research in this area.</p>","PeriodicalId":51399,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review","volume":" ","pages":"576-601"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11801412/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141312311","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
An Equity-Focused Assessment of Evidence-Based Parenting Intervention Research. 对以证据为基础的育儿干预研究进行以公平为重点的评估。
IF 5.5 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-16 DOI: 10.1007/s10567-024-00479-2
Suzanne E U Kerns, Samuel J Maddox, Ruth E Berhanu, Heather Allan, Rachel A Wilson, Antonia Chiesa, Rebecca Orsi-Hunt, Lauren Pryce McCarthy, Lesly J Henry, Chaundrissa Oyeshiku Smith

Evidence-based parenting interventions (EBPI) support children and families to promote resilience, address emotional and behavioral concerns, and prevent or address issues related to child maltreatment. Critiques of EBPIs include concerns about their relevance and effectiveness for diverse populations when they are implemented at population scale. Research methods that center racial equity and include community-based participatory approaches have the potential to address some of these concerns. The purpose of the present review was to document the extent to which methods associated with promoting racial equity in research have been used in studies that contribute to the evidence base for programs that meet evidentiary standards for a clearinghouse that was developed to support the Family First Prevention Services Act in the United States. We developed a coding system largely based on the Culturally Responsive Evaluation model. A sample of 47 papers that are part of the evidence base for ten in-home parent skill-based programs were reviewed and coded. Only three of 28 possible codes were observed to occur in over half of the studies (including race/ethnicity demographic characteristics, conducting measure reliability for the study sample, and including information on socioeconomic status). Although the overall presence of equity-informed methods was low, a positive trend was observed over time. This review highlights ways in which rigorous research can incorporate racial equity into the planning, design, execution, and interpretation and dissemination of programs of study. We posit that doing so improves the external validity of studies while maintaining high-quality research that can contribute to an evidence base.

循证养育干预(EBPI)可帮助儿童和家庭提高适应能力,解决情绪和行为问题,预防或解决与虐待儿童相关的问题。对 EBPI 的批评包括,当 EBPI 在人群范围内实施时,其对不同人群的相关性和有效性令人担忧。以种族公平为中心并包含社区参与式方法的研究方法有可能解决其中的一些问题。本综述的目的是记录与促进研究中的种族公平相关的方法在多大程度上被用于研究中,这些研究为符合美国《家庭第一预防服务法案》(Family First Prevention Services Act)证据标准的项目提供了证据基础。我们开发的编码系统主要基于文化响应评估模型。我们对作为十项以家庭父母技能为基础的计划证据库一部分的 47 篇论文进行了抽样审查和编码。在 28 个可能的编码中,只有 3 个编码在超过一半的研究中出现(包括种族/民族人口特征、对研究样本进行测量的可靠性,以及包括社会经济状况的信息)。尽管采用公平方法的总体比例较低,但随着时间的推移,观察到了积极的趋势。本综述强调了严谨研究将种族公平纳入研究计划的规划、设计、执行、解释和传播的方法。我们认为,这样做既能提高研究的外部有效性,又能保持高质量的研究,为证据库做出贡献。
{"title":"An Equity-Focused Assessment of Evidence-Based Parenting Intervention Research.","authors":"Suzanne E U Kerns, Samuel J Maddox, Ruth E Berhanu, Heather Allan, Rachel A Wilson, Antonia Chiesa, Rebecca Orsi-Hunt, Lauren Pryce McCarthy, Lesly J Henry, Chaundrissa Oyeshiku Smith","doi":"10.1007/s10567-024-00479-2","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10567-024-00479-2","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Evidence-based parenting interventions (EBPI) support children and families to promote resilience, address emotional and behavioral concerns, and prevent or address issues related to child maltreatment. Critiques of EBPIs include concerns about their relevance and effectiveness for diverse populations when they are implemented at population scale. Research methods that center racial equity and include community-based participatory approaches have the potential to address some of these concerns. The purpose of the present review was to document the extent to which methods associated with promoting racial equity in research have been used in studies that contribute to the evidence base for programs that meet evidentiary standards for a clearinghouse that was developed to support the Family First Prevention Services Act in the United States. We developed a coding system largely based on the Culturally Responsive Evaluation model. A sample of 47 papers that are part of the evidence base for ten in-home parent skill-based programs were reviewed and coded. Only three of 28 possible codes were observed to occur in over half of the studies (including race/ethnicity demographic characteristics, conducting measure reliability for the study sample, and including information on socioeconomic status). Although the overall presence of equity-informed methods was low, a positive trend was observed over time. This review highlights ways in which rigorous research can incorporate racial equity into the planning, design, execution, and interpretation and dissemination of programs of study. We posit that doing so improves the external validity of studies while maintaining high-quality research that can contribute to an evidence base.</p>","PeriodicalId":51399,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review","volume":" ","pages":"279-299"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11222220/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140946156","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Mandated Parent Education: Applications, Impacts, and Future Directions. 强制性家长教育:应用、影响和未来方向。
IF 5.5 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-18 DOI: 10.1007/s10567-024-00488-1
Cheri J Shapiro, Crystal Hill-Chapman, Stephanie Williams

Mandated participation in parent education programs is a common practice across the United States for families who are undergoing divorce or who are involved in the child welfare or juvenile justice systems. Mandates to participate in parenting programs create substantial challenges for families, service providers, and service systems. Furthermore, the type and quality of the parenting services accessed vary widely, and their impacts need to be better understood. To address this need, an overview of the current state of the empirical literature on the impacts and outcomes of mandated parenting interventions for divorce and in child welfare and juvenile justice settings is provided, and suggestions to the field are offered to refine research related to mandated parenting programs. Given the challenges that mandated parenting programs pose, an alternative approach that views parenting through a public health lens is highlighted to build on the growing body of research on the impacts of population-wide applications of parenting support programs, and as a possible way to decrease the number of parents who are required to attend parenting programs. Opportunities to advance universal parenting support within a range of community settings, including primary care, early childhood education, and community mental health systems are offered. Gaps in knowledge regarding mechanisms of action of universal supports and impacts on the number of parents mandated to treatment are highlighted, and future directions for research in this area are suggested.

强制参加家长教育计划是美国各地正在经历离婚或涉及儿童福利或青少年司法系统的家庭的普遍做法。强制参加亲职教育项目给家庭、服务提供者和服务系统带来了巨大的挑战。此外,亲职教育服务的类型和质量也千差万别,需要更好地了解其影响。为了满足这一需求,本文概述了有关离婚、儿童福利和青少年司法环境中强制养育干预措施的影响和结果的实证文献现状,并向该领域提出了完善强制养育计划相关研究的建议。考虑到强制亲职教育项目所带来的挑战,本文强调了一种从公共健康角度看待亲职教育的替代方法,以不断增加的有关在全民范围内应用亲职支持项目的影响的研究为基础,并将其作为减少被要求参加亲职教育项目的父母人数的一种可能方法。我们还提供了在各种社区环境(包括初级保健、幼儿教育和社区心理健康系统)中推进全民育儿支持的机会。强调了在普遍支持的作用机制和对强制接受治疗的父母人数的影响方面存在的知识差距,并提出了该领域未来的研究方向。
{"title":"Mandated Parent Education: Applications, Impacts, and Future Directions.","authors":"Cheri J Shapiro, Crystal Hill-Chapman, Stephanie Williams","doi":"10.1007/s10567-024-00488-1","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10567-024-00488-1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Mandated participation in parent education programs is a common practice across the United States for families who are undergoing divorce or who are involved in the child welfare or juvenile justice systems. Mandates to participate in parenting programs create substantial challenges for families, service providers, and service systems. Furthermore, the type and quality of the parenting services accessed vary widely, and their impacts need to be better understood. To address this need, an overview of the current state of the empirical literature on the impacts and outcomes of mandated parenting interventions for divorce and in child welfare and juvenile justice settings is provided, and suggestions to the field are offered to refine research related to mandated parenting programs. Given the challenges that mandated parenting programs pose, an alternative approach that views parenting through a public health lens is highlighted to build on the growing body of research on the impacts of population-wide applications of parenting support programs, and as a possible way to decrease the number of parents who are required to attend parenting programs. Opportunities to advance universal parenting support within a range of community settings, including primary care, early childhood education, and community mental health systems are offered. Gaps in knowledge regarding mechanisms of action of universal supports and impacts on the number of parents mandated to treatment are highlighted, and future directions for research in this area are suggested.</p>","PeriodicalId":51399,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review","volume":" ","pages":"300-316"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11222221/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140960673","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Outcomes of Best-Practice Guided Digital Mental Health Interventions for Youth and Young Adults with Emerging Symptoms: Part I. A Systematic Review of Socioemotional Outcomes and Recommendations. 针对有新症状的青少年的最佳实践指导数字心理健康干预成果:第一部分:社会情感成果的系统回顾与建议。
IF 5.5 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-15 DOI: 10.1007/s10567-024-00469-4
Jessica E Opie, An Vuong, Ellen T Welsh, Richard Gray, Natalie Pearce, Sonia Marchionda, Rachel Mutch, Hanan Khalil

Youth-specific digital mental health interventions (DMHI) represent an emerging field of study, and aim to increase access, improve socioemotional outcomes, and, where required, support triage to targeted interventions. However, prior reviews have reported inconsistent findings on the clinical effectiveness of such interventions in young adults (12-25 years). Further, shortfalls remain for the impact of guided interventions based on the mode of delivery and the type of human support personnel (e.g., professional or peer) guiding the intervention. In response, this systematic review, co-designed with Australia's leading mental health organization, aims to assess the effectiveness of guided digital programs in improving youth socioemotional outcomes. Included studies involve young people experiencing mental ill-health, receiving brief (i.e., 1-12 sessions), digitally delivered (at least partially) psychological interventions that were guided or partially guided, tested in a type of experimental study, with a socioemotional outcome. Specific socioemotional outcomes examined were depression, anxiety, stress, wellbeing, mindfulness, and quality of life. A systematic search of the contemporary published and grey literature identified 22,482 records with 32 relevant records published between 2018 and 2023. A narrative synthesis guided integration of findings. Results demonstrated strong evidence for the effectiveness of guided interventions on socioemotional outcomes (i.e., depression, anxiety, stress) yet these effects were short-lived. When factoring in the use of different control groups (i.e., active vs. inactive), inconsistent effects were observed for the socioemotional outcomes of depression, anxiety, and stress. The mode of delivery (i.e., asynchronous, synchronous, combined) and the type of human support personnel did not appear to impact socioemotional outcomes. Results indicate efficacious brief digital interventions for depression and anxiety include refresher/follow-up content, goal setting content, and relapse prevention content. In contrast, poor efficacy is associated with interventions that include homework tasks, self-monitoring, and log-keeping content.PROSPERO, ID CRD42023405812.

针对青少年的数字心理健康干预(DMHI)是一个新兴的研究领域,其目的是增加获取途径、改善社会情感结果,并在必要时支持对目标干预进行分流。然而,之前的综述报告对此类干预措施在青壮年(12-25 岁)中的临床效果得出的结论并不一致。此外,根据提供干预的方式和人类支持人员(如专业人员或同伴)的类型,指导性干预的影响仍然存在不足。为此,本系统性综述与澳大利亚领先的心理健康组织共同设计,旨在评估引导式数字项目在改善青少年社会情感成果方面的有效性。所纳入的研究涉及心理不健康的青少年,他们接受了简短(即 1-12 次)、数字交付(至少部分)的心理干预,这些干预是在指导下或部分在指导下进行的,在一种实验研究类型中进行了测试,并得出了社会情感结果。研究的具体社会情感结果包括抑郁、焦虑、压力、幸福感、正念和生活质量。通过对当代出版文献和灰色文献进行系统检索,共发现22482条记录,其中32条相关记录发表于2018年至2023年之间。叙事综合法指导了研究结果的整合。结果表明,引导式干预对社会情感结果(即抑郁、焦虑、压力)的有效性证据确凿,但这些效果是短暂的。如果考虑到使用不同的对照组(即积极与消极对照组),抑郁、焦虑和压力等社会情感结果的效果并不一致。提供方式(即异步、同步、组合)和人力支持人员的类型似乎对社会情感结果没有影响。结果表明,对抑郁和焦虑有效的简短数字干预包括复习/后续内容、目标设定内容和预防复发内容。相比之下,包括家庭作业任务、自我监控和日志记录内容的干预效果较差。
{"title":"Outcomes of Best-Practice Guided Digital Mental Health Interventions for Youth and Young Adults with Emerging Symptoms: Part I. A Systematic Review of Socioemotional Outcomes and Recommendations.","authors":"Jessica E Opie, An Vuong, Ellen T Welsh, Richard Gray, Natalie Pearce, Sonia Marchionda, Rachel Mutch, Hanan Khalil","doi":"10.1007/s10567-024-00469-4","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10567-024-00469-4","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Youth-specific digital mental health interventions (DMHI) represent an emerging field of study, and aim to increase access, improve socioemotional outcomes, and, where required, support triage to targeted interventions. However, prior reviews have reported inconsistent findings on the clinical effectiveness of such interventions in young adults (12-25 years). Further, shortfalls remain for the impact of guided interventions based on the mode of delivery and the type of human support personnel (e.g., professional or peer) guiding the intervention. In response, this systematic review, co-designed with Australia's leading mental health organization, aims to assess the effectiveness of guided digital programs in improving youth socioemotional outcomes. Included studies involve young people experiencing mental ill-health, receiving brief (i.e., 1-12 sessions), digitally delivered (at least partially) psychological interventions that were guided or partially guided, tested in a type of experimental study, with a socioemotional outcome. Specific socioemotional outcomes examined were depression, anxiety, stress, wellbeing, mindfulness, and quality of life. A systematic search of the contemporary published and grey literature identified 22,482 records with 32 relevant records published between 2018 and 2023. A narrative synthesis guided integration of findings. Results demonstrated strong evidence for the effectiveness of guided interventions on socioemotional outcomes (i.e., depression, anxiety, stress) yet these effects were short-lived. When factoring in the use of different control groups (i.e., active vs. inactive), inconsistent effects were observed for the socioemotional outcomes of depression, anxiety, and stress. The mode of delivery (i.e., asynchronous, synchronous, combined) and the type of human support personnel did not appear to impact socioemotional outcomes. Results indicate efficacious brief digital interventions for depression and anxiety include refresher/follow-up content, goal setting content, and relapse prevention content. In contrast, poor efficacy is associated with interventions that include homework tasks, self-monitoring, and log-keeping content.PROSPERO, ID CRD42023405812.</p>","PeriodicalId":51399,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review","volume":" ","pages":"424-475"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11222273/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140137522","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
An Expanded Conceptual Framework for Understanding Irritability in Childhood: The Role of Cognitive Control Processes. 理解儿童易激惹性的扩展概念框架:认知控制过程的作用》。
IF 5.5 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-10 DOI: 10.1007/s10567-024-00489-0
Olivia M Elvin, Kathryn L Modecki, Allison M Waters

Children prone to irritability experience significant functional impairments and internalising and externalising problems. Contemporary models have sought to elucidate the underlying mechanisms in irritability, such as aberrant threat and reward biases to improve interventions. However, the cognitive control processes that underlie threat (e.g., attention towards threats) and reward (e.g., attention towards reward-related cues) biases and the factors which influence the differential activation of positive and negative valence systems and thus leading to maladaptive activation of cognitive control processes (i.e., proactive and reactive control) are unclear. Thus, we aim to integrate extant theoretical and empirical research to elucidate the cognitive control processes underlying threat and reward processing that contribute to irritability in middle childhood and provide a guiding framework for future research and treatment. We propose an expanded conceptual framework of irritability that includes broad intraindividual and environmental vulnerability factors and propose proximal 'setting' factors that activate the negative valence and positive valence systems and proactive and reactive cognitive control processes which underpin the expression and progression of irritability. We consider the implications of this expanded conceptualisation of irritability and provide suggestions for future research.

易激怒的儿童会出现严重的功能障碍以及内化和外化问题。现代模型试图阐明易怒的内在机制,如异常的威胁和奖励偏差,以改进干预措施。然而,导致威胁(如对威胁的注意)和奖赏(如对奖赏相关线索的注意)偏差的认知控制过程,以及影响积极和消极情绪系统的不同激活从而导致认知控制过程(即主动和被动控制)不适应性激活的因素尚不清楚。因此,我们旨在整合现有的理论和实证研究,以阐明导致中童年期易怒的威胁和奖赏处理的认知控制过程,并为未来的研究和治疗提供指导框架。我们提出了一个扩展的易激惹概念框架,其中包括广泛的个体内部因素和环境易激惹因素,并提出了近似的 "环境 "因素,这些因素激活了消极情绪和积极情绪系统以及主动和被动的认知控制过程,而这些过程是易激惹的表现和发展的基础。我们考虑了这一扩展的易激惹概念的含义,并为未来的研究提供了建议。
{"title":"An Expanded Conceptual Framework for Understanding Irritability in Childhood: The Role of Cognitive Control Processes.","authors":"Olivia M Elvin, Kathryn L Modecki, Allison M Waters","doi":"10.1007/s10567-024-00489-0","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10567-024-00489-0","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Children prone to irritability experience significant functional impairments and internalising and externalising problems. Contemporary models have sought to elucidate the underlying mechanisms in irritability, such as aberrant threat and reward biases to improve interventions. However, the cognitive control processes that underlie threat (e.g., attention towards threats) and reward (e.g., attention towards reward-related cues) biases and the factors which influence the differential activation of positive and negative valence systems and thus leading to maladaptive activation of cognitive control processes (i.e., proactive and reactive control) are unclear. Thus, we aim to integrate extant theoretical and empirical research to elucidate the cognitive control processes underlying threat and reward processing that contribute to irritability in middle childhood and provide a guiding framework for future research and treatment. We propose an expanded conceptual framework of irritability that includes broad intraindividual and environmental vulnerability factors and propose proximal 'setting' factors that activate the negative valence and positive valence systems and proactive and reactive cognitive control processes which underpin the expression and progression of irritability. We consider the implications of this expanded conceptualisation of irritability and provide suggestions for future research.</p>","PeriodicalId":51399,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review","volume":" ","pages":"381-406"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11222227/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141297274","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1