首页 > 最新文献

Assessment in Education-Principles Policy & Practice最新文献

英文 中文
Student views on the assessment medium for General Certificates of Secondary Education in England: insights from the 2020 examination cancellations 学生对英格兰普通中等教育证书评估媒介的看法:从 2020 年取消考试中得到的启示
IF 3.2 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2024-03-28 DOI: 10.1080/0969594x.2024.2334298
Kevin Woods, Tee McCaldin, Kerry Brown, Rob Buck, Nicola Fairhall, Emma Forshaw, David Soares
In England, Wales and Northern Ireland, the General Certificate of Secondary Education (GCSE) has been for the last 35 years the most common qualification by which students’ attainment at age 16 ha...
在英格兰、威尔士和北爱尔兰,普通中等教育证书(GCSE)在过去的 35 年里一直是学生在 16 岁时获得的最常见的资格证书。
{"title":"Student views on the assessment medium for General Certificates of Secondary Education in England: insights from the 2020 examination cancellations","authors":"Kevin Woods, Tee McCaldin, Kerry Brown, Rob Buck, Nicola Fairhall, Emma Forshaw, David Soares","doi":"10.1080/0969594x.2024.2334298","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594x.2024.2334298","url":null,"abstract":"In England, Wales and Northern Ireland, the General Certificate of Secondary Education (GCSE) has been for the last 35 years the most common qualification by which students’ attainment at age 16 ha...","PeriodicalId":51515,"journal":{"name":"Assessment in Education-Principles Policy & Practice","volume":"59 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2024-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140587977","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Searching students’ reflective writing for linguistic correlates of their tendency to ignore instructors’ feedback 从学生的反思性写作中寻找他们忽视教师反馈意见的语言相关性
IF 3.2 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2024-03-20 DOI: 10.1080/0969594x.2024.2332267
Robert A. Nash, Jason M. Thomas
Students who ignore feedback are poorly positioned to reap its intended benefits. In this study we examined three reflective assignments written by undergraduate Psychology students about their exp...
忽视反馈的学生很难从反馈中获益。在这项研究中,我们考察了心理学本科生撰写的三份反思性作业,这些作业讲述了他们在学习过程中的经历和体验。
{"title":"Searching students’ reflective writing for linguistic correlates of their tendency to ignore instructors’ feedback","authors":"Robert A. Nash, Jason M. Thomas","doi":"10.1080/0969594x.2024.2332267","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594x.2024.2332267","url":null,"abstract":"Students who ignore feedback are poorly positioned to reap its intended benefits. In this study we examined three reflective assignments written by undergraduate Psychology students about their exp...","PeriodicalId":51515,"journal":{"name":"Assessment in Education-Principles Policy & Practice","volume":"122 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2024-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140171760","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Lower secondary school teachers’ arguments on the use of a 26-point grading scale and gender differences in use and perceptions 初中教师对使用 26 分制评分表的看法以及在使用和看法上的性别差异
IF 3.2 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2024-03-10 DOI: 10.1080/0969594x.2024.2325365
Siv M. Gamlem, Meerita Segaran, Synnøve Moltudal
This study explores lower secondary school teachers’ arguments and perceptions for using a 26-point grading scale (26-PGS), and gender differences in assessment practice. An explanatory sequential ...
本研究探讨了初中教师使用 26 分制评分表(26-PGS)的理由和看法,以及评估实践中的性别差异。研究采用了解释性顺序分析法。
{"title":"Lower secondary school teachers’ arguments on the use of a 26-point grading scale and gender differences in use and perceptions","authors":"Siv M. Gamlem, Meerita Segaran, Synnøve Moltudal","doi":"10.1080/0969594x.2024.2325365","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594x.2024.2325365","url":null,"abstract":"This study explores lower secondary school teachers’ arguments and perceptions for using a 26-point grading scale (26-PGS), and gender differences in assessment practice. An explanatory sequential ...","PeriodicalId":51515,"journal":{"name":"Assessment in Education-Principles Policy & Practice","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2024-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140151561","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Who responds inconsistently to mixed-worded scales? Differences by achievement, age group, and gender 谁对混合词量表的反应不一致?成绩、年龄组和性别的差异
IF 3.2 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2024-02-15 DOI: 10.1080/0969594x.2024.2318554
Isa Steinmann, Jianan Chen, Johan Braeken
We investigated two research questions: which students are more likely to respond inconsistently to mixed-worded questionnaire scales, and which country samples have larger shares of inconsistent r...
我们调查了两个研究问题:哪些学生更有可能对混合用词的问卷量表做出不一致的回答;哪些国家的样本有更大比例的不一致回答。
{"title":"Who responds inconsistently to mixed-worded scales? Differences by achievement, age group, and gender","authors":"Isa Steinmann, Jianan Chen, Johan Braeken","doi":"10.1080/0969594x.2024.2318554","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594x.2024.2318554","url":null,"abstract":"We investigated two research questions: which students are more likely to respond inconsistently to mixed-worded questionnaire scales, and which country samples have larger shares of inconsistent r...","PeriodicalId":51515,"journal":{"name":"Assessment in Education-Principles Policy & Practice","volume":"93 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2024-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139767041","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Moderation of non-exam assessments: a novel approach using comparative judgement 非考试评估的调节:使用比较判断的新方法
IF 3.2 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2024-02-15 DOI: 10.1080/0969594x.2024.2313237
Lucy Chambers, Sylvia Vitello, Carmen Vidal Rodeiro
In England, some secondary-level qualifications comprise non-exam assessments which need to undergo moderation before grading. Currently, moderation is conducted at centre (school) level. This rais...
在英格兰,一些中学阶段的资格证书包含非考试评估,在评分前需要经过调控。目前,审核在中心(学校)一级进行。这引起了...
{"title":"Moderation of non-exam assessments: a novel approach using comparative judgement","authors":"Lucy Chambers, Sylvia Vitello, Carmen Vidal Rodeiro","doi":"10.1080/0969594x.2024.2313237","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594x.2024.2313237","url":null,"abstract":"In England, some secondary-level qualifications comprise non-exam assessments which need to undergo moderation before grading. Currently, moderation is conducted at centre (school) level. This rais...","PeriodicalId":51515,"journal":{"name":"Assessment in Education-Principles Policy & Practice","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2024-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139773638","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Cultivating realistic self-appraisal: examining student overclaiming and fair assessment through PISA and classroom data 培养实事求是的自我评价:通过国际学生评估项目(PISA)和课堂数据研究学生的过高要求和公平评价
IF 3.2 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2024-01-03 DOI: 10.1080/0969594x.2023.2294428
Therese Hopfenbeck
Published in Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice (Vol. 30, No. 5-6, 2023)
发表于《教育评估》:原则、政策与实践》(第 30 卷,第 5-6 期,2023 年)
{"title":"Cultivating realistic self-appraisal: examining student overclaiming and fair assessment through PISA and classroom data","authors":"Therese Hopfenbeck","doi":"10.1080/0969594x.2023.2294428","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594x.2023.2294428","url":null,"abstract":"Published in Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice (Vol. 30, No. 5-6, 2023)","PeriodicalId":51515,"journal":{"name":"Assessment in Education-Principles Policy & Practice","volume":"53 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2024-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139396724","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Students’ experiences in self-assessment: training, processes and feedback use in secondary and higher education 学生自我评估的经验:中等和高等教育中的培训、过程和反馈的使用
IF 3.2 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2023-12-26 DOI: 10.1080/0969594x.2023.2284630
Leire Pinedo, Ernesto Panadero, Javier Fernández-Ruiz, Carlos Rodríguez-Hernández
Self-assessment is a widely explored topic in educational research. However, more research is needed on some of the self-assessment practices and their relationship with academic performance. This ...
自我评估是教育研究中一个被广泛探讨的课题。然而,还需要对一些自我评估实践及其与学习成绩的关系进行更多的研究。本 ...
{"title":"Students’ experiences in self-assessment: training, processes and feedback use in secondary and higher education","authors":"Leire Pinedo, Ernesto Panadero, Javier Fernández-Ruiz, Carlos Rodríguez-Hernández","doi":"10.1080/0969594x.2023.2284630","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594x.2023.2284630","url":null,"abstract":"Self-assessment is a widely explored topic in educational research. However, more research is needed on some of the self-assessment practices and their relationship with academic performance. This ...","PeriodicalId":51515,"journal":{"name":"Assessment in Education-Principles Policy & Practice","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2023-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139065168","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Decomposing social-emotional skill rubrics: a methodological approach to examining acquiescence in rubrics’ ratings 分解社会情感技能标准:一种检验默认标准评级的方法论方法
IF 3.2 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2023-11-15 DOI: 10.1080/0969594x.2023.2271679
Gina Pancorbo, Ricardo Primi, Oliver P. John, Daniel Santos, Filip De Fruyt
Rubrics are popular tools to assess students’ social-emotional skills. However, little research has been devoted to investigating whether rubrics’ performance level descriptions validly represent t...
标准是评估学生社交情感技能的常用工具。然而,很少有研究致力于调查标题的性能水平描述是否有效地代表…
{"title":"Decomposing social-emotional skill rubrics: a methodological approach to examining acquiescence in rubrics’ ratings","authors":"Gina Pancorbo, Ricardo Primi, Oliver P. John, Daniel Santos, Filip De Fruyt","doi":"10.1080/0969594x.2023.2271679","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594x.2023.2271679","url":null,"abstract":"Rubrics are popular tools to assess students’ social-emotional skills. However, little research has been devoted to investigating whether rubrics’ performance level descriptions validly represent t...","PeriodicalId":51515,"journal":{"name":"Assessment in Education-Principles Policy & Practice","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2023-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138541280","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Use of technology-based assessments: a systematic review covering over 30 countries 使用基于技术的评估:覆盖30多个国家的系统审查
3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2023-11-05 DOI: 10.1080/0969594x.2023.2270181
Dandan Chen, Amos Jeng, Shiyu Sun, Bradley Kaptur
ABSTRACTThe widespread adoption of technology-based assessments during the COVID-19 pandemic has exacerbated concerns about the digital divide, given global disparities in digital access, connectivity, and coping strategies. This systematic review was intended to assess how the use of technology-based assessments has affected the education system’s functioning in pre-college education, compared to traditional assessments. It covered 34 countries from 34 full-text English sources in 2018–2022. A total of 12 assumptions were tested, corresponding to six hypotheses about the learning, educating, and management facets associated with the use of technology-based assessments. Our findings revealed mixed evidence about technology-based assessments in reducing cheating, enhancing learning, supporting monitoring, improving instruction, and reducing non-teaching workload. However, strong evidence supported the assumptions that technology-based assessments improve measurement precision, interpretability, engagement, interaction, and teacher-parent communication. Limited but positive evidence supported the assumptions that technology-based assessments may reduce the cost and time of test administration.KEYWORDS: Educational technologysystematic reviewtechnology-based assessmentinternational context AcknowledgmentsThe authors express sincere appreciation and gratitude to Dr. Priyadarshani Joshi (Senior Research Analyst, GEM Report, UNESCO) and Dr. Patrick Montjouridès (Senior Program Specialist, UNESCO), who offered considerable feedback on the first draft of this paper. Also, the authors thank Dr. Jinming Zhang (Professor), Ms. Jing Zhang, and Mr. Yingbin Zhang (doctoral students) at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign for their support, and the journal editor and anonymous reviewers whose comments led to a significant improvement of this article. Any remaining errors or omissions are the authors’ own.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.GeolocationArgentina, Australia, Canada, Chile, China, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, France, Germany, India, Indonesia, Italy, Kazakhstan, Lithuania, Malaysia, Netherlands, Norway, Pakistan, Philippines, Poland, Russia, Saudi Arabia, Singapore, Slovakia, Slovenia, South Korea, Spain, Switzerland, Thailand, Turkey, United Kingdom, Vietnam.Data availability statementThe data that support the findings of this study are available, but restrictions apply to the availability of these data, which were used under licence for the current study, and so are not publicly available. Data are however available from the authors upon reasonable request.Supplementary materialSupplemental data for this article can be accessed online at https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2023.2270181.Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by the Global Education Monitoring (GEM) Report, UNESCO in Paris, France (Contract No. 4500461800). A previous version of this paper was prepared as
摘要2019冠状病毒病大流行期间广泛采用基于技术的评估,加剧了人们对数字鸿沟的担忧,因为全球在数字访问、连通性和应对策略方面存在差异。这项系统审查旨在评估与传统评估相比,使用基于技术的评估如何影响教育系统在大学前教育中的运作。在2018-2022年期间,它涵盖了34个国家的34个全文英文来源。总共测试了12个假设,对应于与使用基于技术的评估相关的学习、教育和管理方面的6个假设。我们的研究结果揭示了基于技术的评估在减少作弊、加强学习、支持监控、改善教学和减少非教学工作量方面的混合证据。然而,强有力的证据支持基于技术的评估提高测量精度、可解释性、参与、互动和教师与家长沟通的假设。有限但积极的证据支持基于技术的评估可能减少考试管理的成本和时间的假设。作者对Priyadarshani Joshi博士(联合国教科文组织GEM报告高级研究分析师)和Patrick montjourid<e:1>博士(联合国教科文组织高级项目专家)在本文初稿中提供的大量反馈意见表示诚挚的感谢。同时,作者感谢伊利诺伊大学香槟分校张金明博士(教授)、张静女士和张颖斌先生(博士生)的支持,以及期刊编辑和匿名审稿人的意见,他们的意见使本文得到了重大改进。任何剩余的错误或遗漏都是作者自己的。披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。地理位置阿根廷、澳大利亚、加拿大、智利、中国、克罗地亚、塞浦路斯、捷克共和国、丹麦、法国、德国、印度、印度尼西亚、意大利、哈萨克斯坦、立陶宛、马来西亚、荷兰、挪威、巴基斯坦、菲律宾、波兰、俄罗斯、沙特阿拉伯、新加坡、斯洛伐克、斯洛文尼亚、韩国、西班牙、瑞士、泰国、土耳其、英国、越南。数据可用性声明支持本研究结果的数据是可用的,但这些数据的可用性受到限制,这些数据是在当前研究的许可下使用的,因此不能公开获取。但如有合理要求,可向作者索取资料。本文的补充资料可从以下网址获取:https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2023.2270181.Additional information资助本工作得到法国巴黎联合国教科文组织《全球教育监测报告》(合同编号:4500461800)的支持。本文的前一个版本是作为《2023年全球教育监测报告:教育技术:一个工具》的背景研究而编写的。这里的评论和概念代表了作者的观点,不应归因于任何个人或组织。陈丹丹,美国皮尔逊大学副研究员。她拥有伊利诺伊大学厄巴纳-香槟分校教育心理学博士学位,专攻心理测量学。她获得了联合国教科文组织(2022年,2017年)、美国国家科学基金会(2018-2020年)和洛克菲勒慈善顾问(2016年)的资助,并为世界银行、教育委员会、联合国教科文组织和联合国人口基金撰写了系统评论并参与了报告。Amos Jeng是伊利诺伊大学厄巴纳-香槟分校教育心理学系的博士生。他的工作主要集中在教育环境中以学习为导向的互动。他特别感兴趣的是理解和改善大学生在STEM入门课程设置中寻求帮助和给予帮助的体验,以及将这些互动行为置于文化背景中。孙世宇,伊利诺伊大学香槟分校教育心理学系博士生。她的工作是调查大学生在不同情境下的归属感。更具体地说,她对探索国际学生在大学环境中的归属感感兴趣,并了解不同的文化和社会因素如何影响学生的归属感体验。Bradley KapturBradley kapturr是HSHS圣约翰医院放射学的住院医师,曾是伊利诺伊大学厄巴纳-香槟分校卡尔伊利诺伊医学院的医学生。他曾发表过关于医疗保健利用模式和医疗保健获取中的地理空间差异的文章。
{"title":"Use of technology-based assessments: a systematic review covering over 30 countries","authors":"Dandan Chen, Amos Jeng, Shiyu Sun, Bradley Kaptur","doi":"10.1080/0969594x.2023.2270181","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594x.2023.2270181","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTThe widespread adoption of technology-based assessments during the COVID-19 pandemic has exacerbated concerns about the digital divide, given global disparities in digital access, connectivity, and coping strategies. This systematic review was intended to assess how the use of technology-based assessments has affected the education system’s functioning in pre-college education, compared to traditional assessments. It covered 34 countries from 34 full-text English sources in 2018–2022. A total of 12 assumptions were tested, corresponding to six hypotheses about the learning, educating, and management facets associated with the use of technology-based assessments. Our findings revealed mixed evidence about technology-based assessments in reducing cheating, enhancing learning, supporting monitoring, improving instruction, and reducing non-teaching workload. However, strong evidence supported the assumptions that technology-based assessments improve measurement precision, interpretability, engagement, interaction, and teacher-parent communication. Limited but positive evidence supported the assumptions that technology-based assessments may reduce the cost and time of test administration.KEYWORDS: Educational technologysystematic reviewtechnology-based assessmentinternational context AcknowledgmentsThe authors express sincere appreciation and gratitude to Dr. Priyadarshani Joshi (Senior Research Analyst, GEM Report, UNESCO) and Dr. Patrick Montjouridès (Senior Program Specialist, UNESCO), who offered considerable feedback on the first draft of this paper. Also, the authors thank Dr. Jinming Zhang (Professor), Ms. Jing Zhang, and Mr. Yingbin Zhang (doctoral students) at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign for their support, and the journal editor and anonymous reviewers whose comments led to a significant improvement of this article. Any remaining errors or omissions are the authors’ own.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.GeolocationArgentina, Australia, Canada, Chile, China, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, France, Germany, India, Indonesia, Italy, Kazakhstan, Lithuania, Malaysia, Netherlands, Norway, Pakistan, Philippines, Poland, Russia, Saudi Arabia, Singapore, Slovakia, Slovenia, South Korea, Spain, Switzerland, Thailand, Turkey, United Kingdom, Vietnam.Data availability statementThe data that support the findings of this study are available, but restrictions apply to the availability of these data, which were used under licence for the current study, and so are not publicly available. Data are however available from the authors upon reasonable request.Supplementary materialSupplemental data for this article can be accessed online at https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2023.2270181.Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by the Global Education Monitoring (GEM) Report, UNESCO in Paris, France (Contract No. 4500461800). A previous version of this paper was prepared as","PeriodicalId":51515,"journal":{"name":"Assessment in Education-Principles Policy & Practice","volume":"4 4","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135725330","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Overclaiming. An international investigation using PISA data 过分的要求。一项使用PISA数据的国际调查
3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2023-09-14 DOI: 10.1080/0969594x.2023.2238248
John Jerrim, Philip D. Parker, Nikki Shure
This paper investigates the phenomena of overclaiming – the propensity for individuals to claim more knowledge about an issue or topic than they really (or could possibly) do. Using Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) data from nine Anglophone countries and over 40,000 young people, we examine teenagers’ propensity to claim knowledge of three mathematics constructs that do not really exist. We find substantial differences in young people’s tendency to overclaim across countries, genders, and socio-economic groups. Those who are most likely to overclaim are also found to exhibit high levels of overconfidence and believe they work hard, persevere at tasks, and are popular amongst their peers. Together this provides important new insight into overclaiming, how this differs across groups, and how it relates to other psychological constructs.
这篇论文调查了“夸夸其谈”的现象——个人倾向于声称对一个问题或话题的了解比他们实际(或可能)做的要多。利用来自9个英语国家和4万多名年轻人的国际学生评估项目(PISA)数据,我们研究了青少年声称掌握三种并不存在的数学结构的倾向。我们发现,不同国家、性别和社会经济群体的年轻人在过度要求的倾向上存在巨大差异。研究发现,那些最有可能夸大其词的人也表现出高度的过度自信,他们认为自己工作努力,坚持不懈,在同龄人中很受欢迎。总之,这为过度要求提供了重要的新见解,不同群体之间的差异,以及它与其他心理结构的关系。
{"title":"Overclaiming. An international investigation using PISA data","authors":"John Jerrim, Philip D. Parker, Nikki Shure","doi":"10.1080/0969594x.2023.2238248","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594x.2023.2238248","url":null,"abstract":"This paper investigates the phenomena of overclaiming – the propensity for individuals to claim more knowledge about an issue or topic than they really (or could possibly) do. Using Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) data from nine Anglophone countries and over 40,000 young people, we examine teenagers’ propensity to claim knowledge of three mathematics constructs that do not really exist. We find substantial differences in young people’s tendency to overclaim across countries, genders, and socio-economic groups. Those who are most likely to overclaim are also found to exhibit high levels of overconfidence and believe they work hard, persevere at tasks, and are popular amongst their peers. Together this provides important new insight into overclaiming, how this differs across groups, and how it relates to other psychological constructs.","PeriodicalId":51515,"journal":{"name":"Assessment in Education-Principles Policy & Practice","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135551953","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
期刊
Assessment in Education-Principles Policy & Practice
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1